transcript
- Slide 1
- 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Terms F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu
- Slide 2
- So now we have an enforceable contract But what is its content?
2
- Slide 3
- Identifying the Terms and Interpreting them Identifying: what
are the terms Interpreting: what do they mean? Conditions and
Warranties Mistake 3
- Slide 4
- Identifying the Terms and Interpreting them In any event, do we
look outside a written contract? Oral statements Course of dealings
Trade customs 4
- Slide 5
- Some jargon What is Parol Evidence? The Parol Evidence Rule as
a legal presumption 5
- Slide 6
- Some jargon What is Parol Evidence? The Parol Evidence Rule as
a legal presumption Merger Clauses 6
- Slide 7
- Some jargon What is Parol Evidence? The Parol Evidence Rule as
a legal presumption Merger Clauses Textualism 7
- Slide 8
- Some jargon What is Parol Evidence? The Parol Evidence Rule as
a legal presumption Merger Clauses Textualism Four Corners rule
8
- Slide 9
- Some jargon Textualism and Contextualism 9
- Slide 10
- What would we lose if we banned written contracts? Certainty as
to terms Recall the rationale for the Statute of Frauds in McIntosh
p. 518 10
- Slide 11
- What would we lose if we banned written contracts? Certainty as
to terms Adjudication and Litigation Costs 11
- Slide 12
- What would we lose if we banned written contracts? Certainty as
to terms Adjudication and Litigation Costs Agency Costs of Sellers
Agents 12
- Slide 13
- What happens where there is a writing? First question: Is this
a binding contract? 13 Lady Gaga signs an autograph
- Slide 14
- First question: Is this part of a binding contract? Recall
Merit Music at 429 I imagined it was a note. 14 What happens where
there is a writing?
- Slide 15
- First question: Is this part of a binding contract? Signed
writings: Restatement 211(a) 15 What happens where there is a
writing?
- Slide 16
- First question: Is this part of a binding contract? Non est
factum: Restatement 163, Illustration 2 Restatement 211(c), 214(d)
16 What happens where there is a writing? 16
- Slide 17
- First question: Is this part of a binding contract? Birmingham
TV p. 431 17 What happens where there is a writing?
- Slide 18
- Can we look behind a signed written contract for the terms of
the contract? Integrated Agreements: Restatement 209(1), comment a
18
- Slide 19
- Can we look behind a signed written contract for the terms of
the contract? Integrated Agreements: Completely and Partially
Integrated Writings: Restatement 210 19
- Slide 20
- Can we look behind a signed written contract for the terms of
the contract? Integrated Agreements: Completely and Partially
Integrated Writings: Restatement 210 Ch 210(3): what happened to
the parol evidence rule? 20
- Slide 21
- Can we look behind a signed written contract for the terms of
the contract? The traditional Parol Evidence Rule Burke at 554 in
Masterson Where the writing is integrated, parol evidence is not
admitted to add to, vary or contradict the writing 21
- Slide 22
- Can we look behind a signed written contract for the terms of
the contract? The traditional Parol Evidence Rule Burke at 554 in
Masterson Where the writing is integrated, parol evidence is not
admitted to add to, vary or contradict the writing Fully integrated
writings: Restatement 213(2) 22
- Slide 23
- Limits to the Parol Evidence Rule Additional terms supplied by
statute or courts Omitted Essential Terms Collateral Agreements
23
- Slide 24
- Limits to the Parol Evidence Rule Additional terms supplied by
statute or courts Good title: UCC 2-312 Merchantability: UCC 2-314
Fitness for purpose: UCC 2-315 24
- Slide 25
- Limits to the Parol Evidence Rule Omitted essential terms:
Restatement 204 The one-year term on employment in McIntosh at 516
25
- Slide 26
- Limits to the Parol Evidence Rule A agrees to sell his house to
B in a signed agreement on Feb. 20. On the same day B sells a
painting to A for $400 in an oral agreement. Problems? 26
- Slide 27
- Limits to the Parol Evidence Rule: Collateral Contracts A
agrees to sell his house to B in a signed agreement on Feb. 20. On
the same day B sells a painting to A for $400 in an oral agreement.
Problems? Two entirely distinct contracts may be made at the same
time, and will be distinct legally. Williston at 546 27
- Slide 28
- Collateral Contracts The test in Mitchill v. Lath 28 Ice
House
- Slide 29
- Collateral Contracts The test in Mitchill v. Lath In form a
collateral agreement Cant contradict the written agreement One that
would not ordinarily be embodied in the written agreement 29
- Slide 30
- Collateral Contracts The test in Mitchill v. Lath In form a
collateral agreement Cant contradict the written agreement One that
would not ordinarily be embodied in the writing What was the oral
agreement here? 30
- Slide 31
- Collateral Contracts The test in Mitchill v. Lath In form a
collateral agreement Cant contradict the written agreement One that
would not ordinarily be embodied in the writing Andrews: s fail no.
3 and maybe no. 2 31
- Slide 32
- Collateral Contracts Would the ice house covenant naturally be
found in the land sale contract? What would Williston say? 32 Chief
Judge Irving Lehman 32
- Slide 33
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine 33 Chief Justice Roger Traynor
Jones v. Ahmanson Escola v. Coca-Cola Pacific Gas infra Perez v.
Sharp
- Slide 34
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine 34 Chief Justice Roger Traynor
Justice Louis H. Burke
- Slide 35
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the deal? 35
- Slide 36
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the deal? 36 Dallas and
Rebecca Masterson Medora and Lu Sine (sister and brother-in-law)
ranch
- Slide 37
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the deal? 37 Dallas and
Rebecca Masterson Medora and Lu Sine (sister and brother-in-law)
Option to repurchase
- Slide 38
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What rights does a trustee in
bankruptcy have? 38
- Slide 39
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What rights does a trustee in
bankruptcy have? The commencement of a case creates an estate. Such
estate is comprised of all the following property: all legal or
equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the
commencement of the case. 39
- Slide 40
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What rights does a trustee in
bankruptcy have? So could the trustee step in the shoes of
Masterson to assert the option What do you infer from the fact that
the trustee wanted to do so? 40
- Slide 41
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the alleged oral
modification? 41
- Slide 42
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
Dallas reserves an option to repurchase which does not convey to
his assigns 42
- Slide 43
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
What happens if an agreement is fully integrated per Traynor?
43
- Slide 44
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
What happens if an agreement is partly integrated per Traynor?
44
- Slide 45
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
How to tell if a writing is completely or partially integrated per
Traynor? 45
- Slide 46
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
How to tell if a writing is completely or partially integrated per
Traynor? Any such collateral agreement must itself be examined??
46
- Slide 47
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
How to tell if a writing is completely or partially integrated per
Traynor? The conception of a writing as wholly and intrinsically
self-determinative??? 47
- Slide 48
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What was the oral modification?
How to tell if a writing is completely or partially integrated per
Traynor? Does that mean that contextualism is imposed in every
case? 48
- Slide 49
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
contextualism? 49
- Slide 50
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
contextualism? the party urging the spoken as against the written
word is most often the economic underdog 50
- Slide 51
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
contextualism? the party urging the spoken as against the written
word is most often the economic underdog Is that the case here?
51
- Slide 52
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
textualism? 52
- Slide 53
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
textualism? Written evidence as more accurate than memory 53
- Slide 54
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
textualism? Written evidence as more accurate than memory Juror
bias 54
- Slide 55
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine What is the policy argument for
textualism? Written evidence as more accurate than memory Juror
bias [Uncertainty and Litigation costs?] 55
- Slide 56
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine Traynor on Parol Evidence Would
the reference excluding assigns naturally be made as a separate
agreement? 56
- Slide 57
- Integration: Masterson v. Sine Traynor on Parol Evidence Would
the reference excluding assigns naturally be made as a separate
agreement? Do you agree with Traynor? 57
- Slide 58
- Masterson Are Burkes charges correct? 58
- Slide 59
- Masterson Are Burkes charges correct? Does this undermine the
security of real estate title searches? 59
- Slide 60
- Masterson Are Burkes charges correct? Opens the door, albeit
unintentionally, to a new technique for defrauding creditors?
60
- Slide 61
- Masterson Are Burkes charges correct? Opens the door, albeit
unintentionally, to a new technique for defrauding creditors? Was
Burke being too generous? 61
- Slide 62
- Masterson Are Burkes charges correct? The change contradicts a
term which would ordinarily be supplied by operation of law.
62
- Slide 63
- How does the Restatement handle this? Which way does the
Restatement come down? Cf. 209(2), 210(3), 214 63
- Slide 64
- How does the Restatement handle this? Which way does the
Restatement come down? But cf. 211(1), 215, 216 64
- Slide 65
- How does the Restatement handle this? Collateral agreements Cf.
216(2)(c) 65
- Slide 66
- How does the Restatement handle this? Collateral agreements Cf.
216 Separate consideration: Illustration 3 Terms omitted naturally:
Illustration 7 66
- Slide 67
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? 67
- Slide 68
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? The writing may be explained or
supplemented with consistent additional terms unless the writing
was intended as complete and exclusive 68
- Slide 69
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Comment 3: would the oral term
certainly have been included in the writing? 69
- Slide 70
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Comment 3: would the oral term
certainly have been included in the writing? How does this compare
with restatement 216(2)(b): would the oral term naturally be
omitted? 70
- Slide 71
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Comment 3: would the oral term
certainly have been included in the writing? How does this compare
with restatement 216(2)(b): would the oral term naturally be
omitted? Which language is narrower? 71
- Slide 72
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Comment 3: would the oral term
certainly have been included in the writing? How does this compare
with restatement 216(2)(b): would the oral term naturally be
omitted? In Masterson, might the term have naturally but not
certainly been included? 72
- Slide 73
- 73 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Terms F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu
- Slide 74
- Next day Scott casebook: Conditions Scott casebook: Warranties
659-68 Scott article on ww.buckleysmix.com under American Illness
74
- Slide 75
- Textualism and Contextualism Departures from Textualism 75
- Slide 76
- Textualism and Contextualism Departures from Textualism
Collateral agreements 76
- Slide 77
- Textualism and Contextualism Departures from Textualism
Collateral agreements Contextualism The prior question of whether a
writing is fully integrated Traynor and the Restatement 77
- Slide 78
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What was the
allegedly omitted term? 78
- Slide 79
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What was the
allegedly omitted term? The option to purchase to be used only if
Doliner shopped Eastern Can around 79
- Slide 80
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What was the
allegedly omitted term? Why do you think Hunt refused to include
the term in the writing? 80
- Slide 81
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What is the standard
for determining whether parol evidence might be considered? 81
- Slide 82
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What is the standard
for determining whether parol evidence might be considered? It is
not sufficient that the existence of the condition is implausible.
It must be impossible. 82
- Slide 83
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What is the standard
for determining whether parol evidence might be considered? What
about Hunts ultimatum? 83
- Slide 84
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Hunt Foods What is the standard
for determining whether parol evidence might be considered? What
about Hunts ultimatum? Were these sophisticated bargainers? 84
- Slide 85
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Snyder p. 560 What was the
alleged omitted term? 85
- Slide 86
- How does UCC 2-202 handle this? Snyder Is a cancellation clause
inconsistent with the written contract? Why might Greenbaum have
wanted to exclude unilateral exit rights? 86
- Slide 87
- What is the effect of a Merger Clause? Traynor at 551 87
- Slide 88
- Merger Clauses Danann at 418 Alleged fraudulent representations
about operating profits on a lease of a building 88
- Slide 89
- The Merger Clause in Danann Absent the merger clause, what
result? The representations would ordinarily be excluded by the
Parole Evidence Rule 89
- Slide 90
- The Merger Clause in Danann Absent the merger clause, what
result? The representations would ordinarily be excluded by the
Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the Parole
Evidence Rule would apply 90
- Slide 91
- The Merger Clause in Danann Absent the merger clause, what
result? The representations would ordinarily be excluded by the
Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the Parole
Evidence Rule would apply, but for the merger clause. 91
- Slide 92
- The Merger Clause in Danann Absent the merger clause, what
result? The representations would ordinarily be excluded by the
Parole Evidence Rule Here however the fraud exception to the Parole
Evidence Rule would apply, but for the merger clause. Was the
draftsmanship important? 92
- Slide 93
- Merger Clauses: UAW 93 Doral Resort and Country Club,
Miami
- Slide 94
- Merger Clauses: UAW You tellin me I should stay at a scab
hotel!!! Concerned Union Executive 94
- Slide 95
- Merger Clauses: UAW Roushs evidence Cf. footnote 20 95
- Slide 96
- Merger Clauses: UAW Can you think of something the UAW could
have done to satisfy its concerns? 96
- Slide 97
- Merger Clauses: UAW Can you think of something the UAW could
have done to satisfy its concerns? Markman: The Parol Evidence Rule
gives the parties the incentive to cure the problem in the express
contract 97
- Slide 98
- Merger Clauses: UAW Can the parties bargain around
contextualism with a merger clause? Markmans spectre of
super-merger clauses 98
- Slide 99
- Merger Clauses: UAW Williston and Corbin on merger clauses Do
they end up in the same place? Dueling quotes from Corbin Pp. 565,
566, 571, 572, 573 99
- Slide 100
- Merger Clauses: UAW Williston and Corbin on merger clauses Do
they end up in the same place? 100
- Slide 101
- Merger Clauses: UAW Does fraud corrupt all? In what
circumstances, per Markman? 101
- Slide 102
- Merger Clauses: UAW What was the allegation of fraud? Did Carol
Management falsely represent that the union clause was in the
contract? Or that there was no merger clause? 102
- Slide 103
- Merger Clauses: UAW What was the allegation of fraud? Keeping
mum about plans for sale of the hotel? Was there an assertion that
CMC or Roush knew that the new owners would fire all the staff. Did
she know she was about to be fired? 103
- Slide 104
- Merger Clauses: UAW On Holbrooks analysis, what does a merger
clause do? 104
- Slide 105
- Merger Clauses: UAW On Holbrooks analysis, what does a merger
clause do? What sense do you make of restatement 216, cmt e
105
- Slide 106
- Merger Clauses: UAW On Holbrooks analysis, what does a merger
clause do? Seibel at 577 on inconspicuous clauses 106
- Slide 107
- Merger Clauses: UAW How would Markman have decided Hachmeister
at p. 572? 107
- Slide 108
- Textualism and Contextualism How would you resolve the debate?
108
- Slide 109
- Textualism and Contextualism How would you resolve the debate?
Do the parties to the contract get a right to choose? 109
- Slide 110
- Textualism and Contextualism How would you resolve the debate?
Do the parties to the contract get a right to choose? Suppose the
presumptive rule is textualism: how might the parties bargain
around this? 110
- Slide 111
- Textualism and Contextualism Suppose the presumptive rule is
textualism: how might the parties bargain around this? Include more
detail Recitals: Whereas. No merger clause 111
- Slide 112
- Textualism and Contextualism Suppose the presumptive rule is
contextualism: how might the parties bargain around this? Trainor?
112
- Slide 113
- Textualism and Contextualism Suppose the presumptive rule is
contextualism: how might the parties bargain around this? Trainor?
Merger Clauses 113
- Slide 114
- Textualism and Contextualism Suppose the presumptive rule is
contextualism: how might the parties bargain around this? Trainor?
Merger Clauses??? Choice of Law 114
- Slide 115
- 115 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Interpretation F.H.
Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu