Ambrosia Beetle Genotype-by-sequencing

Post on 24-Jun-2015

255 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Using genotype-by-sequencing to uncover the population history of fungus farming ambrosia beetles. Entomological Society of America Annual Meeting, November 9-14, Austin, TX

transcript

Population structure in a haplo-diploid fungus farming beetle New insights from genotype-by-sequencing

female

male

Caroline Storer & Jiri Hulcr University of Florida

Ambrosia beetles build galleries in the xylem of dying trees for farming their symbiotic fungus

The Xyleborini are a hyper-diverse (~1,200 species) tribe of Ambrosia beetles

The Xyleborini have bizarre genetics

The Xyleborini have bizarre genetics

diploid mother

haploid son

Haplo-diploid: Females produce many diploid

daughters and one haploid son

The Xyleborini have bizarre genetics

diploid mother

haploid son

Haplo-diploid: Females produce many diploid

daughters and one haploid son

Inbreed: The haploid son mates with its sisters

1) What is the effect of haplo-diploid inbreeding on genetic diversity and population structure?

1) What is the effect of haplo-diploid inbreeding on genetic diversity and population structure?

2) Are new high-throughput genotype-by-sequencing methods suitable for these near-clonal organisms?

Why genotype-by-sequencing?

Why genotype-by-sequencing?

o  Fast -  No marker development -  Sample prep takes days

Why genotype-by-sequencing?

o  Fast -  No marker development -  Sample prep takes days

o High-throughput

-  100s of individuals -  100s of genotypes

Why genotype-by-sequencing?

o  Fast -  No marker development -  Sample prep takes days

o High-throughput

-  100s of individuals -  100s of genotypes

o Robust -  High-quality sequence data -  Biological signals are recoverable (Buerkle & Gompert 2013)

Why genotype-by-sequencing?

o  Fast -  No marker development -  Sample prep takes days

o High-throughput

-  100s of individuals -  100s of genotypes

o Robust -  High-quality sequence data -  Biological signals are recoverable (Buerkle & Gompert 2013)

Xylosandrus crassiusculus

1  mm  

Xylosandrus crassiusculus

1  mm  

o  Abundant

Xylosandrus crassiusculus

1  mm  

o  Abundant

o  Exotic (in the US)

Xylosandrus crassiusculus

1  mm  

o  Abundant

o  Exotic (in the US)

o  Sometimes pest

Xylosandrus crassiusculus

1  mm  

o  Abundant

o  Exotic (in the US)

o  Sometimes pest

Maryland

Northern NC

Southern NC

North Florida

South Carolina

Central Florida

2-3 beetles sequenced from 6 locations

restriction-site associated sequencing (RADseq)

restriction-site associated sequencing (RADseq)

Petterson et al. 2012

restriction-site associated sequencing (RADseq)

Petterson et al. 2012

ddRADseq enables the sequencing of the same genomic region in many taxonomically related individuals

Sequences are sorted by an individual’s unique barcode... 1

Sequences are sorted by an individual’s unique barcode...

Stack 1 Stack 2

then assembled into locus stacks based on sequence similarity

Stack X

1

2

89,429 stacks in catalog

89,429 stacks in catalog

89,429 stacks in catalog

21,860 stacks shared across

individuals

89,429 stacks in catalog

2,984 SNP loci

genotyped

21,860 stacks shared across

individuals

-­‐1  

-­‐0.8  

-­‐0.6  

-­‐0.4  

-­‐0.2  

0  

0.2  

0.4  

0.6  

0.8  

1  

FIS

locus

FIS > 0 inbreeding

FIS < 0 outbreeding

Inbreeding detected at most loci

No population structure associated with geographic location

Central Florida North Florida South Carolina Southern North Carolina Northern North Carolina Maryland

Principal coordinate 1 (35.34%)

Principal coordinate 2

(14.54%)

In summary...

In summary...

o  Genotype-by-sequencing is possible

In summary...

o  Genotype-by-sequencing is possible o  High inbreeding (>0.8) at most loci, but

some outbreeding may occur

In summary...

o  Genotype-by-sequencing is possible o  High inbreeding (>0.8) at most loci, but

some outbreeding may occur o No genetic structure associated with

geographic location

In summary...

o  Genotype-by-sequencing is possible o  High inbreeding (>0.8) at most loci, but

some outbreeding may occur o No genetic structure associated with

geographic location o  High genetic similarity between some

individuals, but not clonal

o What is the global population structure ambrosia beetles?

o What is the global population structure ambrosia beetles?

o  How does population structure differ between outbreeding and inbreeding ambrosia beetles?

o What is the global population structure ambrosia beetles?

o  How does population structure differ between outbreeding and inbreeding ambrosia beetles? Native and exotic?

o What is the global population structure ambrosia beetles?

o  How does population structure differ between outbreeding and inbreeding ambrosia beetles? Native and exotic?

o  Is population structure correlated with fungal symbiont biodiversity?

o What is the global population structure ambrosia beetles?

o  How does population structure differ between outbreeding and inbreeding ambrosia beetles? Native and exotic?

o  Is population structure correlated with fungal symbiont biodiversity?

o  Are species complexes a phenotypically plastic single species or distinct cryptic species?

The Forest Entomology Lab at University of

Florida

Dr. Jiri Hulcr

Martin Kostovcik

Craig Bateman

 

Andrew Johnson

 

Polly Harding (not shown)

UF Graduate Student Council

Thanks!

cgstorer@gmail.com http://about.me/caroline.storer

quality filtered

sequences

sequences per library

total sequences

used sequences

total_seqs filtered_seqs used_seqs unique_seqs

2e+05

4e+05

6e+05

8e+05

1e+06

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

> 40,000 sequence targets for marker discovery

stacks

stacks per library

60,000

50,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

o  58% of stacks identical between individuals o  9,054 stacks contain putative SNPs o  Calling genotypes: –  Present in > 80% of individuals –  5 sequences (RAD-tags) required to confirm each

genotype within an individual –  Minimum minor allele frequency of 0.1

o  2,948 loci genotyped in 16 individuals