Post on 22-Jan-2020
transcript
Student Identity Number: 1309308
EBU5002 - DISSERTATION
RESEARCH REPORT
An Investigation of causes and effects of Delayed Payments to Road Contractors in
Malawi for Public Funded Road Projects
Marking Tutor : Ron Smith
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of
MSC IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The University of Bolton
Date : 23 APRIL 2015
Student Identity Number: 1309308
ABSTRACTMalawi is a landlocked country and roads are an integral part of the transportation
system, therefore it is Government of Malawi’s priority that the road network is efficient
so that it achieves both social and economic benefits to the country. Currently, the road
network in Malawi is underdeveloped and the roads are not of international standard
compared to neighbouring countries in the Southern African Development Community
(SADC) and Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (Comesa) regional
trading blocks to which Malawi is a member. Every year, the Government of Malawi
commits substantial sums of money in the national budget to ensure development of the
Road network and maintain the current roads to good standards to ensure continued
and uninterrupted access to all corners of the country by all sectors of the society.
This effort by government to develop the road network is not without challenges.
Delayed payments to road contractors have been a serious bottleneck in the successful
implementation of road projects in Malawi. This is despite the reforms which were
carried out in the Malawi Road Sector in 2005 which saw the creation of two separate
bodies, the Roads Authority and the Roads Fund Administration with separate roles of
administering the road network and managing funds for the road sector respectively.
This paper seeks to explore the causes and effects of delayed payments to Road
Contractors in Malawi and has been confined to exploring the causes of delayed
payments to only those projects which are funded from public coffers, using fuel levy by
the Roads Fund Administration and appropriations from the government annual budget
due to time constraints presented for carrying out the research.
Various findings have arisen from the research project and recommendations have
been made accordingly to improve the current challenge of payment delays and
mitigate resulting effects experienced by contractors and the general public.
Key words: the key words which are often encountered in this research paper include:
payments, contractors, and road construction sector.
i
Student Identity Number: 1309308
TABLE OF CONTENTSABSTRACT......................................................................................................................2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................vi
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1
1.1 Background.........................................................................................................1
1.2 Problem Statement.............................................................................................2
1.3 Research Aim and Objectives.............................................................................3
1.4 Research Questions...........................................................................................3
1.5 Justification for the Research..............................................................................3
1.6 Limitations of the Study and Areas for Further Research...................................4
1.7 Structure of the Dissertation................................................................................5
CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................7
2.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................7
2.2 Main organisations involved in the road construction sector in Malawi...............7
2.3 Successful project execution.............................................................................10
2.3.1 The delayed payment concept...................................................................10
2.3.2 When does late payment occur?................................................................11
2.3.3 Contributing factors to delayed payments to road contractors...................11
2.3.4 The effects of delayed payments to road contractors.................................14
2.3.4.1 Solutions to the problem of delayed payments to road contractors.........16
CHAPTER 3 – Research Design....................................................................................19
2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................19
2.1.1 Research Philosophy..................................................................................20
2.1.2 Research Approach....................................................................................20
2.1.3 Research Strategies...................................................................................21
Student Identity Number: 1309308
2.1.4 Research Choice........................................................................................21
2.1.5 Time Horizons............................................................................................21
2.1.6 Techniques and Procedures.......................................................................22
CHAPTER 4 - DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION..................27
4.1 Data Collection..................................................................................................27
4.1.1 Questionnaire Administration.........................................................................27
1. Road Contractors.................................................................................................28
2. Roads Fund Administration..................................................................................28
3. Roads Authority....................................................................................................29
4. Consultants..........................................................................................................29
4.2 Data Analysis....................................................................................................30
4.2.1 Causes Of delayed Payments.......................................................................34
4.2.2 Effects of Delayed Payments.........................................................................52
4.2.3 Solutions to delayed Payments.....................................................................66
CHAPTER FIVE – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................70
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................1
Table of GraphsGraph 1- Causes of delayed payments (Contractors’ perspective)................................36
Graph 2 - Causes of delayed payments (RFA’s perspective)........................................38
Graph 3 - Causes of delayed payments (RA’s perspective)..........................................41
Graph 4- Causes of delayed payments (Consultants’ perspective)...............................44
Graph 5 - Causes of delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents)..............45
Graph 6 - Effects of delayed payments (Road Contractors’ perspective)......................54
Graph 7 - Effects of delayed payments (Consultant’s)...................................................56
Graph 8 - Effects of delayed payments (RA’s perspective)............................................58
Graph 9 - Effects of delayed payments (RFA’s perspective).........................................60
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Graph 10 - Effects of delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents).............61
Graph 11 - Solutions to delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents)..........66
Table of FiguresFigure -1 - Structure of Dissertation.................................................................................6
Figure 2- Players involved in payment of certificate.........................................................9
Figure 3- Research Concept Map..................................................................................18
Figure 4- Research “Onion” as adopted from (Tosey & Saunders, 2012)......................19
Figure 4- Data Entry for received questionnaires...........................................................32
Figure 5 : Illustration of part of excel worksheet depicting how data was manipulated. .33
Figure 6 - Dissertation Work Plan..................................................................................72
List of Tables
Table 1- Analysis of arrears owed to road contractors.....................................................2
Table 2 - Summary of Sample Sizes..............................................................................24
Table 3- Sample Size Calculation Worksheet................................................................26
Table 4 - Scale of questionnaire responses...................................................................28
Table of Appendices
Appendix 1 – Sample Research Questionnaire...............................................................1
Appendix 2: Excerpts of Interview with Roads Authority Senior Engineer.......................1
Appendix 3: Excerpts of Interview with Head of Finance for RFA....................................1
Table of Keys
Key 1 - Legend to Graph 1.............................................................................................36
Key 2 - Legend to Graph 2.............................................................................................38
Key 3 - Legend to Graph 3.............................................................................................41
Key 4 - Legend to Graph 4.............................................................................................44
Key 5 - Legend to Graph 6.............................................................................................54
Key 6 - Legend to Graph 7.............................................................................................56
Key 7 - Legend to Graph 8.............................................................................................58
Key 8 - Legend to Graph 9.............................................................................................60
Student Identity Number: 1309308
ACRONYMSRFA - Roads Fund Administration
RA – Roads Authority
NCIC – National Construction Industry Council
Government of Malawi – GoM
IPC – Interim Payment Certificate
HoA – Head of Audit
HoF – Head of Finance
NRA – National Roads Authority
PPP – Public Private Partnership
ANRP – Annual National Roads Programme
SE – Senior Engineer
COMESA – Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
SADC – Sothern Africa Development Community
Student Identity Number: 1309308
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSTo come up with this paper, I am indebted to various people and organisations who
provided me with the necessary assistance during the course of the research. Special
mention should go to my supervisors, Ron Smith and Peter Chiligo who provided the
necessary guidance during the course of the research.
Special recognition should go to all Road contractors, Consultants, the Roads Authority
and Roads Fund Administration staff who took time to respond to the questionnaires
and provided time for interviews.
To my wife Blessings and daughter Joan, they deserve my sincere and heart felt
appreciation for the moral and physical support rendered to me during the time they
sacrificed the usual family union that coexists on a daily basis to give me free and
uninterrupted time to concentrate on the dissertation.
Last but not least, I would like to thank my Lord and saviour Jesus Christ for the spiritual
inspiration provided to me throughout the period of the research. This helped me to
conquer all hurdles experienced on the way.
Page vi
Student Identity Number: 1309308
AN INVESTIGATION OFCAUSES AND EFFECTS OF DELAYED PAYMENTS TO ROAD CONTRACTORS IN MALAWI FOR PUBLIC FUNDED ROAD PROJECTS
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 BackgroundMalawi is a landlocked country and heavily relies on road transport for both internal
access between the country’s three regions and external access to its neighbouring
countries of Zambia, Mozambique and Tanzania. The official road network for Malawi
covers a total distance of 15,451km.
This road network is not fully developed, with only 4,045 km i.e. twenty seven percent
(27%) of the total network being paved (Road Network, n.d).
To this end, Malawi government has focused on road network expansion as a national
public sector investment program. This is backed by the Malawi Growth and
Development Strategy (MGDS) which identifies transport infrastructure as a priority area
for public investment, (Government of Malawi, 2010).
Critical to this road network development is the effectiveness of the construction
industry in carrying out its functions. One key player in the construction industry is the
road contractor. To ensure effective delivery of projects, and for good health of the
contractors business, it is imperative for contractors to have smooth cash flow (Hunter,
2012). Good cash flow is fundamental in the development and sustainability of a healthy
and competitive construction industry (Robertson & Maritz, 2012).
Amongst other initiatives to improve service delivery in the road sector in Malawi,
reforms were carried out in the year 2006 which saw the creation of two bodies, the
Roads Fund Administration (RFA) and Roads Authority (RA) with two separate roles of
managing funds for roads and maintaining the road network respectively. The main
reason for the reforms was to enhance efficiency and accountability of public funds
meant for roads as opposed to the previous set up where funds management and road
network maintenance were in the hands of one body, the National Roads Authority.
Page 1
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Apart from the Roads Fund Administration and the Roads Authority, the other key
player in the road sector is the government of Malawi which provides funding for road
constructions through parliamentary appropriations.
1.2 Problem StatementDespite the well set up arrangement in the Malawian road construction industry, there
are many challenges which are faced and need to be overcome. One of the problems is
delayed payment to contractors. Many contractors in Malawi experience delays in
getting paid for work done (Mazengera, 2009).
According to Gara & Hawkins, (2014), as at 30 June 2014, the Malawi government
owed road contractors and other players in the industry for work done, a total sum of
Twenty Seven Billion, Four Hundred Twenty Million Kwacha(MWK27.42Bn) , an
equivalent of Six Eight Million, Five Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($68.55Mn),
where 1USD=MWK400. The sum includes actual amounts claimed for work done plus
interest charged on the delayed payments.
An analysis of the evolution of the arrears as at 30 June 2014 revealed that the amount
outstanding dated as far back as the fiscal year 2009/2010 as depicted in the table
below:
Financial Year Amount of Arrears
2009/2010 $13,073,119
2010/2011 $28,673,435
2011/2012 $27,477,520
2012/2013 $21,256,107
2013/2014 $68,550,400
Table 1- Analysis of arrears owed to road contractors (Gara & Hawkins, 2014))
Page 2
Student Identity Number: 1309308
A review of selected 50 contractor certificates for major road projects for the five year
period between 2009 and 2014 showed that 25% of the certificates were delayed by
exceeding the agreed contract payment period of 45 days from date of logging a
certificate by the contractor to payment date by the Roads Fund Administration.
Late payment challenges are considered to affect many players in the local construction
industry and are referred to as financial problems by those affected by it, whether in
public or private funded projects (Abdul -Rahman et al. 2006).According to Huse, 2002,
timely payment of contractor certificates ensures the well being of contractors.It is
therefore imperative to ascertain the key factors causing delays in payments to
contractors in the context of public funded projects and establish the resulting effects of
these payment delays.
1.3 Research Aim and ObjectivesThe research seeks to investigate the causes contributing to the delayed payments to
road contractors in Malawi and the resulting impact of this delay and develop solutions
to address the causes of delayed payments.
Specifically, the research will address the following two objectives:
1. Establish the causes of delayed payments to road contractors in Malawi
2. Establish the effects of delayed payments
1.4 Research QuestionsIn order to realise the specific objectives of the study, the following questions will be
answered:
1. What are the causes of delayed payments to road contractors in Malawi?
2. What are the effects of delayed payments to road contractors in Malawi?
1.5 Justification for the ResearchThe research on delayed payments to road contractors and the effects this brings is an
important element of project management in the implementation phase of the project life
cycle. The research therefore has an important bearing to the academic field for the
students learning project management because it will increase their knowledge of the
Page 3
Student Identity Number: 1309308
challenges of project management implementation and how to deal with them in relation
to payments to contractors.
Practically, the research will help the road construction industry players; RA, RFA,
Contractors and consultants to resolve current concern of delayed payments to
contractors being experienced in Malawi which has led to the Roads Fund
Administration and the Government of Malawi paying huge sums of money in interest to
road contractors for delayed payments, monies critical to national road network
expansion as well as for maintenance and rehabilitation of roads. From the results of
the research and its recommendations, it is hoped that all parties in the road
construction sector will take necessary strides to eliminate the factors causing the
payment delays.
1.6 Limitations of the Study and Areas for Further ResearchThe constraints encountered when undertaking the research are as follows:
Limited finances to carry out the research, with every resource being financed by
the researcher resulting in limiting the tests to only a sample of a population of
current contractors carrying out works;
Limitation to information accesses as some institutions did not cooperate to
provide institutional information for privacy reasons and lack of trust on the use to
which the research findings would be put. Therefore information was only sought
from institutions which were readily available and were willing to give the
information.
Longitudinal effects: Time available to investigate the research problem was
constrained by the fact that this is an academic research and formed part of an
assignment to attain an academic qualification therefore it had a due date and
the research could only be conducted within this time to meet the deadline. It is
also worth noting that the research was conducted within the researcher’s free
time as he is fully employed and fully attending to work at the time of doing the
research.
There was a limitation in the required number of qualifying personnel to do the
field work. The people approached to do the field work to administer
questionnaires were expensive as such supplementary methods such as emails
were used to administer questionnaires.
Page 4
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The research approach use of mixed methods using questionnaires and
interviews to collect both quantitative and qualitative data but the questionnaire
fell short of collecting qualitative data, with most of the respondents only tackling
the quantitative questions and not providing qualitative information in the sections
provided for this.
Although the research only concentrated on causes and effects of delayed payments to
contractors, this does not exhaust possible research areas relating to the road
construction industry. There is potential for further research on other areas in the sector
such as investigation into factors leading to high rate of project success for donor
funded road projects compared to public funded road projects in Malawi.
1.7 Structure of the DissertationThis paper has been structured in such a way that it has various chapters with particular
subheadings within them. The reason for this structuring is to enhance clarity of the
important issues discussed in the paper. These chapters are linked to one another and
should be read as such throughout this report.
Figure -1 below depicts the dissertation structure which will be followed in the
subsequent sections of the dissertation. This has been included to give the researcher
advance knowledge of the framework of the research.
Chapter 1 – Introduction1.1. Background
1.2. Problem statement
1.3. Justification for the research
1.4. Purpose of the study
1.5. Specific Objectives
1.6. Limitations of the study and areas for further research
1.7. Structure of the dissertation
Page 5
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Chapter 2 – Literature Review2.1 Summary of general theory
2.2Review of previous work
Chapter 3 – Research Design and Methodology3.1 Research philosophy
3.2 Research Approach
3.3 Research Strategies
3.4 Research Choice
3.5 Time Horizons
3.6 Techniques and Procedures
Chapter 4 – Data Analysis and Findings1.1. Questionnaire Administration
1.2. Data Entry and Analysis
1.3. Causes of Delayed Payments
1.4. Effects of Delayed Payments
1.5. Solutions to Delayed Payments
Chapter 5 – Summary, Conclusions, Discussion, and Recommendations
Figure -1 - Structure of Dissertation
Page 6
Student Identity Number: 1309308
CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 IntroductionThe following chapter critically reviews the existing literature related to the research
topic of delayed payments to road contractors undertaken by other researchers. A
literature review is an evaluative report of information found in the literature related to a
selected area of study (unknown, n.d). The concept map for the research formed a
guide in the literature review section of the research project. Refer to Figure 3 for the
research concept map.
The literature review was carried out through books, Project management and
engineering journals, conference papers, academic and masters theses, internet,
newspapers and books in order to identify factors which are responsible for causing
delays in making payments to road contractors and the effects the delayed payments
have on the contractors and the construction industry as a whole. The sources used are
secondary because of their ease to locate (Saunders, et al., 2009).
A wide range of studies on problems facing contractors in the construction industry have
been undertaken in several countries, with some researchers specifically tackling the
issue of delayed payments in the construction industry in their countries, emphasizing
that this challenge is not only in Malawi but spread throughout the world.
2.2 Main organisations involved in the road construction sector in MalawiTo ensure the understanding of the payment system in the road construction industry,
below is a summary of the brief roles of the main players in the industry:
1. The Roads Fund AdministrationThe Roads Fund Administration is a statutory organisation established by the Roads
Fund Administration Act of 2006 for purposes of raising, administering and accounting
for funds for the construction, maintenance and rehabilitation of public roads in Malawi
(RFA Act, 2006).
Page 7
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The organisation is responsible for making all payments to contractors for road works
and reports to the minister of finance. The sources of revenue for the Roads Fund
Administration are road tolls levied on international transit vehicles for using Malawi
Roads, fuel levy paid by all fuel buyers as a percentage of the fuel pump price, and
parliamentary appropriations through the national budget. The Roads Fund
Administration, together with the Roads Authority, as explained below, is the client in
the road construction projects in Malawi.
2. The Roads AuthorityThe Roads Authority (RA) is a statutory body which was formed in 2006 through an Act
of Parliament no.3 of 2006 as a direct result of the road sector reforms in Malawi as
highlighted above. Its function is to manage the road network in Malawi. The Roads
Authority reports to the ministry of Transport and Public Infrastructure.
Annually, the Roads Authority prepares an Annual National Roads Programme (ANRP),
and engages consultants and Works Contractors to carry out road works as outlined in
the ANRP. The Roads Authority is therefore the client in road construction projects
together with the RFA as above.
Approval for payment to road contractors for work done is by the Roads Authority itself,
and the payments are made by the Roads Fund Administration.
3. Road ContractorsThese are employed by the Roads Authority and are the executors of the road works
contracts and perform their work in line with the contractual agreements with Roads
Authority.
In Malawi, all contractors, including road contractors are regulated by the National
Construction Industry Council (NCIC), which categorises contractors into various
categories according to their experience and demonstrated capacity to carry out works
(NCIC, 2015). The experience is determined by the number and size of works contracts
Page 8
Student Identity Number: 1309308
executed over a specified period of time. The Road contractors prepare certificates for
payment for work done.
4. ConsultantsThese, like the contractors enter into contract with the Roads Authority to act and
represent fully the Roads Authority, and to administer the construction contract and
ensure its full compliance by the road contractors. Just like contractors, the consultants
are paid for the work they do on behalf of Roads Authority.
Consultants are involved in the payment process of contractors by certifying the work
done by contractors including the quantities being claimed by the contractors.
Figure 2below illustrates the various players involved in the payment chain of certificates
for road contractors. It is important to note that the positioning of the organizations in the
chain is not a hierarchy and does not in any way represent the importance of the
organizations, but rather the stages at which the organisations are involved in the
payment process.
Figure 2- Players involved in payment of certificate
Page 9
Contractor
Consultant
Roads Authority
Roads Fund Administration
Student Identity Number: 1309308
2.3 Successful project executionFor a project to be executed successfully there is need among many things to
effectively allocate and use the available resources (Munns & Bjeirmi, 1996). Almost all
project resources, including human, machinery, materials etc., depend on the
availability of cash.
According to Cantoria, 2011, managing cash flow in construction projects is a vital
aspect of project management’s implementation plan. Without proper cashflow,
implementing a project would be a challenge. According to Al-Joburi et al., 2012, cash
flow impacts every aspect of construction projects’ implementation process and cash
shortages can lead to project failure and business bankruptcy. In Ghana, studies
indicate that delayed payments to contractors contribute to poor cashflow forecasting on
the part of Ghanaian road contractors, thus affecting successful implementation of road
projects (Amoako, 2011). This challenge is still prevalent today, and even faces
Malawian Road contractors.
2.3.1 The delayed payment conceptImportant definitions pertaining to key research terminology has been included below:
1. Payment
As per the Oxford Dictionary, payment is defined as the action or process
of paying someone or something or of being paid.
2. Interim Payment
This is payment certificate issued before the final certificate payment.
Such payments are meant to assist contractors to overcome cash flow
problems and provide a source of self-financing in respect of their own
commitments to suppliers and sub-contractors (Deen, 2011).
3. Advance Payment
The sum paid to a contractor in advance before commencement of works
with the objective of helping the contractor to start up and finance the
contract without unnecessary external borrowing.
Page 10
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4. Late or delayed payment
This is defined as failure of a paymaster to pay within the period of
honouring of certificates as provided in the contract (Harris & McCaffer ,
2003)
5. Interest on delayed payment
This is interest paid to contractors calculated on contractor’s delayed
certificates meant for payment. According to the special conditions of
contracts between road contractors and the RA, this amount is calculated
as a percentage of the outstanding amount using the prevailing
commercial bank lending rates and is compounded on a monthly basis.
2.3.2 When does late payment occur?According to Roads Authority, (2012), the general conditions of contract for road
projects between the Roads Authority and all road contractors stipulate that payment of
certificate for road and related works to a contractor is within forty five (45) days from
the date it is passed on to the consultant by the contractor. Within these 45 days, the
certificate is supposed to change hands from consultant to Roads Authority who checks
and approves the certificate for payment and send it to the Roads Fund Administration
for eventual payment. If the certificate is not paid within the above stipulated 45 days,
then delay is deemed to have occurred in paying a contractor.
2.3.3 Contributing factors to delayed payments to road contractorsVarious literature reviewed identify several factors contributing to delay in making
payments to contractors.
According to Johnston, (1999), the problem of late payment, including non-payment is
experienced not only in developing countries, but even in the developed countries like
the United Kingdom. For example, a survey carried out to assess the payment
performance in Britain revealed that the construction industry is prone to late payment
culture, with payment of debts due to subcontractors and other suppliers, being paid, on
Page 11
Student Identity Number: 1309308
average, 53 days after tendering of invoices or application for payment (Johnston,
1999).
Malawian contractors have been faced with the same problem of delayed payments like
their international counterparts. According to Gara & Hawkins, (2014), as of 30 th June
2014, the government of Malawi owed contractors for carrying out various infrastructure
projects money in excess of USD56.2million, with some of these arrears spanning over
two years.
Their study revealed that the arrears (delayed payments) arose due to cashflow
challenges which came about due to the flowing factors:
a) Inability to provide funds envisaged in the budget
This arose due to failure to achieve levels of targeted revenue generation in the
budget. This is attributed to poor financial planning and budgetary provision for
projects.
b) Committing to expenditure beyond that provided for in the budget
Payments to road contractors sometimes exceed the budgeted funds due to
price escalations and interest charges on late payments thus eroding the
budgeted funds leading to delays in making payments.
c) Procedural weaknesses leading to failure to make payments
According to Laryea, (2010), payment problems to contractors in Ghana result from
cumbersome payment procedures, with the payment structure very beaurecratic and
complicated making release of payment such a big problem. In some cases the Ministry
of Finance asks contractors to account for previous monies paid before another
payment is made.
According to Alornyeku, 2011 , beauracracy is a type of formal administration with the
characteristics of division of labour, rules and regulation, hierarchy of authority,
impersonality of social relationships and technical competence, etc.
Page 12
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Although beauracracy was coined with an aim of ensuring that large organisations are
managed properly and are able to achieve efficiency and be accountable to people,
inefficiencies in the systems have made beauracracy an enemy of contractors and other
business players in industries. According to Max Weber bureaucracy is the ideal and
rational type of administration useful for achievement of positive results. However, he
notes the dysfunctions of bureaucracy due to excessive application of its guiding
principles by office holders, negatively imacting on on social and economic development
especially in poor countries.
According to Arab News, (2013), in Saudi Arabia, the causes of delayed payments to
contractors apart from beauracracy also include lack of compelling legislation to protect
contractors from clients who delay payments. The system in Saudi Arabia requires
contractors to implement projects as long as the contract has been signed, even if the
payments are delayed. This does not empower the contractor to force client to make
timely payments through abandonment of work since will be deemed to have failed the
contract and be sued for damages.
Research done by Ali et al.(n.d), found that one of the factors which contribute to late
payment to contractors is the economic conditions especially during economic crisis.
Economic conditions have an impact on the client’s cashflow impacting on the ability to
make payments, thus delaying payments to contractors.
According to Ngwaluko, (2013), contractors are faced with problems of payment due to
the use of manual payment system. Manual payment system is slow as it involves
personnel moving files between offices and any delay by one person affects the whole
payment chain.
In Sri Lanka, grafts were found to be one of the factors contributing to delays in making
payments to contractors. The issue of graft is deep rooted in the construction industry
and contractors are its main victim to an extent that in some extreme cases, no positive
response can be obtained by a contractor from client without a graft (National
Construction Association of Sri Lanka, n.d)
Page 13
Student Identity Number: 1309308
According to Donkor,( 2011), the following factors contribute to delays in making
payments to contractors for donor funded projects in Ghana:
Lack of proper feasibility studies into the availability of finance to complete a
project.
Variations are made on project without taking serious consideration of its
financial implication.
The number of signatures that must be appended to the documents.
Late preparation of certificates
Inability to provide funds, due to poor budgetary allocation and mismanagement
of funds
Late variation of valuations
Inaccuarate bills of quantities
Slow coordination and seeking of approval from concerned authorities
Delay in work apprpoval
Lack of communication
Poor contract management
Liaison problems among contracting parties’
Client’s cashflow problems
Bribe paid before certificate is signed
Inadequate supporting documents
All these factors will be assessed via a survey to determine if they also contribute to
delayed payments to Road Contractors in Malawi.
2.3.4 The effects of delayed payments to road contractorsLiterature reviewed pertaining to the effects of delayed payments to contractors
revealed a wide range of impacts from financial to socio-economic challenges. Ten
main effects were identified from the literature reviewed.
Delayed payments to contractors affect the performance of contractors, with others not
being able to complete the projects in time resulting into project delays (Judi & Rashid,
2010). Muhwezi et al., (2014), consider delay in making payments by the client as
Page 14
Student Identity Number: 1309308
critical and is one of the greatest factors which contribute to delays in completing
projects.
According to Latham, (1994), delayed payments to contractors will not only cause
delays in completing projects but also has the potential effect of forcing contractors out
of business and getting bankrupt. In America, the bankruptcy of Truland, a large
electrical contractor was attributed to delayed payments to the contractor by the main
client of the project(Sernovitz, 2014).
Apart from the contractors themselves, other parties who are connected to the
contractors in one way or another also suffer because payment delays to the
contractors. According to Obeidat, (2014), delayed payments to road contractors in
Jordan has led to contractors to be unable to pay their obligations to banks and the
salaries of their employees. This is similar in Ghana, where studies on effects of
delayed payments to contractors revealed that late Payment will cause severe cash flow
problems especially to contractors, and this would have a devastating secondary effect
down the contractual payment chain(Amoako, 2011).
The other effect of delayed payments to contractors is reputation damage to contractors
due to delayed completion of works or abandonment of works due to the delayed
payments which impacts on their cashflow and ability to perform their work(Gara &
Hawkins, 2014).
The construction industry is also faced with disputes between clients and contractors
with various factors contributinng to this, one being the issue of delayed payments. This
leads to high advesrary between client and contractor and leads to negative effects on
the project success(Muhamid, 2014).
Apart from the reputation damage identified above, Gara & Hawkins, (2014), in their
report of assessing public arrears and liabilites generated from contracts in the Road
Sector in Malawi, they identified a number of other impacts of delayed payments to road
contracors in Malawi as listed below:
1. Create Financial Hardship to contractors
Page 15
Student Identity Number: 1309308
2. Create Negative Chain Effect on other Parties
3. Create Cash Flow Problems
4. Cost overrun
5. Result in Delay in Completion of Projects
6. Lead to Bankruptcy or Liquidation
7. Lead to Abandonment of Projects
8. Result in Formal Dispute Resolution e.g. Litigation/Arbitration
9. Create Negative Social Impacts
These impacts of delayed payments are in tandem with what other studies studies in
countries outside Malawi found and the research will seek to establish if these
impacts/effects are still relevant to the Malawian road contractors.
2.3.4.1 Solutions to the problem of delayed payments to road contractorsAccording to Prism, (2013), acknowledgement is made that delayed payments is a norm
in every line of business but recognises that the construction industry is unique due to
its complex nature of contracting and sub contracting, as such there is need to have
legislation to give guidance on payments to contractors. This, it is argued should help
to bring fairness to both parties because in the absence of legislation to enforce
payment, the only beneficiary is the entity withholding the payment as it reduces its
need for bank financing.
Coordination is another critical element to ensure payment delays are eliminated.
Clients, Consultants and Contractors should consider the project as their own and
should coordinate effectively to ensure smooth flow of communication among the
contracting parties(Donkor, 2011).
Adoption of e-payment system in the construction industry is another solution to
expedite payments to road contractors. According to Mdala, 2013, automation of the
payment system is imperative to improve the flow of payments in the Road Sector.
Page 16
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Charging interest on delayed payments is another option available to the contractor.
Accroding to Huse, (2002), charging interest on delayed payments will act as an
incentive to the clients to make timely payments to contractors since interest charges
apart from affecting client’s cashflow, they also are an expense and increases the
client’s expenditure beyond his budget.
Studies undertaken by Zou, (2006), revaled that in order to combat corruption in the
construction sector, “there is need to strengthen the management of the construction
market through development of laws and regulations, and development of a transparent
work process as well as providing ethical and technical education to the related
personnel”.
2.3.5 Conceptual frameworkFigure 3 below shows a concept map depicted as a pictorial summary model of how the
theories and literature relate to the research. The figure depicts the key factors to be
studied i.e. the causes and effects of delayed payments and the solutions to the
delayed payments.
Page 17
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Figure 3- Research Concept Map
Page 18
Student Identity Number: 1309308
CHAPTER 3 – Research Design
3.1 IntroductionThis chapter deals with the research design employed in undertaking the research
project. When planning for any undertaking, it is imperative to properly set out a plan in
order to ensure that its execution is carried out in an orderly and logical manner. The
plan or design acts as a framework upon which the whole undertaking is carried out
from start to finish.
To ensure important elements of the research are not missed out, (Tosey & Saunders,
2012), propose that the researcher should use the research onion as depicted in Figure 4
below.
Figure 4- Research “Onion” as adopted from (Tosey &Saunders, 2012)
Page 19
Student Identity Number: 1309308
By following the research onion from its outermost layer to the innermost layer, the
research design was systematically followed as outlined in the below sub headlines.
3.1.1 Research PhilosophyThe first layer of the research onion depicts the research philosophies which can be
adopted for carrying out research. Saunders et al., 2009, identifies two main
philosophical perspectives for business research as positivism and interpretivism.
According to Williams, 2011, the basis of positivism philosophy is the highly structured
methodology to enable generalization and quantifiable observations and evaluate the
result with the help of statistical methods, while the interpretive philosophy believes that
the social world of management and business is too complex as to be formulated in
theories and laws such as in the natural science. According to Johnson & Christensen,
2012, with the interpretive philosophy, there are many truths to a simple fact and these
are relevant for every situation and research problem.
For the purposes of this research, the philosophy which was adopted is interpretivism.
This philosophy was chosen because the researcher believes that there are many truths
to the research questions relating to delayed payments to road contractors and the
effects this has on them supported by the fact that different players have different
perspectives to the same situation.
According to Saunders et al., (2007), “the most important determinant of the research
philosophy adopted is the research question with one approach better than the other in
answering particular research questions”.
3.1.2 Research ApproachFrom the research onion, the second layer outlines the different approaches available to
the researcher to choose from when conducting research. For this paper, the selected
approach is deductive because there is already a theory from which the researcher will
move from when carrying out the analysis of data collected.
Page 20
Student Identity Number: 1309308
3.1.3 Research StrategiesDue to the need to collect data from different sources in the construction industry, the
research combines two strategies which are important to produce the most relevant
data for conducting the research. These strategies are survey and case study and have
been explained in the sub sections below.
3.1.3.1 Case StudyFor the research, two organisations have been chosen as the case study institutions
and these are:
1. The Roads Fund Administration
2. The Roads Authority.
These two organisations are very significant for the research for the role they play in the
payment process to road contractors as highlighted in in chapter 2.
3.1.3.2 SurveySurvey research was adopted for the list of contractors and consultants. Surveys are
used to obtain up to date information on public opinion to various topics. According to
Saunders et al., 2009, surveys, as a data collection method, are popular because they
allow large amounts of data to be collected in a cost effective manner.
3.1.4 Research ChoiceThe research onion’s fourth layer outlines various research choices available to the
researcher when carrying out research. The researcher shall use mixed methods to
ensure both numeric and non-numeric data is captured for use in quantitative and
qualitative analysis.
3.1.5 Time HorizonsDue to the limited available time within which to carry out the research, cross sectional
time horizon will be adopted. According to Saunders, et al., 2009, a cross sectional time
Page 21
Student Identity Number: 1309308
horiszon looks at a snapshot of events at a particular time, while as a longitudinal time
horizon looks at a series of events over a long period of time.
As can be seen in Figure 7, the research was conducted by following a plan which was
largely based upon the limited time available as per the University of Bolton Time Table.
3.1.6 Techniques and ProceduresThe research employed the use of interviews and questionnaires for data collection for
the research. Refer to appendices section for sample questionnaire (Appendix 1) and
interview excerpts (Appendix 2 and Appendix 3).
3.1.6.1 Sample Size for Road ContractorsThe total list of road contractors who had been awarded contracts by the Roads
Authority in the first half of the financial year beginning 1 July 2014 was obtained from
the Roads Authority. The list included civil contractors in all the categories of contractors
as specified by the National Construction Industry Council. The total for the population
was 105.
The research concentrated only on these current financial year contractors other than
all the registered contractors with the National Construction Industry Council because
these were the proven active contractors at the time of starting the research and thus
were deemed more relevant to the research considering that they can be traced and
accessed easily to meet the limited time available for the research.
A determination of the sample size was made using published tables from Research
Advisor from the link http://research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm. According to
Israel, (1992), another way of determining sample size is to rely on published tables
which provide a sample size for a given set of criteria.
For the road contractors, the following variables applied when calculating the sample
size:
Page 22
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Population size = 105
Confidence level = 95%
Margin of Error = 5%
The required minimum sample size is 83. Refer to Table 3 for the sample size
calculations.
Determination of the actual respondents to be selected for purposes of administering
questionnaires was made using simple random sampling. The total list of the road
contractors obtained (population), was tabulated on an excel worksheet and given
numbers from 1 to 105, and using Microsoft Excel random function, “=RAND ()”, 83
contractors were selected.
3.1.6.2 Sample Size for Roads Fund Administration Purposive, non-probability sampling was used to select the sample in this case study
organisation. This is because not every employee in the organisation is involved in the
processing of contractor certificate payment and thus not all employees would have
knowledge of factors that contribute to delayed payments to contractors or the impact
this has to the contractors.
In total, the key personnel involved in the processing of contractor certificates for
payment were eleven (11). This includes 3 engineers who work as technical auditors
and eight accountants. Thus the total population for the Roads Fund Administration for
the research is 11.
The Sample Size for the Roads Fund Administration, using the published tables as
explained above gave a sample size of 11, where
Population size = 11
Confidence level = 95%
Margin of Error = 5%
Refer to Table 3 for the sample size calculations.
Page 23
Student Identity Number: 1309308
3.1.6.3 Sample Size from Roads Authority Just like with the Roads Fund Administration, non-probability sampling was used to
select the sample. Emphasis was placed on the engineers who are involved in the
payment process, and these totalled 14. Using the published table as per Table 3, at
confidence level of 95% and Margin of error of 5%, this gives a sample size of 14.We
selected all the 14 engineers and sent them questionnaires to respond.
3.1.6.4 ConsultantsThe total list of active consultants who were engaged by the Roads Authority in the first
half of the financial year beginning 1 July 2014 was obtained and these in total were 7.
We limited our population to only these active consultants due to challenges of
accessibility for those consultants who are not active. This was intended to ensure that
accessing them is easier considering the limited time available for conducting the
research and reporting the results thereof.
Using the published table as in depicted in Table 3, the total sample size for consultants at
confidence level of 95% and margin of error of 5% is 7.All the 7 consultants were
selected and questionnaires were administered to them.
Below is the summary of the sample sizes for each target of respondents for the survey
Target Respondent Sample SizeRoad Contractors 83Roads Fund Administration 11Roads Authority 14Consultants 7
Table 2 - Summary of Sample Sizes
3.1.7 Research EthicsResearch ethics are paramount whenever carrying out any research as there are
always issues of ethics and morals that need to be considered. Of great concern to the
Page 24
Student Identity Number: 1309308
participants of any research is the confidentiality of their identity as well as unauthorized
use of information provided for the research, just to name a few.
For the purpose of this research, the University Of Bolton Code Of Practice for Ethical
Standards in Research involving Human Participants was complied with. At the
beginning, before commencing with the research, a research ethics checklist was
completed and this was submitted to the University together with the Topic choice form.
Page 25
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Table 3- Sample Size Calculation Worksheet
Page 26
Student Identity Number: 1309308
CHAPTER 4 - DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONThis chapter deals with data collection for the research and explains how the methods
and procedures mentioned in chapter 3 were practically used in the data collection.
Further, the chapter addresses the subject of data analysis for the collected data and
lastly how the results of the analysis were interpreted.
The research employed both quantitative and qualitative techniques to analyse the
numerous multifaceted numeric and non-numeric collected data. Microsoft Excel was
used to carry out the data analysis owing to the simplicity of the application to analyse
data to suit the requirements of the research.
4.1 Data CollectionThe data for the research was sourced through questionnaires, literature studies of
reports from Roads Authority and Roads Fund Administration, Contract documents,
other government documents and the internet relating to the construction industry and
interviews with various personnel in the sector.
For the collected data to be meaningful, it must be converted into a form that makes
sense to the readers of the research report because in its raw form, data is
meaningless. This therefore requires that data collected is analysed and interpreted to
provide answers to the research questions and address the research objectives.
4.1.1 Questionnaire AdministrationQuestionnaires were administered to all the four categories of respondents, i.e.
contractors, Roads Authority, Roads Fund Administration and Consultants.
The questionnaire contained 4 sections. Section 1 was for general information while
sections 1 to 3 addressed the research questions and specific research objectives as
explained in chapter 1. Specifically, the questionnaire was structured as follows:
1. Section 1 –General information
Page 27
Student Identity Number: 1309308
2. Section 2 - Causes of delayed payments
3. Section 3 – Effects of delayed payments
4. Section 4 - Solutions to delayed payments
The questionnaire was designed to carter for both quantitative and qualitative data
collection. For the quantitative section, structured questions with prelisted answers were
asked to the respondents and the respondents were required to rank their responses on
a scale of 1 to 5 with the scales standing for the following as in table below:
1 = Very Low 2 = Low 3 = Medium 4 = High 5 = Very High
Table 4 - Scale of questionnaire responses
After the quantitative questions in each section, there followed qualitative questions
whereby respondents were asked to provide their own explanations to the issues in the
questionnaire, over and above the prelisted answers provided in relation to the
questions asked. This was intended to capture data not captured in the quantitative
sections and also to get more explanations to the quantitative questions asked. A
sample questionnaire has been included in appendix 1.
The questionnaires were administered to all the categories of respondents as below:
1. Road ContractorsFrom the sample of 83 contractors, questionnaires were sent to all the 83 contractors
via email and physical delivery as a hard copy. Out of these 83 contractors, a total of 40
contractors responded to the questionnaire and the remaining 43 did not do so even
after following up with them and sending reminders. The total questionnaires responded
to represents a response rate of 72% of the total sample size of contractors chosen for
the research.
2. Roads Fund AdministrationFrom the sample of 11 RFA employees, a total of 11 questionnaires were sent to them
via email and manual delivery. All the 11 respondents retuned the questionnaires,
representing a 100% response rate.
Page 28
Student Identity Number: 1309308
3. Roads AuthorityElectronically and manually, questionnaires were sent to all the 14 selected engineers
at Roads Authority. Out of these 14 questionnaires, only 10 were returned. This
represents a 71% response rate.
4. ConsultantsAs is similar with the other respondents, questionnaires were sent electronically and
manually to all the 7 consultants in the sample and all of them returned the
questionnaires, representing a 100% response rate.
To ensure all the target respondents to whom questionnaires were sent are
remembered, an excel worksheet was opened where all the target respondents to
whom questionnaires were sent were recorded. The excel worksheet contained the
names of the respondents, their email address, contact telephone numbers and
physical address, the status of questionnaires sent i.e. returned or not returned. This
ensured all questionnaires were tracked. Upon being returned by the respondents, the
questionnaires were filed to safeguard them from being lost.
4.1.2 Interview with RA and RFA employeesThe other technique involved interviewing employees of Roads Authority and Roads
Fund Administration, being the main players in the payment process of certificates as
explained in chapter two. Meetings were booked with four people, two from each
organisation and confirmation was only received from two people, each from RA and
RFA and these were finally interviewed.
The interview took the form of asking the interviewees questions along the lines of the
research objectives in order to uncover more into the causes and effects of delayed
payments beyond what can be captured via questionnaires. Excerpts of the interview
were recorded on paper and have been included in the appendices section. Refer to
Appendix 2 and Appendix 3.
Page 29
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2 Data AnalysisThe quantitative data collected from the various respondent categories was analysed by
following the below steps:
1. All the questionnaires collected from respondents were grouped into their
categories according to the type of respondent i.e. contractors, consultants,
Roads Authority and Roads Fund Administration. After this grouping, each
questionnaire was given a code to ensure that it is unique and that once it has
been entered into the excel worksheet, it should not be entered again to avoid
duplicating data for the analysis and thus getting wrong results for the research.
The contractor’s questionnaires were given codes from contractor 1 to contractor
50. The consultant’s questionnaires were given codes from Consultant 1 to
Consultant 7. Similarly for the Roads Fund Administration questionnaires, these
were coded from RFA 1 to RFA 11, and the Roads Authority questionnaires were
coded from RA1 to RA 10.
2. After the first step, a worksheet in excel was created for data entry. All the data
from the questionnaires collected was entered into this excel worksheet to
establish the number of responses for each section of the questionnaire from the
different respondent categories. The questions required responses on a range of
1 to 5, where the range represented ranking from very low to Very high as
explained in Table 4 above.
3. To ensure data was correctly entered, the excel function of data validation was
used and a range of 1 to 5 was set as the valid data to ensure that any number
outside this range entered mistakenly into the worksheet should be rejected to
avoid inputting wrong data as depicted in Figure 5below. A prompt giving
notification of rejection of entry would come out automatically if any number
outside the validation limits was entered by mistake. Once a questionnaire was
entered, it was uniquely marked by stamping with a specially made stamp
marked with the words “analysed” and safely filed to ensure that it is not
mistakenly entered again.
Page 30
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4. After the data had been entered onto excel, the analysis took the form of
populating the number of responses for each score .i.e. very low, low, medium,
high and very high, for each category of respondent in order to establish how
many of the respondents had given a particular value to the same question. An
excel function of “=countif ()” was used to undertake this exercise to ensure that
all data had responses are considered owing to the many questionnaires
collected. To act as control, the total number of responses for each particular
field was summed up by adding these values derived above. This was done
using the excel operation of “=sum ()”.As an example, see Figure 5for the analysis
of data entered for contractors when analysing the causes of delayed payments.
5. After obtaining the scores as in 5 above, they were further analysed as a
percentage of total responses derived in 5 above and graphs were plotted to
depict a visual outlook of the responses for each category of respondents in
order to get meaning from the data analysed. Refer to Figure 6 below for an
illustration of how data was manipulated.
6. Considering that the research respondents are in different categories, a weighted
average of the responses in each category was derived using the average
formula in excel for each category of respondents. The formula for the average
used is as follows: “=Average(A1:A5)”, where “A1:A5” represent the range of
percentage responses for each of the variables, very low to very high. A single
graph for the weighted averages was plotted to come up with a general pattern of
all respondents considered together using the law of whole numbers. The graphs
will be analysed in terms of how skewed they are about the neutral axis, and
conclusions drawn from thereon and recommendations accordingly made.
The qualitative data from the interviews was analysed by developing themes
from the narratives provided during the interview by the interviewees.
Page 31
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Figure 5- Data Entry for received questionnaires
Page 32
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Figure 6 : Illustration of part of excel worksheet depicting how data was manipulated
Page 33
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1 Causes Of delayed PaymentsAn analysis of the causes of delayed payments have been analysed according to each
category of respondent i.e. Contractors, Roads Fund Administration, Roads Authority
and Consultants. Different respondents placed different amounts of importance to the
causes of delayed payments, in some cases showing similar results. The results of the
analysis have been included in the subsequent subheadings.
4.2.1.1 Causes of delayed payments - Road ContractorsA survey of the causes of delayed payments to road contractors revealed the following
factors as the causes of delayed payments as depicted in Graph 1. The results clearly
indicate that contractors consider all the factors in the questionnaire to contribute to
delayed payment of certificates for work done, albeit with different importance placed to
each factor as below.
Lack of adequate funds on the part of client was considered the major cause of delayed
payments by road contactors. One hundred percent (100%) of the respondents ranked
delayed payments as a having a very high impact on delaying certificate payments for
work done, with Eighty Five percent (85%) of them ranking it very high and fifteen
percent (15%) ranking it high.
This was followed by bureaucracy and red tape in the payment system. One 100% of
respondents ranked the factor as significant, with fifty seven percent (57%) ranking it as
very high and forty three percent ranking it as high.
The other factors followed in the following descending order:
Ninety Five percent (95%) of the respondents ranked the use of manual
payment system as a contributor to delayed payments, with the
respondents splitting between forty seven and half percent each ranking
the factor between high and very high.
Ninety two and half percent (92.5%) ranked inaccurate bills of quantities
and/or disagreement on the valuation of works done between high and
Page 34
Student Identity Number: 1309308
very high as contributing to delays in making timely payments to
contractors. Fifty percent of all the contractors rated the factor as high and
forty two and half percent (42.5%) rated it very high.
In total, seventy five (75%) of contractors ranked corruption in the system
between high and very high in contributing to payment delays. Forty five
percent (45%) rated it high and thirty five percent (35%) rated it very high.
Seventy five percent (75%) of contractors ranked poor relationship
between contractor and the client between high and very high at fifty five
percent (55%) and twenty percent (20%) respectively.
Seventy percent (70%) of contractors ranked political affiliation of
contractor between high and very high in contributing to payment delays.
From this 70%, fifty two and half percent (52.5%) ranked the factor it high
and seventeen and half percent (17.5%) ranked it very high.
Fifty five percent (55%) of respondent contractors ranked delay in
submitting contractor’s payment claim between high and very high in
contributing to payment delays to road contractors. The 55% was made up
of fifty two and half percent (high) and two and half percent (very high).
Lastly, eighty five percent of contractors ranked variations in the original
contract e.g. Changes in designs and scope of contracts between medium
and high in contributing to payment delays. Forty two and half percent
(42.5%) ranked the factor as medium and the other forty two and half
percent (42.5%) ranked the factor as high.
Page 35
Student Identity Number: 1309308
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F90%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Causes of Delayed Payments - ContractorsPe
rcen
tage
Res
pons
es
Graph 1- Causes of delayed payments (Contractors’ perspective).
FI Corruption in the system
F2 Lack of adequate funds on the part of client
F3 Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system
F4 Variations in the original contract
F5 Poor relationship between contractor and the client
F6 Inaccurate bills of quantities
F7 Political affiliation of contractor
F8 Use of manual payment system
F9 Delay in submitting contractor’s payment claim
Key 1 - Legend to Graph 1
Page 36
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1.2 Causes of delayed payments – Roads Fund AdministrationAnalysis of delayed payments from questionnaires administered to Roads Fund
Administration revealed that delayed payments are majorly caused by lack of funds on
the part of client and Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system. These factors were
each given a score of One hundred percent (100%) i.e. all respondents ranked them as
very high contributing factors.
Other factors were also agreed to cause delays to payment of certificates and these
have been included below in descending order in terms of importance by the Roads
Fund Administration.
All respondents ranked inaccurate bills of quantities and/or Disagreement on the
valuation of works done between high and very high, with forty five percent (45%)
ranking the factor as high and fifty five percent (55%) ranking the factor as very
high.
All respondents ranked the use of manual payment system between high and
very high in contributing to delayed payments. Thirty Six percent (36%) of the
respondents rated the factor as high whilst sixty four of the respondents rated the
factor as very high.
Eighty two percent (82%) of respondents ranked delay in submitting contractor’s
payment claim between high and very high in contributing to payment delay to
contractors.
Eighty two percent of respondents (82%) ranked poor relationship between
contractor and the client as contributing to delays in making payment to
contractor
Fifty Five (55%) of respondents ranked corruption in the system between high
and very high as causing delays in making timely payments to road contracts
Fifty four percent (54%) of road contractors, with high and very high sharing
twenty seven percent (27%) each, attributed the political affiliation of contractors
as causing delays in making contribution to delayed payments.
Page 37
Student Identity Number: 1309308
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F90.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
Causes of Delayed Payments - RFA
Resp
onse
Rat
e
Graph 2 - Causes of delayed payments (RFA’s perspective).
FI Corruption in the system
F2 Lack of adequate funds on the part of client
F3 Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system
F4 Variations in the original contract
F5 Poor relationship between contractor and the client
F6 Inaccurate bills of quantities
F7 Political affiliation of contractor
F8 Use of manual payment system
F9 Delay in submitting contractor’s payment claim
Key 2 - Legend to Graph 2
Page 38
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1.3 Causes of delayed payments – Roads AuthorityAnalysis of factors causing payment delays from questionnaires administered to Roads
Authority revealed the following that Roads Authority regard lack of adequate funds on
the part of client being the greatest cause of delay in making timely payments to
contractor with 100% of the respondents ranking the factor as very high.
Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system came second in the rankings by Roads
Authority, with 100% of the respondents raking the factor between high and very high,
broken down as sixty percent (60%) high and forty percent (40%) very high.
The other factors produced the following rankings in descending order:
Ninety percent (90%) of respondents ranked inaccurate bills of quantities and/or
disagreement on the valuation of works done between high and very high in
contributing payment delays to road contractors.
Ninety percent (90%) of respondents from the Roads Authority ranked variations
in the original contract e.g. Changes in designs and scope of contracts between
high and very high in contributing to payment delays, with 60% ranking it as high
and 30% ranking it as very high.
Eighty percent (80%) of RA respondents ranked delay in submitting contractor’s
payment claim between high and very high in causing payment delays, with thirty
percent (30%) ranking the factor as high and fifty percent (50%) ranking the
factor as very high.
Eighty percent (80%) of Roads Authority respondents ranked Use of manual
payment system between high and very high in causing payment delays, with
thirty percent (30%) ranking it as high and fifty percent (50%) ranking it as very
high factor.
Fifty percent (50%) of RA respondents ranked Political affiliation of contractor
between high and very high in causing delays in payments to road contractors,
with forty percent (40%) ranking the factor as high and ten percent (10%) ranking
it as very high.
Page 39
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The following two factors did not get prominence amongst the respondents
contributing to delayed payments:
Poor relationship between contractor and the client, with only thirty percent (30%)
respondents rating as high, whilst the other portion was ranked as 30% medium
and 40% ranked it between low and very low in causing payment delays.
Roads Authority did not also rank corruption in the system as great contributor to
delayed payments to road contractors with sixty percent (60%) of the
respondents ranking the factor between medium and very low.
Page 40
Student Identity Number: 1309308
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F90%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Causes of Delayed Payments - RA
Perc
enta
ge R
espo
nses
Graph 3 - Causes of delayed payments (RA’s perspective).
FI Corruption in the system
F2 Lack of adequate funds on the part of client
F3 Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system
F4 Variations in the original contract
F5 Poor relationship between contractor and the client
F6 Inaccurate bills of quantities
F7 Political affiliation of contractor
F8 Use of manual payment system
F9 Delay in submitting contractor’s payment claim
Key 3 - Legend to Graph 3
Page 41
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1.4 Causes of delayed payments – ConsultantsAnalysis of causes of delayed payments amongst respondents drawn from consultants
revealed that consultants ranked lack of adequate funds on the part of client, and
bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system are the leading causes of delayed payments
to road contractors in Malawi with all the respondents unanimously agreeing to these
factors.
The following factors were also considered to be significant by the consultants in
contributing to delayed payments and have been explained below in descending order:
One hundred percent of consultants ranked Poor relationship between contractor
and the client between high and very high in contributing to delayed projects, with
forty three percent (43%) of these ranking it as high and fifty seven percent
(57%) of them ranking it as very high.
One hundred percent (100%) of the consultants ranked delay in submitting
contractor’s payment claim between high and very high in contributing to
payment delays to contractors, with forty three percent (43%) of these ranking
the factor as high and fifty seven percent (57%) ranking it as very high.
Use of manual payment system was also ranked as one of the major causes of
payment delays. Eighty percent of consultants ranked it between high and very
high, with forty three percent (43%) as high and fifty seven percent (57%) as very
high.
Eighty six percent of respondents ranked variations in the original contract
between high and very high in causing payment delays. This ranking is made up
of forty three percent (43%) high and forty three percent (43%) very high.
Forty three percent of consultants ranked corruption in the system as having a
very high significance in causing payment delays, and 29% ranked it as high and
the other 29% ranked it as medium.
The analysis also revealed that consultants do not place much significance on the
following factors as contributing to delays in making payments to contractors:
Page 42
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Political affiliation of contractor, with only fourteen percent (14%) of the
consultants ranking it as high, whilst seventy one (71%) ranked it as medium
and fifteen percent (15%) ranked it as low.
The consultants also did not highly rank poor relationship between contractor and
the client as a major cause of delayed payments to contractors. Only 29% rated
in as high whilst 71% rated it as medium.
Page 43
Student Identity Number: 1309308
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F90%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Causes of Delayed Payments (Consultants)Re
spon
se R
ate
Graph 4- Causes of delayed payments (Consultants’ perspective).
FI Corruption in the system
F2 Lack of adequate funds on the part of client
F3 Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the system
F4 Variations in the original contract
F5 Poor relationship between contractor and the client
F6 Inaccurate bills of quantities
F7 Political affiliation of contractor
F8 Use of manual payment system
F9 Delay in submitting contractor’s payment claim
Key 4 - Legend to Graph 4
Page 44
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1.5 Causes of delayed payments – All respondentsThe analysis of causes of delayed payments amongst the four categories of
respondents, considered in totality provided the following results as depicted in Graph
5below.
Very Low Low Medium High Very High0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
CONT
Causes of Delayed Payments
perc
enta
ge R
espo
nses
Graph 5 - Causes of delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents)
Overall, all the respondents agree with the assertions of causes of delayed payments
included in the research questionnaire. The majority of the responses for all
respondents ranged between medium and very high as follows:
Road contractors, 34% very high, 45% high and 29% medium;
Consultants had 49% very high, 29% high, and 21% medium;
Roads Fund Administration had 55% very high, 26% high and 18% medium, and
lastly;
Roads Authority had 36% very high, 38% high and 19% medium.
Page 45
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.1.6 Summary of the causes of delayed paymentsThe comments from the qualitative section of the questionnaire provided by
respondents provided more information into the causes of delayed payments as
described below:
1. Lack of adequate funding on the part of clientIt was revealed that the client for the roads, Roads Fund Administration has funding
challenges due to the over reliance on fuel levy to fund road projects. The money that is
funded in the national budget at times is not fully made available during the financial
year. It was also established from the responses that this lack of adequate funding is
exacerbated by politicizing road projects. “Don’t pretend like you don’t stay in Malawi.
You see, our politicians are the ones contributing to the poor development of this
country. A president can decide today and make a directive on a podium during a
political rally that a road project should start in an area, without consulting anybody on
the availability of funds or even the economic viability of the road. This presents
problems of payments to contractors when work starts since there are no budgeted
funds for such road projects”. Extracted from excerpts of interview with Head of
Finance, Roads Fund Administration. See Appendix 3 for the full excerpts of the interview.
This lack of adequate funding on the part of client contributes to delayed payments
because at the time of applying for payment by contractors, it is often found that the
client has no money to pay contractors for work done. The most contractors to suffer
are those undertaking big projects requiring huge sums of money, and in the event of
limited available funds, these are often side stepped during payments and priority is
given to smaller contractors carrying out smaller projects.
Another reason established which has contributed to lack of adequate funds on the part
of the client is the intermittent flow of cash budgeted for the road sector. Road levy
charged on fuel purchases takes long to be remitted to the Roads Fund Administration
by the Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority (MERA), the organisation which collects the
levy on behalf of RFA. Money budgeted for road development projects via the National
Page 46
Student Identity Number: 1309308
budget is not immediately available and comes in bits and pieces, affecting availability
of funds to pay contractors. This has an effect on timely payment of road contractors.
The interviews also revealed that the revenue sources for the road fund are very few
and contributes to inadequate funds on the part of client. See Appendix 2.
2. Bureaucracy and red Tape in the systemMost respondents agreed to bureaucracy and red tape in the system as being one of
the major causes of delayed payments to road contractors. These results were
corroborated with interviews carried out with the respondents. “There are many, but I
can’t explain all of them because of time. But prominent ones include duplication of
work by RFA and RA. The same work performed by RA is performed again by RFA,
except for the payment. Technical auditors of RFA go to inspect road projects, an
activity which is also done by RA engineers and inspectors”. Extracted from excerpts of
interview with HoF, RFA. See Appendix 3.
From the comments provided by respondents in the questionnaires, it was revealed that
once a certificate has been prepared by a contractor, it passes through seven offices
before payment is finally made. From the contractor, the certificate is passed on to a
consultant who checks and certifies the work done by the contractor. The contractor
then routes the certificate to Roads Authority, where the project engineer authorizes the
certificate after comparing the certificate with work done on the ground. The project
engineer then routes the certificate to the regional engineer, who authorizes the
certificate for payment by Roads Fund Administration after satisfying himself with the
certificate.
After the certificate has reached the Roads Fund Administration, it goes to the technical
auditors, who are engineers by profession. These technical auditors check the
correctness of the certificate by checking the rates used by the contractor in the
certificate claim and also the quantities of completed work being claimed. The certificate
is then compared to the physical work carried out which is established via physical
verifications conducted periodically by the technical auditors to ensure certificate is
Page 47
Student Identity Number: 1309308
being claimed for work done. After certification by technical auditors, the certificate is
sent to the head of audit who also conducts a check of the certificate.
After being checked by the head of audit, the certificate goes to the senior accountant
who prepares a payment voucher which is authorised by the head of finance and finally
payment is made. This whole process takes weeks to complete at the expense of a
contractor waiting for the much needed cash to meet costs of the project.
3. Disagreements on the valuation of work doneThe research revealed that there are often disagreements between contractor and
consultant including the client, RA and RFA, on the valuation of work done. Often times,
it is found that the contractor overstates the value of work of done, and sometimes he
may even use incorrect rates in order to claim huge amounts from the certificate. This
leads to delays in payment to the contractor since there is back and forth tossing of the
certificate between the parties involved in the payment process and this leads to delays
in processing the certificate and eventually delays payment to the contractor. See
Appendix 2: Excerpts of Interview with Roads Authority Senior Engineer
It was also established that the disagreements arise due to lack of adequate
documentation to support the certificate claim by the contractor. See Appendix 2.This
presents problems to the client when reviewing the certificate, resulting in delays in
payment since the supporting documentation is asked to be provided before the
certificate starts to be processed.
Sometimes, it happens that a certificate passes through the consultant and the Roads
Authority, but when it reaches the Roads Fund Administration, issues may be
discovered pertaining to the valuation of works, and the certificate is sent back to Roads
Authority to resolve with Consultant and Contractor. This entails the payment process
starting all over, thus contributing to delay in making payment.
4. Corruption in the system
Page 48
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The comments from the respondents also revealed that contractors, often times
encounter cases of bribery whereby people involved in the payment, having knowledge
that contractors often rely on timely payment of certificates to have a healthy cashflow,
ask for bribes in order to speed up the certificate payment. This practice goes to worst
cases where client deliberately overlooks paying a certificate or tries to find fault with a
certificate in order to get a bribe to process the certificate. “It is also alleged that there is
corruption in the payment chain, more especially at the RA and RFA stages. Some
contractors have complained of being extorted to pay money in order that their
certificates are processed timely”. Excerpts from interview with the Senior Engineer,
Roads Authority. See Appendix 2. Different respondents placed different importance to
corruption as a causative factor of delayed payments, with contractors ranking it highest
of all the respondent groups and Roads Authority and Roads Fund administration
ranking it lowly. Refer to Graphs 1 – 4. This is not surprising bearing in mind that the
contractors are the victims of the malpractice.
5. Poor relationship between contractor and clientSurvey results collaborated with interviews of contractors revealed that bad blood
between contractor and client results in delays in processing contractor certificate for
payment. Sometimes there is bad blood between client employees and a contractor and
this may get too personal to an extent that the client deliberately delays the certificate to
make a point to the contractor that he has power over the contractor and can pull the
strings.
6. Variations and change of scope of worksContract variations and change of scope in road works contracts is a normal occurrence
due to such factors as change in designs due to unforeseen circumstances. When
variations take place, more especially where the scope of work has increased, a
contractor is not paid outright for the extra work done and is required to make the claim
on the final certificate. This results in the contractor being not paid timely for work done.
7. Political affiliation of contractor
Page 49
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Contractors of all the respondent categories attributed the political affiliation as a factor
in causing payment delays. Comments from the contractors revealed that politicians
usually have an influence over the activities of the Roads Fund Administration and the
Roads Authority since these are public bodies.
Sometimes these politicians influence how payments are conducted with the client. For
example, where a contractor is affiliated to an opposition party and provides financial
support to opposition parties, politicians in government sometimes direct the client to
delay payment in order to antagonize the financial muscle of the contractor so that he
does not fund rivals. This leads to payment delays. As a converse, those contractors
who have political connections may find their way to get their certificates paid timely.
Refer to interview with RFA HoF on Appendix 3.
8. Use of Manual Payment SystemThe payment system in the road construction industry is manual and not electronic.
Contractors prepare the certificate and print a manual which is sent physically to the
consultant. The consultant checks the certificate, and writes a letter of recommendation
to Roads Authority for the contractor to be paid. This letter is printed and together with
the contractor certificate is delivered physically to Roads Authority. Once in the hands of
Roads Authority, the certificate is checked, and necessary approvals are done and
covering letter is written, printed and signed and delivered physically to Roads Fund
Administration.
At the Roads Fund administration, when the certificate is received, it is checked and
approved for payment. In some cases cheques are written for contractors and in other
cases, a bank letter is written with a list of contractors and amounts to be paid. This
letter is physically taken to the bank for payment processing.
There is so manual involvement in the certificate processing to its eventual payment
and this causes payment delays.
9. Delay in submitting contractor’s payment claim
Page 50
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Contractors have a role to play in the timely processing of certificates, as the analysis of
respondents has revealed. Information from the Roads Fund Administration, Roads
Authority and Consultants emphasize that contractors delay in submitting certificate for
payment. Where there are limited funds, the demand for payment amongst competing
contractors is high, and if a contractor delays in making a claim, by the time he submits
a certificate, all the money may have already been paid to other contractors. This is
because all the money for the roads is put in one account, the road fund account, and
payment to contractors is dependent on availability of money in the account. In times of
funds shortage, apart from prioritizing contractors, payment is made on first come first
paid basis, since the client cannot wait for certificates which have not been made.
Page 51
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2 Effects of Delayed PaymentsThe following subheadings discuss the effects of payments as revealed by the analysis
of responses from respondents who attended to the questionnaires.
4.2.2.1 Effects of Delayed Payments – Road ContractorsAnalysis of effects of delayed payments to contractors from the questionnaires
administered to road contractors revealed that contractors consider all the effects
included in the assertions to be the effects of delayed payments. See Graph 6 below for
the results of the analysis.
The analysis revealed the following levels of importance placed to the effects by the
contractors and have been listed below in descending order:
100% of contractors ranked tarnishing image of contractor between high and
very high as being the effect of delayed payments. 60% of responses ranked the
effect as very high and the remaining 40% ranked it as high.
100% of contractors ranked the creation of chain reaction on other parties in the
supply chain between high and very high. 55% of respondents ranked it very high
and the remaining 45% ranked it as high.
98% of contractors ranked “reduced project profitability to the contractor due to
cost overruns” as an important effect, with 68% ranking it as very high and 30%
ranking it high.
97% of contractors ranked “Cashflow problems for the contractor” as an
important effect due to delayed payments. This was represented by 80% of
contractors ranking it as very high effect and 17% of contractors ranking it as
high.
96% of contractors ranked “Delays in completing projects” between high and very
high as an effect emanating from delayed payments. Of these, 66% ranked it
very high and 33% ranked it as high.
95% of contractors ranked “negative social impacts “between high and very high
as an effect arising from delayed payments, with 43% ranking it very high and
52% ranking it high.
Page 52
Student Identity Number: 1309308
92% of contractors ranked “loss of potential business” between high and very
high as an effect arising from delayed payments, with 75% ranking it as very high
and 17% ranking it high.
Suspension of works has been ranked between high and very high by 80% of
contractors as an effect arising from delayed payments, with 48% ranking it as
very high and 32% ranking it as high
bankruptcy or liquidation has been ranked between high and very high by 80% of
contractors as an effect of delayed payments, with 48% ranking it as very high
and 32% ranking it as high
78% of contractors rank “Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future
business opportunities” between high and very high, as a an effect resulting from
delayed payments, with 45% ranking it as very high and 33% ranking it as high.
Page 53
Student Identity Number: 1309308
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E100%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Effects of Delayed Payments - ContractorsPe
rcen
tage
Res
pons
es
Graph 6- Effects of delayed payments (Road Contractors’ perspective).
E1 Delays in completing projects E2 Reduced project profitability to the contractorE3 Cashflow problems for the contractorE4 Leads to bankruptcy or liquidationE5 Creates a chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain
E6 Leads to suspension and/or abandonment of works
E7 Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future business opportunities
E8 Loss of potential business due to spending a lot of time with one clientE9 Results in negative social impacts due to delayed completion of projects E10 Tarnishes the image of the contractor
Key 5 - Legend to Graph 6
Page 54
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2.2 Effects of delayed payments – ConsultantsThe analysis of effects of delayed payments amongst the consultants revealed the
following from the perspective of consultants. The effects have been listed below in
descending order of importance.
100% of Consultants ranked as very high, reduced project profitability and
cashflow problems for the contractor as major effects arising from delayed
payments to contractors.
100% of consultants rank between high and very high, “delays in completing
projects”, as an effect of delayed payments arising from delayed payments. 71%
of these ranked the effect as very high and 29% ranked it as high.
100% of consultants ranked “negative social impacts” between high and very
high as effect of delayed payments. From these, 57% ranked it as very high and
43% ranked it as high.
Suspension of works had 100% of consultants ranking it between high and very
high. 57% ranked it as high and 43% ranked it as very high as an effect of
delayed payments to contractors.
86% of consultants ranked “creation of chain reaction to other parties in the
supply chain” as an important effect from delayed payments. Of this 86%, 57%
ranked it as very high and 29% ranked it as high.
71% ranked bankruptcy and loss of potential business as important effects
arising from delayed payments, with 29% ranking the effects as very high and
41% ranking them as high.
Finally, only 29% of consultants consider poor relationship with client as a high
effect arising from delayed payments. 57% consider it medium and the other
14% consider it low.
Page 55
Student Identity Number: 1309308
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Effects of Delayed Payments - ConsultantsP
erce
ntag
e R
espo
nses
Graph 7 - Effects of delayed payments (Consultant’s).
E1 Delays in completing projects E2 Reduced project profitability to the contractorE3 Cashflow problems for the contractorE4 Leads to bankruptcy or liquidationE5 Creates a chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain
E6 Leads to suspension and/or abandonment of works
E7 Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future business opportunities
E8 Loss of potential business due to spending a lot of time with one clientE9 Results in negative social impacts due to delayed completion of projects E10 Tarnishes the image of the contractor
Key 6 - Legend to Graph 7
Page 56
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2.3 Effects of Delayed Payments – Roads Authority The effects of delayed payments analysed from roads authority responses revealed the
importance of effects of delayed payments from Roads Authority perspective as
depicted in Graph 8. These have been presented in descending order in the following
bullet points;
All RA employees to whom questionnaires were administered and responded,
identified “delays in completing projects” as the main effect of delayed payments.
All the respondents ranked their responses as very high.
100% of the Roads Authority respondents ranked as very high, “cash flow
problems to contractor “, as an effect arising from payment delays.
Negative social impacts was ranked by 100% of RA employees as an effect of
delayed payments with 70% ranking the effect as very high and 30% ranking it as
high.
Tarnishing image of contractor was ranked by 100% of respondents between
high and very high as an effect arising from payment delays. 70% ranked the
effect as very high and 30% ranked it as high.
Reduced project profitability was ranked by 100% of RA employees as an effect
arising from delayed payments, with 50% ranking it as very high and the other
50% ranking it as high.
Bankruptcy and liquidation received 90% of RA responses between high and
very high as arising from delayed payments. 70% ranked the impact as very high
and 20% ranked it as high.
Suspension and abandonment of works received 90% of responses between
high and very high from the Roads Authority. 50% ranked the impact as very high
and 40% ranked it as high.
Loss of potential business received 60% of the responses between high and very
high, with 20% ranking the impact as very high and the 40% ranking it as high.
Poor relationship with client received 50% of the responses between high and
very high with 10% ranking the impact as very high and the 40% ranking it as
high.
Page 57
Student Identity Number: 1309308
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Effects of Delayed Payments - RAP
erce
ntag
e R
espo
nses
Graph 8 - Effects of delayed payments (RA’s perspective).
E1 Delays in completing projects E2 Reduced project profitability to the contractorE3 Cashflow problems for the contractorE4 Leads to bankruptcy or liquidationE5 Creates a chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain
E6 Leads to suspension and/or abandonment of works
E7 Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future business opportunities
E8 Loss of potential business due to spending a lot of time with one clientE9 Results in negative social impacts due to delayed completion of projects E10 Tarnishes the image of the contractor
Key 7 - Legend to Graph 8
Page 58
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2.4 Effects of Delayed Payments – Roads Fund AdministrationThe effects of delayed payments analysed from Roads Fund Administration’s responses
revealed the importance of the effects of delayed payments from Roads Fund
Administration’s perspective as depicted in Graph 9. These have been presented in
descending order in the following bullet points;
Cashflow problems for the contractor was ranked by 100% of the respondents as
very high;
Reduced project profitability to the contractor was ranked by 100% of
respondents between high and very high as an effect arising from delayed
payments. 73% of these respondents ranked the impact as very high and the
other 27% raked it as high.
Delays in completing projects was ranked by 100% of respondents between high
and very high, with 64% ranking it as very high and 36% raking it as high.
Negative social impacts was ranked by 100% of respondents between high and
very high with 55% raking it as very high and 45% ranking it as high.
Chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain was ranked by 91% of
respondents between high and very high, with 64% ranking it as very high and
27% ranking it as high,
Loss of potential business was ranked by 91% of respondents between high and
very high, with 55% ranking it as very high and 36% ranking it as low.
Bankruptcy or liquidation was ranked by 82% of respondents between high and
very high, with 27% ranking it as very high and 55% ranking it as high.
The two effects below were not ranked highly by Roads Fund administration as being
significant:
Suspension and/or abandonment of works was ranked by 100% of respondents
between medium and high, with 55% ranking it as medium and 45% ranking it as
high.
Poor relationship with client was ranked by 100% of respondents between low
and high, with 9% of respondents ranking it as low, 46% ranking it as medium
and 45% ranking it as high.
Page 59
Student Identity Number: 1309308
E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Effects of Delayed Payments - RFA
Per
cent
age
Res
pons
es
Graph 9 - Effects of delayed payments (RFA’s perspective).
E1 Delays in completing projects E2 Reduced project profitability to the contractorE3 Cashflow problems for the contractorE4 Leads to bankruptcy or liquidationE5 Creates a chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain
E6 Leads to suspension and/or abandonment of works
E7 Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future business opportunities
E8 Loss of potential business due to spending a lot of time with one clientE9 Results in negative social impacts due to delayed completion of projects E10 Tarnishes the image of the contractor
Key 8 - Legend to Graph 9
Page 60
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2.5 Effects Delayed Payments – all respondentsThe results of the analysis of all responses taken in totality for all respondents revealed
a positive affirmation to the research assertions of the effects of delayed payments as
included in the research questionnaire as depicted in Graph 10 below.
Very Low Low Medium High Very High0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Effects of Delayed Payments - All respondents
Perc
enta
ge re
spon
ses
Graph 10 - Effects of delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents)
Significantly, all responses considered together for each respondent ranked the effects
(impact) of delayed payments between high and very high impact as explained below:
Road contractor responses ranked all the effects towards high and very high with
these values getting 33% and 58% weights respectively. 9% of the responses
were between very low and medium impact.
Consultants responses were 51% very high, 34% high and 14% between very
low and medium
Roads Authority responses were 57% very high, 32% high, and 11% between
very low and medium
Roads Fund Administration responses were 47% very high, 35% high and 17%
between very low and medium.
Page 61
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.2.6 Summary of findings of the effects of delayed paymentsThis section summarises the effects of delayed payments after considering the
responses from questionnaires and the interviews with RA and RFA employees. The
research has revealed that effects of delayed payments are experienced in the industry
as explained in the following subheadings:
1 Delays in completing projects The information gathered from all respondents revealed that delayed payments
contribute to delay in completion of projects. Most contractors revealed that many
projects in Malawi always experience time overruns due to the delayed payments to
contractors by clients. See Appendix 2: Excerpts of Interview with Roads Authority Senior
Engineer.
“Talking about effects, there are many. But of importance to the RA, and myself as
an engineer include project delays and sometimes suspension. When payment to
contractors delay, they stop working because they don’t have resources with which
to use in undertaking the project. Many road projects, such as Nkhotakota-Nsulira,
Bunda-Mitundu and Phalombe-Chiringa road have delayed to complete because of
the same issue”. Appendix 2
Since contractors remain illiquid, they have no means of buying materials, paying
employees and meeting other overhead costs, and impacts on projects completion.
2 Reduced project profitability to the contractor due to cost overrunsMost contractors who provided additional information to their questionnaires
revealed that due to delayed payments, the profitability of a project to the contractors
reduces drastically and in some cases totally wiped off resulting into making losses
by the contractors. This is so because delayed payments results in the contractors
spending a long time on the site and continue to incur overheads such as idle labour
payment etc.
Also, due to delayed payments, contractors resort to borrowing from banks and
other unchartered and informal lending individuals and suffer interest charges for the
Page 62
Student Identity Number: 1309308
sole reason that the work should not stop. This reduces their profits in their income
statement.
3 Cashflow problems for the contractorThe research also revealed that cashflow problems are caused by delayed
payments because most contractors, especially the small to medium sized ones do
not have the financial muscle to sustain the works in the event of delayed payments.
The payment delay thus heavily impact on their cashflow position and the balance
sheet is affected by creditors.According to interviews with RFA, “Ok. Let me see. There used to be many
construction companies in Malawi, most of them went out of business, not only due
to financial mismanagement, but also due to delayed payments”. See Appendix 3.
4 Leads to bankruptcy or liquidationIt was revealed during the research that delayed payments are one of the many
causes of failure of many contractor’s businesses, especially small and emerging
contractors who do not have a big asset base. Delayed payments clearly shake their
survival on the market and they resort to other modes of financing e.g. usury from
loan sharks in order to meet financial commitments for the contract. See Appendix 2
and Appendix 3, interviews with RA and RFA. In the end this totally wipe out their cash
and they are no longer liquid enough to sustain the business.
5 Creates a chain reaction on other parties in the supply chain Delayed payments have a secondary effect on the supply chain in the construction
project, affecting all the players in the construction. When payment delays, it creates
a vicious cycle in the supply chain since the contractor has obligations to pay other
people for goods and services rendered including suppliers and employees. Where
the contractor fails to pay, this also creates a chain reaction in the supply chains of
those other players. For example suppliers need to reorder stocks, pay creditors,
their employees etc. A negative effect on their customer, the contractor, also affects
them and their entire supply chain.
Page 63
Student Identity Number: 1309308
6 Leads to suspension and/or abandonment of works by the contractorInformation provided by respondents revealed that payment delays leads to suspension
and worst scenarios, abandonment of works. This is because a contractor relies on the
regular payment of interim certificate claims for him to perform the work. Where the
payments are not being done, a contractor is left with no cash resources and has no
choice but to abandon work until client is ready with funds. This is very common with big
projects involving huge capital outlays trickling into millions of Dollars. Respondents
cited such roads as Nkhotakota-Nsulira road, Bunda-Mithundu Road and Phalombe-
Chiradzulu-Chiringa Road, as projects which were abandoned due to delayed or non-
payment of contractor certificate claims. See Appendix 2.
7 Poor relationship with client resulting in loss of future business opportunitiesThe research also revealed from the information provided by the respondents that
delayed payments have the disastrous consequence of causing relationship breakdown
between contractor and client. Some contractors resort to other means of getting their
payment processed e.g. use of political connections to intimidate client, or using the
legal frameworks such as courts to sue the client for non-payment. The antagonism
created as result of this results in relationship breakdown between the client and
contractor, compromising future business opportunities for the contractor.
8 Loss of potential business due to spending a lot of time with one clientAs the old adage goes “time is money”, this is true for contractors engaged in
construction projects. The longer the time spent at a construction site not only reduces
the profitability of the contract but also leads to loss of potential business with other
clients who may many be in need of contractors whilst one is engaged with another
client. Most construction companies have limited number of employees who cannot be
committed to more than one project at once. Also, to get works, there is need for a
performance bond. The bond is inform of money or property valued at a certain sum,
and acts as guarantee that a contractor will perform the work. This money remains with
a bank until the contract is finished when it is released. Overspending time at a project
site means that this money still remains tied with a bank, until the project is finished.
Page 64
Student Identity Number: 1309308
This limits the contractor from bidding for other jobs until his money is released from the
performance bond.
9 Negative social impacts due to delayed completion of projects e.g. poor roads for the citizenry
Information sourced from the respondents revealed that delayed payments results in
negative social consequences to the society. Roads help people to easily access
markets, hospitals in order to access health care, and other social amenities. Delayed
projects make life difficult for the people targeted with the road project. According to
RFA HoF, “There are many other effects, including underdeveloped road network
leading to lack of access to markets for the local masses”. See Appendix 3
10 Tarnishes the image of the contractorThe research information gathered from respondents revealed that contractors’ image is
at risk of being tarnished in the event of projects delaying due to delayed payments.
This is very common in Malawi because people do not understand the relationship
between client and contractor in the road projects. In the event of project delays, people
always blame the contractor that he is delaying the project without knowing the source
of the problem. In severe cases, people have demonstrated against contractors carrying
out road projects and harassed their workers due project delays.
In some cases people have even petitioned the client, RA/RFA, to cancel contracts with
certain contractors due to road project delays. These stories are published in
newspapers and even aired on national and private radio stations and television
stations in the country. This negatively impacts on the image of the contractors, which is
a very important asset in business to win contracts with future clients.
Page 65
Student Identity Number: 1309308
4.2.3 Solutions to delayed PaymentsThe results of the analysis of all responses taken in totality for all respondents depicted
in Graph 11 below, reveal a positive affirmation to the assertions of solutions to delayed
payments included in the research questionnaire in Appendix 1.
The assertions made in the questionnaire to solve the problem of delayed payments are
listed below:
Charging interest payments on delayed payments
Legal action for delayed certificates
Cash flow planning by client
Reducing bureaucracy in the payment certificates
Adopting e-payment system
Enforcing an ethical culture in the payment system
Right to suspend work by the contractor
Improving coordination by all the contracting parties; consultants, contractors
and client
Improving capacity of contractor in preparing certificate claims
Very Low Low Medium High Very High0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Solutions to Delayed Payements - All respondents
Perc
enta
ge R
espo
nses
Graph 11 - Solutions to delayed payments to road contractors (all respondents)
Page 66
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The responses from the four categories of respondents largely ranged between high
and very high with the totals for the ranges at 85% for road contractors, 88% for
consultants, 73% for RFA and 83% for Roads Authority.
4.2.3.1 Summary of findings of the solutions to delayed paymentsThe following subheading explains the solutions to the problem of delayed payments
aided by the comments provided by respondents in the questionnaires and interviews
1. Charging interest payments on delayed payments All the respondents agreed that charging interest on delayed payments is
amongst the most viable solutions to ensure payments are made timely by the
client. Charging interest acts as punishment to the client, and compensation to
the contractor for delayed payments. Currently, the provisions of the contract
include a clause on charging interest for late payments. See Appendix 3,
excerpts of interview with HoF, RFA.
2. Legal action for delayed certificates Where certificates are delayed beyond reasonable time and due to factors perceived
to be related to poor relationships or political, some of the respondents suggested a
legal suit should be the remedy to the contractors in order to be paid timely. Some
contractors had reservations on the use of legal remedy to avoid breaking
relationships and compromising opportunities for future contracts with the client.
3. Cash flow planning by clientAll respondents pointed to the need for cashflow planning by client when starting
projects and engaging a contractor. It was suggested that proper feasibility studies
into availability of funds to undertake projects should be made. It was also
suggested that politicians should avoid starting projects for the sake of gaining
political mileage, without caring whether resources are available. Refer to Appendix 3:
Excerpts of Interview with Head of Finance for RFA
4. Reducing bureaucracy in the payment certificates
Page 67
Student Identity Number: 1309308
The respondents made suggestions that there should be reduction in duplication of
work in the payment process, more especially at the checking of certificate. There is
so much duplication of work between Roads Authority and Roads Fund
administration, and reducing this should help to mitigate payment delays. Refer to
Appendix 2 and Appendix 3.
5. Adopting e-payment system The respondents attributed payment delays to over use of manual processing of
payment in the construction sector. Adoption of e-payment system, where a
contractor can electronically log a certificate and all processes are done via
computer, should go a long way to mitigate payment delays. See Appendix 2.
6. Enforcing an ethical culture in the payment system Most of the respondents suggested that there is need for professionalism in the
construction sector and a code of ethics for the industry needs to be enforced by the
NCIC. All the other organisations should also develop codes of ethics to curb
malpractices such a graft. Refer to Appendix 3: Excerpts of Interview with Head of Finance for
RFA
7. Right to suspend work by the contractor The respondents suggested that the contractor should have the right to suspend
work where non-payment or delayed payments are being experienced from the
client. Currently, the conditions of contracts for road projects do not include delayed
payments as one which can lead to termination of contract.
8. Improving coordination by all the contracting partiesAll parties should work in tandem and should own the contract as their own. There
should be constant flow of information amongst all the parties to timely make
decision which affect payments. For example, Roads Fund should send timely
information to road contractors on impending holidays or activities which can affect
payments and require them to expedite preparation of certificates. Refer to appendix
2 and 3.
Page 68
Student Identity Number: 1309308
9. Improving capacity of contractor in preparing certificate claimsThe respondents agreed that one step towards curbing delayed payments is to
train contractors on how to raise a certificate as most contractors have problems
with the task and results in preparing incorrect certificates which often times are
sent back for correction, resulting into delays. Refer to appendix 2 and 3.
Page 69
Student Identity Number: 1309308
CHAPTER FIVE – CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis chapter summarises the findings from the last chapter and draws conclusions from
the same.
This research paper has investigated the causes and effects of delayed payments to
road contractors in Malawi for publicly funded road projects. From the results of the
study drawn from the primary research and supported by the literature reviewed, it can
be concluded that payments are a lifeline of the construction industry. Delays in
payments have disastrous consequences to contractors and the entire industry. It is
therefore imperative that critical importance should be put to payments to contractors to
avoid delays.
From the results of the research, it can also be concluded that the assertions in the
research questionnaire drawn from the literature review as to the causes and effects of
delayed payments have been confirmed by the primary research.
Further, the research identified solutions to resolve the problem of delayed payments.
Various recommendations have been suggested by the research respondents including
cashflow planning, reduced bureaucracy, charging interest on delayed payments,
adoption of e-payment, enforcement of ethical culture, improving coordination, and
improving capacity of contractor in certificate preparations. To ensure successful
integration of these recommendations, further recommendations have been proposed.
There is need for the Roads Fund Administration to increase its revenue base. Other
than relying on fuel levy and government appropriations, effort should be made to carry
out research on other potential revenue sources to ensure that there are adequate
funds for road projects which will ensure timely payments to contractors.
There is a need for collaborative partnership between Roads Fund Administration and
Roads Authority to ensure enhanced coordination to eradicate delayed payments to
road contractors. This can be achieved by constant communication and removal of any
Page 70
Student Identity Number: 1309308
rivalry in how they work and start seeing themselves as part of the contract. According
to HoF, RFA, the relationship between RFA and RA has left many contractors suffering
due to poor coordination and this has led to delayed payments. See Appendix 3: Excerpts of
Interview with Head of Finance for RFA. This is supported by Donkor, (2011) whp
recommends that Clients, Consultants and Contractors should consider the project as
their own and should coordinate effectively to ensure smooth flow of communication
among the contracting parties.
There is also a need for refinement of roles performed by Roads Fund administration
and Roads Authority to remove duplications and inefficiencies which contribute to
delayed payments such as physical verification of work by both organisations. A
functional review exercise of the roles of the two organisations should be carried out to
identify conflicting and duplicated roles in the payments process and streamline
activities to reduce bureaucracy. To effectively embrace the changes proposed by the
functional review, change management strategy should be incorporated in the two client
organisations, RA/RFA. In every organisation, people have an inherent fear of
embracing change for various reasons including fear of the unknown, fear of losing
status and position, fear of job loss etc. It is imperative that change management
techniques are employed in all organizations in the payment process.
It is also imperative that Continuous Improvement is employed in the road sector to
ensure that problems are continually addressed and strive to reach a stage of 100%
non-delayed payments by the Malawian road sector. This includes contractors
improving their certificate preparation skills.
Page 71
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Appendices
Figure 7 - Dissertation Work Plan
Page 72
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Appendix 1– Sample Research Questionnaire
RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIREDear Participant
I am Joseph Chembezi, collecting data from you which will be used in my dissertation as
part of my Masters in Project Management with the University of Bolton. The aim of the
research is to investigate the causes and effects of delayed payments to Road Contractors
in Malawi for public funded road projects, and to suggest solutions to resolve the problem.
The information you will be asked to provide will be used to help to provide insights to
achieve these objectives.
The questionnaire should take you about 15 minutes to complete. The information
provided will be treated in the strictest confidence as you will notice that you are not asked
to include your name and address anywhere on the questionnaire. The findings from your
questionnaire and others will be used as the main data set for my dissertation for my
masters’ course in Project Management at the University of Bolton. I hope you will find
completing the questionnaire enjoyable.
If you have any queries or would like further information, please feel free to contact me on
0999 930 189/0888 859 356 or email me on josephchembezi@yahoo.com
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
Page 1
Student Identity Number: 1309308
1) Which area in the construction industry supply chain are you in?
☐Contractor ☐Consultant ☐RA ☐RFA
2) How long have you been in the construction industry?
☐0-5 years ☐6-10 Years ☐11-20years ☐21years and above
3) Are you familiar with payment certificates for road projects?
☐Yes ☐No
4) Have you ever participated in any capacity in the processing/certification or any
issues of payment for road projects?
☐Yes ☐No
5) Are you aware or experienced any instance of a certificate for road project being
delayed for payment?
☐Yes ☐No
Page 2
Student Identity Number: 1309308
6) The following table lists down various factors which contribute to delayed payments
to road contractors for work done. Please rank these variables by significance by
ticking the relevant field.
Item Factor Very
Low
Low Medium High Very
High
1. Corruption in the system ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2. Lack of adequate funds on the part of
client
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3. Bureaucracy and Red Tape in the
system
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4. Variations in the original contract ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐5. Poor relationship between contractor
and the client
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
6. Inaccurate bills of quantities and/or
Disagreement on the valuation of works
done
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
7. Political affiliation of contractor ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
8. Use of manual payment system ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9. Delay in submitting contractor’s payment
claim
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
7) Any other factors which cause payment delays you wish to include:
I. …………………………………………………………………………………
………………
Page 3
Student Identity Number: 1309308
II. …………………………………………………
……………………………………………
III. …………………………………………………………………………………………
Page 4
Student Identity Number: 1309308
8) The following table lists down the impacts on contractors brought about as a result
of delayed payments. Please rank these variables by significance by ticking the
relevant field.
Item Factor Very
Low
Low Medium High Very
High
1. Delays in completing
projects
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2. Reduced project profitability
to the contractor due to cost
overruns
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3. Cashflow problems for the
contractor
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4. Leads to bankruptcy or
liquidation
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
5. Creates a chain reaction on
other parties in the supply
chain
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
6. Leads to suspension and/or
abandonment of works by
the contractor
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
7. Poor relationship with client
resulting in loss of future
business opportunities
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
8. Loss of potential business
due to spending a lot of time
with one client
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9. Results in negative social
impacts due to delayed
completion of projects
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Page 5
Student Identity Number: 1309308
10. Tarnishes the image of the
contractor
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9) Any other impacts of delayed payments to contractors you wish to include:
I. …………………………………………………………………………………………
………
II. …………………………………………………………………………………………
………
III. …………………………………………………………………………………………
………
Page 6
Student Identity Number: 1309308
10)The following table lists down mitigations to the problem of delayed payments.
Rank these solutions in terms of relevance.
Ite
m
Solution Very Low Low Medium High Very
High
1 Charging interest
payments on
delayed payments
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 Legal action for
delayed certificates
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
3 Cash flow planning
by client
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
4 Reducing
bureaucracy in the
payment certificates
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
5 Adopting e-payment
system
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
6 Enforcing an ethical
culture in the
payment system
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
7 Right to suspend
work by the
contractor
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
8 Improving
coordination by all
the contracting
parties; consultants,
contractors and
client
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9 Improving capacity
of contractor in
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Page 7
Student Identity Number: 1309308
preparing certificate
claims
11)Any other solutions to the problem of delayed payments to contractors you wish to
add:
I. …………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
II. …………….
…………………………………………………………………………………
III. …………………………………………………………………………………………
……
Page 8
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Appendix 2: Excerpts of Interview with Roads Authority Senior Engineer
INTERVIW WITH SENIOR ENGEINEER, ROADS AUTHORITYVenue : SE’s office
Interviewer : Researcher
Interviewee : SE
Date : 25th March 2015
Excepts
SE. Welcome Joseph. How is the research going on?
R. Thank you. Things are taking shape right now, although challenges are still there
more especially with getting contractors return questionnaires. But as time gets
closer, I believe I should receive most of the questionnaires.
SE. That’s wonderful to hear. It is normal when carrying out research to experience
challenges. That is part of the game. So, how may I help you? What information
are you looking for?
R. I have two main objectives which I would like to fulfil from the research: to find
causes of delayed payments to road contractors and the effects this brings to the
industry. I am also interested to find solutions to this problem. In short, I want you
to provide me with information along these research objectives.
SE. My friend, we can spend the whole day discussing this topic. This is a very wide
subject, but I will try to be specific to be in tune with the allocated time of 30
minutes for the interview.
R. Thank you sir. You may go on.
SE. Regarding causes, the major one is lack of enough funds by the RFA to pay
contractors. I am not sure why we have this, but this is really an issue. The
second factor is the long process that contractor’s certificate go through to get
paid. At first, before creation of RFA, all payments used to be made by National
Roads Authority, and things were moving efficiently.
Page 1
Student Identity Number: 1309308
R. I have noted that the causes mentioned all relate to the RFA. Does it mean that
the RA does not contribute to payment delays?
SE. Ha-hah! Do you want to misquote me my friend? Not that all problems are
caused by RFA. Even the RA and the contractors contribute to the delay in one
way or another. For example, RA sometimes forget to include supporting
documentation in the certificate forwarded to RFA for payment, and RFA holds
the certificate until all relevant documents are furnished. Sometimes the
contractors fail to raise a correct certificate, with many errors characterizing the
certificate claim. Sometimes one wonders if these errors are genuine, because
most of the times the errors always favour the contractor by over claiming on
work done. When these certificates are detected, they are sent back to the
contractor for correction, resulting in delays.
It is also alleged that there is corruption in the payment chain, more especially at
the RA and RFA stages. Some contractors have complained of being extorted to
pay money in order that their certificates are processed timely. Where a
contractor refuses to be corrupted, the client deliberately delays his certificate.
But these are just allegations without any proof.
R. How do you rank use of manual payment in the payment process as a contributor
of delayed payments?
SE. Joseph, you well know that in the modern day and age, computers have formed
the backbone of every activity including businesses. In the road sector payment
system, manual system has been in place since as far back as I can remember.
Everything about contractor’s payments is manual from the contractor up to
Roads Fund Administration. Yes, manual payment has an impact, but not as
high.
R. That is well understood. What about the effects of delayed payments?
SE. Talking about effects, there are many. But of importance to the RA, and myself
as an engineer include project delays and sometimes suspension. When
Page 2
Student Identity Number: 1309308
payment to contractors delay, they stop working because they don’t have
resources with which to use in undertaking the project. Many road projects, such
as Nkhotakota-Nsulira, Bunda-Mitundu and Phalombe-Chiringa road have
delayed to complete because of the same issue.
There have also been cases of some contractors facing financial hardships which
has led to some closing down.
R. As an engineer at RA, what measures can you propose to combat the problem of
delayed payments to contractors?
SE. As I already pointed out, the main issue with payments is lack of adequate funds
with RFA. The government and RFA should find means of raising more revenue
for road projects. Further to this, contractors should have experts who are
familiar with certificate processing to avoid errors.
I think my twenty minutes is up. We have to wind up. Lastly, RA and RFA
activities need to be aligned to remove duplicated roles. Otherwise, there is too
much duplication of roles mostly between RA engineers and RFA technical
auditors.
R. Thank you so much sir. It is true the 30 minutes is up. I really appreciate for
allowing me to meet you and have this interview despite your busy schedule.
May God bless you sir.
SE. It is my pleasure. Please make sure you share the results of your research to
me. Have a good day.
Page 3
Student Identity Number: 1309308
Appendix 3: Excerpts of Interview with Head of Finance for RFA
INTERVIEW WITH HEAD OF FINANCE, ROADS FUND ADMINISRTATIONVenue : HoF’s office
Interviewer : Researcher
Interviewee : HoF
Date : 26th March 2015
Excepts
R. Hello Sir, Good Morning.
HoF. Fine thanks, how are you? You can take a seat. How may I help you?
R. As you recall, I scheduled for an interview with you today in relation to the topic
of the research which I am carrying out.
HoF. Yes I remember, it’s just that this morning I have been busy, the CEO is looking
for some reports and I am supposed to furnish him by noon. By the way, remind
me, what is your research topic? You will forgive me, I read the email last week
and with age am becoming too forgetful.
R. The research is entitled investigation into causes and effects of delayed
payments to road contractors for publicly funded road projects. Basically, I am
interested to learn from you, being at the helm of payments to road contractors,
your experience regarding causes of payment delays and the impact this causes
to the contractors.
HoF. Hmmm! (clears throat). Young man, you must already know all the issues to do
with payments. You have been working with the RFA for six years. What I know,
you already know.
R. Correct sir, but you being directly involved in the payments, and also more senior
in the organisation, you should know issues much better than me.
HoF. Ha-ha! Ok. So where do we start?
Page 1
Student Identity Number: 1309308
R. Wherever you want sir, but I would be comfortable to follow a structured
approach, from causes and effects, to suggested solutions to resolve the
problems.
HoF. Ok. But I am only giving you 30 minutes for the interview as agreed. Don’t forget
I have reports to submit to the CEO. My friend, there are many causes to delayed
payments, but none can surpass the inadequate funds available to carry out
projects. Of the many reasons for this, apart from few revenue bases in addition
to the fuel levy, most projects are started without proper feasibility studies.
R. What do you mean sir when you say most projects commence without proper
feasibility studies?
HoF. Don’t pretend like you don’t stay in Malawi. You see, our politicians are the ones
contributing to the poor development of this country. A president would just make
a directive on a podium at a political rally that a road project should start in an
area, without consulting anybody on the availability of funds or even the
economic viability of the road. This presents problems of payments to contractors
when work starts since there are no budgeted funds for such road projects.
R. That is well understood sir, what could be the other contributing factors?
HoF. There are many, but I can’t explain all of them because of time. But prominent
ones include duplication of work by RFA and RA. The same work performed by
RA is performed again by RFA, except for the payment. Technical auditors of
RFA go to inspect road projects, an activity which is also done by RA engineers
and inspectors. In other words, the relationship between RFA and RA has
left many contractors suffering due to poor coordination and this has led to
delayed payments
Page 2
Student Identity Number: 1309308
During my stay in this organisation, I have also noticed that most contractors have
problems to make claims, and this results in errors. When detected, the
certificates are sent back for correction, delaying payment further.
R. Do you face political pressure when making payments?
HoF. Normally this happens when funds are limited and rationing for payments is
happening. Some politically connected contractors find their way to have
payments made in full. This disadvantages other contractors who would have
been paid had the politicians not exercised a hand.
R. In terms of politicians demanding that certain contractors are not paid?
HoF. This happens, but sporadically.
R. Sir, in the interest of time, would you quickly go to the effects of payment delays
to contractors.
HoF. Ok. Let me see. There used to be many construction companies in Malawi, most
of them went out of business, not only due to financial mismanagement, but also
due to delayed payments. Most of the contractors use borrowed money to
undertake projects, and if there are payment delays to them, it means the
creditors are also not paid timely, resulting in accumulation of interest on the
money borrowed. This forces the contractor out of business because it affects
their liquidity. The other effect is delay in completion of projects. What happens
when a contractor’s payment delays is that the contractor suspends work and
this results in the projects delaying.
There are many other effects, including underdeveloped road network leading to
lack of access to markets for the local masses; interest charged on delayed
payments puts a strain on the already limited road budget.
R. If you were to change things, what would you do to deal away with the problem
of delayed payments in line with the causes and effects already explained?
Page 3
Student Identity Number: 1309308
HoF. First and foremost, it is important to increase the revenue base of the Road
Fund. Currently, fuel levy and government funding via national budget are the
core sources of revenue and this is not adequate. It is important to think of how
to go beyond these two revenue sources in order to ensure availability of
adequate cash to pay contractors timely. It is also important …Ngrrrrr! (cell
phone rings, picks it up and hangs up). Am sorry, I will attend to that letter. How
far are we to finish? Ok, what I was saying is that there is need to streamline
activities of RA and RFA to remove inefficiencies and duplications which are
causing payment delays. The organisations can utilize work of consultants to
independently carry out a functional review of the activities of the two
organisations. By the way, I gave you twenty minutes and this is up. I have to
attend to office activities, otherwise I may get fired. Are you going to
accommodate me shelter at your house if am fired? Ha-ha! I am joking.
Currently, the contractors charge interest on delayed payments using the
applicable bank lending rate. This was designed to cover the contractors from
delayed payments.
In order to address concerns of corruption, codes of ethics in the various
organisations in the construction industry should be developed and implemented.
R. Sir, I would like to thank you for your time and the information provided and I
promise to provide you with a copy of the research report. I ask God to bless you.
Thank you.
HoF. Thank you. Make sure to use the information for academic use only. Have a
good day.
Page 4
Student Identity Number: 1309308
REFERENCES1. Ali, S. A., Smith, A. & Pitt, M., n.d. Contractor's Perception of Factors
Contributing to Project Delay:Case Studies of Commercial Projects in Klang
Valley, Malaysia. [Online]
Available at: http://fbe.um.edu.my/images/fab/Files/JDBEVOL7/vol7-04.pdf.
[Accessed 2014 August 2014].
2. Al-Joburi, K. I., Al-Aomar, R. & Bahri, M. E., 2012. Analyzing the Impact of
Negative Cash Flow on Construction Performance in the Dubai Area. Journal of
Management in Engineering, 28(4), pp. 382-390.
3. Alornyeku, F. K., 2011. THE IMPACT OF BUREAUCRACY ON PUBLIC
SERVICE DELIVERY: A STUDY OF KUMASI METROPOLITAN ASSEMBLY,
Kumasi: s.n.
4. Amoako, K. B., 2011. THE EFFECT OF DELAYED PAYMENT ON CASH FLOW
FORECASTING OF GHANAIAN ROAD CONTRACTORS, Accra: Institute of
Distance Learning, KNUST.
5. Analysis, P. E. a., 2013. The Need for Prompt Payment Legislation in the
Construction Industry, Markham: Reed Business Information.
6. Authority, R., n.d. Strategic Plan. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ra.org.mw/?page_id=15
[Accessed 8 February 2015].
7. Cantoria, C. S., 2011. Managing Cash Flow Control in Construction Projects.
[Online]
Available at: http://www.brighthubpm.com/monitoring-projects/114395-managing-
cash-flow-control-in-construction-projects/
[Accessed 13 2 2015].
8. Deen, H., 2011. The Significance of Interim Payments in Construction Contracts.
[Online]
Available at: http://harisdeen.com/blog/legal/the-significance-of-interim-
payments-in-a-construction-contract/
[Accessed 5 August 2014].
Page 1
Student Identity Number: 1309308
9. Delay, P., n.d. What is Payment Delay. [Online]
Available at: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-payment-delay.htm
[Accessed 3 August 2014].
10.Donkor, E. N., 2011. FACTORS AFFECTING DELAYED PAYMENTS ON
DONOR FUNDED ROAD PROJECTS IN GHANA, Accra: s.n.
11.Gara, S. & Hawkins, R., 2014. Assessment of public arrears including liabilities
generated from contracts in the road sector, Brussels: Alnetglobal.
12.Harris, F. & McCaffer , R., 2003. Modern Construction Management. UK:
Blackwell Science Inc.
13.Hunter, G. S., 2012. Abu Dhabi pledges to act over late payments to contractors.
[Online]
Available at: http://www.thenational.ae/business/industry-insights/property/abu-
dhabi-pledges-to-act-over-late-payments-to-contractors
[Accessed 8 February 2015].
14.Huse, J. A., 2002. Understanding and negotiating Turnkey and EPC Contracts.
2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
15. Israel, G. D., 1992. Determining Sample Size. Fact Sheet, November, p. 6.
16.Jacks, M., 2013. Africa’s 5 Best Performing Economies 201. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ventures-africa.com/2013/12/africas-5-best-performing-
economies-2013/
[Accessed 04 August 2014].
17.Johnson, B. & Christensen, L., 2012. Educational Research:Quantitative,
Qualitative and Mixed Mehtods. New York: SAGE.
18.Johnston, S., 1999. Debts and Interest in the Construction Industry - A Guide to
the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998. London: Thomas
Telford Limited.
19.Judi, S. S. & Rashid, R. A., 2010. Contractor’s Right Of Action For Late or Non-
Payment by the Employer. Journal of Surveying, Constructiuon & Property, 1(1).
20.Kamanga, M. J. & Steyn, W. J., 2013. Causes of delay in Road Construction
Projects in Malawi. JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTION OF
CIVIL ENGINEERING, 55(3), pp. 79-85.
Page 2
Student Identity Number: 1309308
21.Kwon, D. H., 2010. Project Management Contracts with Delayed Payments.
MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 12(4), pp. 692-
707.
22.Laryea, S. A., 2010. Challenges and opportunities facing contractors in Ghana.
Accra, University of Reading, pp. 215-226.
23.Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the Team – The Final Report of the Government
Industry Review of Procurement Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry,
London: HMSO.
24.Malawi, G. o., 2010. The Public SectorInvestment Programme(PSIP), Lilongwe:
Government of Malawi.
25.Mazengera, H., 2009. Road Maintanance Funds Governance - The Case of
Malawi. Kinshasa, Roads Fund Administration, p. 9.
26.Mazengera, H., 2009. Roads Fund Admnistration Annual Report, Lilongwe: RFA.
27.Mazengera, H., 2011. Performance of the Roads Fund Administration. Lilongwe,
Government of Malawi, pp. 2,3,4.
28.Mdala, M. E., 2013. Exploration of Information Flow and Payment of Funds in the
Road Sector Country: Malawi, Bolton: University of Bolton.
29.Muhamid, I., 2014. Micro and macro level of dispute causes in residential
building projects: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University -
Engineering Sciences, Volume 1.
30.Muhwezi, L., Acai, J. & Otim, G., 2014. An Assessment of Factors Casuing
Delays on Building Consruction Projects in Uganda. International Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, 3(1), pp. 13-23.
31.Munns, A. K. & Bjeirmi, B. F., 1996. The Role of project management in
achieveing project success. Internal Journal of Project Management, 14(2), pp.
81-87.
32.Mwanamvekha, J., 2011. Report on African Roads Maintanance Funds
Association SADC Focal Group Meeting, Mangochi: Roads Fund Administration.
33.National Construction Association of Sri Lanka, n.d. Report on Payment Delays
in Sri Lankan Construction Industry, s.l.: s.n.
34.NCIC, 2015. Registration. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ncic.mw/ncic/services/index.php?Page 3
Student Identity Number: 1309308
option=com_content&view=article&id=17&name=Registration&Itemid=93
[Accessed 24 March 2015].
35.Network, R., n.d. Road Network. [Online]
Available at: http://www.ra.org.mw/?page_id=21
[Accessed 16 March 2015].
36.News, A., 2013. Late payment to contractors stalling KSA projects. [Online]
Available at: http://www.arabnews.com/news/461523
[Accessed 03 August 2014].
37.Ngwaluko, M., 2013. Exploration of E-Payments in the Road Construction
Sector, Lilongwe: Likuni Press.
38.Obeidat, O., 2014. Small contractors grumble over gov't delayed payments.
[Online]
Available at: http://jordantimes.com/small-contractors-grumble-over-govt-
delayed-payments
[Accessed 10 February 2015].
39.Rahman, A. H. et al., 2006. Delay Mitigation in the Malaysian Construction
Industry. Journal of Construction, Engineering and management,, Volume 132,
pp. 125-133.
40.RFA Act, 2006. Roads Fund Administration Act. Zomba: Government Print.
41.Roads Authority, 2012. Roads And Bridge Maintananance Programme - Bidding
Document. 1 ed. Lilongwe: Roads Authority.
42.Robertson, D. C. & Maritz, M. J., 2012. What are the legal remedies available to
contractors and consultants to enforce payment?. Journal of the South African
Institution of Civil Engineering, Volume 2, pp. 27-35.
43.Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A., 2007. Research Methods for Business
Students. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Educatiin Limited.
44.Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business
Students. 5th ed. Essex: pearson Education.
45.Sernovitz, D. J., 2014. Army Corps delayed payments on Utah project tied to
Truland. [Online]
Available at:
http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/breaking_ground/2014/08/army-corps-Page 4
Student Identity Number: 1309308
delayed-payments-on-utah-project-tied.html?page=all
[Accessed 10 February 2015].
46.Tosey, P. & Saunders, M., 2012. The Layers of Research Design. Rapport, pp.
58-59.
47.unknown, n.d. Literature Review Tutorial. [Online]
Available at: libguides.library.cqu.edu.au/litreview
[Accessed 25 January 2015].
48.Vyas, S., 2013. CAUSES OF DELAY IN PROJECT CONSTRUCTION IN
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management
Studies, 1(2).
49.Williams, J., 2011. Dissertation Blog | Dissertation Writing Tips. [Online]
Available at: http://www.howtodo.dissertationhelpservice.com/research-
paradigm-and-philosophy
[Accessed 5 April 2015].
50.Works, M. o. T. a. P., n.d. Malawi: Publications. [Online]
Available at: http://www.malawi.gov.mw/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=9
[Accessed 19 January 2015].
51.Zou, P. X., 2006. Strategies for Minimizing Corruption in the Construction
Industry in China. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 11(2), pp. 16-
29.
Page 5