Changes in therapeutic strategy in metastatic castration ... · 2012 2014 12% 21% 18% 18% 87% 77%...

Post on 13-Aug-2020

2 views 0 download

transcript

2012 2014

12%

21%18% 18%

87%

77%81% 80%

NDx mHSPC Progressive mHSPC nmCRPC nmHSPC

Abiraterone acetate Docetaxel

48%

61%

72%

62%

46%

30%

21%

30%

4% 6% 4% 4%

NDx mHSPC Progressive mHSPC nmCRPC nmHSPC

Abiraterone acetate Docetaxel Enzalutamide

Legend Legend

80.9%Doce.

17.5%Abi.

Doce.30.7%

61.9%

Abi.

4.5%Enza.

1 Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France – 2 CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France – 3 Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France 4 CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France – 5 ESSEC, Cergy-Pontoise, France – 6 Janssen, Issy les Moulineaux, France

Changes in therapeutic strategy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between 2012 and 2014 from the French nationwide claims database (SNDS)

• The arrival of new therapeutic strategies has impacted mCRPC management: 8 out of 10 patientsused docetaxel as 1st line in 2012 whereas they were only 3 out of 10 in 2014, most of the remainingpatients used abiraterone acetate (Table 1)

Nicolas Thurin1,2 *, Magali Rouyer1, Jérémy Jové1, Marine Gross-Goupil2, Thibaud Haaser2, Xavier Rébillard3, Michel Soulié4, Gérard de Pouvourville5, Camille Capone6, Marie Pierrès6, Stéphanie Lamarque1, Emmanuelle Bignon1, Cécile Droz-Perroteau1, Nicholas Moore1,2, Patrick Blin1

• To describe patients characteristics according to the 1st treatment lines in 2012 and 2014• To describe treatment lines for mCRPC patients in 2012 an 2014• To assess the therapeutic strategic changes for mCRPC between 2012 and 2014

35th Annual European Association of Urology CongressMarch 20-24, 2020, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Poster#580

Declaration of interest statement: The CAMERRA study is carried out by the Bordeaux PharmacoEpi platform incollaboration with Janssen® company and supervised by a Scientific Committee

ØStudy design• Two cohorts of mCRPC patients identified using a validated algorithm and initiating a

mCRPC specific treatment with a 5-year history prior index date and a 3-year follow-up:- 2012 cohort: patients initiating a 1st treatment line for mCPRC in 2012- 2014 cohort: patients initiating a 1st treatment line for mCPRC in 2014

ØData source• SNDS: National Healthcare System database covering the overall French population from

birth (or immigration) to death (or emigration), including all reimbursed claims from allFrench healthcare insurance schemes (e.g. drugs, medical visits, medical visits, etc.),hospital-discharge summaries from French public and privates hospitals (e.g. diagnosticcodes, procedures, etc.) and the National death registry

• Selection of patients ≥ 40 years, affiliated to the “Régime Général” insurance scheme(86% of French population) and having a complete healthcare historic

ØSetting• mCRPC 1st line treatments: abiraterone acetate, docetaxel or enzalutamide, all drugs

presumed to be used according to the Summary of Product Characteristics• Previous prostate cancer stages before mCRPC status defined according to the estimated

date of castration resistance and the estimated date of 1st metastasis management:- non-metastatic hormonosensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC)- metastatic hormonosensitive prostate cancer newly diagnosed (NDx mHSPC)- progressive metastatic hormonosensitive prostate cancer (progressive mHSPC)- non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)

Materials & Methods

• Therapeutic strategy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) hasevolved significantly with the introduction of new 1st-line treatments since the end of 2012:- Abiraterone acetate in association with prednisone/prednisolone in December 2012- Enzalutamide in November 2014

Background

Conclusion

• The algorithm, with a positive predictive value of 0.92, enabled the identification of respectively11 668 prevalent mCRPC cases in 2012 and 12 951 in 2014. From them 2 921 patients initiated afirst treatment for mCRPC in 2012 and 3 949 in 2014

• mCRPC prevalence may be slightly underestimated because of the sensitivity of the algorithm (76%)

Results

Figure 1. Identification of population in 2012 and 2014 from SNDS database

Figure 4. Sequences of mCRPC treatment lines over the 3-year follow-up in 2012 and 2014 populations

2012 n = 2 921

2014 n = 3 949

Docetaxel 2 364 (80.9) 1 214 (30.7) Abiraterone acetate 511 (17.5) 2 444 (61.9) Enzalutamide 0 (0.0) 176 (4.5)

Treatment line = at least 2 consecutive dispensing or infusion during follow-up

Figure 2. Disease stage before mCRPC status in 2012 and 2014 CAMERRA populations

Table 1. First treatment line over the 3-year follow-up for 2012 and 2014 populations

• Over the 3-year follow-up, 63% of 2012 population and 58% of 2014 population received a2nd mCRPC treatment line (Figure 4):

- In 2012: the 2nd line was abiraterone acetate for 83% of the concerned patients- In 2014: the 2nd line were enzalutamide and docetaxel for respectively 41% and 31% of the

concerned patients

• In 2012:- Docetaxel mainly used- Few variations according to the stage before mCRPC status

• In 2014:- Abiraterone acetate mainly used in patients with previous stage of progressive mHSPC,

nmHSPC and nmCRPC stages- Abiraterone acetate and docetaxel equally used in patients in patients with previous stage of

NDx mHSPC

2012 2014

• Previous disease stages before mCRPC status barely changed between 2012 and 2014

Identification of 2012 and 2014 study population

Disease stage before mCRPC status

1st treatment line in mCRPC patients

1st treatment line according to disease stage before mCRPC status

Sequences of mCRPC treatment lines

2012 2014

47%nmHSPC

15%NDx mHSPC

18%Progressive

mHSPC

20%nmCRPC

52%nmHSPC

15%NDx mHSPC

15%Progressive

mHSPC

18%nmCRPC

Objectives

ü Between 2012 and 2014, the mCRPC 1st-line treatment shifted from docetaxelfor 4 out of 5 patients to abiraterone acetate for 3 out of 5

ü In 2014, docetaxel or enzalutamide were equally used in 2nd-line after abirateroneacetate

ü Disease stage before mCRPC seemed to have more impact in the treatmentchoice in 2014 than in 2012

Abiraterone acetate Docetaxel Enzalutamide Cabazitaxel Combinationtherapy

No mCRPC treatment Death

Figure 3. 1st treatment line according to disease stage before mCRPC status in 2012 and 2014

2012 2014

Abiraterone acetate Docetaxel EnzalutamideAbiraterone acetate Docetaxel

Prevalent prostate cancer in 2014

n = 386 127

Prevalent metastatic prostate cancer

n = 28 845 (7.5%)

Prevalent mCRPC

n = 12 951 (3.4%)

2014 population

Initiation of mCRPC specific treatment in 2014

n = 3 949

Prevalent CRPC

n = 18 973 (4.9%)

non-CRPCCastration resistant

n = 15 984 n = 12 951

metastaticnon-metastatic

n = 12 951 n = 6 022

Prevalent prostate cancer in 2012

n = 403 983

Prevalent metastatic prostate cancer

n = 36 524 (9.0%)

Prevalent mCRPC

n = 11 668 (2.9%)

2012 population

Initiation of mCRPC specific treatment in 2012

n = 2 921

Prevalent CRPC

n = 18 441 (4.6%)

non-CRPCCastration resistant

n = 24 856 n = 11 668

metastatic

n = 11 668

non-metastatic

n = 6 773