Post on 15-Mar-2016
description
transcript
Clickstream analysis - data collection, preprocessing and mining using
LISp-Miner system
Effective placement of on-line advertising
Tomáš KliegrKIZI
A case study approach
Methodology
• CRISP-DM
I. Data collection
• Data are collected on the server application layer
• No demands on the tracked website• ASP.NET must be supported
UML Sequence diagram
Comparison with log-file based approaches
Advantages• Works with all browsers with enabled cookies• Automatic robot filtering• Storage efficiency• Easy to integrate & safe to operate
Disadvantages• Database required• Hosting must support .NET Framework
II. Data preprocessingProblem: collected click streams have varying
lengths.This phase creates a fixed-length visitor’s profile in
a two step processSegment procedure: classifies pages into a
domain specific taxonomy on several levels of granularity.
Merge procedure: extracts important and characteristic information from visitor’s clickstream.
Segment procedure
• Classifies pages into a domain specific taxonomy on several levels of granularity.
• Assigns Time on page and Score to each page in visitor’s clickstream
• Score expresses absolute weight of a particular page in user’s click stream.
S = (ln(O) + 1)* to – order of a page in users clickstreamt – time on page
Assigning pages to categories
Visited pages (URL addresses
Stored in a database)
Prespecified taxonomy(tuples ProductID - category,
Tuples URL pattern – category)
SQL Server SPSegment
Pages classified on several levels of granularity
Segment – Example outputPage
www.poznani.cz/hiking-alps/
General category (Cat)Search
Extended Category (ECat)Catalogue
TopicAlps
Merge procedureThis procedure creates the visitor profile:• Basic attributes (6): Total time on web, Number of
displayed pages, Day of week, Hour of day, Referring domain (constituted by URL and Cat attributes).
• Important points on the path (12): Entry page, Exit page, Conversion page. (Page name, Cat, ECat and S).
• Attributes conceptualizing the path (11): Range of interest, Most favourite topic (Topic, S), Search total (S) and Search analytically (Fulltext (S), Extended search (S),Catalogue Search (S)), General information pages total (S) and analytically (Discounts(S), Insurance (S), About (S)).
Merge – example output
III. Datamining
• Association Rules are the most frequently used approach [Facci, Lanza]
• LISp-Miner system - 4ft-Miner, SD4ft-Miner
• Categories created in LMDataSource
Sample tasks
• Task 1:– From which referring class of websites do most
converted visitors come?• Task 2:
– What are the visitor’s interests in relation to the referring server
• Task 3:– Relation between provision of information on
discounts, insurance and entrance page and conversion
Choosing the right quantifier
• Founded implication – Support a, a/(a+b+c+d)– Confidence a/(a+b)– Problem: tight dependancies rarely found and
rarely required in clickstream data• Above average quantifier
“Among objects satisfying Ant there are at least 100*p per cent more objects satisfying Suc then there are objects satisfying Suc in the whole data matrix.” LISp-Miner Help
SD4ft-Miner• Mines for patterns of the form /(,,)• This SD4ft-Pattern means that the subsets given
by Boolean attributes , differ in what concerns the relation of Boolean attributes , when condition is satisfied.
• What groups of customers , (i.e. depending on where they come from) under what condition remarkably differ when it comes to the probability of conversion.
• We express “the conversion condition” by setting only the succedent () and we leave the antecedent unset.
4ft Miner vs SD4ft4ft-Miner, Above Average Quant.
SD4ft-Miner, (neg. gace type for 2nd subset)
The value of increase in the conversion rate is more suitable for out purposes as the 2nd set is disjunctive with the 1st set. The cr. For partner webs is 78 % higher than is the average for other referrers
Con1/Conf2= 0,132/0,074 = 1,784
Solution to Task 1From which referring class of websites do most
converted visitors come?
Conversion rate
0
0,05
0,1
0,15Fulltexts
Catalogues
No referer
Other
Partner webs
Own webs
Conversion rate
SD4Ft – cont.
• If the output is sorted according to Difference of values of confidence
• The first rule says: Conversion rate for visitors coming from
partner websites is 13.2%, while conversion rate for visitors coming from company’s own websites is only 4.9%.
Review
• The goal of the second run of the CRISP-DM Cycle is to
• improve currently used tools, • increase the quality of current attributes• add new attributes by involving page texts• wrap feasible solutions into Ferda modules
I. Data collection
• Track visitors across visits– Permanent cookies
• Track real actions not only page views– Add parameters
• Stronger normalization– Database can become easily full under
current implementation
II. Data preprocessing• Provide tool for taxonomy design and matching
– Match pages to taxonomies semi-manually • based on pattern in URL• Based on words in documents
– Automatically cluster pages using information retrieval methods
• Functionally – repeating content in sidebars, etc.• Semantically – use headings, title, em, strong,desc.
– Assumption: Commercial content is written for search engines.
– Use Wordnet to assign hypernyms to keywords– Negative use of WordNet could aid distinguishing product
names
This Boring Headline is Written for Google
• New York Times: “About a year ago, The Sacramento Bee
changed online section titles. "Real Estate" became "Homes," "Scene" turned into "Lifestyle," and dining information found in newsprint under "Taste," is online under "Taste/Food."'"
Preprocessing cont.
Are there more relavant pages to this keyword?
Does this keyword occur on some other page
of the web?
Possible Google Bomb / negative reputationPossible mistake in SEOAll is the way it
should be
No Yes Yes No
Are the keywords used to find the document on a search engine contained in the document?
Yes No
III. DataMining
– Example DM task 1: Which “classes” of words are most frequently used?
– Example DM task 2: What two groups of people (e.g. googling for Africa vs. Mountain biking) under what condition (did they buy something) remarkably differ what concerns the relation of number of visited pages and number of visited topics
Conclusion
• To do:– Utilize (Euro)WordNet– Assign different weights based on HTML Tags – Test feasibility of Query/Document
coocurrencies (Sample DM Tasks)• If it works:
– Include/ Write Spider– Write taxonomy editor/miner– Wrap it all as Ferda modules