+ Lessons Learned – What Works and What doesn’t Work CIH in Hangzhou, China PI: LEE, Liming...

Post on 01-Apr-2015

215 views 1 download

transcript

+

Lessons Learned – What Works and What doesn’t WorkCIH in Hangzhou, China

PI: LEE, Liming Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics Peking University Health Science Center lmlee@pumc.edu.cn

CIH Study Coordinator: LV, Jun Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics Peking University Health Science Center lvjun@bjmu.edu.cn

+Hangzhou City

Hangzhou

Beijing

2

+Hangzhou site

Control Site

Intervention Site

Gongshu DistrictPopulation: ~162 thous

Xiacheng DistrictPopulation: ~258 thous

Xihu DistrictPopulation: ~271 thous

3

+What we learn from

Baseline survey results

4

+Categorical physical activity levels by sex and age group

18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64Men Women

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

HighModerate

5

%

+Times eating out in the previous week, median times (P25, P75) by sex and age group

18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-64Men Women

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

6

+ Although accompanying conditions were more prevalent among older people and self-evaluation of health worsened with advanced age, older people lived a healthier lifestyle than younger people in China.

7

+How we implement

Intervention activities

8

9

+The main successes

10

A supportive environment can promote people to make healthy choices.

Hangzhou’s campaign of building a healthy city provides a good opportunity for the project. It gives a lot of policy and environmental supports to the intervention activities. The constructions of related facilities in targeted districts provide a platform for the community intervention. Hangzhou Public Bicycle Service Footpath along the canal, fitness paths and fitness equipment in

communities, distance markers and health signs Hangzhou Smoke Control Ordinance on March 1st 2010

11

+Public health system with Chinese characteristics increasing access to different settings in the community

12

+Primary health care (PHC) system

A strong and cost-effective community-based PHC system is central to meet the enormous pressure from chronic conditions Improving access and reducing inequity Achieving better management of chronic conditions

(disease management) Increasing the focus on prevention (health

management)

13

+Intervention activities easily implemented inside the health system

Ideas of how to promote healthy lifestyle have been updated for our local teams.

The intervention activities are more easily understood and supported by the managers inside the health system (as workplace).

14

+Community coalition for health

Make the first step to contact other non-health sectors

15

+The main challenges

16

+Community coalition for health

It’s hard for health sector to organize and coordinate other non-health sectors.

It needs time to realize active involvement of non-health sectors in the NCDs prevention & control Understand the importance of NCDs prevention &

control Know what roles they should play in this process and

how to integrate these into their routine functions Action!

17

+Challenges in traditional settings for intervention

Relatively long histories of collaboration between health sector and community and between health sector and education sector make the intervention activities easy to implement in the communities and schools. Intervention activities like presenting posters on

health, distributing leaflets, organizing health lectures in the community mainly attract the elderly.

The academic achievement of children is still the primary consideration of parents, teachers, and school managers.

18

+Challenges in new settings for intervention

Workplaces (private enterprises and public institutions) and restaurants, usually ignored in traditional intervention programs, are new focuses in this project. Health issue becomes a growing concern but is still not

a top priority for the managers in the workplaces and restaurants.

Refuse to join in the project or not compliant with the suggested intervention activities.

19

+Guidance on specific knowledges and skills required

A relatively high percentage of the people lived in urban areas has general knowledge on health but lacks of specific knowledge and skills on physical activity and diet. There is a urgent need for qualified dietitians /

nutritionists and fitness instructors / trainers . It’s necessary to speaking with one voice and

evidence-based. Now the public is confused by different voices, then does nothing (e.g., walking and climbing stairs can harm knees).

20

+Lack of attraction of health goals and intervention activities

21

VS.

Be less: boring, preachy, unimaginative, and not easy to

follow when comparing to the opposite of healthy and commercial ads

Distant hope for better health Intervention activities

+Bigger supportive social context has not been established completely, which becomes an obstacle to the success of single project in a limited areas

Many efforts or changes need to be achieved or can only be implemented at city-level or even nation-level E.g., raising tax on tobacco (nation-level), regulation

on smoke control in public places (at least city-level) E.g., strengthening public transport system (city-level),

reconstruction of the city environments and roads (city-level or district level)

E.g., changing cultures of smoking, drinking, diet, physical activity (city-level)

22

+Conclusions

The keys to success Building healthy city is a valuable practice and

provides a good opportunity for NCDs prevention & control.

A collaboration mechanism for multi-sectors stakeholders led by government instead of health sector is necessary.

Within health system, strengthening PHC system is the key to address equity and cost-effectiveness for NCDs prevention & control.

23

+Thank you

24