Post on 21-Dec-2015
transcript
1 P E
Aalborg7th Nov. 2002
Partners In Projects
Aalborg 7th November 2002
Experience from framework programme projects.
Fernando Ubieta
INNOPOLE, Spain
2 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
3 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
4
More than just money!!More than just money!!
Achieving global consensus
Accessing best technological know-how
Accelerating integration
Strengthening business cooperation
Coping with the IT-skill shortage
Closing the digital divide
Why we recommend to be active
under EC Framework Programme?
5 P E
EC Funding helps companies to develop (products, services, technologies, etc).
But the majority of companies experiencing RTD collaborative projects consider cooperation and “knowledge” transfer the key asset.
Only for money better try elsewhere.
6 P E
- Are too bureaucratic?
- Are too complex for newcomers?
- No chances for SMEs?
- Too much “precompetitive” RTD?
I will explain our experience being SME, having been able to submit, have approved & manage EC RTD projects achieving exploitable results.
Some EC RTD Myths
7 P E
- Are too bureaucratic? – Not too much, some National funding schemes are similar for less available resources.
Project selection is based on competitive evaluations.
Proposers need to demonstrate that it is worth for EC to invest resources in the proposed action.
All will have to have similar opportunities.
Average project dimension is big so EC bureaucratic requirements are necessary.
Some EC RTD Myths
8 P E
- Are too complex for newcomers?
EU projects are complex (if you are not used to them). New comers should look for adequate participation schemes (take advantage of others` experiences, play a leading role only after a first experience, etc)
Some EC RTD Myths
9 P E
- No chances for SMEs?
In the Vth FP e.g IST KAII, >35% out of 1500 participants were SMES.
In the VIth FP minimum 15% of budget will have to go to SMEs.
SMEs have played a role as IT developers and IT users.
Very good chances for SMEs.
Some EC RTD Myths
10 P E
- Too much “precompetitive” RTD?
There is precompetitive RTD as it has to…
There are nevertheless chances for other schemes (in the Vth FP Take-up, Best Practices, Accompanying measures), all Ips will have to include implementation, dissemination , training, pilots, etc
Some EC RTD Myths
11 P E
I will explain our experience being SME, having been able to submit, have approved & manage EC RTD projects achieving exploitable results.
Some EC RTD Myths
12 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
13 P E
INNOPOLEConsultants in Technology
and Innovation.
We deal with people…Who make business with us to get busines
and personal reward.
14 P E
Some Experiences
VALUE IIIrd Framework Programme, ESPRIT IVth Framework Programme, IST Vth FP. Proposal evaluation.
IVth FP SMT Finished Project evaluation. IST Vth FP reviewer. ESPRIT (DonQ CIM, Qshop, BEP IiM) ERDF (IMPLACE).
AFORO Roadmap IST-2001-37258 Project Coordinator (actual).
National and Regional RTD Programmes and projects evaluation.
New Technology Based Firms strategy & training. Plans for the Exploitation of RTD results Management of complex projects. Technology Transfer to SMEs.
15 P E
Regional Dissemination Programmes in Castilla – La Mancha,Basque Country, Catalonia, Castilla – Leon, Northern Ireland,Porto Region, Bremen.
Services to companies in the definition of technologydevelopment and implementation strategies.
Business Plans and setting-up New Technology Based Firms. RTD Project and Programme evaluation (EC III, IV, V Framework
Programmes, Spanish Ministry for Industry, CLM Ministry for Industry, Basque Government Ministry for Industry).
Project Management KNOBA EA 5602, ESPRIT DonQ CIM EP8883, ERDF IMPLACE, ESPRIT BEP-IiM EP24024, ESPRIT Qshop EP22590, IST ECLAIR. MCYT TICTRAD2000, MCYT PROMARCO (I & II). JCCM PROMOTOR (RIS+), AFORO IST – 2002-37258
Some Experiences
16 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
17 P E
Dynamics ofFramework Programme
1
8
62
5 3
7
4
FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
SPECIFIC PROGRAMMES
WORKPROGRAMMES
CALL FOR PROPOSALS (nov 2002/April 2003)
EVALUATION
SELECTION OFPROPOSALS
NEGOTIATION ANDSIGNATURE OFCONTRACTS
PROJECTS
We are here
18 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
19 P E
Tip 1
• DECIDE QUICKLY
• Evaluate YOUR interests – and ideas - and available opportunities and take a decission (a risk?)
20 P E
Decision I
The present situation is excellent to evaluate potential interest in joining EC RTD projects.
• Documents available• Calls ready to be open• Whole Budget available• OPORTUNITY
21 P E
• Understand process and mechanisms. • Decide on business reasons for
participation:– Opening up your business to Europe– Creating synergy with European Industry– Getting complementary expertise,technology
transfer, etc.– Getting funding for your dream project
Decision II
22 P E
1. Which Priority(s) are of your research interest?
2. What specifically do you want out of it?- in business and technical terms
3. Which resources are you willing to invest?4. What type or specific partners do you wish
to work with?5. What expertise are you willing to apply?
Decision III
23 P E
Tip 2
• SELECT THE DOMAIN ADEQUATELY
• Ethere are too many possibilities. Analyse all carefully and select most sensible/promising ones.
24 P E
• Study Workprogramme and decide which Action Line best fits your idea.
• Find out types of projects supported by that action line (RTD, IPs, NoE, Accompanying,..)
• Identify Call and timetable i.e. closing date(s)• Build a consortium (or join a suitable one).• Prepare draft document (proposal skeleton)• Research background i.e. current projects, EoIs• Contact the related Commission Project Officer
If you decide to go on
25 P E
Which Research Priority?
Health & Safety
Nanotechnologies
ENERGY
ENVIRONMENT
26 P E
Strategic objectives addressed in Call 1
Pushing the limits of CMOS, preparing for post-CMOS
Micro and nano-systems
Broadband Access for All
Mobile and wireless systems beyond 3G
Towards a global dependability and security framework
Multimodal interfaces
Semantic-based knowledge systems
Networked audiovisual systems and home platforms
Networked organisations, businesses and governments
eSafety of road and air transports
e Health
Technology-enhanced learning and access to cultural heritage
WhichArea?
WhichCall?
27 P E
Select Instrument / project type
• Integrated Project• Network of Excellence• Targeted Research• Other smaller projects (will have 30% of total
budget)• Accompanying Measures, Dissemination,..
• (If they exist in your Research Priority)
28 P E
Decide Consortium (draft)
• Wich role are you playing (coordinator, partner)• With whom do you want to cooperate.• With whom are you already cooperating.• Wich experience/knowledge is needed.
• Prepare draft structure.
• Or look for existing one to join
29 P E
+40%of a good proposal ....
...lies in the process from the first idea to the elaboration of the outline
The PROPOSAL
30 P E
From idea to proposal
31 P E
Proposal is a “marketing” tool
Will be the ONLY evaluable document the evaluators may use.
Proposal = RTD Challenge + Consortium + Workplan + Budget + Exploitation.
32 P E
BUSINESS PROJECT IDEA
PROPOSAL IDEA
European Dimension Int. Cooperation Innovation level Critical mass
Factors which force a ‘re-thinking’
DO WE HAVE IDEASDO WE HAVE IDEAS
33 P E
PROJECT IDEA
EUROPEANPROPOSAL
PROJECT PLAN
34 P E
Steps to prepare RTD Proposals
Produce a brief document covering the following -1. Which Thematic Priority is addressed?2. Expected results?3. What is innovative?4. How does it compare to current technology?5. What is the market and route to market?6. What are major activities required?7. What skills and effort required for each?8. What is profile of organisation needed for each?
Validation with “closest partners” & project officers in Brussels
35 P E
Refine consortium & Proposal
• If feedback from EC and other partners is OK go ahead to refine your proposal.
• Partners` search• Final Proposal Preparation.
36 P E
Parts of a proposal (Parts B & C)
• Scientific/technological quality & innovation
• Community added value & contribution to EC policies
• Contribution to Community social objectives
• Economic development and S&T prospects
• Resources, partnership & management
37 P E
How the Proposals are Evaluated
• Sources of information• Evaluation process RTD• Evaluation criteria• Scoring• Weights & Thresholds• Scientific technical quality& innovation• Economic development & S&T prospects• Financial evaluation
FIFTH FrameworkProgramme
38 P E
Sources of information
• Proposers` Guide - Parts 1 and 2
• Guidelines for Evaluators participating in the evaluation of proposals of the IST Program
• FP5 Evaluation Manual
• Workprogramme
• Call for proposals
39 P E
Evaluation Process RTD
Step 1 Opening, registration & preparation
Step 2 Eligibility check - (deadline, signature, consortium eligibility, anonymity of Part B, in scope of key action)
Step 3 Evaluation of Part B by three evaluators
Step 4 Evaluation of Part C by same three evaluators
Step 5 Consensus meeting among the evaluators
Step 6 Ranking Panel (All the evaluators, project officers, head of unit)
40 P E
Evaluation Criteria ?¿
Criterion
1 Scientific/technological quality & innovation
2 Community added value & contribution to policies
3 Contribution to Community social objectives
4 Economic development and S&T prospects
5 Resources, partnership & management
41 P E
Scoring
Evaluators score each criterion 0-5 with 0 being low and 5 high
0 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
2 - Fair
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Excellent
Only excellent ones will assure selection
42 P E
Weights & Thresholds
Scores on each criterion is 0-5 with 5 best
For RTD (Different thresholds for different types):Criterion Weight Threshold 1 4 3 2 1 2 3 1 - 4 2 3 5 2 2
43 P E
This is Your Project Idea
44 P E
Partner Search
Most difficult point for new entrants - first project is the most difficult
Sources• CORDIS• Info days/events: best source• Current projects: excellent - major players• Consultants: some are very good• NCPs: some countries give good support• Concertation events etc: can be excellent
45 P E
Roles of Partners
• There must be players for the following roles:– Technology developer
– End user
– A partner with proven market access potential
• What is unique contribution of each partner?• Do you have more than one technological contributor?• Do you have an end user?• Do you have a partner with proven market access
potential?
46 P E
How to maximize the success rate?
• First timers should not try to coordinate• Try to get into a proposal with a major player• Make sure the proposal falls clearly into an Priority
Thematic Area• Make sure that for RTD, innovation is shown• Ensure you have key end users involved• Ensure you have a major market player in• Read the instructions and follow all of them
47 P E
Summary
• Check related existing projects• Validate with NCP/Project Officer• Write down an outline proposal: Breakdown into
Workpackages/Tasks/Roles• Get partners written agreement to participate• Split between partners and agree each’s work• Validate resource estimates and costs/iterate• Complete proposal draft and review• Finalise and submit on time
48 P E
Index
• Introduction. Why EU RTD projects?
• INNOPOLE brief presentation.
• Dynamics of Framework Programmes.
• Tips for participation
• Examples: RURAL WINS, AFORO
49 P E
IST- Strategic RoadmapRURAL WINS
Broadband solutions and Applications for Rural Areas and Maritime Regions
Thematic NetworkLeader: EUSKALTEL (Spanish regional telco)
31 partners from 14 states (incl NAS)Keywords: Wireless, Satellite, Knowledge mangt., e-inclusion, Public-private business
models, EC e-Rural policy.
50 P E
Technology providers
Rural devpt agencies
Telecom operatorsService providers
Government
Regulatory bodies
EC directorates
Technology providers Rural devpt agenciesTelecom operators
Service providers
GovernmentRegulatory bodiesEC directorates
LARGE CONSTITUENCYWP4
PROJECT SAMPLE
Needs analysisWP1
Tech mapsWP2
BusinessModels
WP3
ROADMAPWP5
DisseminationWP4
Input from project constituency sample Feedback from project
constituency sample
Dissemination toconstituency
51 P E
IST- Strategic RoadmapAFORO
A vision and workplan to implement future RTD trends for the transformation of agri-
food industries into digital companies.
Thematic Network
Leader: INNOPOLE (Spanish technology consult.)
18 partners from 14 states (incl NAS)
Keywords: Electronic markets, traceability, quality control, networks, SCM, GIS, automation.
52 P E
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …
Meta Model Analysis of A & B to locate position on a continuum …
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Perform Risk Analysis to selectOptimal path from A to B and towards C
Feedback
A B CPast Future
© CIMRU, 2002
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …
Meta Model Analysis of A & B to locate position on a continuum …
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Perform Risk Analysis to selectOptimal path from A to B and towards C
Feedback
A B CPast Future
© CIMRU, 2002
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
(A) AS-IS SituationPresent State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) AS-IS Situation
Present State
(A)(A) ASAS--ISIS SituationSituationPresent State(A) As-Is Situation
Present State
(A)(A) AsAs--IsIs SituationSituationPresent State
(B) To-Be SituationDesired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision(B) To-Be Situation
Desired Vision
(B)(B) ToTo--BeBe SituationSituationDesired Vision
Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …Knowledge Acquisition: Structured questionnaires, checklists and benchmarks …
Meta Model Analysis of A & B to locate position on a continuum …
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
ImplementationTest & Evaluate
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Requirements AnalysisProject Planning
Design and Development
Perform Risk Analysis to selectOptimal path from A to B and towards C
Feedback
A B CPast Future
© CIMRU, 2002
53 P E
FP6 - Instruments
Centres Centres ofofExcellenceExcellence
RTD projectsRTD projects
NATIONAL RTDNATIONAL RTDPROGRAMMESPROGRAMMES
(Art 169)(Art 169)
NETWORK OFNETWORK OFEXCELLENCEEXCELLENCE
INTEGRATEDINTEGRATEDPROJECTPROJECT
54 P E
Contact
THANK YOU
Further contact:
www.innopole.net
www.aforo.net
fubieta@innopole.net