Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?

Post on 14-Jan-2016

25 views 0 download

description

Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?. Villa Olmo (Como), 7 - 10 Sept 2005. ! how important for transverse spin studies. Marco Radici. Pavia. In collaboration with: A. Bacchetta (Univ. Regensburg) A. Bianconi (Univ. Brescia). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

1

Alternative approaches to transversity: Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?how convenient and feasible are they ?Alternative approaches to transversity: Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?how convenient and feasible are they ?

Marco Radici Pavia

Villa Olmo (Como), 7 - 10 Sept 2005

In collaboration with: A. Bacchetta (Univ. Regensburg)A. Bianconi (Univ. Brescia)

!! how important for how important for transverse spin studiestransverse spin studies!! how important for how important for

transverse spin studiestransverse spin studies

2

Some alternative ways to transversity

search for chiral-odd partner of h1 constraint: leading twist process

initial state polarized Drell-Yan (DY) :

final state

semi-inclusive

DIS :

annihilation :

Collinseffect

InterferenceFragmentation

Functions

3

HESR@GSI:

Drell-Yan

Collins-Soper frame

always valence quarks

COMPASS ? higher statistics

c.m. energy

invariant mass

parton momenta

in plane

DIS regime

(P.R. D16 (’77) 2219)

4

Leading twist cross section D. Boer, P.R. D60 (’99) 014012Tangermann & Mulders, P.R. D51 (’95) 3357

MC Asym

fitted against data (Conway et al., P.R. D39 (‘89) 92)

h1?

Sivers

5

Generate the asymmetry

Summing upon qT, , x1, for some fixed S1 and S2 for each x2´ xp accumulate events with

F[, S1, S2] > 0 $ U

F[, S1, S2] < 0 $ D

SSA (x2) = (U-D) / (U+D)

For each case, repeat simulation independently for 20 times! build mean value and variance of SSA for each x2

For assume flavor symmetry and select

and test when SSA (x) reflects the same differences within error bars) extraction h1(x) , h1

? (x) is statistically possible

Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014; hep-ph/0504261, P.R. D in press

cross sect.

6

8000 events with dilut. factor = 0.85

Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014

7

s » 200 (GeV)2

Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014

statistical error bars from 20 repetitions

unambiguous extraction seemspossible

8

Monte Carlo sample

Program ! total for absorption of antiprotons per nucleon producing Drell-Yan event in the selected kinematics

luminosity L x = # of “good” Drell-Yan events per N and per sec.

after cuts dilution factor

polarized events

HESR@GSI8K collider

40K fixed target

0.85

0.25

6.8K

10K

COMPASS 500K fixed target 0.25 125K

mode s (GeV)2 M (GeV) tot (nb/N) events/month

collider 200 1.5 ¥ 2.5 2.4 60K

4 ¥ 9 0.1 2.5K

fixed target 30 1.5 ¥ 2.5 0.8 20K

4 ¥ 9 4 x 10-4 10

L=1031

(cm-2s-1)

9

s » 200 (GeV)2

Bianconi & M.R.in preparation

statistical error bars from 10 repetitions

unambiguous extraction seemspossible

cross sect.

10

Anselmino et al.P.R. D71 (05) 074006

hep-ph/0507181

Model assumptions for Sivers

q = u,d

11

s » 200 (GeV)2

Anselmino et al. P.R. D71 (05) 074006

xF

statistical error bars from 10 repetitions

Anselmino et al. hep-ph/0507181

12

s » 200 (GeV)2

statistical error bars from 10 repetitions

PRELIMINARY

13

First message

• combination of unpolarized / single- / double-polarized Drell-Yan with antiproton beams can give information on h1(x), h1

? (x) (violation of Lam-Tung sum rule), and f1T

? (Sivers)

• at GSI the collider mode is highly preferable because for s ¼ 200 GeV2

the phase space is more populated; for luminosity 1031 (cm-2s-1) and 9 ¸ M ¸ 4 GeV a reasonable statistics is reached after 3 months of data taking

• at COMPASS in fixed target mode, s ¼ 200 GeV2 can be reached with 100 GeV pion beams; statistics of pion-induced events can be much better than antiproton one ! more precise and unambiguous information

14

2 hadron semi-inclusive processe p" ! e’ (1 2) X p p" ! (12) X ..

asymmetry in the azimuthal orientation of pair plane suggested for the first time by Collins, Heppelmann & Ladinski, 1994 but no twist analysis nor quantitative calculations (see also Ji 1994) then Jaffe, Jin, Tang 1998 ! suggestion of SSA from interference of () partial wavesBianconi, Boffi, Jakob, M.R., 2000 ! complete twist-2 analysis and first model calc.Bacchetta, M.R. ! partial wave expansion () L ; twist-3 ; pp collisions…

Transversity from SIDIS : Collins effect

generalized factorization schemeproof for Drell-Yan and low-pT SIDIS only (Ji, Ma, Yuan, P.L. B597 (’04) 299 ) ; universality “still under debate” ; evolution ?

search for effects ! SSA , but surviving sdpT dPhT

15

Interference Fragmentation Functions for q ! (h1,h2) X with unpolarized h1,h2

functions of ( z, =z1/z1+z

2 , Mh

2, kT2, kT¢RT ) ! ( z, , Mh

2 )

( twist-2 Bianconi, Boffi, Jakob, M.R., P.R. D62 (2000) 034008 ; twist-3 Bacchetta, M.R., P.R. D69 (04) 074026; partial waves P.R. D67 (03) 094002 )

Ph=P1+P2

R=(P1-P2)/2

(LM) (L’M’)

16

RT

e p" ! e’ (h1h2) X

- no specific weight ! easier SSA

- easier factorization proof ; universality- no admixture with other effects

leading-twist dleading-twist d

from e+e- ! (+-)jet 1 (+-)jet 2 X(Boer, Jakob, M.R. P.R. D67 (03) 094003 )

AUT

17

ep" ! e’ (+-) X at leading twist

(Jaffe, Jin, Tang, P.R.L. 80 (98) 1166)

• no calculation of qI (z)• , stable particles• interference from - phase shifts only

(M.R., Jakob, Bianconi, P.R. D65 (02) 074031 )

uncertainty band from:• different fp / fs strength ratio• f1(x), h1(x) from spectator model• f1(x), h1(x)=g1(x) from GRV98 & GRSV96

• f1(x), h1(x) = (f1+g1)/2 from “ “

spectator model

spectator model

Trento conventions ! reverse sign!

18

Breit-Wigner m, , m, mK0 , K0 from PDG

form factor

fit parameters

+ h.c.

+ same for K0

S

New model

19

[GeV]

PRELIMIN

ARY

def. of AUT

removes all elastic, single and double diffractive events! only semi-inclusive

fit

20

PRELIMINARYf1, h1 from spectator model

f1, h1=g1 from GRV98 & GRSV96

predict

21

Second message

• interpretation of upcoming HERMES 2 semi-inclusive data in terms of collinear fragmentation via IFF seems reasonable and feasible

• extraction of transversity via IFF more convenient with respect to Collins effect : - integration upon PhT makes leading twist cross section very simple: unpolarized term + transversity x IFF no “contamination” with other (Sivers-like) effects - factorization proof and evolution should be easier

• for COMPASS data work is in progress…

• extraction of IFF from Belle data ; no asymmetric background from hard gluon radiation ! please, put it at top of shopping list !