Post on 17-Mar-2016
description
transcript
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
1
Causes and Mitigation of Radio Frequency Blackout During
Reentry of Reusable Launch Vehicles
DOT Volpe Center Contracts DTRS57-99-D-00062, Task 10,and DTRT57-05-D-30103, Task 7
Briefing to COMSTAC RLV Working GroupMay 17, 2007
Bob SeiboldThe Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
(310) 336-1326robert.w.seibold@aero.org
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
2
Outline and Acknowledgements• Outline
• Backgroud• Approach• Electron Generation Process• Representative Vehicle Classes Analyzed
• Plasma Flow Fields• Blackout Trajectories
• Mitigation Methodologies• Conclusions
• Acknowledgements• FAA/AST Technical Lead: Pradipta Shome• Volpe Center COTR: Ann DiMare• Aerospace Principal Investigators: Dr. Richard Hartunian, Dr. Gordon Stewart• Other Aerospace Contributors: Dr. Thomas Curtiss, Dr. Stephen Fergason• Aerospace Program Manager: Bob Seibold
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
3
Scope• RF blackout is caused by high electron concentrations in plasma sheaths
covering reentering vehicles. These sheaths reflect or attenuate electromagnetic waves.– Vehicles likely to come before AST in the future, that could be affected by
blackout, will include orbital RLVs and some suborbital vehicles traveling at high speeds.
– Future RLVs could remain in attenuated communication mode during the most critical phase of flight, due to long glide phases for energy management.
– Related operation and safety challenges.• Examined causes of blackout for various vehicle classes and potential
alleviation methodologies, e.g.:– Aerodynamic shaping– Injection of electrophilic quenchants into plasma layer– Generation of local magnetic fields to create spectral windows through which
RF waves can propagate• Study bounded by the following considerations:
– Focused on direct RF transmission from vehicles to ground, without use of satellites for indirect transmission
– Evaluated both manned and unmanned space vehicles
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
4
Approach
1. Defined vehicle classes to be evaluated• Reusable vehicles for future space transportation• Other classes with published flight data relevant to problem
2. Defined ionized flow fields for each vehicle class• Published flight data used where available• Analytic predictions using best state-of-the-art codes, in absence of
published flight data3. Analyzed RF interactions with ionized flow field
• Comparisons with analytic predictions and flight data where available4. Studied mitigation methods
• Recommended promising mitigation methods for more detailed assessment
5. Reviewed frequency bands for RF transmission
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
5
Representative Vehicle Classes1. Blunted conical ballistic reentry vehicles2. Sharp-tipped slender conical ballistic reentry vehicles3. Unpowered lifting glide vehicle
• Space Shuttle concept4. Fully reusable 2-stage cargo vehicle for future commercial
space transportation5. Powered air-breathing lifting vehicle
• Blackout unlikely
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
6
Ballistic Vehicles and Fully Reusable 2-stage Cargo Vehicle
Sharp-tipped Ballistic Reentry Vehicleand Reentry Flow Characteristics
Blunt-tipped RAM C Vehicle and Reentry Flow Characteristics.
Reprinted with permission of IEEE[Rybak and Churchill, 1971]
RpK K-1 Vehicle.Reprinted with permission
of Rocketplane-Kistler
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
7
Unpowered Glide and Powered Cruise Vehicles
Drawing of Space Shuttle Orbiter During Reentry Conditions
X-43A Air-breathing Hypersonic Vehicle During Ground Testing
Reprinted courtesy of NASA
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
8
Sources of Electrons in Plasma SheathsPlasma sheath created from conversion of vehicle’s kinetic energy, compressing and heating air flow surrounding vehicle:• Temperature of air raised by:
1. Shock waves at all leading edges and some embedded structures. Conservation of energy equation for direction normal (90º) to vehicle’s
velocity vector:(CpT)atm + U2/2 = constant for normal flow across a 1-D shockwave
where: Cp = heat capacity, T = temperature, U = velocity of flow
2. Conversion of viscous stresses due to velocity gradients in flow• As air temperature increases, the following sequence occurs:
– Excitement of molecule translation, rotation, and vibration degrees of freedom
– Dissociation and ionization• Numerous complex reactions contribute to generation of electrons,
beginning with 20% O2 and 80% N2
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
9
Electron Generation Process• High reentry temperatures dissociate the oxygen and nitrogen
molecules of the air, which triggers complex chemical reactions producing ionization. – All of these reactions need to be accounted for.
• 26 example reactions are listed in a backup chart. A representative example is:O2 + N2 NO + NO+ + e-
• In an exothermic reaction, molecules collide with enough energy to overcome the activation energy barrier and form an activated complex at a lower energy level.
• The released electrons and charged molecules form the plasma sheath, inhibiting communications.– At lower altitudes, the forward and reverse rates become equal,
producing chemical equilibrium. At high altitudes, non-equilibrium chemistry prevails.
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
10
Definition of Plasma Flow FieldsA. Blunt, Slender Reentry Vehicles
– NASA Radio Attenuation Measurements (RAM) Program
Flow Regions About a Conic Shaped Vehicle at 40 km. Reprinted with permission
of IEEE [Rybak and Churchill, 1971]
Rake of Ion Probes
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
11
Definition of Plasma Flow Fields, Con’t.
RAM C-II Reentry Trajectory withOnset and End of RF Blackout at3 Frequencies. Reprinted courtesy of NASA [Grantham, W. L., NASA SP-252, 1970]
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
12
Definition of Plasma Flow Fields, Con’t.
B. Sharp, Slender Reentry Vehicles– Sharp-tipped ballistic RV with shock wave
Orange layer (thickness exaggerated) represents location of electrons generated at nose.
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
13
Electron Density Decay Along VehicleLength, Sharp-tipped RVs
RN = nose radius
Clean air peak electrondensity decay. Reprinted with permission of AIAA [Steiger et al., AIAA 70-220, 1970]
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
14
Definition of Plasma Flow Fields, Con’t.
C. Fully Reusable 2-stage Cargo Vehicle for Future Commercial Space Transportation– RpK K-1
Reprinted with permissionof Rocketplane-Kistler
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
15
RpK OV
Shuttle
Relative Velocity – km/sec
300
250
200
150
100
50
00 5 10 15 20 25 30
Relative Velocity – kft/sec
0 2 4 6 8
0
20
40
60
80
Alti
tude
– k
m
Alti
tude
– k
ft ShuttleRpK OV
VehicleBlackoutduration,minutes
161
Blackout Trajectories for Two Vehicle Classes
Onset ofblackout
RecoveryFrom blackout
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
16
Definition of Plasma Flow Fields, Con’t.
D. Space Shuttle– No direct experimental measurement of the ionized flow field on a
reentering orbiter– Only known analysis of the ionized flow field was by Dunn and Kang
in April 1973 – about 8 years before STS-1– They modeled the Orbiter as a 20º cone with a 4-ft. radius blunt cone
reentering at 20º angle of attack. Despite the fact that the nose radius on the as-built Shuttle is smaller and the entry angle of attack is actually 40º, they concluded that blackout duration would be 15 minutes, close to the actual 16 minutes experienced.
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
17
Plasma Flow Profiles for Shuttle ConfigurationElectron Number Density Distributions in Shock Layer
20º ConeBlunted Delta at 20ºξ = S/RN = ratio of downstream position to hemisphere radius
y = distance normal to body surface (abscissa)S = distance along surface of body from nosetip
Reprinted courtesy of NASA[Dunn and Kang, NASA CR-2232, April 1973]
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
18
Blackout Trajectories for Four Vehicle Classes
Sharp RV
Ram C
Shuttle
RpK OV
30
Relative Velocity – km/sec
300
250
200
150
100
50
00 5 10 15 20 25
Relative Velocity – kft/sec
0 2 4 6 8
0
20
40
60
80
Alti
tude
– k
m
Alti
tude
– k
ftOnset ofblackout
RecoveryFrom blackout
ShuttleRpK OVRam CSharp RV
VehicleBlackoutduration,minutes
161
0.50
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
19
Mitigation Methodologies
1. Aerodynamic Shaping– Sharp, slender probes/cones containing antenna protruding ahead of
shock waves– Issue: Likely to require active cooling of sharp nose region
Reprinted with permission of AIAA[Belov, et al., AIAA 99-3739]
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
20
Mitigation Methodologies, Con’t.
2. Injection of Liquids– Injection of electrophilics or other liquids that form droplets that
attach electrons and contribute to cooling ahead of antenna on LV– Successfully demonstrated on RAM C-III vehicle with Freon E3 and
water injected alternatively. Mass flow rates ranged from <0.1 to 0.45 lb/sec. Complete recovery of RF was achieved. Total mass of liquid required: 14 lbs to erase 32 sec. of blackout for this small vehicle.
– Issue: How does the required mass flow of alleviant scale up to a full-size commercial vehicle?• Unpowered lifting-glide vehicle• Powered air-breathing vehicle
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
21
Mitigation Methodologies, Con’t.
3. Application of Magnetic Field– Application of a steady magnetic field in the direction of intended RF
propagation– Theory supports concept in principle, e.g., Starkey, et al., 34th AIAA
Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conf., June 2003.– NASA experiment reported 20 db reduction with 750 Gauss field
applied to laboratory plasma– Japanese team analytical experiment reports 1,500 Gauss penetrates
plasma if magnetic field cyclotron frequency equals RF frequency (Whistler mode). Usai, et al., 6th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conf., Sept. 2000, p. 107.
– Others estimated 104 Gauss would penetrate air-breathing reentry blacked-out plasma layer
– Issue: Whereas current magnetic field strength generation technology may support up to 1,500 Gauss at acceptable weight and volume, the consensus is that achieving 104 Gauss will require advances in superconducting technologies
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
22
Other Mitigation Approaches Considered• High Power
– Breakdown– Workarounds: pulsed power, bandwidth, adaptive matching, electrophilics
• High Frequencies– Atmospheric attenuation– Incompatibility with ground stations/satellites– Frequencies compatible with Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast Mode
(ADS-B) Architecture. 500 MHz lower bound for this task.• Low Frequencies
– Antenna size– Incompatibility with ground stations/satellites– Workarounds: trailing wires?
• Lasers– Atmospheric attenuation– Not all-weather– Incompatibility with ground stations/satellites
• Indirect Communication– Transmit up to satellites– Bent pipe to ground stations
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
23
Conclusions
• Sharp-tipped RVs experience little or no blackout– Very thin sheath also facilitates other mitigation approaches, e.g.,
quenchants or magnetic fields, should they be necessary• Blunted conical and lifting-glide vehicles can experience significant
blackout• Aerodynamic shaping is most promising approach for mitigating
blackout– Investigate sharp, slender probes/cones containing antenna
protruding ahead of shock wave• Higher frequencies correlate with decreased blackout
– Atmospheric attenuation > ~10 GHz
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
24
Backup
©2007, The Aerospace Corporation, All Rights Reserved
25
ChemicalReactions andRate CoefficientsUsed inNonequilibriumCalculations
Reprinted courtesy of NASA[Dunn and Kang, NASA CR-2232, April 1973]