Post on 02-Feb-2018
transcript
2009 Irish Civil ServiceCustomer Satisfaction Survey
Prepared by Ipsos MORI on behalf of the
Transforming Public Services Programme OfficeDepartment of the Taoiseach
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
Contents
1. Introduction..................................................................................41.1 Measuring Public Sector Customer Satisfaction....................................4
1.2 Structure of Report.................................................................................5
2. Research Methodology...............................................................62.1 Overview of Research Methodology......................................................6
2.2 Questionnaire Development...................................................................6
2.3 Survey Administration............................................................................7
2.3.1 Stand-Alone Survey............................................................................7
2.4 Sampling Method/Size...........................................................................8
2.5 Project Management Standards............................................................9
3. Civil Service Contact ................................................................103.1 Civil Service Department or Office Contact.........................................10
3.2 Most Recent Contact............................................................................11
3.3 Nature of Most Recent Contact............................................................12
3.4 Method of Contact – Any Contact........................................................13
3.4.1 Method of Contact – Most Recent....................................................14
4. Satisfaction with Customer Service........................................164.1 Overall Satisfaction with Service..........................................................16
4.2 Satisfaction with Service Delivery Methods.........................................18
4.2.1 Satisfaction with Service by Phone...................................................18
4.2.2 Satisfaction with Service in Person...................................................20
4.2.3 Satisfaction with Service in Writing...................................................22
4.2.4 Satisfaction with Service by E-mail...................................................23
4.2.5 Satisfaction with Service via Internet................................................24
4.3 Dissatisfaction with Service or Contact ...............................................25
4.3.1 Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Service or Contact .......................26
5. Perceptions of the Civil Service...............................................285.1 Civil Service Advocacy.........................................................................28
5.2 Perceptions of Civil Service Efficiency.................................................30
2
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.3 Familiarity with the Civil Service..........................................................31
5.4 Favourability with the Civil Service......................................................32
5.4.1 Trends in Favourability & Familiarity.................................................33
5.5 Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation............................34
5.5.1 Positive Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation...........34
5.5.2 Negative Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation.........35
5.5.3 Changes in Public Perceptions of the Civil Service as an
Organisation – Declining Trust?.................................................................36
5.5.4 Declining Levels of Trust – External Data.........................................38
6. Access to Services....................................................................406.1 Convenience of Contact Methods........................................................40
6.2 Language Services..............................................................................41
6.2.1 Irish Language Services....................................................................41
6.2.2 Satisfaction with Access to Services (other languages)...................42
7. Understanding Customer Contact...........................................437.1 The Nature of Customer Contact.........................................................43
7.2 Measuring Performance.......................................................................47
Report prepared by:
Tarik Laher
Director, Ipsos MORI
Emmet Ó Briain
Research Development Director, Ipsos MORI
Sarah Nitting-Fulin
Research Executive, Ipsos MORI
3
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
1. IntroductionIpsos MORI was commissioned in August 2009 by the Transforming Public Services
(TPS) Programme Office, based in the Department of the Taoiseach, to conduct a
survey of members of the general public to determine levels of customer satisfaction
with services provided by Civil Service Departments and Offices, and attitudes to the
Civil Service among the general public.
The survey provides a comparison with previous surveys conducted in 2008, 2005 and
2002 and demonstrates the Civil Service’s commitment to improving the quality of
service delivery to its customers.
Once again, the survey considers the views of all citizens, rather than simply
customers of individual Departments or users of specific services. While the analysis of
customer experience is restricted to those who had contact with the Civil Service in the
last 12 months, the measurements of attitudes to the Civil Service is not. All members
of the general public, including those who have not had direct contact in the last 12
months, are stakeholders of the Civil Service. Even those without contact may have
perceptions of its performance in terms of customer service and this provides valuable
context to the interpretation of customer attitudes to service delivery.
1.1 Measuring Public Sector Customer Satisfaction
There are a number of features of customer satisfaction in a public sector context that
distinguish it from private sector customer satisfaction research. The challenge for the
Civil Service is to balance distinct, and often competing, factors relating to value for
money for citizens with high quality, accessible services for customers.
Firstly, customer surveys are exclusively concerned with clients’ satisfaction with the
delivery of services at an operational level. However, citizen surveys could consider
issues such as whether certain services should be provided by the public sector at all.
Secondly, for customers and users, their priorities are for a better service, even though,
as citizens, they may also recognise that resources may be better used elsewhere.
There are also a number of features of public services that make them different from
private sector services, and which reduce the usefulness of direct comparison between
the public and private sectors.
Many commercial models of service quality focus on the aim of increasing consumption
4
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
of services and increasing customer loyalty whereas, for certain public services, these
considerations are in theory less relevant, as customers may be obliged to consume
the services (such as regulatory services) or where a reduction in consumption would
be preferred (e.g. health and social welfare).
An important consideration in evaluating customer satisfaction in the Civil Service is
that the range of impacts on the image of public services is likely to be wider than for
private services. In particular, expectations of public services are not only influenced by
direct communications from the service, or even what the media says about the
service, but also the reputation of the Government and politicians generally. While it is
generally agreed that the impact of these factors will be relatively minor when asking
about very specific service elements, it can have an impact on aggregate ratings and
on public perceptions of the Civil Service as a whole.
1.2 Structure of Report
The report begins with a discussion of the methodology employed for the survey before
turning to a description of the results. The report concludes with a review of the main
findings of the research and recommendations arising from the research.
Throughout the report, results are presented firstly at an overall aggregate level before
highlighting significant differences between particular subgroups. Generally, results of
individual subgroups are not reported where no significant differences exist between
the attitudes, opinions or other results of groups. Results of individual subgroups are
also not reported where subgroup sample sizes are insufficiently large to permit reliable
inferences to be drawn.
Results of other studies are also included in Section 5.4.4 to provide context for
declining levels of trust that are evident in Ireland at present.
5
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
2. Research Methodology
2.1 Overview of Research Methodology
This section sets out details of the methodology employed and interviewing approach
used by Ipsos MORI during the Irish Civil Service Customer Satisfaction Survey. The
research reported in this document was undertaken by Ipsos MORI, an independent
research company based in Dublin. The nature and importance of the research project
demanded robust statistical information as an output, so that the attitudes and
perceptions of customers and their experiences of interaction with Government
Departments and Offices could be measured reliably. Thus, the agreed methodology
was a quantitative survey conducted face-to-face with a nationally representative
sample of the general public.
2.2 Questionnaire Development
At the outset of the project, Ipsos MORI and the project steering team met to agree the
principal objectives of the research and to prioritise question areas for inclusion in the
research. It was agreed that question areas from previous surveys remained relevant
and should be retained so that progress could be reliably measured. These included:
contact with Civil Service Departments and Offices, frequency and nature of contact,
satisfaction with customer experience, satisfaction with specific contact methods,
convenience of contact methods, general perceptions of the Civil Service as an
organisation, customer advocacy of the Civil Service, as well as reasons for customer
dissatisfaction and recommendations for future improvements in service delivery.
6
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
2.3 Survey Administration
The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI using face-to-face interviewing. All
interviews were conducted by trained Ipsos MORI field interviewers, who are all
accredited by the Interviewer Quality Control Scheme (IQCS), an independent
organisation which works with researchers and research clients to ensure the highest
standards of data collection in professional research.
The method of administration employed - face-to-face personal interviewing - has
obvious advantages over alternative approaches, such as telephone and self-
completion, as it allows for greater probing of the respondents’ responses to get more
detailed and accurate answers.
2.3.1 Stand-Alone Survey
When conducted in 2002 and 1997, the Civil Service customer survey was conducted
as part of a syndicated omnibus survey, whereby a representative sample of the
general population are surveyed on a variety of topics for a variety of clients to provide
cost-efficiencies to those placing questions on the survey. However, in 2005,
recognising the importance of the study, a stand-alone survey was preferred as a more
reliable and appropriate approach. On an omnibus survey, questions could be included
(i) at any position in the survey, whereby the quality of responses to questions towards
the end of a longer survey can suffer due to respondent fatigue, and (ii) alongside other
unrelated areas such as product purchase behaviour that may distract the respondent.
This stand-alone approach has subsequently been retained for the 2008 and 2009
surveys.
7
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
2.4 Sampling Method/Size
Interviews were conducted during September and October 2009, at 100 different
sampling points in the Republic of Ireland.
A total of 2,007 interviews were completed with adults aged 18 and older. A sample of
this size provides robust data at an aggregate level and for certain sub-group analyses
(e.g. most recent contact, age, socio-economic group, etc). The table below illustrates
the representative nature of a sample of different sizes. For example, if the results of a
survey of 2,000 people show that 70% of the public have a favourable opinion of the
Civil Service, the range which the true figure would lie, if all the population had been
interviewed would be +/- 2 points (i.e. somewhere between 68% and 72%), 95 times
out of 100. In fact, the “true” figure is more likely to lie at the mid-point of the range,
rather than at either extreme.
Sampling tolerances applicable to results ator near these percentages (based on 95% confidence level)
Sample Size 10/90% 30/70% 50%+% +% +%
1,000 2 3 31,200 2 3 32,000 1 2 2
The same quotas as last year were applied to ensure that the sample was
representative of the population and that data was comparable. The applied quotas
were as follow:
• 2 gender quotas (male, female),
• 4 age bands (18-24, 25-39, 40-55, 55+),
• 4 region quotas (Dublin, Rest of Leinster, Munster and Connaught / Ulster),
• 2 Socio-Economic Group quotas (ABC1, C2DE).
8
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
2.5 Project Management Standards
ISO 20252:2006
All aspects of this survey were conducted in accordance with the ISO 20252:2006
quality standard, the first quality management systems standard laid down by the
internationally recognised International Standards Organisation to be dedicated solely
to market, opinion and social research. It supersedes the ISO 9001:2000 standard that
we previously held, and provides absolute assurance of quality throughout the
business. Ipsos MORI is the first market research company in Ireland to hold this
standard.
MRS Code of Conduct
As members of the Market Research Society, we adhere to a strict code of conduct
that encompasses not only quality standards, but also ethical and legislative principles.
This helps to provide confidence in our findings for our clients, our respondents, and
our own industry.
9
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
3. Civil Service Contact This first chapter of results examines the level and nature of contact members of the
public had with the Civil Service in the 12 months preceding the survey. These results
detail which Departments or Offices were contacted by customers, how frequently
these Departments/Offices were contacted and the means used to make contact.
3.1 Civil Service Department or Office Contact
6
Any Contact with Govt. Departments in past 12 months
4%
4%
3%
3%
2%
49%
26%
11%
5%
5%
5%
Any Contact
Dept of Social & Family Affairs
Revenue Commissioners
Dept of Foreign Affairs
Dept of Health & Children
Dept of Environment Heritage & Local Govt
Dept of Education & Science
Dept of Agriculture & Food
Dept of Transport
Dept Ent Trade & Employment
Land Registry/Property RegistrationAuthority
Q. For each of the Civil Service Departments and Offices I read out, can you tell me whether or not you have had any contact with them over the past 12 months:
Base: All Respondents (2,007) All other contacts at 1% or less
Contact with any Civil Service Department/Office has shown little change in the last
year, with 49% of the general public interviewed stating that they have had any contact
with any Government Department or Office in the last 12 months compared to 48% in
2008 and 46% in 2005. The most frequently contacted Department is the Department
of Social & Family Affairs, contacted by 26% of all respondents (22% in 2008). The
next most frequently contacted Departments/Offices are the Office of the Revenue
Commissioners (11%), the Department of Foreign Affairs (including the Passport
Office) (5%), the Department of Health and Children (5%) and the Department of
Environment, Heritage and Local Government (5%). No other Civil Service Department
or Office was contacted by more than 4% of respondents.
In terms of frequency of contact, the average number of contacts with a Department or
Office is between 2 and 4 times by each customer.
10
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
3.2 Most Recent Contact
9
Most Recent Contact with a Govt. Department
15%
6%
6%
6%
5%
4%
44%
Q. Which Government Dept or Office did you contact most recently?
All other contacts at 3% or less
Dept of Social & Family Affairs
Office of Revenue Commissioners
Dept of Foreign Affairs
Dept of Env. Heritage & Local Govt
Dept of Agriculture & Food
Dept of Education & Science
Dept of Health & Children
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992)
Respondents were asked with which Department they had their most recent contact.
The purpose of this question is to ensure that respondents’ perceptions of Civil Service
customer delivery is captured through reference to a specific service contact (i.e. their
most recent contact), rather than an accumulation of experiences. This provides for a
more focussed and accurate evaluation of the user’s experience.
In terms of most recent contact, a similar pattern to that of overall contact can be seen.
Of all who had contact with the Civil Service in the past 12 months, the Department
most contacted recently is the Department of Social and Family Affairs which was
contacted by almost half (44%) of all Civil Service customers. The Office of the
Revenue Commissioners was contacted most recently by 15% of all Civil Service
customers. These two Departments alone account for almost 60% of all recent
contacts.
The Department of Foreign Affairs, the Department of the Environment, Heritage &
Local Government and the Department of Agriculture & Food were each contacted
most recently by 6% of Civil Service customers.
11
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
3.3 Nature of Most Recent Contact
12
Nature Most Recent Contact
2%
32%
22%
17%
14%
10%
3%
Enquiring about a particularservice/entitlement/application
Seeking general information
Carrying out a transaction
Seeking payment/collectingallowance
Providing Information
Querying themeaning/accuracy in
documentation received
Other
Q. Thinking about your most recent contact with a Civil Service Dept or Office, which of the following best describes the nature of this contact?
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009)
Those who had contact with a Civil Service Department/Office were also asked for the
reason for their most recent contact. The most popular reason for contact is to enquire
about a particular service/entitlement/application (32%). A further 22% contacted a
Department or Office to seek general information. 17% of customers made contact to
carry out a transaction and 14% of customers were seeking a payment or collecting an
allowance, an increase from 10% in 2009.
12
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
3.4 Method of Contact – Any Contact
16
Methods Ever Used For Contact (05-09)
Q. Which other methods have you ever used?
68%
55%
34%
12%
12%
1%
71%
53%
37%
15%
16%
3%
41%
40%
12%
4%
18%
81%
200920082005
By phone
In person
In writing
Via Internet
Through e-mail
By Fax
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009, n=973 in 2008, n=564 in 2005)
In terms of ‘any’ methods used to contact Government Departments and Offices, 68%
of those who had contacted the Civil Service had contact by phone, compared to 71%
of respondents in 2008 and 81% of respondents in 2005. Thus, while telephone
remains the most used method of contact in the past 12 months, the proportion of
customers using the telephone is falling.
In contrast, the proportion of respondents contacting Government Departments/Offices
in person since 2005 is rising. In 2009, 55% of those who had contacted Government
Departments/Offices in the past 12 months had done so in person, compared to 53% in
2008 and 41% in 2005.
The explanation for this shift in patterns of contact is likely to be caused by a
combination of the increase in the proportion of customers contacting the Department
of Social & Family Affairs, whose customers predominantly rely on personal contact,
and the decrease in those contacting the Office of the Revenue Commissioners, whose
customers are more likely to contact the Office by phone.
The proportion of customers contacting Government Departments/Offices in writing is
also falling. In 2009, 34% of customers had contact with Departments/Offices in writing,
compared to 37% in 2008 and 40% in 2005.
In 2005, the level of contacts by e-mail and via the Internet was much higher than in
13
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
2002 and 1997. However, this level of electronic contact plateaued in 2008, as
displayed in the graph above. In 2009, we see a return to the 2005 levels of contact via
the Internet, with 12% claiming to have contacted the Civil Service via the Internet in
2009. As in 2008, there is a small decrease in 2009 in the proportion of respondents
who are using e-mail to contact Departments and Offices. This might be explained, in
some way, by the proportionate increase in contacts ‘in person’ as a result of the
greater levels of contact generally with the Department of Social and Family Affairs.
3.4.1 Method of Contact – Most Recent
15
Method of Most Recent Contact (05-09)
41%
41%
12%
4%
2%
43%
36%
13%
5%
2%
25%
11%
4%
2%
57%
200920082005
Q. Thinking about this most recent contact, did you mainly deal with the relevant Department or Office by telephone, in writing, by e-mail, via a website or in person?
By phone
In person
In writing
Via Internet
Through e-mail
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009, n=973 in 2008, n=564 in 2005)
The 2009 survey results show that contact in person is now as popular as contact by
phone as a method of most recent contact. This year, 41% of respondents had their
most recent contact by phone, the same proportion that had contact in person. This
represents a significant shift from 2005 when more than twice as many respondents
had contact by phone (57%) as had contact in person (25%).
However, this is not especially surprising, given the consistent increase in the
proportion of customers whose most recent contact was with the Department of Social
and Family Affairs and, as discussed above, the decrease in recent contact with
Revenue.
Other forms of contact remain low for customers’ most recent contact. Most recent
contact in writing (12%) is comparable to the 2008 (13%) and 2005 (11%) figures.
14
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
Electronic forms of contact also remain low for most recent contact, with only 4% of
respondents’ most recent contact coming via Internet and 2% through e-mail.
15
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4. Satisfaction with Customer ServiceThis second chapter of results examines customers’ satisfaction with the level of
service received from a Civil Service Department or Office in the 12 months preceding
the survey. These results detail the levels of satisfaction with the overall service
received and customers’ satisfaction with individual aspects of particular methods of
service delivery (i.e. by phone, in person, etc.). Customer suggestions for
improvements to individual service delivery methods are also identified.
All questions on satisfaction are based on the responses of the 992 respondents who
had contact with a Civil Service Department or Office in the preceding twelve months.
4.1 Overall Satisfaction with Service
11Overall Satisfaction with Service (05-09)
37%
44%
41%
36%
1%42% 36%
5%
5%
6% 6%
6%
8%
8%
7%
9%
1%
1%
2009
2008
2005
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don't know
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had with a Civil Service Department or Office – overall how satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the service you received?
78%
80%
78%
% Allsatisfied
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009, n=973 in 2008, n=564 in 2005)
Overall satisfaction (very/fairly satisfied) with service received by respondents is 78%,
which is consistent with the 2008 (80%) and 2005 (78%) survey results. However,
there is a significant decrease in the proportion of respondents who are very satisfied
with the service they received (37% of respondents claimed to be very satisfied
against 44% in 2008). The proportion of those who are very or fairly dissatisfied (15%)
with the level of service received has remained consistent compared to both the 2008
(14%) and 2005 (15%) surveys.
Respondents were also asked about their service expectations, prior to the most recent
16
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
contact they had with a Civil Service Department or Office.
22
Meeting Service Expectations (08-09)
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had with a Civil Service Department or Office – was the service you received , better than expected, the same as expected or worse than expected?
26%
21% 61%
56% 15%
15% 3%
3%
2009
2008
Better than expected Same as expected Worse than expected Don't know
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009, n=973 in 2008)
The proportion of respondents whose experience was better than expected (21%) in
2009 is lower than in 2008 (26%). However, as in 2008, the proportion of respondents
whose experience was better than expected (21%) remains significantly greater than
the proportion of respondents whose experience was worse than expected (15%).
This decrease in the proportion of respondents whose expectations were exceeded
may be a function of either perceived diminished standards of delivery in 2009 or
increased customer expectations.
17
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.2 Satisfaction with Service Delivery Methods
As well as measuring overall levels of satisfaction with the service received,
respondents were also asked about how satisfied they were with particular service
attributes specific to the method that was used in their most recent contact. Satisfaction
with service by each method is now discussed in turn.
4.2.1 Satisfaction with Service by Phone
31%
30%
28%
27%
29%
18%
5%
8%
14%
41%
40%
41%
41%
39%
38%
33%
17%
21%
24%
7%
7%
11%
11%
9%
6%
8%
9%
19%
6%
8%
22%
3%
4%
4%
4%
4%
6%
10%
6%
10%
14%
14%
14%
15%
14%
15%
55%
42%
17%
25%
5%
8%
6%
7%
5%
5%
4%
6%
15%
15%
Helpfulness of staff
Manner in which staff explained issues/providedinformation
Knowledge of staff
Quality of advice / information received
Ease of finding telephone number
Speed /efficiency with which query dealt with
Speed with which phone answered
Voicemail service
Telephone menu / automated telephone services
Amount of time left holding
Very Satisfied Fairly Satisfied Neither Satisfied nor DissatisfiedFairly Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Don’t know/No answer
25
Satisfaction with Service by Phone
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had by phone, please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with the following? (ranked by mean score)
Base: All Respondents who had any contact with a Govt Dept by phone in the past 12 months (n=675)
% All Satisfied
70%
72%
69%
69%
68%
63%
51%
22%
29%
38%
As in 2008, satisfaction levels with various aspects of service by phone are generally
high. The aspects of service by phone which have the highest levels of satisfaction
relate to staff service, such as the helpfulness of staff (72% satisfied), the manner in
which staff explained issues/provided information (70%), knowledge of staff (69%), and
the quality of advice/information received (69%). However, compared to 2008, there
are significant decreases in the proportion of respondents who are very satisfied with
each of these aspects of service by phone.
Dissatisfaction with certain aspects of phone contact has also risen considerably since
2008. The highest level of overall dissatisfaction expressed is for the amount of time
left holding, with which 36% of phone customers were very/fairly dissatisfied in 2009
compared to 26% in 2008. 29% of phone customers were dissatisfied with the speed
with which the phone was answered, compared to 22% in 2008. As in 2008, a large
18
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
cohort of respondents gave no answer or did not know how to respond with regard to
voicemail services and automated telephone services. This is most likely because they
had no experience of these features.
Finally, in relation to phone service, phone customers were asked to identify one
aspect that most needs improving, based on their most recent contact by phone. The
results are displayed in the chart below.
26
Service by Phone - Improvements Required
20%
12%
7%
7%
6%
4%
3%
2%
2%
17%
17%
4%
Amount of time left holding
Speed with which phone answeredTelephone menu / automated telephone
servicesSpeed /efficiency with which query dealt with
Ease of finding telephone number
Helpfulness of staff
Knowledge of staffManner in which staff explained
issues/provided informationQuality of advice / information received
Voicemail service
Nothing needs improving
Don't Know
Q. Thinking about the most recent contact you had by phone, what ONE thing from this list do you think most needs improving?
Base: All Respondents who had any contact by phone with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=675)
The aspects of phone service most frequently identified as requiring improvement echo
those aspects that recorded the highest levels of dissatisfaction, that is, the amount of
time left holding (20%) and the speed with which the phone was answered (12%). As in
previous surveys, timeliness of services represents a recurring concern for phone
customers.
17% of respondents said that nothing needs improving and a further 17% were unable
to identify any required improvements.
19
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.2.2 Satisfaction with Service in Person
31
Satisfaction with Service in Person
38%
33%
36%
34%
32%
21%
16%
26%
26%
22%
19%
36%
41%
36%
38%
37%
39%
38%
25%
37%
34%
41%
34%
6%
7%
7%
5%
7%
7%
9%
12%
7%
7%
7%
8%
5%
6%
8%
11%
14%
13%
14%
14%
5%
2%
5%
5%
6%
5%
4%
7%
8%
6%
13%
10%
10%
10%
11%
16%
38%
9%
11%
11%
12%
30%
4%
7%
5%
7%
5%
10%
10%
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don’t know/No answer
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had in person, please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with the following? (ranked by mean score)
AllSatisfied%
74%
75%
73%
72%70%70%
Base: All Respondents who had any contact in person with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=548)
59%
41%
63%61%
62%
53%
Design and layout of forms
Help received in filling out forms
Privacy of Conversation/transactionSpeed/efficiency with which query
was addressedHours of Business
Queuing System
Helpfulness of staff
Location of Department/Office
Knowledge of staff
Quality of advice / information received
Manner in which staff explained issuesPublic service area facilities
With regard to satisfaction with service received in person, there are again relatively
high levels of satisfaction with service attributes relating to staff, such as the
helpfulness (74%) and knowledge (73%) of staff. As with services received by phone,
there is less overall satisfaction with the timeliness of delivery. For example, more than
one in every five (21%) customers were dissatisfied with the speed/efficiency with
which queries were addressed. However, some of this dissatisfaction may relate to the
physical environment associated with services delivered in person, as represented by
the 27% of customers who were dissatisfied overall with the queuing system.
While phone customers are significantly less likely to be very satisfied with aspects of
the service than they were in 2008, as discussed in the previous section, this is not the
case for ‘in person’ customers. Thus, the proportion of customers very satisfied with the
helpfulness of staff and the knowledge of staff received in person has not decreased to
the same extent as it has for phone customers.
There is also evidence that there is lower dissatisfaction with certain aspects of service
received in person in 2009. In 2008, there was a substantial minority (21%) of these
customers who were dissatisfied with the quality of advice/information received.
However, in 2009, only 12% were dissatisfied with the quality of advice and information
received.
20
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
‘In person’ customers were also asked to identify one aspect of service that most
needs improving, based on their most recent contact in person. The results are
displayed in the chart below.
31
Service in Person – Improvements Required
14%
10%
7%
7%
6%
5%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
11%
19%
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had in person, what ONE thing from this list do you think most needs improving?
Base: All Respondents who had any contact in person with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=548)
Queuing System
Speed/efficiency with which query was addressed
Hours of Business
Quality of advice/information receivedDesign and layout of forms
Public Service Area Facilities
Knowledge of staff
Manner in which staff explained issues/provided informationHelpfulness of staff
Privacy of conversation/transaction
Location of Department/Office
Help received in filling out forms
OtherNothing needs improving
Don’t Know
Again, timeliness features strongly in the improvements required. 14% of ‘in person’
customers identify the queuing system and 10% of customers identify the
spend/efficiency with which queries were addressed as the aspects most requiring
improvements.
Just under one-fifth (19%) of respondents said that nothing needs improving and a
further 11% were unable to identify an aspect that needs improvement.
21
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.2.3 Satisfaction with Service in Writing
29%
21%
20%
20%
19%
43%
46%
40%
40%
22%
6%
8% 25%
6%
25%
22%
24%
4%
4%
5%
4%
2%
8%
6%
1%
1%
3%
3%
22%
24%
Ease of finding correctaddress/contact
person
Clarity of languageused in writtencommunication
Quality ofadvice/information
received
Speed and efficiencyof response to query
Design and layout offorms
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don’t know/No answer
27
Satisfaction with Service in Writing
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had in writing, please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with the following? (ranked by mean score)
% AllSatisfied
72%
67%
60%
60%
41%
Base: All Respondents who had any contact in writing with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=340)
Turning to customer satisfaction with service in writing, the chart above suggests lower
levels of user engagement overall with service in writing compared with customer
experiences of service by phone or in person, as evidenced by the high level of non-
response (don’t know or no answer) on service attributes. While service by phone or in
person revealed relatively high levels of satisfaction with staff attributes, customer-staff
interaction does not apply to the same degree with service in writing.
In 2008, the aspect of service in writing that attracts the highest level of dissatisfaction
(15%) was the speed and efficiency of response to their query. However, in 2009, 28%
of customers were dissatisfied with the design and layout of forms.
This is reflected in the improvements required as identified by customers who had
contact in writing, 27% of whom identified the design and layout of forms as the
improvement most required. At best, poor design and layout of forms poses a
psychological burden to users. At worst, it can render services inaccessible to users
with poor numeracy or literacy skills.
22
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.2.4 Satisfaction with Service by E-mail
32
Satisfaction with Service by E-Mail
29%
35%
20%
21%
27%
19%
26%
27%
2%
1%
3%
3%
7%
8%
39%
37%
4%
5%
2%
6% 3%
3%
36%
37%Clarity of language
used in e-mail
Ease of findingcorrect e-mail
address/contact
Quality ofadvice/information
received
Speed/efficiency ofresponse to query
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don’t know/No answer
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had through e-mail, please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with the following? (ranked by mean score)
Base: All Respondents who had any contact through email with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=115)
% AllSatisfied
56%
45%
46%
48%
As discussed above, the level of customer contact by e-mail remains low compared to
service by phone or in person. While satisfaction with aspects of service by e-mail is
also lower than most aspects of service by phone or person, there is relatively little
dissatisfaction expressed for the different factors of service related to e-mail. The large
proportions of “don’t know” responses may be a function of the lower level of
engagement associated with this contact method, which may encourage less
consideration by users.
However, as this method becomes more popular, it may be useful to prioritise
improvements to those aspects of e-mail service with which customers are particularly
dissatisfied. 9% of e-mail customers were very dissatisfied or fairly dissatisfied with the
quality of advice/information received. 13% of e-mail customers were very dissatisfied
or fairly dissatisfied with the speed and efficiency of response to their query, compared
to 8% in the 2008 survey.
Nonetheless, despite the fact that relatively low numbers of customers have made
contact with a Government Department or Office by e-mail, these users appear broadly
satisfied overall, indicating that the use of such services can yield positive results in
terms of an efficient user experience.
23
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.2.5 Satisfaction with Service via Internet
37
Satisfaction with Service via Internet
43%
35%
34%
37%
33%
33%
29%
31%
30%
29%
32%
14%
16%
16%
20%
18%
17%
21%
15%
3%
3%
5%
4%
7%
5%
3%
5%
1%
3%
3%
3%
2%
3%
5%
3%
5%
6%
3%
3%
2%
3%
3%
3%
43%
35%
41%
39%
35%
50%
38%
44%
46%
36%
34%
23%
12%
15%
20% 3%
2%
3%
2%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
1%
37%
43%
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don’t know/No answer
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had via Internet, please tell me how satisfied or dissatisfied you were with the following? (ranked by mean score)
Base: All Respondents who had any contact via Internet with a Govt Dept in the past 12 months (n=119)
% All Satisfied
57%51%
50%57%51%
50%
Ease of finding website
Ease of using serviceEfficiency of service
Information/documents available on website
Ease of downloading materialClarity of on-line forms
Presentation of websiteSpeed of response of service or follow up
Quality of advice/information receivedComprehensiveness of service
Speed/efficiency of response to query
Ease of navigating website
55%41%52%
45%45%
52%
As with service by e-mail, a much smaller number of respondents had experience of
service via Internet compared to traditional methods of customer service. Given the
relatively small number of Civil Service customers who had contact via Internet, it
would be unreliable to derive strong conclusions from their experience.
Compared to 2008 results, there are significantly higher levels of satisfaction with
almost every aspect of service via Internet. There are also extremely low levels of
dissatisfaction associated with individual aspects of service. 9% of respondents were
dissatisfied with the ease of navigating websites and 8% were dissatisfied with the
speed/efficiency of responses to queries. However, there is very little dissatisfaction
with website design or the efficiency of service delivery.
Typical forms of customer contact via Internet, such as the submission of an online
form or a request for information through a Departmental website, do not necessarily
require response from, or involve contact with, Civil Service officials and, as such, are
significantly less interactive than other forms of contact. This lack of interactivity may
encourage less consideration by users of the quality of specific aspects of the service
delivery, hence the high levels of non-response depicted above.
Once again, despite the low numbers of customers that have made contact via the
internet, their positive experiences augur well for the potential of this channel, where
appropriate.
24
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.3 Dissatisfaction with Service or Contact
42
Dissatisfaction with Any Aspect of Service or Contact (08-09) - All respondents
Q. Have you been very or fairly dissatisfied with any aspect of service/contact you received from a Civil Service Department or office in the past 12 months?
15%
17% 83%
85%2009
2008
Yes No
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008)
Following exploration of their most recent contact with Civil Service Departments or
Offices, all respondents were then asked if they had been very or fairly dissatisfied with
any aspect of service received from a Civil Service Department or Office in the past 12
months. 15% of all respondents said that had been dissatisfied with some aspect of
service received from a Civil Service Department or Office in the past 12 months,
compared to 17% in 2008. However, this change is not statistically significant.
Customers’ reasons for dissatisfaction and other potential motivations for unfavourable
perceptions of customer service from Civil Service Departments or Offices were then
explored in greater detail. This was an open ended-question. As such, respondents
were not presented with or prompted for specific response items and were encouraged
to provide further details regarding the specific reasons for their dissatisfaction.
These open-ended answers were coded thematically. The first step was to create a
code frame of verbatim comments, from which recurring themes could be identified
through systematic coding. Having coded the verbatim comments of respondents, it is
also possible to examine the quantitative distribution of themes across the sample of
dissatisfied respondents. By collating reasons for dissatisfaction across contact
methods and service encounters, it is possible to identify the common drivers of
dissatisfaction for Civil Service customers. This quantitative distribution is presented,
along with exemplary verbatim comments.
25
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
4.3.1 Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Service or Contact
41
Reasons for Dissatisfaction with Service or Contact
Base: All respondents dissatisfied with any aspect of service/contact in the past 12 months (n=311)
Q. Can you tell me more about the reasons why you were dissatisfied?
30%
19%
19%
15%
10%
7%
7%
6%
5%
4%
4%
2%
7%
(All > 2%)
Process too slow
Attitude of staff/rushed
Waiting time on phone/holding time/automated service
Lack of knowledge of staff
Provided wrong information
Not entitled to benefit/pension/disappointing outcome
Poor customer care/staff not trained to deal with customers
Lack of privacy
Office not clearly laid out /poor queuing system
Not enough staff on duty
No response to written query/email/phone message
Lack of communication between staff/Depts
One person dealing with enquiry/not passed around
(26%)
(20%)
(21%)
(18%)
(9%)
(13%)
(11%)
(7%)
(3%)
(%) = 2008 data
As illustrated above, and reflecting the survey results on satisfaction discussed
previously, the main reasons for dissatisfaction identified by respondents relate to the
timeliness of service delivery, as well as the speed and quality of response by staff.
The comparative results from the 2008 are also displayed above and demonstrate the
consistency of the main drivers of customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
30% of customers identify the speed of the process as a reason for dissatisfaction with
a specific contact. A further 19% of customers identify being rushed by staff as a
reason for dissatisfaction and the same proportion (19%) of customers identify waiting
time and holding time on the phone. Thus, customers tend to identify aspects relating
to the timeliness of service delivery as one of the main reasons for dissatisfaction. Of
course, there is often more than one reason for a dissatisfactory service encounter, as
the quotation below demonstrates:
“My wife asked for XXXX Allowance and her file got lost. It took six months to find and
when I rang, most of the staff were quite rude over the phone until I got talking to the
right person. Phone calls were not returned and I had to keep ringing back until I was
able to deal with a supervisor.”
In 2008, qualitative analysis of these verbatim responses showed that there were two
fundamental explanations for customer dissatisfaction. Firstly, dissatisfaction occurred
when a satisfactory explanation for a particular decision was not forthcoming or when
26
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
there was no guidance on next steps for the customer. This can be characterised as an
unresolved contact and was seen by customers as failure at an interpersonal level by
the official dealing with them. This is captured in the thematic analysis by
dissatisfaction caused by the lack of knowledge of staff or the attitude of staff:
Secondly, and more fundamentally, dissatisfaction occurred as the result of a systemic
failure to prioritise the requirements of the customer:
“You call at normal working hours and half the time you don't get a response,
particularly early morning and lunch hours. There should be a service all throughout
the day and key departments should be open Saturdays with minimum service
available”.
The conundrum is that officials adhering to existing quality customer service
procedures and processes may nonetheless produce a dissatisfactory service for
customers, as illustrated by the following customer quotation:
“Their reply just seemed very short and negative and with no come back possible from
my end.”
While officials may consider the delivery of quality customer service in terms of their
specific roles and responsibilities for each customer contact, individual customer
requirements can cut across Departmental functions, requiring multiple contacts with
different Departments and Offices for the resolution of a single query. This suggests
that appreciating the customer journey as a whole, rather than as a collection of
discrete contacts with individual Departments and Offices, is fundamental to a user-
centred evaluation of quality customer service.
In 2009, 15% of the entire sample was dissatisfied with some aspect of service
received from the Civil Service in the last 12 months, a total of 311 respondents.
Further analysis indicates that this group only differs from the main sample in terms of
their age (significantly more likely to be aged 25-39) and gender (significantly more
likely to be female).
27
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5. Perceptions of the Civil ServiceThis chapter examines advocacy of the Civil Service, perceptions of Civil Service
efficiency and general attitudes towards the Irish Civil Service as an organisation
among customers and non-customers.
Results from a number of studies indicate that trust levels in Ireland are declining
generally. It is worth noting that a useful context for this trend is provided later in this
chapter in Section 5.4.4 - Declining Levels of Trust – External Data.
5.1 Civil Service Advocacy
All respondents interviewed were asked whether they would speak highly or be critical
of the Civil Service to other people, based on their own experiences or impressions.
The question was therefore asked of customers and non-customers, those with
experience of service delivery and those without.
45
Advocacy Towards Civil Service (05-09)- All Respondents
6% 22%
24%
46% 5%
5%
2%
4%
3% 29%
50%
50% 12%
15%
16%
4%
5%
4%
2009
2008
2005
Would speak highly without being asked Would speak highly if I am askedWould be neutral Would be critical if I am askedWould be critical without being asked Don't Know
Q. Taking into account your own experiences or impressions, which of these phrases best describes the way you would speak of the Civil Service to other people?
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
28%
28%
32%
21%
20%
16%
% Critics% Advocates
28% of respondents reported that they would speak highly of the Civil Service based
on their own experience or impressions, which is the same level of advocacy recorded
in 2008. 21% of respondents reported that they would be critical of the Civil Service,
compared to 20% of respondents in 2008 and 16% of respondents in 2005.
Approximately half of all respondents interviewed would be neutral towards the Civil
Service, which is consistent with the 2008 and 2005 results.
28
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
The 2009 results also demonstrate the influence of contact with a Government
Department or Office on customer advocacy. The table below shows that there is a
significant difference in levels of customer advocacy between respondents who had
contact and those who did not have contact.
50
Advocacy Towards Civil Service The influence of contact
7% 24%
20%
45%
4%6% 47% 15%
18% 6%1%
8%
Would speak highly without being asked Would speak highly if I am askedWould be neutral Would be critical if I am askedWould be critical without being asked Don't Know
Q. Taking into account your own experiences or impressions, which of these phrases best describes the way you would speak of the Civil Service to other people?
Base: All respondents
All who had contactwith any Govt Dept/Office
in the last 12 months (n=992)
All who had no contactwith any Govt Dept/Office
in the last 12 months (n=1015)
Those with contact were both more likely to speak highly and more likely to be critical
of the Civil Service than those without contact. 31% of those with contact would speak
highly of the Civil Service, based on their experiences and impressions, whereas only
26% of those without contact would do likewise. Similarly, 24% of those with contact
would be critical of the Civil Service, based on their experiences and impressions,
compared to 19% of those without contact.
29
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.2 Perceptions of Civil Service Efficiency
All respondents were asked about their impression of how efficient they feel the Civil
Service is.
48
Impression of Civil Service Efficiency (05-09)
16%
15%
16%
40%
45%
46%
17%
15%
24% 10%
7%
5%
3%1%
12%
15% 5%
8%
2009
2008
2005
Very Efficient Fairly Efficient No Opinion Either WayFairly Inefficient Very Inefficient Don't know
Q. Thinking of the Civil Service in overall terms, I would like you to give me your impression of how efficient you feel it is?
% All Efficient
57%
62%
60%
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
The Civil Service is perceived as very efficient or fairly efficient by 57% of respondents
(after statistical rounding) in 2009, compared to 60% in 2008 and 62% of respondents
in 2005. 22% of respondents believed the Civil Service to be very or fairly inefficient,
compared to 17% in 2008 and 13% of respondents in 2005.
As with levels of advocacy, there are differences in the perceptions of efficiency
between those who had contact with the Civil Service and those who did not have
contact. 65% of respondents with contact perceived the Civil Service to be very or fairly
efficient, compared to 49% of respondents without contact. Equally, 24% of
respondents with contact perceived the Civil Service to be very or fairly inefficient,
compared to 19% of respondents without contact.
Thus, while almost two-thirds (65%) of its customers perceive the Civil Service as a
whole to be efficient, less than one in every two (49%) non-customers do not.
30
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.3 Familiarity with the Civil Service
54
Familiarity with the Civil Service (05-09)
Q. Taking into account your own experiences as well as any impressions you may have formed from any source, how familiar or unfamiliar do you feel you are with the workings of the Civil Service as they affect you?
11%
8%
9%
41%
37%
31%
12%
13%
19% 29%
11%
13%
12%
27%
22% 3%
2%
2009
2008
2005
Very Familiar Fairly Familiar No Opinion Either WayFairly Unfamiliar Very Unfamiliar Don't know
% All Familiar
52%
45%
40%
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
52% of respondents felt they were familiar with the workings of the Civil Service, a
significant increase in familiarity, compared to levels recorded in 2008 (45%) and 2005
(40%). The proportion of respondents claiming to be fairly or very unfamiliar with the
Civil Service (33%) has also decreased significantly from 2008 (40%) and 2005 (41%)
levels.
Once again, those with contact are much more likely to consider themselves familiar
with the Irish Civil Service than those without contact. 60% of those with contact
consider themselves familiar with the working of the Irish Civil Service, compared to
43% of those without contact. In 2008, 33% of those without contact considered
themselves familiar with the working of the Civil Service.
Taken together, the comparison of results relating to familiarity from this year’s survey
and previous surveys demonstrates significant rises in the level of stated awareness of
the workings of the Civil Service by both customers and non-customers. This rise in
awareness may be a function of the emphasis of recent public service modernisation
initiatives on openness and transparency, as well as increases in media reporting of
the workings of the Civil Service.
31
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.4 Favourability with the Civil Service
55
Favourability with Civil Service (05-09)
Q. Taking into account your own experiences or impressions, how favourable is your opinion of the way in which Civil Servants meet the needs of the public?
11%
9%
9%
41%
46%
48%
22%
23%
24% 10%
6%
5%
3%
14%
16% 5%
4%
2009
2008
2005
Very Favourable Fairly Favourable No Opinion Either WayFairly Unfavourable Very Unfavourable Don't know
% All Favourable
52%
55%
57%
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
The 2009 survey shows a decrease in the proportion of respondents with very
favourable or fairly favourable opinions of the way in which the Civil Service meets the
needs of the public, compared to the 2008 and 2005 surveys. In 2008, 55% of
respondents had a favourable opinion, compared to 57% in 2005. In 2009, the
proportion of respondents with favourable opinions is 52%.
There is also an equivalent increase in the proportion of respondents with very
unfavourable or fairly unfavourable opinions of the Civil Service, compared to 2008 and
2005. In 2009, the proportion of respondents with unfavourable opinions is 22%,
compared to 19% in 2008 and 13% in 2005.
Once again, those with contact are much more likely to have a favourable opinion of
the Irish Civil Service compared to those without contact. 60% of those with contact
have a favourable opinion of the Irish Civil Service, compared to 44% of those without
contact.
32
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.4.1 Trends in Favourability & Familiarity
Typically, customer satisfaction research suggests that as familiarity with a particular
organisation rises, so too does favourability. However, trends over recent surveys run
contrary to this expected relationship between favourability and familiarity with the Civil
Service. While familiarity among the general public has increased steadily from 40% to
52% between 2005 and 2009, favourability has declined from 57% to 52% within the
same timeframe. Thus, the level of familiarity has increased at more than twice the rate
the level of favourability has been declining between 2005 and 2009, as depicted in the
graph below.
53
52%40% 45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%% Very/Fairly Familiar % Very/Fairly Favourable
Familiarity/Favourability with the Civil Service (05-09)
2005 2008 2009
%
Q. Taking into account your own experiences as well as any impressions you may have formed from any source, how familiar or unfamiliar do you feel you are with the workings of the Civil Service as they affect you? How favourable is your opinion of the way in which Civil Servants meet the needs of the public?
52%55%57%
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
As discussed in the introduction to the report, the nature of service delivery in the
public sector differs from that of private sector organisations in that all members of the
general public are stakeholders, though not always service users. For the Civil Service,
stakeholders may have perceptions of its performance, without direct experience of the
services it provides. It is important to note that, despite the small decline in favourability
among the general public, satisfaction among customers remains relatively static.
Furthermore, as in 2008, customers are consistently more positive in their perceptions
of the Civil Service than those who have not had contact in the past 12 months.
33
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.5 Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation
Respondents were also asked a series of statements about the Irish Civil Service and
asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed with the statements. Respondents were
presented with both ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ statements about the Civil Service. We
begin by reporting respondents’ opinions on a selection of these ‘positive’ and
‘negative’ statements before examining separately a selection of statements for which
the level of agreement has significantly decreased compared to 2008.
5.5.1 Positive Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation
51Civil Service Perceptions: Positive Statements
28%
11%
10%
6%
40%
39%
39%
23%
10%
17%
14%
18%
16%
5%
5%
10%
16%
28%
13%
5%
15%
1%17%
15%
The Civil Service offers good career prospectsfor its employees
I feel that the service provided by the CivilService has improved in the last 5 years
The Civil Service has become more customerfocussed over the past 5 years
The Civil Service has good procedures formaking complaints about levels of service
received
Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor DisagreeDisagree Strongly Disagree Don't know
Q. Now thinking about the Irish Civil Service in general, please tell me to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statements? (ranked by mean scores)
Base: All Respondents (2,007)
% All Agree
50%
49%
29%
67%
Over two-thirds (67%) of respondents agreed that the Irish Civil Service offers good
career prospects for its employees. Half (50%) of all respondents agreed that I feel that
the service provided by the Civil Service has improved in the last 5 years and a similar
proportion (49%) agreed that The Civil Service has become more customer focussed
over the past 5 years. Approximately a fifth of all respondents disagree with the same
two statements.
Less than one-third (31%) of respondents agreed that the Civil Service has good
procedures for making complaints about levels of service received, with one-quarter
(25%) of respondents disagreeing with this statement.
34
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.5.2 Negative Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation
52Civil Service Perceptions: Negative Statements
Base: All Respondents (2,007)
70%
68%
38%
44%
41%
Q. Now thinking about the Irish Civil Service in general, please tell me to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statements? (ranked by mean scores)
31%
16%
12%
12%
13%
39%
52%
26%
32%
28%
9%
10%
24%
15%
12%
18%
30%
3%
4%
8%
8%
16%
6%
9%
15%
9%
27%
3%9%
4%
The Civil Service has too much red tape
I get most of my information about the CivilService from coverage in the newspaper, TV or
radio
Private sector organisations give a better servicethan the Civil Service
The Civil Service is an old-fashionedorganisation
It is difficult to get information you need fromthe Civil Service/Deps/ Offices
Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor DisagreeDisagree Strongly Disagree Don't know
% All Agree
70% of respondents agreed that the Civil Service has too much red tape. While the
level of agreement with the statement Private sector organisations give a better service
than the Civil Service is consistent with the 2008 results, there is a significant decrease
in the proportion of respondents who disagreed with this statement (22%) in 2009,
compared to 2008 (34%).
In 2008, more respondents disagreed (42%) than agreed (38%) that it is difficult to get
information you need from Civil Service Departments or Offices. However, in 2009, this
has reversed. The proportion agreeing (41%) with this statement is higher than the
proportion disagreeing (38%).
Finally, 68% of respondents agreed with the statement I get most of my information
about the Civil Service from coverage in the newspapers, television or radio. 74% of
those without contact agreed with this statement, compared to 62% of those with
contact. As previously reported, those with contact had significantly more positive
perceptions than those without contact.
35
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.5.3 Changes in Public Perceptions of the Civil Service as an Organisation – Declining Trust?
Overall, the level of agreement with both positive and negative statements is largely
unchanged from 2008. However, there have been significant differences between the
levels of agreement with three attitudinal statements between 2008 and 2009.
50Changes in Public Perceptions (05-09)
61%
50%
61%
60%
54%
47%
55%
62%
67%
Agree Strongly/Fairly
2009
2009
2009
2008
2005
2008
2005
2008
2005
The Civil Service deals with people in a
fair and equal way
The Civil Service serves all segments of society
in Ireland equally
The Civil Service is independent and
trustworthy
Q. Now thinking about the Irish Civil Service in general, please tell me to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statements? (ranked by mean scores)
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005)
As illustrated in the graph above, there have been significant decreases since 2008 in
the proportion of the general public that agrees that the Civil Service is independent
and trustworthy, that it serves all segments of society equally and that it deals with
people in a fair and equal way. It is noteworthy that the proportions agreeing with these
statements have decreased by roughly the same amount - between 11% and 13% -
since 2005.
The negative changes in these three statements since 2005 are particularly interesting
because all three statements relate to the objectivity of the Civil Service, in terms of its
independence and fairness, in dealing with customers. Despite these changes in public
opinion, levels of customer satisfaction recorded over the three surveys conducted
between 2005 and 2009 have remained consistent. Therefore, we may need to look
beyond direct experiences of service delivery for explanations for the decline in the
perceived independence and fairness of the Civil Service.
The first explanation may relate more directly to effective communications rather than
36
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
performance. Research conducted by Ipsos MORI in the UK consistently demonstrates
a positive relationship between levels of awareness of communications by public
service providers and customer satisfaction. This decline in positive perceptions of the
Civil Service’s independence and fairness may be considered a communications rather
than a performance challenge.
A second possible explanation for this increase in negative attitudes may lie in the
declining levels of trust generally, among the wider public. Most public service
modernisation initiatives are often underpinned by the assumption that increasing
quality will lead to increasing trust in public administration and government, generally.
However, not all of these respondents have experience of Civil Service delivery. The
chart below illustrates how the attitudes of those with experience of satisfactory service
delivery in the last 12 months compare to those who had dissatisfactory service
experiences and to those who had no experience of Civil Service delivery.
Public Perceptions by Quality of Contact
26%
59%
46%
51%
32%
66%
54%
27%
46%
Satisfactory experience
Dissatisfactory experience
No contact / neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Satisfactory experience
Dissatisfactory experience
No contact / neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Satisfactory experience
Dissatisfactory experience
No contact / neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
The Civil Service deals with people in a fair and equal way
The Civil Service serves all segments of society in Ireland equally
The Civil Service is independent and trustworthy
Q. Now thinking about the Irish Civil Service in general, please tell me to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Base: Satisfactory experience (n=775), Dissatisfactory experience (n=152), No contact / no opinion (n=1,080)
It is evident that those respondents who were satisfied with the service received were
more likely to say that they agreed with the positive statements set out above. Those
who had a negative experience were considerably more likely to have negative
attitudes. Respondents with no contact at all, or who had no opinion (neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied), generally fell between the satisfied and dissatisfied cohorts in their
attitudes.
37
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
5.5.4 Declining Levels of Trust – External Data
The apparent fall in trust for the Civil Service mirrors that of other sectors, as evidenced
by other data from recent studies.
Ipsos MORI’s Trust in People and Professions study1 recently examined trust in people
and professions among a sample of the general public, benchmarking data from
January 2010 against results first gathered in 2005. Similar declines in trust were
uncovered in this survey.
Trust in People and Professions: 2010 - 2005
32%
59%
92%
77%
21%
40%
62%
20%
83%
86%
83%
40%
29%
63%
92%
66%
23%
45%
66%
21%
80%
89%
82%
47%
Business Leaders
Civil Servants
Doctors
Gardaí
Government Ministers
Journalists
Ordinary man/woman in the street
Politicians generally
Scientists
Teachers
Television news readers
Trade Union officials
20102005
Base: (1,000) Adults aged 16+ - Ipsos MRBI Omnibus Survey, Jan 2010
The results show that just one in three of those surveyed trust business leaders (32%),
albeit showing a slight increase since 2005. One in five of those surveyed trust
politicians generally, with a similar proportion trusting Government Ministers – both of
these results show little change since 2005. In the same time period, trust in civil
servants has declined (down from 63% to 59%), journalists (from 45% to 40%) and
trade union officials (down from 47% to 40%).
Trust in doctors, scientists and teachers remains high, with the latter falling slightly.
Trust in the Gardaí, meanwhile, has increased from 66% to 77%.
1 Source : Ipsos MORI – Trust in People and Professions 2010.
38
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
Consideration of a second external report provides further evidence of this decline in
trust. Edelman’s Trust Barometer (2010)2, a survey of opinion leaders recently
published, highlights that in contrast to other European countries, Ireland is
experiencing “a profound and continuing trust crisis”. The findings show that Irish
respondents have the lowest level of trust in politics of the 22 countries surveyed.
The data shows that trust in a number of important institutions, across all areas of
public life, is the lowest in Europe. Indeed, Ireland was the only country surveyed by
Edelman that experienced declines in trust across four areas; business, government,
media and NGOs.
The results from both of these studies help to put the results of the Irish Civil Service
Customer Satisfaction Survey 2009 in context, by demonstrating that declining levels of
trust are being experienced across a variety of Irish institutions and professions.
2 Source: http://www.edelman.ie/index.php/insights/trust-barometer/ The Edelman trust survey 2010 was undertaken via telephone with a sample of 4,875 college educated 25-64 year old members of the public (“opinion leaders”) across 25 countries.
39
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
6. Access to ServicesThis chapter examines the experiences and perceptions of customers and non-
customers with regard to access to services provided by the Irish Civil Service. This
included the perceived convenience of current service delivery methods as well as
access to necessary services by Irish language speakers and those respondents
whose first language was other than Irish or English.
6.1 Convenience of Contact Methods
42
78%84%80% 86%
63%66%67%72%
27%
47%48%
51%
48%
50%
25%
46%50%
45%44%37%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
By Telephone In Writing By E-mail Via Internet Visiting Dept/Office in person
Perceived Convenience of Contact Methods (02-09)
Base: All respondents (n=2,007 in 2009, n=2,002 in 2008, n=1,226 in 2005, n=1,001 in 2002)
Q. Thinking of future dealing you may have with Civil Service Departments or Offices, please tell me how convenient or inconvenient each of the following methods of communication would be for you if you were contacting a Govt Dept?
2002 2005 2008 2009
% very/fairly convenient
In terms of future contact, all respondents were asked to rate how convenient or
inconvenient various methods of communication would be for contacting a Government
Department or Office. As one might expect, the most used method is also perceived
as the most convenient. Overall, 78% of respondents would find telephone a
convenient method of communication, compared to 84% of respondents in 2008.
Visiting a Department or Office in person is now considered convenient by 50% of
respondents, compared to 45% in 2008, 44% in 2005 and 37% in 2002.
Despite the currently low levels of service uptake via electronic methods, the chart
above suggests that such methods may be increasingly seen as more convenient,
particularly when compared to the results for 2005 and 2002. E-mail and Internet are
now considered convenient (very/fairly convenient) for around 50% of respondents.
40
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
While this underlines the importance of monitoring the potential for the development of
electronic service delivery where appropriate, it is important to remember that the chart
above represents the perceived convenience of such forms of contact for all members
of the general public. It remains the case that electronic service methods have seen
low levels of uptake by existing customers for existing services. For example, 34% of
respondents from lower socio-economic occupational groupings consider e-mail
contact to be personally convenient, compared to 63% of respondents from higher
socio-economic occupational groupings.
6.2 Language Services
Those respondents who required Irish language services and those whose first
language was neither Irish nor English were also asked about their experience of
accessing necessary services from Irish Civil Service Departments or Offices.
6.2.1 Irish Language Services
The purpose of the 2003 Official Languages Act is to ensure that those who require the
availability of Irish language services for dealing with the Civil Service, or any other
official purpose in the State, can access necessary services in Irish. Of the total
sample, only 2% had ever used a service from the Irish Civil Service in the Irish
language. A similar proportion, 2%, also expressed a preference for receiving services
in Irish, if the levels and quality of the services offered were the same in both Irish and
English. Of those who had accessed Irish language services, 67% were very satisfied
or fairly satisfied with the level of service received in the Irish language. 13% were very
dissatisfied or fairly dissatisfied with the level of service received.
However, it is worth bearing in mind that, while the overall survey sample is
representative of the population as a whole, this small sample of Irish language service
users is unlikely to be wholly representative of the Irish-speaking population and does
not represent a reliable basis for service-critical policy decisions in this area.
41
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
6.2.2 Satisfaction with Access to Services (other languages)
60Satisfaction with Access to Services (05-09)Q. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with access to necessary services from the Civil Service?
Base: All Respondents whose 1st language is something other than Irish or English (n=70 in 2005, n=127 in 2008 and n=107 in 2009)
21%
23%
9%
32%
37%
55%
18%
14%
19% 14%
3%
3%
21%
5%
3% 23%
18%
2009
2008
2005
Very Satisfied Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied Don't know
% All Satisfied
53%
60%
64%
5% of the sample claimed to have a first language that is something other than Irish or
English. This sub-group were then asked how satisfied they were with access to
necessary services from the Civil Service. 53% of those with a first language other than
Irish or English were satisfied with the access to necessary services from the Civil
Service. Only 6% were dissatisfied, compared to 8% in 2008 and 14% in 2005. This
might be illustrative of ongoing work being done by the Civil Service to meet the needs
of this customer base. However, because of the small sample who answered this
question, this result should only be considered indicative.
42
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
7. Understanding Customer ContactThe Irish Civil Service customer survey provides an objective evaluation of customer
satisfaction with overall levels of service provided by Civil Service Departments and
Offices, as well as public attitudes to and perceptions of the Civil Service as a whole.
While the 2009 survey results are largely positive, showing that overall levels of
customer satisfaction are consistent with previous surveys, the findings relating to
customer dissatisfaction discussed in the 2008 customer survey report also remain
relevant3.
The purpose of this section is to extend our understanding of satisfaction by analysing
different aspects of customer contact and their relevance to customers’ evaluations of
service delivery. This is discussed with specific reference to the Department for Social
& Family Affairs (DSFA) and the Office of the Revenue Commissioners (Revenue), as
exemplars of two contrasting Civil Service customer experiences.
7.1 The Nature of Customer Contact
There have been significant changes in the nature of customer contact in the period
between 2005 and 2009. Specifically, the proportion of DSFA customers as a
proportion of all Civil Service customers has been rising since 2005, while the
proportion of Revenue customers has been steadily falling. In 2009, approximately one
in every four (26%) members of the public had contact with DSFA, compared to
roughly one in every ten (11%) who had contact with Revenue.
As these two Departments account for the majority of public contact with the Civil
Service, customer experiences with both Departments have a significant influence on
the overall level of customer satisfaction with the Irish Civil Service. The chart overleaf
shows the significant difference between the overall satisfaction with service of DSFA
customers and that of Revenue customers.
3 The five most common explanations for dissatisfaction provided by respondents in 2008 were:
process too slow or complex; attitude of staff; perceived lack of knowledge or information not
provided; lack of privacy and waiting time for phone or left holding.
43
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
19
41%
34%
8%1%
10%
6% 40%
5%3%1%
4%
47%
Dept of Social & Family Affairs Office of Revenue Commissioners
Q. Thinking of the most recent contact you had with a Civil Service Department or Office – overall how satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the service you received?
Overall Satisfaction with Service - DSFA & Revenue
Very Satisfied
Base: All who had any contact with the DSFA in the last 12 months (n=438)
Base: All who had any contact with the Revenue in the last 12 months (n=146)
Fairly SatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied Fairly DissatisfiedDon’t know Very Dissatisfied
86%satisfied
75%satisfied
18%dissatisfied
9%dissatisfied
While 75% of DSFA customers are satisfied with the level of service they received on
their most recent contact with the Department, 86% of Revenue customers are
satisfied. Similarly, dissatisfaction is significantly higher among DSFA customers
(18%), compared to Revenue customers (9%). Thus, the average experience of DSFA
customers is significantly less satisfactory than that of Revenue customers.
There are a number of possible explanations for the different levels of satisfaction
recorded by DSFA and Revenue customers which relate to the nature of contacts they
are likely to have with the Civil Service. The first possible explanation is the level of
contact customers have with individual Departments.
44
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
8
Top 3 Depts - Frequency of Contact (05-09)
Q. How frequently have you contacted those Departments in the last year? (ranked by highest respondent base)
35%
28%
27%
23%
41%
30%
32%
56%
69%
64% 19%
23%
29%
47%
37%
39%
45%
48%
45%
53%
13%
4%
6%
19%
14%
13%
19%
22%
21%
26%
Once 2-4 times 5+ times
2009
2009
2009
2008
2005
2008
2005
2008
Base: All Respondents who have been in contact with each Dept
Dept of Social & Family Affairs
Office of the Revenue
Commissioners
Dept of Foreign Affairs (incl. Passport office)
As displayed above, Revenue customers are significantly more likely to have had a
single contact with the Office, compared to DSFA customers who are significantly more
likely to have multiple contacts with the Department. In 2009, there are almost as many
DSFA customers who contacted the Department five or more times (26%) in the last 12
months as there are customers who contacted the Department once (27%). Only 13%
of Revenue customers had contact five or more times with the Office. This would
suggest that the processes involved in resolving contacts with the DSFA is
considerably longer, on average, than when dealing with Revenue. By way of
comparison, we can also see that 69% of respondents who had contact with the
Department of Foreign Affairs (including the Passport Office) in 2009 contacted the
Department only once. This might be a result of process improvements in passport
application and other systems in recent years.
In 2008 and 2009, the single most frequently identified reason for dissatisfaction with
service delivery was that the process was too slow or complex. As we have seen,
timeliness and speed of delivery is a consistent feature of the improvements required
by Civil Service customers across contact methods. However, the process involved for
certain services, such as renewing a passport, can be considerably more
straightforward than others, such as registering for social welfare services, and the
length of the process necessarily gives rise to greater potential for dissatisfaction.
The nature of many DSFA services is that customers typically make contact in person
by visiting local social welfare offices. As personal visits require travel to and from
45
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
Departments, as well as waiting time at the office, they will, all things being equal,
involve a greater investment of time than alternative contact methods for each single
contact a customer makes. The contrast in the distribution of contact methods used to
contact the DSFA and Revenue is displayed below.
15
Method of Most Recent Contact – DSFA & Revenue
41%
41%
12%
4%
2%
30%
61%
8%
21%
19%
3%
7%
50%
2009DSFARevenue
Q. Thinking about this most recent contact, did you mainly deal with the relevant Department or Office by telephone, in writing, by e-mail, via a website or in person?
By phone
In person
In writing
Via Internet
Through e-mail
Base: All who had any contact with a Govt Dept/Office in the last 12 months (n=992 in 2009, DSFA n=438, Revenue n=146 )
Overall, the proportion of Civil Service customers who made their most recent contact
by phone is the same as the proportion whose most recent contact was in person.
However, 61% of DSFA customers’ most recent contact was in person, compared to
21% of Revenue customers. 30% of DSFA customers’ most recent contact was by
phone, compared to 50% of Revenue customers. Because of the number of variables
involved in visiting Government offices, such as the physical environment, queuing
system, opening hours, and office location, contact in person is often a more complex
process than contact by phone or electronic means. Again, this may give rise to greater
potential for a dissatisfactory customer experience.
The DSFA customer experience is therefore more likely to involve multiple, ‘in person’
contacts with the Department whereas Revenue customers are more likely to have a
single contact by phone or electronic means. Across all services, regardless of contact
method, the challenge for the Civil Service is to reduce the complexity of service
delivery for users. For example, Revenue now delivers a number of its services to
personal and business customers through online interactive services.
However, this is only possible where such forms of service delivery are appropriate to
46
Irish Civil Service - Customer Satisfaction Survey
customers’ needs and requirements and, while the general public now view internet or
e-mail contact to be as convenient as personal contact, less than 1% of DSFA
customers made contact by e-mail or via Internet. DSFA customers are also more than
twice as likely as Revenue customers to consider either internet or e-mail contact to be
inconvenient. Thus, while electronic service delivery is an attractive model when
considering the relative efficiency of different service delivery methods, e-services are
not equally accessible to all customer cohorts.
7.2 Measuring Performance
Given the incredibly diverse nature of services provided by the Civil Service as a
whole, there is no equivalent organisation against which a direct and meaningful
comparison can be made, in terms of performance. Nonetheless, these customer
surveys provide a temporal point of comparison and the 2009 customer survey results
demonstrate consistency in the perceived quality of service delivery by the Civil Service
at an overall level, when compared with previous surveys. They also illustrate how
customer experiences (and requirements) differ in specific contexts and across contact
methods, depending on the nature of the services involved. This undermines
somewhat the usefulness of a single benchmark of performance for the Civil Service.
Just as the complexity of the customer experience differs from service to service, so
should the level of customer satisfaction, the “Frontier of Performance”, that any
individual service is expected to achieve. Some services, such as renewing a passport
or obtaining a tax clearance certificate, are simply more easily administered than others
and, from a user’s point of view, easier to consume. A deeper understanding of Civil
Service customer journeys will ensure that services provided by individual Departments
and Offices reflect the requirements and expectation of their customers, but could also
be used to develop appropriate targets for individual services.
Ultimately, the challenge for the Civil Service is to continue to deliver high-quality
services which are appropriate to the needs of each specific user.
47