Post on 17-Jan-2018
description
transcript
Copyright © 2012 Lozano SmithCopyright © 2012 Lozano Smith
Defensible Assessments and Avoiding Legal Blindspots
January 17, 2013ACSA
Presented by:
Beth Nishida, M.A.Hacienda La Puente Unified School District
and Ricardo R. Silva, Esq.Lozano Smith
Copyright © 2012 Lozano SmithCopyright © 2012 Lozano Smith
• Why Special Education Administrators should focus on improving LEA assessments:– The foundation for eligibility, services and
placement. – A weak foundation compromises everything
else.– A strong foundation sets the course for
success. – Don’t pay for their expert.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
33
CHILD FINDObligation or Opportunity?
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
44
Child Find - Obligation
“The IDEA imposes an affirmative obligation on the
School District to identify and evaluate children with
disabilities.”(Seattle School District No. 1 v. B.S. (9th Cir. 1996) 82 F.3d 1493.)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
55
Child Find - Opportunity
The Threshold For Suspecting A Student Has A Disability is Low:
• District must respond within a reasonable time after receiving notice of a potential disability.
• District deemed to have notice if student’s behavior or poor academic performance indicates a possible need for special education.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
6
Child Find – Opportunity
Child Find: It is also an opportunity to:• Lay the foundation for appropriate
eligibility and services.• Set course for the IEP team.• Preserve the right to defend your
assessments.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
77
ASSESSMENTS
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
88
Assessments
• The IDEA Obligates Districts To Assess Students In All Areas Of Suspected Disabilities.
(20 U.S.C. § 1414(b)(3)(B) and Educ. Code, § 56320(f).)
“A child’s unique needs are to be broadly construed to include the child’s academic, social, health, emotional, communicative, physical, and vocational needs.”
(Seattle SD No. 1 v. B.S. (9th Cir. 1996) 82 F.3d 1493, 1500.)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
99
Assessments
• An assessment is not just standardized testing; it is a comprehensive analysis of the student.
• An assessment should include, for example:– review of records.– standardized testing.– observations in multiple settings.– parent/teacher interview.– student interview.
• When assessing non-academic needs, standardized tests alone are not likely to be sufficient.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1010
Assessments
Timelines:– Are District’s responsibility / obligation.– Staff must know timelines. – Can make or break a case.– Follow-up is key.
(20 U.S.C. § 1414(a)(1)(C) andEduc. Code, § § 56302.1 and 56043(c).)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1111
Assessments – Potential Blind Spot
It is important to assess all areas of suspected disability. Often overlooked areas:• Behavior• Attention• Medical• Social / Emotional• Communication
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1212
Assessments
Protocols:• Assessments must be administered in accordance
with instructions provided by the producer of the assessments.
Ed. Code § 56320, subd. (b)(3)
• Parents will use protocols to try to show that assessments did not comply with the instructions.
• Properly-completed protocols can be strong evidence supporting the district’s position.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1313
Assessments
Observation:
• Observations in the education setting are critical to an appropriate assessment:– The public agency must ensure that the child is
observed in the child’s learning environment (including the regular classroom setting) to document the child’s academic performance and behavior in the areas of difficulty.
34 C.F.R. 300.310(a)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1414
Assessments
Observation:
• Child not school age or out of school:– In the case of a child of less than school age
or out of school, a member of the IEP team must observe the child in an environment appropriate for a child of the age.
300 C.F.R. 300.310(c)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1515
Assessments
Observation:• Easy access to the school setting and staff is a
key advantage that district assessments have over private assessments.
• Conversely, failure to observe and consult with staff can seriously weaken the credibility of a district assessment.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1616
Assessments
Assessment Reports:The personnel who assess the pupil shall prepare a written report, of the results of each assessment. The report shall include, but not be limited to:(1) Whether the pupil may need special
education and related services.
(2) The basis for making the determination.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1717
Assessments
Assessment Reports:(3) The relevant behavior noted during the observation
of the pupil in an appropriate setting.(4) The relationship of that behavior to the pupil’s
academic and social functioning.(5) The educationally relevant health and development,
and medical findings, if any.(6) For pupils with learning disabilities, whether there is
such a discrepancy between achievement and ability that it cannot be corrected without special education and related services.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1818
Assessments
Assessment Reports:(7) A determination concerning the effects of
environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage, where appropriate.
(8) The need for specialized services, materials, and equipment for pupils with low incidence disabilities, consistent with legal guidelines.
(Educ. Code, § 56327.)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
1919
Assessments – Potential Blind Spot
Reassessment:• Students eligible for special education
services can only be reassessed once per year:– Unless district and parents agree in
writing.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2020
Assessments – Potential Blind Spot
Reassessment:• District’s obligation to assess is not
extinguished by completion of a single initial assessment:– When a district has a reason to suspect all
of the student's needs aren’t being met, it is required to reassess.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2121
“Child with a Disability” is a two-pronged analysis: • Does the child meet the criteria associated with
one of the disability categories under the law (e.g., speech-language impairment); AND
• Does the child need special education and related services as a result of this disability?
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2222
California law:• An individual with exceptional needs is one
who, because of a disability “requires instruction and services which cannot be provided with modification of the regular school program in order to ensure that the individual is provided a free and appropriate public education…” (Educ. Code § 56026(b).)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2323
Potential Blind Spots
Problem Areas:• Failing to assess all areas of suspected disability.• Poor choice of assessment instruments.• Improperly completed protocols – basal/ceiling,
added incorrectly• Failing to observe student and consult with
teachers and service providers.• Unimpressive assessment reports.• Lack of analysis.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2424
Potential Blind Spots
Problem Areas:• Appearance of bias.• Embarrassing or substantive typos – confusing
he/she, wrong name in report, listing a test with no scores.
• Not providing the entire picture.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2525
Assessments – Potential Blind Spot
Example:• Private assessment report included 19 incorrect
test scores. Assessor blamed her secretary, but the hearing officer accorded very little weight to the report, and found the assessor to not be a credible witness.
Manteca Unified Sch. Dist. (SEHO 2002), SEHO SN 02-01151
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2626
Potential Blind Spots
Common Errors In Selection of Assessment Instruments:– Outdated assessment instruments.– Using same instrument less than a year after
previous administration.– Screening assessments, instead of full-scale,
standardized assessments.– Using instrument outside normed ages
inappropriately.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2727
Potential Blind Spots
If an assessment must include any of those issues, the assessment report should:– Explain why the assessment instrument was
used.– Explain that the validity of the results are
potentially unreliable.– Have alternative data supporting any
conclusions based in any part upon the problematic assessment instruments.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2828
Potential Blind Spots
Problem Areas:• Assessment reports that only list test scores,
without explaining what they mean, provide little useful information, and arguably prevent parents from meaningfully participating.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
2929
Potential Blind Spots
Problem Areas:• Appearance of bias can significantly diminish the
effectiveness of a report.• Test scores should be interpreted objectively,
and not ‘spun’ to support a particular narrative.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3030
Potential Blind Spots
Problem Areas:• An assessment can be substantively
outstanding, but typographical and grammatical errors will impact its credibility. (E.g., use of “its” and “it’s”.)
• Substantive errors, such as incorrect test scores, can call the entire assessment report into question.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3131
Why You Want Each and Every Assessment to be Appropriate:
Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3232
IEEs
• A parent may request an IEE at public expense if the parent disagrees with a school district’s evaluation.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3333
IEEs
• In response to a parent request for an IEE, the district must without undue delay:– Initiate due process, and demonstrate at
the due process hearing its assessments were appropriate;
OR– Provide an IEE at public expense.
Request for IEEs are time sensitive! Why?
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
34
IEEs
• “Timelines for school districts to decide how to act when a parent request an IEE are [purposely] short.” – Act promptly in order to ensure that information about
the child is current and accurate.• Failure to promptly and properly respond to a
request may entitle the parents to an IEE at the district’s expense, regardless of whether the assessment itself was appropriate.
(Fullerton Unified School District, OAH Case No. 2011061318 (January 30, 2012).)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
35
IEEs
• Even if the parents delay in requesting an IEE:– District must still respond without undue delay– OAH may still order district to fund IEE
• However, parents must request an IEE within two years of the district’s assessment with which they disagree.
(Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, OAH Case No. 2012051153 (August 7, 2012).)
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3636
IEEs
• Making the Decision to Fund or File:– Review the assessment that the parent
disagrees with, including protocols.– All components of an appropriate assessment
must be present if the District wants to file for due process.
– Failure to conduct an appropriate assessment eliminates the ability to defend your assessments.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3737
IEEs
• Upon request for an IEE, the district must also provide the following to the parent:– Information about where an IEE may be
obtained, and
• The district may ask for the parent’s reasons for objecting to the district’s assessment, but the parent is not required to respond.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
38
IEEs
• IEE Agency Criteria– Cost containment.– Geographic limitations.– Exceptions – options - _____ criteria.– File for Due Process Hearing.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
3939
IEEs
• If the parent obtains an IEE at private expense, the results of that IEE:– Must be considered, and– May be presented as evidence at a due
process hearing.• Districts must allow assessors “an
equivalent opportunity” to observe current placements and proposed placements.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4040
RISKS OF ASSESSING INAPPROPRIATELY
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4141
Risks
• Failure to identify needs.• Loss of education because needs not
properly identified.• Denials of FAPE.• Loss of credibility of assessor.• Payment of IEEs.• Payment of attorney fees.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4242
Testifying
WE’VE DONE EVERYTHING RIGHT, BUT
THERE IS STILL A DISPUTE... NOW WHAT?
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
43
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Evaluate your assessment and
circumstances (Facts):– Look at Assessment Report.– Evaluate witnesses:
• Weak Witnesses.• Strong Witnesses.
– Evaluate Risks:• FAPE.• Financial.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
44
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Prepare Staff:
– Human Resources impact.– Emotional toll.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4545
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Do not to take it personally.• Be professional and courteous.• Be prepared:
– Review testing, protocols and report.– Review student’s records.
• Be honest.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4646
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Things to discuss with Staff:
– Okay to be nervous.– Managing the human aspect.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4747
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Speak confidently, answering questions carefully
and professionally.• Your tone, demeanor, body language and
appearance assist you in conveying to the ALJ that your testimony is accurate and truthful.
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4848
Testifying
Testifying in a Hearing:• Do not become angry or defensive.• Listen to the questions carefully and be brief in
your responses.• Think before speaking.• Do not guess or speculate.• Remember, the ALJ is very interested in hearing
from you!
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
4949
Thank you for attending!
Copyright © Lozano Smith 2012Copyright © 2013 Lozano Smith
50
Copyright © 2013 LOZANO SMITHAll rights reserved. No portion of this work may be copied, or sold or used for any commercial advantage or private gain, nor any derivative work prepared therefrom, without the express prior written permission of LOZANO SMITH through its Managing Shareholder. The Managing Shareholder of LOZANO SMITH hereby grants permission to any client of LOZANO SMITH to whom LOZANO SMITH provides a copy to use such copy intact and solely for the internal purposes of such client.
Disclaimer:These materials and all discussions of these materials are for instructional purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should contact your local school counsel or an attorney at LOZANO SMITH. If you are interested in having other in-service programs on school law presented in your school district, please contact clientservices@lozanosmith.com or call (559) 431-5600.
256983