6. Settlement of Shallow Footings CIV4249: Foundation Engineering Monash University CIV4249:...

Post on 15-Jan-2016

277 views 2 download

Tags:

transcript

6. Settlementof Shallow Footings

6. Settlementof Shallow Footings

CIV4249: Foundation Engineering

Monash University

CIV4249: Foundation Engineering

Monash University

Oedometer TestOedometer Test

• (change of) Height• Applied Load

• Void Ratio• Applied Stress

Particular Sample Measurements:

General Derived Relationship:

h

height vs time plotsheight vs time plots

ho

hei

gh

t

log time

typically take measurements at 15s, 30s,1m, 2m, 3m, 5m, 10m, 15m, 30m, 1h, 2h,3h, 6h, 12h, 24h, 36h, 48h, 60h ….etc.

elastic primaryconsolidation secondary

compression

typically repeat for 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1600 KPa

Void ratio = f(h)Void ratio = f(h)

RelativeVolume

SpecificGravity

1

e 1.00

2.65

1 + e 1.917

e = 0.8

h = 1.9 cmdia = 6.0 cmW = 103.0 g

Elastic SettlementElastic Settlement

• Instantaneous component

• Occurs prior to expulsion of water

• Undrained parameters

• Instantaneous component

• Expulsion of water cannot be separated

• Drained parameters• Not truly elastic

Clay Sand

By definition - fully reversible, no energy loss, instantaneous

Water flow is not fully reversible, results in energy loss, and time depends on permeability

Elastic parameters - clayElastic parameters - clay

Eu

• Soft clay• Firm clay• Stiff Clay• V stiff / hard clay

Eu/cu

• most clays

nu

• All clays

• 2000 - 5000 kPa• 5000 - 10000 kPa• 10000 - 25000 kPa• 25000 - 60000 kPa

• 200 - 300

• 0.5 (no vol. change)

Elastic parameters - sandElastic parameters - sand

Ed

• Loose sand• Medium sand• Dense sand• V dense sand

nd

• Loose sand• Dense sand

• 10000 - 17000 kPa• 17500 - 25000 kPa• 25000 - 50000 kPa• 50000 - 85000 kPa

• 0.1 to 0.3• 0.3 to 0.4

note volume change!

Elastic SettlementElastic Settlement

r = H s/E = H.ez

E

s

H

ez

Q

Generalized stressand strain field

E

r = ez .dz0

¥

Distribution of StressDistribution of Stress

r

R z

Q

sz

sq

sr

• Boussinesq solution

e.g. sz = Q Is z2

Is = 3 1 2p [1+(r/z)2]5/2

Is is stress influence factor

y

Uniformly loaded circular areaUniformly loaded circular area

dq

dr

r

z

load, q

sz

a

By integration of Boussinesqsolution over complete area:

sz = q [1- 1 ] = q.Is [1+(a/z)2]3/2

Stresses under rectangular area

Stresses under rectangular area

• Solution after Newmark for stresses under the corner of a uniformly loaded flexible rectangular area:

• Define m = B/z and n = L/z• Solution by charts or

numerically• sz = q.Is

Is = 1 2mn(m2+n2+1)1/2 . m2+n2+2 m2+n2-m2n2+1 4p m2+n2+1

+ tan-12mn(m2+n2+1)1/2

m2+n2-m2n2+1

z

sz

B

L

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

L/B = 1

L/B = 2

L/B = 10

Total stress changeTotal stress change

Is

z/B

Computation of settlementComputation of settlement

1. Determine vertical strains:

r

R z

Q

sz

sq

sr

y

2. Integrate strains:

ez = 1 [sz - n ( sr + sq )] Eez = Q .(1+n).cos3 .y (3cos2y-2n) 2pz2E

r = ez .dz0

¥

r = Q (1-n2 ) prE

ߥ

â¥

Settlement of a circular areaSettlement of a circular area

dq

dr

r

z

load, q

sz

a

Centre :

Edge :

r = 4q(1-n2).a

pE

r = 2q(1-n2).a

E

Settlement at the corner of a flexible rectangular area

Settlement at the corner of a flexible rectangular area

z

sz

B

L

Schleicher’s solution

r = q.B1 - n2

EIr

Ir = m ln + ln 1p

1+ m2 + 1

mm+ m2 + 1

m = L/B

nz

z

z= q.I

x

Area coveredwith uniformnormal load, q

mzy z

Note: m and n are interchangeable

m = ocm = 3.0m = 2.5

m = 2.0m = 1.8

m = 1.6m = 1.4 m = 1.2

m = 1.0

m = 0.9

m = 0.8

m = 0.7

m = 0.6

m = 0.5

m = 0.4

m = 0.3

m = 0.2

m = 0.1

m = 0.000.01 2 345 0.1 2 43 5 1.0 2 3 45 10

0.26

0.24

0.22

0.20

0.18

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

I

VERTICAL STRESS BELOW A CORNEROF A UNIFORMLY LOADED FLEXIBLE

RECTANGULAR AREA.

Settlement at the centre of a flexible rectangular area

Settlement at the centre of a flexible rectangular area

B

L

B/2

L/2

rcentre = 4q.B 2

1 - n2

EIr Superposition for any

other point under the footing

Settlement under a finite layer - Steinbrenner method

Settlement under a finite layer - Steinbrenner method

q

H

B

E

“Rigid”

X

Y

rcorner = q.B1 - n2

EIr Ir = F1 + F2

1-n

1-2n

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

2

4

6

8

10

L/B = 1

L/B = 2

L/B = 5

L/B = 10

L/B = oo

L/B = 1

L/B = 2

L/B = 5

L/B = 10

L/B = oo

F1

Values of F ( ) and F ( )1 2

Dep

th f

acto

r d

= H

/B

Influence values for settlement beneath the corner of a uniformly loadedrectangle on an elastic layer (Depth D) overlying a rigid base

F2

Superposition using Steinbrenner methodSuperposition using Steinbrenner method

B

L

Multi-layer systemsMulti-layer systemsq

H1

BE1

“Rigid”

H2E2

r = r(H1,E1) + r(H1+H2,E2) - r(H1,E2)

• A phenomenon which occurs in both sands and clays

• Can only be isolated as a separate phenomenon in clays

• Expulsion of water from soils accompanied by increase in effective stress and strength

• Amount can be reasonably estimated in lab, but rate is often poorly estimated in lab

• Only partially recoverable

Primary ConsolidationPrimary Consolidation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

L/B = 1

L/B = 2

L/B = 10

Total stress changeTotal stress change

Is

z/B

Pore pressure and effective stress changes

Pore pressure and effective stress changes

¢s i

¢s f

Ds = Du + Ds¢

At t = 0 : Ds = DuAt t = ¥ : Ds = Ds¢

Stress non-linearityStress non-linearity

qnet

z

Soil non-linearitySoil non-linearity

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

10 100 1000

Clay

Cr

Ccp¢c¢s i ¢s f

e

sv

r = S log + log Cr H

1+eo

Cc H

1+ec

p¢c

¢s i

¢s f

p¢c

Coeff volume compressibilityCoeff volume compressibility

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Clay

(1+eo).mv

e

sv

r = Smv.Ds¢.DH

Rate of ConsolidationRate of Consolidation

Flowh = H Flowh = H / 2

T = cv ti / H2

U = 90% : T = 0.848

Coefficient of ConsolidationCoefficient of Consolidation

• Coefficient of consolidation, cv (m2/yr)

• Notoriously underestimated from laboratory tests

• Determine time required for (90% of) primary consolidation

• Why?

Secondary CompressionSecondary Compression

• Creep phenomenon• No pore pressure change• Commences at completion of primary

consolidation

• ca/Cc » 0.05

ca = De

log (t2 / t1)r = log (t2/t1)

caH

(1+ep)

Flexible vs RigidFlexible vs Rigid

stressstres

sdeflectiondeflection

F F

rcentre 0.8 rcentre RF = 0.8RF = 0.8

Depth CorrectionDepth Correction

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 2.5 5 7.5 10z/B

Dep

th F

acto

r Bz

Total SettlementTotal Settlement

rtot = RF x DF ( relas + rpr.con + rsec )

Field Settlement for Clays(Bjerrum, 1962)

Field Settlement for Clays(Bjerrum, 1962)

Pore - pressure coefficient

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.20 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Settle

men

t co

effici

ent

Values on curves areDB

0.25

0.25

4

4

1.0

1.00.5

0.5

Over-consolidatedNormally

consolidated

Verysensitive

clays

CircleStrip

D

B

Clay layer

Differential SettlementsDifferential Settlements

Guiding values• Isolated foundations on clay < 65 mm• Isolated foundations on sand <40 mm

Structural damage to buildings 1/150

(Considerable cracking in brick and panel walls)

For the above max settlement values

flexible structure <1/300

rigid structure <1/500

Settlement in Sand via CPT Results (Schmertmann, 1970)Settlement in Sand via CPT

Results (Schmertmann, 1970)

yearsin is

1.0log2.01

5.01

102

01

121

t

tC

C

zE

ICC

nlayer

layer

z