Post on 27-Feb-2022
transcript
Copyright © 2015 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
City of Springfield
ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
Police and Firefighters Retirement Fund Second Quarter 2015
Jeffrey Boucek, CFA Kristopher Katarski Senior Vice President Senior Consultant
Table of Contents
Section
Ø Financial Market Conditions 1
Ø Total Plan 2
Ø Investment Managers 3
This performance report (“Report”) is based upon information obtained by Segal Rogerscasey (“SRC”) from third parties over which SRC does not exercise any control. Although the information is collected by SRC is believed to be reliable, SRC cannot verify or guarantee the accuracy or validity of such information of the uniformity of the manner in which such information was prepared. The rates of return reflected herein are time weighted and geometrically link on a monthly basis using a modified Dietz method. Monthly valuations and returns are calculated based on the assumption that all transactions and prices are accurate from the custodian and / or investment manager. The client to whom Segal Rogerscasey delivers this Report (“Client”) agrees and acknowledges that this Report has been prepared solely for the benefit of Client. SRC disclaims any and all liability that may arise in connection with Client’s conveyance (whether or not consented to by SRC) of this report (in whole or in part) to any third party. Client further agrees and acknowledges that SRC shall have no liability, whatsoever, resulting from, or with respect to, errors in, incompleteness of, the information obtained from third parties. Client understands that the prior performance of an investment and / or investment manager is not indicative of such investment's and / or investment manager’s future performance. This Report does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer for the purchase of sale of any security nor is it an endorsement of any custodian, investment and / or investment manager.
1
Second Quarter 2015 Investment Performance: Summary by Asset Class This section provides data on investment performance for select market indices mostly for the second quarter (Q2) 2015, as well as Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary.
World equity markets were positive in Q2. On a global developed factor* basis, Growth, Quality and Momentum generally performed well, while Risk and Value performed poorly. International developed and emerging market equities modestly outperformed the U.S.
U.S. and international fixed income fell in Q2. Rising Treasury yields were a negative contributor to performance. The Federal Reserve (Fed) indicated that it would continue an accommodative policy.
Commodities ended Q2 in positive territory. On a sector basis, Energy and Grains had strong performance, while Livestock, Precious Metals and Industrial Metals posted negative returns.
Hedge fund of funds were slightly positive dur ing Q2. With regard to direct hedge funds, Equity Hedge, Event-Driven and Relative Value gained while Macro declined.
*Factors are attributes that explain differences in equity performance. Stocks are sorted based on their exposure to a particular factor, with the factor return being the difference in returns between stocks with high exposure and low exposure to a particular attribute.
-35%-30%-25%-20%-15%-10%
-5%0%5%
10%15%
World Equities U.S. Equities InternationalEquities
EMEquities
U.S. FixedIncome
InternationalFixed Income
Commodities* Real Estate Private Equity** Funds of HedgeFunds
QTD 1-Year
Asset Class Summary: Quarter-to-Date (QTD) and One-Year Returns
Asset Class Indices QTD YTD 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Equities MSCI World (Net of dividends) 0.31 2.63 1.43 14.27 13.10 6.38
Russell 3000 0.14 1.94 7.29 17.73 17.54 8.15
MSCI EAFE (Net of dividends) 0.62 5.52 -4.22 11.97 9.54 5.12
MSCI EM (Net of dividends) 0.69 2.95 -5.12 3.71 3.68 8.11
Fixed Income Barclays Capital Aggregate -1.68 -0.10 1.86 1.83 3.35 4.44
Citigroup Non-U.S. WGBI (Unhedged) -1.54 -5.83 -13.49 -3.88 0.33 2.63
Other Commodity Splice* 6.70 -0.89 -30.26 -9.74 -4.12 -4.44
NCREIF NPI 3.14 6.83 12.98 11.63 12.72 8.16
Thomson Reuters Private Equity** 3.35 11.75 11.75 15.48 14.39 11.99
HFRI Fund of Funds Composite 0.11 2.61 3.86 6.24 4.08 3.20
*Commodity Splice, a Segal Rogerscasey index, blends the Bloomberg Commodity Index, formerly known as the DJ UBS Commodity Index (50%) and the S&P GSCI Index (50%), rebalanced monthly. **Performance reported as of Q4 2014 because Q1 2015 and Q2 2015 performance data is not yet available. Sources: eVestment Alliance, Investment Metrics, Thomson One and Hedge Fund Research, Inc.
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 1
Page 3
World Economy: Key Indicators This section provides data on select U.S. and global economic indicators for Q2 2015 along with Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary.
U.S. GDP Growth: Annualized Quarterly and Year-over-Year (YoY) Rolling (%)
Target Rates: U.S. and Eurozone
GDP Growth
Real GDP grew at an annualized rate of 2.32 percent in Q2. The adjacent graph shows annualized GDP growth, along with the year-over-year (YoY) rolling percentage change in GDP. Positive contributors for the quarter included personal consumption, exports, state and local government spending, and residential fixed investment. Federal government spending, private inventory investment, and non-residential fixed investment detracted from GDP during Q2. Personal and disposable income grew. The savings rate stood at 4.8 percent.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
Jun-
02
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
Targ
et R
ate
U.S. Eurozone
Monetary Policy
As its June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) stated the following: Economic activity expanded moderately and labor market conditions continued to
improve, Net exports and business fixed investment remained weak, Inflation is expected to rise toward 2 percent in the medium term, The Federal Funds Rate of 0.0 to 0.25 percent remains appropriate toward the Fed’s
objectives of maximum employment and price stability, The Fed will continue to reinvest principal payments from holdings of agency debt and
agency mortgage-backed securities, and roll over maturing Treasury securities at auction so as to maintain an accommodative policy.
The FOMC will keep accommodation in place as economic conditions warrant, but when it determines conditions are appropriate to remove accommodation, it will take a balanced approach.
The European Central Bank (ECB) held its target refinancing rate at 0.05 percent, its marginal lending rate at 0.30 and its deposit rate at -0.20. The ECB’s quantitative easing program consists of monthly purchases of public and private sector securities in the amount of 60 billion euros, but bond purchases may accelerate if liquidity decreases. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) maintained its quantitative and qualitative easing policy in June with the goal of increasing the monetary base by approximately 80 trillion yen on an annual basis.
Sources: Segal Rogerscasey using data from the Federal Reserve Board and the European Central Bank
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 2
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
Q2
20
05
Q4
20
05
Q2
20
06
Q4
20
06
Q2
20
07
Q4
20
07
Q2
20
08
Q4
20
08
Q2
20
09
Q4
20
09
Q2
20
10
Q4
20
10
Q2
20
11
Q4
20
11
Q2
20
12
Q4
20
12
Q2
20
13
Q4
20
13
Q2
20
14
Q4
20
14
Q2
20
15Per
cent
Cha
nge
Quarterly GDP Growth Annualized YoY Rolling GDP Growth
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
Page 4
World Economy: Key Indicators This section provides data on select U.S. and global economic indicators for Q2 2015 along with Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary.
Headline CPI and Core CPI: Percentage Change YoY
10-Year Break-Even Inflation Rate
Inflation
Break-Even Inflation
The adjacent graph shows the 10-year break-even inflation rate, which measures the difference in yield between a nominal 10-year Treasury bond and a comparable 10-year Treasury inflation-protected security bond (TIPS). The break-even inflation rate is an ind icator of the market’s inflation expectations over the horizon of the bond. The 10-year break-even rate increased from 1.78 percent in Q1 to 1.89 percent in Q2. As noted on page 2 (see “Monetary Policy”), the Fed expects inflation to gradually rise to 2 percent.
Source: Bloomberg
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 3
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
Jun-
09
Sep
-09
Dec
-09
Mar
-10
Jun-
10
Sep
-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11
Sep
-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12
Sep
-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep
-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Sep
-14
Dec
-14
Mar
-15
Jun-
15
Yie
ld
The headline seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index (CPI)* rose 0.87 percent in Q2, and increased 0.18 percent on a YoY basis. Seasonally adjusted Core CPI, which excludes both food and energy prices, rose 0.58 percent in Q2, bringing the YoY core CPI increase to 1.77 percent. On an unadjusted basis for the 12 months ended June 2015, the energy component (-15.0 percent) fell the most. Commodities less food and energy commodities (-0.4 percent) was also slightly negative. Food (1.8 percent) and services less energy services (2.5 percent) were positive. * Headline CPI is the CPI-U, the CPI for all urban consumers.
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Jun-
97
Jun-
98
Jun-
99
Jun-
00
Jun-
01
Jun-
02
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
Per
cent
age
Cha
nge
YOY % Change in CPI YOY % Change in Core CPI
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Page 5
World Economy: Key Indicators This section provides data on select U.S. and global economic indicators for Q2 2015 along with Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary.
Unemployment and Nonfarm Payrolls
U.S. Consumer Sentiment
Labor Market and the Unemployment Rate
Unemployment fell from 5.5 percent in Q1 to 5.3 percent in Q2. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 223,000 jobs in June, which was in line with expectations. In percent of total terms, goods-producing industries contributed less jobs to payroll gains in Q2 than in Q1, while services contributed more jobs than in Q1, and private industries contributed about the same number of jobs as in Q1. The one-month diffusion index* rose to 60.5 in June from 59.3 in March. The labor force participation rate was 62.6 percent in June, 0.1 percent lower than it was in March. *According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, figures represent the percent of industries with employment increasing plus one-half of the industries with unchanged employment, where 50 percent indicates an equal balance between industries with increasing and decreasing employment.
Consumer Sentiment The University of Michigan Index of U.S. Consumer Sentiment is an economic indicator that measures individuals’ confidence in the stability of their incomes as well as the state of the economy. The Consumer Sentiment Index increased from 93.0 in March to 96.1 in June. Views on present conditions and expectations rebounded during Q2. A stronger job market along with low inflation helped to boost consumer confidence. Increases in personal income, which rose more than expectations, with higher consumer outlays (the dollar value of goods purchases) also contributed to the improved sentiment. Inflation expectations on both a one-year and five-year basis decreased from Q1.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Moody’s Economy.com using data from the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 4
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Jun-
08
Sep
-08
Dec
-08
Mar
-09
Jun-
09
Sep
-09
Dec
-09
Mar
-10
Jun-
10
Sep
-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11
Sep
-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12
Sep
-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep
-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Sep
-14
Dec
-14
Mar
-15
Jun-
15
Con
sum
er S
entim
ent
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
6-Month A
vg. Change
Nonfarm
Payrolls (,000) U
nem
ploy
men
t R
ate
(%)
Unemployment Rate10-Year Avg. Unemployment6-Month Avg. Change Nonfarm Payrolls
Page 6
Investor Sentiment: Mutual Fund Flows This page presents mutual fund flows across equity and fixed-income funds. Flow estimates are derived from data collected covering more than 95 percent of industry assets and are adjusted to represent industry totals.
Monthly Mutual Fund Net Flows ($ Millions) Q2 2015
Mutual Fund Flows vs. ETFs ($ Millions): New Net Cash Flows
Net Mutual Fund Flows The adjacent graph shows net flows into equity and fixed income mutual funds. In Q2, mutual funds experienced net inflows of approximately $17.7 billion, a significant slowdown from Q1, when roughly $63.1 billion was invested in such vehicles. Q2 inflows were driven by fixed income mutual funds, as equity flows turned negative.
Treasuries in the U.S. continued to generate positive results for the quarter; the Fed indicated it may raise rates gradually later this year. Overall, the Treasury yield curve widened during Q2. The 10-year Treasury note closed at 2.33 percent, 41 bps higher than Q1.
Equity mutual funds experienced around $6.5 billion in outflows during Q2, as domestic mutual fund outflows of $50.8 billion exceeded international mutual fund inflows of $44.3 billion. Hybrid mutual funds experienced inflows of $2.2 billion.
Mutual Fund Flows vs. Exchange-Traded Funds
In addition to the $17.7 billion in Q2 mutual fund net inflows, ETFs also experienced net flows totaling $23.2 billion dur ing April and May 2015 (June numbers have not yet been reported). At the end of May, ETF assets totaled about $2.1 trillion, up from around $1.8 trillion in May 2014. All types of ETFs, including domestic equity, foreign equity, taxable bonds, municipal bonds, and hybrid mutual funds experienced inflows in April and May.
Source: Investment Company Institute http://www.ici.org
Source: Investment Company Institute http://www.ici.org
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
-$70,000-$60,000-$50,000-$40,000-$30,000-$20,000-$10,000
$0$10,000$20,000$30,000$40,000$50,000
Jun-
07
Sep
-07
Dec
-07
Mar
-08
Jun-
08
Sep
-08
Dec
-08
Mar
-09
Jun-
09
Sep
-09
Dec
-09
Mar
-10
Jun-
10
Sep
-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11
Sep
-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12
Sep
-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep
-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Sep
-14
Dec
-14
Mar
-15
Jun-
15
S&
P 500
® Level
Mon
thly
Net
New
flow
s
($ M
illion
s)
Total Equity MF Flows Total Fixed-Income MF Flows S&P 500® Index
-$80,000
-$60,000
-$40,000
-$20,000
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
Jan-
10
Jun-
10
Nov
-10
Ap
r-1
1
Sep
-11
Feb-
12
Jul-
12
Dec
-12
May
-13
Oct
-13
Mar
-14
Aug
-14
Jan-
15
Jun-
15
Mon
thly
New
Net
Flo
ws
($ M
illion
s)
Net Issuance of Shares - ETFs Net New Cash Flow - Mutual Funds
Page 7
Investment Performance: U.S. Equities This section presents data and Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary on U.S. equity index returns and sector performance for Q2 2015.
The graph below illustrates Q2 2015 rates of return for selected U.S. equity indices. The table shows returns for the latest quarter, year-to-date, one-year, three-year, five-year and 10-year annualized timeframes. All data in the table are percentages.
S&P 500 Index® Sector Performance – Q2 2015
U.S. Equity Index Returns
Index and Sector Performance The S&P 500® (0.3 percent) eked out a positive return, and most major U.S. equity indexes followed suit to a greater or lesser extent. With the Global Financial Cr isis becoming a more distant memory, only the 10-year index returns shown in the table above incorporate those bad times; the 3- and 5-year returns are much higher than very long term historical averages for U.S. equities. Among large cap names, style was not a differentiating factor, as the Russell 1000 Growth and Russell 1000 Value benchmarks were only 1 basis point apart at the end of Q2. This is in contrast to small cap stocks, where the difference between the styles was 318 bps in favor of growth. At the sector level, Q1 trends continued into Q2. Utilities (-5.8 percent) fell again on concerns about interest rate increases, and Healthcare (2.8 percent) rose as fears about the negative impact of a Republican Congress lost their urgency. Consumer Discretionary (1.9 percent) had another good quarter thanks to healthy spending due to low interest rates and the job market’s continued improvement.
Sources: Standard & Poor’s and Russell Investments
This table shows quarter-to-date and year-to-date price changes for each sector. Source: Standard & Poor's
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 6
Equity Indices QTD YTD 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
S&P 500® Index 0.28 1.23 7.42 17.31 17.34 7.89
Russell 1000 0.11 1.71 7.37 17.73 17.58 8.13
Russell 1000 Growth 0.12 3.96 10.56 17.99 18.59 9.10
Russell 1000 Value 0.11 -0.61 4.13 17.34 16.50 7.05
Russell 2000 0.42 4.75 6.49 17.81 17.08 8.40
Russell 2000 Growth 1.98 8.74 12.34 20.11 19.33 9.86
Russell 2000 Value -1.20 0.76 0.78 15.50 14.81 6.87
Russell 3000 0.14 1.94 7.29 17.73 17.54 8.15
QTD (%) YTD (%)
Consumer Discretionary 1.9 6.8
Consumer Staples -1.7 -0.8
Energy -1.9 -4.7
Financials 1.7 -0.4
Healthcare 2.8 9.6
Industrials -2.2 -3.1
Information Technology 0.2 0.8
Materials -0.5 0.4
Telecommunications Services 1.6 3.2
Utilities -5.8 -10.7
0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%
2.0%
-1.2%
0.1%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
S&P
500
®
Rus
sell
1000
Rus
sell
1000
Gro
wth
Rus
sell
1000
Val
ue
Rus
sell
2000
Rus
sell
2000
Gro
wth
Rus
sell
2000
Val
ue
Rus
sell
3000
Page 8
Investment Performance: U.S. Equities This section presents Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary on U.S. equity earnings and growth- vs. value-stock performance for Q2 2015.
Growth Stocks vs. Value Stocks (Rolling 3-Year)
U.S. Equity Market Earnings and Volatility
Growth vs. Value The adjacent graph depicts the growth versus value differential for both large- and small-cap stocks over rolling three-year intervals. The large-cap calculation uses the Russell 1000 Growth (R1000G) versus the Russell 1000 Value (R1000V) and the small-cap differential is composed of the Russell 2000 Growth (R2000G) versus the Russell 2000 Value (R2000V). An interesting dynamic in recent years has been the fact that growth and value have largely been irrelevant in driving large cap equity returns, as the spread between the growth and value benchmarks has been quite narrow. Small caps have shown some preference for growth, particularly during the first half of 2015.
Source: Standard & Poor’s
Source: Russell Investments
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 7
The adjacent graph compares the earnings per share of companies in the S&P 500® Index and the growth of $1.00 since June 1989. While earnings per share growth does not align perfectly with the growth of stock prices, there does appear to be a directional linkage, which is something many investors count upon. It is interesting that earnings dipped in Q4 and Q1, but this was not reflected in stock returns. Earnings are perhaps the single most studied metric in a company's financial statements because they show a company's profitability. A company's quarterly and annual earnings are typically compared to analysts’ estimates and guidance provided by the company itself. In most situations, when earnings do not meet either of those estimates, a company's stock price will tend to drop. On the other hand, when actual earnings beat estimates by a significant amount, the share price will likely surge. At the aggregate level, these swings tend to be more muted.
S&P 500® Index: Earnings Per Share and Growth of $1
-$1
$1
$3
$5
$7
$9
$11
$13
$15
-$1
$4
$9
$14
$19
$24
$29
Jun-
89
Jun-
90
Jun-
91
Jun-
92
Jun-
93
Jun-
94
Jun-
95
Jun-
96
Jun-
97
Jun-
98
Jun-
99
Jun-
00
Jun-
01
Jun-
02
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
S&
P 500
® G
rowth of $
1
Ear
ning
s P
er S
hare
S&P Earnings Per Share S&P 500® Growth of $1
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
Jun-
02
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
Gro
wth
/Val
ue D
iffer
entia
l
Large-Cap Growth/Value DifferentialSmall-Cap Growth/Value Differential
Growth Outperforms
Value Outperforms
Page 9
Investment Performance: Non-U.S. Equities This section presents data and Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary on international equity returns and sector performance for Q2 2015.
The graph below illustrates Q2 2015 rates of return for selected non-U.S. equity indices. The table shows returns for the latest quarter, year-to-date, one-year, three-year, five-year and 10-year annualized timeframes. All data in the table are percentages.
MSCI EAFE Sector Performance – Q2 2015
MSCI Non-U.S. Equity Index Returns
Index and Sector Performance
International equity market returns were mixed in Q2, as early gains on improving economic growth were offset by fears of rising interest rates, a worsening debt crisis in Greece, and heightened concerns over slowing growth in China during the second half of the quarter. Both the EAFE and World indices were relatively neutral, returning 0.6 percent and 0.3 percent, respectively. The strongest performance came from Ireland (8.5 percent), Hong Kong (5.6 percent) and Norway (3.3 percent), but these returns were countered by weak numbers in New Zealand (-13.1 percent), Australia (-6.2 percent) and Germany (-5.6 percent). Currency remained a key topic, as the USD weakened against most developed nations’ currencies, except New Zealand and Japan, resulting in higher returns for U.S.-based investors. For example, the U.K. fell -2.8 percent in local terms, but earned 3.0 percent when converted back to USD.
Most sectors of the MSCI EAFE fell dur ing Q2 with the exception of Telecom (3.3 percent), Energy (1.1 percent) and Financials (0.5 percent). Telecom benefitted from increased M&A deals, which helped to fuel activity in the sector, while Energy stocks gained from higher oil prices. Healthcare (-2.0 percent) fell the most in Q2, mainly due to poor performance in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly driven by GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca’s double-digit negative returns. Within the Materials sector (-1.8 percent), mining companies were hurt by uncertainty surrounding the subdued growth of the Chinese economy.
Source: Morgan Stanley Capital International
This table shows quarter-to-date and year-to-date price changes for each sector. Source: Morgan Stanley Capital International
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 8
MSCI Indices QTD YTD 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
World 0.31 2.63 1.43 14.27 13.10 6.38
Europe, Australasia and Far East (EAFE)
0.62 5.52 -4.22 11.97 9.54 5.12
Europe except U.K. -0.79 4.67 -7.39 14.13 9.66 5.21
Pacific except Japan -2.48 0.58 -6.79 7.53 8.70 7.94
United Kingdom 2.99 2.00 -8.24 9.10 10.68 4.71
Japan 3.09 13.62 8.31 13.30 8.80 4.23
QTD (%) YTD (%)
Consumer Discretionary -0.9 6.9
Consumer Staples -0.6 3.5
Energy 1.1 -4.8
Financials 0.5 4.6
Healthcare -2.0 6.3
Industrials -0.6 4.8
Information Technology -1.7 5.0
Materials -1.8 0.6
Telecommunications Services 3.3 5.4
Utilities -0.1 -5.2
0.3% 0.6%
-0.8%
-2.5%
3.0% 3.1%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
World EAFE Europeexcept
U.K.
PacificexceptJapan
UnitedKingdom
Japan
Page 10
Investment Performance: Emerging Market Equities This section presents data and commentary on emerging market (EM) equity returns and sector performance for Q2 2015.
The graph below illustrates Q2 2015 rates of return for selected emerging market equity indices. The table shows returns for the latest quarter, year-to-date, one-year, three-year, five-year, and 10-year annualized timeframes. All data in the table are percentages.
MSCI EM Sector Performance – Q2 2015
MSCI Emerging Market Equity Index Returns
Index and Sector Performance The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (0.7 percent) gained in Q2. Strong April performance (7.7 percent), was offset by significant declines in May (-4.0 percent) and June (-2.6 percent). Until the last week of June, Asian markets were buoyed by continued accommodative policies in China. In addition, boding poorly for Q2, was a revival of the Greek debt crisis at the end of June, roiling developed and developing markets alike.
At the total index level, currency did not have a material impact on Q2 performance, as the local and USD returns were nearly identical. That said, the euro, the Russian ruble, and the Brazilian real appreciated versus the USD. Currencies that lost ground against the USD during Q2 included the Thai baht, Turkish lira and Mexican peso.
Latin America (3.5 percent) and EMEA (1.9 percent) posted positive returns in Q2, while Asia (-0.2 percent) slightly declined. Hungary (11.0 percent) and the United Arab Emirates (10.7 percent) were the top-performing EM countries, while Indonesia (-14.1 percent) and Malaysia (-7.8 percent) fell the most. Higher commodity prices helped oil-producing countries such as Brazil (6.7 percent), Russia (7.6 percent), and the United Arab Emirates (10.7 percent).
Adding to its Q1 turnaround, Energy (8.5 percent) gained again in Q2 and led all sectors on a quarterly and year-to-date basis. Energy stocks benefitted from a 25 percent rally in oil prices. Healthcare (-4.0 percent) and Information Technology (-4.0 percent) posted the weakest sector returns in Q2, but are still positive year-to-date.
Source: Morgan Stanley Capital International
This table shows quarter-to-date and year-to-date price changes for each sector. Source: Morgan Stanley Capital International
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 9
MSCI EM Indices QTD YTD 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
Emerging Markets (All) 0.69 2.95 -5.12 3.71 3.68 8.11
Asia -0.15 5.07 3.14 8.96 6.79 9.29
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)
1.88 3.87 -14.16 -1.39 1.72 4.93
Latin America 3.51 -6.38 -23.41 -8.08 -4.39 7.45
QTD (%) YTD (%)
Consumer Discretionary -3.2 0.7
Consumer Staples 2.3 4.4
Energy 8.5 11.0
Financials 2.9 2.6
Healthcare -4.0 2.4
Industrials 1.1 2.4
Information Technology -4.0 4.2
Materials 1.3 -0.9
Telecommunications Services 0.1 1.5
Utilities -0.3 -3.5
0.7%
-0.2%
1.9%
3.5%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
EmergingMarkets
Asia EMEA Latin America
Page 11
Investment Performance: U.S. Fixed Income This section presents select U.S. fixed-income index data along with commentary on option-adjusted spreads (OAS) during Q2 2015.
The graph below illustrates Q2 2015 rates of return for selected U.S. fixed-income indices. The table shows returns for the latest quarter, year-to-date, one-year, three-year, five-year and 10-year annualized timeframes. All data in the table are percentages.
OAS* in Bps
U.S. Fixed Income Index Returns
Option-Adjusted Spreads Nearly all sectors of the bond market posted negative results in Q2, which was not surprising given the widening of option-adjusted spreads and the rising yield environment. U.S. Agencies’ Q2 spread was flat, but it remained the only sector to outperform its respective 10-year spread average. Corporate spreads widened across all sectors due to heavy supply and uncertainty in Greece and China. The high yield market experienced the least amount of expansion as issuance slowed. Investment grade corporates, along with its underlying sectors, widened the most, as issuance continued to soar and uncertainty surrounding Greece persisted.
Sources: Barclays Capital, Citigroup and Hueler Analytics
*OAS is the yield spread of bonds versus Treasury yields taking into consideration differing bond options. Source: Barclays Capital
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 10
Fixed-Income Indices QTD YTD 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
BarCap Aggregate -1.68 -0.10 1.86 1.83 3.35 4.44
BarCap Govt/Credit -2.10 -0.30 1.69 1.76 3.52 4.38
BarCap Int Govt/Credit -0.62 0.82 1.68 1.60 2.79 4.02
BarCap Long Govt/Credit -7.57 -4.47 1.94 2.48 6.71 6.14
BarCap Government -1.50 0.08 2.27 0.93 2.63 3.99
BarCap Credit -2.88 -0.78 0.93 3.03 4.93 5.12
BarCap Inv Grade CMBS -1.11 0.72 2.00 3.45 5.83 4.87
BarCap Mortgage -0.74 0.31 2.28 1.92 2.89 4.56
BarCap U.S. Corporate High Yield 0.00 2.53 -0.40 6.81 8.61 7.89
Citi 3-Month T-Bill 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.06 1.34
Hueler Stable Value 0.44 0.88 1.75 1.83 2.18 3.21
03/31/15 06/30/15 Change in
OAS 10-Year Average
U.S. Aggregate Index 46 51 5 71 U.S. Agency (Non-mortgage) Sector 54 54 - 42 Securitized Sectors: Mortgage-Backed Securities 20 26 6 54
Asset-Backed Securities 62 62 - 134
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities 95 101 6 231
Corporate Sectors: U.S. Investment Grade 129 145 16 167 Industrial 136 153 17 154 Utility 121 137 16 157 Financial Institutions 118 133 15 190 U.S. High Yield 466 476 10 561
-1.7% -2.1% -0.6%
-7.6%
-1.5% -2.9%
-1.1% -0.7%
0.0% 0.0% 0.4%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
Bar
Cap
Agg
rega
te
Bar
Cap
Gov
t/C
redi
t
Bar
Cap
Int
Gov
t/C
redi
t
Bar
Cap
Lon
gG
ovt/
Cre
dit
Bar
Cap
Gov
ernm
ent
Bar
Cap
Cre
dit
Bar
Cap
Inv
Gra
deC
MB
S
Bar
Cap
Mor
tgag
e
Bar
Cap
U.S
.C
orp
orat
e H
igh
Yie
ld
Citi
3-M
ont
h T-
Bill
Hue
ler
Sta
ble
Valu
e
Page 12
Investment Performance: U.S. Fixed Income This section presents commentary on the U.S. Treasury yield curve and credit spreads during Q2 2015.
Barclays Capital Corporate Bond Spreads
Yield Curve
Credit Spreads
Investment grade corporate spreads widened by 16 bps during Q2 2015 and ended the quarter with an option-adjusted spread of 145 bps over Treasuries, as shown in the adjacent graph. From a historical perspective, spreads are 24 bps below the 10-year average of 169 bps. High yield bond spreads widened by 10 basis points, ending Q2 with a OAS of 4.76 percent at the end of June, which is 73 bps below the 10-year average of 549 bps.
Source: Bloomberg
Source: Barclays Capital
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 11
The U.S. Treasury yield curve widened during Q2. The yield gap between 2-year and 10-year Treasuries increased from 1.36 percent to 1.70 percent. Yields rose across the curve in response to moderate economic growth, higher and more stable oil prices, and subsiding European deflationary concerns. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield ended Q2 at 2.33 percent, 41 bps above Q1.
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
1.2%
1.6%
2.0%
2.4%
2.8%
3.2%
3.6%
4.0%
1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 30Y
Yie
ld
Maturity
03/31/2015 06/30/2015
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Dec
-11
Jun-
12
Dec
-12
Jun-
13
Dec
-13
Jun-
14
Dec
-14
Jun-
15
Bps
Inv-Grade OAS High Yield OAS10-Year Average 10-Year Average
Page 13
Investment Performance: Non-U.S. Fixed Income This page focuses on international fixed-income asset class data and information on EM debt (EMD) for Q2 2015.
JPMorgan EMBI Global Index Best and Worst-Performing Markets
International Fixed Income
Emerging Market Debt The JPMorgan Emerging Market Bond Index (-0.3 percent) fell in Q2. Despite the poor overall result, performance by asset class varied as developed market interest rates rose and EM spreads tightened. The three best- and worst-performing markets of the index are noted in the adjacent graph. The corporate JPMorgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Index gained 1.3 percent. Ukraine (31.9 percent) was the most notable outperformer despite continued tensions with Russia. Nearly all countries within the index posted positive results, excluding the Czech Republic (-3.9 percent) and Morocco (-3.4 percent), which reported modest detractions. The local JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index (-0.3 percent) declined in USD unhedged terms. The currency effect was the primary reason for the drawdown, as the index gained 0.2 percent in local terms. From a regional perspective, Asia was the primary source of negative results, as Indonesia (-5.2 percent) suffered from inflationary risks and a depreciating currency.
Sources: Citigroup and Barclays Capital
Source: JPMorgan
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 12
In Q2, global sovereign bonds, as measured by the Citigroup World Government Bond Index (WGBI), fell 2.7 percent in local currency terms, and also trailed 1.6 percent in unhedged terms. The BarCap Global Aggregate Index, which includes spread sectors, lost 1.2 percent, lagging the sovereign-only Citigroup WGBI Index by roughly 40 bps on an unhedged basis. Non-U.S. government bonds, as measured by the Citigroup Non-U.S. WGBI, underperformed U.S. government bonds by roughly 160 bps in local currency terms, but led by 10 bps in unhedged currency terms. On an unhedged basis, nearly all WGBI components finished Q2 in the red. The exceptions were Canada with flat results and the U.K. at 2.0 percent. There were several notable underperformers in Q2. Italy (-2.7 percent), Spain (-2.5 percent), and Belgium (-2.5 percent) declined the most on an unhedged basis. Much of the negative results can be attributed to the distress in Greece.
Citigroup WGBI: Returns of Major Constituents (%)
Country Local
Currency Return (Qtr)
Currency Effect
Unhedged Total
Return (Qtr) United States -1.6 0.0 -1.6 Canada -1.4 1.4 0.0 Australia -2.8 0.6 -2.2 Japan -0.3 -2.0 -2.3 Austria -5.1 3.5 -1.6 Belgium -6.0 3.5 -2.5 France -5.1 3.5 -1.6 Germany -4.4 3.5 -0.9 Italy -6.2 3.5 -2.7 Netherlands -4.8 3.5 -1.3 Spain -6.0 3.5 -2.5 United Kingdom -3.9 5.9 2.0 Non-U.S. Govt. Bond -3.2 1.7 -1.5 World Govt. Bond -2.7 1.1 -1.6
36.5%
12.7% 7.8%
-0.3% -4.1% -4.6% -4.7%
-10%-5%0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
Ukr
aine
Ven
ezue
la
Bel
arus
EM
BI G
loba
l
Col
ombi
a
Uru
guay
Arg
entin
a
Page 14
050
100150200250300
Jun-
03
Jun-
04
Jun-
05
Jun-
06
Jun-
07
Jun-
08
Jun-
09
Jun-
10
Jun-
11
Jun-
12
Jun-
13
Jun-
14
Jun-
15
S&P GSCI Total Return Index Bloomberg Commodity Index
Investment Performance: Commodities and Currencies This section presents performance information about commodities and major world currencies as of Q2 2015.
Nominal Broad Dollar Index: USD vs. Basket of Major Trading Partners
Commodities
Currencies
The adjacent graph shows the U.S. dollar (USD) against a basket of 16 major market currencies, including those listed in the table below: the Canadian dollar (CAD), the euro (EUR), the Japanese yen (JPY), the Swiss franc (CHF), and the British pound-sterling (GBP). In Q2, the U.S. nominal broad dollar weakened by 0.98 percent. Despite the drop, the USD will continue to benefit from higher relative economic growth and potential for rising interest rates.
The graph above shows the major commodity indices, the S&P GSCI* Index and Bloomberg Commodity Index** * The S&P GSCI Index is calculated primarily on a world production-weighted basis and is composed of the principal physical commodities that are the subject of active, liquid futures markets. ** The Bloomberg Commodity Index is composed of futures contracts on physical commodities, with weighting restrictions on individual commodities and commodity groups to promote diversification. Source: Investment Metrics
Sources: Federal Reserve and Bloomberg
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 13
After a weak Q1, commodities, as represented by the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCI) and the S&P GSCI, rallied in Q2, gaining 4.7 percent and 8.7 percent, respectively. Most commodities are priced in USD, so the overall asset class benefitted from a weaker USD, as its recent strength had dampened international demand. Sectors posted mixed results. Agriculture and Energy generated positive returns, while Industrial Metals, Precious Metals and Livestock declined. The most significant driver of positive performance during Q2 was Energy, which returned 10.9 percent in the BCI and 13.0 percent in the S&P GSCI. In particular, oil prices, which reached six-year lows in Q1, gained almost 25 percent in Q2 due to expectations of slowing supply and higher demand. Given the Energy’s heavy weighting in the S&P GSCI, this served as a large contributor to that index’s outperformance relative to the BCI. Cocoa was also a big winner during Q2. The commodity rose more than 20 percent, as Ghana, the second largest cocoa grower, surprised the market with a 30 percent shortfall in this year’s crop. Regarding detractors, Industrial Metals was the biggest laggard in both indices, falling 5.3 percent in the BCI and 5.5 percent in the S&P GSCI. Copper suffered during Q2, dropping 4.5 percent, as demand in China continued to decrease.
Monthly Commodity Returns, Growth of $100: June 2003 – June 2015
70
90
110
130
150
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Dec
-11
Jun-
12
Dec
-12
Jun-
13
Dec
-13
Jun-
14
Dec
-14
Jun-
15
Nom
inal
Bro
ad D
olla
r In
dex
USD Major Trading Partners Pairs Q2 Level YTD
5-Year Average
Canada USD/CAD 1.2494 7.51% 1.0536 Eurozone USD/EUR 0.8979 8.63% 0.7660 Japan USD/JPY 122.5000 2.27% 93.2237 Switzerland USD/CHF 0.9355 -5.91% 0.9254 U.K. USD/GBP 0.6367 -0.81% 0.6287
Page 15
Investment Performance: Hedge Funds This section provides an overview of hedge fund results along with an analysis of strategy performance during Q2 2015.
Hedge Fund Industry Performance
HFRI Index Returns – Q2 2015 (%)
Hedge Fund Overview The Hedge Fund Research, Inc. (HFRI) Fund Weighted Composite Index gained 0.3 percent in Q2. Hedge funds broadly produced gains in April and May, but losses in June detracted from performance. Four of the five major hedge fund strategies posted positive returns in Q2. The strongest performer was Emerging Markets (3.7 percent), followed by Equity Hedge (2.0 percent), Event Driven (0.8 percent) and Relative Value (0.7 percent). Meanwhile, Global Macro (-3.5 percent) was the worst performing major hedge fund strategy. Longer-term results were also positive. Hedge funds recorded a gain of 6.4 percent over the three-year period ending June 30, 2015, as measured by the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index. Hedge funds of funds were mostly flat in Q2, as represented by the HFRI Fund of Funds (FOF) Composite Index’s 0.1 percent return. The HFRI FOF: Conservative Index (0.2 percent) posted a slight gain and the HFRI FOF: Diversified Index (-0.2 percent) fell.
Strategy Analysis The HFRI Emerging Markets Index (3.7 percent) gained in Q2. Strong performance in April offset mostly flat performance in May and losses during June. China managers led gains followed by Asia ex-Japan, Russia, MENA, Global and Latin American managers. Meanwhile, India managers detracted from returns. The HFRI Equity Hedge Index (2.0 percent) was positive in Q2, as gains in April and May offset losses during June. Technology/Healthcare managers posted the strongest returns of the group, followed by Fundamental Growth, Fundamental Value, Energy/Basic Materials, Multi-Strategy, Market Neutral and Quantitative Directional managers. Meanwhile, Short-Biased managers (-0.8 percent) detracted from the return. The HFRI Event-Driven Index (0.8 percent) gained in Q2. Activist managers contributed the most to performance, followed by Special Situations, Credit Arbitrage, and Merger Arbitrage managers. Meanwhile, Multi-Strategy and Distressed/Restructuring managers weakened Q2 performance. The HFRI Relative Value Index (0.7 percent) posted a positive return in Q2. Volatility managers were the strongest performers, followed by Fixed-Income Asset Backed, Fixed Income Convertible Arbitrage, Fixed-Income Sovereign, Fixed Income Multi-Strategy, and Fixed-Income Corporate managers. Meanwhile, Yield Alternatives managers detracted from Q2 gains. The HFRI Global Macro Index (-3.5 percent) fell in Q2 and was the only major hedge fund strategy to post a loss. Discretionary Thematic was the only underlying strategy that reported positive Q2 results. Meanwhile, Systematic Diversified managers detracted the most from performance, followed by Active Trading, Multi-Strategy, Currency, and Commodity strategies.
* Distressed funds focus on companies that are close to or in bankruptcy. **Relative-value funds focus on arbitrage opportunities between equity and fixed income securities. Source: Hedge Fund Research, Inc.
Source: Hedge Fund Research, Inc.
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 14
-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%
10%
Hed
ge
Fund
Tot
al
Hed
ge
Fund
of
Fund
s
Equ
ity H
edge
Em
ergi
ngM
arke
ts
Eve
ntD
riven
Dis
tress
ed*
Glo
bal
Mac
ro
Rel
ativ
eV
alue
**
Ret
urns
(%
)
YTD (%)1-Year (%)3-Year (%)
Apr May June QTD YTD
Fund of Funds Composite 0.3 1.0 -1.2 0.1 2.6
FOF: Conservative 0.2 0.7 -0.7 0.2 2.1
FOF: Diversified 0.0 0.9 -1.1 -0.2 2.4
Fund Weighted Composite 0.9 0.6 -1.2 0.3 2.5
Equity Hedge (Total) 1.8 1.0 -0.7 2.0 4.1
Equity Market Neutral 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.8 2.4
Short Bias -0.3 -0.8 0.3 -0.8 -2.9
Event-Driven (Total) 1.3 0.7 -1.2 0.8 2.6
Distressed/Restructuring 0.9 0.3 -1.4 -0.2 0.6
Merger Arbitrage 0.6 1.0 -0.6 0.9 3.1
Relative Value (Total) 1.1 0.4 -0.7 0.7 2.6
FI-Convertible Arbitrage 1.4 0.8 -0.8 1.3 3.4
Global Macro (Total) -1.2 0.0 -2.3 -3.5 -0.3
Emerging Markets (Total) 5.5 0.1 -1.8 3.7 4.7
Page 16
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
199
51
996
199
71
998
199
92
000
200
12
002
200
32
004
200
52
006
200
72
008
200
92
010
201
12
012
201
32
014
Q1
20
15
$ M
illion
s
Other (Includes fund of funds, mezzanine, and secondaries)VentureBuyout/Corporate Finance
Investment Performance: Private Equity This section provides data on private equity industry performance, fundraising, buyout funds, initial public offering (IPO) activity and venture capital. The information in this section reflects the most recent private equity data available.
Private Equity Performance by Vintage Year and Investment Horizon: All Regions
Private Equity Commitments: United States
Private Equity Industry Performance
The adjacent graph shows private equity fund performance for Q4 2014, calculated as pooled internal rates of return (IRRs) of funds reporting to Thomson One. Performance for 2008 through 2012 vintage-year* funds, as well as one-, five-, 10- and 20-year returns is calculated for funds in the following categories: all private equity, venture capital and buyouts. Private equity funds for all regions returned approximately 3.4 percent in Q4 2014 and 11.8 percent over the one-year per iod. This includes performance across all private equity strategies. Over a 20-year period, all private equity, venture capital and buyout funds generated double-digit returns of 14.6 percent, 28.0 percent and 13.2 percent, respectively.
*“Vintage year” refers to the first year capital was committed in a particular fund. Vintage-year performance is calculated as the median percentile returns of all funds reporting as pooled IRRs.
Private Equity Overview
According to Private Equity Analyst, private equity funds raised $66.1 billion in Q1 2015, the strongest first quarter result since Q1 2008. The potent exit environment over the past several years, especially in 2014, supplied institutional investors with capital to reinvest in new funds. Additionally, copious cheap debt and a fairly stable U.S. economy led to increased buyout activity, although there are pricing concerns and some limits on leveraged lending. Corporate finance funds, particularly industry-focused and energy-related vehicles, along with secondary funds, saw the greatest gains over Q1 2014. Energy-related funds raised approximately $20.1 billion, which is triple the capital those funds garnered one year prior. Secondaries, which had a record year in 2014 in terms of deal volume, raised $4.2 billion in Q1, more than double the funding of Q1 2014. Venture capital, mezzanine and fund of funds raised less capital than they did one year ago. After a record-high year for exits in 2014, Q1 2015 experienced the slowest exit activity in two years. Seventeen venture-backed IPOs raised $1.4 billion, which was 54 percent less in number of offerings and 58 percent less in dollars versus Q1 2014. Although Q1 results were weak, activity is expected to increase throughout 2015, as 54 venture-backed companies have filed publicly for IPOs with the SEC, and more registrations have likely been filed confidentially under the JOBS Act*. Venture-backed M&A activity decelerated to its lowest levels since Q1 2013 with 86 deals, 16 of which are disclosed and total $2.1 billion. Buyout exit activity also slowed from Q4 and one year ago, but disclosed deal volume remained strong at $33.3 billion versus $35.2 billion in Q4, which was one of the best quarterly exit deal volume totals of the decade. Source: The Private Equity Analyst
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 15
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
201
2
201
1
201
0
200
9
200
8
1 Y
ear
5 Y
ear
10
Yea
r
20
Yea
r
Hor
izon
Ret
urns
(P
oole
d IR
Rs)
Vintage Year
Total PE Venture Capital Buyouts
Investment Horizon
Source: Thomson Reuters
Venture capital deal activity reached $13.4 billion, which was less than Q4 by 10 percent, but was the highest Q1 total since 2000 and 26 percent greater than the amount invested in Q1 2014. Buyout deals totaled $34.9 billion, an increase of approximately 13 percent over Q1 2014. *The JOBS Act was signed into U.S. law in 2012 to encourage small business/startup growth by easing regulatory requirements on emerging growth companies and allowing crowdfunding, with limitations, from private individuals. Under the JOBS Act, if an emerging growth company decides to go public, it submits an initial, confidential registration to the SEC for feedback before its privately held information becomes public. Page 17
Investment Performance: Real Estate This page presents data and Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary on private and public real estate. The information below reflects the most recent data available.
National Property Index Sector and Region Performance
Regional Real Estate Securities Performance
Private Real Estate
Public Real Estate The FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed Real Estate Index total market capitalization declined to $1.2 trillion in Q2, broken down as follows: North America $683 billion, Europe $209 billion, and Asia $351 billion. Despite strong property valuations and transaction activity in the U.S., rising interest rates led to a 6.7 percent loss on a global basis in Q2. Asia (-1.8 percent) lost less than Europe (-3.3 percent) and the U.S. (-10.0 percent) as measured by the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT indices. Sector performance in the U.S. was negative across the board: Specialty Office (-0.5 percent), Manufactured Home Communities (-4.7 percent), Self Storage (-5.0 percent), Apartments (-6.1 percent), and Lodging (-6.2 percent) fell substantially, but outperformed the broader index, while Healthcare (-14.3 percent), Primary CBD Office (-13.1 percent), Shopping Centers (-12.6 percent), Net Lease (-12.5 percent), Industrial (-12.4 percent) and Student Apartments (-11.8 percent) declined more sharply than the index. Property stocks in Europe were negatively affected by concern over Greece and higher bond yields. The U.K. (3.9 percent), Greece (0.5 percent) and Spain (-1.0 percent) outperformed Europe (-3.3 percent), while Finland (-14.9 percent), Sweden (-9.9 percent), France (-9.5 percent), Germany (-8.2 percent) and Ireland (-7.0 percent) fell more than the region as a whole. Asia fell, primarily due to lower economic and earnings growth expectations in Japan. Hong Kong (4.0 percent) gained while New Zealand (-7.7 percent), Japan (-5.1 percent) and Singapore (-2.0 percent) declined.
Source: National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 16
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
Q2 12 Q4 12 Q2 13 Q4 13 Q2 14 Q4 14 Q2 15
U.S. Europe Asia
The National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) Property Index (NPI), which tracks private real estate in the U.S., gained 3.1 percent during Q2. The total return is composed of 1.3 percent income and 1.9 percent property-level appreciation. Over the trailing one-year period, the Index gained 13.0 percent, composed of 7.5 percent property-level appreciation and 5.2 percent income. In the regions of the U.S., the West performed the best during Q2 and over the last 12 months, as shown in the adjacent table. Property valuations continue to strengthen due to solid operating fundamentals and demand from investors for high-quality assets. The increase in interest rates during Q2 did not reduce investor demand and private core real estate values remain, on average, 15 percent above the peak levels reached in 2007. Supply is building in markets with strong tenant demand and rent growth albeit more slowly than previous cycles with the exception of the apartment sector where construction starts have risen to historical norms. There is also increasing supply in the office and industrial sectors, but most consists of build-to-suit/pre-leased buildings. Source: National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries
Returns as of Q2 2015
Ending
Weight (%) QTD (%) 1 Year (%)
NCREIF NPI Total Return 100.0 3.1 13.0 Sector Apartment 24.1 3.0 11.6 Hotel 1.3 3.5 14.0 Industrial 13.2 3.8 14.8 Office 38.1 3.1 12.9 Retail 23.3 3.0 13.6 NCREIF Region East 34.2 2.9 11.0 Midwest 9.4 3.0 12.5 South 20.4 3.1 13.9 West 36.0 3.4 14.5
Page 18
Investment Performance: Real Estate This page presents data and Segal Rogerscasey’s commentary on value-added and opportunistic real estate. The information in this section reflects the most recent data available.
Closed-End Private Real Estate Funds Median Net IRRs and Quartile Boundaries by Vintage Year
Closed-End Private Real Estate Index Performance
Value-Added and Opportunistic Real Estate
Value-added and opportunistic private real estate strategies have attracted investor interest over the last few years due, in part, to the economic recovery, the strong overall performance of these strategies, and high core real estate valuations. According to Preqin, during Q2, 23 value-added and 7 opportunistic funds closed raising $9.6 billion and $7.2 billion, respectively, while 6 debt funds closed raising $6.0 billion. As shown in the graph below at left, the returns earned by investors in their closed-end, private, value-added, opportunistic, and real estate debt portfolios have steadily recovered from the lows set in late 2009 and early 2010; however, real estate debt funds have outperformed. Furthermore, as illustrated in the graph below at right, closed-end private real estate dry powder has risen with increased investor interest in these strategies. Lastly, as shown in the graph at right, closed-end private real estate funds of vintage years 2005 (0.1 percent) and 2006 (0.0 percent) have the lowest median net IRRs in recent history, while the last two years for which data is available show continued improvement with the median net IRRs of 2011 and 2012 funds rising to 15.0 percent and 12.8 percent, respectively.
Source (this page): Preqin Real Estate Online
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 17
Closed-End Private Real Estate Dry Powder ($ billion) by Strategy
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
Dec
-06
Dec
-07
Dec
-08
Dec
-09
Dec
-10
Dec
-11
Dec
-12
Dec
-13
Dec
-14
Jun-
15
Core Core-Plus Value-Added
Opportunistic Distressed Debt
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dec
-07
Mar
-08
Jun-
08
Sep
-08
Dec
-08
Mar
-09
Jun-
09
Sep
-09
Dec
-09
Mar
-10
Jun-
10
Sep
-10
Dec
-10
Mar
-11
Jun-
11
Sep
-11
Dec
-11
Mar
-12
Jun-
12
Sep
-12
Dec
-12
Mar
-13
Jun-
13
Sep
-13
Dec
-13
Mar
-14
Jun-
14
Sep
-14
Value-Added Index Opportunistic Index Debt Index
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
Top Quartile Median Bottom Quartile
Page 19
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
May-11 May-12 May-13 May-14 May-15
U.S. Exports U.S. Dollar Index
$18 $23
$69 $60
$109 $114 $111
$264 $210
$187 $144
$123 $82
$51
$3.8 $4.0 $4.3 $4.5 $4.6 $4.8 $5.3 $5.4
$5.9 $6.5 $6.6
$7.0 $7.5
$7.8
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000
201
4
201
3
201
2
201
1
201
0
200
9
200
8
200
7
200
6
200
5
200
4
200
3
200
2
200
1
Investment Grade & High Yield Corporate Dealer Inventory (Billions)Investment Grade & High Yield Corporate Bonds Outstanding (Trillions)
Noteworthy Developments Segal Rogerscasey finds the developments discussed in this section to be noteworthy for investors.
Investment Grade and High Yield Corporate Bonds Outstanding vs. Dealer Inventory
A Liquidity Challenged Bond Market The adjacent graph highlights the declining role of traditional broker-dealers in fixed income markets, which is widely believed to have a negative impact on liquidity and volatility. While there is evidence of higher bid/ask spreads and increased price sensitivity to asset flows from mutual funds and ETFs, there are a number of other considerations worth noting. For example, demand has been exceptionally strong, with new issuance often significantly oversubscribed; long term-oriented and patient institutional investors, both in the U.S. and abroad, have also increasingly stepped in as opportunistic buyers; and institutions continue to build out and improve electronic trading platforms and other related activities. Finally, while probably far from perfect, it is important to remember that one of the primary objectives of financial reform was to remove systemic risks in the banking system in an effort to avert or mitigate the next financial crisis.
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 18
Sources: FINRA, SIFMA, Federal Reserve
Sources: Bloomberg and The U.S. Census Bureau
The Strong U.S. Dollar’s Effect on Exports and The Economy
The adjacent graph compares the USD to exports. As a result of a strong USD’s effect on exports, foreign companies and consumers of U.S. goods and services could experience higher prices, which might create a headwind for GDP growth and the earnings of U.S. companies selling abroad. In addition, U.S. companies with large foreign operations could see a decline in earnings when converted back to USD. However, a stronger USD would also lower the price of imports, including commodities such as oil prices, which benefits U.S. consumers. It is uncertain whether this would spur them to import more or simply benefit from an increase in disposable income. In the case of both exports and imports, the potential impact could be a modest headwind to U.S. GDP growth and inflation, both of which could impact the timing and magnitude of any Fed interest rate increases. In May, the trade deficit increased by 2.9 percent to $41.9 billion as imports declined by 0.8 percent and exports fell by 0.8 percent. Ultimately, the impact of a stronger USD creates some uncertainty and is difficult to forecast given all the moving pieces of the global economy.
U.S. Exports vs. The U.S. Dollar Index
Page 20
Noteworthy Developments Segal Rogerscasey finds the developments discussed in this section to be noteworthy for investors.
Investment Synopsis Review of Q2 2015 page 19
* U.S. median does not include Puerto Rico Source: Moody’s Investors Service
Puerto Rico’s Debt Crisis Debt Per Capita
A combination of factors from U.S. tax law to economic misfortune and mismanagement has turned the Puerto Rican debt burden into a crisis of Greek-like proportions. The island’s own governor, Alejandro García Padilla, announced in June that Puerto Rico’s debts are “not payable.” The outstanding debt at $72 billion is more than any state’s except for California and New York, but the territory of Puerto Rico has the population of San Diego county and shrinking. Puerto Rico’s debt per capita is about 15 times the U.S. median, and three times as much as Connecticut, the state with the highest debt per capita. With no provision for bankruptcy process and no ability to print money, options are few and solutions are likely to result in years of court battles.
Job Separations: Voluntary Quits vs. Layoffs/Discharges
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Another Way to Measure Labor Market Improvement According to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, total job separations, which comprise quits and layoffs and discharges, grew 7.2 percent during 2014, but voluntary quits contributed significantly more to that increase (10.4 percent vs. 2.7 percent). As shown in the adjacent graph, layoffs and discharges outnumbered voluntary quits during the financial crisis and shortly thereafter, but the gap between voluntary quits and involuntary separations has widened over the past several years, especially from 2012 onward, when involuntary job departures stabilized while voluntary separations climbed. An increase in voluntary quits is a good indicator of labor market improvement because it suggests that workers feel comfortable enough in future prospects to leave their current positions. Decreased layoffs and discharges are indicative of employer confidence, but they are also a result of an increased number of quits. The expanding spread between the two types of departures paints a positive picture of the job market and is good news for the U.S. economy as a whole.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Dec
-00
Jun-
01
Dec
-01
Jun-
02
Dec
-02
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Dec
-11
Jun-
12
Dec
-12
Jun-
13
Dec
-13
Jun-
14
Dec
-14
Quits Layoffs & Discharges
$15,637
$1,012
$5,491
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000
Puerto Rico
U.S. Median*
Highest State
Page 21
Total Plan
Page 22
Beginning Market Value $298,913 ReturnSept Qtr. -3.0%
Net External Growth* 6,985 Dec Qtr. -0.6%
Return on Investment Mar Qtr. 1.7%Return on Investment -4,189
Jun Qtr. 0.7%
Ending Market Value $301,710 Fiscal Year-to-Date -1.3%
*Contributions and transfers less distributions
7/1/2014 - 6/30/2015
ASSET GROWTH($000's)
7/1/2014 - 6/30/2015
Fiscal Year to Date as of June 30, 2015City of Springfield Police & Firefighter Retirement System
INVESTMENTPERFORMANCE
Page 23
Large Cap Small Cap InternationalEquities Equities Equities Bonds Real Estate Alternatives Total %
Large Cap Equity
SSgA-S&P $48,346 $48,346 16.0% -Passive
Small Cap Equity
SSgA-Russell 2000 $21,291 $21,291 7.1% -Passive
International Equity
Pictet $51,468 $51,468 17.1%
Wells Fargo $23,506 $23,506 7.8% -Emerging Markets
Fixed Income
Galliard $42,399 $42,399 14.1% -Intermediate Duration
SSgA- US TIPS $16,494 $16,494 5.5% -Passive
Brandywine $28,590 $28,590 9.5% -International
Pyramis $13,784 $13,784 4.6% -Emerging MarketsReal Estate
PRISA $12,508 $12,508 4.1%
Alternatives
SSgA-Bloomberg Commodity $13,043 $13,043 4.3%
Blackstone $15,312 $15,312 5.1% -Fund of Funds
Entrust $14,967 $14,967 5.0% -Fund of Funds
Total Assets $48,346 $21,291 $74,974 $101,268 $12,508 $43,322 $301,710 100.0%
Actual Allocation 16.0% 7.1% 24.8% 33.6% 4.1% 14.4% 100.0%Target Allocation (Long-Term) 12.0% 4.0% 25.0% 39.0% 5.0% 15.0% 100.0%
Custom Index S&P 500 Russell 2000 MSCI EAFE Net/ MSCI EM
BarCap Int. Agg/BarCap US
Treasury/ Citi WGBIxUS
NCREIFDJ UBS
Commodity/ HFRI FOF
Composite
Springfield Police & Firefighters Retirement PlanAsset / Manager Allocation Summary (000's)
June 30, 2015
Page 24
Asset Allocation by Segment
SegmentsMarket Value
($)Allocation
(%)
Domestic Equity 69,636,755 23.08
Domestic Fixed Income 58,325,959 19.33
International Equity 48,767,608 16.16
Alternative Investment 43,322,455 14.36
International Fixed Income 42,374,600 14.04
Emerging Equity 23,506,296 7.79
Real Estate 12,508,292 4.15
Cash Equivalent 3,267,656 1.08
Performance Bar Chart
Total Plan Policy Index
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
-8.00
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 2014 2013 2012
0.291.67
-1.53
7.918.98
1.81
14.58
10.72
0.70
2.42
-1.27
8.229.43
1.07
14.7913.65
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total Plan
Beginning Market Value 299,766,871 288,556,786 298,913,251 205,943,723 132,774,713
Net Cash Flows -168,258 5,753,383 6,448,608 37,251,029 72,984,292
Income - 348,728 992,190 4,234,298 7,863,432
Gain/Loss 2,111,008 7,050,724 -4,644,429 54,280,571 88,087,184
Ending Market Value 301,709,621 301,709,621 301,709,621 301,709,621 301,709,621
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total Plan
As of June 30, 2015
Page 25
Target Allocation Actual Allocation Allocation Differences
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%-10.0 %-20.0 %
Total Alternatives
$43,322,455
Total Real Estate
$12,508,292
Total International Fixed Income
$42,374,603
Total Domestic Fixed Income
$58,893,610
Total International Equity$74,973,904
Total Domestic Equity
$69,636,757
15.0%
5.0%
14.0%
25.0%
25.0%
16.0%
14.4%
4.1%
14.0%
19.5%
24.8%
23.1%
-0.6 %
-0.9 %
0.0%
-5.5 %
-0.2 %
7.1%
AssetAllocation
($)
AssetAllocation
(%)
TargetAllocation
(%)Differences
(%)
MinimumAllocation
(%)
MaximumAllocation
(%)
Total Plan 301,709,621 100.00 100.00 0.00 N/A N/A
Total Domestic Equity 69,636,757 23.08 16.00 7.08 11.00 21.00
Total International Equity 74,973,904 24.85 25.00 -0.15 19.00 31.00
Total Domestic Fixed Income 58,893,610 19.52 25.00 -5.48 10.00 33.00
Total International Fixed Income 42,374,603 14.04 14.00 0.04 9.00 19.00
Total Real Estate 12,508,292 4.15 5.00 -0.85 3.00 7.00
Total Alternatives 43,322,455 14.36 15.00 -0.64 10.00 20.00
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total Plan
As of June 30, 2015
Page 26
Total Fund
($) %
Total Plan 301,709,621 100.00
Total Domestic Equity 69,636,757 23.08
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 48,346,058 16.02
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 21,290,699 7.06
Total Non-U.S./International Equity 74,973,904 24.85
Pictet International Equity 51,467,608 17.06
Wells Emerging Market Equity 23,506,296 7.79
Total Domestic Fixed Income 58,893,610 19.52
Galliard Intermediate Fixed Income 42,399,362 14.05
SSgA TIPS Index Fund 16,494,248 5.47
Total Non-U.S./International Fixed Income 42,374,603 14.04
Brandywine International Fixed Income 28,590,156 9.48
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 13,784,447 4.57
Total Real Estate 12,508,292 4.15
PRISA 12,508,292 4.15
Total Alternatives 43,322,455 14.36
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund 13,043,480 4.32
EnTrust Diversified Fund 14,966,989 4.96
Blackstone Partners NT 15,311,987 5.08
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Asset Allocation
As of June 30, 2015
Page 27
Allocation
Market Value($000) %
Performance (%)
1Quarter
Year ToDate
1Year
3Years
5Years
7Years
10Years
SinceInception
InceptionDate
Total Plan 301,710 100.00 0.70 2.42 -1.27 8.22 9.43 4.92 4.73 4.91 04/01/2005
Policy Index 0.29 1.67 -1.53 7.91 8.98 4.87 5.57 5.56
Total Domestic Equity 69,637 23.08 0.29 2.24 6.98 17.34 17.27 9.57 8.02 8.33 04/01/2005
Domestic Equity Index 0.34 2.31 6.75 17.29 17.39 9.76 8.33 8.38
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 48,346 16.02 0.26 1.19 7.39 17.30 17.34 N/A N/A 17.34 07/01/2010
S&P 500 0.28 1.23 7.42 17.31 17.34 9.42 7.89 17.34
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 21,291 7.06 0.36 4.70 6.48 17.85 17.14 N/A N/A 17.14 07/01/2010
Russell 2000 Index 0.42 4.75 6.49 17.81 17.08 10.44 8.40 17.08
Total International Equity 74,974 24.85 2.82 7.62 -4.81 9.93 8.88 1.03 N/A 0.31 05/01/2007
International Equity Index 0.67 4.70 -4.44 10.54 8.69 1.41 4.71 0.06
Pictet 51,468 17.06 3.32 10.21 -4.09 11.53 9.83 1.65 N/A 1.27 04/01/2008
MSCI EAFE (Net) 0.62 5.52 -4.22 11.97 9.54 1.97 5.12 1.59
Wells 23,506 7.79 1.74 2.34 -6.22 N/A N/A N/A N/A -0.79 01/01/2013
MSCI EM (net) 0.69 2.95 -5.12 3.71 3.69 0.86 8.11 -0.77
Total Domestic Fixed Income 58,894 19.52 -0.68 0.75 1.15 2.02 3.60 5.14 4.08 4.20 04/01/2005
Domestic Fixed Income Index -0.78 0.56 1.01 1.20 2.52 3.72 3.88 4.03
Galliard 42,399 14.05 -0.52 0.99 2.24 2.76 4.06 5.51 N/A 5.51 07/01/2008
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate -0.67 0.64 1.89 1.74 2.89 4.16 4.22 4.16
SSgA TIPS Index Fund 16,494 5.47 -1.10 0.33 -1.77 -0.77 N/A N/A N/A -0.93 06/01/2012
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -1.06 0.34 -1.73 -0.76 3.29 3.51 4.14 -0.92
Total International Fixed Income 42,375 14.04 -1.39 -1.70 -6.39 2.25 5.14 4.81 N/A 5.43 05/01/2007
International Fixed Income Index -1.15 -3.87 -9.97 -2.32 1.30 1.64 3.12 3.17
Brandywine 28,590 9.48 -2.58 -4.29 -8.47 1.40 4.61 4.44 N/A 5.11 05/01/2007
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -1.54 -5.83 -13.49 -3.88 0.32 0.94 2.63 2.56
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 13,784 4.57 1.18 4.06 -2.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.74 09/01/2013
JPM EMBI Global Diversified -0.34 1.67 0.51 4.30 6.76 7.67 7.45 7.29
Total Real Estate 12,508 4.15 3.25 5.36 12.86 12.41 14.49 2.59 N/A 2.77 10/01/2007
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.92 7.45 14.52 12.88 14.27 3.18 6.57 3.43
PRISA 12,508 4.15 3.25 5.36 12.86 12.41 14.49 2.59 N/A 2.77 10/01/2007
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.92 7.45 14.52 12.88 14.27 3.18 6.57 3.43
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015
Page 28
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015Allocation
Market Value($000) %
Performance (%)
1Quarter
Year ToDate
1Year
3Years
5Years
7Years
10Years
SinceInception
InceptionDate
Total Alternatives 43,322 14.36 1.06 0.64 -7.79 -1.46 N/A N/A N/A -4.88 07/01/2011
Alternatives Index 1.61 1.08 -7.29 -2.10 0.25 -8.18 -0.54 -5.31
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund 13,043 4.32 4.60 -1.71 -23.89 -8.89 N/A N/A N/A -11.87 05/01/2011
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.66 -1.56 -23.71 -8.76 -3.91 -10.91 -2.62 -12.02
EnTrust 14,967 4.96 -1.39 0.56 -1.50 N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.64 02/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 0.93 2.62 4.70
Blackstone Partners NT 15,312 5.08 0.59 2.80 4.94 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.46 08/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 0.93 2.62 4.59
Page 29
Performance (%)
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Total Plan 1.07 14.79 13.65 -0.33 13.48 17.92 -27.05 6.97 7.43 N/A
Policy Index 1.81 14.58 10.72 0.36 12.27 15.92 -23.21 7.83 14.65 5.38
Total Domestic Equity 10.85 34.54 15.74 0.16 18.53 28.76 -37.41 2.54 15.01 N/A
Domestic Equity Index 10.55 34.24 16.04 0.07 19.54 29.42 -37.34 5.73 15.88 6.32
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 13.64 32.46 16.05 2.09 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
S&P 500 13.69 32.39 16.00 2.11 15.06 26.46 -37.00 5.49 15.79 4.91
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 5.00 38.87 16.36 -4.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Russell 2000 Index 4.89 38.82 16.35 -4.18 26.85 27.17 -33.79 -1.57 18.37 4.55
Total International Equity -8.97 18.52 23.07 -14.69 10.75 41.21 -50.31 N/A N/A N/A
International Equity Index -4.00 17.93 17.32 -12.14 7.75 31.78 -43.38 11.17 26.34 13.54
Pictet -11.25 23.98 23.07 -14.69 10.75 41.21 N/A N/A N/A N/A
MSCI EAFE (Net) -4.90 22.78 17.32 -12.14 7.75 31.78 -43.38 11.17 26.34 13.54
Wells -3.84 -0.39 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
MSCI EM (net) -2.19 -2.60 18.23 -18.42 18.88 78.51 -53.33 39.38 32.18 34.00
Total Domestic Fixed Income 4.54 -2.04 6.30 6.73 8.00 14.54 -3.01 4.58 1.29 N/A
Domestic Fixed Income Index 3.89 -2.41 3.68 5.80 5.89 5.24 5.08 7.39 4.07 1.57
Galliard 4.98 -0.55 6.36 6.73 8.00 14.54 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 4.12 -1.02 3.56 5.97 6.15 6.46 4.86 7.02 4.57 2.01
SSgA TIPS Index Fund 3.63 -8.62 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.64 -8.61 6.98 13.56 6.31 11.41 -2.35 11.63 0.49 2.84
Total International Fixed Income 2.69 -1.83 13.91 5.11 7.43 10.27 2.41 N/A N/A N/A
International Fixed Income Index -0.06 -4.45 1.50 5.17 5.21 4.36 10.10 11.47 6.97 -9.21
Brandywine 2.63 -1.63 13.91 5.11 7.43 10.27 2.41 N/A N/A N/A
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -2.68 -4.56 1.50 5.17 5.21 4.36 10.10 11.47 6.97 -9.21
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 2.69 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 7.43 -5.25 17.44 7.34 12.24 29.83 -12.01 6.15 9.87 10.25
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015
Page 30
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015
Performance (%)
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Total Real Estate 13.34 14.69 9.67 19.08 18.43 -34.25 -12.96 N/A N/A N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 12.28 13.34 11.03 15.96 16.14 -30.65 -10.37 16.08 16.15 20.18
PRISA 13.34 14.69 9.67 19.08 18.43 -34.25 -12.96 N/A N/A N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 12.28 13.34 11.03 15.96 16.14 -30.65 -10.37 16.08 16.15 20.18
Total Alternatives -4.11 -3.37 -1.23 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Alternatives Index -4.40 -5.48 -1.06 -13.32 16.83 18.91 -35.65 16.23 2.07 21.36
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund -17.15 -9.57 0.15 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -17.01 -9.52 -1.06 -13.32 16.83 18.91 -35.65 16.23 2.07 21.36
EnTrust 1.69 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 3.14 7.70 4.22 -3.55 5.07 9.65 -19.86 7.68 9.21 5.13
Blackstone Partners NT 5.77 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 3.14 7.70 4.22 -3.55 5.07 9.65 -19.86 7.68 9.21 5.13
Page 31
Performance (%)
Jul-2014To
Jun-2015
Jul-2013To
Jun-2014
Jul-2012To
Jun-2013
Jul-2011To
Jun-2012
Jul-2010To
Jun-2011
Jul-2009To
Jun-2010
Jul-2008To
Jun-2009
Jul-2007To
Jun-2008
Jul-2006To
Jun-2007
Jul-2005To
Jun-2006
Total Plan -1.27 15.14 11.50 0.75 22.86 11.12 -19.72 -4.49 11.89 6.12
Policy Index -1.53 15.78 10.23 0.13 22.16 9.54 -17.13 -3.78 15.81 10.59
Total Domestic Equity 6.98 24.53 21.27 3.12 33.12 16.41 -26.57 -12.73 13.65 15.01
S&P 500 7.42 24.61 20.60 5.45 30.69 14.43 -26.21 -13.12 20.59 8.63
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 7.39 24.57 20.64 5.43 30.71 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
S&P 500 7.42 24.61 20.60 5.45 30.69 14.43 -26.21 -13.12 20.59 8.63
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 6.48 23.70 24.25 -2.08 37.63 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Russell 2000 Index 6.49 23.64 24.21 -2.08 37.41 21.48 -25.01 -16.19 16.43 14.58
Total International Equity -4.81 17.92 18.35 -12.86 32.19 8.85 -35.52 -8.14 N/A N/A
International Equity Index -4.44 21.70 16.14 -13.83 30.36 5.92 -31.35 -10.61 27.00 26.56
Pictet -4.09 19.86 20.69 -12.86 32.19 8.85 -35.52 N/A N/A N/A
MSCI EAFE (Net) -4.22 23.57 18.62 -13.83 30.36 5.92 -31.35 -10.61 27.00 26.56
Wells -6.22 11.43 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
MSCI EM (net) -5.12 14.31 2.87 -15.94 27.80 23.15 -28.07 4.63 44.99 35.47
Total Domestic Fixed Income 1.15 4.65 0.30 6.38 5.68 12.61 5.67 1.75 6.18 -2.78
Domestic Fixed Income Index 1.01 3.71 -1.05 5.28 3.80 8.29 5.27 7.37 5.76 -0.19
Galliard 2.24 4.66 1.42 6.40 5.68 12.61 5.90 N/A N/A N/A
Barclays Intermed. U.S. Government/Credit 1.68 2.86 0.28 5.42 3.77 8.29 5.27 7.37 5.76 -0.19
SSgA TIPS Index Fund -1.77 4.45 -4.78 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -1.73 4.44 -4.78 11.66 7.74 9.52 -1.11 15.09 4.07 -1.64
Total International Fixed Income -6.39 8.84 4.92 5.74 13.66 6.38 1.67 12.53 N/A N/A
International Fixed Income Index -9.97 9.79 -5.71 0.43 13.93 1.51 3.53 18.72 2.22 0.00
Brandywine -8.47 8.55 4.92 5.74 13.66 6.38 1.67 12.53 N/A N/A
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -13.49 8.88 -5.71 0.43 13.93 1.51 3.53 18.72 2.22 0.00
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt -2.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 0.51 11.64 1.12 9.77 11.38 18.45 2.10 4.95 11.39 4.60
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Comparative Performance
As of June 30, 2015
Performance (%)
Jul-2014To
Jun-2015
Jul-2013To
Jun-2014
Jul-2012To
Jun-2013
Jul-2011To
Jun-2012
Jul-2010To
Jun-2011
Jul-2009To
Jun-2010
Jul-2008To
Jun-2009
Jul-2007To
Jun-2008
Jul-2006To
Jun-2007
Jul-2005To
Jun-2006
Total Real Estate 12.86 13.68 10.72 13.70 21.80 -3.40 -37.06 N/A N/A N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 14.52 12.30 11.84 12.52 20.37 -7.67 -30.79 8.55 17.04 19.45
PRISA 12.86 13.68 10.72 13.70 21.80 -3.40 -37.06 N/A N/A N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 14.52 12.30 11.84 12.52 20.37 -7.67 -30.79 8.55 17.04 19.45
Total Alternatives -7.79 8.81 -4.61 -14.45 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Alternatives Index -7.29 7.15 -5.54 -14.32 25.91 2.75 -47.08 41.56 2.94 18.09
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund -23.89 8.10 -8.06 -13.29 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -23.71 8.21 -8.01 -14.32 25.91 2.75 -47.08 41.56 2.94 18.09
EnTrust -1.50 11.02 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 2.76 6.68 7.22 -3.18 5.22 5.00 -15.13 -0.15 11.23 9.29
Blackstone Partners NT 4.94 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 2.76 6.68 7.22 -3.18 5.22 5.00 -15.13 -0.15 11.23 9.29
Allocation
Market Value($000) %
Performance (%)
1Quarter
Year ToDate
1Year
3Years
5Years
7Years
10Years
SinceInception
InceptionDate
Total Plan 301,710 100.00 0.70 2.38 -1.40 8.07 9.31 4.84 4.67 4.86 04/01/2005
Policy Index 0.29 1.67 -1.53 7.91 8.98 4.87 5.57 5.56
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 48,346 16.02 0.26 1.19 7.39 17.26 17.30 N/A N/A 17.30 07/01/2010
S&P 500 0.28 1.23 7.42 17.31 17.34 9.42 7.89 17.34
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 21,291 7.06 0.36 4.70 6.48 17.78 17.08 N/A N/A 17.08 07/01/2010
Russell 2000 Index 0.42 4.75 6.49 17.81 17.08 10.44 8.40 17.08
Pictet 51,468 17.06 3.32 10.04 -4.24 11.47 9.80 1.63 N/A 1.25 04/01/2008
MSCI EAFE (Net) 0.62 5.52 -4.22 11.97 9.54 1.97 5.12 1.59
Wells 23,506 7.79 1.74 2.34 -6.22 N/A N/A N/A N/A -0.79 01/01/2013
MSCI EM (net) 0.69 2.95 -5.12 3.71 3.69 0.86 8.11 -0.77
Galliard 42,399 14.05 -0.52 0.99 2.24 2.76 4.06 5.51 N/A 5.51 07/01/2008
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate -0.67 0.64 1.89 1.74 2.89 4.16 4.22 4.16
SSgA TIPS Index Fund 16,494 5.47 -1.10 0.33 -1.77 -0.81 N/A N/A N/A -0.96 06/01/2012
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -1.06 0.34 -1.73 -0.76 3.29 3.51 4.14 -0.92
Brandywine 28,590 9.48 -2.58 -4.29 -8.47 1.10 4.33 4.24 N/A 4.93 05/01/2007
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -1.54 -5.83 -13.49 -3.88 0.32 0.94 2.63 2.56
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 13,784 4.57 1.18 4.06 -2.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.74 09/01/2013
JPM EMBI Global Diversified -0.34 1.67 0.51 4.30 6.76 7.67 7.45 7.29
PRISA 12,508 4.15 3.03 5.13 12.12 11.65 13.79 2.14 N/A 2.36 10/01/2007
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.92 7.45 14.52 12.88 14.27 3.18 6.57 3.43
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund 13,043 4.32 4.60 -1.71 -23.89 -9.00 N/A N/A N/A -11.98 05/01/2011
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.66 -1.56 -23.71 -8.76 -3.91 -10.91 -2.62 -12.02
Blackstone Partners NT 15,312 5.08 0.59 2.80 4.94 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.46 08/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 0.93 2.62 4.59
EnTrust 14,967 4.96 -1.39 0.56 -1.50 N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.64 02/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 0.93 2.62 4.70
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Net of Fees
As of June 30, 2015
Page 34
-7.0
-4.0
-1.0
2.0
5.0
8.0
11.0
14.0
17.0
20.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Plan 0.70 (4) 2.42 (39) -1.27 (100) 8.22 (97) 9.43 (90) 4.92 (99) 4.73 (100)¢£
Policy Index 0.29 (16) 1.67 (81) -1.53 (100) 7.91 (99) 8.98 (93) 4.87 (99) 5.57 (96)�
5th Percentile 0.54 3.46 6.08 12.80 12.32 8.20 7.59
1st Quartile 0.07 2.67 4.60 11.64 11.57 7.56 7.04
Median -0.28 2.21 3.81 10.91 10.95 7.02 6.63
3rd Quartile -0.57 1.77 2.69 10.07 10.05 6.54 6.20
95th Percentile -1.06 1.10 0.43 8.54 8.87 5.30 5.58
Population 203 203 203 192 182 167 83
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System All Public Plans <$500MM & 40-70% Total Equity
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 35
-25.0
-10.0
5.0
20.0
35.0
50.0
65.0
80.0A
llo
ca
tio
n (%
)
US Equity Intl. Equity US Fixed Income Intl. Fixed Income Alternative Inv. Real Estate Cash
Total Plan 23.08 (99) 24.85 (7) 19.52 (88) 18.37 (1) 10.04 (45) 4.15 (82) 0.00¢£
5th Percentile 58.23 24.99 40.01 11.19 28.67 11.86 3.12
1st Quartile 51.46 18.16 34.19 5.14 12.85 9.62 1.78
Median 46.73 14.39 29.53 4.75 9.72 6.01 1.01
3rd Quartile 41.36 12.15 23.27 4.42 4.21 4.56 0.55
95th Percentile 27.50 8.50 15.19 3.77 1.47 2.83 0.10
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Plan Sponsor TF Asset Allocation
As of June 30, 2015
All Public Plans <$500MM & 40-70% Total Equity
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on <Periodicity> periodicity.
-55.0
-40.0
-25.0
-10.0
5.0
20.0
35.0
50.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Total Plan 1.07 (100) 14.79 (87) 13.65 (31) -0.33 (59) 13.48 (31) 17.92 (70) -27.05 (81)¢£
Policy Index 1.81 (100) 14.58 (88) 10.72 (92) 0.36 (42) 12.27 (67) 15.92 (89) -23.21 (47)�
5th Percentile 9.11 21.24 15.26 2.87 16.32 27.77 -19.20
1st Quartile 7.88 18.70 13.81 1.19 13.79 22.72 -21.53
Median 6.83 17.40 12.82 -0.06 12.70 20.00 -23.66
3rd Quartile 5.64 15.77 11.79 -1.09 11.83 17.21 -26.08
95th Percentile 3.49 12.57 9.95 -2.48 10.71 14.02 -29.26
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System All Public Plans <$500MM & 40-70% Total Equity
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 37
-40.0
-30.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0R
etu
rn
Jul-2014To
Jun-2015
Jul-2013To
Jun-2014
Jul-2012To
Jun-2013
Jul-2011To
Jun-2012
Jul-2010To
Jun-2011
Jul-2009To
Jun-2010
Jul-2008To
Jun-2009
Jul-2007To
Jun-2008
Jul-2006To
Jun-2007
Jul-2005To
Jun-2006
Total Plan -1.27 (100) 15.14 (89) 11.50 (70) 0.75 (58) 22.86 (25) 11.12 (74) -19.72 (91) -4.49 (52) 11.89 (100) 6.12 (91)¢£
Policy Index -1.53 (100) 15.78 (77) 10.23 (88) 0.13 (73) 22.16 (34) 9.54 (94) -17.13 (73) -3.78 (38) 15.81 (27) 10.59 (23)�
5th Percentile 6.08 19.65 15.59 3.91 25.90 15.82 -11.28 -0.61 16.90 11.65
1st Quartile 4.60 17.95 13.73 2.26 22.82 14.03 -13.67 -2.72 15.98 10.06
Median 3.81 16.76 12.60 1.11 21.23 12.54 -15.30 -4.39 15.28 8.40
3rd Quartile 2.69 15.92 11.33 0.00 20.02 11.03 -17.31 -5.98 14.50 7.85
95th Percentile 0.43 14.47 9.25 -2.10 17.83 8.93 -20.12 -8.24 12.64 5.06
Population 203 263 263 264 252 228 183 114 34 16
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System All Public Plans <$500MM & 40-70% Total Equity
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 38
Risk & Return Plan Sponsor — 3 Years Risk & Return Plan Sponsor — 5 Years
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
15.0
18.0
Re
turn
(%)
2.1 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.3 7.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
ReturnStandardDeviation
Total Plan 8.22 5.08¢£
Policy Index 7.91 5.12�
Median 10.91 4.69¾
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
15.0
Re
turn
(%)
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
ReturnStandardDeviation
Total Plan 9.43 8.98¢£
Policy Index 8.98 8.25�
Median 10.95 8.63¾
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
-2.0
-4.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
6/05 12/05 6/06 12/06 6/07 12/07 6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total CompositeAs of June 30, 2015
Page 39
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-1979
S&P 500 30.00
Russell 2000 Index 10.00
MSCI EAFE (Net) 20.00
Barclays Intermed. U.S. Government/Credit 21.75
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 10.75
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 7.50
May-2011
S&P 500 25.00
Russell 2000 Index 10.00
MSCI EAFE (Net) 20.00
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 24.00
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 11.00
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 5.00
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.00
Jul-2012
S&P 500 32.50
Russell 2000 Index 10.10
MSCI EAFE (Net) 17.20
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 20.30
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 1.50
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.60
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 5.00
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 3.80
Policy Index Weight (%)
Oct-2012
S&P 500 30.48
Russell 2000 Index 9.80
MSCI EAFE (Net) 18.80
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 19.16
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 2.76
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.26
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.58
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.16
Jan-2013
S&P 500 27.60
Russell 2000 Index 9.70
MSCI EAFE (Net) 19.40
MSCI EM (net) 0.00
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 20.50
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 4.40
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.20
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.50
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.70
Apr-2013
S&P 500 23.46
Russell 2000 Index 10.11
MSCI EAFE (Net) 18.97
MSCI EM (net) 3.94
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 19.09
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 4.11
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.32
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.24
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.11
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 1.65
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Policy Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 40
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Policy Index
As of June 30, 2015
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jul-2013
S&P 500 23.55
Russell 2000 Index 10.16
MSCI EAFE (Net) 19.13
MSCI EM (net) 4.69
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 18.81
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.84
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.15
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.35
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.65
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 1.67
Oct-2013
S&P 500 21.32
Russell 2000 Index 9.33
MSCI EAFE (Net) 19.84
MSCI EM (net) 6.15
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 16.21
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.62
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 8.66
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 1.53
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.17
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.44
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 4.73
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-2014
S&P 500 21.74
Russell 2000 Index 9.36
MSCI EAFE (Net) 18.69
MSCI EM (net) 6.39
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 14.28
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.27
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 7.98
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 2.86
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.94
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.06
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 7.43
Apr-2014
S&P 500 20.05
Russell 2000 Index 8.97
MSCI EAFE (Net) 18.44
MSCI EM (net) 6.65
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 14.28
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.63
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 8.59
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 3.32
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.93
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.27
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 7.87
Page 41
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Policy Index
As of June 30, 2015
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jul-2014
S&P 500 15.07
Russell 2000 Index 8.08
MSCI EAFE (Net) 17.98
MSCI EM (net) 8.06
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 13.97
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 4.29
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 10.11
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 3.64
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.84
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.73
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 9.23
Oct-2014
S&P 500 15.66
Russell 2000 Index 6.37
MSCI EAFE (Net) 17.03
MSCI EM (net) 8.34
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 14.35
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 4.65
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 10.42
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 3.66
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.04
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 5.20
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 10.28
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-2015
S&P 500 16.55
Russell 2000 Index 7.05
MSCI EAFE (Net) 16.21
MSCI EM (net) 7.96
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 14.55
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 4.69
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 10.35
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 3.55
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.17
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.60
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 10.32
Apr-2015
S&P 500 16.10
Russell 2000 Index 7.08
MSCI EAFE (Net) 16.63
MSCI EM (net) 7.71
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 14.23
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 5.57
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 9.80
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 4.55
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 4.02
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.16
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 10.15
Page 42
Periods Ending
BeginningMarket Value
($)
NetCash Flow
($)Gain/Loss
($)
EndingMarket Value
($) %Return
From 05/2005 117,150,890 338,568 11,601,373 129,090,831 9.83
2006 129,090,831 -3,993,870 9,319,186 134,416,147 7.43
2007 134,416,147 -5,281,974 8,447,581 137,581,754 6.97
2008 137,581,754 -2,100,144 -36,685,098 98,796,512 -27.05
2009 98,796,512 12,400,542 18,235,156 129,432,209 17.92
2010 129,432,209 16,068,071 18,682,698 164,182,977 13.48
2011 164,182,977 18,269,378 2,686,289 185,138,644 -0.33
2012 185,138,644 16,295,813 26,109,286 227,543,743 13.65
2013 227,543,743 19,961,190 34,481,323 281,986,256 14.79
2014 281,986,256 3,888,884 2,681,645 288,556,786 1.07
To 06/2015 288,556,786 5,753,383 7,399,452 301,709,621 2.42
117,150,890 81,599,841 102,958,890 301,709,621 65.84
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Schedule of Investable Assets
Since Inception Ending June 30, 2015
Gain/Loss includes income received and change in accrued income for the period.
Page 43
Investment Manager Performance
Page 44
Total Equity
Page 45
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total Domestic Equity
Beginning Market Value 69,433,988 68,112,214 69,174,020 86,724,999 50,453,889
Net Cash Flows - - -4,000,000 -55,596,727 -40,513,019
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 202,769 1,524,543 4,462,737 38,508,485 59,695,887
Ending Market Value 69,636,757 69,636,757 69,636,757 69,636,757 69,636,757
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
3.0
6.0
-3.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
6/05 12/05 6/06 12/06 6/07 12/07 6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Domestic Equity 0.29 2.24 6.98 17.34 17.27 9.57 8.02
Domestic Equity Index 0.34 2.31 6.75 17.29 17.39 9.76 8.33
Difference -0.05 -0.07 0.23 0.05 -0.12 -0.19 -0.31
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total Domestic EquityAs of June 30, 2015
Page 46
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Domestic Equity 0.29 (38) 2.24 (56) 6.98 (55) 17.34 (72) 17.27 (67) 9.57 (74) 8.02 (88)¢£
Domestic Equity Index 0.34 (35) 2.31 (56) 6.75 (56) 17.29 (72) 17.39 (63) 9.76 (66) 8.33 (62)�
5th Percentile 2.20 7.81 12.57 22.32 20.72 12.37 11.41
1st Quartile 0.85 3.98 8.24 19.63 18.94 10.73 8.85
Median 0.14 2.54 7.26 18.09 17.79 9.96 8.43
3rd Quartile -0.80 1.87 4.50 16.89 16.82 9.47 8.21
95th Percentile -1.71 -0.65 -3.61 13.63 14.42 6.15 6.74
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. All Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 47
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Total Domestic Equity 10.85 (53) 34.54 (47) 15.74 (58) 0.16 (51) 18.53 (31) 28.76 (44) -37.41 (67)¢£
Domestic Equity Index 10.55 (55) 34.24 (53) 16.04 (55) 0.07 (51) 19.54 (26) 29.42 (40) -37.34 (66)�
5th Percentile 14.58 46.54 23.67 4.80 24.57 47.87 -26.23
1st Quartile 12.64 37.49 18.82 1.75 19.55 32.45 -34.03
Median 11.16 34.46 16.27 0.29 16.98 28.01 -36.41
3rd Quartile 7.26 31.88 13.26 -2.23 14.78 23.94 -38.89
95th Percentile 3.70 27.33 9.97 -7.11 10.64 18.87 -43.33
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. All Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 48
Policy Index Weight (%)
Mar-1971
Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index (full-cap) 100.00
Sep-2010
S&P 500 67.00
Russell 2000 Index 33.00
Jul-2012
S&P 500 76.30
Russell 2000 Index 23.70
Oct-2012
S&P 500 75.70
Russell 2000 Index 24.30
Jan-2013
S&P 500 74.00
Russell 2000 Index 26.00
Apr-2013
S&P 500 69.90
Russell 2000 Index 30.10
Jul-2013
S&P 500 69.90
Russell 2000 Index 30.10
Oct-2013
S&P 500 69.60
Russell 2000 Index 30.40
Jan-2014
S&P 500 69.90
Russell 2000 Index 30.10
Policy Index Weight (%)
Apr-2014
S&P 500 69.09
Russell 2000 Index 30.91
Jul-2014
S&P 500 65.08
Russell 2000 Index 34.92
Oct-2014
S&P 500 71.08
Russell 2000 Index 28.92
Jan-2015
S&P 500 70.17
Russell 2000 Index 29.83
Apr-2015
S&P 500 69.46
Russell 2000 Index 30.54
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Domestic Equity Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 49
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund
Beginning Market Value 48,219,428 47,776,952 45,020,372 66,157,051 2,601,000
Net Cash Flows - - - -44,808,615 -6,359,709
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 126,630 569,106 3,325,687 26,997,623 52,104,767
Ending Market Value 48,346,058 48,346,058 48,346,058 48,346,058 48,346,058
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
0.1
-0.1
-0.2
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/10 12/10 3/11 6/11 9/11 12/11 3/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 0.26 1.19 7.39 17.30 17.34 N/A N/A
S&P 500 0.28 1.23 7.42 17.31 17.34 9.42 7.89
Difference -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 -0.01 0.00 N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA S&P 500 Flagship FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 50
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 0.26 (50) 1.19 (68) 7.39 (62) 17.30 (67) 17.34 (61) N/A N/A¢£
S&P 500 0.28 (49) 1.23 (67) 7.42 (61) 17.31 (67) 17.34 (61) 9.42 (63) 7.89 (80)�
5th Percentile 2.13 6.04 14.30 22.06 20.49 11.90 10.36
1st Quartile 0.80 3.28 10.40 19.44 18.64 10.48 9.18
Median 0.25 1.93 8.13 17.95 17.75 9.74 8.57
3rd Quartile -0.58 0.84 5.92 16.64 16.45 9.00 7.96
95th Percentile -2.06 -1.49 0.30 13.17 13.59 7.50 7.30
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 51
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 13.64 (46) 32.46 (61) 16.05 (44) 2.09 (49) N/A N/A N/A¢£
S&P 500 13.69 (44) 32.39 (62) 16.00 (46) 2.11 (49) 15.06 (45) 26.46 (50) -37.00 (63)�
5th Percentile 18.00 41.42 20.86 8.82 20.17 39.75 -24.11
1st Quartile 15.25 35.75 17.70 4.12 16.70 31.50 -33.04
Median 13.42 33.28 15.66 1.92 14.81 26.41 -35.96
3rd Quartile 11.36 30.81 13.60 -0.85 12.62 22.54 -38.14
95th Percentile 7.43 23.04 8.74 -6.40 9.01 15.75 -42.83
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 52
8.0
12.0
16.0
20.0
24.0
28.0 Return
5.0
8.0
11.0
14.0
17.0
20.0
Standard
Deviation
-4.0
-1.0
2.0
5.0
8.0
11.0
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
SSgA S&P 500 Flagship Fund 17.30 17.34 8.44 11.90 0.03 0.03¢
S&P 500 17.31 17.34 8.43 11.90 0.00 0.00Å
Median 17.95 17.75 8.82 12.41 2.52 2.74
Up Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
100.0 100.0
Down Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
100.2 100.0
Style History Jun-2015 Average Style Exposure
Ca
pit
ali
za
tio
n
Manager Style
Russell 1000 Growth Index
Russell 2000 Growth IndexRussell 2000 Value Index
Russell 1000 Value Index
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA S&P 500 Flagship FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 53
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund
Beginning Market Value 21,214,560 20,335,262 24,153,648 20,567,948 -
Net Cash Flows - - -4,000,000 -10,788,112 -13,405,397
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 76,139 955,437 1,137,051 11,510,862 34,696,095
Ending Market Value 21,290,699 21,290,699 21,290,699 21,290,699 21,290,699
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
0.1
0.2
-0.1
-0.2
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/10 12/10 3/11 6/11 9/11 12/11 3/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 0.36 4.70 6.48 17.85 17.14 N/A N/A
Russell 2000 Index 0.42 4.75 6.49 17.81 17.08 10.44 8.40
Difference -0.06 -0.05 -0.01 0.04 0.06 N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA Russell 2000 Index FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 54
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 0.36 (55) 4.70 (67) 6.48 (64) 17.85 (75) 17.14 (78) N/A N/A¢£
Russell 2000 Index 0.42 (53) 4.75 (67) 6.49 (64) 17.81 (75) 17.08 (78) 10.44 (75) 8.40 (80)�
5th Percentile 2.95 9.49 14.94 24.13 22.69 15.11 12.19
1st Quartile 1.38 7.38 10.90 21.57 20.47 13.07 10.65
Median 0.49 5.58 8.21 19.97 18.87 11.64 9.76
3rd Quartile -0.64 4.23 5.28 17.79 17.35 10.38 8.60
95th Percentile -1.83 0.87 -0.49 14.37 15.33 7.84 7.08
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Small Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 55
-100.0
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 5.00 (63) 38.87 (71) 16.36 (58) -4.10 (74) N/A N/A N/A¢£
Russell 2000 Index 4.89 (64) 38.82 (72) 16.35 (59) -4.18 (74) 26.85 (66) 27.17 (65) -33.79 (35)�
5th Percentile 11.02 56.42 23.99 5.64 38.66 57.36 -26.67
1st Quartile 8.45 45.69 19.67 1.90 31.69 39.91 -32.38
Median 6.55 41.31 17.11 -1.74 28.26 29.41 -35.92
3rd Quartile 3.43 38.36 14.34 -4.51 25.01 24.55 -39.81
95th Percentile -3.41 33.23 11.50 -11.14 21.83 16.14 -47.07
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Small Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 56
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0 Return
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
20.0
24.0
Standard
Deviation
-4.0
-1.0
2.0
5.0
8.0
11.0
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
SSgA Russell 2000 Index Fund 17.85 17.14 12.35 16.64 0.10 0.09¢
Russell 2000 Index 17.81 17.08 12.33 16.65 0.00 0.00Å
Median 19.97 18.87 11.95 16.58 3.70 3.91
Up Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
100.1 100.1
Down Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
100.1 99.9
Style History Jun-2015 Average Style Exposure
Ca
pit
ali
za
tio
n
Manager Style
Russell 1000 Growth Index
Russell 2000 Growth IndexRussell 2000 Value Index
Russell 1000 Value Index
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA Russell 2000 Index FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 57
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total International Equity
Beginning Market Value 72,917,852 69,741,881 77,839,073 34,926,688 23,118,011
Net Cash Flows - -78,359 921,641 26,121,641 32,841,845
Income - - - - 42,209
Gain/Loss 2,056,052 5,310,382 -3,786,809 13,925,575 18,971,838
Ending Market Value 74,973,904 74,973,904 74,973,904 74,973,904 74,973,904
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
-4.0
-8.0
-12.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/07 3/08 9/08 3/09 9/09 3/10 9/10 3/11 9/11 3/12 9/12 3/13 9/13 3/14 9/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total International Equity 2.82 7.62 -4.81 9.93 8.88 1.03 N/A
International Equity Index 0.67 4.70 -4.44 10.54 8.69 1.41 4.71
Difference 2.15 2.92 -0.37 -0.61 0.19 -0.38 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total International EquityAs of June 30, 2015
Page 58
-28.0
-22.0
-16.0
-10.0
-4.0
2.0
8.0
14.0
20.0
26.0
32.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total International Equity 2.82 (24) 7.62 (28) -4.81 (71) 9.93 (69) 8.88 (67) 1.03 (88) N/A¢£
International Equity Index 0.67 (67) 4.70 (61) -4.44 (69) 10.54 (66) 8.69 (69) 1.41 (85) 4.71 (95)�
5th Percentile 6.00 13.80 9.85 19.97 15.82 9.37 11.83
1st Quartile 2.69 8.05 0.71 15.00 12.17 5.82 9.11
Median 1.45 5.84 -2.15 12.26 10.22 3.61 7.34
3rd Quartile 0.24 2.99 -5.26 8.09 7.98 2.10 6.09
95th Percentile -2.33 -1.09 -11.28 2.71 3.10 -0.29 4.59
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 59
-100.0
-50.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
-150.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Total International Equity -8.97 (94) 18.52 (55) 23.07 (23) -14.69 (61) 10.75 (71) 41.21 (47) -50.31 (75)¢£
International Equity Index -4.00 (65) 17.93 (57) 17.32 (70) -12.14 (44) 7.75 (84) 31.78 (71) -43.38 (42)�
5th Percentile 8.35 36.30 29.33 -3.73 29.13 95.85 -20.89
1st Quartile 0.78 26.41 22.77 -10.12 21.11 65.97 -40.14
Median -2.76 20.09 19.77 -13.05 15.06 39.66 -44.86
3rd Quartile -5.10 5.19 16.70 -16.71 9.78 29.86 -50.32
95th Percentile -9.83 -4.13 8.10 -23.24 2.43 6.22 -57.79
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 60
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-1970
MSCI EAFE (Net) 100.00
Jan-2013
MSCI EAFE (Net) 86.90
MSCI EM (net) 13.10
Apr-2013
MSCI EAFE (Net) 82.80
MSCI EM (net) 17.20
Jul-2013
MSCI EAFE (Net) 80.30
MSCI EM (net) 19.70
Oct-2013
MSCI EAFE (Net) 76.30
MSCI EM (net) 23.70
Jan-2014
MSCI EAFE (Net) 74.50
MSCI EM (net) 25.50
Apr-2014
MSCI EAFE (Net) 73.50
MSCI EM (net) 26.50
Jul-2014
MSCI EAFE (Net) 67.11
MSCI EM (net) 32.89
Oct-2014
MSCI EAFE (Net) 67.15
MSCI EM (net) 32.85
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-2015
MSCI EAFE (Net) 67.07
MSCI EM (net) 32.93
Apr-2015
MSCI EAFE (Net) 68.32
MSCI EM (net) 31.68
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System International Equity Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 61
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Pictet
Beginning Market Value 49,814,661 46,773,491 53,749,242 34,926,688 23,118,011
Net Cash Flows - -78,359 -78,359 1,921,641 10,871,043
Income - - - - 42,209
Gain/Loss 1,652,947 4,772,476 -2,203,275 14,619,279 17,436,344
Ending Market Value 51,467,608 51,467,608 51,467,608 51,467,608 51,467,608
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
-4.0
-8.0
-12.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Pictet 3.32 10.21 -4.09 11.53 9.83 1.65 N/A
MSCI EAFE (Net) 0.62 5.52 -4.22 11.97 9.54 1.97 5.12
Difference 2.70 4.69 0.13 -0.44 0.29 -0.32 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System PictetAs of June 30, 2015
Page 62
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Pictet 3.32 (6) 10.21 (4) -4.09 (75) 11.53 (77) 9.83 (76) 1.65 (95) N/A¢£
MSCI EAFE (Net) 0.62 (77) 5.52 (73) -4.22 (77) 11.97 (67) 9.54 (80) 1.97 (91) 5.12 (98)�
5th Percentile 3.32 9.71 2.19 17.32 14.19 5.44 8.52
1st Quartile 2.07 7.30 -0.88 14.55 11.70 3.82 7.13
Median 1.65 6.37 -2.20 12.76 10.79 3.12 6.48
3rd Quartile 0.77 5.42 -4.12 11.63 9.87 2.49 6.03
95th Percentile -0.89 2.34 -8.19 9.31 8.04 1.60 5.20
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 63
-100.0
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Pictet -11.25 (100) 23.98 (41) 23.07 (4) -14.69 (77) 10.75 (56) 41.21 (18) N/A¢£
MSCI EAFE (Net) -4.90 (65) 22.78 (53) 17.32 (75) -12.14 (49) 7.75 (91) 31.78 (55) -43.38 (47)�
5th Percentile 3.76 30.42 22.92 -5.91 17.14 49.13 -33.80
1st Quartile -2.06 25.64 21.19 -10.22 13.47 38.87 -41.57
Median -3.70 23.16 19.46 -12.23 11.14 33.13 -43.69
3rd Quartile -5.43 19.35 17.27 -14.54 9.37 28.64 -45.85
95th Percentile -8.88 15.50 14.96 -17.42 6.33 20.98 -48.50
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Large Cap Core Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 64
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
20.0
24.0 Return
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
20.0
24.0
Standard
Deviation
-4.0
-1.0
2.0
5.0
8.0
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
Pictet 11.53 9.83 10.87 16.64 3.28 3.10¢
MSCI EAFE (Net) 11.97 9.54 10.38 15.60 0.00 0.00Å
Median 12.76 10.79 10.19 15.68 2.79 3.10
Up Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
95.8 102.2
Down Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
94.1 101.0
Style History Jun-2015 Average Style Exposure
Manager Style
MSCI World ex USA Growth
MSCI World ex US Small CapMSCI World ex US in LC
MSCI World ex U.S. Value
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System PictetAs of June 30, 2015
Page 65
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Wells
Beginning Market Value 23,103,191 22,968,390 24,089,830 - -
Net Cash Flows - - 1,000,000 - -
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 403,105 537,906 -1,583,534 - -
Ending Market Value 23,506,296 23,506,296 23,506,296 - -
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
2.0
4.0
-2.0
-4.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Wells 1.74 2.34 -6.22 N/A N/A N/A N/A
MSCI EM (net) 0.69 2.95 -5.12 3.71 3.69 0.86 8.11
Difference 1.05 -0.61 -1.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System WellsAs of June 30, 2015
Page 66
-28.0
-22.0
-16.0
-10.0
-4.0
2.0
8.0
14.0
20.0
26.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Wells 1.74 (32) 2.34 (48) -6.22 (65) N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
MSCI EM (net) 0.69 (58) 2.95 (37) -5.12 (53) 3.71 (71) 3.69 (74) 0.86 (71) 8.11 (73)�
5th Percentile 4.45 7.81 3.74 15.54 11.46 8.08 13.20
1st Quartile 2.03 3.82 -1.55 7.54 7.24 3.86 10.49
Median 1.03 2.22 -4.66 5.49 5.40 1.81 9.27
3rd Quartile 0.04 0.68 -8.00 3.56 3.58 0.72 7.98
95th Percentile -2.09 -2.57 -13.97 0.54 1.69 -2.04 6.87
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM Emerging Markets Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 67
-100.0
-50.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
-150.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Wells -3.84 (82) -0.39 (59) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
MSCI EM (net) -2.19 (71) -2.60 (74) 18.23 (69) -18.42 (50) 18.88 (69) 78.51 (58) -53.33 (44)�
5th Percentile 8.40 19.40 29.86 -8.16 33.87 116.49 -42.50
1st Quartile 2.83 4.29 22.93 -15.71 25.14 88.94 -50.71
Median -0.31 0.58 20.55 -18.42 21.65 80.12 -54.03
3rd Quartile -2.82 -2.75 17.22 -21.81 17.78 73.25 -56.58
95th Percentile -9.28 -7.95 12.34 -26.93 13.69 42.45 -61.60
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM Emerging Markets Equity (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 68
-12.0
-4.0
4.0
12.0
20.0
28.0 Return
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Standard
Deviation
-10.0
-4.0
2.0
8.0
14.0
20.0
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
Wells N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢
MSCI EM (net) 3.71 3.69 12.29 17.90 0.00 0.00Å
Median 5.49 5.40 12.03 17.72 4.35 4.45
No data found. No data found.
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System WellsAs of June 30, 2015
Total Fixed Income
Page 70
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total Domestic Fixed Income
Beginning Market Value 59,297,080 55,506,254 54,555,195 44,333,309 36,724,297
Net Cash Flows - 3,000,000 4,000,000 11,990,803 15,902,880
Income - 348,725 992,187 3,968,413 7,297,872
Gain/Loss -403,470 38,631 -653,772 -1,398,914 -1,031,439
Ending Market Value 58,893,610 58,893,610 58,893,610 58,893,610 58,893,610
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
-3.0
-6.0
-9.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
6/05 12/05 6/06 12/06 6/07 12/07 6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Domestic Fixed Income -0.68 0.75 1.15 2.02 3.60 5.14 4.08
Domestic Fixed Income Index -0.78 0.56 1.01 1.20 2.52 3.72 3.88
Difference 0.10 0.19 0.14 0.82 1.08 1.42 0.20
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total Domestic Fixed IncomeAs of June 30, 2015
Page 71
-16.0
-12.0
-8.0
-4.0
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Domestic Fixed Income -0.68 (53) 0.75 (45) 1.15 (67) 2.02 (68) 3.60 (63) 5.14 (54) 4.08 (76)¢£
Domestic Fixed Income Index -0.78 (57) 0.56 (54) 1.01 (73) 1.20 (88) 2.52 (83) 3.72 (79) 3.88 (78)�
5th Percentile 1.06 3.46 4.08 8.29 9.50 9.84 8.41
1st Quartile 0.12 1.12 2.23 4.43 6.75 7.21 6.04
Median -0.63 0.64 1.63 2.72 4.24 5.32 4.87
3rd Quartile -1.57 0.12 0.90 1.80 3.06 4.07 4.11
95th Percentile -7.33 -4.25 -1.46 0.57 1.26 1.89 2.64
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 72
-70.0
-55.0
-40.0
-25.0
-10.0
5.0
20.0
35.0
50.0
65.0
80.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Total Domestic Fixed Income 4.54 (50) -2.04 (81) 6.30 (55) 6.73 (46) 8.00 (46) 14.54 (36) -3.01 (66)¢£
Domestic Fixed Income Index 3.89 (56) -2.41 (86) 3.68 (80) 5.80 (60) 5.89 (73) 5.24 (82) 5.08 (25)�
5th Percentile 17.72 9.49 16.47 17.31 17.03 49.08 9.02
1st Quartile 6.63 1.65 10.84 8.21 11.12 20.30 4.96
Median 4.46 -0.26 6.84 6.42 7.59 10.53 1.28
3rd Quartile 2.23 -1.59 4.08 3.50 5.59 6.25 -7.43
95th Percentile 0.62 -7.73 1.43 0.28 2.07 1.35 -28.11
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 73
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-1973
Barclays Intermed. U.S. Government/Credit 100.00
May-2011
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 100.00
Jul-2012
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 93.30
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 6.70
Oct-2012
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 87.40
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 12.60
Jan-2013
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 82.20
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 17.80
Apr-2013
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 82.30
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 17.70
Jul-2013
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 83.10
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 16.90
Oct-2013
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 81.80
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 18.20
Jan-2014
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 81.40
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 18.60
Apr-2014
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 79.73
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 20.27
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jul-2014
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 76.49
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 23.51
Oct-2014
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 75.53
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 24.47
Jan-2015
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 75.62
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 24.38
Apr-2015
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 71.87
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 28.13
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Domestic Fixed Income Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 74
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Galliard
Beginning Market Value 42,619,690 41,985,168 41,743,044 41,342,920 36,724,297
Net Cash Flows - - - -2,000,000 -1,087,923
Income - 348,723 992,185 3,968,410 7,297,870
Gain/Loss -220,328 65,471 -335,866 -911,967 -534,882
Ending Market Value 42,399,362 42,399,362 42,399,362 42,399,362 42,399,362
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
3.0
6.0
-3.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/08 3/09 9/09 3/10 9/10 3/11 9/11 3/12 9/12 3/13 9/13 3/14 9/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Galliard -0.52 0.99 2.24 2.76 4.06 5.51 N/A
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate -0.67 0.64 1.89 1.74 2.89 4.16 4.22
Difference 0.15 0.35 0.35 1.02 1.17 1.35 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System GalliardAs of June 30, 2015
Page 75
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Galliard -0.52 (28) 0.99 (29) 2.24 (13) 2.76 (17) 4.06 (14) 5.51 (11) N/A¢£
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate -0.67 (62) 0.64 (83) 1.89 (34) 1.74 (73) 2.89 (75) 4.16 (76) 4.22 (81)�
5th Percentile 0.05 1.33 2.51 3.72 5.45 5.85 5.51
1st Quartile -0.50 1.02 2.01 2.54 3.60 4.91 4.79
Median -0.61 0.85 1.76 2.04 3.20 4.52 4.47
3rd Quartile -0.74 0.70 1.53 1.69 2.88 4.17 4.28
95th Percentile -1.05 0.34 1.11 1.26 2.42 3.61 3.87
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Intermediate Duration (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 76
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Galliard 4.98 (15) -0.55 (55) 6.36 (23) 6.73 (11) 8.00 (13) 14.54 (11) N/A¢£
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 4.12 (31) -1.02 (81) 3.56 (87) 5.97 (44) 6.15 (65) 6.46 (66) 4.86 (48)�
5th Percentile 6.84 1.84 8.97 7.27 9.76 18.28 8.58
1st Quartile 4.36 -0.05 6.18 6.37 7.12 11.10 6.65
Median 3.57 -0.51 4.99 5.86 6.45 7.90 4.50
3rd Quartile 3.13 -0.91 4.02 5.08 5.95 5.85 0.99
95th Percentile 1.83 -1.79 2.75 3.51 4.93 3.27 -7.63
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. Intermediate Duration (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 77
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0 Return
0.1
0.8
1.5
2.2
2.9
3.6
Standard
Deviation
-1.0
-0.1
0.8
1.7
2.6
3.5
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
Galliard 2.76 4.06 2.35 2.26 0.57 0.70¢
Barclays Intermediate Aggregate 1.74 2.89 2.10 2.07 0.00 0.00Å
Median 2.04 3.20 2.11 2.20 0.56 0.70
Up Market Capture
0.050.0
100.0150.0200.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
125.0 124.2
Down Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
5Years
Time Periods
98.1 96.6
Style History Jun-2015 Average Style Exposure
Manager Style
Barclays U.S. Government
Barclays U.S. Long Government/CreditBarclays 1-3yr Gov/Credit
Barclays US Credit Index
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System GalliardAs of June 30, 2015
Page 78
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
SSgA TIPS Index Fund
Beginning Market Value 16,677,390 13,521,086 12,812,152 2,990,390 -
Net Cash Flows - 3,000,000 4,000,000 13,990,803 -
Income - 3 3 3 -
Gain/Loss -183,142 -26,840 -317,906 -486,947 -
Ending Market Value 16,494,248 16,494,248 16,494,248 16,494,248 -
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
0.1
-0.1
-0.2
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA TIPS Index Fund -1.10 0.33 -1.77 -0.77 N/A N/A N/A
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -1.06 0.34 -1.73 -0.76 3.29 3.51 4.14
Difference -0.04 -0.01 -0.04 -0.01 N/A N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA TIPS Index FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 79
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA TIPS Index Fund -1.10 (67) 0.33 (70) -1.77 (43) -0.77 (88) N/A N/A N/A¢£
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -1.06 (49) 0.34 (64) -1.73 (38) -0.76 (83) 3.29 (51) 3.51 (60) 4.14 (61)�
5th Percentile 0.42 1.14 -1.18 0.31 3.85 4.06 4.58
1st Quartile -0.26 0.97 -1.60 -0.39 3.56 3.82 4.40
Median -1.07 0.42 -1.81 -0.52 3.30 3.60 4.21
3rd Quartile -1.13 0.29 -1.97 -0.72 2.49 2.99 4.00
95th Percentile -1.40 0.04 -2.66 -0.97 2.27 2.61 3.77
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. TIPS (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 80
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
SSgA TIPS Index Fund 3.63 (38) -8.62 (70) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS 3.64 (37) -8.61 (68) 6.98 (52) 13.56 (47) 6.31 (57) 11.41 (44) -2.35 (80)�
5th Percentile 4.38 -4.22 10.59 14.79 8.67 13.97 1.26
1st Quartile 3.72 -5.70 7.43 13.85 6.65 12.13 -0.52
Median 3.46 -8.41 7.02 13.50 6.38 11.19 -1.43
3rd Quartile 1.04 -8.68 6.38 9.88 5.48 10.75 -2.18
95th Percentile 0.01 -9.28 4.93 8.55 5.02 9.85 -3.46
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM U.S. TIPS (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 81
-4.0
-1.0
2.0
5.0
8.0 Return
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Standard
Deviation
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Tracking
Error
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
3Years
5Years
SSgA TIPS Index Fund -0.77 N/A 5.15 N/A 0.04 N/A¢
Barclays U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS -0.76 3.29 5.15 5.16 0.00 0.00Å
Median -0.52 3.30 4.98 5.12 0.80 0.63
Up Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
Time Periods
99.7
Down Market Capture
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
3Years
Time Periods
99.9
No data found.
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA TIPS Index FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 82
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total International Fixed Income
Beginning Market Value 42,971,647 40,116,655 41,120,369 19,496,076 -
Net Cash Flows - 3,000,000 4,000,000 21,800,035 21,408,158
Income - 3 3 3 3
Gain/Loss -597,044 -742,055 -2,745,769 1,078,489 20,966,442
Ending Market Value 42,374,603 42,374,603 42,374,603 42,374,603 42,374,603
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
-4.0
-8.0
-12.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/07 3/08 9/08 3/09 9/09 3/10 9/10 3/11 9/11 3/12 9/12 3/13 9/13 3/14 9/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total International Fixed Income -1.39 -1.70 -6.39 2.25 5.14 4.81 N/A
International Fixed Income Index -1.15 -3.87 -9.97 -2.32 1.30 1.64 3.12
Difference -0.24 2.17 3.58 4.57 3.84 3.17 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total International Fixed IncomeAs of June 30, 2015
Page 83
-30.0
-25.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total International Fixed Income -1.39 (79) -1.70 (61) -6.39 (55) 2.25 (50) 5.14 (51) 4.81 (59) N/A¢£
International Fixed Income Index -1.15 (71) -3.87 (71) -9.97 (66) -2.32 (77) 1.30 (82) 1.64 (89) 3.12 (92)�
5th Percentile 2.45 4.30 4.90 7.55 8.50 10.03 9.41
1st Quartile 0.85 2.12 -0.16 4.34 7.05 8.11 8.37
Median -0.38 -0.12 -4.29 2.07 5.24 5.76 7.36
3rd Quartile -1.27 -4.40 -12.57 -1.87 1.92 2.88 4.85
95th Percentile -3.00 -6.21 -16.02 -4.34 0.49 1.11 2.85
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 84
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Total International Fixed Income 2.69 (45) -1.83 (31) 13.91 (67) 5.11 (42) 7.43 (81) 10.27 (79) 2.41 (20)¢£
International Fixed Income Index -0.06 (63) -4.45 (49) 1.50 (98) 5.17 (41) 5.21 (90) 4.36 (95) 10.10 (6)�
5th Percentile 8.69 4.77 23.59 9.44 21.14 52.93 10.43
1st Quartile 5.07 -0.73 19.88 7.01 16.52 37.68 -0.43
Median 1.39 -4.77 17.37 4.37 14.05 27.17 -11.12
3rd Quartile -2.88 -7.40 11.19 -0.58 8.49 13.03 -16.99
95th Percentile -6.15 -10.23 2.95 -3.73 3.31 4.06 -30.98
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 85
Policy Index Weight (%)
Jan-1985
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 100.00
Aug-2013
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 85.00
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 15.00
Oct-2013
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 85.00
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 15.00
Jan-2014
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 73.60
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 26.40
Apr-2014
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 72.12
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 27.88
Jul-2014
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 73.55
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 26.45
Oct-2014
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 74.46
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 25.54
Jan-2015
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 74.46
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 25.54
Apr-2015
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond 68.29
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 31.71
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System International Fixed Income Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 86
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Brandywine
Beginning Market Value 29,347,765 29,870,192 30,229,370 19,496,076 15,371,082
Net Cash Flows - - 1,000,000 8,800,035 10,209,977
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss -757,609 -1,280,036 -2,639,214 294,045 3,009,097
Ending Market Value 28,590,156 28,590,156 28,590,156 28,590,156 28,590,156
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
-4.0
-8.0
-12.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/07 3/08 9/08 3/09 9/09 3/10 9/10 3/11 9/11 3/12 9/12 3/13 9/13 3/14 9/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Brandywine -2.58 -4.29 -8.47 1.40 4.61 4.44 N/A
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -1.54 -5.83 -13.49 -3.88 0.32 0.94 2.63
Difference -1.04 1.54 5.02 5.28 4.29 3.50 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System BrandywineAs of June 30, 2015
Page 87
-30.0
-25.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Brandywine -2.58 (94) -4.29 (75) -8.47 (62) 1.40 (56) 4.61 (53) 4.44 (61) N/A¢£
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -1.54 (81) -5.83 (92) -13.49 (81) -3.88 (91) 0.32 (97) 0.94 (97) 2.63 (97)�
5th Percentile 2.45 4.30 4.90 7.55 8.50 10.03 9.41
1st Quartile 0.85 2.12 -0.16 4.34 7.05 8.11 8.37
Median -0.38 -0.12 -4.29 2.07 5.24 5.76 7.36
3rd Quartile -1.27 -4.40 -12.57 -1.87 1.92 2.88 4.85
95th Percentile -3.00 -6.21 -16.02 -4.34 0.49 1.11 2.85
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 88
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Brandywine 2.63 (45) -1.63 (30) 13.91 (67) 5.11 (42) 7.43 (81) 10.27 (79) 2.41 (20)¢£
Citigroup Non-U.S. World Government Bond -2.68 (74) -4.56 (49) 1.50 (98) 5.17 (41) 5.21 (90) 4.36 (95) 10.10 (6)�
5th Percentile 8.69 4.77 23.59 9.44 21.14 52.93 10.43
1st Quartile 5.07 -0.73 19.88 7.01 16.52 37.68 -0.43
Median 1.39 -4.77 17.37 4.37 14.05 27.17 -11.12
3rd Quartile -2.88 -7.40 11.19 -0.58 8.49 13.03 -16.99
95th Percentile -6.15 -10.23 2.95 -3.73 3.31 4.06 -30.98
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM International Fixed Income (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 89
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt
Beginning Market Value 13,623,882 10,246,463 10,890,999 - -
Net Cash Flows - 3,000,000 3,000,000 - -
Income - 3 3 - -
Gain/Loss 160,565 537,981 -106,555 - -
Ending Market Value 13,784,447 13,784,447 13,784,447 - -
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
2.0
4.0
-2.0
-4.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 1.18 4.06 -2.10 N/A N/A N/A N/A
JPM EMBI Global Diversified -0.34 1.67 0.51 4.30 6.76 7.67 7.45
Difference 1.52 2.39 -2.61 N/A N/A N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Pyramis Emerging Market DebtAs of June 30, 2015
Page 90
-30.0
-25.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 1.18 (22) 4.06 (6) -2.10 (32) N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
JPM EMBI Global Diversified -0.34 (59) 1.67 (37) 0.51 (15) 4.30 (28) 6.76 (41) 7.67 (44) 7.45 (79)�
5th Percentile 2.65 4.28 2.43 6.79 8.49 10.06 9.41
1st Quartile 1.00 2.40 -1.16 4.39 7.17 8.53 8.70
Median -0.15 0.90 -4.24 2.75 6.41 7.26 8.15
3rd Quartile -0.78 -3.70 -12.69 -2.19 2.07 3.62 7.66
95th Percentile -1.89 -5.74 -16.15 -4.04 0.81 1.77 5.67
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM Emerging Markets Debt (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 91
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Pyramis Emerging Market Debt 2.69 (44) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
JPM EMBI Global Diversified 7.43 (7) -5.25 (43) 17.44 (72) 7.34 (21) 12.24 (89) 29.83 (67) -12.01 (35)�
5th Percentile 7.58 1.80 23.96 8.59 21.12 59.03 -4.44
1st Quartile 5.09 -2.86 20.65 7.01 17.39 39.73 -9.99
Median 1.26 -5.97 18.97 2.95 15.17 32.54 -14.94
3rd Quartile -3.56 -8.10 17.05 -1.79 13.93 27.08 -19.98
95th Percentile -6.57 -10.18 13.13 -3.62 8.61 20.15 -31.85
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM Emerging Markets Debt (SA+CF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on quarterly periodicity.
Page 92
Total Real Estate
Page 93
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total Real Estate
Beginning Market Value 12,277,159 12,031,841 11,486,313 10,067,265 7,107,434
Net Cash Flows -168,258 -168,258 -435,716 -1,495,133 -1,041,037
Income - - - 265,883 523,347
Gain/Loss 399,391 644,709 1,457,696 3,670,277 5,918,547
Ending Market Value 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
-3.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
12/07 6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Real Estate 3.25 5.36 12.86 12.41 14.49 2.59 N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.92 7.45 14.52 12.88 14.27 3.18 6.57
Difference -0.67 -2.09 -1.66 -0.47 0.22 -0.59 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total Real EstateAs of June 30, 2015
Page 94
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
PRISA
Beginning Market Value 12,277,159 12,031,841 11,486,313 10,067,265 7,107,434
Net Cash Flows -168,258 -168,258 -435,716 -1,495,133 -1,041,037
Income - - - 265,883 523,347
Gain/Loss 399,391 644,709 1,457,696 3,670,277 5,918,547
Ending Market Value 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292 12,508,292
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
-3.0
-6.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
12/07 6/08 12/08 6/09 12/09 6/10 12/10 6/11 12/11 6/12 12/12 6/13 12/13 6/14 12/14 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
PRISA 3.25 5.36 12.86 12.41 14.49 2.59 N/A
NCREIF Fund Index-Open End Diversified Core (EW) 3.92 7.45 14.52 12.88 14.27 3.18 6.57
Difference -0.67 -2.09 -1.66 -0.47 0.22 -0.59 N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System PRISAAs of June 30, 2015
Page 95
Total Alternatives
Page 96
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
Total Alternatives
Beginning Market Value 42,869,146 43,047,941 44,738,283 10,395,386 -
Net Cash Flows - - 1,962,684 34,430,411 -
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 453,309 274,515 -3,378,511 -1,503,342 -
Ending Market Value 43,322,455 43,322,455 43,322,455 43,322,455 -
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
-0.5
-1.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/11 12/11 3/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Total Alternatives 1.06 0.64 -7.79 -1.46 N/A N/A N/A
Alternatives Index 1.61 1.08 -7.29 -2.10 0.25 -8.18 -0.54
Difference -0.55 -0.44 -0.50 0.64 N/A N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Total AlternativesAs of June 30, 2015
Page 97
Policy Index Weight (%)
Feb-1991
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 100.00
Apr-2013
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 75.60
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 24.40
Jul-2013
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 73.50
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 26.50
Oct-2013
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 48.40
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 51.60
Jan-2014
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 35.30
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 64.70
Apr-2014
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 35.18
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 64.82
Jul-2014
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 38.28
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 61.72
Oct-2014
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 33.59
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 66.41
Jan-2015
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 30.83
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 69.17
Apr-2015
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 29.07
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 70.93
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Alternatives Index
As of June 30, 2015
Page 98
Rolling Return and Tracking Error
Performance
Gain / Loss
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund
Beginning Market Value 12,469,719 13,270,603 17,138,374 10,395,386 -
Net Cash Flows - - - 6,954,912 -
Income - - - - -
Gain/Loss 573,761 -227,123 -4,094,895 -4,306,819 -
Ending Market Value 13,043,480 13,043,480 13,043,480 13,043,480 -
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Rolling Tracking Error Active Return
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
-0.4
-0.8
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
9/11 12/11 3/12 6/12 9/12 12/12 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund 4.60 -1.71 -23.89 -8.89 N/A N/A N/A
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.66 -1.56 -23.71 -8.76 -3.91 -10.91 -2.62
Difference -0.06 -0.15 -0.18 -0.13 N/A N/A N/A
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System SSgA Bloomberg Commodity FundAs of June 30, 2015
Page 99
-70.0
-55.0
-40.0
-25.0
-10.0
5.0
20.0
35.0
50.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund 4.60 (31) -1.71 (33) -23.89 (46) -8.89 (39) N/A N/A N/A¢£
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return 4.66 (31) -1.56 (32) -23.71 (44) -8.76 (38) -3.91 (47) -10.91 (59) -2.62 (56)�
5th Percentile 10.52 1.74 19.16 8.60 2.23 1.84 8.42
1st Quartile 5.41 -1.12 -15.13 -6.97 -1.54 -6.65 -1.15
Median 2.99 -2.55 -24.31 -9.80 -4.24 -9.81 -2.02
3rd Quartile -1.19 -5.27 -30.38 -11.14 -6.04 -15.81 -8.24
95th Percentile -9.28 -15.09 -45.04 -20.78 -15.86 -21.82 -8.92
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM All Commodities (MF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 100
-100.0
-50.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
-150.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
SSgA Bloomberg Commodity Fund -17.15 (55) -9.57 (50) 0.15 (43) N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return -17.01 (54) -9.52 (50) -1.06 (50) -13.32 (72) 16.83 (41) 18.91 (55) -35.65 (24)�
5th Percentile 22.88 14.50 10.35 11.21 65.91 91.85 -2.65
1st Quartile -7.32 -1.93 4.39 -2.29 24.04 39.07 -36.01
Median -16.67 -9.67 -1.14 -8.27 15.51 21.53 -44.23
3rd Quartile -21.38 -14.92 -7.72 -13.86 5.67 8.82 -49.11
95th Percentile -41.29 -31.24 -26.58 -30.25 -34.24 -50.93 -54.93
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System IM All Commodities (MF)
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 101
Comparative Performance & Rolling Return
Historical Statistics — Since Inception
Correlation Analysis — 5 Years
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Active Return
0.0
2.0
4.0
-2.0
-4.0
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 2014 2013 2012
EnTrust -1.39 0.56 -1.50 N/A N/A 1.69 N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 3.14 7.70 4.22
Difference -1.71 -1.68 -4.26 N/A N/A -1.45 N/A N/A
ReturnStandardDeviation
SharpeRatio Beta
InceptionDate
EnTrust 4.64 3.53 1.29 1.56 02/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 4.70 1.93 2.37 1.00 02/01/2013
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill 0.04 0.02 N/A 0.00 02/01/2013
EnTrust HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
EnTrust N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index N/A 1.00
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill N/A -0.04 1.00
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System EnTrustAs of June 30, 2015
Page 102
Risk & Return — 3 Years Risk & Return — 5 Years
Distribution of Returns
0
5
10
15
20
Fre
qu
en
cy
< -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5
Returns (%)
0 0 0 0
2
12
5
8
2
0 0 0
-3.0
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
Re
turn
(%)
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Re
turn
(%)
-1.2 -0.6 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System EnTrustAs of June 30, 2015
Page 103
-44.0
-36.0
-28.0
-20.0
-12.0
-4.0
4.0
12.0
20.0
28.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
EnTrust -1.39 (90) 0.56 (39) -1.50 (34) N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 (75) 2.24 (30) 2.76 (22) 5.53 (28) 3.67 (35) 0.93 (35) 2.62 (71)�
5th Percentile 6.64 9.60 9.47 11.77 8.42 5.57 10.25
1st Quartile 5.15 2.88 1.75 5.84 4.81 1.76 6.82
Median 2.98 -2.77 -11.58 1.41 1.76 0.11 4.17
3rd Quartile 0.32 -7.36 -18.60 -4.31 -0.82 -2.53 2.33
95th Percentile -3.51 -11.24 -23.91 -7.69 -3.76 -6.35 -0.08
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Fund of Funds Hedge Funds
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 104
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
EnTrust 1.69 (26) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 3.14 (19) 7.70 (52) 4.22 (57) -3.55 (32) 5.07 (50) 9.65 (74) -19.86 (52)�
5th Percentile 10.56 22.17 14.89 2.26 19.91 58.06 5.90
1st Quartile 1.84 13.28 8.21 -2.42 12.00 24.73 -13.92
Median -3.99 8.22 5.12 -5.81 5.02 15.18 -19.62
3rd Quartile -10.15 1.21 1.57 -9.62 -0.84 9.29 -26.61
95th Percentile -17.58 -12.02 -6.03 -26.39 -6.07 -0.51 -42.13
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Fund of Funds Hedge Funds
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 105
Fund Description:EnTrust Diversified Fund seeks to achieve consistent, risk-adjusted returns in changing market environments with a diversified portfolio of managers trading a range of strategies, including long/short equities, distressedsecurities, special situations, event-driven, multi-arbitrage and activism-both U.S. and non-U.S. The majority of the investment team's resources and time is devoted to extensive bottom-up research of managers andtheir organizations.
Quarterly Commentary:
Entrust Capital Diversified Fund returned -1.32% during the second quarter and underperformed its benchmark (HFRI FOF: Conservative Index) return of -0.09% for the same period. While performance in April was positive, negative returns in May (-0.23%), and especially in June (-1.49%), hampered returns. The fund’s Opportunistic strategy (-119 basis points) was the main detractor during the quarter followed by Global Long/Short Equity (-20 basis points), Activist (-20 basis points), and theEnTrust Portfolio Tail Risk Fund (-8 basis points). Meanwhile, the Fund’s Credit & Special Situations and Event Driven, Multi-Strategy, & Arbitrage strategies produced modest gains of 19 basis points and 15 basis points, respectively. The top fiveperformance detractors included: Gramercy Special Opportunity Fund (Opportunistic), SAB Capital Partners (Global Long/Short Equity), York Multi-Strategy (Event Driven, Multi-Strategy, & Arbitrage), Cevian Capital II (Activist), and the EnTrust Portfolio& Tail Risk Fund (Tail Risk). The Gramercy Special Opportunity Fund detracted -1.18% from second quarter performance as its core position in Peruvian Agrarian bonds declined as a result of developments pertaining to a legal filing submitted to thePeruvian Tribunal by the Land Reform Bondholders Association. SAB Capital Partners -0.29% drag on performance was largely the result of long position losses in OnDeck Capital and Altisource Residential. The top five contributing managers for thequarter included: Saba E Fund (Event Driven, Multi-Strategy, & Arbitrage), Paulson ESP Segregated Portfolio Company 1 (Event Driven, Multi-Strategy, & Arbitrage) Carl Marks Strategic Opportunity Fund (Credit & Special Situations), Third PointOffshore Fund (Event Driven, Multi-Strategy, & Arbitrage), and Tosca Fund (Global Long/Short Equity). The Saba E Fund contributed 0.12% to performance led higher by long positioning in the bonds of newspaper publisher The McClatchy Company
versus short credit positioning implemented through the company’s CDS. Elsewhere, Paulson ESP Segregated Portfolio Company contributed 0.10% during the period as a result of strength in its event-driven equity investments.
Performance Analysis (Net of All Fees)
Statistical Analysis - Since Inception
Correlation Analysis - 5 Years
Strategy Allocation Overviewas of 03/31/15
Strategy Allocation Overviewas of 06/30/15
Risk/RewardAnalysis - Since Inception
1Quarter
1Year
3Years
5Years
7Years
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. -1.32 -1.38 6.41 5.34 4.28
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.76 5.53 3.67 0.93
Barclays Aggregate -1.68 1.86 1.83 3.35 4.59
S&P 500 0.28 7.42 17.31 17.34 9.42
ReturnStandardDeviation
SharpeRatio Beta
InceptionDate
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. 6.06 6.64 0.71 1.44 10/01/2003
Barclays Aggregate 4.39 3.30 0.89 -0.05 10/01/2003
S&P 500 8.60 13.93 0.56 2.16 10/01/2003
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 3.00 4.15 0.40 1.00 10/01/2003
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill 1.40 0.54 N/A 0.00 10/01/2003
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. HFRI FOF: Conservative Index S&P 500 Barclays Aggregate
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. 1.00
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.88 1.00
S&P 500 0.79 0.74 1.00
Barclays Aggregate -0.19 -0.18 -0.21 1.00
0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0%
Activist
Credit and Special Situations
Event Driven, Multi-Strat and Arb
Global Long/Short Equity
Opportunistic
21.5%
13.6%
36.8%
12.5%
15.7%
0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0%
Activist
Credit and Special Situations
Event Driven, Multi-Strat and Arb
Global Long/Short Equity
Opportunistic
Portfolio Tail Risk
18.5%
22.6%
31.6%
9.8%
14.4%
3.1%
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
Ret
urn
(%)
-2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Barclays Aggregate
S&P 500
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd.
Hedge Fund Monitoring Report
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. as of 06/30/15Category:Strategy:
Fund of FundsNon-Directional
Note: Current quarter return is an estimate and is subject to revision.
Peer Group Analysis vs. Fund of Funds Hedge Funds as of 06/30/15
Distribution of Returns - Since Inception
Rolling Returns - Since Inception
Historical Performance Monthly
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0R
etu
rn
1 Qtr 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs YTD 2014 2013
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. -1.32 (89) -1.38 (33) 6.41 (22) 5.34 (22) 0.61 (38) 1.82 (26) 10.99 (36)¢£
5th Percentile 6.64 9.47 11.77 8.42 9.46 10.56 22.17
1st Quartile 5.15 1.75 5.84 4.81 2.87 1.84 13.28
Median 2.98 -11.58 1.41 1.76 -2.79 -3.99 8.22
3rd Quartile 0.32 -18.60 -4.31 -0.82 -7.38 -10.15 1.21
95th Percentile -3.51 -23.91 -7.69 -3.76 -11.25 -17.58 -12.02
Population 750 738 684 627 748 1,768 2,012
0
15
30
45
60
Fre
qu
ency
< -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5
Returns (%)
2 1 4 1
13
28 3040
15
4 2 1
Rolling 3 Years Active Return Quarterly Active Return
0.0
6.0
12.0
18.0
-6.0
-12.0Act
ive
Ret
urn
(%)
12/03 9/04 6/05 3/06 12/06 9/07 6/08 3/09 12/09 9/10 6/11 3/12 12/12 9/13 6/14 6/15
January February March April May June July August September October November December Year
2003 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.74 1.15 2.02 N/A
2004 2.23 1.48 0.63 0.13 -0.26 1.27 -0.86 0.46 1.39 0.40 2.90 2.15 12.52
2005 -0.09 1.29 -0.68 -1.75 0.26 1.37 1.74 0.69 0.60 -1.55 1.22 1.40 4.51
2006 2.40 0.75 1.96 1.32 -1.35 -0.38 0.12 1.26 0.72 1.96 1.68 1.76 12.83
2007 1.97 1.28 0.75 1.78 2.40 0.25 0.28 -1.79 0.88 2.57 -0.83 0.06 9.93
2008 -2.31 0.89 -1.97 -0.19 1.96 -1.11 -3.46 -0.41 -6.54 -9.79 -3.50 -1.84 -25.34
2009 1.82 -1.12 -0.02 1.49 5.50 2.47 3.94 4.35 4.60 2.09 2.45 3.17 35.20
2010 -0.15 0.13 3.59 0.68 -3.32 -1.22 2.28 0.67 2.58 1.87 0.28 3.37 11.07
2011 0.37 1.34 0.31 0.74 -0.13 -1.67 -0.52 -4.05 -3.49 1.98 -0.82 1.36 -4.67
2012 1.98 1.06 0.22 -0.10 -1.63 -0.26 0.44 1.08 0.77 -0.06 2.33 1.28 7.28
2013 1.65 -0.01 1.20 0.02 1.61 -0.73 1.41 -0.28 1.52 1.57 1.47 1.08 10.99
2014 -0.16 2.25 -0.18 -0.04 1.06 0.90 -0.62 0.43 -0.50 -1.74 1.26 -0.79 1.82
2015 -0.56 2.55 -0.02 0.40 -0.23 -1.49 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hedge Fund Monitoring Report
EnTrust Diversified Fund, Ltd. as of 06/30/15Category:Strategy:
Fund of FundsNon-Directional
Note: Current quarter return is an estimate and is subject to revision.
Comparative Performance & Rolling Return
Historical Statistics — Since Inception
Correlation Analysis — 5 Years
Rolling 3 Yrs Active Return Active Return
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.8
-0.6
Ac
tive
Re
turn
(%)
12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 2014 2013 2012
Blackstone Partners NT 0.59 2.80 4.94 N/A N/A 5.77 N/A N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 2.24 2.76 5.53 3.67 3.14 7.70 4.22
Difference 0.27 0.56 2.18 N/A N/A 2.63 N/A N/A
ReturnStandardDeviation
SharpeRatio Beta
InceptionDate
Blackstone Partners NT 6.46 2.13 2.94 1.01 08/01/2013
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 4.59 1.97 2.27 1.00 08/01/2013
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill 0.04 0.01 N/A 0.00 08/01/2013
Blackstone Partners NT HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
Blackstone Partners NT N/A
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index N/A 1.00
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill N/A -0.04 1.00
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Blackstone Partners NTAs of June 30, 2015
Page 108
Risk & Return — 3 Years Risk & Return — 5 Years
Distribution of Returns
0
5
10
15
20
Fre
qu
en
cy
< -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5
Returns (%)
0 0 0 0 0
6
12
5
0 0 0 0
-3.0
0.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
Re
turn
(%)
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Re
turn
(%)
-1.2 -0.6 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.2
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Blackstone Partners NTAs of June 30, 2015
Page 109
-44.0
-36.0
-28.0
-20.0
-12.0
-4.0
4.0
12.0
20.0
28.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs 10 Yrs
Blackstone Partners NT 0.59 (72) 2.80 (27) 4.94 (15) N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 0.32 (75) 2.24 (30) 2.76 (22) 5.53 (28) 3.67 (35) 0.93 (35) 2.62 (71)�
5th Percentile 6.64 9.60 9.47 11.77 8.42 5.57 10.25
1st Quartile 5.15 2.88 1.75 5.84 4.81 1.76 6.82
Median 2.98 -2.77 -11.58 1.41 1.76 0.11 4.17
3rd Quartile 0.32 -7.36 -18.60 -4.31 -0.82 -2.53 2.33
95th Percentile -3.51 -11.24 -23.91 -7.69 -3.76 -6.35 -0.08
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Fund of Funds Hedge Funds
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 110
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Re
turn
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Blackstone Partners NT 5.77 (9) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A¢£
HFRI FOF: Conservative Index 3.14 (19) 7.70 (52) 4.22 (57) -3.55 (32) 5.07 (50) 9.65 (74) -19.86 (52)�
5th Percentile 10.56 22.17 14.89 2.26 19.91 58.06 5.90
1st Quartile 1.84 13.28 8.21 -2.42 12.00 24.73 -13.92
Median -3.99 8.22 5.12 -5.81 5.02 15.18 -19.62
3rd Quartile -10.15 1.21 1.57 -9.62 -0.84 9.29 -26.61
95th Percentile -17.58 -12.02 -6.03 -26.39 -6.07 -0.51 -42.13
City of Springfield Police & Fire Retirement System Fund of Funds Hedge Funds
As of June 30, 2015
Parentheses contain percentile rankings.Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
Page 111
Fund Description:Partners NT targets attractive risk-adjusted returns through investments in a well-diversified group of managers that employ a variety of unique investment strategies including Interest Rate-Driven, Credit-Driven,Commodities, Event-Driven, Equity, Managed Futures, and Global Macro. Partners NT targets low volatility and low correlation to traditional asset classes.
Quarterly Commentary:
Blackstone Partners NT Fund returned 0.57% during the second quarter underperforming its benchmark (90 Day T-Bills +4%) return of 1.0% for the same period. Negative returns during both April and June detracted frompositive returns generated during May. For the quarter, gains were widespread, with the majority of underlying strategy groups posting profits during the period. Arbitrage & Event managers were the strongest performersfollowed by Equity Long/Short and Special Situations managers. Meanwhile, Directional Trading & Fixed Income managers detracted from returns. Within Arbitrage & Event, the multi-strategy sub-strategy contributed the bulkof returns. Elliott International (+0.16% contribution) and D.E. Shaw Composite Graphite International (+0.14% contribution), both multi-strategy managers, were two of the funds top five second quarter performers. ParntersNT has maintained its Event positioning as corporate activity levels are still sustaining opportunities. Also, the team has maintained its allocation to Arbitrage & Event sub-strategy allocation to mortgage and structuredcredit/ABS managers, as they see opportunities in MSRs/whole loans/ CLOS and believe that ABS valuations have rebounded with bank supply sustaining the ABS opportunity. Regarding Equity Long/Short, equities trading andEM equity sub-strategies produced the majority of gains. SRS Partners, an equities fundamental allocation, was a top five contributor to overall fund performance during the period, adding 0.09% in gains. Partners NT continuesto maintain overweight Equity Long/Short strategy exposure, especially to low net managers, as the team believes in the potential for alpha generation on both long and short positions. Additionally, Partners NT has maintainedits allocation to quantitative equity managers as the team believes it provides continued alpha potential with shorter-term risk-diversifying benefits. Elsewhere, the Directional Trading & Fixed Income strategy slightly detractedfrom performance during the quarter with CTA managers leading negative performing sub-strategy groups. Specifically, CTA manager Two Sigma Absolute Return Macro Enhanced strategy (-0.12% contribution) was a bottomfive manager in terms of contribution to overall fund performance. Macro Thematic manager Tudor BVI Global (-0.03%), was also a bottom five manager. Partners NT will continue to overweight/add to its global macroallocation, especially diversified relative value trading on broader macro themes and will reduce its CTA exposure as choppy markets will mean fewer trends to be taken advantage of. Finally, Partners NT is underweight and/or
reducing exposure to the following sub-strategies (in addition to those already mentioned): reinsurance, activism, and credit fundamental.
Performance Analysis (Net of All Fees)
Statistical Analysis - Since Inception
Correlation Analysis - 3 Years
Strategy Allocation Overviewas of 03/31/15
Strategy Allocation Overviewas of 06/30/15
Risk/RewardAnalysis - Since Inception
1Quarter
1Year
3Years
5Years
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. 0.57 4.87 7.52 5.85
90 Day T-Bills +4% 0.99 4.03 4.06 4.07
Barclays Aggregate -1.68 1.86 1.83 3.35
S&P 500 0.28 7.42 17.31 17.34
ReturnStandardDeviation
SharpeRatio Beta
InceptionDate
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. 7.47 4.43 1.11 1.04 07/01/1996
Barclays Aggregate 5.66 3.48 0.90 0.69 07/01/1996
S&P 500 8.08 15.46 0.42 -0.65 07/01/1996
90 Day T-Bills +4% 6.60 0.66 1,829.89 1.00 07/01/1996
90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill 2.50 0.66 N/A 1.00 07/01/1996
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. Barclays Aggregate S&P 500 90 Day T-Bills +4%
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. 1.00
Barclays Aggregate 0.03 1.00
S&P 500 0.58 -0.03 1.00
90 Day T-Bills +4% -0.08 0.12 -0.23 1.00
0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0%
Arbitrage & Event
Cash & Other
Directional Trading & Fixed Income
Equity Long/Short
Special Situations
41.1%
2.3%
9.2%
39.0%
8.4%
0.0% 15.0% 30.0% 45.0% 60.0%
Arbitrage & Event
Cash & Other
Directional Trading & Fixed Income
Equity Long/Short
Special Situations
42.5%
2.3%
12.9%
35.0%
7.3%
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Ret
urn
(%)
-6.0 -3.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Barclays Aggregate
S&P 500
90 Day T-Bills +4%
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P.
Hedge Fund Monitoring Report
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. as of 06/30/15Category:Strategy:
Fund of FundsNon-Directional
Note: Current quarter return is an estimate and is subject to revision.
Peer Group Analysis vs. Fund of Funds Hedge Funds as of 06/30/15
Distribution of Returns - Since Inception
Rolling Returns - Since Inception
Historical Performance Monthly
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
Re
turn
1 Qtr 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs YTD 2014 2013
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. 0.57 (72) 4.87 (15) 7.52 (17) 5.85 (19) 2.80 (26) 5.69 (9) 8.91 (47)¢£
5th Percentile 6.64 9.47 11.77 8.42 9.46 10.56 22.17
1st Quartile 5.15 1.75 5.84 4.81 2.87 1.84 13.28
Median 2.98 -11.58 1.41 1.76 -2.79 -3.99 8.22
3rd Quartile 0.32 -18.60 -4.31 -0.82 -7.38 -10.15 1.21
95th Percentile -3.51 -23.91 -7.69 -3.76 -11.25 -17.58 -12.02
Population 750 738 684 627 748 1,768 2,012
0
50
100
150
Fre
qu
ency
< -5 -5 To -4 -4 To -3 -3 To -2 -2 To -1 -1 To 0 0 To 1 1 To 2 2 To 3 3 To 4 4 To 5 > 5
Returns (%)
2 1 1 215
26
9570
11 4 1 0
Rolling 3 Years Active Return Quarterly Active Return
0.0
8.0
16.0
-8.0
-16.0
-24.0Act
ive
Ret
urn
(%)
9/96 9/97 9/98 9/99 9/00 9/01 9/02 9/03 9/04 9/05 9/06 9/07 9/08 9/09 9/10 9/11 9/12 9/13 9/14 6/15
January February March April May June July August September October November December Year
1996 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -0.27 1.63 0.58 1.76 2.30 0.47 N/A
1997 2.70 1.25 -0.09 0.13 1.92 1.88 2.91 0.28 2.95 0.19 1.17 3.05 19.87
1998 0.34 1.93 4.33 0.66 0.33 -0.31 0.14 -4.27 -1.49 -0.51 2.66 1.95 5.64
1999 1.39 0.40 1.83 2.23 0.78 1.35 0.38 0.69 0.79 0.52 2.98 3.58 18.23
2000 1.49 3.68 0.19 0.14 0.28 1.97 0.94 1.73 1.00 0.22 0.40 1.47 14.31
2001 1.78 1.27 0.30 0.11 1.16 0.31 0.66 1.19 -1.11 0.93 0.56 1.16 8.61
2002 1.03 0.43 0.44 0.72 0.28 -1.79 -1.90 0.79 -0.30 0.28 1.27 0.69 1.90
2003 1.00 0.42 0.04 1.37 1.31 0.95 -0.19 0.40 0.64 1.06 0.52 1.38 9.26
2004 1.32 0.52 0.25 0.31 -0.33 0.14 -0.54 0.06 0.55 0.77 1.56 1.22 5.96
2005 0.37 0.94 -0.02 -0.84 0.18 1.08 1.34 0.62 1.42 -1.06 1.42 1.35 6.97
2006 2.47 0.73 1.44 2.02 -1.54 0.10 -0.04 0.47 0.89 1.23 1.90 1.66 11.86
2007 1.63 0.94 1.41 1.68 1.89 0.91 1.45 -1.80 1.52 2.10 -0.55 0.76 12.54
2008 -1.51 0.66 -2.73 0.65 1.37 -0.52 -1.90 -1.12 -5.82 -5.47 -3.02 -1.76 -19.47
2009 1.14 -0.14 0.22 1.42 3.45 0.71 1.50 1.51 1.85 0.61 1.20 0.65 15.02
2010 0.79 0.51 1.43 0.73 -1.61 -0.36 0.89 0.48 1.50 1.41 0.09 1.72 7.80
2011 0.71 0.94 0.08 1.19 -0.58 -1.01 0.16 -1.54 -2.28 1.40 -0.28 -0.23 -1.50
2012 1.74 1.21 0.32 0.06 -1.02 -0.15 1.05 1.09 1.06 0.00 0.83 0.90 7.29
2013 2.00 0.64 0.90 0.45 1.08 -0.81 0.80 -0.07 0.90 1.01 0.95 0.74 8.91
2014 0.71 1.32 -0.22 0.07 1.25 0.44 0.29 0.59 0.50 -0.91 0.92 0.61 5.69
2015 -0.17 1.41 0.97 -0.08 1.30 -0.64 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hedge Fund Monitoring Report
Blackstone Partners Non-Taxable L.P. as of 06/30/15Category:Strategy:
Fund of FundsNon-Directional
Note: Current quarter return is an estimate and is subject to revision.