03.03 growth in pr pr planning - oksana hoshva

Post on 02-Nov-2014

703 views 3 download

Tags:

description

 

transcript

Оксана  Гошва,  HOSHVA  PR  Growth  in  PR-­‐5  

03.03.12  

PR  Planning  

successful  public  relaKons  campaigns  do  not  just  happen  

• sound  research  • meKculous  planning  

• and  careful  implementaKon  

they  are  the  

result  of    

Anne Gregory, 2009

list  of  excuses  that  are  offered  for  not  planning  

• We  don’t  have  Kme  • Why  plan  when  things  are  changing  so  fast?  

• We  get  paid  for  results,  not  for  planning  

• We’re  doing  OK  without  a  plan  

list  of  excuses  that  are  offered  for  not  planning  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

як  можна  відповісти  на  ці  аргументи?  

We  don’t  have  Kme   ?  

We  don’t  have  Kme   Those  with  a  plan  

make  beher  use  of  their  Kme  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

Why  plan  when  things  are  

changing  so  fast?   ?  

Why  plan  when  things  are  changing  

so  fast?  Plans  are  flexible,  providing  a  starKng  point  from  which  changes  are  made  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

We  get  paid  for  results,  not  for  

planning   ?  

We  get  paid  for  results,  not  for  

planning   This  actually  leads  to  a  focus  on  acKviKes  rather  than  results  that  count  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

We’re  doing  OK  without  a  plan  

?  

We’re  doing  OK  without  a  plan   This  short-­‐term  perspecKve  

ignores  that  conKngency  planning  is  an  important  

aspect  of  planning  as  a  whole  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

 while  accepKng  that  preparing  a  

plan  is  no  guarantee  of  its  

success  

 planning  greatly  enhances  its  chances  

Scott Munson Cutlip, 2006

reasons  for  planning  PR  acKvity  

•  focuses  effort  •  improves  effecKveness  •  encourages  the  long-­‐term  view  •  assists  proacKvity  •  reconciles  conflict  • minimises  mishaps  •  demonstrates  value  for  money  

reasons  for  

planning  PR  

acKvity  

Anne Gregory, 2009

PR  planning  models  

Cutlip  

Gregory  Smith  

the  circular  nature  of  public  relaKons  

planning  four-­‐step  problem-­‐solving  process  

Cutlip  

Gregory  

• Step  1:  Analyzing  the  SituaKon  • Step2:  Analyzing  the  OrganizaKon  • Step3:  Analyzing  the  Publics  

Phase  One:  Forma2ve  Research  

• Step  4:  Establishing  Goals  and  ObjecKves  • Step  5:  FormulaKng  AcKon  and  Response  Strategies  • Step  6:  Using  EffecKve  CommunicaKon  

Phase  Two:  Strategy  

• Step  7:  Choosing  CommunicaKon  TacKcs  • Step8:  ImplemenKng  the  Strategic  Plan  Phase  Three:  Tac2cs  

• Step  9:EvaluaKng  the  Strategic  Plan  Phase  Four:  Evalua2ve  Research  

Smith  

яку  модель  для  планування  обрали  б  ви  

Gregory  

а  якщо  ще  простіше?  

всього  6  запитань  

How  is  success  to  be  judged?    

How  the  message  should  be  communicated?  

What  should  be  said?  

Who  should  be  talked  to?    

What  does  the  plan  seeks  to  achieve?    

What  is  the  problem?    

one  of  the  main  weaknesses  in  public  relaKons  planning  is  se{ng  

What  does  the  plan  seeks  to  achieve?    

як  ви  гадаєте,  чому?  

either  because  they  describe  processes  (‘organize  a  press  

event’)  rather  than  end  points  

or  because  they  are  so  vague  that  they  are  useless  as  success  (or  otherwise)  cannot  be  

established  

objecKves  se{ng  weaknesses  

Anne Gregory, 2009

objecKves  se{ng  

objecKves  set  at  one  of  three  levels  

• AhenKon  • A{tude  • AcKon  

objecKves  should  be  SMART    

• specific  • measurable  • achievable  •  resourced  • Kme  bound  

objecKves  are  organizaKonally  

relevant  and  deliverable  

• All  the  PR  objecKves  are  organizaKonal  objecKves  

• Ensure  the  objecKves  are  PR  objecKves  

• Promise  what  is  achievable  

• Work  to  prioriKes  

не  бійтеся  to  quesKon  objecKves!  

Analysis  and  Research  

What  is  the  problem?    

Що  дає?  

• Розуміння  issues  and  opportuniKes  

• Виявляє  які  дії  треба  зробити  

Що  аналізуємо?  

• Environment  (організацію  та  контекст)  

• Publics  

Як?  

• Informal  research  

• Formal  research  

Analysis  and  Research  

Who  should  be  talked  to?    

stakeholders  &  publics  

меппінг  сегментування  

by geographic - where they live, work by demographics - age, gender, income by psychographics - attitudes, opinions by group memberships - e.g. clubs, societies

messages  and  content  

What  should  be  said?  

кроки  у  формуванні  повідомлень  

take  exisKng  arKculated  percepKons  that  encapsulate  the  issue  of  problem  

define  what  realisKc  shits  can  be  made  in  those  percepKons  

IdenKfy  realisKc  elements  of  persuasion  (раціональні  і  емоційні;  цифри  і  факти/історії  і  приклади)  

ensure  that  the  message  or  content  is  deliverable  and  credible  through  PR  acKvity  

How  the  message  should  be  communicated?  

strategy  

-­‐  overall  concept,  

approach  or  general  plan  

-­‐  the  coordinaKng  theme  or  factor  

-­‐  the  guiding  principle  or  purpose  

-­‐  the  big  idea  

-­‐  the  raKonale  behind  the  program  

TacKcs  

Is  the  tacKc  appropriate?  

Is  the  tacKc  deliverable?  

Timescale  and  resources  

Kme  

resource  

How  is  success  to  be  judged?    

•  EffecKve  evaluaKon  starts  with  effecKve  objecKve  se{ng.  At  its  simplest,  PR  evaluaKon  is  simply  checking  that  the  objecKves  set  have  been  met.  

•  EvaluaKon  is  a  research-­‐based  discipline.  All  public  relaKons  pracKKoners  need  to  have  some  understanding  of  research  methods.  

•  EvaluaKon  focuses  on  the  process  of  public  relaKons  acKvity.  The  more  effecKve  the  process,  the  more  likely  the  impacts  sought  will  be  achieved.  

•  EvaluaKon  also  focuses  on  the  impact  of  public  relaKons  acKvity.  The  ulKmate  purpose  of  public  relaKons  acKvity  is  the  impact  on  the  publics  being  addressed.  

•  EvaluaKon  is  user-­‐dependent.  The  success  of  public  relaKons  acKvity  is  judged  on  the  criteria  important  to  the  client  or  employer  concerned.  

EffecKve  approach  

to  evaluaKon  

•  Se{ng  SMART  objecKves  •  Building  in  evaluaKon  from  the  start  •  Agreeing  measurement  criteria  with  whomever  will  be  judging  success  

•  EvaluaKng  and  monitoring  as  the  campaign  progresses  

•  Taking  an  objecKve  and  scienKfic  approach  •  EvaluaKng  processes  •  Establishing  open  and  transparent  monitoring  processes,  through  for  example,  monthly  review  reports.  

principles    that  can  help  to  make  

evaluaKon  easier  

Оксана  Гошва  +38044  364  14  33  (office)  

+38050  384  71  78  (mob)  

hoshva@hoshvapr.com.ua