1st Annual Better Budgeting - Government Finance … · 1st Annual Better Budgeting October 6,...

Post on 02-Apr-2018

219 views 1 download

transcript

1stAnnualBetterBudgeting

October 6, 2016, and January 12, 2017 Copyright 2016 by Government Finance Officers Association

GovernmentFinanceOfficersAssocia2on

Welcomeandintroduction

• GFOA’sFirstAnnualBe)erBudge-ngWebinar•  Anannualtrainingeventforgovernmentbudgetprofessionals•  SimilartoGFOA’sAnnualGovernmentalGAAPUpdate

• Objec;ve•  Tohelpbudgetprofessionalsbe>erservetheneedsofdecisionmakers

• Approach•  Focusonselectedaspectsofthebudgetprocess•  Offerprac;cal;psforimprovement 2

Thisyear’stopics

1.  SeDngupalong-termplanningprocess2.  Crea;ngatrulyeffec;vecapitalbudge;ng

process3.  Be>erassessingthepoten;alimpactof

changesinservicelevel4.  Makingbe>erdecisionsontheappropriate

levelsoffeesandcharges5.  Designingmoreeffec;vemeasuresof

performance6.  Improvingtheprocessofbudge;ngforsalaries

andwages3

“HousekeepingItems”

1.  Thistwo-hourprogramisworth2CPECredits.Allpaidpar;cipantswillreceiveacer;ficatebyregularmailin2-3weeks

2.  Mul;plepar;cipantssharingonecomputerwerecapturedinthetextboxontheregistra;onpage.Ifyouaccidentallyskippedthisstep,youcane-mailthelistofpar;cipantstotraining@gfoa.org

3.  AcopyofthePowerPointslidesareavailableunderthe“resources”tabatthetoprightofthescreen

4.  GFOAstaffareavailableduringtheprogramtoanswercontent-relatedques;ons.Youcansubmitques;onsthroughthe“chat”tab

5.  Pollingques;ons–testmaterial(incorrectanswersdonotaffectCPE).Weencourageyoutopar;cipate

4

Instructors

•  JohnFishbeinSeniorProgramManagerGovernmentFinanceOfficersAssocia;on(GFOA)

•  MichaelBaileyFinanceDirectorCityofRedmond,Washington

5

6

•  Explanatoryslidesoutlinethemajorpointscoveredinthispresenta;on.Theexplana;onsarethenreinforcedwithexamples.

•  Thebulletpointsintheexplanatoryslidesthatarehighlightedinredanditalicizedspecificallyrelatetothecorrespondingexamples.

•  Pleasenotethatthebulletpointsthatarenothighlightedareequallyimportant.

•  Ineachoftheexampleslides,thenameoftheen;tyappearsintheupperrightcorneroftheslideandkeypointsoftheexampleareemphasizedinaredunderline.

Afewnotesabouttheformatofthispresentation…

Part1

•  SeDngupalong-termplanningprocess•  1.1 Convincedecisionmakersoftheneed•  1.2 Developabindingfinancialpolicy•  1.3 Ini-alphase•  1.4 Methodology•  1.5 Decisionphase•  1.6 Execute/monitorphase•  1.7 Communicate

7

1.1Convincedecisionmakersoftheneed

•  ExplainLRFP(Long-RangeFinancialPlanning)•  Findoutanyqualmsorobjec;onsthatthedecisionmakersmayhave

• Diagramtheprocessandwhereitwouldfitin• NoteotherpeergovernmentsthatdoLRFP

8

9

Long-RangeFinancialPlanThefirstdrahoftheredesignedLong-RangeFinancialPlan(LRFP)waspresentedtotheLong-RangeFinancialCommi>eeinApril2015.TheLRFPisintendedtoserveasatoolforfinancialplanninganddecisionmakingintheyearsahead,andtheCityaimstoupdatethisplanannually.TheLRFPisaten-yearforecas;ngmodelfortheGeneralFund.Thisplanshouldbeconsideredaworkingdocumentthatwillconstantlychangeastrendsbegintodevelop.

CityofSantaRosa,California

1.2DevelopabindingGinancialpolicy

• Addlong-rangefinancialplanningtoyourfinancialpolicies

• Numberofyears(-mehorizon)•  Star-ngpoint(baseyear)• Whichfunds(scope)

•  Majorfunds•  Don’tjustfocusonthegeneralfund

•  Thosewithstructuraldeficits•  Aggregatenon-majorfunds

• Whichcategories(content)•  Majorrevenues•  Majorexpendituresordepartments•  Debt

10

11

CityofWilsonville,Oregon

•  Thebaseyearoftheforecastistheadoptedbudgetforthefiscalyear(FY)2014-15.TheadoptedbudgetforFY2014-15isthenadjustedforvariousknownitemsthathaveoccurredsincetheCounciladoptedthebudgetinJune2014,andprojec;onsfor2014-15aredeveloped.Thefive-yearforecastisthengroundedbyCouncilintentandlevelsofserviceasreflectedintheadoptedbudget,adjustedforupdatestorevenuesandexpensesasFY2014-15unfolds.

•  Thisfive-yearforecastaggregatesallpersonnelservicescostsintoonecategory.Keycomponentsofthiscategoryincludewages,re;rement,andhealthinsurance.

1.3Initialphase

• Responsibleparty•  Individual•  Projectteam

• Recognizeanyspecialissues•  Poli;cal•  Legisla;on

•  Linktostrategicplan• Complywithfinancialpolicies• Definepurposeandscope

12

13

Discussiononfutureservicedeliverymergerwilltakeplace.FuturediscussionsanddecisionsonthemostequitablemeansofprovidinglawenforcementserviceswithintheCountymayoccur.DiscussionsmayoccurtoreviewthepossibilityofamergerbetweentheCityandCountyforCrimeScene/ForensicServices.ThepossiblemergeroftheCounty’s911CenterandtheSheriff’sCommunica;onsec;onwillbediscussedinthenearfuture.

ForsythCounty,NorthCarolina

Assump;onsforPublicSafetyServiceArea-Sheriff

1.4Methodology

• Movingaverages• Regression•  Trends

•  Historical•  Structuralimbalances

•  Scenarioanalysis•  Environment

•  Demographics•  Growth•  Composi;on

•  Economy•  Infla;on

14

Belowisthedetailofthecostofes;matedcompensa;onandinsuranceincreasesforcomparisonpurposes($millions).

15

Item 2016Adopted

2017Projected

2018Projected

2019Projected

2020Projected

2.5%compensa;on

n/a $4.3 $8.8 $13.3 $18.1

5.0%Insurance n/a $1.2 $2.5 $3.8 $5.2

CityofAurora,Colorado

The“Compensa;onIncrease”scenariocontains:

•  Asalaryincreaseof2.25percentforallemployeesin2016and2.5percentforeachyearthereaherthrough2020.•  Anincreaseofhealthbenefitsof5.0percentin2016followedby5.0percentincreasesinhealthanddentalbenefitsperyearfor2017-2020.

1.5Decisionphase

• ResponsiblePar;es•  Officials•  Staff•  Public

• Decisionsmadeonsuchitemsas•  Taxes/fees•  Servicelevels•  Fundbalance

16

17

TownofRiverBend,NorthCarolina

DuringtheFY2016budgetprepara;onprocess,thelong-rangeoutlookandprojecteddeficitswerethoroughlydiscussedbytheCouncil.Ifallprojec;onsholdtrue,wean;cipateasmalldeficitattheendofFY2016.Insubsequentyears,itisprojectedtoincrease.Currently,thosedeficitsareminimalandwillnothaveasubstan;alimpactonourcashbalance.Infact,asnotedearlier,cashbalanceisprojectedtoincreasethroughtheendofFY2019.

1.6Execute/monitorphase

•  Executestrategies•  Officials•  Staff

• Monitor•  Opera;onal(performancemeasures)•  Financial(budget)•  Timeintervalofmonitoring(dollarvalueandsignificanceofac-vity)

18

19

CityofPortland,Oregon

TheCityBudgetoffice(CBO)isreleasinganupdatetotheDecemberfive-yearfinancialforecastthatincorporatesnewinforma;ononinfla;on,businesslicenseandtransientlodgingrevenue,andaCouncildecisiontoallocatemoneytoaffordablehousingdevelopment.Thisupdatealsoincludesinforma;ononthegeneralfund’sperformanceinFY2015-2016aswellasthelatestlocaleconomicindicators.Largelyresul;ngfromahigherbusinesslicensetaxforecast,CBOnowprojectsthattheCitywillhave$4.4millioninexcessofongoingrevenueand$15.9millioninexcessofone-;merevenueintheFY2016-17budget.Boththeongoingandone-;mefiguresareupfromDecember,consistentwithwhatonewouldexpectgivencurrenteconomiccondi;ons.AfinalbudgetforecastwillbereleasedinlateApril.

1.7Communicate

• Web• Boardmee;ngs• Presenta;ons

• Whatlevelofdetail•  Throughtablesorgraphs

•  Roundtothousandsormillions

•  Includeprojec-ons,assump-ons,andconcisediscussion

20

21

St.JohnsCounty,Florida

22

CityofCoRonwood,Arizona

CONCLUSIONThisfive-yearanalysisoftheGeneralFunddemonstratesthatopera;ngrevenueswillnotkeepupwithopera;ngexpendituresforthenextfiveyears.ThisreflectstheCity’sinabilitytosubstan;allyincreasethecurrentrevenuestreamsviarateincreasesorthroughdiversifyingthecurrentrevenueswithaddi;onalfeesorchargesforservices.Thepresenteconomicsitua;onwillalsos;flefuturerevenuegenera;on.

Part2

• Crea;ngatrulyeffec;vecapitalbudge;ngprocess•  2.1 Defini-on•  2.2 Calendar•  2.3 Iden-fyneeds•  2.4 Capitalprojectrequests•  2.5 Priori-ze•  2.6 Determinecosts•  2.7 Developfinancingstrategies•  2.8 Capitalprojectdetailinthebudgetdocument•  2.9 Monitor/report 23

2.1DeGinition

•  Thedefini-onofacapitalprojectcanbedesignedinawaythatisbroadenoughtoencompassavarietyofdifferentsitua-ons

• Governmentsfrequentlyrefertoassetlife,assettype,anddollarthresholdinthisdefini;on

24

AssetCategory ConsideredaCapitalImprovementProject

AMaintenanceProjectorExpenditure

PublicFacili*es

•  Newfacilityconstruc;on. Majorreplacementorupgradingofthedesignofexis;ngmajorbuildingcomponents(roofreplacement,majorhea;ngsystemimprovements).

PublicFacili*es

•  Majorremodelingandstructuralalterna;onstoimprovespaceu;liza;onorincreasecapacity.

Preven;vemaintenancerepairsthatdonotsignificantlyupgradethestructureorincreaseitspreviouslyes;matedusefullife(forexampleminorroofpatchingorgu>errepairwork).

•  Programtomakeenergy-related

physicalimprovements.

•  Programtomakehandicapped-accessibilityphysicalimprovements.

25

Defini2onofCapitalExpenditures

IncorporatedCountyofLosAlamos,NewMexico

2.2Calendar

• Acalendarshowingkeydatesinthecapitalbudgetprocessshouldbepresented,alongwithtextdescribingtheprocess

• Responsiblepar-es(departments)andstatutorydeadlinesareusefulindescribingtheprocess

•  Thecapitalprocesscalendarcouldbeapartorjuxtaposedwiththeopera-ngbudgetcalendar

26

27

CityofTempe,Arizona

28

• Capitalassetsthatrequirerepair,maintenance,orreplacementthat,ifnotaddressed,willresultinhighercostsinfutureyears

•  Infrastructureimprovementsneededtosupportnewdevelopmentorredevelopment

• Projectswithrevenue-genera;ngpoten;al•  Improvementsthatsupporteconomicdevelopment•  Safety• Changesinpolicyorcommunityneeds

2.3Iden;fyneeds

29

RegionalMunicipalityofYork,Ontario

30

• Understandprojectscope

•  Clarifyprojectgoals•  Verifyalignmentwithstrategicneeds•  Clarifyintendedcustomer(s)

• Understandprojectcosts•  Develop/validateprojectrepor;ngformatandfrequency•  Validateprojectassump;onsbyprojectphase

•  Cost,includinglaborandmaterials•  Timeline•  Ongoingmaintenancecosts

• Whocanfillitout•  Projectoriginator

2.4Capitalprojectrequests

CityofSpringfield,Oregon

31

32

•  Informa-ononhowcapitalprojectsareevaluatedandpriori-zediscri-cal

• Considerastructuredprocessforpriori;zingneed•  Linktostrategicplan

•  Iden;fychangesinpriori;es•  Includestakeholdersintheprocess

•  Ci;zens•  Publicofficials•  Businesses•  Communitygroups•  Staff•  Otheragencies,includingregulatory

2.5Priori;ze

33

TownofWindsor,Colorado

Allimprovementsmustbypriori;zedandrankedbasedonthefollowingcategories:PriorityI:IMPERATIVE(Must-Do)–Projectsthatcannotreasonablybepostponedinordertoavoidharmfulorotherwiseundesirableconsequences.

A.Correctsacondi;ondangeroustopublichealthorsafetyB.Sa;sfiesalegalobliga;onC.Alleviatesanemergencyservicedisrup;onordeficiencyD.Preventsirreparabledamagetoavaluablepublicfacility.

PriorityII:ESSENTIAL(Should-Do)–Projectsthataddressclearlydemonstratedneedsorobjec2ves.

A.Rehabilitatesorreplacesanobsoletepublicfacilityora>achmenttheretoB.S;mulateseconomicgrowthandprivatecapitalinvestmentC.Reducesfutureopera;ngandmaintenancecostsD.Leveragesavailablestateorfederalfunding.

PriorityIII:IMPORTANT(Could-Do)–Projectsthatbenefitthecommunitybutmaybedelayedwithoutdetrimentaleffectstobasicservices.

A.ProvidesaneworexpandedlevelofserviceB.Promotesintergovernmentalcoopera;onC.Reducesenergyconsump;onD.Enhancesculturalornaturalresources.

PriorityIV:DESIRABLE(OtherYear)–Desirableprojectsthatarenotincludedwithinfive-yearprogrambecauseoffundinglimita2ons.

PRIORITIZINGCAPITALIMPROVEMENTS

2.6Determinecosts

34

•  Thescopeand;mingofaplannedprojectshouldbewelldefinedintheearlystagesoftheplanningprocess

•  Agenciesshouldiden;fyandusethemostappropriateapproaches,includingoutsideassistance,whenes;ma;ngprojectcostsandpoten;alrevenues

•  Forprojectsprogrammedbeyondthefirstyearoftheplan,governmentsshouldadjustcostprojec;onsbasedonan;cipatedinfla;on

•  Theongoingopera-ngcostsassociatedwitheachprojectshouldbequan-fied

•  Acleares;mateofallmajorcomponentsrequiredtoimplementaprojectshouldbeoutlined,includinglandacquisi;onneeds,design,construc;on,con;ngency,andpost-construc;oncosts

•  Thenon-financialimpactsoftheproject(e.g.,environmental)onthecommunityshouldberecognized

35

Thecostsoffutureopera;onsandmaintenancefornewCIPprojectsarees;matedbyeachdepartmentbasedonadetailedsetofcostguidelinesthatisprovidedtoalldepartmentseachyear.Theseguidelinesareupdatedannuallyinconjunc;onwiththevariousdepartmentsthatareexpertsondifferenttypesofopera;ngcosts.TheFY2016–2025CIPreflectsthefollowinges;matedopera;ngcostforcapitalprojects:•between$1.97and$2.80persq.h.annuallyforelectricalandgascostsinabuilding;•between$2.00and$3.00persq.h.annuallyforbuildingmaintenance,includinghea;ng,ven;la;ngandaircondi;oning(HVAC),plumbing,electrical,andstructuralrepairs;•$1.22persq.h.annuallyforcustodialservices;•$0.195persq.h.annuallyforbuildingwaterusage;•$341.26permonthforrefuse(two6-yardcontainerspickedupthree;mesaweek)

CityofGlendale,Arizona

2.7DevelopGinancingstrategies

36

• An;cipateexpectedrevenueandexpendituretrends,includingtheirrela;onshiptomul;-yearfinancialplans

• Preparecashflowprojec;onsoftheamountand;mingofthecapitalfinancing

•  Ensurecompliancewithallestablishedfinancialpolicies

• Recognizeappropriatelegalconstraints• Considerandes-matefundingamountsfromallappropriatefundingalterna-ves

•  Ensurereliabilityandstabilityofiden;fiedfundingsources

•  Evaluatetheaffordabilityofthefinancingstrategy,includingtheimpactondebtra-os,taxpayers,ratepayers,andothers

37

CityofWoodstock,Illinois

2.8Capitalprojectdetailinthebudgetdocument

38

• Notecapitalprojectsasrecurringornon-recurring•  Provideconciseprojectdetailwithjus-fica-onandbenefits

•  Projectcoststhroughthecompletecycle•  Timetablethatincludesthedifferentphasesandscheduledcomple;ondate

•  Picturestendtobemoreeffec-vethanmaps• Opera-ngimpacts•  Linktostrategicplan

Significant Non-Routine Capital Expenditures

Botanica Expansion

39

CouncilDistrict:AllType:NewConstruc;onCategory:ParkStart&CompleteDate:2012-2013Cost(total):$2,650,000Opera2onalCosts(addi2onal):$50,000Opera2onalStaff(addi2onal):MinimalBotanicacon2nuestoprovideapremiumaRrac2onontheriverthatsupportstheCoreAreaandNeighborhoodgoal.ThedevelopmentofthegardensandinfrastructurewillstrengthentheeconomicviabilityoftheBotanicaorganiza2onandsupporttheCityofWichitainprovidingculturalartsprogramsforci2zensandvisitors.ThefirstphaseoftheBotanicaExpansionProjectincludedthedevelopmentofachildren’sgardencomprisedofapproximatelyoneacrelocatedwestofthecurrentcomplex.Newinfrastructureforu2li2esandaroadlinkingNorthAmidontoSimParkDriveandMuseumBoulevardwereincluded.Addi2onalimprovementsincludemoremee2ngandclassroomspace.Addi2onalopera2ngcostsarees2matedat$50,000formaintenanceandu2li2es.

CityofWichita,Kansas

2.9Monitor/report

40

• Developrepor;ngrequirementsthroughpolicies•  Includewhetherprojectisonscheduleandwithinbudget•  Incorporateaprovisiononhowtohandlechangesandamendmentstotheplan

• Closeoutprojectswhencompleted

41

IllinoisStateTollHighwayAuthority

Part3

• Be>erassessingthepoten;alimpactofchangesinservicelevels•  3.1 Iden-fyservices•  3.2 Linktogoals/policies•  3.3 Summarize•  3.4 Reasonsforchange•  3.5 Servicestandards•  3.6 Equity(fairness)•  3.7 Financialsustainability•  3.8 Newrisks•  3.9 Customersa-sfac-on/qualityofservice 42

3.1Identifyservices

•  Purpose•  Categoriza-on

43

44

MecklenburgCounty,NorthCarolinaThefourquadrantsoftheChoicematrixare:NoChoices(Red)–ItemsinthiscategoryoffertheBoardnoop;onswhenitcomestoprovidingservicesortheamountoffunding.NoProgramChoice/FundingChoice(Blue)–ProgramslistedinthiscategoryareimposedontheBoard,yettheCountyhastheflexibilitywhenitcomestotheleveloffundingnecessarytomeettheprogramneeds.ProgramChoice/NoFundingChoice(Purple)–TheBoardhastheop;ontoprovidetheservicesinthiscategory.ProgramandFundingChoice(Green)–TheBoardhascompletecontroloverbothprogramandfundingdecisions.ThiscategoryofferstheBoardthegreatestdegreeofbudgetaryflexibility.TheChoicematrixisorganizedbyPrioritylevels,lis;ngeachservicewithineachmatrixquadrant.

45

MecklenburgCounty,NorthCarolina

$inmillions

$334

$801

$23

NoChoices(ServiceorFunding)

$412

NoServiceChoiceFundingChoice

$801

ServiceChoiceNoFundingChoice

$23

ServiceChoiceFundingChoice

$334

NoFundingChoice FundingChoice

NoServiceCh

oice

ServiceCh

oice

3.2Linktogoals/policies

•  Relatetostrategicplan•  Relatetolong-rangefinancialplans

•  Assignbudgetdollarstoservices•  Areyougebngwhatyoupaidfor

46

47

TownofHillsborough,California

TownGoals

RelatedBudgetItems

1.CommunityService POLICE–FundoneServiceClerkposi;onwhichwillresultinincreasedpatrol;mebyshihingadministra;vedu;es,suchasfleetmaintenance,transportofevidencetolabs,etc.fromtheofficers.NewroleasAlarmServiceTechnicianwillprovidesinglepointofcontacttoresidents/alarminstallerforsetupofnewalarmmonitoringaccounts($75K).POLICE–FundoneLieutenantposi;ontoprovidesinglepointofcontactforcommunityoutreach,tooverseetrainingprogram,tomanageanaly;csfromnewdispatchandrecordsmanagementsystem,andtoenhanceinves;ga;onscasemanagementinpartnershipwithcountywidecrimepreven;on.Inaddi;on,theposi;onwillimproveeffec;venessinsolvingcrimebyapplyingmoreresourcetointernalinves;ga;onsandcasereviewsandwillimprovetrainingprograms($170K).

LinkingGoalstoSignificant2015-2016BudgetItems

3.3Summarize

•  Chooseaformat•  Couldbeforeitherenhancementsorreduc-ons•  One--meorrecurring

•  Includedifferentfunds•  Don’tgettoodetailed

48

49

CityofMapleValley,Washington

3.4Reasonsforchange

•  Legisla;on•  Cost•  Revenue•  Demographics•  Changesindemand•  Poli;cs•  Servicequality

•  Safety•  Maintenance 50

51

CityofMapleValley,Washington

3.5Servicestandards

•  Parameters•  Ra-os•  Acceptablelevels

52

53

CityofLeawood,Kansas

3.6Equity(fairness)•  Makeservice-leveldecisionsinajustmanner•  Takethefollowingintoconsidera-on

•  Legisla-on•  Geography•  Ethnicity•  Accessibility•  Affordability

54

55

KingCountyDepartmentofTransporta2onMetroTransitDivision,Washington

Thetaskforcefeltthatitisimpera;veforanyfuturealloca;onofservicetoprovidetransitservicestothosewhohaveno,orlimited,transporta;onop;ons.TheydefinedSocialEquityandEnvironmentalJus;cetomeanusingtransitservicetoaddressgapsinmobility,andtoavoidormi;gatedispropor;onatelyhighandadversesocial,economic,orhumanhealthimpactsforpopula;onsthathavelimitedtransporta;onop;ons,includingyouth,students,elderly,disabled,peopleofcolor,thosewithlimitedEnglish.Inaddi;ontoconsideringtriporiginsforpeoplewithlimitedtransporta;onop;ons,considera;onshouldbegiventodes;na;onsforemployment,educa;on,healthcare,socialservices,andothercivicengagementac;vi;es.

3.7Financialsustainability•  Long-termfinancialplan

•  Compa;blewithfinancialstrategy•  Supportsfinancialsustainability

•  Rangeandlevelofservicesthatbestmeetservice-levelneedsandpreferences

•  Ifcurrentservicelevelsjeopardizeongoingfinancialsustainability•  Consideralterna;vestrategies

56

57

Morespecifictotheissueoftheagingpopula;onistheincreasednumberofelder-livingcommuni;esthatofferindependent,assisted,orfullcare.Thesecommuni;esvaluethepresenceoffire,rescue,andEMSandgenerateincreasedcalldemand.Forambulancetransport,thisisespeciallysignificantinboththedemandandthereimbursementrate.AmbulancetransportsforMedicarepa;entsarealmostalwaysreimbursedbutatamuchreducedrate.ThuswhiletheDistrictmayhaveincreasedgrossrevenues,roughlyhalfoftheincreasewillbeclassifiedasnon-allowed.ThisrestrictstheCFPD’sabilitytoincreasetheresponsecapacity.

CunninghamFireProtec2onDistrict,Colorado

3.8Newrisks•  Changeinserviceproviders•  Budgetaryconstraints

•  Choiceshavetobemade

•  Legisla-on•  Unfundedmandates

58

59

•  Weexpectthedemandforpublicsafetyandhumanservicestocon;nuetoincreasefor2015.WehaveincreasingcallsforEMSservice;growingcrimerates(whichbringsassociatedjailoralterna;vecorrec;onalneeds);increaseddemandformentalhealthservices(forallages);wai;nglistsforindividualswithdevelopmentaldisabili;es;andhelpingtokeeptheincreasingnumberofelderlyintheirhomesinsteadofcostlylong-termcare.

•  Noneoftheseareserviceswecancut.Formanyofthese,weareobligatedtoprovidemandatedservicesonbehalfofthestate,atacostof$150million,ofwhichSedgwickCountyonlyreceivesabout15%ofthefundingneededfromthestate.Thechoiceis—doweuselocalpropertytaxdollarstomeetthegapinservices,andifso,whatotherprogramsdoweeliminatetodothat?

SedgwickCounty,Kansas

3.9Customersatisfaction/qualityofservice

•  Whatlevelofserviceisacceptable•  Useoftechnology

•  Howtotrack/measure

60

61

Weareworkingtoenhanceourcommunica;onandoutreacheffortswithpatronsandresidents.Whilethiswillsupportourmarke;ngefforts,itisalsointendedtoprovidenewchannelsforpatronstocommunicatewiththedistrict.Keyitemsinthebudgetforthisthemeinclude:•  Fundingtodevelopamobileapptoprovideanother

toolforpatronstointeractandconductbusinesswiththedistrict

•  Fundingtodevelopnewreports,whicharenowbecomingafinancialmanagementbestprac;ce,forcommunica;ngbudgetandfinancialinforma;ontoresidentsinaconciseandeasilyunderstoodmanner

•  Con;nuedfundingforasystemthatallowsparkandfacilityuserstoprovidereal-;mefeedbackonthequalityofourfacili;esaswelltoprovideimmediateno;ceofproblems

Tuala2nHillsParkandRecrea2on,Oregon

Question1Inpresen;nginforma;onaboutlong-termplanning,governmentstendtobeweakestinregardtowhichofthefollowing?

A.  Showingtheprojec;onsB.  Describingtheassump;onsusedtomake

projec;onsC.  Discussingthesignificanceoftheprojec;ons

62

Question2Whichofthefollowingstatementsbestdescribesroundingforpurposesoflong-rangefinancialprojec;ons?A.  MostroundtothenextwholedollarB.  MostroundtothousandsofdollarsC.  Mostroundtothenextwholedollar,but

roundingtothousandsofdollarsisbe>erD.  Mostroundtothousandsofdollars,but

roundingtothenextwholedollarisbe>er63

Question3Governmentsareleastlikelytotakeintoaccountwhichofthefollowingwhenquan;fyingopera;ngimpacts?A.  CostsavingsB.  Addi;onalexpendituresC.  Addi;onalrevenue

64

Question4Mapsarethemosteffec;vewaytopresentprojectinforma;ononcapitalprojects:A.  TrueB.  False

65

Question5Whichofthefollowingwouldbeleastlikelytoaffectalong-termserviceleveldecision?

A.  UnfundedmandatesB.  DemographicchangesC.  WeatherD.  Poli;cs

66

Question6Whenpresen;ngexpenditureamounts,governmentstendtofocusleastonwhichofthefollowing?A.  SpendingbyexpenditurecomponentB.  SpendingbydepartmentC.  Spendingbygoal

67

Part4

• Makingbe>erdecisionsontheappropriatelevelsoffeesandcharges•  4.1 Considerapplicablelawsandstatutes•  4.2 Adoptformalpolicies•  4.3 Calculatethefullcostofprovidingaservice•  4.4 Reviewandupdate•  4.5 Benchmark•  4.6 U-lizelong-termforecas-ng•  4.7 Communicatetostakeholders•  4.8 Presentfeeinforma-on

68

4.1Considerapplicablelawsandstatutes

•  Lookatlawsandstatutesbeforeimplementa;on• Beawareofcurrentandproposedlegisla-on

69

TwoIllinoisStateSenateBillstoRestricttheAdministrativeFeesChargedbyCities

70

•SenateBill2261wouldlimittheadministra;vefeeforimpoundingvehiclesfromexceedingtheactualcostoftheserviceprovided.Italsopreventsanillegallyparkedcarfrombeingimpoundedunlessithasbeenabandonedformorethan48hours,andexemptscarslehbehindinanemergency.•SenateBill2265requiresthatdailystoragefeesforimpoundedvehiclescannotaccrueforatleastfivedaysaheracaristowed.Italsorequiresthatano;ceofseizuremustbesentbymail,andallowsaleaseholdertotakepossessionofanimpoundedvehicle.

Source:BellviewNews-DemocratApril14,2016

4.2Adoptformalpolicies

•  Iden;fythefactors(affordability,pricinghistory,infla;on,servicedeliveryalterna;ves,andavailableefficiencies)tobetakenintoaccountwhenpricinggoodsandservices

•  Statewhetherthejurisdic-onintendstorecoverthefullcostofprovidinggoodsandservices

• Outlinetheconsidera;onsthatmightinfluencegovernmentalpricingdecisions

71

72

Park&Recrea2onFeesA.  TheCitywilla>empttocoveratleast45percentofthetotalcostofrecrea;onprogrammingbychargingfeesforrecrea;onac;vi;esanduseofcityfacili;esandequipment.B.  TheCitywillestablishandmaintainthefollowingfeecategoriesandrelatedcostrecoverygoals:1.MaximumFeeSupport:Programfeesshouldfund80%ormoreofthecostforthefollowingprograms:specialinstruc;onclasses,compe;;veswimming,recrea;ontripsandou;ngs,adultsportleagues,majorspecialevents,latchkeyservices,andgolf.2.  Par;alFeeSupport:Programfeesshouldfund33%to80%ofthecostforthefollowingprograms:preschoolac;vi;es,introduc;ontosports(primarygrades),outdoorrecrea;on,specialcrahworkshops,andaqua;cs.3.MinimumFeeSupport:Programfeesshouldfundupto33%ofthecostforthefollowingprograms:communitycentersandac;vi;es,youthcentersandac;vi;es,minorspecialevents,playgroundac;vi;es,juniorathle;cs,non-sponsoredoutdoorrecrea;on,andco-sponsoredspecialinterestac;vi;es.

CityofAnkeny,Iowa

4.3Calculatethefullcostofprovidingaservice

• Calcula;ngthefullcostprovidesabasisforseDngthechargeorfee

•  Fullcostsincorporatedirectandindirectcosts• Costsofcollec;onneedtobeaddressed

73

74

CostofServicesAnalysisandFeeMethodologyCityofMinneapolis,Minnesota

Source:CityofMinneapolis2013Study

Followingthedetermina;onofdirectcost,a>en;onwasturnedtotheiden;fica;onandcalcula;onofindirectcostsassociatedwiththesupportofthedirectstaff.Forthisstudy,indirectcostsweredeemedtoinclude:

4.4Reviewandupdate

•  Lookatvariousfactors•  Impactofinfla;on•  Othercostincreases•  Adequacyofcostrecovery•  Useofservices•  Compe;;venessofcurrentrates

• Updatefeesonaperiodicbasis•  Helpstosmoothchargesandfees

75

76

•  Asapartofthebudgetprocess,theBoardsetwaterratesthatwillgointoeffectonJanuary1,2016.

•  Theplannedwaterrateadjustmentis2.5%basedonacostof

serviceanalysis.Thisrepresentsanimpactof$1/monthforthetypicalresiden;alcustomer.Themaincostdriversthatmakeanincreasein2016necessaryareinvestmentsininfrastructurereplacement,laborexpenses,securityenhancements,andagradualdeclineinindoorwateruse.

•  The2016rateisconsistentwithWaterOne’sapproachtoavoidratevola;litybycrea;ngincrementalrateadjustments.Stable,predictableratesarepreferredbycustomersandpromotethegrowthofthelocaleconomy.

WaterOne,Kansas

4.5Benchmark

• Benchmarkindividualfeesandchargeswiththosechargedbycomparableorneighboringjurisdic-ons

77

78

CityofBurnsville,Minnesota

4.6Utilizelong-termforecasting•  Servicefeeplanshouldbeconsistentwithlong-rangefinancialprojec-ons

• Recognizetheplanmaybeamendedtoreflectchangingcondi-onsinthefuture

79

KeepRatesandExpensesattheRateofInfla2on.•  TheBoardhasestablishedapriorityofmaintainingsewerrateaffordabilitybystrivingtokeeprategrowthtonomorethantheConsumerPriceIndex(CPI).Thishasbeenchallenging,astheDistrict’sopera;ngexpenses(wages,healthcare,re;rement,electricity,chemicals,etc.)tendtoincreasefasterthanCPI.

•  Forthepast9years,theDistricthasmaintainedthegoalofnotincreasingratesbeyondinfla;onbyinves;ngincapitalprojectsandprocessesthatreduceopera;ngexpenses.

•  Thecalcula;onofsewerservicechargesratesbasedonassetlifecyclecosts(intheTen-YearFinancialForecastsec;onofthebudgetdocument)highlightsthat,evenwiththecostsavingmeasuresimplementedbytheDistrict,thesewerservicechargesarenotadequatetomeettherenewalandreplacementneedsoftheDistrict.

80

NAPASanita2onDistrict,California

4.7Communicatetostakeholders• Provideinforma-ononchargesandfeestothepublic• Giveci;zensfeedbackopportunity

81

82

CityofDaytonaBeach,Florida

•  Thenewproposalaimstocreateconsistencyandclarityinfeesacrosscityvenues.Thechangesincludesugges;onstoassessnon-cityresidentsrentalfeesthatare25percenthigher,removefeesthatkeepfamiliesfromusingopenspaceforfreeplayatsomeparksandcommunitycenters,establishconsistentfeesforallathle;cdailyrentalsforprac;ceandgamesandlowerthebaserentalfeeoffacili;esbutaddsurchargesbasedontheimpactandrequirementsofplannedevents.

Source:h>p://www.news-journalonline.com

4.8PresentFeeInformation•  Explainwhy•  Showdollarimpact

• Neworexis-ng• Adjustforconsump;on• Donotlisteveryfeeinbudgetdocument

83

84

PinellasCounty,Florida

Part5•  Designingmoreeffec;vemeasuresofperformance(TheNa;onalPerformanceManagementCommission)•  5.1 Informa-on,measures,goals,andac-vi-esshould

berelevanttothepriori-esandwell-beingofthegovernmentandthecommunity

•  5.2 Informa-onrelatedtoperformance,decisions,regula-ons,andprocessesshouldbetransparent,easytoaccess,use,andunderstand

•  5.3 Goals,programs,ac-vi-es,andresourcesshouldbealignedwithpriori-esanddesiredresults

•  5.4 Decisionsandprocessesshouldbedrivenby-mely,accurate,andmeaningfuldata

•  5.5 Performancemanagementshouldhelptotransformtheorganiza-on,management,andthepolicy-makingprocess

•  5.6 Prac-cesshouldbesustainableover-meandacrossorganiza-onalchanges

85

TheNationalPerformanceManagementCommission

•  Representedelevenna;onalpublicinterestorganiza;onsofelectedandappointedstateandlocalgovernmentofficials(includingGFOA)

•  Issuedareportin2010,APerformanceManagementFrameworkforStateandLocalGovernment:FromMeasurementandRepor-ngtoManagementandImproving

•  Sixmajorprincipleswereaddressed

86

5.1Information,measures,goals,priorities,andactivitiesarerelevanttotheprioritiesandwell-beingofthegovernmentandthecommunity• Usecommunitycondi;onmeasurestoassessresidentneedsthatmaynotbeaddressedbycurrentprograms

• Usecustomerorresidentsa-sfac-onsurveys•  Avoidprin-ngoutthefullsurveyandalloftheresults•  Summarizefindings

87

88

CityofBeRendorf,Iowa

5.2Informationrelatedtoperformance,decisions,regulations,andprocessesistransparent,easytoaccess,use,andunderstand

•  Limitthenumberanddegreeofperformancemeasuresthatprovideanefficientandmeaningfulwaytoassesstheeffec-venessandefficiencyofkeyprograms

• Reportinternallyandexternally

89

90

CityofWilliamsburg,Virginia

5.3Goals,programs,activities,andresourcesarealignedwithprioritiesanddesiredresults

•  Ensurethatthebenefitsofestablishingandusingperformancemeasuresexceedtheresourcesrequiredtoestablishperformancemeasures

• Baseonperformancemeasuresthat-etoastatementofprogrammissionorpurpose

• Measureprogramoutcomes

91

92

CityofTemecula,California

CoreValue

Five-YearLong-TermGoal

PerformanceMeasures

FY2013-14Actuals

FY2014-15Actuals

FY2015-16Target

ASafeand

Prepa

red

Commun

ity

MinimizeTheImpactToLife,

Property,andTheEnvironmentFromNaturalHazards

AndEmergencySitua;ons

PercentageofCSO’s

trainedintheopera;onandsetup

oftheMobileCommandPost

60%

75%

80%

RemainWithinTheFederalRankingOfTheTop25Safest

Ci;es

Percentageofpatrolofficersmaintaining24-hourperishable

skillstraining

95%

100%

100%

PoliceDivision/ProgramPatrolServicesPERFORMANCEMEASURESFORFISCALYEAR2015-2016

5.4Decisionsandprocessesaredrivenbytimely,accurate,andmeaningfuldata

• Beverifiable,understandable,and;mely• Bemonitoredandusedinmanagerialdecision-makingprocesses

• Adoptcommondefini-onsofkeyefficiencyandeffec-venessperformancemeasurestoallowintergovernmentalcomparisons

93

94

CityofMapleValley,Washington

5.5 Performancemanagementhelpstotransformtheorganization,itsmanagement,andthepolicy-makingprocess

•  Provideforresourcealloca;oncomparisonsover;me• Measureefficiencyandeffec-venessforcon-nuousimprovement

•  Beconsistentthroughoutthestrategicplan,budget,accoun;ngandrepor;ngsystemstotheextentprac;cal

•  Developandperiodicallyreviewsupportabletargetsforeachperformancemeasure

•  Developmul-yearseriesofqualityoroutcomeindicatorstomeasuretheeffec-venessandefficiencyofservicedeliverywithinprograms

95

96

CityofGrantsPass,Oregon

5.6Practicesaresustainableovertimeandacrossorganizationalchanges

• Designtheprac-cesinsuchawaytomo-vatestaffatalllevelstocontributetowardorganiza-onalimprovement

•  Evaluatethedatatouseinlong-termresourcealloca;onandbudgetdecisionsforcon;nuousimprovement

• Developcommonorimprovedapproachestotheu-liza-onoffinancialandnon-financialperformancemeasuresinmakingandevalua-ngdecisions

97

98

TownofChapelHill,NorthCarolina

99

Source:Na2onalLeagueofCi2es2014

Part6

•  Improvingtheprocessofbudge;ngforsalariesandwages•  6.1 Personneltrackingsystem•  6.2 Vacancyadjustments•  6.3 Fundedversusunfundedposi-ons•  6.4 Frozenoreliminatedposi-ons•  6.5 Compensa-onapproaches•  6.6 Op-malstaffinglevel

100

6.1Personneltrackingsystem

• Budgetpayrollprojec;onsarebasedonthees;mateofbudgetedposi;onsfortheyear•  Providingthecorrectnumberofbudgetedposi-onsisimportant

•  Thesystemtotrackbudgetedposi;onsmayresideinthehumanresourcesdepartmentratherthanthebudgetdepartment

•  Itisvitalthatthedepartmentsworktogethertobeconsistentinrepor;ng

•  Thesystemshouldbeabletotrackalltypesofemployees,notjustfull-;me 101

102

TheCity’sCentralOrganiza;onandPosi;onManagementSystemmaintainsacompleteinventoryoftheCity’sposi;ons,theira>ributes,andrepor;nghierarchies.AnaccurateandconsistentOrganiza;onandPosi;onManagementsystemiscri;calinavoidingbudgetaryover-expenditureandisessen;alinprovidingdecision-makinginforma;oninsupportoftheCity’sHumanResources,andfinancialplanning,andmanagement.

CityofPortland,Oregon

6.2Vacancyadjustments

•  Startdates•  Trends

•  Itmaybeprudenttoincludeahiringlaginthebudget,sincemostgovernmentsexperiencesomevacanciesduringtheyear•  Todeterminethedollarimpactofthislagistoreviewtrends(averagefilledposi-onsperyearversusaveragevacantposi-ons)

•  Analysiscanbeconductedatthedepartmentlevelorbrokenoutbyindividualposi;on

•  Technicalorhigherlevelposi;onsareusuallyhardertofill 103

104

CityofRye,NewYork

6.3Fundedversusunfundedpositions

• Approvedposi-onsshouldbefundedinthebudget

• Unfundedposi;ons,orthosethatwererequestedbutnotapproved,shouldbenoted,especiallyifmanagementdecidesatsomepointtoreconsidersomeofthosedeniedposi;onrequests

105

106

WhioieldCounty,Georgia

6.4Frozenoreliminatedpositions

•  Someposi;onsmaybefrozen• Otherposi;onsmaybetemporarilyfrozen•  Thedollarssavedbynotfillingtheseposi-onsshouldbequan-fied

•  Iftheposi;onsbeingeliminatedarecurrentlyfilled,thenthegovernmentmightalsoneedtoincludeseverancepayoutsinthebudget

107

108

WhioieldCounty,Georgia

6.5Compensationapproaches•  Stepandgradesystems

•  Salaryrange• Payforperformance

•  Fosterworkplaceproduc;vity•  Needtodesignausefulappraisalsystem

• Wagesurveys• Cost-of-livingadjustmentsohenareusedwhenforecas-ngpersonnelcosts

•  TheConsumerPriceIndex(CPI),abroadmeasureofconsumerinfla-on,isthecost-of-livingindexusedmostohenfordeterminingsalaryincreases 109

110

CollierCounty,Florida

6.6OptimalstafGinglevel

• Comparisontoothergovernments•  Usepopula-ontoemployeera-os

•  Staffingguidelines•  Setupspecificpolicies

• Posi;onsclassifiedbygoal• Useofvolunteers•  Seasonalandtemporaryposi;ons• Otherconsidera;ons

•  Over;meratherthanhiringfull-;me•  Useofre;redemployees

111

112

CityofTempe,Arizona

113

CityofLiRleton,Colorado

Communica;ons&Marke;ng 40CommunityDevelopment 360Police17,073PublicWorks24Library3,032Museum8,344Total 28,873

Es;matedVolunteerHours-2014

Question7Thereisnoprac;calreasontocalculatethefullcostofasubsidizedac;vity.

A.  TrueB.  False

114

Question8Whatfeesshouldbelistedinthebudgetdocument?A.  ThosewithahighdollarimpactB.  Thosesubjecttoahighlevelofci;zenconcernC.  ThoseaffectedbysignificantchangesD.  AlloftheaboveE.  Alistofallfeesshouldbepresented

115

Question9Whichofthefollowingstatementistrueregardingperformancemeasurement(PM)?A.  PMshouldfocusonactualpastperformanceB.  PMshouldfocusonfutureperformanceC.  PMshouldfocusonbothactualpast

performanceandfutureperformance

116

Question10Whichofthefollowingstatementsisfalse?A.  Tobeeffec;ve,performancemeasuresmust

belinkedtogoalsB.  Objec;vityrequiresthatperformance

measuresfocusprimarilyonac;vitylevels(measuresofoutput)

C.  Performancemeasuresmayincludecomparisonstoselectedbenchmarks

D.  Performancemeasuresmayincludecomparisonswithpeergovernments

117

Question11Whichofthefollowingstatementsismoreaccurateregardingsalaryforecasts?

A.  Assumingfull-;meemploymenttendstoresultintheleastvariance

B.  Usingahiringlagfactortendstoresultintheleastvariance

118

Question12Whichofthefollowingcompensa;onapproachesshouldbeavoided?

A.  StepandgradesystemsB.  PayforperformanceC.  UseofwagesurveysD.  Noneoftheabove

119

Markyourcalendar

•  2017GFOAAnnualBe>erBudge;ng•  Thursday,October5,2017

120

Biography John D. Fishbein is a Senior Program Manager in Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) Technical Services Center. Mr. Fishbein came to GFOA in 2002. He is responsible for the day-to-day operation of GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program. He is the author of GFOA’s recent publication, Building a Better Budget Document. He previously authored Preparing High Quality Budget Documents for School Districts and Preparing High Quality Budget Documents. He serves as staff to GFOA’s standing Committee on Governmental Budgeting and Fiscal Policy. John can be reached by phone at 312-578-2268 or by e-mail at jfishbein@gfoa.org.

121

Biography

Mike Bailey has worked in local government finance since 1980 and is currently the Finance Director with the City of Redmond. He has served as president of the Washington Finance Officers Association and the state representative for the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). Mike was on GFOA’s Executive Board. He has served as Chairman of GFOA Technology Resource Group and as a member and Vice Chair of GFOA’s Budget and Management Committee. He is a CPA and has been a GFOA budget reviewer for almost two decades. Mike can be reached by phone at 425-556-2160 or by e-mail at mebailey@redmond.gov.

122