A Study of Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury Concentrations in Windsor,...

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views 2 download

Tags:

transcript

Xiaohong (Iris) Xu, Umme Akhtar, Kyle Clark, Xiaobin Wang

University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario Canada

July 2014

Outline

• Background

• Objectives

• Method

• Results

• Summary & future work

2

Air Quality in Windsor, Ontario, Canada

• Industrial sources:– Automotive capital of US & Canada – Other sectors: power generation

and chemical facilities

• Mobile sources: – Ambassador Bridge: busiest international

crossing in North America– 25% of goods by trade values – 10,000 heavy duty trucks/day– 4,000 cars/day

3

Objectives

• To investigate – temporal variability: diurnal, day-of-week,

seasonal, and inter-annual

– relationship between TGM and other pollutants

– relationship between TGM and weather conditions

– effect of variability in TGM and other parameters

– effect of “outliers”

4

Monitor Site & Instrumentation

• TGM University of Windsor

campus Near the entrance/exit of

the Ambassador Bridge Tekran 2537A

• Weather data: Windsor Airport (10 km)

• Other air pollutants: Windsor Downtown Air Quality Station (2 km)

• Study period: 2007-2011

Windsor

ONTARIONTARIOO

N

ON

U of W

5

Annual TGM

6

Three-year mean: 1.8 ng/m3

Monthly TGM

7121110987654321

5

4

3

2

1

0

Month

Hg c

once

ntr

ation (

ng/m

3)

Seasonal TGM

8fallsummerspringwinter

5

4

3

2

1

0

Hg c

once

ntr

ati

on (

ng/m

3)

Day-of-week TGM

9weekdaySundaySaturday

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

Hg c

once

ntr

ation (

ng/m

3)

Diurnal TGM

1023222120191817161514131211109876543210

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.0

1.9

1.8

1.7

1.6

Hg c

once

ntr

ati

on (

ng/m

3)

Diurnal TGM by Season

11

Temporal Variability – ANOVA

12

Parameter R2 (%)Season 2.65Year 0.96Hour-of-day 0.89Day-of-week 0.60All of above 5.4

GLM: 2007-2009 data & TGM as dependent variable

Relationship with Other Parameters

13

Parameter R2 (adj)NOx 2.1+temperature 3.0+O3 3.4

+pressure 3.7

Stepwise regression: TGM as dependent variable

Correlation with Other Parameters

14

Pearson: all significant at p < 0.05 except shaded cells

• +tv with NO, NO2, NOx, CO and PM2.5: common sources• −tv with O3: photo-chemistry• −tv with wind speed and pressure: dispersion and mixing• A lack of strong correlations: all data and by season• Similar results with Spearman

TGM and NOx

15

• Not all by out of phase in hour-of-day

• Large variability in both compounds

• Low TGM when NOx high

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

TGM

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pb)

Winter Spring Summer Fall

TGM & NOx in Fall

16

• Similar trends

• Afternoon low NOx but relatively high TGM with grater variability

TGM & NOx in Fall

17

• Get hour-of-day concentrations: TGM and NOx in fall

• Add noise to recreate hourly concentrations

• Noise: log-normal distribution with zero mean: based on hour-of-day SD

Effect of Outliers

18

• Full model (GLM), all significant at p<0.05

• Season, year, hour of day, day-of-week

• Plus NOx, SO2, O3, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed

• Original data: R2 =21%

• Remove hourly TGM >12 ng/m3, R2=31%

Summary

• Annualgradual decrease from 2007 – 2009

• Seasonalhigher in summer and winter compared to fall and

spring variability high in summer and low in wintersimilar to some urban sites with industrial impact

• Day-of-week10% higher on weekdays than weekends

19

Summary

Diurnal •Similar trends in winter and fall

•Summer − steep decrease right after noon: strong oxidation & strong mixing

•Spring − early depletion: oxidation

•Similar to some urban sites with industrial impact

20

Summary

• Temporal factors: season, year, hour of day, day-of-week

• A lack of strong correlation with other pollutants and meteorological data

• High TGM when other pollutants were low

• Clear trend with meteorological parameters but great scattering especially in summer and winter

• Overall low % variance explained by temporal factors and environmental conditions– Large variability in TGM and other factors

– Strong influence by a few high TGM events

21

Future Work

• Expend recreation of hourly data using hour-of-day mean and SD to other pollutants /meteorological data in other seasons

• Further investigate the effect of outliers: especially SO2 (right skewed)

22

Acknowledgements

• Technical assistance

Harshal Patel, Mark Zhang, Elizabeth Tuscano

• Equipment: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) & Tekran

• Operation: NSERC

• Travel assistance: University of Windsor

• Editors and reviewers of an article in press: Xu X., Akhtar U., Clark K., Wang X., Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury in Windsor, ON, Canada, Atmosphere, 2014.

23

Conclusions

• TGM concentrations close to other urban sites in the region

• Higher concentrations in summer and winter• Seasonal and diurnal variability influenced by

environmental conditions, such as atmospheric mixing, photochemistry (oxidation), surface emissions

• Pollution rose suggests areas of potential regional sources in east to southwest of Windsor, with seasonal shift

24

Windsor West

Monitoring Site