1 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 The Dirt on Dirt PART 3...

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views 2 download

Tags:

transcript

1

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

11

The Dirt on DirtPART 3 – SOIL MANAGEMENT

2

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

REVIEW Parts 1 & 2 focused on the elements of

Soil Science In essence –

“what you have”

3

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

IN THIS SECTION WE WILL COVER Fertility Drainage Erosion Tillage Conservation

4

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

FERTILITY We discussed testing, pH and essential

nutrients

5

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO? Know what you are going to grow and

what was grown the past several years What is the history of previous fertilizer

(and manure) applications Obtain your soil test results and

recommendations from your state’s Land Grant University

Consider pH goals

6

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

BRINGING IN SOIL QUALITY Higher levels of organic matter lessen the

need for fertilizer inputs Better soil structure leads to better plant

efficiency for capturing available fertility

7

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

DON’T FORGET Many water quality issues are related to

excess or improper fertilizer applications Know Best

Management Practices (BMPs)

8

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSIDER Is the nutrient mobile in the environment? What fertilizer product you will use? When will you put it on? Basic Agronomy

9

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

LAST SESSION We discussed soil structure at length Review

– Good structure promotes increased root growth which leads to increased plant growth

– More efficient use of soil fertility– Poor structure results in wet, poorly drained

soils

10

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

DRAINAGE Artificial drainage utilizes perforated plastic

pipe to remove excess water Water will only flow if the soil is saturated

11

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND Design should be engineered Remember environmental consequence Draining wetlands is not advisable and

potentially illegal

12

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

BENEFITS OF DRAINAGE Increased productivity (economic and

environmental) Improved soil structure (due to increased

biological activity) Reduction in the loss

of most contaminants Reduced soil erosion

13

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

EROSION Soil moving off site Wind and Water

What do these

two things have

in common?

14

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

AT ITS MOST BASIC LEVEL Soil particles must be dislodged if they are

going to move

15

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WIND EROSION Soil particles are knocked loose by other

soil particles Cover the soil with either

residue or a growing crop to prevent

Take steps to reduce wind speed

16

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WATER EROSION Soil particles knocked loose by raindrops

The solution – cover the soil with a growing crop or residue

17

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WATER EROSION Soil dislodged by moving water and other

soil particles Factors involved

– Slope steepness and

length– Water velocity when

running off– Some soil types are

more “erosive”

18

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WATER EROSION SUMMARIZED A growing crop buffers raindrop impact

and slows water runoff Residue serves the same purpose when

there is not a growing crop Shorten slope length with engineering

structures Plant permanent cover in places where

water wants to run

19

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

IN ADDITION Most people learn better when information

is repeated We will revisit this later when we discuss

conservation

20

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

TILLAGE Why do we till?

– Residue reflects light and protects from the wind – so high residue levels can lead to cool, wet soil

– Seeds need heat to germinate, the growing season is shorter the farther north you go

21

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

BUT REMEMBER? Tillage destroys soil structure Buries or destroys residue that protects

from erosion

22

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

THE ANSWER The world isn’t perfect, it is pretty hard to

have it all

23

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WHO SAID THIS WOULD BE EASY? All management decisions need to be site

and circumstance specific It should be

possible to strike a balance between conservation and

necessary tillage

24

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

IN GENERAL NRCS recommends at least 30% residue

cover at the time of planting

25

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION First and foremost – Familiarize yourself

with your local resources– Natural Resources Conservation Service– Conservation Districts– Extension– Others?

26

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

YOUR CONSERVATION TOOLBOX No-Till, Strip-Till, Mulch-Till

27

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION TOOLBOX Grass waterways and buffer strips

28

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION TOOLBOX Contour planting Contour strips

29

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION TOOLBOX Engineered solutions

– Sediment basins– Terraces– Drop structures– Side inlet structures– Many more

30

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION TOOLBOX Perennial cover

– Pasture– Wildlife habitat– Cover crops?

31

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

CONSERVATION TOOLBOX Windbreaks, shelterbelts, living snow

fences = trees

32

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

IN CONCLUSION We have covered the information, now lets

move on to…

Your Plan!

33

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

YOUR PLAN Evaluate what you have

– Soil survey and descriptions– Soil test– Use history– Existing problems

34

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

YOUR PLAN Your Goals

– How do you plan to use your land?– Crops? Pasture? Native landscape?– Bring soil quality into your plans

Soil structure Organic matter Fertility Conservation

35

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

YOUR PLAN Action Items

– Cropping– Drainage and/or engineering– Ground preparation– Fertility– Conservation

36

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

YOUR PLAN Formulate what you think you should do Then consult resource people to get their

opinions

37

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

IN THE END

Stay flexible – Things change Keep an open mind – You just might get

some good advice Stay goal oriented

– Everything doesn’t happen all at once

Stop to smell the soil

38

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

WISHING YOU MANY HAPPY HARVESTS – WHETHER IT IS CROPS, OR JUST SUNSHINE AND FRESH AIR!

39

© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this PowerPoint is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to the Extension Store at 800-876-8636.

Thank You!

This product was developed with support from the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture — National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed

within do not necessarily reflect the view of the SARE program or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.