Post on 23-Feb-2016
description
transcript
ADEME Energy and Climate Visions
2030-2050
Eric Vidalenc – Economics and Foresight DepartmentADEME - French Agency for Environment and Energy
Management
• Objective of this morning session : • Focus on methods used to frame scenarios
(less on emphasizing the outcome of a given model or approach)
Example: ADEME Visions 2030 2050
• Context : work launched by the President of ADEME in 2012 (ADEME CEO F.Loos before the DNTE – National debate leaded in 2013)
• A collaborative exercise (a small coordination team and about sixty experts involved)
• Visions…and not scenarios (roadmap with political steps…) built on our core skills : renewable energies and energy efficiency.
• 4 tools/models used for quantification issues : • Technical : MEDPRO• Electrical system: EOD• Agriculture and land use : Mosut• Macroeconomic evaluation : 3ME
2
Objective and context
Visions 2030 2050 :A kind of tryptic
• A technical description (2012)
• A macroeconomic evaluation (2013)
• A social translation in the daily life of households (2014)
3
Two Visions Same scope…
• Energy consumption: buildings, transportation (but international air and maritime bunkers), agriculture and industry
• Renewable energy production …yet distinct perspectives
• 2030: current trends « + » a significant increase in energy efficiency and renewables : exploratory , « what if », foresight, positive method
• 2050: the 75%-decrease-target is set, then achievement conditions are identified : « how » to reach it, backcasting, normative method
• At last, there is an issue to identifie a possible gap between the two perspectives 4
Methodology Technical scenarios (model : MEDPRO, MOSUT, EOD)
1. Inventory of renewable resources and energy efficiency potential with sectoral experts2. Definition of a set of possibilities, with respect to technical and economic criteria (ROI identified)3. Identification of values and consistency checking4. Energy consumption and renewable energy production projections
Economic conditions and macroeconomic impacts
(model: THREEME)1. Identification of necessary price-signals2. Simulation of the macroeconomic impact
Social translation1. Identification of type of households to describe2. Quantification of all the daily actions in terms of energy
and CO2
5
Summary Distinct perspectives
• 2030: an ambitious yet realistic vision• 2050: a 75%-decrease (compared with 1990) in GHG emissions
Focus: energy (consumption and production) and GHG emissions
Key-messages• 2030: energy efficiency and the share of renewables could
increase significantly• 2050: the fourfold decrease in GHG emissions is achievable
with efficiency, renwables and some change in our habits and behaviour
Remarks• Sources of figures
2010: INSEE, CCTN, SOeS, CEREN 2030 - 2050: ADEME estimates (but exogeneous variables)
• Reference years: 2010 for energy; 1990 for GHG emissions
6
Main results
7
Energy
GHG emissions• -40% by 2030 • -75% by 2050
Exogeneous variables vs ADEME’s assumptions
Exogeneous variables
(*) henceforth « hh » ADEME’s assumptions
• Unit consumption: energy efficiency• Demand: organizational efficiency, non-disturbing
changes in ways of living (ex: miles/year/cap, number of TV sets/hh, etc.) 8
2010 2030 2050 References
Macro
Population (m) 62.9 68.5 74.1 INSEENumber of person/household (*) 2.3 2.17 2.05 INSEEBrent (US$2010/bbl) 78 135 230 IEAGDP (%/year) 1.8% CAS
Sectoral
New homes (m/year) 0.310
0.35 0.3 DGEC
Energy-intensive industrial output (t/year)
depends on the product DGEC
Share of nuclear power 77% 48% 18%-48%
2030 - Residential Urban planning: share of multi-family new buildings
increases (from 42% in 2010 to 50%) Thermal uses
• Energy-efficient retrofitting: 0.5 m homes/year• Comfort: unchanged, if not improved (e.g. air-conditioning)• Equipment
Heat-pumps (20% of space heating useful energy consumption), Thermodynamic water-heaters, solar water heaters (5% of hot
water useful energy consumption) Electrical appliances:
• Stock of conventional appliances (fridge, washing-machine, TV,etc.) as efficient in average in 2030 as today’s most efficient appliances
• Complementary electricity consumption (cell phone, IT’s, etc.) is constant (1,000kWh/year/household) 9
2030 – Residential - ResultsPer-use consumption Type of delivered
energy
10
2030 – Commercial and public services buildings
Organisation: floor area/employee is constant Thermal uses
• Building stock thermal performance and equipments are significantly improved
• Comfort is increased (50% of employee work in air-conditioned buildings)
Business-related electricity consumption • 10% decrease per employee by 2030 compared with 2010
Result: a 16% decrease in final energy consumption
11
Paradigm: constant individual mobility and modal split
Freight: a 20% increase in transported mass (tkm)
12
2030 – Transportation
2030 – Transportation Passenger transportation: emergence of mobility
services (account for 10% of intra-city passenger flows )
Results in terms of sales and stock :
13
2030 – Transportation - ResultsFinal energy consumption Type of energy
14
2030 – Industry Assumption: industrial recovery
• Energy-intensive products: pre-crisis (physical) output quantity is recovered, if not slighlty increased
• Other industries: grow roughly according to GDP growth Energy-efficiency: 20% in average (less than 1%/year)
15
Recycling (materials as well as heat losses) taken into account
Result: a 10% decrease in final energy consomption
16
2030 – Industry - Results
2030 – Food, forest and agriculture No-regret changes of habits
• A 2/3 decrease in food wastages• Current trends are protracted (e.g. decrease in meat
consumption) Energy efficiency: a 25% decrease in energy
consumption of agriculture buildings, 20% decrease use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers
Land management : land sealing pace is two-fold decreased, + 0,2 Mha of forest in 2030
Results : - 11% in livestock related impacts (CH4, N2O), and an low decrease in energy consumption
17
2030 – Energy production (1) Resources:
• Solid biomass and methanization are both significantly increased
• Land use competition is not exacerbated (3Mtoe of biofuels, compare to 2,4)
18
Renewable power• Wind: On-shore (34 GW) and off-shore (12 GW) • PV: 33 GW (very close to RTE New mix in terms of installed capacity but with 20% less on demand)
Remark: the load curve hourly matches power generation
19
2030 – Energy production (2)Focus on electrical system
2030 – Energy production - Results (3)
20
Result• Share of renewables: 35%• Share of renewable power:
46%
Evaluation of 2030 Vision
21
2050 – An overview Differences with the 2030 scenario
• The 75% decrease in GHG emissions is set as a target• Changes in ways of living allowed when convergence of
interests Buildings: energy efficient stock + reinforced
densification (stop of urban sprawling after 2030, and 50/50 between house
Transportation: mobility services develop (30% of urban flows) + GasVeh (of which 55% of biomethane) and electricity, 15% less of mobility/pers/year
Food and agriculture: French diet heads towards FAO’s recommendations
Tertiary : 20% decrease in surface area per employee Industry: 2010-2030 trends are protracted Results:
• Final energy consumption is two-fold decreased• 70% of renewables (final energy)
22
23
2050 – Food
24
2050 – Transportation
25
2050 – Transportation
2050 – Energy consumption
26
2050 – Renewables
N.B. concerning power generation, the share of renewable power ranges from 47% to 77%, according to the assumed share of nuclear power 27
Tools : 3ME, a multisectoral macroeconomic model (new Keynesian)
Method : Define a baseline - reference scenario, consider the technical assumptions
28
Macro Economic evaluationADEME – OFCE - TNO
• Energy balance• Signal-price /
Carbon tax• 325€/tCO2 in 2050• Total : 750€/tep in 2050(must be compared to the current implicit tax level : 243€t/CO2 on gasoline)
29
Investments
30
• GDP • Jobs
31
Concluding remarks Beyond energy and GHG
• NOx, SO2,PM2.5 and COVNM three-fold decreased by 2030• Likely (yet not quantified) reduction in other externatities :
• Transportation: noise, road casualties, congestion, health (cycling)• Buildings: thermal comfort• Food: meat-overconsumption-related deseases
Economics• An additional 300€/tCO2 price-signal is required by 2050 (in
ADEME scenario, not in absolute terms)• Macroeconomic impacts:
• Recessionary: increase in energy prices (loss of competitiveness) and decrease in conventional energy production
• Expansionary: decrease in fossil energy imports, increase in new business activities (renewables, high-quality building retrofitting)
• THREEME-based macroeconomic simulations show that the global impact on both GDP and employment is positive by 2050
32
• A description of the daily life and behaviour of 8 families in different context (age, children or not, localization, income…)
• 4 pages of narrative description and an energy balance (kWh and CO2) for each household compatible with the global ADEME vision 33
Social translation Just released
Attempt to conclude : Science for energy scenarios ?
• Scenario is a way (with differents tools) to look forward
• And if science is : • Rigorous and checkable method investigation• Open to criticism and discussions
• Probably Yes• But if science is :
• Reproductible … • Maybe not
• Because between two periods : we can see huge changes in knowledge, technologies (V2G, PtG…), values, belief, learning cost curve…
34