Post on 14-Apr-2018
transcript
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 1/26
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 377
t
64-Slice
Computed Tomography Systems
Computed tomography systems offering 64 slices are highly popular
because of their fast acquisition time. Any of the four systems cov-
ered in this article is likely to meet your basic CT needs. But each of-fers differing features and capabilities—for example, they’re not all
equally effective at cardiac imaging. Our Evaluation will help you de-cide which product is best for your facility.
We tested and rated the following products:
u GE LightSpeed VCT
u Philips Brilliance 64
u Siemens Sensation 64
u Toshiba Aquilion 64 w
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 2/26
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 3/26
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 379
Evaluation at a Glance: 64-Slice CT Systems
GE LightSpeed VCT Philips Brilliance 64 Siemens Sensation 64 Toshiba Aquilion 64
PRODUCT RATING
butsomewhat lessdesirable
than theother systems
IMAGE QUALITY Good Good Good ✪ Excellent
Noise characteristics Good Good Good Good
Slice thickness and
spatial resolution Good Good ✪ Excellent—Ultrahigh-
resolution mode is avail-able (0.3 mm slices)
✪ Excellent—Narrow-
est slices
Uniformity ✪ Excellent intersliceuniformity
Good ✪ Excellent—Best uni-formity performance
✪ Excellent—Goodscores
Temporal resolution ✪ Excellent—Best scoresoverall
✪ Excellent—Highscoresfor phantom images
Good ✪ Excellent—Bestscoresfor narrowest slices
Artifacts Good Good Good Good
DOSE MANAGEMENT ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent
Dose ✪ Excellent—CardiacSnapShot Pulse reducesdose by 80%; “Color Cod-ing Kids” used for pediatric
doses; 3 filters automati-cally match image size
✪ Excellent—CardiacStep & Shoot image ac-quisition reduces dose
✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent—Auto-matic selection of filtersbased on image size
Dose modulation ✪ Excellent—Dose is
recorded for all exams asDICOM image
✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent—Uses non-
linear exposure model solarger patients receiveless dose
✪ Excellent—Dose is
recorded within DICOMdata
WORKFLOW
INTEGRATION
✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent Good Good
Clinical experience ✪ Excellent—High-powerx-ray source for obese pa-
tients; descriptive namesfor reconstruction filters
✪ Excellent—Smallfocal spot (high resolu-
tion) available at high mAsettings
Good Good
Image acquisition
performance Good ✪ Excellent—Wide-
coverage stroke detection
and real-time imagedisplay
Good Good
Postprocessing ✪ Excellent—Wide range
of applications, includingwide-coverage stroke de-tection and computer-
assisted reading
✪ Excellent—Remote
users can reprocess im-ages; full range of appli-cations, including ability to
export data to cath lab
✪ Excellent—Automated
postprocessingworkflow;wide range of clinical appli-cations, including true CAD
for lung noduledetection
✪ Excellent—Vitrea
workstation includes ac-cess to lung noduleCAD software
Ease of use Good Good ✪ Excellent—Intelligenthelp for setting parameters
✪ Excellent—Severalfeatures make imageacquisition more consis-
tent regardless of userexperience
Connectivity Good Good Good Good
SERVICE AND
SUPPORT
Good Good Good Good
User feedback ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent ✪ Excellent
Training ✪ Excellent—Remoteusers can control acquisi-
tion parameters
Good ✪ Excellent—Remoteservice and access to ap-
plications specialists
✪ Excellent
Reliability and
maintenance Good Good Good Good
Planning Good ✪ Excellent—Unique in-stallation planningand ar-chitectural services help
reduce patient anxiety
Good Good
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 4/26
saved with the images. In addition, GE’s cardiac dose-sav-
ing feature, Cardiac SnapShot Pulse, demonstrated an 80%
dose saving during our tests, although it has limitations—
such as only being usable for heart rates up to 65 bpm and
producing an image of only one part of the cardiac phase.Extended-coverage brain perfusion imaging is available.
For advanced 3-D processing, GE depends on the Advan-
tage Workstation, which has some unique applications
(e.g., stent planning, pacemaker planning, body perfusion
calculation, colonography, densitometry). For large pa-
tients, the standard configuration has the most powerful
specified x-ray generator. GE also provides a wide range
of training and business-optimization services.
Philips Medical Systems Brilliance 64
u Provides high-quality images and includes some useful
and unique applications, such as remote access to rawdata and large-coverage stroke detection.
The Brilliance 64 provides consistent, high-quality images
in both cardiac and noncardiac applications. Its Extended
Brilliance Workspace feature enables multiple users to ac-
cess and reconstruct raw data remotely, a unique capability
that is likely to benefit radiologists who are not physically
close to the scanner. In departments with Philips cardiol-
ogy imaging equipment, the Brilliance can be closely inte-
grated with Philips’s TrueView technology, which allows
CT cardiac images to be displayed in the cath lab. Philips
offers a function called Step & Shoot that provides ad-
vanced dose saving in cardiac CT, although it has limita-
tions—for example, it cannot be used with higher heart
rates and produces an image of only one part of the cardiac
phase. In stroke imaging, the Jog Mode has been used for
a few years to provide reliable and accurate brain perfu-
sion images.
For imaging obese patients, Philips has an optional ta-
ble with a weight limit of 295 kg (650 lb), which is thehighest capacity available, and the x-ray tube can be used
at maximum power on the small focal spot for short peri-
ods, so high-resolution imaging is possible with larger pa-
tients. In addition, Philips offers good tube warranty terms
and upgrade options, improving the predictability of the
overall cost of ownership. And the company provides all
the information required for installation planning and of-
fers architectural design features—including lighting—
designed to reduce patient anxiety.
LESS DESIRABLE ACCEPTABLE PRODUCT
The remaining system is also rated Acceptable but is not
quite as desirable as the others because its cardiac image
quality—a vital factor when choosing a 64-slice system—
doesn’t quite measure up to that of the other systems.
Siemens Medical Solutions Sensation 64
u Offers excellent performance for noncardiac applica-
tions, including computer-aided detection.
The Sensation 64 is a good choice for noncardiac applica-
tions, as well as for facilities standardizing on the Siemens
multimodality platform (Syngo) for workflow and eco-
nomic considerations. It provides high-quality images witha straightforward user interface. It offers the highest spa-
tial resolution and narrowest slice thickness of the systems
we evaluated; this is useful in some limited applications,
such as inner-ear exams. Also, the image uniformity is ex-
ceptional, and the default dose settings are the lowest of
the systems we tested. However, a disadvantage is the sys-
tem’s narrower coverage, which is only half of that
provided in other systems.
380 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
A Comment on Slices
Why Test 64?
Each supplier covered in this Evaluation offers a
range of systems, providing varying numbers of
slices. In our April 2007 Guidance Article “Com-
puted Tomography—How Many Ways Should You
Slice It?” we concluded that 16-slice systems are ad-
equate for most applications. So why did we concen-
trate on 64-slice products for this Evaluation?
One reason is that 64-slice systems represent the
latest available technology* and are heavily pro-
moted by suppliers, so there is considerable pressure
on facilities to offer them. Another is that in most
cases, suppliers’ 16- and 64-slice systems have
many similarities. This means that facilities looking
at 16-slice systems can use our findings to judge
many of those products’ capabilities, particularly in
areas such as x-ray detection, image reconstruction,and applications software. (However, our actual
product ratings apply only to the specific 64-slice
systems we tested.) ◆
* Systems offering 256 slices are in the late stages of development
butare still several months from being commercially available. We
profiled this technology in our November2007 Technology Timeline
article, “256-Slice Wide-Detector Computed Tomography.”
(continued from page 378)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 5/26
The Syngo multimodality platform has now been used
for a number of years and has proved popular. The image
display workstation uses the same database as the acquisi-
tion computer, so there are no data transfer penalties, and
data can be reprocessed without interfering with acquisi-
tion. Users can access some of the 3-D image visualization
tools on remote computers over the Internet. Siemens is
the only CT manufacturer to offer computer-aided detec-
tion for lung nodules. Users of Siemens cardiology imag-
ing equipment can display CT cardiac images within the
cath lab.
Siemens also offers some potentially useful service
and monitoring tools. These depend on a CT system being
electronically accessible by Siemens (via a virtual private
network [VPN], usually through a facility’s firewall).
Siemens provides proactive system monitoring, as well as
good tube warranty coverage and unique utilization and
management data.
Desirable Features and HowWe Tested For Them
Multislice CT is used for a wide variety of diagnostic and
screening exams. Not only must the image quality be ade-
quate with minimum x-ray dose, but the systems must al-
low efficient patient throughput and have high reliability.
Our specific tests are listed on this page. In broad outline,
they consisted of the following:
Image Quality
Image quality determines diagnostic accuracy. You need a
scanner that offers the highest-quality images without sig-
nificantly increasing dose. We used standard CT image
quality measurement techniques (noise, uniformity, slice
thickness, spatial resolution, and low-contrast detectability)
to assess the image quality across the full range of clini-
cally relevant imaging parameters. We used either our own
phantom or industry-standard phantoms to ensure compa-rability of the results.
Our measurement methods are widely used, and most
are objective; for example, our criteria are based on indus-
try standards such as the International Electrotechnical
Commission’s IEC 61223-3-5 (Acceptance Tests—Imag-
ing Performance of Computed Tomography X-Ray
Equipment). However, other measurements, such as low-
contrast detectability, are necessarily subjective; in such
cases, all images were anonymized to ensure an unbiased
result.
A particularly important feature of 64-slice CT systems
is the ability to acquire clear images of coronary arteries in
the beating heart. To test this, we designed and built a dy-
namic test phantom that emulated the motion of the coro-nary arteries at various heart rates. The phantom can be
connected to the ECG input of a CT system so that it can
be imaged in exactly the same way that a patient would be.
For more details, see the discussion of ECRI Institute’s
cardiac phantom, below.
Dose Management
Suppliers have made considerable efforts to reduce the
dose of CT scans, in particular controlling the dose based
on the patient’s size. Using phantoms, we evaluated the ef-
fectiveness of dose-reduction technologies and the effect
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 381
Tests Performed
Image Quality
■ Noise Characteristics
■ Slice Thickness and Spatial Resolution
■ Uniformity
■ Temporal Resolution
■
Artifacts
Dose Management
■ Dose
■ Dose Modulation
Workflow Integration
■ Clinical Experience
■ Image Acquisition Performance
■ Postprocessing
■ Ease of Use
■ Connectivity
Service and Support
■ User Feedback
■ Training
■ Reliability and Maintenance
■ Planning ◆
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 6/26
382 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
on dose when using different beam collimations. We also
looked at dose-control mechanisms for pediatric patients.
Workflow Integration
CT systems must reliably and consistently perform many
different scans on a wide range of patients, and the resulting
data must be processed and interpreted. Efficient workflow
requires adequate equipment and good integration with
other systems.
We ascertained how well systems fit into the workflow
by exploring the application tools available, surveying us-
ers, and examining the compliance to relevant standards
applicable to CT (e.g., DICOM, IHE).
Service and Support
CT systems are complex and will require both routine and
emergency service, making good manufacturer servicingimportant. We surveyed users regarding their experiences
with the manufacturers. In addition, we looked at each
manufacturer’s policies regarding service, particularly
x-ray tube reliability and warranty options.
ECRI Institute’sCardiac Phantom
To assess the dynamic image quality of the evaluated sys-
tems, we designed and built a dynamic phantom that con-
tained three contrast-filled catheters (diameters 1.3 mm,
1.9 mm, and 2.5 mm). The catheters were moved by a
microprocessor-controlled mechanism to simulate cardiac
motion at various heart rates (65 bpm, 75 bpm, 85 bpm,
and irregular). The phantom had an ECG output that con-
nected to a CT scanner in the same way that a patient
would be. Images were acquired and reconstructed using
the manufacturers’ recommended protocols.
The images from our phantom (about 200 for eachheart rate) were processed using a maximum intensity pro-
jection to create composites, some of which can be found
in the product profiles for the individual systems. The im-
ages of the catheters were assessed using the following
scale:
5. Clear and sharp throughout
4. Slight blurring and irregularities
3. Majority of sectors usable
2. Minority of sectors usable
1. Unusable
Schematic of our cardiac phantom, showing mechan-
ical motion.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 7/26
Evaluation Findings
Overall PerformanceThe evaluated systems are all able to consistently provide
images of suitable quality. All of the users we interviewed
said that they would choose the same system again.* Even
customers who reported some problems answered posi-
tively. At the same time, we found that each manufacturer
had some unique features and technologies, which we de-
tail in this and the following sections.
IMAGE QUALITY
General findings. The tables on pages 384 through 386
summarize our image quality measurements. As our re-
sults show, the image quality provided by all the systems
is within acceptable limits. However, there are some dif-
ferences among the systems that are discussed in the indi-
vidual product profiles.
Dynamic imaging. Perhaps the hardest aspect of modern
CT scanning to evaluate objectively is the quality of an
image captured from a beating heart. Our assessment using
simulated coronary arteries showed clear differences be-
tween the systems (see “ECRI Institute’s Cardiac Phan-
tom” on page 382), particularly at higher and irregular
heart rates: GE’s and Toshiba’s images were clear and
sharp, the other systems’ slightly less so. The images also
demonstrated that manufacturers use significantly differentreprocessing parameters (e.g., reconstruction filters, slice
width). It is possible that these will affect the accuracy of
the cardiac images. Therefore, we believe that more re-
search into those factors is needed.
DOSE MANAGEMENT
Dose modulation based on information retrieved from
scout views is now standard on CT systems. While there
are subtle differences between the approaches used, the
techniques achieve comparable dose savings of 40% to
60%. Absolute dose savings will depend not only on the
technology, but also on how the user configures and usesthe tools provided.
Dose control is a major issue in cardiac imaging. ECG
gating of the x-ray exposure—that is, using the ECG sig-
nal to trigger the beginning and end of a scan—is now
standard, and each manufacturer achieves dose reductions
between 13% and 20%, which represent comparable effec-
tiveness. Even so, cardiac CT remains a high-dose exam.GE, Philips, and Siemens have techniques using axial ac-
quisition that can reduce the dose by 80%. However, there
are limitations to these techniques, and other more signifi-
cant technological innovations may prove to be more ef-
fective at reducing dose without limiting the diagnostic
information—for example, dual-source CT from Siemens
and 256-slice CT from Toshiba. ECRI Institute believes
that dose is becoming a key decision issue when choosing
CT systems for cardiac imaging. It is vital that users
understand the benefits and limitations of any new
techniques being proposed.
WORKFLOW INTEGRATION
It is clear from our study that all the manufacturers have
made considerable efforts to develop intuitive user inter-
faces; all of them define clear steps through which the user
progresses. However, differences emerge when consider-
ing how image acquisition and image reconstruction
coexist. Some manufacturers put scan planning and recon-
struction into one console, while others use separate
consoles. One console is sufficient if it is unlikely that
physicians will ask for additional reconstructions and if
workspace is limited. But in situations with more demand-ing physicians who are likely to request additional pro-
cessing, two separate workstations are preferred so that
scanning is not interrupted. One manufacturer, Philips, has
introduced technology that enables any user to access raw
data remotely; this technology enables radiologists to re-
process images without interrupting workflow and to do so
from different locations.
The huge amount of data produced by CT means that
3-D processing is now indispensable. Picture archiving
and communication system (PACS) workstations are gen-
erally not adequate for this purpose, but few facilities can
afford to purchase sufficient 3-D workstations to handle
their workloads. So the trend today is to use thin-client
technology so that users can access advanced 3-D func-
tionality from personal computers or PACS workstations.
Different pricing models are used for licensing the number
of concurrent users, so overall costs will be variable.
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 383
* Note that we did not restrict our user survey to names provided by the
manufacturers. (continued on page 386)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 8/26
384 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Table 1. Noise Comparison
Spatial frequency,line pairs/cm Noise, %
GE Philips Siemens Toshiba
3 (standard) 0.36 0.38 0.35 NA
5 (chest) 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.9
6 (lung) 2.3 2.3 2.5 3.2
9 (bone) 4.2 4.2 4.7 10.6
Noise limits the visibility of details, so it is widely used as an indicator of image quality—the lower the
noise, the better the image quality. However, noise is strongly affected by the sharpness of the image,
which is determined by the reconstruction kernel. In fact, there is a linear relationship between them.
Therefore, to compare systems, we can interpolate the noise produced by each at specific spatial fre-
quencies. These values show comparable performance for three of the systems; the exception is
Toshiba. In soft-tissue imaging, Toshiba uses a higher spatial resolution and has lower noise. But in bone
imaging (which is a high-resolution technique), Toshiba has higher noise. Keep in mind, however, thatminimizing noise is more important during soft-tissue imaging than during high-resolution imaging.
In addition to the standard reconstruction kernels, manufacturers also include high-resolution kernels
with reduced noise levels, sometimes referred to as adaptive filters. Our results confirm that adaptive fil-
ters allow the dose to be reduced in high-resolution imaging. The main disadvantage with these filters is
that they require a slightly longer reprocessing time.
Table 2. Uniformity Comparison
Results in italics represent the best uniformity. Numbers in parentheses indicate the slice thickness used.
GE Philips Siemens Toshiba
Intraslice axial uniformity, HU 3.7 (5 mm) 3.6 (5 mm) 0.3 (4.8 mm) 0.4 (8 mm)
Interslice axial uniformity, HU
Broad slices 1.0 (5 mm) 3.8 (5 mm) 0.8 (4.8 mm) 0.83 (8 mm)
Narrow slices 2.68 (0.625 mm) 8 (0.6 mm) 2.25 (1 mm) 1.53 (0.5 mm)
Interslice uniformity for 5 mm
spiral slices, HU
1.0 1.0 0.3 1.1
In CT images, voxel values are directly related to the attenuation characteristics of the subject. The voxel
values in a uniform phantom image should be uniform regardless of the position of the phantom. Unifor-
mity depends on good calibration for all the detectors. Low values indicate good uniformity.
For all four systems, the measurements were within acceptable limits. Overall, the Siemens and
Toshiba results demonstrated better performance.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 9/26
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 385
Table 3. Sharpness Comparison
Higher values indicate sharper images. Results in italics represent the best performance.
GE Philips Siemens Toshiba
Soft-tissue imaging Standard kernel UB kernel B31s kernel FC22 kernel
50% 3.6 lp/cm 3.0 lp/cm 3.3 lp/cm 4.4 lp/cm
10% 6.1 lp/cm 5.4 lp/cm 6.7 lp/cm 8.3 lp/cm
2% 7.5 lp/cm 7.0 lp/cm 8.6 lp/cm 11.0 lp/cm
Lung imaging Lung kernel E kernel B70s kernel FC50 kernel
50% 5.7 lp/cm 4.9 lp/cm 6.5 lp/cm 5.6 lp/cm
10% 9.2 lp/cm 9.7 lp/cm 10.8 lp/cm 9.5 lp/cm
2% 10.5 lp/cm 13.6 lp/cm 9.5 lp/cm 11.5 lp/cm
Bone imaging Edge kernel D kernel B75h kernel FC80 kernel
50% 8.8 lp/cm 5.8 lp/cm 7.4 lp/cm 8.6 lp/cm
10% 14.4 lp/cm 10.4 lp/cm 12.5 lp/cm 14.2 lp/cm
2% 16.4 lp/cm 13.0 lp/cm 14.8 lp/cm 16.6 lp/cm
The sharpness of any imaging device can be measured using the modulation transfer function (MTF). Put
simply, the MTF is a plot of contrast against spatial resolution. In general, MTF decreases with spatial
resolution—in other words, fine detail (high spatial resolution) is more difficult to see. CT manufacturers
typically report the spatial frequencies at specific points along the MTF curve for comparison (e.g., 50%,
10%, and 2%). The 10% values are probably the most indicative of the image sharpness. However, the
MTF is dependent on the reconstruction kernel. This table reports the spatial frequency, in l ine pairs
(lp)/cm for specific points on the MTF response for three kernels for each manufacturer.
Table 4. Nominal versus Measured Slice Thickness
Results in italics indicate closest agreement between nominal and measured values.
GE Philips Siemens Toshiba
Nominal, mm 0.625 0.625 0.6 0.5
FWHM 0.72 0.83 0.69 0.60
FWTM 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.0
Nominal, mm 5 5 5 5
FWHM 5.3 5.0 5.1 5.0 FWTM 8.2 8.6 8.0 5.7
The thickness of helical slices is measured by assessing a profile of a thin object through multiple slices.
The full width half maximum (FWHM) of the profile defines slice thickness and should match the set value,
while the full width tenth maximum (FWTM) shows the spread of the slice profile—a narrower spread is
preferred. Toshiba images show smaller spreads than those of the other systems.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 10/26
The range of clinical applications available on different
suppliers’ 3-D workstations is broadly similar. The main
differences can be found in the quantitative and automated
tools they provide, such as computer-aided detection and
computer-assisted reading. It is important to keep in mindthat buyers are not limited to choosing a 3-D workstation
from the same manufacturer as the CT system, so they
should carefully consider their options and what is best for
their specific situation.
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
All the manufacturers have made considerable efforts to
provide installation, training, and maintenance services to
their customers. For example, they all have training
schools and normally include training for two hospital cli-
nicians with the purchase of new equipment. In addition,the companies’ applications specialists will spend some
time on-site after installation.
The users we surveyed were satisfied with the overall
level of service they received. However, one common com-
plaint with CT is the time involved in waiting for replace-
ment parts. This is unavoidable to some extent, since the
high cost of most parts means that it is not feasible to main-
tain spare-parts inventories within healthcare facilities.
Instead, manufacturers maintain distributed parts depots,
which can entail a longer delivery time. However, facili-
ties that allow manufacturers to remotely troubleshoot
their CT systems should benefit from earlier parts
delivery.
The most significant service issue with CT is the x-raytube life. A replacement tube can cost $200,000. There is
no standard method used to determine tube use, so com-
paring manufacturers’ warranties can be challenging. Our
calculations showed a wide variation in warranted tube life
from 120,000 to 250,000 scan seconds. Also, our survey
showed that x-ray tube life span tends to be random: Some
tubes lasted four months, while identical tubes lasted two
years. Based on our pooled data, users should budget to re -
place their tubes at least once per year. However, our sur-
vey found that one manufacturer, Toshiba, showed
consistently more reliable x-ray longevity, with most cus-
tomers still using their first tube after more than a year of operation.
For a fee, all the manufacturers will train hospital or
third-party service technicians in the same way as their
own technicians; most also require substantial additional
annual licensing fees to allow these technicians to service
their equipment. The bottom line is that, for facilities
wanting to service their own equipment, the full costs
must be considered.
386 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Table 5. Low-Contrast Detectability
Results in italics represent best performance.
GE Standardkernel
Philips UBkernel
Siemens B31skernel
Toshiba FC13kernel
Dose CTDIvol, mGy* 53 41 43 35
Minimum visible
diameter, mm
At 1% contrast 2 2 2 2
At 0.5% contrast 2 3 3 2
At 0.3% contrast 3 5 4 2
* Dose calculated using the head phantom CTDIw values and mAs.
The detectability of low-contrast objects of various sizes is often used to visually confirm the other mea-
surements. In CT, the minimum visible diameter is reported at three contrasts. A smaller diameter indicates
better image quality. However, manufacturers differ in how dose is determined, so comparing systems re-
quires close analysis of specifications. The results for the evaluated systems are comparable; Toshiba
shows the best performance overall.
(continued from page 383)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 11/26
About the Product Profiles
Starting on the next page, we describe each evaluated
product and note the test results that contributed to our rat-
ings. We present only those results from our testing that
we determined to be significant; we don’t discuss results
for tests in which a unit simply met our criteria or had noremarkable features. However, for all tests or test catego-
ries, we present an ECRI Institute judgment of the unit’s
performance according to the following scheme:
■ Excellent. The system possesses a feature or performs
at a level that would likely be considered favorable dur-
ing the selection process.
■ Good. The system performs satisfactorily. In general,
any advantages of the system balance or outweigh any
disadvantages.
■ Fair. The system either does not perform satisfactorily
or has a noteworthy deficiency or limitation. However,
the failure, deficiency, or limitation is not likely to (1)
cause an adverse clinical outcome, (2) significantly af-
fect the overall performance of the system, or (3) place
an excessive burden on those who purchase, use, or
service the system.
■ Poor. The system does not perform satisfactorily, and
its deficiencies or limitations are likely to (1) adversely
affect the clinical outcome, (2) significantly affect the
overall performance of the system, or (3) place an ex-
cessive burden on those who purchase, use, or service
the system.
Note that, in future updates of this study, our judgments
may change as we obtain new information.
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 387
Health Devices Evaluations rate products based on their clinical
and technical acceptability and desirability. Ratings are based on
standard commercial products. Suppliers often modify theirprod-
ucts in response to our findings, sometimes before we publishour Evaluations. If the modified product is not available in time for
us to verify the significance of the change, we may include a
statement of thesupplier’s intentions. In future issuesof Health
Devices, we mayupdate the information provided for theevalu-
ated products and may revise our ratings.
We recommend that you use our ratings as a guide for se-
lecting the best products for your healthcare facility. Actual
purchasing decisions should be based on a thorough under-
standing of the article, as well as on your specific clinical
applications, users’ opinions, standardization policies, direct
experience with the supplier, and price.
Ratings Category: Acceptable for Use
The product meets all major performance
and safety criteria. It has no serious shortcomings and offers
significant advantages over other alternatives.
The product meets all major performance
and safety criteria and has no serious shortcomings.
The product does what it is intended to
do, but not at the desired level of performance, or it has sig-
nificant disadvantages compared with other alternatives. For
example, it may be more difficult to use or clean, or it may be
less suitable for a specific application. A product that we rate
Not Recommended is safe to use and does not have to be
withdrawn from service. However, we recommend against
purchasing the product unless overriding considerations
warrant it.
Ratings Category: Unacceptable
The product fails to meet significant criteria
for performance or poses significant safety risks. A healthcare
facility that does not own such a product should not purchase
it. If you have a product that we have rated Unacceptable, re-
view the disadvantages of continuing to use it, and plan to
replace it. If you decide to purchase or continue to use the
product, carefully document the basis for your actions.
Conditional Ratings
Occasionally, our rating for a product depends on whether a
healthcare facility is willing and able to take corrective mea-
sures to overcome a basic performance or safety shortcoming.
Corrective measures range from special training (e.g., stress-
ing the importance of certain operating instructions) to order-
ing an upgrade or modifying a product. If the facility meets the
conditions stated, the product is rated in the category speci-
fied—that is, Preferred, Acceptable, or Not Recommended.
However, if the facility does not or cannot meet the conditions,
the product is Unacceptable.
Health Devices Ratings System
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 12/26
GE Healthcare LightSpeed VCT
Supplier. GE Healthcare [439946], Waukesha, Wisconsin
(USA); +1 (800) 643-6439, +1 (262) 544-3011; www.
gehealthcare.com
Product availability. Introduced in 2005, this product is
marketed worldwide.
The system we tested. We performed our testing on a
LightSpeed VCT with software release 06MW29.7 and
07MW18.4. The system was located in the manufacturer’s
testing and manufacturing facility.
Product DescriptionThe LightSpeed VCT family of CT systems includes sys-
tems with either 32 or 64 slices. In addition, the 16-slice or
4-slice LightSpeed RT and Xtra wide-bore (80 cm) config-
urations are available for oncology and general radiology
applications (e.g., trauma, bariatrics). GE has recently in-
troduced the BrightSpeed family of systems, which are
available with 4 to 16 slices and have a more compact gan-
try so they can be installed in smaller rooms.
The standard scanner configuration includes a dual-
monitor acquisition console to control scanning and im-
age reconstruction. A majority of clinical applications
can be accessed from the console. However, in most sce-
narios a specialized 3-D platform is more appropriate.
GE uses the Advantage Workstation (AW), which can bedirectly connected to GE CT scanners. In addition, the
AW RemoteAccess option allows users to remotely ac-
cess and use an AW.
Significant Test Results
Image quality—Good
Noise characteristics. Good—No significant findings to
report.
Slice thickness and spatial resolution. Good—No sig-
nificant findings to report.Uniformity. Excellent—The uniformity across a 250 mm
diameter phantom was within 3.7 HU, which is within our
criterion of 5 HU. The uniformity between contiguous ax-
ial slices was 1 HU for 5 mm slices and less than 3 HU for
0.625 mm slices. These values are well within our criteria.
Temporal resolution. Excellent—When using our dy-
namic cardiac phantom, the scores (5 = clear and sharp to
1 = unusable) for the 1.3 mm simulated catheter were 5 at
65 bpm, 4 at 75 bpm, 4 at 85 bpm, and 4 for the irregular
heart rate. The larger catheters were easily visible regard-
less of heart rate. (Some of the phantom images are shown
on the next page.)
Artifacts. Good—No significant findings to report.
Dose management—Excellent
Dose. Excellent—We were able to test a feature that
GE recently introduced commercially, Cardiac SnapShot
Pulse. We found that this feature reduced the dose length
product to 102 mGy ● cm compared to 561 mGy ● cm for
an ECG-modulated scan, which is an 80% reduction in
dose. What’s more, the breathhold time was reduced from8 seconds to less than 5 seconds. The technique is limited
to heart rates no greater than 65 bpm, so beta blockers are
normally needed to reduce the heart rate. We interviewed an
early user of this technology to determine the drawbacks.
The main drawback is that only one phase of cardiac data
is acquired. Therefore, the images can only be used to
determine the patency of the coronaries and cannot be
used for functional measurements. Also, the quality of the
388 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Acceptable. The GE LightSpeed VCT offers high-quality
imaging and is very easy to use.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 13/26
images produced by the first versions of this technique is
susceptible to variations in heart rate. GE informed us that
the full commercial version will be modified to better cope
with varying heart rates. In our opinion, this technique is a
significant step forward in the reduction of dose when CT
is being used to diagnose coronary disease.
Dose in pediatric body imaging is set using the Broselow-
Luten “Color Coding Kids” system, which is commonly
used in emergency rooms to determine appropriate drugdoses. The system is applicable for weights up to 36 kg
(80 lb). In head imaging, three age ranges are used.
The system uses three bow-tie filters to shape the x-ray
beam before it is incident on the patient. The bow-tie filter
is automatically selected to match the field of view. These
filters help optimize the dose to the clinical requirements.
Dose modulation. Excellent—Two dose-modulation
techniques are used, AutomA and SmartmA. AutomA
works just for the z-axis, while SmartmA works in all
three dimensions. The settings are based on the scout im-
age. A dose saving of 42% was demonstrated.
When using dose modulation, each facility specifies the
target standard deviation and the range of acceptable mA
values. Once specified, these settings are built into allstandard protocols, making dose modulation easy to use.
A dose record is made with all studies as an additional
text image within the DICOM data. This report includes
both the dose length product and CT dose index (CTDI vol).
Therefore, dose data can be retrospectively reviewed.
During cardiac exams, the dose is modulated based on
the ECG. Measurements with our cardiac phantom showed
dose savings of about 20% at a heart rate of 65 bpm com -
pared to a non-ECG-modulated exam.
Workflow integration—Excellent
Clinical experience. Excellent—All users surveyed re-
ported that they would choose GE again for a CT system.
The system is equipped with either an 85 kW or 100
kW generator; these are the highest powers available for
any CT system. Higher power means that most obese pa-
tients can be scanned without the need to adjust standard
protocols. Several users commented that this aids
workflow.
The acquisition console uses a standard dual-monitor
configuration. While other manufacturers also offer
dual-monitor configurations, we found that the GE consolemakes the most efficient use of the additional space avail-
able. For example, one monitor is used to display text,
while the second monitor is used just to display images.
GE uses descriptive names for the reconstruction filters.
What’s more, the choices offered to the user are limited to
those that are clinically useful. So while users must usually
choose between multiple coded options (e.g., UB, B31s,
FC22) that often have only subtle differences, GE makes it
easy for the user to select the most appropriate option
(e.g., soft, standard, lung, chest, detail, bone, edge,
boneplus).
Image acquisition performance. Good—No significant
findings to report.
Postprocessing. Excellent—While no second console is
available for postprocessing, it is possible to access a prior
patient without interfering with the present exam.
A comprehensive range of clinical applications is avail-
able on the AW and the acquisition console. These include
full cardiac analysis (including pacemaker planning), brain
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 389
GE phantom images. 1.3 mm catheter imaged at simu-
lated 85 bpm (top) and irregular heart rate (middle). Thestationary image (bottom) serves as a baseline.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 14/26
perfusion (GE is developing a shuttle technique that will
double the coverage possible in stroke detection), vessel
analysis (including thrombus assessment), computer-
assisted lung measurement (not available on the acquisi-
tion console), and virtual colonography (including a dis-
section view).
A standard feature on the LightSpeed systems is exam
split, which enables studies of contiguous body parts to be
split prospectively and given new accession numbers. This
has advantages for billing.
Ease of use. Good—No significant findings to report.
Connectivity. Good—In addition to meeting all our
DICOM requirements, the LightSpeed meets most of the
appropriate IHE profiles, including Scheduled Workflow,
Patient Information Reconciliation, Consistent Presenta-
tion of Images, and Presentation of Grouped Procedures.
Service and support—Good
User feedback. Excellent—All users reported a generally
positive experience regarding service.
Training. Excellent—In addition to the standard training
offerings, GE provides Training in Partnership (TiP) Vir-
tual Assist, in which a GE specialist can remotely controlan AW workstation through a VPN connection. This al-
lows users to access expert help at almost any time. In ad-
dition, GE provides various business analysis services,
such as Imaging Roadmap and Realize VCT, that are de-
signed to optimize the training and clinical services.
Reliability and maintenance. Good—The x-ray tube is
warranted to last for 6,000 patients, which equates to a
year under normal use. Standard warranty conditions re-
flect this. Assuming 20 seconds per patient, this equates to
120,000 scan seconds.
Planning. Good — No significant findings to report.
390 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Specifications for GE CT Systems
Description LightSpeed VCT BrightSpeed Elite BrightSpeed Select
Number of slices 64, 32 16, 8, 4 16, 8, 6
Detector coverage (z-axis), mm 40 20 20
Number of detectors (z-axis) 64 24 24
Minimum slice width, mm 0.625 0.625 0.625
Minimum rotation time, sec 0.4; 0.35 optional 0.5 0.8
Generator power, kW 85; 100 optional 53 42
Large focal spot, mm 0.9 × 0.9 0.9 × 0.7 0.9 × 0.7
Small focal spot, mm 0.6 × 0.7 0.6 × 0.7 0.6 × 0.7
X-ray tube heat storage, MHU 8 6.3 3.5
X-ray tube cooling rate, kHU/min 1,782 840 820
Standard patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 227 (500) 180 (400) 205 (451)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25 ±0.25 ±1
Optional patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) NA 205 (451) NA
Precision of table movement, mm NA ±1 NA
Minimum height of patient table,
cm (in)
43 (17) 52 (20) 44 (17)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 15/26
Philips Medical Systems Brilliance 64
Supplier. Philips Medical Systems International [415450],
Best (The Netherlands); 31 (40) 2763051 n Philips Medi-
cal Systems North America [102120], Bothell, Washing-
ton (USA); +1 (800) 722-7900, +1 (425) 487-7000 n
www.medical.philips.com
Product availability. Introduced in 2005, this product is
marketed worldwide.
The system we tested. We performed our testing on a
Brilliance 64 with software release 2.2.1. The system was
located in the manufacturer’s testing and manufacturing
facility.
Product DescriptionThe Brilliance family of CT systems includes systems of-
fering 6 to 64 slices. In addition, the 16-slice Brilliance
Big Bore (85 cm) configuration is available, primarily for
oncology applications.
The standard Brilliance 64 scanner configuration in-
cludes a dual-monitor acquisition console to control scan-
ning, image reconstruction, and postprocessing. All
clinical applications can be accessed from the console. In
addition, the Extended Brilliance Workspace is an image
analysis workstation and has full access to both the raw
data and processed images, so images can be reprocessed
remotely. In addition, a thin client-server product, knownas the Brilliance Workspace Portal, is available. The portal
enables almost any networked computer to run a suite of
advanced applications.
Significant Test Results
Image quality—Good
Noise characteristics. Good—No significant findings to
report.
Slice thickness and spatial resolution. Good—No sig-
nificant findings to report.Uniformity. Good—The uniformity across a 250 mm di-
ameter phantom was within 3.6 HU, which is within our
criterion of 5 HU.
Temporal resolution. Excellent—When using our dy-
namic cardiac phantom, the scores (5 = clear and sharp
to 1 = unusable) for the 1.3 mm simulated catheter were
5 at 65 bpm, 4 at 75 bpm, 3 at 85 bpm, and 2 for the ir-
regular heart rate. The larger catheters were easily visible
regardless of heart rate. (Some of the phantom images are
shown on the next page.)
The cardiac images are reconstructed with a 0.9 mm
slice width and a smooth reconstruction filter (XCB). This
means that the images appear to have low noise. However,
the smooth reconstruction filter will also tend to reduce the
resolution. This may explain why the diameter of the sim-ulated contrast-filled vessel appeared to be too wide (2.4
mm compared to 1.3 mm).
Artifacts. Good—No significant findings to report.
Dose management—Excellent
Dose. Excellent—Infant and pediatric protocols are auto-
matically applied when appropriate, based on the patient’s
age.
Philips has just commercially introduced a cardiac
dose-reduction technique called Step & Shoot. While it
was not available during our testing, its technical detailsare similar to those of GE’s Cardiac SnapShot Pulse tech-
nique, which will be commercially introduced soon; we
did test the SnapShot Pulse, finding that it shows signifi-
cant dose savings. Therefore, ECRI Institute expects that
the Philips approach will demonstrate similar results—in-
cluding limitations such as not being usable with higher
heart rates and producing an image of only one part of the
cardiac phase.
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 391
Acceptable. The Philips Brilliance 64 provides high-
quality images and includes some useful and unique
applications, such as remote access to raw data and
large-coverage stroke detection.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 16/26
392 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Dose modulation. Excellent—The dose modulation
function (called DOM) operates in both the 2-D and 3-D
modes based on the Surview (scout) image. A dose saving
up to 60% was demonstrated. The operation of the DOM
is dependent on the automatic current selection (ACS),
which aims for constant noise (standard deviation)
throughout the image. Once ACS is calibrated, the user
simply selects the required noise level.
Dose modulation based on the ECG is standard in car-
diac exams. Measurement with our phantom showed dose
savings of about 15% at a heart rate of 65 bpm.
Workflow integration—Excellent
Clinical experience. Excellent—All users surveyed re-
ported that they would choose Philips again for a CT sys-
tem. Users commented that being able to use the small
focal spot at maximum power (for a limited exposure
time) was an advantage, since it enables high-resolution
imaging even with large patients.
Image acquisition performance. Excellent—The sys-
tem’s Jog Mode (used for brain perfusion imaging) is
useful and well accepted by patients. According to a
long-term user, the images are of similar quality to thosefrom magnetic resonance.
During acquisition, a subset of the images is displayed
to the operator as they are reconstructed (using an optional
feature called Evolve), so the user has feedback and can
terminate and rescan the exam if necessary.
Postprocessing. Excellent—Any user of the Philips 3-D
workstation (Extended Brilliance Workspace) can repro-
cess raw data remotely. In addition, via the Workspace
Portal option, remote users can view and process 3-D CT
data using any networked computer.
A comprehensive range of clinical applications is avail-able on any Brilliance Workspace, including the acquisition
console. These applications include full cardiac analysis,
brain perfusion (Philips has the Jog Mode technique, which
will double the brain volume covered in stroke detection),
vessel analysis, computer-assisted lung measurement
(computer-aided detection is under development), and
colonography (including a dissection view). In addition,
Philips offers its TrueView technology, which exports car-
diac data to a Philips cath lab and shows the cardiologist
how to obtain the projections obtained from CT.
A standard feature on the Brilliance 64 and 40 systems
is split study. This enables studies of contiguous body
parts to be split prospectively and given new accession
numbers. This has advantages for billing.
Ease of use. Good—No significant findings to report.
Connectivity. Good—In addition to meeting all our
DICOM requirements, the Brilliance meets some of the
IHE profiles we specified, including Scheduled Workflow
and Patient Information Reconciliation.
Service and support—Good
User feedback. Excellent—All users reported a generally
positive experience regarding service.
Training. Good—Philips has a Web-based NetForum
community for users to ask questions and access instruc-
tional materials (e.g., lectures).
Reliability and maintenance. Good—The x-ray tube is
warranted for 12 months and is not prorated; if the tube
fails at any time during the warranty period, a replacement
will be installed at no cost. The expected life of the tube is
Philips phantom images. 1.3 mm catheter imaged at
simulated 85 bpm (top) and irregular heart rate (middle).
The stationary image (bottom) serves as a baseline.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 17/26
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 393
250,000 scan seconds, which is the longest of the evalu-
ated systems.
Philips offers a co-op agreement for non-Philips techni-
cians to access the same service support as that available
to Philips technicians.
Philips also offers a technology update program toall service customers, in which all applicable software
options are migrated when new versions (including up-
grades) are released, and computer hardware is swapped
after 3 years. The program is available to all Philips ser-
vice customers.
Planning. Excellent—Philips provides complete installa-
tion planning, physicist information, and site surveys (in-
cluding power quality) to the purchaser. Planning includes
provisions for the predictable requirements for future CT
technology upgrades.
Unique to Philips is the availability of Ambient Experi-ence, which is an integrated room design that is intended
to reduce patient anxiety using lighting and curved spaces
that are meant to be less threatening. Users of Ambient
Experience have reported reduced use of sedation in pedi-
atric patients.
Specifications for Philips Brilliance CT Systems
Description Brilliance 64 Brilliance 16
Number of slices 64, 40 16, 6
Detector coverage (z-axis), mm 40 24
Number of detectors (z-axis) 64 24
Minimum slice width, mm 0.625 (2 × 0.5) 0.75 (2 × 0.6)
Minimum rotation time, sec 0.5; 0.4 optional 0.5; 0.4 optional
Generator power, kW 60 60
Large focal spot, mm 1 × 1 1 × 1
Small focal spot, mm 0.5 × 1 0.5 × 1
X-ray tube heat storage, MHU 8 8
X-ray tube cooling rate, kHU/min 1,608 1,608
Standard patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 204 (450) 204 (450)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25 ±0.25
Optional patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 295 (650) 295 (650)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25 ±0.25
Minimum height of patient table, cm (in) 53 (21) 53 (21)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 18/26
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 19/26
catheters were easily visible regardless of heart rate.
(Some of the phantom images are shown on this page.)
Artifacts. Good—No significant findings to report.
Dose management—Excellent
Dose. Excellent—The Sensation’s CareDose 4D dose-modulation application includes provisions for pediatric
patients based on weight.
Siemens is making its forthcoming cardiac step-and-
shoot feature available free of charge to its customers. It is
similar to other axial cardiac dose-reduction techniques,
and Siemens predicts that a 80% dose reduction will be
possible. However, the Sensation’s smaller z-axis cover-
age will likely limit the clinical utility of the technique
with the Sensation 64 compared to other 64-slice systems,
since the Sensation will require twice as many steps as the
others to cover the same anatomy, making dose reduction
more difficult.
Dose modulation. Excellent—The built-in protocols are
initially set up with the lowest dose. What’s more, the dosemodulation feature, CareDose 4D, operates in both the
2-D and 3-D modes based on the topogram (scout) image
and real-time feedback during the scan. A dose saving up
to 40% was demonstrated.
The operation of the CareDose 4D is dependent on the
configured reference point. Unlike other dose-modulation
techniques, CareDose does not aim for constant noise. In-
stead, the dose for smaller patients is not reduced as much,
and the dose for larger patients is not increased as much.
Siemens believes that this approach is more beneficial in
terms of matching the image quality to the clinical need. It
also reduces the mA required for very large patients, so
you are less likely to have problems when scanning obese
subjects.
Dose modulation based on ECG is standard in cardiac
exams. At the time of our testing, Siemens was in the pro-
cess of introducing a revised ECG modulation technique
that is designed to more accurately predict the R-R interval
rather than simply average the previous three intervals.
Results presented by Siemens show that the new approach
achieves an average dose reduction of 39%, which is dou-
ble that normally found. The higher dose reduction is a re-
sult of being able to more reliably set narrower pulsesbased on the ECG.
Workflow integration—Good
Clinical experience. Good—All users surveyed reported
that they would choose Siemens again for a CT system.
Image acquisition performance. Good—During acquisi-
tion, a subset of the images is displayed to the operator as
they are reconstructed, so the user has feedback and can
stop the exam if necessary.
Postprocessing. Excellent—WorkStream 4D automates
most of the routine postprocessing steps so that technolo-gists do not have to manually process the images into the
required projections and views, as would be normally re-
quested by the radiologist. If used properly, this saves time
and should enhance workflow.
Full reprocessing is possible at the Syngo Acquisition
Workplace, which can be fitted with dual monitors as an
option (Syngo is the Siemens interface for all imaging mo-
dalities). In addition, a separate Syngo CT Workplace,
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 395
Siemens phantom images. 1.3 mm catheter imaged at
simulated 85 bpm (top) and irregular heart rate (middle).
The stationary image (bottom) serves as a baseline. The
gaps visible in the top two images were caused by air
bubbles that could not be completely purged from the
contrast media; these can be disregarded.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 20/26
which shares the same database as the main Acquisition
Workplace, can be used for raw data reprocessing and
clinical applications. Since the database is shared, there is
no delay in transferring data. Distributed reading can be
achieved with Syngo MultiModality Workplaces or via the
Syngo WebSpace.
A comprehensive range of clinical applications is avail-
able on any Syngo Workplace, including the acquisition
console. These applications include full cardiac analysis,
brain perfusion, vessel analysis, computer-aided lung-nod-
ule detection (computer-aided detection has premarket ap-
proval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
[FDA]), and colonography. In addition, Siemens has re-
cently introduced technology that exports cardiac data to a
Siemens cath lab and shows the cardiologist how to obtain
the projections obtained in CT.
Ease of use. Excellent—If the user sets nonviable study
parameters, the Scan Assist feature displays a window that
shows the interdependence of all the settings. In addition,
the scan parameters (e.g., pitch) are freely selectable.
Therefore, the user can quickly find suitable alternative
settings with minimum compromise.
Connectivity. Good—The Sensation meets all our
DICOM requirements, plus three of the IHE profiles we
specified: Scheduled Workflow, Patient Information Rec-
onciliation, and Consistent Presentation of Images.
Service and support—Good
User feedback. Excellent—All users reported a generally
positive experience regarding service.
Training. Excellent—Siemens runs three training centers
within the United States as part of the Siemens Remote
Services, which are offered at no cost to customers; it re-
quires a VPN connection. Users can contact applications
specialists via the Acquisition Workplace.
Reliability and maintenance. Good—The x-ray tube has
an unlimited 12-month warranty. After 12 months, the
coverage is prorated with a minimum coverage of 160,000
scan seconds. Additional coverage (scan seconds) can be
396 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Specifications for Selected
Siemens Single-Source CT Systems
Description Sensation 64 Emotion 16 Spirit
Number of slices 64 16, 2 2Detector coverage (z-axis), mm 28.8 24 10
Number of detectors (z-axis) 40* 16 2
Minimum slice width, mm 0.6; 0.3 optional 0.6 1
Minimum rotation time, sec 0.37; 0.33 optional 0.6; 0.5 optional 0.8
Generator power, kW 80 50 24
Large focal spot, mm 0.8 x 1.1 0.8 x 0.7 0.8 x 0.7
Small focal spot, mm 0.6 x 0.7 0.8 x 0.5 NA
X-ray tube heat storage, MHU 0** 6 2
X-ray tube cooling rate, kHU/min 5,000 810 700
Standard patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 205 (450) 200 (440) 220 (480)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25 ±0.25 ±0.25
Optional patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 280 (615) NA NA
Precision of table movement, mm Not specified NA NA
Minimum height of patient table, cm (in) 53 (21) 45 (18) 45 (18)
* Siemens uses a technology it calls z-Sharp to produce 64 slices; 64-slice acquisition is only possible during spiral acquisition.
** Siemens specifies the equivalent heat storage to be 30 MHU based on the tube’s rapid cooling (see next line).
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 21/26
purchased. Customers without tube coverage automatically
have a prorated 160,000-scan-second warranty.
Another warranty-related feature offered by Siemens is
the optional Syngo Evolve Package. Purchasers of this
package receive a computer hardware and software up-
grade after three years. The Syngo Evolve Package is in-
cluded in Gold level service contracts.
Users of Siemens Remote Services are proactively
monitored from Cary, North Carolina. If a problem is
identified, the service center will contact the customer.
Siemens estimates that 50% of problems can be fixed re-
motely. In addition, Siemens can now provide utilization
management and service data direct to users via e-mail.
Planning. Good — No significant findings to report.
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 397
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 22/26
Toshiba Medical Systems Aquilion 64
Supplier. Toshiba Corp. Medical Systems Co. Ltd.
[140664], Otawara-shi Tochigi Pref., (Japan); 81 (287)
266301; www.toshiba-medical.co.jp n Toshiba America
Medical Systems Inc. [101894], Tustin, California (USA);
+1 (800) 621-1968, +1 (714) 730-5000; www.medical.
toshiba.com
Product availability. Introduced in 2005; marketed
worldwide
The system we tested. We performed our testing on an
Aquilion 64 with software release V3.00ER003. The sys-
tem was located in the manufacturer’s testing facility.
Product Description
The Aquilion family of CT systems includes systems with 4to 64 slices; apart from the number of slices, the standard
Aquilion systems have identical specifications. Also avail-
able is the 16-slice Aquilion Large Bore (90 cm) configura-
tion, which is intended primarily for oncology and general
radiography applications (e.g., trauma and bariatrics).
The standard scanner configuration includes two inde-
pendent consoles. Both consoles can be used for study man-
agement and raw data processing. In addition, the scan
console is used for scanning, while the display console can be
used for some 3-D processing. Additional 3-D applications
are available on the Vitrea workstation (supplied by Vital
Images Inc. [331069], Minnetonka, Minnesota, www.
vitalimages.com), which is generally sold with the Aquilion.
The Aquilion and Vitrea both support the enhanced DICOM
CT standard, which enables much faster image transfer com-
pared to the normal DICOM CT standard.
Significant Test Results
Image quality—Excellent
Noise characteristics. Good—No significant findings
to report.
Slice thickness and spatial resolution. Excellent—Theactual slice thickness used for routine imaging is the nar-
rowest we measured (0.6 mm; nominal = 0.5 mm). What’s
more, we found that the slice width profiles had the least
spread—that is, were overall the narrowest—of all the
evaluated systems. Therefore, the actual slice width most
closely matches the resolution set during scan planning.
Uniformity. Excellent—The uniformity across a 250 mm
diameter phantom was less than 1 HU, which is well
within our criterion of 5 HU. Also, the uniformity between
contiguous axial slices was 0.8 HU for 8 mm slices and
1.5 HU for 0.5 mm slices. These values are also well
within our criteria.
Temporal resolution. Excellent—When using our dy-
namic cardiac phantom, the scores (5 = clear and sharp to
1 = unusable) for the 1.3 mm simulated catheter were 5 at65 bpm, 4 at 75 bpm, 4 at 85 bpm, and 4 for the irregular
heart rate. The larger catheters were easily visible regard-
less of heart rate. These were the best scores of the sys-
tems evaluated. (Some of the phantom images are shown
on the next page.)
Toshiba has two applications that are designed to aid
cardiac image acquisition. SureCardio is used before the
acquisition to record the effects of breathholding on the
patient’s ECG, providing a more accurate ECG record
for gating. Following the exam, the PhaseXact technique
is used to automatically select the phase with the leastcoronary movement. For most patients, the optimal phase
will be predictable; however, it is well established that in
some cases (e.g., higher heart rates), different cardiac
phases are better for imaging. All manufacturers offer the
ability to manually select different phases to reconstruct,
but PhaseXact automates this process. If the results are
not satisfactory, the user can always revert to the manual
technique.
398 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Preferred. Offers superior image quality, most signifi-
cantly for cardiac imaging, as well as tools to help technol-
ogists achieve reproducible, consistent results.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 23/26
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 399
We found that the cardiac images are reconstructed
with a 0.5 mm slice width and a sharp reconstruction filter
(FC43), with the result that the simulated coronaries ap-
peared to be sharp and well defined. As a result, measure-
ment of the diameter closely matched the actual diameter,
which is an advantage. However, any flaw in the image is
also very visible, which is not the case if a smoother filteris used.
Artifacts. Good—No significant findings to report.
Dose management—Excellent
Dose. Excellent—The Aquilion offers the SureExposure
3-D dose-modulation technique, which automatically
adjusts the exposure parameters based on the patient’s
measured x-ray composition, operating on the principle of
keeping the noise level constant. In addition, pediatric pro-
tocols are automatically triggered by the patient’s date
of birth.
The system uses two bow-tie filters to shape the x-ray
beam before it is incident on the patient. The bow-tie filteris automatically selected to match the field of view. These
filters help optimize the dose to the clinical requirements.
Dose modulation. Excellent—SureExposure demon-
strated a dose saving up to 40%.
Users define the target standard deviation and the range
of acceptable mA values. These settings are built into all
standard protocols, making dose modulation easy to use.
A dose record is recorded with all studies as an addi-
tional image within the DICOM data. This report includes
both the dose length product and CTDIvol.
Dose modulation based on ECG is standard in cardiac
exams. Measurements with our cardiac phantom showed
dose savings of about 13% at a heart rate of 65 bpm.
Workflow integration—Good
Clinical experience. Good—All users surveyed reported
that they would choose Toshiba again for a CT system.
Two independent workstations are provided as standard.
Both workstations can process raw data. Therefore, a cur-
rent study should not need to be interrupted if any repro-
cessing is required.
Image acquisition performance. Good—During image
acquisition, the SureScan feature displays a subset of the
images to the operator at 12 fps, so the user has feedback
and can stop the exam if necessary.
The SureFluoro feature is used in biopsy cases and dis-
plays three slices in real time instead of the normal single
slice. Therefore, the physician can have more images to
guide the biopsy needle.
Postprocessing. Excellent—Full reprocessing is possible
at the acquisition and display consoles so long as the raw
data remains.Toshiba relies on Vital Images’ Vitrea workstation for
most applications and develops applications in close part-
nership with Vital Images. The Vitrea offers a comprehen-
sive range of clinical 3-D applications. These include
full cardiac analysis, brain perfusion, vessel analysis,
computer-aided lung nodule detection (using the R2 CAD
algorithm, which has FDA premarket approval), and
virtual colonography.
Toshiba phantom images. 1.3 mm catheter imaged at
simulated 85 bpm (top) and irregular heart rate (middle).The stationary image (bottom) serves as a baseline. The
gaps visible in the top two images were caused by air
bubbles that could not be completely purged from the
contrast media; these can be disregarded.
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 24/26
Ease of use. Excellent—A number of “Sure” techniques
are available that automate acquisition and processing.
Unique to Toshiba is SureCardio, which automatically re-
cords the patient’s ECG during a rehearsal scan while pre-
paring for a cardiac scan. The system can then better
predict the ECG during the real scan. Also, SureExposure
shows the user what the image would look like based on
the parameters selected.
Connectivity. Good—In addition to meeting all our
DICOM requirements, the Aquilion meets most of the IHE
profiles we specified, including Scheduled Workflow, Pa-
tient Information Reconciliation, Consistent Presentations
of Images, and Presentation of Grouped Procedures.
Service and support—Good
User feedback. Excellent—All users reported a generally
positive experience regarding service.
Training. Excellent—Toshiba has recently expanded its
user training academy in Tustin, California, for both
technologists and radiologists. In addition to the standard
training offerings, Toshiba has started an e-mail service
allowing users to directly contact applications specialists.
Reliability and maintenance. Good—The MegaCool
x-ray tube is warranted to last for 200,000 rotations, which
equates to approximately 100,000 scan seconds. Standard
warranty conditions reflect this. Our survey found that us-ers were consistently achieving more than 12 months’ use
from their tubes. While other manufacturers also often
achieve more than 12 months’ use, the record is far from
consistent. We believe there are a number of reasons for
the high consistency, including the moderate power speci-
fication, which means that high mA is not used routinely;
use of a grounded anode (it is usually at +75 kV), which
allows the anode to be directly cooled; and the larger focal
spot size used. This longer life may translate into consider-
able cost savings over the life of the equipment.
Access to service tools does not require the payment of
licensing fees. Therefore, there are no recurring annual
fees for in-house service.
Planning. Good—No significant findings to report.
400 HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 ■ www.ecri.org ©2007 ECRIInstitute.Duplication ofthis page by any meansfor any purposeis prohibited.
Specifications for Toshiba Aquilion CT Systems
Description Aquilion Systems
Number of slices 64, 32, 16, 4
Detector coverage (z-axis), mm 32
Number of detectors (z-axis) 64
Minimum slice width, mm 0.5
Minimum rotation time, sec 0.5; 0.4, 0.35 optional
Generator power, kW 60; 72 optional
Large focal spot, mm 1.6 × 1.6
Small focal spot, mm 0.9 × 0.8
X-ray tube heat storage, MHU 7.5
X-ray tube cooling rate, kHU/min 1,386
Standard patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 200 (440)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25
Optional patient table
Weight limit, kg (lb) 280 (615)
Precision of table movement, mm ±0.25
Minimum height of patient table, cm (in) 30 (12)
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 25/26
Choosing a System
What You Need to Know When Interpreting CT Product Specifications
As a supplement to the findings from this month’s Evalua-tion of CT scanners, we provide this guide for readers who
desire a more general discussion of the factors that should
be considered when purchasing a CT scanner. By examin-
ing and considering the following discussion in addition to
reviewing our Evaluation findings, you can gain the per-
spectives necessary to select a unit that we did not evaluate
to ensure that it meets the needs of the clinical environ-
ment(s) for which it is intended.
A significant challenge for buyers is the fact that—even
though manufacturers follow international standards when
specifying CT performance—different companies’ specifi-
cations are not necessarily stated in the same terms. There-
fore, buyers often need to obtain further information and
conduct additional analysis.
The following factors are relevant regardless of the
number of slices chosen.
X-ray DoseThe radiation hazards of CT have only recently been fully
recognized. Dose-modulation techniques are now standard
and are of comparable effectiveness among the evaluated
systems. However, the dose required for suitable image
quality may not be comparable among the systems.
An example of the complexity of comparing doses is
the question of how dose is reported. All manufacturers
routinely report volume CT dose index (CTDI vol) values in
their specifications. These values are normalized with re-
spect to mAs. Yet there is no reason to expect that the
same mAs will be used by different CT systems for the
same exam, so directly comparing the CTDIvol values will
not yield meaningful information.
To illustrate this point, the CTDIvol values taken from
manufacturers’ specifications are reported in the table on
this page. Comparing the dose requires that we also knowtypical mAs values used by each system. (Unfortunately,
now that automatic dose control is standard, typical values
are hard to establish. The values we report here are esti-
mated from manufacturer literature and discussions we
have had with the manufacturers.) Multiplying the CTDI vol
by the typical effective mAs, then dividing by 100, yields
comparative CTDI values (bottom row of the table); ob-
serve that the lowest-dose system is not the one with the
lowest CTDIvol. Therefore, CTDIvol cannot be used tocompare devices. Instead, potential buyers should seek the
typical mAs values employed by existing users.
The next technological step in dose reduction is to fur-
ther reduce the dose during specific studies—cardiac ex-
ams, for example. Some manufacturers are now installing
systems that incorporate these more task-specific tech-
niques. Early experience with these systems has demon-
strated that further dose savings are possible. However,
there is usually some degree of tradeoff between dose re-
duction and the diagnostic efficacy of the images. So com-
paring the dose savings possible on different systems will
require an in-depth understanding of the technologies
involved.
X-ray ProductionThe power of a system’s x-ray generation (the output of
the x-ray tube and generator, measured in kW) seems to be
an easy specification to compare and is often used as such.
The power directly affects the maximum tube current that
is available (greater tube currents enable larger patients to
be scanned with shorter rotation times). Nevertheless, a
100 kW system is not twice as effective as a 50 kW sys-
tem. One reason is that, because of noise considerations,doubling the tube current increases the image quality by
only a factor of 1.4. A second reason is that the dose per
mAs is not a fixed quantity. As the CTDI values in the ta-
ble below demonstrate, some systems output 1.7 times the
dose for the same mAs. In some cases, therefore, the same
image quality can be achieved with less mAs. So generator
power specifications should not be compared in isolation.
Other factors—in particular, the typical power and mAs
needed for obese patients—should also be compared.
©2007 ECRI Institute. Duplication of this page by any means for any purpose is prohibited. www.ecri.org ■ HEALTH DEVICES December 2007 401
Comparison of ManufacturerCTDI Data
GE Philips Siemens Toshiba
CTDIvol, body,
mGy
8.5 5.6 6.7 9.4
Typical body
mAs
140 250 150 150
Comparative
CTDI, mGy
11.9 14.0 10.05 14.1
7/27/2019 64-Slice CT Scanners Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/64-slice-ct-scanners-evaluation 26/26
Image Processing
Image reconstruction takes considerably longer than image
acquisition. While the fastest scanner can generate almost
200 images per second, the fastest reconstruction rate is 20
images per second. So even with the fastest computers, a
10-second scan can take almost two minutes to reconstruct.
Our measurements showed that a system’s overall scan
time—that is, the acquisition and processing times com-
bined—has little correlation with the specified reconstruc-
tion rate. Some systems start to process while the scan is
continuing, while others wait until the scan is complete.
What’s more, the maximum specified reconstruction rate
is highly dependent on the scan and reconstruction param-
eters (e.g., pitch, slice thickness, increment, reconstruction
filter). So it is very difficult to compare reconstruction rate
specifications. Buyers should ask to time typical clinical
cases.
Workflow andClinical Applications
All the images produced by a CT scanner must be viewed
and interpreted by a physician, so physicians must have the
tools to manage and display large data volumes. General-
purpose PACS workstations do not provide such tools,
however, meaning that more specialized workstations are
necessary. The possible choices include using a networked
workstation from the CT manufacturer, using standard
workstations connected to the CT scanner via a Web-based
application, and using a third-party workstation.
Each CT and workstation manufacturer has a different
approach to how to fit the CT data into the workflow. It is
not yet clear whether there is an optimum approach. The
use of remote general-purpose computers (thin client) ac-cessing a central processing computer (server) is becoming
more common. This provides a more cost-effective way to
share expensive resources and also allows physicians to
more easily access the advanced tools.
Each of the available solutions offers similar 3-D re-
construction and viewing functionality. Features such as
bone removal, vessel analysis, lung nodule measurement,
brain perfusion measurement, and colonography are avail-
able as options from every vendor. Differences among
systems include more specific features such as com-
puter-aided detection, stent planning, bone densitometry,
body perfusion measurement, pacemaker planning, and
dental imaging. Therefore, you should select the appropri-
ate 3-D processing based on your specific technical and
clinical needs.
Make sure you clearly understand the strengths and
limitations of each manufacturer’s approach and how it
fits your situation and requirements. Factors that will af-
fect your selection include your physicians’ preferences,
diagnostic workstations you already have, your network
bandwidth, the specialized software tools available from
the manufacturers, and the layout of your facility. ◆
ECRI Institute Reprint Policy
All material in ECRI Institute publications is protected by
copyright law. Readers may not copy, resell, or quote this
material in promotional literature.
ECRI Institute does make reprints of individual articlesor complete publications available for educational pur-
poses. For further information, contact Client Management
Services by phone at +1 (610) 825-6000, ext. 5891, or
through e-mail at clientservices@ecri.org.