Post on 21-Jan-2016
description
transcript
By-Plant Prediction of Corn (By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea Zea mays mays L.) Grain Yield Using Optical L.) Grain Yield Using Optical
Sensor Readings and Measured Sensor Readings and Measured Plant HeightPlant Height
By-Plant Prediction of Corn (By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea Zea mays mays L.) Grain Yield Using Optical L.) Grain Yield Using Optical
Sensor Readings and Measured Sensor Readings and Measured Plant HeightPlant Height
K.L. Martin, W.R. Raun, M.L. Stone, J.B. Solie, K.W. K.L. Martin, W.R. Raun, M.L. Stone, J.B. Solie, K.W. Freeman, B. Tubana, B. Chung, R.K. Teal, D.B. Arnall, K. Freeman, B. Tubana, B. Chung, R.K. Teal, D.B. Arnall, K. Desta, S. Moges, C.J. Mack, J.W. Lawless, O. Walsh, S. Desta, S. Moges, C.J. Mack, J.W. Lawless, O. Walsh, S.
Holtz, K. Lawless Holtz, K. Lawless
K.L. Martin, W.R. Raun, M.L. Stone, J.B. Solie, K.W. K.L. Martin, W.R. Raun, M.L. Stone, J.B. Solie, K.W. Freeman, B. Tubana, B. Chung, R.K. Teal, D.B. Arnall, K. Freeman, B. Tubana, B. Chung, R.K. Teal, D.B. Arnall, K. Desta, S. Moges, C.J. Mack, J.W. Lawless, O. Walsh, S. Desta, S. Moges, C.J. Mack, J.W. Lawless, O. Walsh, S.
Holtz, K. Lawless Holtz, K. Lawless
By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain YieldYield
By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain YieldYield
This bicycle was modified This bicycle was modified such that a such that a GreenSeeker™ sensor GreenSeeker™ sensor head, power source, and head, power source, and shaft encoder could be shaft encoder could be used to determine used to determine distance for each NDVI distance for each NDVI reading recorded in the reading recorded in the data file.data file.
This bicycle was modified This bicycle was modified such that a such that a GreenSeeker™ sensor GreenSeeker™ sensor head, power source, and head, power source, and shaft encoder could be shaft encoder could be used to determine used to determine distance for each NDVI distance for each NDVI reading recorded in the reading recorded in the data file.data file.
Measure the distance of Measure the distance of each each plant’s locationplant’s location
Calculate the area that Calculate the area that each plant occupieseach plant occupies
Where:Where:DiDi is the area occupied is the area occupied by the iby the ithth plantplantdi-1,di,di+1di-1,di,di+1 are the are the distances to distances to the i-1, i, the i-1, i, and i+1 plantsand i+1 plants
Average NDVI of each plantAverage NDVI of each plant
Measure the distance of Measure the distance of each each plant’s locationplant’s location
Calculate the area that Calculate the area that each plant occupieseach plant occupies
Where:Where:DiDi is the area occupied is the area occupied by the iby the ithth plantplantdi-1,di,di+1di-1,di,di+1 are the are the distances to distances to the i-1, i, the i-1, i, and i+1 plantsand i+1 plants
Average NDVI of each plantAverage NDVI of each plant
2211 iiii
i
ddddD
2211 iiii
i
ddddD
The unit was pushed The unit was pushed along the corn row as along the corn row as illustratedillustrated
White marker plates were White marker plates were used at the beginning used at the beginning and end of each row to and end of each row to designate the start and designate the start and stop pointstop point
The resulting data file The resulting data file included NDVI for each included NDVI for each calibrated distance calibrated distance (approximately 1.1 cm) (approximately 1.1 cm) and sonar height (when and sonar height (when sonar was used)sonar was used)
The unit was pushed The unit was pushed along the corn row as along the corn row as illustratedillustrated
White marker plates were White marker plates were used at the beginning used at the beginning and end of each row to and end of each row to designate the start and designate the start and stop pointstop point
The resulting data file The resulting data file included NDVI for each included NDVI for each calibrated distance calibrated distance (approximately 1.1 cm) (approximately 1.1 cm) and sonar height (when and sonar height (when sonar was used)sonar was used)
Data PresentationData PresentationData PresentationData Presentation
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Distance (cm)
ND
VI (R
aw)
Pass #1 Pass #2 Plant
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Distance (cm)
ND
VI (P
lant
Ave
rage
)
Individual data points collected every 1.1 cmIndividual data points collected every 1.1 cm
Average NDVI for each plantAverage NDVI for each plant
NDVI vs. Grain Yield at all sites NDVI vs. Grain Yield at all sites (2003 and 2004)(2003 and 2004)NDVI vs. Grain Yield at all sites NDVI vs. Grain Yield at all sites (2003 and 2004)(2003 and 2004)
Grain Yield = 2021.5e91.918 * INSEY
R2 = 0.29
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02INSEY
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg
ha
-1)
EFAW , OK (2003)
LCB, OK (2003)
EFAW , OK (2004)
Shelton, NE (2004)
Ames, IA (2004)
LCB, OK (2004)
Hennessey, OK (2004)
INSEY vs. Grain Yield at all sites INSEY vs. Grain Yield at all sites where height was recordedwhere height was recordedINSEY vs. Grain Yield at all sites INSEY vs. Grain Yield at all sites where height was recordedwhere height was recorded
Grain Yield = 2193.6e82.918 * INSEY
R2 = 0.27
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02INSEY
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg
ha
-1)
EFAW , OK (2004)
LCB, OK (2004)
Hennessey, OK (2004)
Do these plants compete with one another?
If they do, what above ground parameter(s) can we use to evaluate this?
Does the proximity of the competitor have an impact on the level of competition?
Do these plants compete with one another?
If they do, what above ground parameter(s) can we use to evaluate this?
Does the proximity of the competitor have an impact on the level of competition?
1 2 3 4 5
Plant Competition EquationPlant Competition EquationPlant Competition EquationPlant Competition Equation
pq-2 pq-1 pq Pq+1 Pq+2
2/)( 2
1
pqpq
pq
HtHt
Ht
2/)( 2
1
pqpq
pq
HtHt
Ht
2/
2/)(2/)( 2
1
2
1
pqpq
pq
pqpq
pq
pq
HtHt
Ht
HtHt
Ht
Ht
Cadj of the Plant in Question
In a series of five plants, the height of plant number 2 and 4 is compared to the average of the height of their neighbors to assess the competitive ability of plants 2 and 4 as compared to the plant in question, plant 3. This value generated from the first step of this process (weighted average value of plant 2 and 4 in the series) is then compared to the actual height of plant 3 to result in a weighted comparison of the competitive ability of plant 3 to its neighbors
In a series of five plants, the height of plant number 2 and 4 is compared to the average of the height of their neighbors to assess the competitive ability of plants 2 and 4 as compared to the plant in question, plant 3. This value generated from the first step of this process (weighted average value of plant 2 and 4 in the series) is then compared to the actual height of plant 3 to result in a weighted comparison of the competitive ability of plant 3 to its neighbors
INSEYC D
adj estGY GYest is the estimated grain yield Cadj is the competition adjustment
factor D is the linear distance occupied by
each plant INSEY is the in-season estimate of
yield
GYest is the estimated grain yield Cadj is the competition adjustment
factor D is the linear distance occupied by
each plant INSEY is the in-season estimate of
yield
The competition adjustment factor accounts for the competitive ability of the plant in question when considering its height against those that surround it. This value is then divided by the linear distance to adjust the index due to the change in proximity of the competitive plants (a closer proximity to the competitive plant will divide by a smaller number resulting in more emphasis being placed on the height comparison). The resulting value is then multiplied by INSEY to allow for an incorporation of biomass produced per day.
The competition adjustment factor accounts for the competitive ability of the plant in question when considering its height against those that surround it. This value is then divided by the linear distance to adjust the index due to the change in proximity of the competitive plants (a closer proximity to the competitive plant will divide by a smaller number resulting in more emphasis being placed on the height comparison). The resulting value is then multiplied by INSEY to allow for an incorporation of biomass produced per day.
By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain YieldYield
By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain YieldYield
Yield Prediction Using INSEYYield Prediction Using INSEY
Yield Prediction Using GYest
Yield Prediction Using GYest
Grain Yield = 538596*INSEY+939.9
R2 = 0.16
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025INSEY
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg
ha-1
)
EFAW, OK (2004)
LCB, OK (2004)
Hennessey, OK (2004)
EFAW, OK (2005)
LCB, OK (2005)
Grain Yield = 15661 * GYest + 3367.2R2 =0.48
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8GYest
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg
ha-1
)
EFAW, OK (2004)
LCB, OK (2004)
Hennessey, OK (2004)
EFAW, OK (2005)
LCB, OK (2005)
Questions??Questions??