Post on 02-Feb-2020
transcript
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / lisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Army Environmental Quality
Budget Update
14 June 2010
Ms. Lisa J. Smith
Army Environmental Division
Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management
Headquarters, Department of the Army
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE 14 JUN 2010 2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Army Environmental Quality Budget Update
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Army Ofc of the Assistant Chief of Staff for InstallationManagement,Army Environmental Division,600 Army Pentagon,Washington,DC,20310-0600
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the NDIA Environment, Energy Security & Sustainability (E2S2) Symposium & Exhibitionheld 14-17 June 2010 in Denver, CO.
14. ABSTRACT
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as
Report (SAR)
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
15
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Agenda
Status of POM 12-17 for Environmental Quality
Current Army Planning Programming,
Budgeting and Execution (PPBES) Process
Changes to PPBES Process
Environmental Quality Requirements Building
Process
2 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
POM12-17 Results
Guidance allowed for NO GROWTH
Current numbers posted 8 JUN 10
Critical Requirements for Environmental Quality
(MDEP VENQ) were approved
– No issues with the requirements generation process
– Environmental Cost Standardization (ECS) output
generally accepted
– Staffing standard output was approved
– ACUB projects with Conservation compliance
drivers approved
– Non-recurring projects presented were approved
3 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Environmental Quality (EQ)
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
VENQ Requirements
VENQ Funding
Compliance Rqmts
Compliance Funding
Conservation Rqmts
Conservation Funding
Pollution Prev Rqmts
Pollution Prev Funding
VENQ Requirements and Funding by Program
$K
4 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Environmental Quality (EQ)
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
VENQ Requirements
VENQ Funding
OMA Rqmts
OMA Funding
OMNG Rqmts
OMNG Funding
OMAR Rqmts
OMAR Funding
VENQ Requirements and Funding by Appropriation
$K
5 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Army PPBES Process
Army PPBE’s main objective is to establish, justify,
and acquire the fiscal and manpower resources
needed to accomplish the Army’s assigned
missions in executing the Defense Strategy
Planning
Programming and
Budgeting
Program
Execution
Budget
Execution
Size, structure, man equip, train
and sustain the Army force
Distribute projected manpower,
dollars, and materiel among
competing requirements Convert resource allocation
decisions into congressional
requests
Manage and account
for funds in approved
programs
Apply resources to
achieve approved
program objectives
6 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Environmental Quality Reporting
DOD Financial Management Regulation (FMR)
– Volume 2A, Chapter 3 and Volume 2B, Chapter 19
– Requires detailed information on execution and
programmed funding amounts by program/media
President’s Budget Request
– Budget Justification Books
– Uses same information submitted above
Defense Environmental Programs Annual
Report to Congress (DEPARC)
– Chapter 1: Defense Environmental Funding
– Uses same information submitted above
http://deparc.xservices.com/do/home
7 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Environmental Quality Reporting
DUSD (I&E) POM 12-16 Installation and
Environmental Overview
– Detailed brief which includes detail by environmental
program and media
– Uses same information submitted above
We must have accountability of how we plan, program,
budget, and execute our resources by program/media
and explain any variations
8 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Current POM Timeline
ACC – Army Commander’s Conf SRG – Senior Review Group TAP – The Army Plan ACOM – Army Command
POM – Program Objective Memorandum BES – Budget Estimate Submission TAA – Total Army Analysis TGM – Tech Guidance Memo
PPGB – Planning Program Budget Comm PEG – Program Element Group DPG – Def Planning Guidance ARB – Army Resources Board
OSD – Office Sec of Defense P&F – Program and Financial J-Book – Justification Book
Source: How the Army Runs
9 of 15
* U.S.ARMY
Current POM Timeline
ACOM POMIBES to HODA
Major events PEG Rqmts
Build complete PEG POMIBES PPBC PEG BRP
complete POMIBESIAppn Rev Prlortlutlon POMIBES toOSD
ACC /
PPBC Sched8 Review
I
PPBC Rqmta Review
/
PPBC PEG I PPBC I PPBC
'- / Prlort;z.ation // ARB Prep j GDF TAA09
algned Reaulta
BRP)
Requirement•
/ BRP
ARB Prep EOH
BRP TAP
BRP ScheduleS
TGMI Stalking Guid
BRP PF1/PF2 EOH Review POM/BES Decisions
POMIBES Planning Coni -
Central processess
ACOM PEG Requirements POMIBES Build Build
PEG Prlorltutlon
PIF Statement a J·Book Preparation
OSD Prog/Bdgt Review begins
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Current Program and Budget Review
POM – Program Objective Memorandum FYDP – Future Years Defense Program OSD – Office Sec of Defense DPG – Def Planning Guid
BES – Budget Estimate Submission PAE – Dir Program Analysis & Evaluation PDM – Program Decision Memo MBI – Major Budget Issue
SECDEF – Secretary of Defense OMB – Office of Management and Budget P&F – Program and Financial J-Book – Justification Book
PRG – Program Review Group DRB – Defense Review Board
Source: How the Army Runs
10 of 15
* U.S.ARMY
Current Program and Budget Review
POM FY DP Issue OuUines (start) to OSD to PAE
POMIBES\POMIBES la•ue OuHine Lock to OSD Disposition lllemo / l I
QDF complal~e laauiiS clreutatoo
Major events
Anal Preaidential declslons
Pre.klenta Budget To Congress
SECDEF Final PBDs
Oct Nov
OSDdatabaM ( lock
OSD final loci!/ Budget to OMS
DPG Compliance Brief to OSD
MBI eeaelon OSD-Army Prea.s conf'erence
Program and BudiJcl Exhibit• posted to oso Web Site
P&F statement & ) OSD Program J.Book Prep!lrotion Review
•
• PAE reconclllea
FYDP PIISS to OSO
Central processes
OSO Program/Budget RI!Vii!W
Oct Nov
PRG and ORB meetings
• Major Budget lsaUIIS
R""lew
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
PPBES Process Changes
9 APR 2010 OSD Memorandum, Subject: “Procedures
and Schedule for FY2012-2016 Integrated
Program/Budget Review”
Guidance for the Development of the Force and the
Joint Planning Guidance will be combined into the
Defense Planning and Programming Guidance (DPPG)
Department will submit single year budgets each year
Annual program/budget reviews will be 5 years
(POM12-16, POM13-17, POM14-18, etc.)
Department will conduct Front End Assessments to
address major issues which focus on strategic issues
that will impact resource allocations (summer/early fall)
11 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Revised Timeline
30 JUL: Component POM/BES submission due
2-13 AUG: Component POM Briefs
3 SEP: Budget justification materials due to
OSD/OMB (POM Locked and exhibits due)
22 NOV: Program/budget review complete
7 FEB: Presidents Budget released
12 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
EQ Requirements Generation Process
13 of 15
EQ Requirements Generation Process
NON-RECURRING & NON-ECS REQTS. FOR INSTALLATONS See NRJ
~;::::;:======::;:;------=-=::~ Det;oii Noo-ll~urrlng &
Non-ECS ftequhmffil Process
• ~lol·fiecurring
· Range IViUga!ion · A'M')' initiatives
· Recurring N(( ir ECS
Non-R.....nn, ~ ~on-ECS
Re:jllitemen:s 1 ,
fer ln•lall<lio./
~......._-1 ,
RECURRING REQTS. FOR INSTAL LA TONS See ECS J _ r.;::=::::::::::::::::;--..;....---..;...,=""" Del~ I
Envfronmenl.al Cost 6tandardlzatlon
IECS)Illodel
\
Command Budget
Requlremem Process (ll,AIM·ISE. USACE,
IMCCM. NGB, =les:erves1 AM:,
MEOCOM, SMDC;
I
¢ \
-Rf(Urrilg
Requfrerren:s for
lnllallati/
Re~uiremen:s for
Commands 1
./ -- _i
Roqulr01nonls Validation Process · OMJC
· Validatior • l'nal)"lisl
Adjustments - .Opprovat
.. Stakehdder
Meetings ~~=~ SeeCMD Bu~
Valida! on
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
EQ Requirements Generation Process
Integrate data collection into existing processes
– AEDB-EQ – data for model
– PROBE (manpower authorizations)
– STEP or spreadsheets – non-recurring requirements
Quality Control of data
– Use existing processes to ensure quality data
– QA/QC important
– Data variance will affect model output
Establish a timeline to submission
– Backcast submission dates and data calls to be
used14 of 15
Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / llisa.j.smith@us.army.mil 140014JUN2010
Questions???
ECS Documentation on AKO:
https://www.us.army.mil/suite/files/22613161
BRM website: http://brm.army.mil
Ms. Lisa Smith
Army Environmental DivisionAssistant Chief of Staff for Installation
ManagementHeadquarters, Department of the Army
703-601-1563
lisa.j.smith@us.army.mil
15 of 15