Post on 15-Dec-2015
transcript
1
Physical Processes in
Solar and Stellar Flares
Eric Hilton
General Exam
March 17th, 2008
2
Outline
• Overview and Flare Observations
• Physical Processes on the Sun– Standard Two-ribbon Model – Magnetic Reconnection– Particle Acceleration
• Stellar Comparison
• Summary
3
The Sun
Magnetic loopsTRACE image
Footprints
~ 109 cm
5
Flare basics
• Flares are the sudden release of energy, leading to increased emission in most wavelength regimes lasting for minutes to hours.
6
Light curves
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Kane et al., 1985
Time
White light
Radio
X-rays
7
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moving Footprints
8
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moore et. al, 2001
Sigmoid model
9
Data of Sigmoid
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moore et. al, 2001
RHESSI data
attribute
10
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
11
12
Where does the energy come from?
A typical Solar flare emits about 1032 ergs total.
The typical size is
L ~ 3x109 cm, H ~ 2x109 cm, leading to V ~ 2x1028 cm3
Thermal energy?
In the chromosphere, the column density, col is ~0.01 g/cm2 and T~ 1x104 K.
In the corona, it’s 3x10-6 g/cm2, 3x106 K
Eth ≈ 3 colkTL2/mH ≈ 2x1029 ergs for chromosphere
≈ 2x1028 ergs for corona.
Not cutting it.
13
Nuclear power?
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The corona doesn’t have the temperature or density, unless…
14
No, magnetic energy
EB = VB2/(2o) so , for B = 300-1000 G, you’re at 1x1032-33 erg.
Now, how is the energy released quickly enough?
t ~ L2 o ~ 5x1011 seconds for diffusion, way too long
So, do it quickly in a current sheet
15
Outline
• Overview and Flare Observations
• Physical Processes on the Sun– Standard Two-ribbon Model– Magnetic Reconnection– Particle Acceleration
• Stellar Comparison
• Summary
16
“Magnetic event”(reconnection)
Two-Ribbon Flare Model
Martins & Kuin, 1990
17
Flow and impaction of
current sheet
Two-Ribbon Flare Model
Gyrosynchrotron radio emission
Brehmsstrahlung hard X-ray& optical emission
Martins & Kuin, 1990
18
Chromospheric
evaporation &
condensation
Two-Ribbon Flare Model
Blue-shifted UV (≈100s km/s)
Red-shifted optical (≈10s km/s)
Gyrosynchrotron radio emission
Martins & Kuin, 1990
19
Two-Ribbon Flare ModelSoft X-ray
Optical
Corona become optically
thick
Martins & Kuin, 1990
20
Post flare emission(quiescent)
Two-Ribbon Flare Model
Gyrosynchrotron radio emission
Optical
Martins & Kuin, 1990
21
This model explains…
• the relationship to CMEs
• the Neupert effect
• Sunquakes
• Radio observations
22
Outline
• Overview and Flare Observations
• Physical Processes on the Sun– Standard Two-ribbon Model– Magnetic Reconnection– Particle Acceleration
• Stellar Comparison
• Summary
23
Magnetic Reconnection
Sweet-Parker
(1958,1957)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
B-field lines
vinflow
• Material flows in
• v x B gives current into the page
• called a ‘current sheet’ or ‘neutral sheet’
•current dissipation heats the plasma
24
Magnetic Reconnection
Sweet-Parker
(1958,1957)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
B-field lines
vinflow
vout
Pressure is higher in the reconnection region, so flows out the ends
25
Petschek mechanism
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Priest & Forbes, 2002
26
Reconnection Inflow
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Narukage & Shibata, 2006
27
Outline
• Overview and Flare Observations
• Physical Processes on the Sun– Standard Two-ribbon Model– Magnetic Reconnection– Particle Acceleration
• Stellar Comparison
• Summary
28
Particle acceleration
1. DC from E-fields ~ 103 Vm-1 during reconnection
2. MHD shocks - accelerate more particles more slowly - can explain the main phase
3. Highly turbulent environment may give rise to stochastic acceleration - ie fast-mode Alfven-waves.
29
Ion beam• 2.223 MeV is a neutron capture line - ions collide with atmosphere, producing fast neutrons.
• These neutrons thermalize for ~100 sec before being captured by Hydrogen.
• Hydrogen is turned into Deuterium, releasing a -ray
• Time profiles (with 100 sec delay) suggest beams happen at same time.
30
Displaced ion and electron beams
Hurford et al.,20062003, Oct 28th flare
4th with measured gamma rays - all showing displacement between - and hard X-rays. This is first to show both footprints
31
Ion and electron beam displacement•Possible displacement caused by drift of electrons and ions with different sign of charge. This effect is 2 orders of magnitude too small.
• Currently, it’s not known why there is displacement.
32
Gamma-ray movie
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Soft X-Rays Hard X-Rays Gamma Rays
33
New model for particle acceleration
Fletcher & Hudson, 2008 (RHESSI Nugget #68, Feb 4th, 2008)
34
Outline
• Overview and Flare Observations
• Physical Processes on the Sun– Standard Two-ribbon Model– Magnetic Reconnection– Particle Acceleration
• Stellar Comparison
• Summary
35
Stellar comparison
• When we look at a star, we lose all spatial resolution, lots of photons, and continuous monitoring.
• We can’t observe hard X-rays, and only observe limited soft X-rays
• We gain new regimes of temperature, magnetic field generation and configuration, plasma density, etc.
• We can adopt the Solar analogy, but is it valid? What observations can we make?
36
Osten et al., 2005
Stellar Flares
37
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Big stellar flares
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Hawley & Pettersen, 1991
38
Flare - quietData courtesy of Marcel Agüeros
39
X-ray/microwave ratio
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Benz & Gudel, 1994
40
The Sun is not a Flare Star!
• Although some parts of the analogy clearly hold, we would not see flares on the Sun if it were further away.
• Are the flares we see fundamentally different?
• We are biased to detecting only the largest flares, so must be cautious about extrapolating to rates of smaller flares.
41
Solar vs. StellarAschwanden, 2007
42
Mullan et al.,2006
Magnetic loop lengths
V-I
L/R
43
EUVE Flare rates
Audard et al., 2000
44
My Thesis
• I will make hundreds of hours of new observations of M dwarfs to determine flare rates
• I am creating model galaxy simulations to predict flare rates on a Galactic scale that includes spectral type and activity level. We can ‘observe’ this model to predict what LSST will see.
45
Summary of Solar Flares
• Magnetic loops become entangled by motions of the footprints, storing magnetic energy
• This energy is released through rapid magnetic reconnection that accelerates particles.
• Flares emit in all wavelength regimes.• The general theory is well-established, but
the details continue to be very complex.
46
The Sun, in closing
“Coronal dynamics remains an active research area. Details of the eruption process including how magnetic energy is stored, how eruptions onset, and how the stored energy is converted to other forms are still open questions.”
- Cassak, Mullan, & Shaypublished March 3rd, 2008
47
Summary of Stellar Flares
• Many aspects of the Solar model seem to be true on stars as well.
• Observations have revealed inconsistencies that have not yet been resolved.
• Flares are the coolest!
48
Thanks
• Thanks to my committee, esp. Mihalis for coming all the way from Ireland on St. Patrick’s Day.
• Thanks to my fellow grad students for feedback on my practice talk.
49
The End
50
Radio Flares Osten et al.,2005
51
X-ray flares
52
Stats of RHESSI flares
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Su, Gan, & Li, 2006
53
Stats con’t
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Su, Gan, & Li, 2006
54
Stats con’td
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Su, Gan, & Li, 2006
55
Stats con’td
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Su, Gan, & Li, 2006
56
Statistical motivation for Avalanche
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Charbonneau et al., 2001
57
Downward motion of centroid
Sui, Homan, & Dennis, 2004
6-12keV *0.5
25-50keV
58
Disproving nano-flare heating
Aschwanden, 2008
59
Reconnection & X-ray flux
Jing et al., 2005
60
Correlations
Jing et al., 2005
61
CMEs
Jing et al., 2005
62
Neupert Effect
Veronig et al., 2005
63
Gamma-ray spectroscopy
Smith et al., 2003
64
Movie-time
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
65
66
Loop lengths in active stars
Mullan et al.,2006
67
Avalanche
Such models, although a priori far removed from the physics of magnetic reconnection and magnetohydrodynamical evolution of coronal structures, nonetheless reproduce quite well the observed statistical distribution of flare characteristics. - Belanger, Vincent, & Charbonneau, 2007
68
The model
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
69
Model results
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Charbonneau et al., 2001
70
Model results
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Charbonneau et al., 2001
71
SOC-Cascades of Loops
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Hughes, et al.,2003
72
Cassak et. al, 2008
73
Peak values during the flares
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Benz & Gudel, 1994
74
Sunquakes
QuickTime™ and aCinepak decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
75
More complicated reconnection
• Petschek is just a special case of almost-uniform reconnection
• There are also non-uniform models with separatrix jets.
• In some cases, the sheet tears, and enters the regime of impulsive bursty reconnection
• The 3D models are very complicated 3D MHD.
76
More sigmoid
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moore et. al, 2001
77
Types of Magnetic Emission
Flaring: strong, impulsive emission that decays rapidly (minutes to hours), both line and continuum flux may be detected (L ≈ 10-3 - 102 Lbol)
Quiescent: steady emission that persists over long periods, typically line flux only in optical (L ≈ 10-6 - 10-3 Lbol)
Liebert et al. (1999)
78
Twisted field lines
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Priest & Forbes, 2002
79
Solar to stellar - scaling laws
Aschwanden, 2007
80
Veronig et al., 2005