Post on 05-Feb-2018
transcript
API Spec Q2 Quality Requirements for E&P Service Providers
Stacey Hagen – Global Quality Team Lead
March 06, 2012
Operator Perspective
Objectives Provide history and operator expectations on API Spec Q2
Outline • Business Drivers • Overview API Subcommittee 18 Task Group 5 – API Spec Q2 • API Spec Q2 Elements Specific to Drilling Services • Beta Test Audits • Expectations for Compliance
Agenda
• Non-Productive Time (NPT) Failures, unreliability,
breakdowns, inefficiencies, plans gone wrong, time wasted and money wasted
Problem events with Drilling’s stewardship which interrupt the critical path activity − Planned operations required
in order to complete the stewarded work
Business Drivers
• Increasing complexity of wells Need for improved service technology
and equipment / tool reliability • Increasing spread rates on rigs Need for systems to ensure
uninterrupted operations
Business Driver
Business Driver
• Root Causes for NPT Competency / Training Lack of procedures Not following procedures Lack of inspection/test No Contingency Planning Lack of a Preventative
Maintenance, Inspection , Test Programs
Lack of Use History Logs
Business Driver
• Inconsistent Global Quality Business Driver
• ExxonMobil Requirements Not always specified API Spec Q1 for
manufacturing Contract requirements
specific to customer Variation in customer
requirements leads to inconsistent global Quality
Business Driver
• ExxonMobil Critical Quality Requirements
• Created Task Group 5 under SC18 • Developed and balloted document
in less than 9 months • Published December 15, 2011 • Standardizes the expectations for
execution of upstream services including well construction, intervention, production and abandonment
• Two regulatory agencies looking at document for application in offshore and line pipe construction activities
Need for Industry Standardization
SC18
TG 1 TG 2 TG 3 TG 4 TG 5 TG 6 TG 7
Auditor Effectiveness
CSOEM
API Spec Q1
Monogram Program
Min. Mfg. Requirements
API Spec Q2
Welding Life Cycle Management
Sub Committee 18 Structure
Operators:
• ExxonMobil • BP • Chevron • Hess • Shell • Total
Service Companies
• Baker • Cameron • FMC • Halliburton • NOV • Schlumberger • Tenaris • Transocean • Weatherford
Interested Parties:
• TIEC • QSI
SC18 Task Group 5
• Competency / Training of Personnel • Risk Assessment and Management • Contingency Planning • Purchasing Control for Critical / Non-Critical Services • Service Quality Plan • Preventative Maintenance, Inspection and Test • Service Performance Validation • Management of Change
Drilling Service Specific Additions
• Appropriate Education
• Training • Skills • Experience
Competency of Personnel
• Testing • Practical • Problem
Solving
• Identify risks (potential and real) • Select, communicate and implement
mitigation or preventive control measures to reduce or avoid exposure to loss
• Notify customer of remaining risks that may impact the service
Risk Assessment and Management
- Actions required for significant risk - Assignment of responsibility & authority - Internal and external communications
Integration
Disruption Prevention
Mitigation Measures
Contingency Planning
• History • Risk • Reliability • Spares
Service Quality Plan • Details for execution of service • Identifies acceptance
inspection (W, M, H and DR) • Identifies control of
subcontracted activities • References to procedures,
specifications, work instructions
• Identifies acceptance criteria • Communicated to the
customer
Preventive Maintenance, Inspection, Test
• Preventive maintenance • Use History Logs • Critical Spare Parts • Controls for Equipment Integrity
Reso
urce
s
-90+ 0 40 10 20 160+ 80
Risk Assessment
Drilling Operations
Design of Service
PM Programs
Contingency Planning
Maintenance & Critical Spares
• Assembly Insp / Test
QA/QC
• Service Performance
Validation •BHA Inspections
•MOC
Critical Suppliers
Time ( rig days) (AFE) Spud
Operations Support
• Well Integrity Reduction of NPT
Contractor Influence
API S
pec
Q2
• Tool Insp @ delivery
Competency
Service Quality Plans
Development of a Users Guide • Identifies expectations for requirements • Provides guidance to Industry for implementation • Utilized to train API Auditors / Staff • SC18 TG5 SC18 TG5 Chairman: Jim Hood – Chevron Jim.Hood@chevron.com
Forward Plan for API Spec Q2
Industry Forum • Held on February 23, 2012 in Houston, Tx • Used to gain input from industry on the type of
certification program that is needed • Attempt to identify the impact to Drilling Service
Industry • Address API Staff questions • Determine time line to implement requirements
Forward Plan for API Spec Q2
• Beta Test Audits − gaps, hurdles and milestones for auditing to Q2 − Identify competencies / training for API Staff / Auditors − Identify needed resources − Types of certifications needed to meet industry needs
Forward Plan for API Spec Q2
• Baker • Weatherford • Halliburton
ExxonMobil Expectations
• Compliance to API Spec Q2 (Inclusion in Contracts) • Service Suppliers to develop gap analysis and
communicate to customers • Service Suppliers to identify a global roll-out plan
based on risk and activity • Hot spots will require immediate attention • Target for certification - Year End 2013
Forward Plan for API Spec Q2
API Spec Q1 Monogram
License
API Spec Q2
• API Spec Q1 is being re-written to match Q2 Flow • Rewrite enables single system for dual applications
Questions?