Post on 27-Mar-2015
transcript
Continuous Continuous Improvement Improvement
UpdateUpdate
Continuous Continuous Improvement Improvement
UpdateUpdateJune 11, 2007June 11, 2007
(Your School/Department’s Mission Statement Here)
(Your School/Department’s SMART Goals Here)
Hoover School Improvement Plan 2006-2007
Excellence for All
The mission of the Hoover community is to develop life-long learners and responsible citizens through continuous
improvement and excellence for all.
Customer Satisfaction Data-Driven Decisions
Learning for All Teamwork
Visionary Leadership
Reading Comprehension During the 2006-2007 school year the number of K-5 students at Hoover who improve their reading comprehension skills will increase by 5% in each grade level as measured by the District Benchmark Reading Assessments (LAPO & ERA). Math Computation During the 2006-2007 school year, the percentage of students scoring in the high and intermediate proficiency levels will increase in math computation at Hoover Elementary as measured by the district math assessments and the ITBS. Social, Emotional, Behavioral- School Climate During the 2006-2007 school year, Hoover students in grade 2-5 will increase their level of student respect based on the Hoover student satisfaction survey.
Continuous Improvement
VISION
HOOVER MISSION
CORE VALUES
HOOVER SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GOALS
GUIDING PHILOSOPHY
Increase % of staff implementing practices of the 4 Quality Levels
Scorecard Measure # 3.D.
Continuous Improvement
Self-Assessment
Deployment Survey April 2007All Schools - Classroom Teachers
Average Response
0
1
2
3
4
Distric
t Miss
ion
Core
Value
s
Class
room
Miss
ion
Stude
nt M
ission
Groun
d Rul
es
Goals
Class
room
Goals
Stude
nt
Celeb
rate
Goa
ls
Compa
rativ
e Dat
a
Data
Cente
r
Feed
back
Cla
ssro
om
Data
Fold
ers
Class
Mee
tings
PDSA C
lass
room
Qtools Cla
ssro
om
Qtools Stu
dent
Stand
ardi
ze P
roce
sses
Qualit
y W
ork
Std L
ed
Elementary
Middle
High
0 = Not Present
1 = No, Thinking about it
2 = Yes, Beginning
Stages
4 = Yes, Completely
Implemented
3 = Yes, Almost
completely
82.4%
58.8% 56.5%
19.1%
58.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DistrictMission
Core Values ClassroomMission
StudentMission
GroundRules
Deployment Survey April 2007Mission, Vision & Alignment
All Schools
Yes-Completely Implemented
Yes-Almost complete
Yes-Beginning stages
No-Thinking about it
No-Not present
16.1%
36.9%
17.1%
33.3%
10.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ComparativeData
Data Center Feedback Classroom
Data Folders ClassMeetings
Deployment Survey April 2007Data & Feedback
All SchoolsYes-Completely Implemented
Yes-Almost complete
Yes-Beginning stages
No-Thinking about it
No-Not present
FindingsStrengths
• Mission, Vision & Core Values
• Ground Rules• Data Centers• Data Folders• Quality Tools
Areas of Focus• Student Mission• Comparative data• Class Meetings• PDSA in the Classroom• Standardizing key
process• Student-Led
Conferences
•2006-07 (Baseline) 29.9%•2007-08 (Target) 50%•2008-09 (Target) 70%•2009-10 (Target) 85%•2010-11 (Target) 100%
2006-2007 Data = 29.9% Completely
Implemented
Next Steps• Baseline measure tracked in scorecard• Utilize data for professional
development – Site based (Quality Liaison support)– District professional development
• Support Services continued deployment
• Action Research Teams & Quality Liaisons