Birds, people and papyrus swamps: balancing livelihoods and

Post on 12-Sep-2021

1 views 0 download

transcript

Birds, people and papyrus swamps: balancing livelihoods

and biodiversity conservation

Ilya Maclean

i.m.d.maclean@exeter.ac.uk

Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter

Background

Birds good indicators of

ecosystem health:

• occur in wide variety of habitats

• sensitive to environmental change

• Well known and easy to monitor

Much conservation policy is

based on birds

• EU Birds Directive

• Ramsar Convention

• BirdLife International IBA

programme

Background

Wide variety of birds associated

with papyrus swamps

Most not solely reliant on

papyrus

Maclean et al. (2003) Bird Conservation International, 13: 283-97

Five species considered

endemic / near-endemic

Background

Maclean et al. (2003) Bird Conservation International, 13: 283-97

Papyrus Canary Serinus koliensis Carruthers’s Cisticola Cisticola carruthersi White-winged Swamp Warbler Bradypterus carpalis

Papyrus Yellow Warbler Chloropeta gracilirostris (VU)

Papyrus Gonolek Laniarius mufumbiri (NT)

Background

Wide variety of birds associated

with papyrus swamps

Most not solely reliant on

papyrus

Five species considered

endemic / near-endemic

Regionally, among most-

threatened and least adequately

protected

Maclean et al. (2003) Bird Conservation International, 13: 283-97

Key questions

• How threatened papyrus

birds (and why)?

• Can conservation resources

be targeted?

• Are bird-based policies

compatible with people?

Methods

• Biodiversity surveys across

Lake Victoria basin

• Analysis of satellite imagery

• Socio-economic modelling

Results: taxonomy

• Papyrus Yellow Warbler

probably three species:

• Three highly disjunct populations

• Plumage, biometrics, size, bare parts &

vocals all differ

• Species / population in

Kenya Critically

Endangered

• Confined to very small number of sites

• All sites highly threatened

Albertine Rift

Western Kenya

Lake Mweru

Maclean et al. (2003) Bulletin of the African Bird Club, 10: 94-100

Results: habitat loss

Mean percentage annual rates

of wetland loss (1984-2000)

Rice schemes

Extensive cultivation & dairy farming

Dredging & Brick-making

Maclean et al. (2011) Diversity & Distributions, 17: 480-90.

Results: bird loss

Maclean et al. (2011) Diversity & Distributions, 17: 480-90.

Rarity weighted bird density index Annual rates of wetland loss

Red = high Blue = low

0

20

40

60

White-winged

Warbler

PapyrusYellow

Warbler

Carruthers'sCisticola

PapyrusGonolek

PapyrusCanary

Perc

en

tag

e l

oss (

1985-2

000)

Mean wetland loss 1985-2000

Bird densities higher in

areas of high drainage

Bird declines >> wetland

loss

Results: avian responses to

disturbance

Maclean et al. (2011) Diversity & Distributions, 17: 480-90.

A small proportion of wetlands host a high proportion of the birds:

c. 75% of birds hosted by c. 5% of wetlands

Results: avian responses to

disturbance

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Proportion of swamp disturbed

De

ns

ity

Papyrus Yellow Warbler

Papyrus Canary

Carruthers's Cisticola

White-winged Warbler

Papyrus Gonolek

Principal component of vegetation structure indicative of disturbance

High disturbance

Bird densities

highest in swamps

with low-intensity

disturbance

Maclean et al. (2006) Biological Conservation, 131: 349-58.

Conclusions: birds

Birds adversely affecting by

habitat loss

Birds not adversely affected by

low-intensity disturbance

• Long history of disturbance + extinction

filter?

• Mimics of disturbance of evolutionary

time scales – e.g. large herbivores?

Possible to target conservation

resources efficiently

Results: value to people

• Drainage lowers value

• Value maximised with low-intensity use

• If people are poorer, optimum value changes

Maclean et al. (2003) CSERGE ECM 03-10

Results: value to people

Maclean et al. (2003) CSERGE ECM 03-09

Everyone has equal income

One person has all income

Poorest people use wetlands the most

Conclusions: people

Papyrus used

unsustainably

Poverty & income

inequity increase

Two equilibria:

(1) Sustainable resource use, moderate poverty &

income inequity

(2) Unsustainable resource use, high poverty &

income inequity

As human population increases, switch from

state (1) to (2) increasingly likely

Maclean et al. (2011) Environmental Management, 47: 218-29.

Conclusions: general

Win-win for birds and people depends

on poverty reduction

The way forward

1. Recognise that low-intensity

resource use is compatible with

conservation

2. Poverty-reduction should be

pivotal to conservation policy

3. Seek to diversify income

sources as this will break circle

of poverty

Acknowledgements Fieldwork assistance:

Jez Bird, Mark Hassall, Steven Katungi, Simon Mahood, Rob Martin, Rowan

Martin, Richard Moores, Nicodemus Nalianya, Oliver Nasirwa, Johnson

Ruhakana, Johnson Tumahairwe

Logistic support / advice:

Leon Bennun, Achillis Byaruhanga, Nigel Collar, Lincoln Fishpool, Janet

Havers, Alfred Owino, Derek Pomeroy, Charlie Williams

Academic Collaboration:

Ros Boar, Mark Hassall, Iain Lake, Charles Lugo, Nicodemus Nalianya, Oliver

Nasirwa, Rob Tinch, Rob Wilson

Funders:

University of East Anglia, British Ecological Society, Royal Geographic

Society, African Bird Club, British Airways