Bachelor Thesis - HFIA · Bachelor Thesis German Title: „Untersuchung eines 'ray tracing'...

Post on 02-Sep-2018

224 views 2 download

transcript

Bachelor Thesis

German Title: „Untersuchung eines 'ray tracing' Programms auf seine Eignung für die Kurzwellenfunk-Ausbreitungsprognose“

Structure of Presentation

• Task of the Thesis

• Proceeding

• Summary of relevant results

• Discussion

2

Task of the Thesis

In German:

„Detaillierte Untersuchungen des 'ray tracing' Programms 'Proplab-Pro 3.0' auf seine Eignung für die professionelle Kurzwellenfunk- Ausbreitungsprognose“

In English:

“Detailed Examination of the ray tracing Software 'Proplab-Pro 3.0' on its suitability for the professional forecast of HF-radio propagation”

3

Proceeding

• Study of ionospheric HF-propagation basics

• Manual calculation of a representative HF-link

• Study of "Ray Tracing" basics

• Comparison of three propagation simulation SW "PropWiz", "RPPUE" and "Proplab-Pro 3.0" w.r.t.

• Features

• "Truth" of results

4

Basics

of

Ionospheric HF-Propagation

5

Basics of Ionospheric HF-Propagation

HF propagation modes:

• Groundwave

• Skywave

6

Basics of Ionospheric HF-Propagation

Skywave propagation paths:

7

Basics of Ionospheric HF-Propagation

HF skywave propagation via ionosphere depends on the following factors:

• Time of day

• Season

• Geographic location

• Solar activity

• Frequency

• Antenna elevation radiation angle, corresponding with angle of incidence of the wave into the ionospheric layer

8

Basics of Ionospheric HF-Propagation

Ionospheric layers:

•F-layer (subdivided in F2- and F1-layer)

•E-layer

•D-layer

9

Manual Calculation of a representative HF-Link

10

Manual Calculation of a representative HF-Link

Calculation of the usable frequency range for two exemplary paths:

1st path: Munich – Hamburg

2nd path: Munich – Hong Kong

Both paths were calculated for the points in time

July 2012 and

January 2013

11

Manual Calculation of a representative HF-Link

Path Munich – Hamburg:

12

Manual Calculation of a representative HF-Link

Path Munich – Hamburg:

13

"Ray Tracing" Basics

14

"Ray Tracing" Basics

Basically the term "ray tracing" in English language is self explanatory.

Somewhat more in detail it means:

• Emitted electromagnetic waves are described by "ray tracing" using idividual rays

• The course of the rays is simulated obeying physical laws, angle of emission, diffraction and absorption

• In this way the various incident points of the wave at the ionosphere and at ground are found

15

"Ray Tracing" Basics

In the "Proplab-Pro 3.0" software the "ray tracing" model

• calculates how the signals penetrate the ionosphere and propagate in it. Penetration and diffraction are the keywords

• traces each ray individually using a dynamic, very complex model of the ionosphere

• allows for the actually existing ionospheric conditions

16

"Ray Tracing" Basics Characteristics of the "ray tracing" models in "Proplab-Pro 3.0":

2D-Model 3D-Model

Computing time Fast Suitable for real time analysis

Boring slowly Calc. time: Days to weeks

Accuracy High Very high

Including … Oblique ground reflections - -

Absorptions by the ionosphere

- Oblique ionosphere layers

Magnetic field effects Absorptions by the ionosphere

Graphic result diagram shows ...

Elevation Frequency

-

Elevation Frequency Azimuth

17

Comparison of three Propagation Simulation SW

"PropWiz", "RPPUE" and "Proplab-Pro 3.0"

as well as

Manual Calculation

18

Overview of "Proplab-Pro 3.0", "PropWiz 1.7" and "RPPUE

4.28" Proplab-Pro PropWiz RPPUE

Full

Name

Proplab-Pro Propagation

Wizard

RPPUE, Program for

calculation of HF

Radio Propagation

Predictions

Supplier Solar Terrestrial

Dispatch

Rohde & Schwarz Dr. Thomas Damboldt

Telecommunications

Version Version 3.0 Version 1.7 Version 4.28

19

Features of "Proplab-Pro 3.0"

20

Features of "Proplab-Pro 3.0"

21

Analysis of Results

Comparisons between:

1. Basic Data

2. MUF resp. FOT

3. SNR

4. Fieldstrength resp. signal strength at Rx site

5. Availability resp. reliability of commline

22

Analysis of Results

1. Basic Data e.g.

– Site Coordinates

– Distance

– Azimuth of Tx- resp. Rx- antennas

– Minimum number of required hops

Result:

No relevant differences between examined programs

23

Analysis of Results

2. MUF resp. FOT comparisons shown for the 2nd exemplary path Munich - Hong Kong in July 2012

Result: RPPUE results show very good coincidence with manual

calculation PropWiz calculates more pessimistic (i.e. lower) MUF-

values (deviations up to 3.7 MHz) Proplab-Pro 3.0 shows clear differences (deviations 2,5

MHz to 6.9 MHz) → MUF determination by "ray tracing" → more actual and precise resultats

24

MUF as calculated by PropWiz

25

MUF as calculated by RPPUE

26

MUF as calculated by Proplab

27

Analysis of Results

3. SNR-comparison shown for the 2nd exemplary path Munich - Hong Kong in July 2012

Result:

SNR available only for PropWiz und RPPUE

Course of SNR over time is identical for both programs

S/N absolute values and associated frequencies, however, exhibit major differences

→ algorithms used resp. databases are different

→ Antenna radiation patterns are evaluated with different precision

28

Analysis of Results

4. Comparison of Fieldstrength resp. Signalstrength at Rx site shown for the 2nd exemplary path Munich - Hong Kong in July 2012 Result

Available only with programs RPPUE and Proplab-Pro 3.0 Quick and easy fieldstrength determination with RPPUE Proplab-Pro 3.0: rough determination of areas having high

or low signalstrengths; bad recognition of colors and hence signalstrengths; obvious occurence of quantization errors

29

Fieldstrength as calculated by RPPUE

30

Proplab-Pro 3.0 – Settings

31

Proplab-Pro 3.0 – Broadcast Coverage Map

32

Proplab-Pro 3.0 – Zoomed Broadcast Coverage Map

33

Analysis of Results

5. Comparison of Availability resp. Reliability shown for the 2nd exemplary path Munich - Hong Kong in July

2012

Results: Available only with PropWiz und RPPUE PropWiz is determining the availabilty on the basis of the SNR RPPUE does this on a more lavish way considering technical

boundary conditions and statistical fluctuations within a month

Further Differences are to be traced back by the utilization of different databases

34

Further Analysis Tools contained in "Proplab-Pro 3.0"

„Proplab-Pro 3.0“ comes with three analysis tools :

• Ray Location Map

• Broadcast Coverage Map (already introduced in context with signal strength analysis)

• Oblique Sounder Ionogram

35

Ray Location Map

36

Ray Location Map

37

Oblique Sounder Ionogram – Settings

38

Oblique Sounder Ionogram – Elevation Angle Plot-

39

Oblique Sounder Ionogram – Elevation Angle Plot-

40

Oblique Sounder Ionogram -Propagation Delay Plot-

41

Oblique Sounder Ionogram -Propagation Delay Plot-

42

Summary of relevant Results

43

Summary of relevant Results

I. Anforderungen des Benutzers müssen ersichtlich sein

II. Programm auswählen, welches am besten zu den gestellten Ansprüchen passt

III. Vorgehen bei der Auswahl: Analysepunkte sowie Features der Programme auf ihre Wichtigkeit für den Anwender überprüfen

IV. Programm auswählen, welches die meisten Punkte und Features für den Anwender bereitstellt

44

Summary of relevant Results

Manual Calculation: The old fashioned, maybe quite accurate, method is nice for getting started and to acquire a basic understanding. Due to the immense time needed, this method nowadays has to be regarded as "pure academic". PS: In the course of our studies we found out that some old but valuable ITU (CCIR/CCITT) documentation is available only in antiquarian form

45

Summary of relevant Results

PropWiz and RPPUE: Both programs deliver quick results an are rather simple to be operated. The training period for RPPUE will be longer as compared to PropWiz but due to a more complex algorithm the results will be more precise - and ... more colorful. PS: The antenna database for both programs is of paramount importance with respect to to the meaningfulness of the results.

46

Summary of relevant Results

Proplab-Pro 3.0:

– Substantial training period required

– Many features

– Highest accuracy of all due to complex ionosphere-model and application of ray tracing method

– Quantization errors observed

– 3D-model with PCs available at that time due to extreme calculation time not applicable

47

Many Thanks for your Attention!

48

Discussion

49

Manually

Proplab-Pro

Propwiz

RPPUE