1 ARGENTINA: CRISIS AND RECOVERY Mario I. Blejer.

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views 0 download

transcript

1

ARGENTINA: CRISIS AND RECOVERY

Mario I. Blejer

2

Monthly Gross Domestic Productseasonally adjusted (Jan 98 = 100)

98,3Dec 00

82.2Nov 02

94,6Jul 99

99,0Dec 99

102,3Jun 98

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

105.0

Jan

-98

Ma

r-9

8

Ma

y-9

8

Jul-9

8

Se

p-9

8

No

v-9

8

Jan

-99

Ma

r-9

9

Ma

y-9

9

Jul-9

9

Se

p-9

9

No

v-9

9

Jan

-00

Ma

r-0

0

Ma

y-0

0

Jul-0

0

Se

p-0

0

No

v-0

0

Jan

-01

Ma

r-0

1

Ma

y-0

1

Jul-0

1

Se

p-0

1

No

v-0

1

Jan

-02

Ma

r-0

2

Ma

y-0

2

Jul-0

2

Se

p-0

2

No

v-0

2

Source: CEA-UCEMA en base a datos del INDEC.

3

Monthly Gross Domestic Productseasonally adjusted (Jan 98 = 100)

98,3Dec 00

82.2Nov 02

94,6Jul 99

99,0Dec 99

102,3Jun 98

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

105.0

Jan

-98

Ma

r-9

8

Ma

y-9

8

Jul-9

8

Se

p-9

8

No

v-9

8

Jan

-99

Ma

r-9

9

Ma

y-9

9

Jul-9

9

Se

p-9

9

No

v-9

9

Jan

-00

Ma

r-0

0

Ma

y-0

0

Jul-0

0

Se

p-0

0

No

v-0

0

Jan

-01

Ma

r-0

1

Ma

y-0

1

Jul-0

1

Se

p-0

1

No

v-0

1

Jan

-02

Ma

r-0

2

Ma

y-0

2

Jul-0

2

Se

p-0

2

No

v-0

2

Source: CEA-UCEMA en base a datos del INDEC.

WHAT CAUSED THE CRISIS?

4

Monthly Gross Domestic Productseasonally adjusted (Jan 98 = 100)

98,3Dec 00

82.2Nov 02

94,6Jul 99

99,0Dec 99

102,3Jun 98

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

105.0

Jan

-98

Ma

r-9

8

Ma

y-9

8

Jul-9

8

Se

p-9

8

No

v-9

8

Jan

-99

Ma

r-9

9

Ma

y-9

9

Jul-9

9

Se

p-9

9

No

v-9

9

Jan

-00

Ma

r-0

0

Ma

y-0

0

Jul-0

0

Se

p-0

0

No

v-0

0

Jan

-01

Ma

r-0

1

Ma

y-0

1

Jul-0

1

Se

p-0

1

No

v-0

1

Jan

-02

Ma

r-0

2

Ma

y-0

2

Jul-0

2

Se

p-0

2

No

v-0

2

Source: CEA-UCEMA en base a datos del INDEC.

HOW THE RECOVERY WAS MANAGED

5

Real GDP (base 1993)

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

I-98

III-98

I-99

III-99

I-00

III-00

I-01

III-01

I-02

III-02

I-03

III-03

I-04

III-04

I-05

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

var. a/aPBI real

6

CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

THREE APPROACHES:

1. The loss of competitiveness of the Argentine economy

2. The “Sudden Stop” argument

3. Macroeconomic policy inconsistencies

7

Loss of Competitiveness under the Fixed (Convertibility) Exchange Rate Regime

Tradables/non tradables (WPI/CPI)

Convertibility average101

224220

148

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

250

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

Ene

-02

Mar

-02

May

-02

Jul-

02

Sep

-02

Nov

-02

Ene

-03

ind

ex 2

001=

100

8

-10.000

-5.000

0

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

196

9

197

0

19

71

19

72

19

73

19

74

19

75

19

76

19

77

19

78

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

million of USD

The Trade Account (in current prices)

9

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

IV 9

4

IV 9

5

IV 9

6

IV 9

7

IV 9

8

IV.

99

IV.

00

IV 0

1

-35.000

-30.000

-25.000

-20.000

-15.000

-10.000

-5.000

0

5.000

10.000

15.000

Capital Flows and Economic Activity Capital Flows and Economic Activity (Accumulated 4 quarters - U$Sm. GDP Cyclical Component)(Accumulated 4 quarters - U$Sm. GDP Cyclical Component)

Capital Flows Private Sector

GDP Growth Russian Crisis

10

Fiscal DeficitsArgentina 1975-2001

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

Convertibility Period

11

The Use of Privatization Receipts to Reduce the Deficit

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

Total Deficit

PrivatizationRevenue

12

Interest Payments/GDP

0

5

10

15

20

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

13

Primary Expenditures as % of GDP(cumulative 12 months)

17,0%

17,5%

18,0%

18,5%

19,0%

19,5%

Dic

-97

Ma

r-9

8

Ju

n-9

8

Se

p-9

8

Dic

-98

Ma

r-9

9

Ju

n-9

9

Se

p-9

9

Dic

-99

Ma

r-0

0

Ju

n-0

0

Se

p-0

0

Dic

-00

Ma

r-0

1

Ju

n-0

1

Se

p-0

1

Dic

-01

Ma

r-0

2

Ju

n-0

2

Se

p-0

2

Dic

-02

14

Primary Expenditures as % of GDP(cumulative 12 months)

17,0%

17,5%

18,0%

18,5%

19,0%

19,5%D

ic-9

7

Ma

r-9

8

Ju

n-9

8

Se

p-9

8

Dic

-98

Ma

r-9

9

Ju

n-9

9

Se

p-9

9

Dic

-99

Ma

r-0

0

Ju

n-0

0

Se

p-0

0

Dic

-00

Ma

r-0

1

Ju

n-0

1

Se

p-0

1

Dic

-01

Ma

r-0

2

Ju

n-0

2

Se

p-0

2

Dic

-02

15

First Symptom: The Banking Crisis

While the problems of convertibility and the

consequent exchange rate uncertainty

played a role, the banking crisis was

largely caused by the government

“abuse” of the banking sector, given its

inability to to adjust the budget deficit

16

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Sep 00 Dec 00 Mar 01 Jun 01 Ago 01 Nov 01 Feb 02 Apr 02 Jul 02

"

“Corralito”

Devaluation

Private Sector Deposits (in bn Arg. Private Sector Deposits (in bn Arg. Pesos)Pesos)

17

The main cause for the banking crisis was the fear was that banks would be rendered insolvent by government policy and that deposits would be confiscated.

An important reason behind this fear was the fact that private sector assets were being displaced by public sector assets in bank’s balance sheets.

18

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Dec-99 May-00 Oct-00 Mar-01 Aug-01 Jan-02 Jun-02

Public Sector Private Sector

Private Sector assets have been displaced by Public Sector assets in

bank’s balance sheets

$ 76 MM

$ 43 MM

19

The increasing banking exposure to the public sector was accompanied by

1. a rapid decrease in deposits and

2. a sharp increase in country risk

20

Exposición del Sistema Financiero al Riesgo del Sector Público

71

151

104

216

80

100

60

100

140

180

220

dic-98 jun-99 dic-99 jun-00 dic-00 jun-01 dic-01

70

80

90

100

110

Indice EMBI Argentina

Crédito al Sector Público / Patrimonio Neto (en %)

Depósitos Sector Privado - Base dic2000 = 100 (2º eje)

EMBI Index

Public Sector Loans / Net Worth (%) Private Deposists - Index Dec 00 = 100 (2nd axis)

21

• November 2001:withdrawal restrictions on bank deposits (“corralito”).

• December 2001: Riots and the De la Rua and Cavallo government falls.

• First two weeks of January 2002: --currency board is abandoned and the currency devalued --bank assets and liabilities are pesified asymmetrically - i.e. at different rates

22

The Tradeoffs and the Dilemma for the Central Bank

Having regained the LOLR function the CB could provide the liquidity needed to finance the bank run. Pesos would fly to the exchange market – risk of hyperdevaluation and hyperinflation.

OR

23

The CB could restrain the rediscount facility and let banks deal with the deposit run. May prevent hyperinflation, at the risk of the total collapse of the banking sector.

24

The Strategy Followed

1. Default on the Sovereign Debt

2. Provide liquidity support to banks to prevent massive bank closures.

3. Develop sterilization instruments at the Central Bank --the LEBAC-- to mop up liquidity and to compete with the U$S.

4. Utilize part of CB reserves to intervene in the foreign exchange market to slow the pace of depreciation and to avoid chaotic conditions.

25

On the Fiscal Side

• Cut significantly fiscal expenditures, mainly through the non-adjustment of wages in the face of 40% inflation.

• Increase Export Taxes on Agricultural and Natural Resources

26

• Monetary and Fiscal Measures, plus regaining competitiveness, helped to achieve twin balance in the Fiscal and External Accounts.

• External (and crucial factor): Major improvement in terms of trade

27

MIB

marioblejer@blejer.com

Soybean Prices - Index

January 2001 – March 2011

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

en

e-0

1a

br-0

1ju

l-01

oct-0

1e

ne

-02

ab

r-02

jul-0

2o

ct-02

en

e-0

3a

br-0

3ju

l-03

oct-0

3e

ne

-04

ab

r-04

jul-0

4o

ct-04

en

e-0

5a

br-0

5ju

l-05

oct-0

5e

ne

-06

ab

r-06

jul-0

6o

ct-06

en

e-0

7a

br-0

7ju

l-07

oct-0

7e

ne

-08

ab

r-08

jul-0

8o

ct-08

en

e-0

9a

br-0

9ju

l-09

oct-0

9e

ne

-10

ab

r-10

jul-1

0o

ct-10

en

e-1

1

130%

28

Initially deposit withdrawals continued

Private Sector Deposits - Year 2002

-2609

-4335 -4378 -4526

-998

160

-235 -340

-823 -810-1274 -1230

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

Feb Mar Abr May Jun JulIn million of pesos

Deposits minus preventive measures Preventive measures

29

However, the trend reversed after four months

Private Sector Deposits - Year 2002

-2609

-4335 -4378 -4526

-998

160

-235 -340

-823 -810-1274 -1230

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

Feb Mar Abr May Jun JulIn million of pesos

Deposits minus preventive measures Preventive measures

30

Private Sector Deposits(in billion pesos)

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

01-Oct-01 27-Nov-01 23-Jan-02 21-Mar-02 17-May-02 13-Jul-02 18-Oct-02 04-Nov-02 31-Dec-02

Devaluation

Withdrawal

Restrictions

"Corralito"

Recovery

Reprogramming

Pesification

31

International ReservesIn U$S millions

32Fuente:Indec

Total GDPQuarterly – Seasonally Adjusted

220

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

I98 II98 III98 IV98 I99 II99 III99 IV99 I00 II00 III00 IV00 I01 II01 III01 IV01 I02 II02 III02 IV02 I03 II03 III03 IV03

33Fuente: Universidad Di Tella

Labor Demand

20

40

60

80

100

120

J an-00 J ul-00 J an-01 J ul-01 J an-02 J ul-02 J an-03

34Fuente: Universidad Di Tella

Consumers and Business CONFIDENCE

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

Dic '99 Mar '00 J un '00 Sep '00 Dic '00 Mar '01 J un '01 Sep '01 Dic '01 Mar '02 J un '02 Sep '02 Dic '02 Mar '03 J un '03

CONSUMERS

BUSINESS

35

• In 2005 the Debt in Default was Exchanged for new debt with an average 75% haircut.

36

Real GDP (base 1993)

DebtExchange

37

• A second exchange took place 5 years later.

• There is today around 10% holdouts

• The Debt to the IMF was fully repaid

• Debt with the Paris Club is being negotiated

.

38

COMPARATIVE DEBTCOMPARATIVE DEBTARGENTINA and RUSSIA ARGENTINA and RUSSIA (then)(then) AND EUROPE AND EUROPE (now)(now)

39

THANK YOU!