transcript
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Administrative Evaluation Committee Orientation Meeting Dr.
Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital
Development Mr. Stephen Foresi, Director of Human Capital
Development
- Slide 3
- Objectives Long Term To revise the Newington Public Schools
Administrative Evaluation and Professional learning Plan. Today
Define the purpose of the committee work, outlining short and long
term objectives. Provide a framework to outline the work. Provide
an overview of the current status of the Performance Evaluation
Advisory Council (PEAC). Provide an overview of summer tasks to
prepare for August 24, 2012 committee meeting. Answer any questions
or concerns you might have.
- Slide 4
- Purpose for the Work. Essential Question: How does leadership
develop and support teaching and learning as their highest
priority? Curriculum InstructionAssessment Instructional Leadership
Focus Connecticuts Leadership Standards Vision, Mission and Goals
Teaching and Learning Organizational Systems and Safety Families
and Stakeholders Ethics and Integrity The Educational System
- Slide 5
- Short Term Objectives to Get to Long Term Goals The Research
What does the research say about effective leadership practices?
Beliefs and Gaols What do we believe about leadership evaluation
and professional leaning? What are the goals for each? Defining
Effective Leadership Practices How can we define or make explicit
leadership practices for leaders in Newington Public Schools? Does
practice look different based on roles? Do we need to differentiate
based on roles? What does effective leadership look like in
practice? Defining Effective Practices for Professional Learning
for Leaders What systems need to be developed to support leaders
professional learning? What are effective practices in supporting
leaders growth? The Evaluation and Professional Learning Process
What process should be followed to evaluate leadership? How will
structured support be provided for leaders?
- Slide 6
- PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (PEAC)
- Slide 7
- CT Leadership Standards 10-5-11 Draft Vision, Mission, and
Goals: Education leaders ensure the success and achievement of all
students by guiding the development and implementation of a shared
vision of learning, a strong organizational mission, and high
expectations for student performance. Teaching and Learning:
Education leaders ensure the success and achievement of all
students by monitoring and continuously improving teaching and
learning. Organizational Systems and Safety: Education leaders
ensure the success and achievement of all students by managing
organizational systems and resources for a safe, high-performing
learning environment. Families and Stakeholders: Education leaders
ensure the success and achievement of all students by collaborating
with families and stakeholders to respond to diverse community
interests and needs and to mobilize community resources. Ethics and
Integrity: Education leaders ensure the success and achievement of
all students by being ethical and acting with integrity. The
Education System: Education leaders ensure the success and
achievement of all students and advocate for their students,
faculty and staff needs by influencing systems of political,
social, economic, legal, and cultural contexts affecting
education.
- Slide 8
- Centrality of Standards in Evaluation System PRINCIPALS
Multiple student learning measures 45% Teacher effectiveness
outcomes 5% Observations of principal performance and practice 40%
Staff, community, and/or student feedback surveys 10% Standard 2:
Teaching and Learning 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals 3:
Organizational Systems and Safety 4: Families and Stakeholders 5:
Ethics and Integrity 6: The Education System
- Slide 9
- Student Learning (45%) Half of the student learning element
based on the state test. Recommended Additional Guidelines: For
state test portion of student learning, weight growth measures more
heavily than attainment For locally developed measures, establish
approved set of options for districts to choose Recommended
Guidance from State: Provide guidance to districts to include
non-test measures of student graduation or grade progression for
secondary schools not demonstrating high graduation rates Provide
guidance around using local measures to extend grade levels and
subjects covered as possible
- Slide 10
- Teacher Effectiveness (5%) Opportunity for district innovation
Possible Measures: Growth in the percentage of teachers making
adequate growth in student achievement Differing strategies for
teachers at differing levels of effectiveness OR increased
retention of effective and highly effective teachers Principal
success in improving teachers effectiveness (though this can be
challenging to operationalize)
- Slide 11
- Principal Practice (40%) & Survey Feedback (10%) Based on
the six performance expectations in CT Leadership Standards Include
a focus on all practices around teacher quality and teacher
evaluation 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals 2: Teaching and Learning
3: Organizational Systems and Safety 4: Families and Stakeholders
5: Ethics and Integrity 6: The Education System 40%Observations of
principal performance and practice 10%Staff, community, and/or
student feedback surveys
- Slide 12
- Tools for Principal Practice Evaluation Connecticut Leadership
Standards Principal Practice Rubric School Observation Tools Staff,
Community, Student Surveys Non-Achievement School Data Including
clear examples of evidence 10%40%
- Slide 13
- Other Guidelines State model developed as default, with
rigorous process for local opt-out 4 rating levels Annual reviews
for all principals Evaluations that provide principals with useful
feedback and results linked to professional development Strong
training for evaluators A statewide committee (like PEAC) that
meets regularly to provide implementation guidance Pilot process or
staggered implementation
- Slide 14
- Administrator Evaluation Planning Team Facilitator: Dr.
Christine Carver Orientation: June 18, 2012 3:00 4:00 August 24,
2012 12:00 3:00 September 14, 2012 October 18, 2012 November 16,
2012 December 14, 2012 January 17, 2013 February 13, 2013 April 8,
2013 May 16, 2013 The Dates..
- Slide 15
- Summer Work Marzano, R.J., Waters, T, & McNulty B.A.
(2005). School Leadership that Works: From research to results.
Virginia: ASCD. Marzano, R.J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D.
(2011). Effective Supervision: Supporting the art and science of
Teaching. Virginia: ASCD. Guiding Question for ReadingDue Date for
Forum in PD 360 Leadership Responsibilities : pp. 164 What
parallels do you see between The 21 Responsibilities of the School
Leader and the Connecticuts Leadership Standards? What practices
currently exist? Where do we need to grow? June 30, 2012 Orders of
Change: pp. 65-122 If we want to identify effective leadership
practices, what structures and practices need to change? Do you see
them as first order or second order change? Why or why not? July
30, 2012 Blog 3: Read Effective Supervision: What do you see as the
effective leadership practices that support effective supervision?
August 24, 2012
- Slide 16
- Where will I blog my responses? PD 360
- Slide 17
- Questions and/or concerns?