California's Active Transportation Program: Coalition Building to Boost Funding for Walking & Biking

Post on 06-Jul-2015

45 views 0 download

Tags:

description

California's Active Transportation Program: Coalition Building to Boost Funding Learn how the ad-hoc Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership won a 35% boost in active transportation funding in California. Coalition members from California Walks, the Safe Routes to School National Partnership and the California Bicycle Coalition will highlight how member organizations came together, underscore keys to the successful campaign, and share lessons learned for other states looking to follow California's lead. Presenters: Presenter: Tony Dang California Walks Co-Presenter: Dave Snyder California Bicycle Coalition Co-Presenter: Jeanie Ward-Waller Safe Routes to School National Partnership

transcript

California's Active Transportation Program:

Coalition Building to Boost Funding for Walking & Biking

September 11, 2014 Pro Walk/Pro Bike/Pro Place Conference

Pittsburgh, PA

Overview

> $1B

$368M

o Background & Timeline on

California’s Active Transportation

Program (ATP)

o The Bike, Walk, & SRTS Perspectives

on ATP Cycle 1 o Lessons Learned from Coalition Work

o Questions?

MAP-21 Consolidation

> $1B

$368M Transportation

Alternatives

Program (TAP)

Safe Routes to

School (SRTS)

Transportation

Enhancements

(TE)

Recreational

Trails Program

(RTP)

Decrease in Federal $

> $1B

$368M

> $1B

$368M

$0#

$20#

$40#

$60#

$80#

$100#

$120#

Pre,TAP# TAP#

($ in Millions)

TAP

TE

SRTS

RTP

~30%

Decrease

Coordinated State Advocacy Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership

(CATL)

Coordinated State Advocacy W A L K S A N F R A N C I S C O

...AND MANY MANY MORE!

Timeline—2012

Aug

• Coalition Formed • MAP-21 Recommendations:

133 orgs signed on

Timeline—2012

Aug

• Coalition Formed • MAP-21 Recommendations:

133 orgs signed on

Nov

• Gov. Proposes Active Transportation

Program (ATP) Concept • Originated from Dept. of Finance; Cut

walking/biking staffing • United front in asks: level funding;

maintain existing priorities (SRTS, RTP);

adequate staffing

ATP Proposal

> $1B

$368M

Active

Transportation

Program (ATP)

State Safe

Routes to

School (SR2S)

Transportation

Alternatives

Program (TAP)

State

Environmental

Enhancement

Mitigation

Program (EEMP)

State Bicycle

Transportation

Account (BTA)

Timeline—2013

Jan

• Joint Statewide Petition: 159 orgs;

~7K individuals

Timeline—2013

Jan

• Joint Statewide Petition: 159 orgs;

~7K individuals

Spring

• Prelim negotiations w/

Administration & Legislature

Timeline—2013

Jan

• Joint Statewide Petition: 159 orgs;

~7K individuals

Spring

• Prelim negotiations w/

Administration & Legislature

Summer

• Final negotiations w/

Administration

Timeline—2013

Jan

• Joint Statewide Petition: 159 orgs;

~7K individuals

Spring

• Prelim negotiations w/

Administration & Legislature

Summer

• Final negotiations w/

Administration

Sept • ATP Signed Into Law

Revised ATP Proposal

> $1B

$368M

ATP#SR2S#

TAP#EEMP#

BTA#

STP#

•  60% of RTP

retained for

motorized &

natural surface

trails

•  Administered by

State Parks & Rec

•  40% of RTP into

ATP, with State

Parks involved in

project selection

•  $7M retained for EEMP

•  Administered by State

Dept. of Nat. Resources

•  $3M into ATP

Revised ATP Proposal

> $1B

$368M

$0#

$20#

$40#

$60#

$80#

$100#

$120#

$140#

Pre,ATP# ATP#

($ in Millions)

Combined State

STP

TAP

TE*

SRTS

RTP

SR2S

BTA

*Bike/Ped Only

$96M

$129.5M ~35%

Increase

Key ATP Features

o  Incorporated explicit public health,

equity, and climate change goals

Photo Credit: Tony Dang

Key ATP Features

o Min. 25% of ALL ATP funds must

benefit disadvantaged communities

+ 5% planning target

Photo Credit: Jenny Weiss

Key ATP Features

o Min. $24M/year guarantee for SRTS

from state share (for 3 years) –  Of which, min. $7.2M/year target for non-

infrastructure –  Maintain funding for SRTS Technical Assistance

Resource Center

Photo Credit: Tony Dang Photo Credit: Santa Monica Spoke

Key ATP Features

o Non-SRTS non-infrastructure

projects eligible

Photo Credit: Tony Dang

Timeline—2014

Fall 2013 •  ATP Guidelines Development

Mar •  ATP Guidelines Adopted

May •  State Cycle 1 Call for Projects Closed

Aug

•  State Cycle 1 Projects Awarded •  Regional Cycle 1 Projects TBD

Cycle 1—Statewide, Small Urban/Rural

Demand Far Outpaces Available $

$0#

$200#

$400#

$600#

$800#

$1,000#

$1,200#

Available#Funding#

Requested#Funding#

($ in Millions)

> $1B

$221M

Demand Far Outpaces Available $

0#

100#

200#

300#

400#

500#

600#

700#

Funded#ApplicaGons#

Unfunded#ApplicaGons#624

148

~1 in 5

Applications Funded

Cycle 1—Statewide, Small Urban/Rural

Perspectives on ATP Cycle 1

> $1B

$368M

o The Bike Perspective – Dave Snyder, Executive Director

California Bicycle Coalition

o The Walk Perspective – Tony Dang, Deputy Director

California Walks

o The SRTS Perspective –  Jeanie Ward-Waller, California Advocacy Organizer

Safe Routes to School National Partnership