Post on 01-Apr-2015
transcript
BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIPNJASK 3-8 RESULTS
2010-2011
How are we doing compared to the standard?
% Partially Proficient
% Proficient
% Advanced Proficient
How are we compared to the District Factor Group?
Relative Performance
GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 12.8% 66.1% 21.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
6.9% 55.2% 37.9%
GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 54.2% 36.7% 9.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
43.1% 44.8% 12.1%
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 13.6% 66.4% 20.0%
Bethlehem Twp.
15.7% 65.7% 18.6%
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 46.4% 44.3% 9.3%
Bethlehem Twp.
62.9% 25.7% 11.4%
GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
SCIENCE
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 64.9% 32.0% 3.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
81.4% 18.6% 0%
GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 12.3% 67.9% 19.8%
Bethlehem Twp.
15.0% 57.5% 27.5%
GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 56.8% 35.1% 8.1%
Bethlehem Twp.
46.3% 36.3% 17.5%
GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially
Proficient
DFGI 13.4% 69.2% 17.5%
Bethlehem Twp.
18.2% 70.5% 11.4%
GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2010
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 41.9% 47.9% 10.2%
Bethlehem Twp.
52.3% 40.9% 6.8%
GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 22.7% 59.6% 17.7%
Bethlehem Twp.
25.7% 58.1% 16.2%
GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 38.9% 43.7% 17.4%
Bethlehem Twp.
33.8% 45.9% 20.3%
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
LANGUAGE ARTS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 34.1% 59.7% 6.2%
Bethlehem Twp.
41.4% 55.7% 2.9%
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
MATHEMATICS
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 46.9% 39.5% 13.7%
Bethlehem Twp.
71.4% 20.0% 8.6%
GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011
SCIENCE
Advanced Proficient Proficient
Partially Proficient
DFGI 46.8% 46.6% 6.6%
Bethlehem Twp.
58.6% 38.6% 2.9%
Data Analysis
What trends do you find in the data?
Cohort Analysis: Follow the same group of students from Grade 3-8
3-8 Cohort Analysis: Language Arts
3-8 Cohort Analysis: Mathematics
How are we doing compared to ourselves?
Progress
Non-Cohort Analysis: Different groups of students in a specific grade over time
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Mathematics
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Mathematics
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Science!
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Lang. Arts
7.94
50.962.7
41.2
33.3
6.8
14.8
50.3
54.2
42.9
31
18.3
11.2
47.9
46.6
33.8
42.2
10
17.3
40.8
53.4
49.2
29.3
8.911.4
37.5
52.2
53.6
36.4
8.1
17.5
35.1
36.2
56.8
46.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT
% S
tud
en
ts
DFG I and BT Comparison Non-Cohort Data Gr. 5 Math
2006 2007 2008* 2009 2010**
*ScoringChange
Adv. Prof.
Part. Prof.
Proficient
2011
**Stayed at Conley
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Mathematics
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Mathematics
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Lang. Arts
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Mathematics
Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Science