Agile contracts

Post on 17-Nov-2014

679 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Presentation about different approaches both common — Capped T & M or Incremental Delivery — and rare, e.g. Cost Targeted, and share our experience about what's is going on in real life.

transcript

Agile Contracts

Andris BarissVladimir Tarasow

customersupplier

negotiations

contract

risks

Risk is the potential that a chosen action or activity, including the choice of inaction, will lead to a loss.

Wikipedia

Risk is the effect of uncertainty on objectives.

ISO 31000 (2009) / ISO Guide 73:2002

Risks should be:● identified — severity and impact● classified — people, process or

technology● analyzed — prioritization● planned, tracked and etc.

risks are uncertain

When we estimate a project we base it on our idea of scope.

But actually,it's the customer

who is in control of scope.

requirementsare uncertain

agile contracts

Capped Time & Material

Traits:● Fixed time● Fixed budget● Scope can be altered● Requirements are stable

Capped Time & Material

Capped Time & Material

Pros:● Supplier gets full coverage of its

expenses.● Customer benefits from the limit to the

total exposure.● Both parties interested in delivering high

value functionality as early as possible.

Capped Time & Material

Cons:● Requirements should remain stable.● Both parties must work closely together

to identify needs, wishes and priorities from the very beginning.

Incremental Delivery

Traits:● Regular inspection points.● Can be stopped after some point.● Requirements can be changed wildly.● Good for building prototypes.

Incremental Delivery

Incremental Delivery

Pros:● Natural for the Agile Teams.● Supplier gets full coverage of its

expenses.● Customer can stop the project after the

inspection point to save the budget.

Incremental Delivery

Cons:● Customer should be familiar with

incremental development.● Requires a certain level of trust between

supplier and customer.● Uncertain future for the supplier.

Cost Targeted

Traits:● Fixed scope.● Better for long-term relationships.● Share risk fairly between Customer and

Supplier.● Align goals by giving both parties an

incentive to minimise scope.

Cost Targeted

More gain, more pain.

Cost Targeted

Pros:● Both sides benefit of savings.● Both sides share the penalties.● Gives certainty about the maximum

price.

Cost Targeted

Cons:● It's very hard to agree on a realistic final

price of the product.● Both organizations must truly understand

the model.

time to practice

Every FridayI like to enjoy

tasty cocktails.

Rules

● 5 mins to discuss what you will do● 10 mins to ask me questions● 10 mins to build a proposal

???

Vladimir Tarasow

About: http://about.me/netratE-mail: netrat@netrat.eu

Andris Bariss

About: lv.linkedin.com/in/andrisbarissE-mail: andris.bariss@gmail.com

Thank You!

Please, leave feedback!

http://spkr8.com/t/21031

Materials used in the presentation:● Wikipedia: www.wikipedia.org● Agile Contracts collection by Alistair Cockburn: alistair.cockburn.

us/Agile+contracts● 'Minimal Marketable Features - MMFs Explained' (www.netobjectives.com)● 'Target Cost Contracts' by John Rusk (www.agilekiwi.

com/estimationandpricing/target-cost-contracts)● Photo from Wikimedia by Properpilot● Photo from Wikimedia by Nik Frey● The reproduction 'Saint Wolfgang and the devil' by Michael Pacher via

GNU Free Documentation License● Illustrations by Arina Noviani (arinanoviani.deviantart.com)● Illustrations by Vladimir Tarasow

Credits

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this

license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.