3. THE GLASS STATE AND THE GLASS TRANSITION : THERMODYNAMIC and KINETIC ASPECTS

Post on 05-Jan-2016

54 views 4 download

Tags:

description

3. THE GLASS STATE AND THE GLASS TRANSITION : THERMODYNAMIC and KINETIC ASPECTS. Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Differential Thermal Analysis. Is the glass transition a true thermodynamic phase transition ?.  T g depends on the cooling rate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

3. THE GLASS STATE AND THE GLASS TRANSITION:THERMODYNAMIC and KINETIC ASPECTS

Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential Thermal Analysis

“The deepest and most interesting unsolved problem in solid state theory is probably the theory of the nature of the glass and the glass transition.”

[ P. W. Anderson, SCIENCE 267 (1995) pp. 1615-1616. ]

• Is the glass transition a true thermodynamic phase transition ?

Tg depends on the

cooling rate

Tg depends on the

thermal history

Ehrenfest relations

p

Tg

CTV

dP

dTdSdS

21

T

Tg

dP

dTdVdV

21

12

T

pT

TV

CR

Prigogine-Defay ratio

must be = 1 if it were a phase transition with a single order parameter

sub-Tg aging and annealing

Tanneal.

using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC, TMDSC…)

[J. M. Hutchinson, Thermochimica Acta 324 (1998) 165-174

using Differential Scanning Calorimetry

the fictive temperature Tf

B2O3

the fictive temperature Tf

80 85 90 95 100 105-3,5

-3,0

-2,5

-2,0

-1,5

-1,0

-0,5

0,0

0,5

Heating rate = 1,3 K/min.

Q* (coolin rate)0,04 K/min0,08 K/min0,42 K/min1,3 K/min4,5 K/min15 K/min

HC

on

fig (

J)

T (K)

Tf

93,994,294,695,896,497,2

Glass / SCL

Ethanol

80 85 90 95 100 105 110

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Glass phase

CP (

J/K

.mo

l)

T (K)

Glass / SCL

CP (J/K.mol)

43,242,6342,3641,8339,639,38

Tg (K)

97,8197,0596,8196,7897,0797,22

Q* (coolin rate)0,04 K/min0,08 K/min0,42 K/min1,3 K/min4,5 K/min15 K/min

heating rate = 1,3 K/min.

SCL phase

the fictive temperature Tf

phenomenological Tool-Narayanaswamy-Moynihan (TNM) approach

feq T

x

T

x

R

hA

1exp

*

[ Tool, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 29 (1946) 240.Narayanaswamy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54 (1971) 491.Moynihan et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59 (1976) 12. ]

curve fitting method:

[I. M. Hodge, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 169 (1994) 211]

THE KAUZMANN PARADOX

)(lnTdCSSmT

T

pF

EXCESS OF ENTROPY:

crystalglassliquid SSS /

0)( KTTSTK

W. Kauzmann, Chem. Rev. 43, 219 (1948)

THE KAUZMANN PARADOXNN

1.0

STRONG AND FRAGILE GLASS-FORMING LIQUIDS

0 1

Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher equation:

0

0expTT

TD

(D: strength)

gTTg TTm

)/(

log10fragility index m:

STRONG AND FRAGILE GLASS-FORMING LIQUIDS

C. A. Angell, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 102, 205 (1988)

[I. Chang and H. Sillescu]

Ecuación de Stokes-Einstein:

r

TkD B

6

[A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik 17, 549 (1905)]