Post on 21-Jan-2021
transcript
1
ANC 100 YEARS CONFERENCE - DEBATING LIBERATION HISTORIES
AND DEMOCRACY TODAY
September 2011
REVISITING THE HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE
NATIONAL QUESTION IN SOUTH AFRICA
By Judy Mulqueeny
“Blank pages in history should not be allowed”, Mzala 1989
In 2012 the ANC will celebrate its centenary. It situates this in the organisational framework
resolved at the Polokwane Conference in 2007. The philosophical underpinning of the planned
event is unity in diversity and the struggle against imperialism. Since democracy in 1994 this
theme has been the cornerstone of the ANC's nation building project it says.
Historically, struggles in the villages and other local areas formed a vital part of the the national
liberation struggle led by the ANC. The centenial celebration seeks to bind the nation as well as
to cement communities. It aims to engage the people, to open their energies and to keep them
involved. Also, the centenary will be celebrated as a South African, African and world historic
event.
I
A Brief History of Imperialism With the birth of capitalism, nations and national movements emerged, with each rooted in a
single economy. Moreover, modernity as modern civilisation, as well as capitalism stirred in
large areas of the world beyond Europe. But for various reasons the potentially different paths to
modernity aborted. Modernity became inseparable from the imperialist expansion of European
capitalism.
Both liberal and socialist theorists in Europe were long preoccupied with the national question,
debating issues of national unity and independence. After the first Communist International,
Marx and Engels labeled revolutions of the people - the workers, peasants, professionals,
intellectuals and small shopkeepers - 'bourgeois democratic'. Now the revolutionary process need
not wait for capitalism to be developed. The road to socialism had to be an uninterrupted one
also.
In 1853 Marx wrote a series of articles on India. These have been recognised as the start of
modern thinking on imperialism. In one of his articles Marx noted that "the profound hypocrisy
and inherent barbarism of bourgeois civilisation lies before our eyes, turning from its home,
where it assumes respectable forms, to the colonies where it goes naked" (The Future Results of
British Rule in India, August 8). He placed great emphasis on forging a strategy of struggle of
the international movement for democracy and socialism.
2
As industrial capitalism grew, so did the working class swell. Lenin analysed the development of
19th century capitalism into the phase of imperialism - the growth of monopoly capitalism and
the colonial system globally. In 1917 he and the Bolshevik Party led the October Revolution
which brought into being a worker's state in Russia. However, in hastening the development of
the productive forces, capitalist approaches were used to modernise and organise the economy,
The October Revolution brought a qualitative change in international relations. A new stage in
the struggle for socialism had been reached. In the Third Communist International (Comintern)
there were fierce debates about the character of the bourgeois democratic movement in the
colonies. The Comintern ultimately came to proclaim that the colonial revolution against
imperialism was no longer solely a bourgeois revolution. Rather, it was part of the world
proletarian revolution against capitalism and for socialism. One could speak now of the 'national
democratic revolution' (NDR).
Bourgeois civilisation in the west was based on enslaving working people in the colonies. In the
struggle for socialism, working class struggles against the bourgeoisie in the capitalist countries
needed to be combined with that of the great masses of the colonised against imperialism.
Imperialism violated the right of oppressed peoples to determine their future for themselves. One
way it did this was to deny them a historical and cultural memory. Or, they were offered an
apocryphal one deriving from the metropolis, theorists have noted.
There has been a long struggle against imperialism in South Africa, including African and
Afrikaner nationalist struggles. The same land came to be occupied by oppressed and oppressor
peoples. They arrived in the modern world along different roads. Still a source of division
among historians is the nature of British imperial policy at the turn of the twentieth century.
Both Boer and Briton then proclaimed their special civilising mission in Africa. They searched
for a common 'native policy' and set up an independent white state in 1910.
Most notable was the way in which the Afrikaner working class was depoliticised. Forsaking
their attack on British imperialism, Afrikaner intellectuals stoked fears of the swartgevaar.
Appeals were made to Afrikaners to unite. They were called on to fight to preserve white
civilisation. Afrikaner nationalism grew, blurring class divisions. It was marked by an extreme
ethnic bias. Women in the churches and cultural organisations contributed to mobilising support
for it.
Also some liberal and Marxist scholars argued over the last century that there was no longer a
national question in South Africa. Yet the segregationist state worked to divide the workers on
racial lines and to put in place structures of the internal colonialism of African people. This gave
impetus to the growth of African nationalism. In addition, the state instigated a system of
codified customary law which distorted African culture and entrenched patriarchy.
African national consciousness emerged in the time of the shift from a pastoral to an industrial
society. It was against the background of imperialist modernisation that struggles for land and
the franchise occurred. Modernist leaders, largely men, ascribed to British imperial ideals of
3
justice, fairness and equality. Most were influenced by nationalist African-American intellectuals
too. One such was Booker T. Washington, who preached education with labour and self reliance.
The nationalist newspapers and journals that were founded helped create a vision of an
alternative society. Yet the link between modernity and the nationalism of the oppressed in South
Africa was not of one mould. In particular, the Gandhian critique of modernity was based on a
fundamental questioning of British imperialism.
After the Second World War the global epoch of the transition from capitalism to socialism
began to take shape. National liberation revolutions took place in this context. In South Africa
the industrial working class was growing. Also, a new generation of modernist leaders of the
oppressed peoples came to the fore. Both men and women and including youth and workers,
they favoured a common society in South Africa.
They began to forge new ways of engaging the people and new approaches to mass mobilisation
in the struggle for democratic rights and against imperialism. Searching for an alternative
modernity, some became wedded to socialism. Yet imperialists fought back to prevent genuine
people's power. South Africa became a bulwark of racism, neo-colonialism and imperialism on
the African continent (Yusuf Dadoo, July 1978).
By the time it entered into a negotiated transition in the 1990s, neo-liberal globalisation was
gathering pace. It was spurred by the collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe. Added to this,
social democratic gains in industrialised countries were being rolled back and perceptions of the
state in Africa as a failed state increased. Newly independent African countries had been faced
with great problems of modernising the economy. They had sought to upgrade standards of
living rapidly, improving health, education and social welfare.
After democracy arrived in South Africa in1994 the move from resistance to reconstruction was
seen. One of the victims seemed to be our racist past. But the efforts to redirect the energies of
the communities, workers, the rural poor, women and youth too easily opposed development to
resistance (Judy Mulqueeny, 1996, p.86). Linked to the reintegrating of the country into the
global market, national development efforts re-assumed the trappings of modernisation. This
proved inimical to history as a critical awareness of our public past.
Knowledge, culture and nature were commodified and privatisation increased (Helen Sheehan,
2009, p.83). Class analysis lost favour, with a greater pre-occupation with livelihoods. There
was also a separating out of the concerns of political and civil society, of the political and social.
As well, the extent to which globalisation is imperialism has been blurred by proponents of neo-
liberalism and post-modernism. They deny the possibility of concepts of totality or 'grand
narratives', such as that of imperialism or of the nation. At issue too is the extent to which
African nationalism in South Africa was a modernist project.
While the process of tying cities to global forces exacerbated fragmentation, decentralisation saw
the rise of localities to prominence. The struggle against imperialism continues in the 21st
century. The struggle to recreate the ‘nation‘, the national market, national production and
4
exchange has once again become a basic historic demand (James Petras, 1997-98). Amid global
economic crisis the hegemony of neo-liberalism is under attack. In Africa the quest for a
democratic development state is seen. There is a rethinking of the relations between the state, the
market, society and the people. Pan-Africanism is once again on the continental agenda also.
II
Debating the National Question
The historiography of the liberation movement in South Africa is vast. Some critiques came from
within, while many of the works are not academic, or are literary. An oral tradition as well as
song, dance and visual art, whose riches largely remain unmined, also forms part of the
histororiography of the movement.
Some of the historiography of the ANC has been triumphalist or functionary. It has masked the
contradictions, tensions and conflicts among leaders or between them and the people or between
the different races, classes and genders involved in united front politics. As well, some popular
versions have "sanitised" or provided simplified versions of a complex history.
On the other hand, some analyses have been biased against the ANC and its alliance partners.
Not objective, these were based largely on information from traitors and defectors. The style of
one writer "resembles a prosecutor rather than an academic". Often there is a reliance on
secondary or more remote sources. Other writers are "captives" of their hypotheses (Vladimir
Shubin, 2002, pp. 1-12).
There is also the challenge of 'amnesia' and nostalgia with regard to apartheid. A related problem
is the silence regarding the works of those intellectuals whose histories offer insights crucial to
nation building but who seem to challenge dominant academic paradigms. There is a dearth of
black academic historians too.
The role of history and historiography in nation building is not a new theme in Africa including
South Africa. History has been and still is hotly contested, as well as being a source of
mobilisation or 'a weapon of struggle'. Our "controversial past" and its significance for the new
South Africa has helped make the task of nation building perilous though (Jakobs Gaard Stolten,
2002, pp. 11 - 17). See in particular debates about the national question.
Pallo Jordan has written that the process of building a nation was central to the national
liberation movement (The South African Liberation Movement and the Making of a New
Nation, 1988). Pixley ka Seme, a founder of the African National Congress in 1912, laid out the
tasks of the national liberation movement. It would have to abolish the colonial relationship;
establish democracy to secure the right of self determination; unite the South African people and
act the midwife at the birth of a new nation.
However by the late 1930s and early 1940s the ANC and the All African Convention (AAC)
were in dispute about which was the premier national organisation. While the ANC departed
from the AAC, the Non-European Unity Movement (NEUM) one of the partners of the AAC,
5
enunciated its Ten Point programme in 1943. It said that the struggle for freedom and the
struggle for land were inseparable. Emphasis was laid also on systematic political education.
This can be contrasted to the Africanist inspired ANC Youth League whose nationalist
philosophy was greatly influenced by the mass struggles of new arrivals in the city.
A complex intertwined relationship developed between the ANC and SACP; between the
national democratic revolution and the struggle for socialism or between national and class
struggle. The main contents of the South African national democratic revolution came to be
defined in the Freedom Charter in 1955. Its theme was ''The People shall govern". With an ethics
of non-racialism and endorsed by the ANC and its alliance partners, the Charter was not a
programme for socialism. Rather it was a common programme for a free and democratic South
Africa agreed on by socialists and non-socialists.
The ANC led alliance invoked a concept of the national question which yoked together the
forces of national liberation and working class revolution. It was based on the principle of
building the broadest united front of patriotic and anti-racist forces against white domination in
South Africa. Also, at the base of nation-building was the need to overturn the legacy of
underdevelopment with its deep rooted racial, class and gender inequalities.
Another NDR theoretical milestone was the South African Road to Freedom. This 1962
programme of the South African Communist Party was based on the two faced nature of
modernity prevailing in one country. It made a major contribution to the political tradition of
indigenising Marxism. An immediate proposal was advanced before the workers and
democratic and patriotic peoples of South Africa. This was for a national democratic state within
the framework of the Freedom Charter.
In 1969 the main thrust of the SACP programme was incorporated in the strategy and tactics of
the ANC at the Morogoro Conference. From then the ANC subscribed to the view that the
contradiction between the colonised black majority and the white oppressor state was the
dominant one. This could not be resolved by the colonial state reforming itself out of existence.
Rather the system of colonial domination had to be overthrown (Pallo Jordan, 1997). The ANC
also motivated that the NDR would be led by the African working class.
After the black workers strikes in 1973 and the Soweto uprising of students in 1976, mass revolt
erupted in the 1980s. The question of the nation in South Africa became highly controversial
wrote Neville Alexander (1986). Some academics propagated the view that after South Africa
became a dominion 1910-31, a national question no longer existed. They arrived at this
conclusion because they equated the national question with the colonial question or the lack of a
peasantry in the country. Reflecting a narrow Eurocentric approach, they misconceived the
national question, over-emphasising class struggle.
At the other exreme were followers of the black consciousness movement. Their argument was
that in 'Azania' were different nationalities without land or other structural property that actually
constituted a single black nationality. Repossession of the land and the seizing of political power
were required to achieve nationhood. Again, 'populists' contended that the struggle by the people
6
for national liberation was more important than the class struggle punted by 'workerists'.
An ANC discussion document entitled The National Question in Post 1994 South Africa (1997)
also was written by Pallo Jordan. He reminded us that there have been intense struggles around
the issues of ethnicity, race, class and gender in the national liberation movement. Was there a
national question post 1994? The answer was in the affirmative, although it had assumed a new
form.
While racialism was no longer institutionalised, both it and different forms of ethnic mobilisation
had been amplified. Racism and ethnicity were functions of the development of South African
capitalism in a colonial milieu. Jordan highlighted the "dependent identities" and "erratic ethnic
consciousness" of the Indian and Coloured working classes (p.4). What should be added now is
the populism and xenophobia of some of the African working people. Also, black working and
poor women have borne the brunt of crises of social reproduction rooted in the legacy of
underdevelopment.
It could be argued that the ANC's Polokwane Conference was a struggle to reclaim the concept
of national democratic revolution over that of bourgeois liberal democracy. On the other hand,
Bundy (2007) asserts that all the debates on the national question in South Africa have produced
no national answer. Raymond Suttner argues the need to debate the NDR concept in the current
conjuncture (Debating NDR: Sunday Dispatch, Dec. 4, 2010).
But the way he splits the three terms 'national', 'democratic', 'revolution', as concepts which do
not have fixed meanings, is ahistorical. The concept of the NDR, as it has been used in the ANC
led alliance in particular, is rendered meaningless it is argued. What must not be denied is the
impact Marxist ideas about imperialism and the national question, particularly those of Lenin,
had on Africa. To help address the unfinished NDR, the history and historiography of the
national question must be reclaimed and reconsidered, it is contended.
Suttner also deprecates what appears to be a "hierarchy of historiographies" (April 2011, p.12) in
South Africa. Premesh Lalu (2008) notes that the 'native question' associated with the
segregationist state greatly influenced the study of history in the first half of the twentieth
century. He points out that the 'Native Republic Thesis' of the Communist Party of South Africa
was shaped in this context.
Yet Lalu highlights the academic reluctance to tackle nationalism as a problem of history now.
This includes the nationalism which opposed apartheid and whose programme is the foundation
of the modern democratic state in South Africa. It is Lalu's argument that if scholarship is to help
deepen democracy it has to renew a critique of apartheid. At the same time, the monopoly by
nationalism to speak in the voice of the oppressed is not unchallenged now, he adds.
Now we are faced with wide ranging 'service delivery protests' or community protests against the
local state. Also, much contemporary debate is focused on the meaning and strategy to build a
development state in South Africa. The debate usually omits the substantial effort made to
reconstruct the local part of the unitary state, in particular, as a development state since 1994. A
7
re-evaluation of its history can help throw light on the extent to which the current state can foster
substantive democracy to complete the NDR.
III
Overview of Debates about Race and Class in South Africa 1920s - 1970s
Bourgeois civilisation arrived in South Africa arm in arm with imperialism. The independence of
its oppressed peoples and their right to self determination was undermined. How to resist this
came to be called the national question. To resolve it issues of race and class had to be addressed.
From early on however there was ambivalence about the 'woman question'. This was even
though from the beginning of the 20th century poor black women started to challenge a national
oppression based on inequalities of race, class and gender. Also, from the late 1920s Communist
Party of South Africa women leaders began to mobilise working women for a common national
struggle with men against colonialism.
The national question was called the 'native question' or 'native problem' by colonial rulers. It
became a controversial and ideological issue. In addressing it from the 1920s both government
policy makers and scholars drew on a whole sequence of government commissions, committees
of inquiry and reports. These works sought to unravel the problems for capital and the state
associated with the great African townward move.
In general, the towns and white farms were portrayed as centres of modernisation, with the
African countryside seen as traditional or backward. Between 1910 and 1948, the 'development
of the reserves' became a key feature of segregationist policy. As migrant labour and influx
control were entrenched, the need to develop the reserves or their agricultural modernisation
assumed central importance in the evolution of a cheap labour policy (Judy Mulqueeny, 1996).
In 1927 the Native Administration Act was passed. A main reason was to contain the perceived
threat to the state posed by the Industrial and Commercial Workers Union (ICU) and the
Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA). The Act helped set in place structures of the internal
colonialism of African people, particularly in the reserves. Associated with it was a propaganda
of differentiation.
At its 1928 meeting in Moscow the Comintern passed a resolution on the South African
Question. This came to be called the The Native (Black) Republic Thesis. It stated that the
development of relations of capitalist production had led to British imperialism carrying out the
economic exploitation of South Africa. Backed by black and white reformists, it formed a united
front with the white bourgeoisie in the country, both Boer and Briton. This did not alter the
general colonial character of the economy though.
The CPSA was faced with exceptionally complicated but favourable conditions stated the
Comintern. It was the only political party that could unite the white and black proletariat and
landless black peasantry for the struggle against British imperialism and its allies. The fight
against anti-native laws needed to be combined with the slogan of an independent native South
8
African republic as a stage towards a workers and peasants republic, with full and equal rights
for all races.
Forming the bulk of the population was the black peasantry. Its land had been expropriated by
the white minority. Hence, the national question in South Africa, based on the agrarian question,
lay at the foundation of the revolution. The CPSA was urged to pay particular attention to
embryonic native organisations such as the ANC. While retaining its independence, the CPSA
should aim to transform the ANC into a fighting national revolutionary organisation of the toilers
against the white bourgeoisie and British imperialism. This constituted one of its major tasks.
It needed also to work out an agrarian programme and plan to organise the native peasants and
agricultural workers, while paying attention to poor agrarian whites. The Thesis was adopted by
the CPSA at its conference in 1929. In propagating it, the Party proclaimed that the struggle for
national liberation was inseparable from the struggle for land. A successful agrarian revolution
would form the basis of the victory of the masses over imperialism and for national
independence.
The Native Republic Thesis paved the way for closer co-operation with the ANC over the longer
term. But it led to intense acrimony within the CPSA, with some of its most committed members
expelled. Socialists also divided on the issue of the relation between town and country. Conflict
centred on the Native Republic Thesis spurred the development of Trotskyism in South Africa,
which itself split over the agrarian question. Trotsky himself responded to the Native Republic
Thesis debates in 1935.
In 1950 the CPSA was banned. Soon after that the Bantu Authorities Act was passed,
propagating ethnic nationhood. Over the years although the state accorded formal recognition of
the chiefs in the homelands, their powers were reduced consider -ably. At the same time the state
extolled those African cultural traditions that had bolstered the authority of the chiefs. Among
these were polygamy and lobola.
The CPSA and later the South African Communist Party (SACP) adapted the Native Republic
Thesis to the changing circumstances of struggle, not least the mass struggles of the 1950s. It
reached full expression in the 1962 Programme of the SACP entitled The South African Road to
Freedom. Here it was noted that the white ruling classes had manufactured a version of the past
of South Africa which they systematically attempted to impose everywhere. Further, South
Africa was characterised as a 'Colonialism of a Special Type' in the Programme.
A new type of colonialism had developed. Geographically the oppressing white nation occupied
the same territory as the oppressed people and lived side by side with them. On one level was
White South Africa. It possessed all the features of an advanced capitalist state in its final stage
of imperialism. The South African monopoly capitalists were closely inked to British, USA and
other foreign imperialist interests, exporting capital abroad, especially to Africa. On another
level was non-white South Africa with all the features of a colony, particularly in the African
reserves.
9
It was this combination of the worst features both of imperialism and of colonialism within a
single frontier which determined the special nature of the South African system. Also, the
workers in the towns comprised the most dynamic and revolutionary force in South Africa. This
class in alliance with the masses of rural people was capable of leading a victorious struggle to
end white domination and exploitation.
The 1962 Programme declared that the revolutionary people could not merely take over the
existing state designed to maintain colonialism. They had to destroy it and create new people's
institutions. A unitary state in republican form should establish new administrative regions.
While local government should be rooted in the progressive traditions of the people of each
region, it also had to conform to the overall character and laws of the people's state.
Large scale planned development of the economy should be controlled and directed by the state.
Most importantly, control of the vital sectors of the economy needed to be placed in the hands
of the NDR state. By demanding the nationalisation of the mining industry, banking and
monopoly industry the foundation would be laid for the advance to socialism. In regard to the
African Revolution, the SACP argued that it was possible for the people in colonial countries to
advance along non- capitalist lines towards the building of socialism.
Yusuf Dadoo later commented on the exceptionally complex interplay of national and class
identified in the 1962 Programme. He wrote that the defining feature of a Marxist-Leninist
approach lay in the indivisible connection between the national question and the solution of the
antagonistic class contradictions between the exploited and the exploiters (July 1978). Others
have acknowledged that this theory of the South African revolution based on an application of
Marxism to indigenous realities has been one of the most important achievements of the SACP.
But in his The Theory of Internal Colonialism - The South African Case (1975) Harold Wolpe
took issue with the CST concept. He was in the unusual position then of being a leading member
of the SACP who also subscribed to the western Marxism of revisionist historians. There was an
unproblematic use of 'imperialism' and 'colonialism' in the wrting on internal colonialism
generally he contended.
Further, under CST, class relations were assimilated to race relations. To this extent it converged
with the conventional race relations theory. It thereby suffered the same analytical limitations.
The simultaneous recognition of the diversity of classes within racial groups on the one hand,
and their homogenous character on the other, forced the SACP into a contradictory position. It
gave the impression that the ruling class was composed of the entire white population. In fact
real power was in the hands of monopoly capitalists.
This work of Wolpe was part of an extensive body of literature that emerged in South Africa in
the 1970s that sought to analyse society from a perspective of class and class struggle (Class
Struggles in the NDR, SACP Discussion Document, 2004). Important insights about the relation
between racial discrimination and national oppression on the one hand, and the processes of
capital accumulation and the exploitation of the working class on the other, were generated.
10
The impetus for this came from white radical students mostly studying at various universities in
the UK. Although they developed their theses as a response to the limitations of the Oxford
History of South Africa, they largely did not subscribe to the concept of the national democratic
revolution. The focus of their criticism was the liberal modernisation thesis which presented
racism as dysfunctional to the development of capitalism.
Liberal scholars and ideologues had used the dual economy concept to argue that agricultural
viability in the reserves was hampered by state interference in the free market. The colour blind
logic of the market would lead to the disappearance of 'race' as a factor in South Africa was their
argument. Roughly between the 1920s and 1970s, historians and other social scientists
consolidated this "liberal-pluralist orthodoxy" (Neville Alexander, 2002).
For the radical scholars racial ideology was functional to capitalist growth. Also, South Africa
was not a dual economy. Rather, it possessed a single forced labour economy of gold and maize.
These insights were based on an argument about black migrant labour largely male and the
mechanisms of cheap labour power. Some of the historians also traced the struggle between
fractions and strata of the dominant classes in the state and the impact on apartheid policies.
The classic work Capitalism and Cheap Labour Power in South Africa: From Segregation to
Apartheid (1972) was written by Wolpe. In it he analysed the transition from segregation to
apartheid in regard to the supply of cheap labour power. With the articulation of two modes of
production, the pre-capitalist mode was both dissolved and conserved by the dominant
capitalistic mode, with the reserves transformed into producers of labour power. To maintain the
system of migrant labour, the state sought to modernise the apparatus of political domination.
This was in the face of an assault on the whole political and economic structure in the 1940s and
1950s by the national liberation movement.
The contending views of liberal and radical historians derive, however, from a wider problematic
it is argued. Some of the best known scholars in South Africa such as Monica Wilson, Colin
Bundy as well as Wolpe grappled with the reasons for the underdevelopment of the Eastern Cape
reserves. In their works they presented an image of the reserves in the forty years after the Land
Act 1913 marked by soil erosion, dessication and falling fertility of the soil.
Agriculture was shown to be stagnant or in decline. As ecological impoverishment gathered
pace, the implication was that the state had to intervene in the reserves to bolster the migrant
labour system by developing the reserves. But in displacing the growing crisis in the policy of
segregation to African agriculture, an ideology of development grew to legitimate increasing
state interference with the productive forces in the reserves.
The segregationist state, including the local councils, served to displace peasant politics and
resistance, generated racial, cultural and gender stereotypes and obcured the nature of the
agrarian question. Thus although accounts varied according to the hue of the paradigm -
Modernisation or Dependency - the portrayal of the ecological decay and agrarian crisis in the
reserves helped perpetuate an ideology of development. The bureaucrats of segregation imposed
an agricultural modernisation and decentralized industrialisation that exacerbated a rural exodus.
11
In Wolpe's later contributions he showed that the state and state policies could not be reduced to
an instrument of any class force. Rather, they were sites of struggle and contestation. In addition
there was a general theoretical failure, he contended, to relate structure to struggle adequately.
This made it difficult to understand the significance of conflicts in relation to political
transformation. Wolpe was critical also of revisionist historians who failed to consider the impact
of popular struggles of the dominated classes on the state.
But in the context of revolutionary and working class mobilisation in the country at the time, the
radical writings galvanised the whole range of social studies. History became one of the most
popular school and university subjects. "Marxism was a pivotal presence in the universities" as
well, with history as the master tool of intellectual resistance (Helen Sheehan, 2009, p.81).
Bernard Magubane's The Political Economy of Race and Class in South Africa published in
1979 was a polemical work directed against the racist apologia widespread in the works of
liberal scholars. In it he traced the systemic aspects of imperialism that fostered inequality and
racism in the South African political economy. The first step in formulating a theory of
inequality and racism in South Africa was to recover a sense of Britain's colonial legacy he
argued. Racial oppression and class exploitation were inextricably intertwined.
Africans were conquered by force and then confronted with a battery of cultural symbols and
weapons. Through these the conquerors justified their superiority. African culture was used as a
yoke in the oppression of African people. From the end of the Anglo-Boer War, South Africa
was integrated into the capitalist world economy by every social, cultural, economic and
geopolitical bond that history could bestow writes Magubane. It was in this era of imperialism
that racist theories were formalised.
Different emphases in the history of 'native policy' were related to the history of the class in
power at a particular time. The colonialist 'white man's burden' was replaced by the 'trusteeship'
of segregation. Unlike previous racist theories, trustee-ship pronounced it possible for those
under guardianship to become civilised people. With the loss of the Cape African franchise, the
ideology of trusteeship was tested. It was buried during the war years.
Apartheid followed as the next systematic falsification suffered by African people. Liberal
scholars presented it as the ideological inheritance of the frontier experience of Afrikaners. As
an ideology, apartheid attempted to cope with the demise of white supremacy around the world
and the wave of colonised nations winning independence. The evolution of apartheid ideology
had to be linked to the contradictions of capitalism also, Magubane argued.
He explained how capital accumulation unfolded in the urban space. The ecological forms seen
in the city were determined by the laws of the capitalist mode of production. South Africa's
urban-industrial areas were the supreme expression of human suffering. Only the revolutionary
emancipation of African men and women and society from capitalist rule and wage slavery
would solve the urban problem. Magubane later noted that for Marx the whole economic history
of society was summed up in the antithesis between town and country. Although an ancient
12
urban tradition had existed in Africa, the colonial city was the creation of imperialism.
"Everyone in it was far from home" (2000).
Both Wolpe and Magubane were cadres of the national liberation movement. Wolpe occupied
important positions in the SACP and Congress of Democrats. Arrested after the Rivonia Raid, he
escaped from prision and went into exile in Britain. Here he became a well known sociologist
and social theorist. That he made important contributions to the development of the theory of the
South African revolution has been widely recognised in the academy. His 1972 article in
particular has been very influential and is still so today although it arouses fierce debate for or
against.
Also instructive is Wolpe's thinking on the relation between research and writing and the policies
and political priorities of a liberation movement. How should scholars relate to the movement
and the democratic government now? Wolpe believed that researchers needed to investigate the
social theories and empirical analysis that inform political strategies. That structural conditions
had an impact on political struggles had to be acknowledged. As to the topics of enquiry, the
relation between race and class or between national and socialist struggle should predominate. It
seems though that before his death Wolpe was moving away from this stance on the role of
intellectuals in national reconstruction.
Magubane was another politically committed intellectual who published widely internationally.
He contributed to an intellectual tradition that was concerned with the role of the city in the
construction of modernity in South Africa. (Ntongela Masilela, 2009). Influenced by SACP
intellectuals such as Albert Nzula and Govan Mbeki, he contributed to a native Marxism in the
country as well. In writing about race and class and the historiography of the liberation struggle,
he tapped into a long tradition of scholarship inspired by the struggles of ordinary people who
fought against oppression. This tradition ranged from the works of du Bois to Cabral to Jack
Simons notes Jimi Adesina (2010).
But Magubane's work has encountered a frosty reception from academics at some South African
universities. His focus on British imperial policy and racism, at a time when it was more popular
to write about class issues from an alternative Marxist perspective, was resisted. He also
subscribes to the concept of national democratic revolution. Adesina believes that the silence
regarding Magubane's work betokens censorship and a form of erasure. It denies the new
generation a sense of their intellectual heritage and of the contributions made to global social
science. Alternative traditions and narratives offered by intellectuals like Magubane are
fundamental to the nation building project is Adesina's contention.
It has been said that a proper history of women's struggles in the South African liberation
movement, which are as old as the liberation struggle, is still awaited. The chief role that women
leaders played was to mobilise black women for a common national struggle with men against
colonialism. At the same time, the struggle for women's emancipation was never subsumed
totally. What helped direct its course was the non-racial class struggle against capitalism. This
enabled the women to place their oppression in the context of the struggle for working class
rights.
13
The achievements of previously oppressed women since 1994 have seemed to be both
exceptional and unexceptional. To understand this development, gender in relation to race and
class needed to have been considered both historically and theoretically. But there has been a
greater focus on overcoming the inequality associated with 'Blacks in general and Africans in
particular'. Also, there has been the belief that national or class struggle would automatically
solve the problems of women's oppression. Yet this overlooked the fact that patriarchy has a
material basis in the sexual division of labour in families and households, is tied to the ownership
of private property and is reproduced in the wider society.
Another challenge is that the women's struggles, largely from below, were linked to social and
not only political impediments. Under segregation and apartheid a developmental welfare state
emerged in South Africa. Both white and black patriarchs in it particularly at local level
attempted to turn black women into rural stay at home private housewives. Into the 1950s, while
women's organisations were able to mobilise women across ethnic and class divides, unlike
elsewhere in Africa they seemed to focus more on social than on political issues. In search of
economic independence, they focused on community development and self help.
IV
Overview of the Historiography of the National Question from the 1980s
The growth of manufacturing industry from the 1950s saw the industrial working class swell.
But economic growth slowed down in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Following the black
workers strikes of 1973 and the Soweto uprising of the youth in 1976, mass upsurges occurred in
the 1980s. Liberated districts emerged in some parts of South Africa. Here rudimentary organs of
people's power were set up in the place of the discredited local councils. The working class both
in workplaces and in communities played the leading role in the struggles for people's power.
There were many debates about the issues of people's education and history, people's and
working class culture or a people's war. Leading analysts of people's power included Mzala and
George Mashamba, both cadres of the liberation movement. The concept of people's power was
not equivalent to that of Parliamentary power. It was that and more. Mashamba wrote:
The dominance of the 'monolithic notion of people's power
as the supreme controlling power in the state' which has to be
seized by the people via the instrumentality of their leading
organisations - the ANC and allied organisations - was
superceded by a 'dispersed notion of people's power that has
to be seized via the instrumentality of the various organs of
people's power' in each and every front of struggle as a
matter of both tactical and strategic priority... People's power
is concerned with people's control of their lives in all aspects
- political, economic, cultural, educational, etc - on a continuing
and local basis (George Mashamba, 1990, pp. 11-12 as quoted in
Blade Nzimande, 1996, p.9)
14
In this context the crucial question was what constituted the nation in South Africa? Neville
Alexander asked this in his book One Azania, One Nation (No Sizwe, 1979). In it and in a series
of papers he also discussed the ways in which different conceptions of the nation in South Africa
were related to the question of the emancipation of the working class.
Alexander has been committed to learning and education for a long time. He was deeply
involved in the struggle against apartheid through guerilla activities and had links with the Non-
European Unity Movement. For ten years he was imprisoned on Robben Island for conspiracy
to commit sabotage. He is a proponent of a multilingual South Africa.
Working class movements had led the struggles for national liberation in a number of nation-
states over the 20th century. Or they had taken the lead in building their nations, Alexander
noted in 1986. In South Africa too the task of building the nation through struggle had fallen to
the black working class. It alone could unite the other oppressed and exploited classes. This was
because it was not implicated in imperialism and capitalism as a beneficiary.
As well, the vanguard organisation of the working class had to project an alternative concept of
the nation. Alexander stressed the vital political and social importance of creating a different
discourse of race and ethnicity and the formative role of language in creating a new national
identity. But the new nation would be realised fully only under socialism. A non-racial
capitalism was impossible in South Africa. Class, colour and nation converged in the national
liberation movement.
One of the foremost activist intellectuals of the liberation movement in the 1980s was Jabulani
'Mzala' Nxumalo. His writings, mostly in struggle journals such as African Communist,
Sechaba and Dawn, are unknown in the country largely. He had fled the country after the
Soweto uprising and joined the ANC and the SACP. Although he had a leading position in
Mkhonto we Sizwe, his main contribution has been an ideological one. He lectured widely on
the relation between national and class struggle in South Africa.
In his Revolutionary Theory on the National Question in South Africa (1988) he argued that
the need to ensure that the liberation struggle contained a strongly organised working class was
the main reason behind the alliance of the ANC and SACP. For them, the solution of the
national question in South Africa could proceed only from the integration of the two nations,
oppressor and oppressed, into a single South African nation under conditions of total equality.
The aim in the future South Africa was the fraternal unity of the workers and peoples of both
nations and all nationalities. This would happen only if the working class headed the process.
Then too could the road from the NDR to socialism be an uninterrupted one.
In his The National Question in the Writing of South African History (1989) Mzala contends
that it was in the writing of history, more than in politics, that the controversies and conflicts
about the presentation of the national question in South Africa were reflected. More than in any
other country, the question of the political implications of historiography was at the root of
debates about the national question.
15
A criticism by Mzala was that most of the earlier historical works seemed to be trapped in
empiricism. They lacked a concept of totality. In these works a burning issue was whether South
Africa had a single history or many histories. The historical question of who South Africa
belonged to was the first and central issue in the presentation of the national question in this
country. As well, the link between the issue of land ownership and the right to self determination
was a common denominator.
Mzala traced divergent historical approaches to the national question:
The Colonialist Tendency: The main body of early written historical knowledge about South
Africa came from white writers such as G. Theal, Donald Moodie and George Edward Cory.
These works provided ideological legitimation for colonial aggression, national oppression and
racial inequality. Historical works written by Africans in their own languages were never
published. Later the establishing of bantustans and ethnic 'nations' was an attempt to deny
nationhood to the black people and the existence of a national question.
The Liberal Tendency: Mzala also reviewed the work of four historians of liberal persuasion -
W.M. Macmillan, C.W de Kiewiet, Monica Wilson and Leonard Thompson. For them the central
theme of history was the integration of South African peoples into a single nation resulting from
the growth of a single economy. They believed that in 1910 South Africa became an independent
nation and the national question ceased to exist then. That Africans had been excluded was an
issue only to the extent that those who were already 'civilised' were not included in the franchise.
In his critique of the Oxford History of South Africa written by Wilson and Thompson, Mzala
notes that it regarded whites as a homogenous ethnic community. It also failed to trace the link
between ethnic differentiation and national unity among Africans historically. The integration of
African ethnic groups into a single nationality should not be oversimplified and presented as
theoretically and historically unproblematic, Mzala adds.
The Nationalist Tendency: Sol Plaatje's novel Mhudi and his Native Life in South Africa
provided a perspective on the views of the emergent intelligentsia who articulated the embryonic
national consciousnesss of the African people. An ANC leader, Plaatje located the common
nationhood of Africans in the question of the land. However, the early nationalists did not assert
the right of the oppressed to national self determination. Instead the legitimacy of the white state
was unquestioned.
Mzala cautions against partisanship in writing about the ANC. "Blank pages in history should
not be allowed. Everything should be told. If needs be, it has to be told dispassionately and
ruthlessly..." (p. 39). There was no shame in portraying the tactics of the early ANC as reformist,
with strong liberal influences, or that by the 1940s it was moribund.
CPSA members in the ANC then made known the Party's championing of majority rule as the
only answer to the solution of the colonial and national question in South Africa. The young
generation of Africans also demanded the transformation of the ANC. Bringing a changed
perspective on nationalism, they urged the ANC to rely on the masses of the people as the true
16
makers of history.
Up to the 1940s there was no history of South Africa from the African nationalist point of view
contends Mzala. The first breakthrough came from a white ex-communist, Eddie Roux. His Time
Longer than Rope was published in 1948. Mzala insists that the issue of the racial origins of
historians is relevant only insofar as it relates to their ability to present history from the point of
view of the national question or the oppressed people.
In Roux's work Africans were presented for the first time in South African history as self
conscious and active protagonists. Like Plaatje's nationalist approach, and contrary to both
colonialist and liberal historiography, Roux's book affirmed the existence of two nations in South
Africa, the oppressor and the oppressed.
The Africanist Tendency: Anton Lembede, who was the leader of the young militant
nationalists of the 1940s, defined Africanism as the spirit of self determination and asserted the
common cultural destiny of African people. But Mzala contends that Africanism in South
African conditions was a narrow version of nationalism. It ignored the complex problem of the
relation between national oppression and class exploitation. Africans were portrayed as a
homogenous category without class or other social conflicts, or with ethnic problems only
between black and white.
Mzala also criticised Pan-Africanists for taking flight into an African continental perspective
while leaving South Africa's national problems unresolved. But he acknowledged the stance of
Robert Sobukwe that not all Africanists subscribed to the doctrine of South African
exceptionalism. Sobukwe's belief was that South Africa was an integral part of Africa. She
could not solve her problems isolated from the rest of the continent.
The Radical Tradition in South African Historiography: Despite not producing many
historical studies, proponents of the Marxist-Leninist tendency had made a truly comprehensive
analysis of the national question says Mzala. The few works produced, such as those by Jack and
Ray Simons and Francis Meli, proved that it was with this ideological stance that most of the
questions posed by South African historiography, and the problems of presenting the national
question, found some initial but not final answers. To understand why the immediate national
goals of the ANC and the SACP converged, a historical study of the national question and of the
relation between class and national struggle was needed. It needed to be examined within a
critique of the theory of the bantustans and its concept of ethnic nationhood. But Mzala died
before he could complete such a study.
It can be added that Class and Colour in South Africa 1850-1950, the work by Jack and Ray
Simons, has been used by the range of Marxists in South Africa. In its foreward the authors
write that the book traces the interactions between the two main streams of resistance to white
domination – the national movements of Africans, Coloureds and Indians and the class struggles
of socialists and communists. The authors add that their book was not a history but an exercise in
political sociology on a time scale.
17
In 1989 the SACP developed a new programme The Path to Power. Seeking to address
criticisms of its 1962 programme, it updated it in the new context. "The path to power lies with
the masses" it proclaimed (p. 24). Mass political energy had to be harnessed and its enormous
potential realised. This continued to be the dominant task of the liberation vanguard. While there
was no conflict between an insurrectionary perspective and the possibility of a negotiated
transfer of power, the masses were the key. "Our working class is the decisive force to bring
about the collapse of racism and victory in the NDR as a stage towards building a socialist South
Africa" (p.30).
In a more recent study (An Ordinary Country - Issues on the Transition from Apartheid to
Democracy in South Africa, 2002), Alexander arrives at broadly similar conclusions to Mzala in
terms of his survey of the historiography of race and class. But he also raises pertinent issues not
considered by Mzala. The colonial history of South Africa differed from other European settler
colonies in that, with one important exception, it did not result in the genocidal eradication of the
indigenous peoples, he argues. He comments that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
report should be considered as historiography, including its nation building aspect.
It is clear that Alexander subscribes to the concept of 'bourgeois democratic revolution' but not to
the 'national democratic revolution'. This strengthens his argument that South Africa is now an
ordinary country and not exceptional. But based on what we have shown in this paper, his
argument is not convincing.
There is a more prononced focus on Afrikaner historians in his work than Mzala showed.
Afrikaner-nationalist historians - Thom 1936; Van Der Merwe 1938; Muller 1969 among others
- continued to write in crude racist ways long after most English speaking historians had
jettisoned these frameworks of the late 19th century. But in the main in both colonialist and
liberal histories, African people were presented as an undifferentiated and passive mass who had
not yet become historical actors. In more recent writing Alexander agrees we have to contend
with an unfinished revolution in South Africa.
Of relevance are the paradigms that continue to predominate in the production of historical
knowledge now. Sheehan (2009) notes the contradictory transformations at universities. There
have been trepidations about the decline in the popularity of history as a subject while
controversies centred on Africanisation continue to reverberate. Marxism is still, to an extent, a
popular way of viewing the world in tertiary education, in the state and elsewhere. But it has had
to contend with the post-modernist and neo-liberal onslaught.
What must be interrogated as well is how far the transforming of the institutions that control the
production and dissemination of historical knowledge has proceeded. Political suppressions
must be exposed, silenced voices liberated and audiences reconceptualised (M. Cross, 1994). It
should be acknowledged also that historical knowledge is being produced in a number of sites
beyond the academy. Its validation as knowledge is a nettle to be grasped. This includes the
collective developing of revolutionary theory, which should be based on learning from history,
and its relation to strategy.
18
In 1985 on the 30th
anniversary of the Freedom Charter Mzala paid tribute to its significance in
the history of our country. He wrote that it was a uniting force of all the people who were
struggling for democracy and national rights, a mirror of the South Africa yet to be won. But its
implementation was impossible without the complete dismantling of the white state and its
political and economic foundation. That was what made the Freedom Charter revolutionary.
(Mzala Nxumalo, 1985).
The ideological struggle was most important Mzala added, given ideological trends in the
national liberation movement – factionalism, racial prejudice, chauvinism, tribalism and anti-
communism. Other commentators have contended too that while the concept of colonialism of a
special type may be a pregnant one it needed to be allied to a broader explanatory approach.
Employed as a tool to explain our South African world from the 1940s, perhaps it needs to be
updated or refined in our changed context as well.
In the early 1990s Mzala commented that the SACP had not paid sufficient theoretical and
practical attention to the development of a socialist perspective (Colin Bundy, 1991). The
challenge was to translate populism about socialism among the working people into something
organized and reliable and a real force for the building and defence of socialism. That challenge
has become more relevant now.
Finally, we must learn from socialist Cuba in the 1990s when it was faced with overwhelming
challenges after the crash of socialism in Eastern Europe. Not only did it reconfigure the relation
between social and economic development. But it also sought to drive an accelerated 're-
cubanisation' that re-installed Cubans in the world in a new way. Cuban identity was conceived
as a crucible which lives in popular traditions. These were critically examined and made
accessible to the people with a struggle against elitist, racist and populist stereotypes. National
identity was expressed in a process of constant renewal and recreation.
REFERENCES
Adesina, Jimi 2010 Bernard Makhosezwe Magubane at 80, HSRC Review, Vol. 8, No.3,
September
Alexander, Neville 1986 Approaches to the National Question in South Africa, Transformation
1
2002 An Ordinary Country – Issues in the Transition from Apartheid to
Democracy in South Africa, University of Natal Press Pietermaritz –
burg
Bundy, Colin 1991 Marxism in South Africa: Context, Theories, Challenges,
Transformation, 16
2007 Constructing the Past in Post-Apartheid South Africa in History Making
and Present Day Politics: The Meaning of Collective Memory in South
Africa
Edited by Hans Erik Stolten, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrika Institutet
Cross, M. 1994 Changing Frontiers of Academic Discourse: Knowledge, Power and the
19
Production of History in South Africa, History Workshop, 13-15 July,
University of Witwatersrand
Dadoo, Yusuf 1978 South Africa: Revolution on an Upgrade, World Marxist Review,
Prague, July
Jakobs Gaard Stolten, 2002 The Discussion about South Africa: the Research Debate on
Apartheid until 1994, 9th
Conference of Africanists in Moscow.
Africa in the Context of North-South Relations, 21-23 May
Jordan, Pallo 1988 The South African Liberation Movement and the Making of a New
Nation in The National Question in South Africa, Zed Books, London
1997 The National Question in Post 1994 South Africa, ANC Discussion
Document for 50th
National Conference
Lalu, Premesh 2008 When was South African History ever Post-Colonial? Kronos,
Bellville, Vol. 43, No. 1, November
Magubane, Bernard 1979 The Political Economy of Race and Class in South Africa, Monthly
Review Press, New York
2000 African Sociology: Towards a Critical Perspective: The Collected
Essays of Bernard Makhosezwe Magubane, Trenton, New Jersey
Marx, Karl 1853 The Future Results of British Rule in India, New York Daily Tribune,
August 8
Masilela, Ntongela 2009 Forword: New Africanism in a Post – New African Age, Pzacad.
Pitzer, Edu/Nam/General/Essays/Forword.PDF
Mulqueeny, Judy 1996 From Resistance to Development: A History, Current Writing, October,
Vol. 8(2)
‘Mzala’ Nxumalo 1985 The Freedom Charter and its Relevance Today. Article written by
Mzala on the occasion of the 30th
Anniversary of the Freedom Charter
1988 Revolutionary Theory on the National Question in South Africa in
The National Question in South Africa, Zed Books, London
1989 The National Question in the Writing of South African History – A
Critical Survey of Some Major Tendencies, Working Paper 22,
Development Policy and Practice, The Open University, Milton Keyes
No Sizwe (Neville Alexander) 1979 One Azania, One Nation. The National Question in South
Africa, Zed Books, London
Nzimande, Blade 1996 The Left and Local Government, African Communist, First Quarter
Petras, James Nov. 1997 – Feb. 1998 A Marxist Critique of Post-Marxism, Links
Plaatje, Sol 1998 Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and
the Boer Rebellion, Out of Copyright, Project Gutenburg, Sept.
1930 Mhudi, Penguin, Global
Sheehan, Helen 2009 Contradictory Transformation: Observations on the Intellectual
Dynamics of South Africa, Journal for Critical Educational Policy
Studies, Vol. 2, No.1
Shubin, Vladimir 2002 Historiography of the ANC: Conflicting Views, Historical Conference,
Copenhagen
Simons, H.J. & R.E. 1969 Class and Colour in South Africa, Penguin, London
Programme of the South African Communist Party 1962 South African Road to Freedom
Programme of the South African Communist Party 1989 The Path to Power
20
Resolution on the South African Question (Native Republic Thesis) 1928 Adopted by the
Executive Committee of the Communist International following the 6th
Comintern Congress, Moscow
South African Communist Party Discussion Document 2004 Class Struggles in the NDR. The
Political Economy of Transition in South Africa
Suttner, Raymond 2010 Sunday Dispatch, December 4
2011 Revisiting National Democratic Revolution: the ‘National Question’,
April. Paper to be presented to Dept. of Sociology, Anthropology
and Development Studies Seminar, University of Johannesburg
Wolpe, Harold 1972 Capitalism and Cheap Labour Power in South Africa: From
Segregation to Apartheid, Economy and Society, 1 (4)
1975 The Theory of Internal Colonialism – The South African Case, Harold
Wolpe Trust, Cape Town
21
22