Post on 25-Feb-2016
description
transcript
Applying a Health Lens to Public Facility Design
Dr. Lisa Richards, Medical Officer of Health, Winnipeg Regional Health AuthorityCPHA Conference, Toronto
May 28, 2014
CLASP Project Team
WRHA- Population and Public Health ProgramDeanna Betteridge- Physical Activity Promotion ManagerSarah Prowse- Acting Physical Activity Promotion MangerShelagh Graham- Healthy Built Environment SpecialistDr. Lisa Richards- Medical Officer of HealthDr. Lawrence Elliott- Medical Director
City of Winnipeg- Planning, Property & DevelopmentAndrew Ross- Planner, Urban Planning DivisionSusanne Dewey-Povoledo- Planner
OverviewBackgroundObjectivesPartnerships (4)Tool: Active Design ChecklistPreliminary FindingsReflections &Successes
Social Planning Council ∙ MMM Group ∙ Province of Manitoba (Local Government; Healthy Living, Seniors & Consumer Affairs; Manitoba Health) ∙ University of Manitoba (City Planning; Office of Sustainability; Kinesiology & Recreation Management) ∙ Bike Winnipeg ∙ City of Winnipeg (Council; Public Works; Planning, Property & Development; Winnipeg Transit) ∙ Professional Interior Designers Institute of Manitoba ∙ Green Action Centre ∙ Heart & Stroke Foundation ∙ Health in Common ∙ Dillon Consulting ∙ WRHA (Chronic Disease Collaborative; Injury Prevention Program) ∙ University of Winnipeg (Kinesiology)
CLASP HCBD Winnipeg
If you want to go fast, go alone.If you want to go far, go together.
- African Proverb
Senior Management
City of Winnipeg staff
Local stakeholders
University of Manitoba
Building Strategic
Relationships
Supporting Research & Evaluation
Exploring Promising Practices
Building Sustainability
Applying a Health Lens to Public Facility Design
Leading by Example?
Issue Identification- WRHA Access Centers
WRHA Access River East
WRHA QuickCare Clinic
Project Outcomes- Short Term To enhance the consideration of active design, collaboration
mechanisms: Are established- between WRHA Population and Public
Health and Capital Planning Are explored- between WRHA and City of Winnipeg
Increased awareness and understanding of opportunities and challenges of applying a health lens to public facility design.
Increased understanding of the points in decision-making processes where active access related decisions are made.
Project Outcomes- Long Term The incorporation of a health lens into WRHA
tendering and selection processes. Potential consideration of practical planning process
and policy amendments that support healthy and active community design.
Improvement of active design elements in public facilities.
Active Design Checklist for Public Facilities
Criteria to provide guidance for how to design public facilities in order to promote active access
http://www.cite7.org/resources/documents/ITERP-PromotingSustainableTransportationThroughSiteDesign.pdf
Active Design Checklist- Overview
1. Site Selection2. Building Placement &
Orientation3. Site Design4. Pedestrian Access &
Amenities5. Bicycle Access & Amenities6. Building Design & Context
Partnerships
Winnipeg Regional Health AuthorityCity of WinnipegUniversity of ManitobaReh-Fit Centre
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
“…an innovative way to deliver a range of health and social services to a community."ACCESS St Boniface
City of WinnipegEast Elmwood Community Centre“A new facility in an existing community place”
http://umanitoba.ca/admin/campus_planning_office/media/SW_Gate_Location_Map4_(FINAL).pdf
http://www.visionaryregeneration.com/media/Southwood_Riverbanksm3.jpg
University of Manitoba
Southwood Lands “… transforming the Fort Garry campus into a new, sustainable 24/7 ‘live, work, learn, play’ community”
http://www.communitynewscommons.org/newstoyoueic/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Reh-Fit-Centre-crop.jpg
Reh-Fit CentreExpanding and enhancing a well used medically-based fitness center
Key Informant Interviews
1. Current processes and tools used for new builds?2. Active Design Checklist
• Utility of the checklist? • Criteria that were easy/a challenge to consider or
incorporate?• Criteria that prompted you to plan your facility differently?
3. Opportunities for integrating the checklist criteria into existing processes and tools?
Preliminary Findings:1. Current Considerations and Tools
• Site Selection, Design and Layout• Building Design and Layout• Pedestrian and Bicycle Access/Amenities
Preliminary Findings:2. Active Design Checklist• Some criteria are already incorporated;
others will be a challenge• Illustrations could be helpful• Expansion of checklist- building interior
Preliminary Findings:3. Integration of Checklist into Planning Tools
• Opportunity to apply select criteria at: o RFP stageo Selection stage
• Also- policy development, audits, prioritization of capital improvements
• Benefit as a stand alone tool for decision-makers
Reflections…
• Site selection, design and layout- extremely important but not always prioritized
• Parking stall expense is an opportunity!• Loved the checklist… but harder to incorporate into
current processes• Introduced checklist at later stages of development-
limited opportunity for change• Bureaucratic realities (e.g. funding delays)• Benefit of internal champion as “agent of change”
Successes to Date
• Education of key decision makers• Better understanding process and tools for decision
making • Refinement of Active Design Checklist• Insight into challenges of applying certain checklist
criteria• Developed relationships within our own
organizations, and identified opportunities to influence policy change
Contact Information:Dr. Lisa Richards, Medical Officer of Healthlrichards@wrha.mb.ca 204-612-1581, Winnipeg, Manitoba