California Off-road Mobile Source Technology Review JOHN DEERE LE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY

Post on 30-Dec-2015

38 views 4 download

Tags:

description

California Off-road Mobile Source Technology Review JOHN DEERE LE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY. John Deere Consumer Products February 2, 2000. Handheld Products. Emissions Performance. *. * Certification value for Deere 125-hour engine. Certification. Certified for durability period of 125 hours - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

California Off-road Mobile Source Technology Review

JOHN DEERE LE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY

John Deere Consumer Products

February 2, 2000

2 Feb 2000 2

Handheld Products

2 Feb 2000 3

Emissions Performance

HC + NOx (Class IV)

45.654

185

0

50

100

150

200

250

EPA 1 CARB 2 LE Engine

g/hp-hr

*

* Certification value for Deere 125-hour engine

2 Feb 2000 4

Certification

• Certified for durability period of 125 hours• Required same level of maintenance as current

25 cc engine– No catalyst to replace– No valve train, so no need for lash

adjustment• Power was constant at .95 hp • DF of 1.1

• Low NOx of less than 2 g/hp-hr

• Fuel efficient with low CO2

2 Feb 2000 5

Fuel Consumption

Fuel Consumption Reduction

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Prototype 70.7 cc Professional Saw Prototype 25 cc Trimmer Engine

Perc

ent o

f sta

ndar

d

0.419 kg/kW-h0.687 lb/hp-h

0.497 kg/kW-h0.815 lb/hp-h

2 Feb 2000 6

Component Comparison Between JDCP & Standard Two stroke

– Injector

– Injection Tube

Standard JDCP LE Engine

LE Technology

2 Feb 2000 7

JDCP 25 cc Engine

Standard 25 cc Engine Prototype LE 25 cc Engine

2 Feb 2000 8

Fuel & air is drawn into crankcase Only Air is drawn into crankcase

Low Emission Engine Technology

2 Feb 2000 9

Crankcase is filled with air/fuel Crankcase is filled with air while

mixture injection tube draws fuel

Low Emission Engine Technology

2 Feb 2000 10

Air/fuel mixture compressed in Air is compressed in crankcase crankcase and fuel is compressed in

injection tube

Low Emission Engine Technology

2 Feb 2000 11

Air/fuel mixture is forced through Only air is forced through transfer transfer ports into combustion ports into combustion chamber chamber. Expansion gases compress fuel

in injection tube.

Low Emission Engine Technology

2 Feb 2000 12

Air/fuel mixture escapes through Fuel injection starts. Only air

exhaust port through exhaust

Low Emission Engine Technology

2 Feb 2000 13

Lubrication

• Introduces small portion of fuel/oil mixture into the crankcase

• Operates in high viscosity oil mist environment versus standard flooded condition

• No bearing failures or evidence of poor lubrication

2 Feb 2000 14

Fuel Delivery System

• Current fuel systems are based on the standard carburetor and address all operating modes of the engine

2 Feb 2000 15

Fuel System

Vacuum Fuel System for Compressed Air Assisted Injection System

2 Feb 2000 16

Power

• LE prototypes of same displacement (25 cc) engines have demonstrated equivalent and improved power – 25 cc LE engine produces almost 1 horsepower

• Power can be tailored using conventional engine design criteria– Port timing and size– Fuel system venturi/throttle bore size

2 Feb 2000 17

Weight

• Additional weight is insignificant• LE parts adds about 40 grams (less than 2

ounces)

2 Feb 2000 18

Ambient Temperature Operation

• LE engine provides same operating performance as current carbureted engines across wide range of ambient temperatures

2 Feb 2000 19

Engine Temperatures

• No “new” heat management issues are presented with the LE Technology

• Good initial designs for heat management, as with typical commercial engines, will have fewer or no heat problems

• Engineering solutions are readily available• LE engine certified at 125 hours of operation,

demonstrating no heat problems

2 Feb 2000 20

Manufacturability

Requires only• Minimal cylinder modification • New fuel delivery system, which will be

commercially available• Miscellaneous hardware

LOW COST SOLUTION

2 Feb 2000 21

Advantages

• Lower cost

• Lower fuel consumption

• Comparable performance to other direct injected two stroke technologies

• Lower NOx, CO & CO2 than 4 stroke technology

• Adaptable to larger displacement engines