Post on 12-Jan-2016
transcript
CHAPTER 4
CONCEPT DESIGN-What is design concepts?-Generation, evaluation and selection of design concept
?
Info flow during formulation and concept design phases
FormulationFormulationCustomer NeedsCustomer requirementsImportance weightsHouse of QualityEng. characteristicsEng. Design Spec’s Design ConceptsDesign Concepts
“Best”AlternativeConcepts
Conceptual Design
Defined the characteristics of the product Three characteristics:
– Form – shape, size, materials and style– Fit – comparing with the competitors’ product– Function – performance, reliability, maintainability
What is design concepts?
Design concept is an approximate description of the technology, working principles and form of a product.
It has a concise description of how the product will satisfy the customer requirements.
It is usually expressed as a sketch or rough 3D model
Engineers use creativity and imagination to develop approaches to achieve the design objective while satisfying the constraints.
Concept Car/ Prototype
Concept design phase
GenerateAlternatives
ClarifyFunctions
Analyze
Iteration
Will not violate laws of natureLikely to satisfy “must” customer requirementsLikely to satisfy company requirements
Archives, PeopleInternet, Creative methods
Engineering DesignSpecification
1st order calculationsProof of concept testsBench test, Pilot plant
Feasible?
Best Concept(s)
Pugh’s MethodWeighted Rating Method
Evaluate
Activity AnalysisDecomposition DiagramsFunction Structures
Concept Design
yes
no
Clarifying functional requirements
Engineering design specification will usually provide information on customer and company requirements but it may lack sufficient details on specific functions and/or sub-functions.
Three methods may be used to help us clarify the product’s functional requirements.
– Activity Analysis– Product component decomposition– Production function decomposition
Activity analysis
To learn how the customer will use and ultimately retire the product.
Exp., using and retiring a rechargeable electric shaver.
Consider just the daily-use pattern (activities 7-15), maintenance (activities 16-18), and set-up (activities 1-6).
Helps us to understand all the required functions, not just those during daily use and learn how the product interacts with the environment.
In essence, the activities lead to sub-functions that must be accommodated in the final design.
Product component decomposition
When competitive product are available, they can be disassembled into their respective components, and a component decomposition diagram can be drawn.
The product component decomposition diagram is a block diagram of the parts and subassemblies that make up the product.
Ex: Product component decomposition
Product function decomposition
Subdivides the major functional requirement into its respective sub-functions and sub-sub-functions.
Identify whether functions are connected, and where the interface connections might be.
First block describes the overall product function, such as make coffee. Then, the product function is further decomposed into sub-function blocks, such as brew coffee and convert electricity to heat.
The decomposition is continued so as to successively refine the sub-function and understand the logical changes in energy, materials, and signal.
Ex: Product function decomposition
Generating Alternatives Concept from functions
To select the best concepts for further development, we need to systematically generate a lot of alternatives.
We will be looking for concepts that will potentially satisfy the product sub-functions.
The process of generating alternatives is also called synthesis
Generating Alternatives Concept
Where to find information that can be used to generate alternatives:
~ Archives. University, public, and corporate libraries should be first on the list of places to look for alternative concept.
~ People. Starting with our co-workers, university staff, vendor and professional society, we can confer, one on one, with people knowledgeable in the field.
~ Internet. Searching at US Patent Office, vendor Web site catalogs, professional society, and trade organizations.
Generating Alternatives Concept
~ Existing Products. If available, competitive products can be purchased and dissected.
~ Creative Methods. When we are looking for new solutions, however, we might consider the following innovative methods:
~ Brainstorming is an iterative group method that takes advantage of team member’s diverse skills, experience, and personalities to generate innovative ideas.
Developing Products Concept
During concept design we attempt to generate many alternative concepts for each sub-function.
Exp: we generate two concepts for sub-function SF1 and three concepts for sub-function SF2.
We could designate the alternative concepts as Ci,j, where i represent the sub-function and j represent the alternative concept, resulting in SF1: {C11, C12} and SF2: {C21, C22, C23}.
Developing Products Concept
We can list the sub-functions in a column of a matrix, and the alternative concepts for ach function in adjacent rows, as shown in Table 9. This approach is called a morphological matrix.
To stimulate alternative combinations, the design team selects one concept from any column, for each function, proceeding down the matrix.
The total number of theoretically possible combinations is equal to the product of the number of concepts for each function.
In our exp. We have 2 X 3, or 6 combinations.
Exp., a design team is developing new concepts for a gasoline-engine-powered min-bike.
Solution. We prepare the morphological matrix by listing the sub-functions in the leftmost column and the alternative concepts for each sub-function in the same row, as shown in Table 10.
Combining three alternatives for sub-function 1, two alternatives for sub-functions 2, and three alternatives for sub-function 3, we have 3(2)3=18 possible combinations. By systematically indexing row and column subscripts we can produce all 18 combinations
3.5 Analyzing Alternative Concepts
3.5 Analyzing Alternative Concepts Not every alternative that we generate will function or
be manufacturable. Each concept variant is characterized only by its
physical principle and abstract embodiment. The screening criteria should focus on functionality and
manufacturability, and should include:~ Will the concept likely function?~ Will the concept likely meet the customer’s minimum
performance requirements? (These are the “musts”, not the “shoulds”.)
3.5 Analyzing Alternative Concepts
~ Will the concept likely survive the operating environment?
~ Will the concept likely satisfy other critically important customer requirements?
~ Will the concept be manufacturable, (i.e., material and manufacturing processes).
~ Will the concept likely satisfy the financial and or marketing requirements?
During the analyzing and screening process, we will usually find concept variants that should be eliminated.
3.6 Evaluating Alternative Concepts
The remaining alternatives after screening process will also need to be further evaluated.
Two methods commonly used to evaluate alternative concepts are:– Pugh’s concept selection method and – the weighted-rating method.
3.6 Evaluating alternative concepts – Pugh Method
Pugh’s Method for Concept Selection includes the following seven steps:i. The team selects evaluation criteria,
principally from the engineering design specification and other documents prepared during the formulation phase.
ii. A matrix is prepared listing the evaluation criteria in the first column.
iii. The concept are identified in the remaining columns.
3.6 Evaluating alternative concepts – Pugh Method
iv. One concept is selected as the datum concept or reference concept and
labeled as datum.v. The team selects a concept to evaluate.
For each criterion the team marks whether the concept is better (+), worse (-), or about the same (S) as the datum.
vi. Each of the other concept is similarly rated, using the same marking system.
vii All the +’s, -’s and S’s are summed and recorded at the bottom of the matrix.
Exp. Pugh’s method for a go-cart transmission is shown in Table 12. As the team discusses each entry, the team gains a greater understanding of the design problem, the alternative concepts, and the specified requirements.
It would appear that the team favors the gears concept, in that there are more +’s and fewer –’s, as compared to chain concept.
3.6 Evaluating alternative concepts – Weighted Rating
Weighted Rating Method includes the following steps:i. Team selects evaluation criteria.ii. A matrix is prepared listing the evaluation criteria in the
first column.ii. Importance weights are given for the criteria, usually as
percentage points, adding to 100.iii. Concepts are identified in columns. iv. Team rates each concept as unsatisfactory, just
tolerable, adequate, good, or very good using an ordinal scale such as 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. Other scales have also been used.
v. Each concept rating is multiplied by its respective weight and summed to produce an overall rating for the concept.
Exp., weighted rating matrix for a go-cart transmission is shown in Table 14.The process analyzing and evaluating alternative concepts it naturally subjective, mainly because of the abstractness or fuzziness of the concepts.
3.7 Intellectual Property
Intellectual is another form of property that includes ideas.
We typically protect these with trade secrets, contracts, trademarks, trade dress, copyrights, and patents.
Basic types of intellectual property protection such as:i. Trade secrets such as formulas, recipes, methods,
processes, devices, and/or techniques. Exp., Coca cola, KFC, etc.
ii. Contracts is written or verbal agreement between two parties. Exp., non-disclose, confidential, any proprietary information.
3.7 Intellectual Property
iii. Trademark is a symbol, design, word, or combination thereof used by a manufacturer to distinguish its products from those of its competitors. Exp., IBM, Pentium, Coke, etc.
iv. Copyright such that the author can exclusively publish and produce his works and/or sell the rights to his works like books, sheet music, photos, dramas, movies, sermons, etc.
v. Patent is a document granting legal monopoly rights to produce, use, sell, or profit from an invention, process, plant (biological), or design. Exp., utility patent such as Xerox copying, halogen light bulbs. Exp., design patent is ornamental aspects of a product such as shape, configuration, and/or any surface decoration.
What is patent?
The term "patent" usually refers to a right granted to anyone who invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof