Post on 11-Feb-2016
description
transcript
1
Bc lifetime measurement using BcJ/ e X channel
(Preblessing / cdfnote 7758)
Masato Aoki, Shinhong KimUniversity of Tsukuba
Ilsung Cho, Intae Yu SungKyunKwan University
Ting MiaoFNAL
2
Introduction• We had measured the cross section of Bc in J/+e X
channel (note7518)– Electron ID using SoftElectronModule, dE/dx– Lxy>3sigma to kill prompt background– Background :
• Fake electron : estimate fake rate, J/+track as a control sample• Residual conversion : estimate conversion finding efficiency using
B0J/0, 0 or ee MC. Use J/+tagged conversion• b-bbar : use Pythia MC, B+J/K+ is used for the normalization• Fake J/J/ mass sideband subtraction
• We release the lifetime cut and measure the Bc lifetime– New background from prompt events
3
J/+e selection cuts
4
Summary of x-section measurement
M(J/+e) 3-4GeV 4-6GeV 3-12GeV
Fake e 16.200.322.77 15.430.312.52 34.380.475.72
Conversion 42.916.6820.89 14.544.386.39 63.178.3729.85
b-bbar 10.501.233.61 33.632.2011.17 55.922.8418.68
high mass excess 1.78 3.56 16.01
Total bkg 69.616.8321.45 63.594.9113.59 153.478.8539.10
DATA 96.0010.61 178.5014.67 313.0019.39
EXCESS 26.3912.6221.45 114.9115.4813.59 159.5321.3339.10
*Prompt BKG is killed by lifetime cut (Lxy>3sigma)
5
Overview of lifetime measurement procedure
• Same cuts as Bc x-section measurement (note7518)• Same technique for background fraction estimation• Background lifetime shapes from fitting background samples• Follow B+ lifetime measurement(CDF6266) for techniques• Single Gaussian as resolution function• Systematic error includes study of alternative resolution
function and Punzi effect• K-factor estimation similar to that of BDl but with binning of
M(J/+e)
6
Summary after releasing lifetime cut
Excess contains prompt BKG and Bc signal
7
Background fraction
• Background fraction (the denominator includes prompt bkg and Bc signal) – fake e : 0.141 +/- 0.022 – res. conv : 0.086 +/- 0.041 – bbbar : 0.080 +/- 0.022 – fake J/ : 0.209 +/- 0.012
• Statistical and systematic errors are included• Constrain the fractions for the final fitting using
Gaussian
8
K-factor
1 20 1 20
1 20 1 20
9
Additional cuts for the lifetime analysis
• Check Lxy distribution– B+J/K+
– J/+electron
• Use Lxy<70m
10
Fitter check using B+J/K+
• Simply check our fitter using B+J/K+
• Result– c=504.1 9.3m
• Agree with blessed result from CDF
11
Overview of background shape determination
• Fake electron : – J/+track with electron fake rates
• Fake J/ : – Sideband in J/+track candidates
• Residual conversion : – J/+tagged conv. electron with conversion finding efficiency
• b-bbar : – Pythia MC but with change of GS/FE/FC for systematic error
• Prompt : – Assume to be resolution function
12
Fake electron • PDF for fake
electron BKG
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct-(-ct*)Exp(λf
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(ct*)Exp(-λf
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(ct*)Exp(-λf
)s|)G(ct*f-f-f-(1F
-
-e fake
NJ/ fakeJ/ reale fakeJ/ realJ/ real ])Ff-(1F[f)G(fL
can be expected from J/ mass distribution: fake rateN : normalization factor
* Use same error scaling factor for both real J/ and fake J/ here
13
fake J/ parameterization
• PDF for fake J/
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(-ct*)Exp(λf
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(ct*)Exp(-λf)s|G(ct*)
λ*ct(ct*)Exp(-
λf
)s|)G(ct*f-f-f-(1F -
14
Fit results of fake electron & fake J/
table next page
15
Fit results of fake electron & fake J/
: m
16
Issue on fake J/ shape
• J/+track, conversion sample have fake J/ component as well as J/+electron
• Looking at fake J/+track, conversion, electron events, we found their shapes are similarsee next page
• Use common fake J/ shape• Use J/+track sample for every fake J/ shapes
– Limited stat. for conversion, electron samples
17
J/sideband event comparison
similar shapes
J/+track
J/+electron J/+conv.-e
18
Residual conversion
• PDF for residual conversion BKG
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(ct*)Exp(-λf)s|)G(ct*f-(1Fconv.
NJ/ fakeJ/ reale fakeJ/ realJ/ realconst param ])Ff-(1F[f)G(fLL
params of #
constrain param err)mean,|G(paramLConstrain fake J/ and scale factor
19
Fit result of conversion BKG
Constrained using J/+track sample : m
20
b-bbar background• PDF for b-bbar BKG
• Background events passing selection cut from each production process
1. Gluon splitting : 70%2. Flavor excitation : 25%3. Flavor creation : 5%
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(-ct*)Exp(λ
f-1
)s|G(ct*)λ
*ct(ct*)Exp(-λfF bb
Syst. study : GS and FE
(scaling factor is not constrained)
21
Fit result of b-bbar BKG
: m
22
Prompt background
• It is difficult to estimate the size of prompt background from either MC or data Float prompt BKG fraction for the final fitting
• We use resolution function as prompt background shape (Gaussian)
23
Likelihood definition for the signal fitting
• PDF for signal
• Likelihood )]s|G(ct*)
cτ*Kct(ct*)Exp([
cτKH(K)dK Fsig
))G(f)G(f)G(fG(fL bbJ/ fakeconv. res.e fakeconstrain bkg
error) mean,|G(paramL BKGconstrainparameter
sigpromptJ/ fakebbconv.e fakelifetime )Ff-f-f-f-f-[(1L
]FfFfFfFfFf promptpromptJ/ψ fakeJ/ψ fakebbbbconv.conv.e fakee fake
lifetimeconstrain paramconstrain bkg LLLL
24
Signal fitting
c(Bc)=142.6 +22.2/-19.9 m
25
signal fitting (cont’d)
26
Systematic uncertainties
• K-factor– M(Bc), pT(Bc),lifetime(Bc),decay channel,…
• Background shapes– fake J/ shapes, w/o efficiency weighting,…
• Resolution function (follow CDF6266)– Choice to treat Punzi effect as systematic error for now– Double Gaussians, Gaussian+symmetric exponential– Silicon alignment borrow the result of B lifetime analysis
using J/+X exclusive mode
27
Systematics from K-factor
• M(Bc) 6.291, 6.251 GeV 142.4, 142.6 m c : 0.2 m
• (Bc) 0.4, 0.7 ps 142.3, 142.4 m c : 0.3 m
• HbJ/X spectrum 141.3 m c : 1.3 m
• Trigger simulation 142.8 m c : 0.2 m
• Inclusive BcJ/Xe channel (K factor next page)
142.1 m c : 0.5 m
28
K-factor for inclusive Bc decays
29
Systematics from background shapes
• Fake J/ : Use J/+e sideband137.5 m c : -5.1 m
• Res. conv. : Use J/+conv sideband145.1 m c : +2.5 m
• b-bbar : No error scaling in MC fitting
140.8 m c : - 1.8 m
s f + + -
1.0 fixed 0.916 +0.014/-0.015 172 +7/-6 61 +11/-9
30
fake rate / finding efficiency weighting
Fake e : 141.2 m c : -1.4 m Conv. : 141.7 m c : -0.9 m
J/+track J/+conv.-e
31
b-bbar : 100% FE, 100% GS
s f + + -FE 1.55 +0.17/-0.16 0.992 +0.005/-0.016 133 +10/-9 262 +607/-153GS 1.27 +0.24/-0.23 0.943 +0.018/-0.021 178 +9/-8 70 +23/-15
•100% FE 152.4 m : c = +9.8 m•100% GS 140.6 m : c = -2.0 m
: m
32
Different resolution functions• Single Gaussian
• Double Gaussians
• Gaussian + symmetric exponential
Convolute
)]σs
ctExp(σs
1θ(-ct))σs
ctExp(-σs
1(ct)[ 21f
)s |)G(ct f-(1 RF
expexpexpexpexp
exp
)s|G(ctf)s |)G(ct f-(1 RF 222
)s |G(ct RF
33
J/+track fit result for Gaussian+Symmetric Exp.
c(Bc)=136.5 m c : -6.1 m
34
J/+track fit result for Double Gaussians
c(Bc)=136.2 m c : -6.4 m
35
ct error distributions for Punzi effect
c(Bc)=138.0 m c : -4.6 m
36
Systematics from ct resolution
• Resolution function c : -6.4 m
• Punzi effect (ct of fake J/, fake e, conv, others)
c : -4.6 m• Silicon alignment effect from note7409
c : 1.0 m
37
Summary of systematic errorsCategory Description c (mm)
K-factor Bc mass 0.2
K-factor Bc lifetime 0.3
K-factor HbJ/X spectrum 1.3
K-factor Inclusive J/Xe 0.5
K-factor trigger simulation 0.2
Fake e No fake rate weighting -1.4
Fake J/ Use J/+e sideband -5.1
Res. conv. No finding efficiency weighting -0.9
Res. conv. Use J/+conv-e sideband +2.5
b-bbar Use FE only, GS only +9.8, -2.0
b-bbar No error scaling in MC fitting -1.8
Resolution Resolution function -6.8
Resolution Punzi effect -4.6
Resolution Silicon alignment 1 Total:+10.3/-10.0 m
1.5 m
+10.1 / -6.0 m
+1.0 / -7.9 m
K factor
BKG shapes
Resolution
38
Summary
• We measured the Bc lifetime using J/+electron– c(Bc)=142.6 +22.2/-19.9(stat.) 10.3(syst.) m
or– (Bc)=0.475 +0.074/-0.066(stat.) 0.034(syst.) ps
• Details are described in note7758•Theoretical prediction
•0.55 0.15 ps•Run1 CDF
•0.46 +0.18/-0.16 0.03 ps•Run2 D0
•0.448 +0.123/-0.096 0.121 ps
39
Backup
40
fake J/ with 2 negative exponentials
• Why fake J/ fit quality is so bad?complicated shape at ct<0 of fake J/ event
makes bad fit qualitytry to add one more negative exponential
– see next pageresult of Bc fitting: c(Bc) = 142.1 mthe effect of the negative side is –0.5 m
41
fake J/ with different parameterization
w/ one negative exponential w/ two negative exponentials
42
b-bbar : FE only fixing s=1.25
s f + + -FE 1.25 fixed 0.958 +0.032/-0.043 139 +11/-10 87 +150/-36FE 1.55 +0.17/-0.16 0.992 +0.005/-0.016 133 +10/-9 262 +607/-153GS 1.27 +0.24/-0.23 0.943 +0.018/-0.021 178 +9/-8 70 +23/-15
43
For the lifetime measurement• Same cuts as Bc x-section measurement (note7518)• Mass window : M(J/+e)=4 ~ 6GeV/c2
• Background – fake electron : use J/+track– fake J/ : use fake J/+track– residual conversion : use J/+tagged conv.– b-bbar : Pythia MC– prompt : resolution function (Gaussian)
• Use common fake J/ shape for J/+track, J/+conv., J/+electron samples
• Constrain background shapes using Gaussian• K-factor
Divide by 4 mass bins (4-4.5, 4.5-5, 5-5.5, 5.5-6 GeV/c2)
44
45
Gaus+Gaus && Punzi effect
• Resolution function is fixed using B+ events– RF parameters from B+J/K+ fitting
• s=1.271 +0.018/-0.017• fs2=0.10 +0.016/-0.014• s2=3.07 +0.18/-0.17
• J/+e fit result with new RF && Punzi term– c(Bc) = 131.4 +21.5/-19.2 m
c(Bc) = -11.2 m
46
Gaus+Sym. Exp && Punzi effect
• Resolution function is fixed using B+ events– RF parameters from B+J/K+ fitting
• s=1.284 +0.015/-0.015• fexp=0.21 +0.03/-0.03
• sexp=1.70 +0.13/-0.11
• J/+e fit result with new RF && Punzi term– c(Bc) = 134.4 +21.8/-19.4 m
c(Bc) = -8.2 m