Post on 26-Mar-2015
transcript
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Representation of Markush structures — from molecules towards patents
Szabolcs Csepregi
Solutions for Cheminformatics
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Contents
• ChemAxon
• What are Markush structures?
• How to get them?
• What can be done with them?– Enumeration– Storage, search
• Challenges in chemical representation
• Under development
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
ChemAxon
• Cheminformatics toolkits and applications
• HQ: Budapest, Hungary
• Founded: 1998
• Main customers: pharma, biotech, publishing
• 3rd party applications and web sites. (e.g. Integrity, Reaxis, PDB ligand search, ELN-s, registration systems, etc)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
ChemAxon
Main products:– Structure drawing & visualization (Marvin family)– Chemical DB tools (JChem family)– Property predictions (Calculator plugins)– Drug discovery tools (Reactor, JKlustor, etc.)
Development strategy: customer-driven
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
What are Markush structures
and how to get them?
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush structures
Generic notation for describing many molecules (= Markush library) in a compact form.
Main usage:– Combinatorial chemistry– Chemistry-related patents
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush structures
• Current features handled:– R-groups– Atom lists, bond lists– Position variation bond– Link nodes– Repeating units– Homology groups
(aryl, alkyl, etc.)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
ChemAxon Markush project
Goals:– Extend structural search capabilities to combinatorial Markush
structures– Markush enumeration
Complications:– Practical examples may be very complex, methods using
explicit enumeration may be impossible– Extension of current molecular formats (generic features)
Timeline – Pilot study started in 2005 Q4, – First prototype shown at UGM, 2006 June– Released in JChem 5.0, 2008– Markush DARC format support 5.3.0 2010
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
How to get Markush structures?
• Drawing – Marvin Sketch
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
How to get Markush structures?
• Patent literature – Markush DARC format (*.vmn)
• Compatible with Thomson Reuters MMS patent Markush database(Test set available.)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
How to get Markush structures?
Combinatorial chemistry – Reagent clipping 1. Replace reacting group with attachment point
(Reactor tool)
2. Turn fragments to R-group definitions (Molconvert tool)
3. Add a scaffold (Molconvert tool)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
How to get Markush structures?
Combinatorial chemistry – R-group decomposition1. Filter and identify ligands in chemical library
2. Create Markush structure from R-table
(R-group decomposition tool)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
What to do with them?
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush Enumeration
• Markush enumeration plugin– Full enumeration– Selected parts only– Random enumeration– Calculate library size– Scaffold alignment
and coloring– Markush code– Optional example
homology groupenumeration
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush storage & search
• JChem Base and Instant JChem
• No enumeration involved
• Can handle complex Markush structures (1040 or more)
• Substructure and Full structure search
• Broad translation of homology groups is supported. (Homology in DB, specific in query.)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush storage & search
Substructure hit visualization
Query
Result in original Markush
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Markush storage & search
Substructure hit visualization: „Markush structure reduction”
Query
Result in original Markush
Reduced result
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Main use cases
• Patent search hits refining / visualization,
• White space analysis,
• Patent busting,
• Markush structure curation,
• In-house storage of small Markush DB,
• etc...
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
MMS evaluation Instant JChem project
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenges in chemical representation(solved)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Representation - What we already had
Generic notation in queries:
• Atom lists, bond lists
• R-group queries (Problem: RGFile R-logic and patent R-logic are different! - Solution: Just ignore R-logic.)
• Link nodes
• Some generic atoms (X) – represented as pseudo atoms.
Single or doubleSingle or double
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 1: Attachment point
• Multiple – ligand order and attachment orderHeavily used in Markush DARC (up to 8 attachments!)
• Represented as atom property
Parent group(root)
R-group definitions
Order of ligands for G15 (R15)
Order of ligands for G15 (R15)
Attachment points for definitions
Attachment points for definitions
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 1: Attachment point
• Embedded R-groups: Grandparent relations may be needed between attachment points:
G3’s attachment point „1” is mapped to
G4’s attachment point „1”
G3’s attachment point „1” is mapped to
G4’s attachment point „1”
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 1: Attachment point
• Temporary representation: attached data– ligand order– attachment point in R-group definition– still an atom property– ligand order sometimes in parent group
(grandparent relation)
Order of ligands for R2
Order of ligands for R2
Attachment points for definitions
Attachment points for definitions
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 1: Attachment point
• Real attachment object with bond (under development)
– eliminates need for grandparent relations table:
Order of ligands for R4
Order of ligands for R4
Attachment point for R3
Attachment point for R3
Order of ligands for R2
Order of ligands for R2
Attachment points for definitions
Attachment points for definitions
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 2: Abbreviations
• Superatom S-groups were originally in Marvin (~700 built-in shortcuts)– Expand / Contract – Search code already handled them
in specific structures.
• M. DARC had 21 shortcuts + 31 peptides.
• Attachment point next to abbreviations– Needed to be visible „outside” and handled
correctly „inside”.– New attachment point solves this also:
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 3: Homology groups (generics)
• Pseudoatom representation
• Naming (Still looking for the most descriptive „long” names.)
• Extra conditions: general atom property framework (under development)
Markush DARC name „Long name”
CHK alkyl
CYC carboAlicyclyl
ARY carboAryl
HEA heteroMonoAryl
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 4: Frequency variation
• Link nodes
• Repeating units: modified SRU
• Multipliers: – special SRU, 1 outer bonds. – (Currently visualization only.)
• Moieties: – special SRU, 0 outer bonds – to describe (variable) stoichiometry– (Currently visualization only.)
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Challenge 5: Position variation bond
• New special S-group type
• Relocatable multicenter atom represents group for bonds
• Also useful to represent multicenter charge and coordination compounds:
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
What (else) keep us busy
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Under development
• Further improvements in Markush DARC support:– Ring segment groups (XX form a ring)
– New, more robust representation for attachment points
– Homology properties (low alkyl, fused aryl, C1-3, N2-5, etc)
• Ranking of results
• New ways to navigate/zoom Markush structures
• Maximum common substructure search
• Biased enumeration and covering Markush – based on examples in patent.
• Improve search speed to handle larger Markush sets.
• Other Markush formats – Markush InChI standard committee
• Overlap analysis of Markush structures
• Conditions for Markush variables
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Summary
• Markush structure storage, search and enumeration at ChemAxon now patent coverage
• Compatible patent data is available from Thomson Reuters
• Well thought out chemical representation
• Continuous development, improvements in the pipeline
August 2010, ACS National meeting, Boston
Acknowledgements
• Development team: Nóra Máté, Róbert Wágner, Szilárd Dóránt, Tamás Csizmazia, Tim Dudgeon, Erika Bíró, Ali Baharev, Ferenc Csizmadia, et al.
• Tim Miller, Steve Hajkowski, Gez Cross and Linda Clark at Thomson Reuters for useful discussions, help and example Markush DARC files
• Many early adopters and colleagues within the field for suggestions and feedback