Post on 31-Mar-2015
transcript
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
Overseas
Visitors
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
US Visitors
USVisito
rs
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
British Visitors
British
Visitors
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
All European Visitors
Other European
Visitors
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
French Visitors
FrenchVisitor
s
2002-2012All Ratings: value for money
German Visitors
German
Visitors
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
20
-3-6 -7 -6
8
-5
-11
0
13
24
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
Overseas
Visitors
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
27
-13
-30
-19-15
-10
-23
-8
12
2328
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
US Visitors
USVisito
rs
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
36
11 96 5
22
4
-16
-7
2
15
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
British Visitors
British
Visitors
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-14
-25-20 -22
-17
-2-8
-3
4
2129
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
All European Visitors
Other European
Visitors
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
-13 -12 -14 -12 -11-18
-9
8
27
42
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
French Visitors
FrenchVisitor
s
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-25-30 -30 -32 -34
-15
-29 -30
-16
6 5
*(net result when ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’ score are subtracted from ‘good’ or very good’ scores)
2002-2012Net rating of value for money*
German Visitors
German
Visitors