Post on 30-Jan-2022
transcript
The Efficacy of a Stress Management and Self-Care Training on Student Teachers’ Stress Levels
by
Macy E. Waltz, BS, MEd
A Dissertation
In
COUNSELOR EDUCATION
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Texas Tech University in
Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Approved
Janet Hicks, PhD, LPC, CSC Chair of Committee
Charles Crews, PhD, LPC, CSC
Hansel Burley, PhD
Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School
May, 2016
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
ii
ACKNOWEDGEMENTS
First, I would like to thank God for giving me direction and purpose in this crazy,
beautiful thing called life. All glory, praise, and honor to Him. I thank Him for believing
in me and providing such great family, friends, and mentors to support me through this
process. I am forever grateful for it, Lord.
To my committee, thank you for your patience as I stumbled through this
adventure. Your encouragement, guidance, and wisdom are the reason I have made it this
far. Dr. Hicks, you are a true example of a woman of character. I admire you for so many
reasons, and hope to inspire students in the future the way you have inspired me. Dr.
Crews, your personality and pizazz have always been qualities I enjoyed whether I was
sitting in your class or receiving help for my dissertation. You make teaching fun and I
hope to do the same! Dr. Burley, bless you for the patience and kindness you have shown
to me when discussing statistical analysis. I could not have chosen a better professor to be
on my committee for this role. I have learned so much from each of you as professors and
advisors. Thank you all for being my biggest cheerleaders and supporting me until the
very end of this adventure.
A special thanks goes out to Amber Lancaster and Lesley Shelton from the
Doctoral Support Center. It is likely that Amber read through my dissertation just as
many times as I did. You have been there for me since the beginning of this process, by
helping me develop the idea and a plan to make it happen. You have spent hours
reviewing this dissertation over the last year, multiple times. I thank you for your never-
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
iii
ending support and encouragement. To Lesley Shelton, thank you for helping this
dissertation get into tip-top shape! You are the formatting-queen!
To my family who have supported me financially, emotionally, physically, and
mentally for the past decade of college, THANK YOU! You are one of the greatest
examples of love and this would not be possible without you. To my lovely friends, thank
you for pushing me to never give up. Thank you for the late night pep talks, dance party
breaks, and endless encouragement. I will always be grateful for you.
There were a number of other people who made this research study possible from
the College of Education. Thank you Sherre Heider and other staff members for helping
me with the details of this study. I cannot thank you enough for giving up your time and
energy to help me.
This is one of my greatest accomplishments and each one of you deserves all the
praise in the world for the kindness and patience you have shown. Thank you!
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... ii
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... viii
LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... x
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
Overview of the Study .............................................................................................. 2
Stress and Teachers .............................................................................................. 2The Statement of Problem ......................................................................................... 4
The Purpose of the Study .......................................................................................... 4
Statement of Hypotheses ........................................................................................... 5
Significance of the Study .......................................................................................... 6
Population and Sample .............................................................................................. 7
Sampling ............................................................................................................... 7Treatment .................................................................................................................. 8
Site Supervisor Curriculum: The Control Group. ................................................ 8Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................. 8
Model of Burnout ................................................................................................. 8Wellness Model .................................................................................................... 9Self-Construct: Self-Efficacy ............................................................................. 10
Instrumentation ....................................................................................................... 10
Data Collection and Analysis .................................................................................. 11
Structure of Experimental and Control Groups .................................................. 11Delimitations ........................................................................................................... 12
Limitations .............................................................................................................. 12
Definitions of Key Terms ........................................................................................ 13
Basic Assumptions .................................................................................................. 15
Organization of the Study ....................................................................................... 15
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ......................................................................... 17
History of Stress and Counselors ............................................................................ 17
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
v
Community Leaders: LPCs and CSCs ............................................................... 19Balancing Work and Stress ................................................................................ 21Student Teacher Background ............................................................................. 22Stress and Strain ................................................................................................. 24
History of Stress and Teachers ................................................................................ 25
Causes of the Stress Problem ............................................................................. 27Society, Teachers, and Stress ............................................................................. 31Teacher Preparation Programs ........................................................................... 33
Role of Counseling .................................................................................................. 35
Relevant Theories to the Field of Counseling .................................................... 35Maslach’s Model of Burnout .............................................................................. 36Osipow’s Theory of Occupational Stress ........................................................... 37Wellness Training: The Experimental Group .................................................... 39Wellness: Theories and Techniques ................................................................... 41Self-Construct: Self-Efficacy ............................................................................. 43
Components and Rationale of Treatment ................................................................ 43
Ethical Issues ........................................................................................................... 44
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 46
Overview ................................................................................................................. 46
Hypotheses .............................................................................................................. 47
Setting ..................................................................................................................... 47
Participants .............................................................................................................. 50
Materials .................................................................................................................. 51
Instrumentation ....................................................................................................... 52
Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R) ............................................... 53Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form) .............................................. 54Stress Overload Scale (SOS) .............................................................................. 56Demographic Survey .......................................................................................... 56
Design ..................................................................................................................... 56
Threats to Validity ................................................................................................... 57
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
vi
Internal Validity ................................................................................................. 58External Validity ................................................................................................ 59
Procedure ................................................................................................................. 60
The Experimental and Control Groups .............................................................. 60The Experimental Group .................................................................................... 61The Control Group ............................................................................................. 63
Risk Factors of Study .............................................................................................. 64
Data Analysis .......................................................................................................... 64
RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 66
Research Design ...................................................................................................... 66
Demographic Data .................................................................................................. 67
Age, Gender, and Ethnicity ................................................................................ 68Teaching Certification Level, Relationship Status, Education, and Number of Children .......................................................................................................... 70GPA, Block, and Type of School ....................................................................... 73
Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................................... 75
Scoring Scales .................................................................................................... 75Hypothesis Testing .................................................................................................. 78
Results ................................................................................................................ 79Summary of the Statistical Analyses .................................................................. 83
FINDINGS .................................................................................................................. 84
Summary of the Findings ........................................................................................ 84
Discussion of the Findings ...................................................................................... 86
Hypotheses ......................................................................................................... 86Significance of the Results ...................................................................................... 91
Implications for Practice and Research .............................................................. 91Limitations of the Study ..................................................................................... 95
Recommendations for Future Research .................................................................. 96
Recommendations .............................................................................................. 96Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 98
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 100
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
vii
APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 108
Recruitment Envelope Materials-Flyer ................................................................. 108
Recruitment Envelope Materials-Participant Instructions .................................... 109
Recruitment Envelopment Materials-Gift Card Information ................................ 110
Recruitment Envelope Materials- Letter to Participants ....................................... 111
Recruitment Envelope Materials- Informed Consent Form .................................. 112
Research Packet Materials- Packet Instructions ................................................... 115
Research Packet Materials- Demographic Survey ................................................ 116
Training Materials-PowerPoint Presentation and Commentary ........................... 117
Training Materials-Solution Focused Brief Therapy Technique .......................... 143
Training Materials- Relaxation Therapy Technique ............................................. 145
Instrument Permission Letters-Stress Overload Scale .......................................... 147
Instrument Permission Letters-Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short
form) ................................................................................................................. 148
Instrument Permission Letters-Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised ............... 149
Reminder Emails and Flyers- Email Reminder for Experimental Group: Group
A ....................................................................................................................... 150
Reminder Emails and Flyers- Email Reminder for Control Group: Group B ...... 151
Reminder Emails and Flyers-Flyer Reminder for Research Project ..................... 152
Reminder Emails and Flyers-Email Reminder for Delayed Posttest .................... 153
Reminder Emails and Flyers-Flyer Reminder for Delayed Posttest ..................... 154
Reminder Emails and Flyers-Email Reminder for Control Group Spring 2016
Training ............................................................................................................ 155
Pretest Box Plots ................................................................................................... 156
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
viii
ABSTRACT
Teachers who experience long-term stress and have not developed healthy coping skills
are more likely to leave the profession (Coronado, 2011). New teachers make up
significant percentage of those leaving (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014). This
dissertation studied student teachers’ overall wellness by examining the effectiveness of a
stress training on participants’ overall scores of psychological strain, coping resources,
self-efficacy, and stress overload. The proposed study looked at student teachers rather
than in-service teachers by taking a preventative stance on new-teacher attrition. Stress
curriculum is often not a primary focus within teacher preparation programs, leaving new
teachers to “learn as they go” while transitioning into their new role. This study provided
a foundation for developing curriculum to be included in teacher preparation programs in
the future. A MANCOVA was used to test the four hypotheses listed and the alpha level
used was .05.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Six Dimensions of Wellness .......................................................................... 40
Table 2: Age and GPA by Group ................................................................................. 69
Table 3: Gender by Group ........................................................................................... 69
Table 4: Ethnicity by Group ........................................................................................ 70
Table 5: Teaching Certification Level by Groups ....................................................... 72
Table 6: Relationship Status by Groups ....................................................................... 72
Table 7: Education by Groups ..................................................................................... 73
Table 8: Number of Children by Groups ..................................................................... 73
Table 9: Block by Groups ............................................................................................ 75
Table 10: Type of School by Groups ........................................................................... 75
Table 11: Summary of Results ..................................................................................... 82
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Percent Annual 1st-Year Teacher Attrition, 1988-98 and 2008-09 ............. 26
Figure 2: Age of School Teachers, 1987, 2007, and 2011 ........................................... 27
Figure 3: Cumulative Percent Attrition of Beginning Teachers by Years of
Experience, 1993-2003 ............................................................................... 29
Figure 4: ABC Model .................................................................................................. 42
Figure 5: Map Big- Lubbock, Texas ............................................................................ 49
Figure 6: Tech is Best in West- College of Education ................................................. 49
Figure 7: Stress Overload Scale (SOS) Total ............................................................ 156
Figure 8: Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) Mean ............................................... 157
Figure 9: Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) Mean ....................................... 157
Figure 10: Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ) Mean ...................................... 158
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
1
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
“Progress means getting nearer to the place you want to be. And if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer. If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; and in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive man.” -C.S. Lewis
Life is a constant balancing act when it comes to making decisions. Healthy
decisions are made when individuals are taking care of their overall wellness. Unhealthy
decisions are usually made when individuals are not dealing with their own stress or
using appropriate self-care skills. When an individual feels stressed, often times his or her
own personal wellness is tainted first. The decisions become less about what they need to
do and more about what other people need from them. Research has shown stress to be
connected to multiple disorders, illnesses, and diseases. It is also a cause of numerous
psychological and physical symptoms. Because people deal with various amounts of
stress on a daily basis, they experience various emotions and have to make decisions in
the midst of them.
This dissertation describes a research study that investigated student teachers’
knowledge on stress management, self-care, and self-efficacy, while providing them with
additional education on each of these areas through an experiential stress training.
Following the treatment, student teachers were assessed on whether the training improved
their levels of psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
2
Overview of the Study
Stress impacts people in the United States on a daily basis by negatively affecting
their personal well-being. According to a report by the American Psychological
Association in 2015, the top four sources of stress were money, work (if employed),
family responsibilities, and health concerns (American Psychological Association, 2015).
These sources of stress negatively impacted individuals’ well-being by increasing stress
levels. Stress levels continued to increase over the years and statistics from a national
study conducted in 2015 revealed 77% of people regularly experience physical symptoms
caused by stress, and 73% experience psychological symptoms caused by stress (Statistic
Brain Research Institute, 2015). It is clear stress has affected a significant number of
people all over the nation. Stressors, or causes of stress, effect communities, and
particularly impact the school system through educators and student outcomes (Sass et
al., 2012). Teachers are vital members of a community, and the teaching profession is one
being drastically influenced by stress.
Stress and Teachers
Teachers in Texas experienced less satisfaction in their profession due to the
pressures of high-stakes testing and accountability (Sass, Flores, Claeys, & Perez, 2012),
among a multitude of other stressors. Coping with professional and personal stressors
puts individuals’ health in jeopardy and lowers their self-efficacy. In fact, stress has
become a part of everyday life and is now accepted as a norm. Teachers try to minimize
or “put up” with symptoms, whether in a healthy or unhealthy manner, rather than
alleviating or preventing them all together. Their stress emanates from family, friends,
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
3
school, finances, or work. Occupational or work stress adds a number of additional
stressors to teachers’ previously stress filled lives. If a teacher’s occupational stress is not
dealt with early on, stress can develop into strain, which eventually leads to burnout.
Stress, strain, and burnout. When researching stress, readers saw a debate
existed on whether stress is a stimulus or a response (Sharit & Salvendy, 1982). This
debate has been around for years and many definitions stemmed from both viewpoints.
McGrath (1970) defines stress as “a perceived, substantial imbalance between demand
and response capability, under conditions where failure to meet the demand has
important, perceived consequences.” Mental or bodily tension from stress stemmed from
stressors on a personal and professional level. Occupational stress originated from the
workplace and causes psychological and physiological strain (French, 1976). Stress turns
into stress overload and stress overload turns into strain if the symptoms are not dealt
with quickly. Strain occurs when excessive stress starts to interfere with one’s life over
an extended period of time (American Psychological Association, 2013). When constant
strain occurs, one consequence for a working professional is burnout. For this study,
burnout was characterized as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced
personal accomplishment (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996). Teachers are experiencing
higher levels of burnout at a quicker rate now than ever before; new teachers are leaving
the profession within the first five years and experienced teachers are leaving before
retirement-age (Ingersoll, Merrill, & Stuckey, 2014). This growing issue needs to be
addressed soon or else the impact of teachers’ stress and their leaving the profession is
likely to have a vast negative influence on individuals, families, and communities.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
4
The Statement of Problem
According to the Alliance for Excellent Education, almost half a million U.S.
teachers move or leave the profession each year and between 40-50% of new teachers
leave within the first five years (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014). Teachers leave
the profession for various reasons, but one reason noted among researchers is job-related
stress (McCarthy, Lambert, O'Donnell, & Melendres, 2009; Sass et al., 2012). Teachers
face multiple challenges throughout their career from dealing with student behavior to
complying with complex federal and state mandates. The amount of stress teachers
undertook from administrators, parents, and students while working in an adamant
environment lead to feelings of isolation, disrespect, low levels of morale and job
satisfaction, increased job strain, and low self-efficacy—factors that contributed to a
teacher’s decision to leave the profession.
The Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is three-fold: (1) to investigate student teachers’
knowledge on stress, self-care, and self-efficacy; (2) to educate them through a stress
training; and (3) to assess the effects of the stress training on student teachers’
psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload. Teachers are
dealing with constant stress throughout their career and many are unable to effectively
manage stress. However, providing early training to student teachers, or teacher
candidates in the later phase, during their teacher preparation program may increase their
awareness of stress symptoms and provide new coping strategies. Student teachers can
manage stress before and throughout their career by using these strategies. This training
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
5
provided student teachers with effective coping strategies that decreased stress levels and
increased their sense of self-efficacy, thus, possibly increasing the longevity of teachers’
careers and improving the quality of education for students.
Statement of Hypotheses
The following hypotheses were investigated:
1. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group with regards to psychological strain as measured by the Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire.
2. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group in regard to coping resources as measured by the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ).
3. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in teacher self-efficacy as
measured by the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form).
4. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in stress overload as
measured by the Stress Overload Scale (SOS).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
6
Significance of the Study
When teachers prematurely leave the teaching profession, students, school
districts, and communities are negatively impacted. Many teachers are ill prepared for the
job strain of teaching and leave the profession when they can no longer cope. Some
believe one reason teachers are leaving is due to job-related stress, and their current
schooling is lacking a training program that emphasizes stress management and self-care.
Proper training can start within a teacher certification program and grow throughout
one’s career. Their training begins and ends in a classroom, and what happens between
the certification program and starting out as a new teacher may make all the difference
between a teacher staying or leaving the profession.
Teachers’ training begins before they step foot in a classroom, through a
university teacher preparation program or an alternative teacher certification program.
This training continues throughout their career during professional development and
other continuing education opportunities. Training varies depending upon the district and
needs within each school. There are many areas professionals may not be educated on,
such as how to identify symptoms of stress. However, no guarantee exists student
teachers and in-service teachers are taught self-care before and during their career in this
profession. One method of self-care is teaching educators stress management techniques,
which may also promote higher self-efficacy. If teachers are shown support by learning
these techniques before their career begins and throughout their career, we may see an
increase in retention for new and experienced teachers.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
7
This study focused on student teachers rather than in-service teachers, due to vast
amounts of new teachers leaving the profession. This study took a preventative stance by
providing education and preparation to student teachers before they stepped into full-time
teaching positions. Student teachers were able to practice techniques taught during the
stress training as they gained real teaching experience through student teaching. Student
teaching is a valuable time for these up-coming teachers. They have more time to learn
and apply these skills than current teachers. In-service teachers find themselves lacking
the time to practice stress management and self-care techniques due to busy schedules
and high demands from work and home.
Population and Sample
Sampling
This study’s population consisted of student teachers, or teacher candidates in the
later phase, in student teaching from Texas Tech University’s College of Education in
Lubbock, Texas. Student teachers were in their first or second semester of student
teaching. The participants were in their last year of Texas Tech’s teacher preparation
program. The researcher or research assistant went to 4-6 site supervisors’ classrooms for
recruitment in the College of Education. The researcher or research assistant explained
the study and asked students if they were willing to participate. They were then asked to
sign an informed consent, and write their name and email address on a pre-numbered
notecard. The researcher or research assistant collected the informed consents and
notecards. Notecards with participants’ names and email addresses were divided using a
random number generator into two groups: the control group and experimental group.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
8
Adults between the ages of 18-50 were included. There was a mix of male and female
participants, including different ethnicities, socioeconomic status, and cultures in the
control and experimental groups. If participants did not wish to participate in the study or
training, they were asked to go back to their site supervisor’s classroom.
Treatment
The treatment consisted of one session that utilized Maslach’s Model of Burnout,
Hettler’s independent model of wellness, and the self construct-self efficacy. This one
session pre-post control experimental group design began with the administration of the
pretest and was followed by a stress training for the experimental group. This stress
training was 60 minutes and participants were asked to partake in various activities about
self-care and stress management. The training ended with the administration of the
posttest.
Site Supervisor Curriculum: The Control Group.
The control group participants were with their site supervisors learning about a
topic unrelated to the experimental group training. Site supervisors from the teacher
preparation program decided on what topic to teach their students. Participants were
given a pretest before class started and posttest after class was dismissed.
Theoretical Framework
Model of Burnout
Maslach’s Model of Burnout described three phases a person experiences due to
job stress: stress, strain, and burnout (Gil-Monte, Peiró, & Valcárcel, 1998). This model
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
9
viewed the burnout syndrome as a response from job stress and strain. Maslach and
Jackson defined burnout by using three constructs: emotional exhaustion,
depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (Maslach et al., 1996). In Maslach’s
Model of Burnout, stress, strain, and coping strategies were connected with emotional
exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal accomplishment (Gil-Monte et al.,
1998; Lee & Ashforth, 1990; Cox, Kuk, & Leiter, 1993). One theory that agreed with
Maslach’s research on stress, strain, and burnout was Osipow’s occupational stress
theory. This theory measured three key dimensions: occupational stress, psychological
strain, and coping resources. Maslach’s model and Osipow’s occupational stress theory
provided a theoretical framework and justification for use of the OSI-R, which measured
if student teachers experienced a change within the personal strain and personal resources
domains. The Stress Overload Scale was also used to measure factors related to stress.
Wellness Model
Hettler’s interdependent model of wellness provided six dimensions to help
student teachers become aware of their personal well-being. Each dimension is related to
shape each individual’s overall wellness. The six dimensions included were spiritual,
intellectual/mental, emotional, physical, social, and occupational (Hettler, 1976). This
model divided wellness into six areas and provided an appropriate framework when
creating a stress training for stress and self-care. Techniques from Solution Focused Brief
Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Relaxation Therapy were used to
support pre-service teachers and develop their stress management and self-care skills.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
10
Self-Construct: Self-Efficacy
Multiple constructs were considered when looking at self-constructs. Crews noted
self-beliefs included self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-concept, and the universal self
(Crews, 2006). Generally, the construct self-efficacy looked at the belief or level of
confidence people had in their abilities. Carey and Forsyth noted self-efficacy “reflects
confidence in the ability to exert control over one’s own motivation, behavior, and social
environment” (Carey & Forsyth, 2015). One of the additional outcomes of this study’s
training with student teachers was an increase in their self-efficacy levels. This was done
through teaching and training student teachers how to handle stress and improve their
self-care behaviors. The Teachers’ Sense Efficacy Scale 1 was used to measure whether
student teachers’ self-efficacy increased or decreased from the training compared to the
control group.
Instrumentation
This dissertation looked at student teachers’ knowledge, understanding, and
application of stress management and self-care skills as a result of a training and assessed
by the use of three different instruments. These instruments included the Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R). It also measured student teachers self-efficacy through
the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (TSES) and stress overload through the Stress
Overload Scale (SOS). The OSI-R gathered data from student teachers through Osipow’s
Personal Strain Questionnaire and Personal Resources Questionnaire. The Personal
Strain Questionnaire included the following sub-scales: vocational strain, psychological
strain, interpersonal strain, and physical strain. These focused on whether an individual
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
11
was having problems vocationally, psychologically/emotionally, relationally, and
physically. The Personal Resources Questionnaire included the following sub-scales:
recreation, self-care, social support, and rational/cognitive coping. This measured if an
individual was involved in recreational activities, personal activities, had community
support or help, and if they had cognitive skills to help cope with stress at work. The
Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 measured individuals’ self-efficacy by looking at
their efficacy in student engagement, instructional practices, and classroom management
(Duffin, French, & Patrick, 2012). This assessment was also used with in-service
teachers, but had been a part of other studies with student teachers. The Stress Overload
Scale looked at two factors that caused overload: personal vulnerability and event load
(Amrikhan, 2012). Each instrument used in this study provided valuable data for future
researchers studying student teachers and in-service teachers.
Data Collection and Analysis
Structure of Experimental and Control Groups
There was one experimental group and one control group for the study. The
control group’s participants remained in class with their site supervisor, while the
experimental group received a stress training. Training for the experimental group was 60
minutes, while the control group’s participants were with their site supervisor for the
same amount of time. The researcher conducted the experimental group’s training, while
control group participants were lead by their site supervisors. The ideal sample size for
the control group and experimental group was 35 participants each (N=70).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
12
Data was collected before and after the stress training for both groups. Data was
analyzed by running a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and additional
follow up statistics to test the four hypotheses.
Delimitations
1. All participants were student teachers selected from a university within one rural
area in Texas. While results may not be generalizable to populations outside this
group, this delimitation allowed researcher to be conducted on a previously
overlooked group in the literature.
2. The Occupational Roles Questionnaire was not included in this study.
Participants were still in training and scores for this measure would not have been
found reliable.
3. Participants volunteered to be a part of the study, and data was only used from
participants who offered to give the researcher permission to use their
information.
Limitations
1. Because of the time limit and availability of participants, this training was
compressed to fit into a single 60-minute presentation. Techniques used in
previous research studies were done over multiple sessions.
2. Because this study involved student teachers from one single university, it is
unclear if the results will be generalizable to other populations. Additional studies
should be conducted in order to generalize results of this study.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
13
3. This study was in a large group setting; therefore, future studies conducted in
smaller groups (classroom size) will be necessary in order to generalize results to
smaller group settings.
Definitions of Key Terms
The following definitions were offered to clarify terminology used in this
dissertation:
Burnout: “A condition of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal
accomplishment that can occur among individuals who work with people in some
capacity” (Maslach et al., 1996).
Mentor Teacher (MT): “The P-12 classroom teachers in the partner school district who
have agreed to have a Teacher Candidate in their classroom” (Texas Tech University
Tech Teach, 2015, p.iii).
Occupational stress: stress originating or caused by one’s work environment (Osipow,
1998).
Self-Care: “Regular activities an individual engages in which reduce or alleviate chronic
stress” (Osipow, 1998).
Self-Efficacy: “An individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors
necessary to produce specific performance attainments” (Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying
theory of behavioral change, as cited in Carey & Forsyth, 2015)
Site Coordinator (SC): “TTU faculty member assigned to supervise, coach, and evaluate
Teacher Candidates during the student-teaching placement. Site Coordinators are trained
and certified by the National Institute for Excellence in Teaching on administration of the
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
14
TAP rubric. Site Coordinators function as links between schools, school districts, and the
university program” (Texas Tech University Tech Teach, 2015, p. iv).
Strain: “When stress starts interfering with your ability to live a normal life for an
extended period” (American Psychological Association, 2013); “the result of chronic
stress” (Gold & Roth, 1993).
Stress: “A perceived, substantial imbalance between demand and response capability,
under conditions where failure to meet the demand has important, perceived
consequences” (McGrath, 1970).
Stress awareness: Being knowledgeable about the factors that can cause someone bodily
or mental tension.
Stress management: A program or technique used to help one manage emotional,
physical, intellectual, spiritual, social, or occupational stress.
Stress overload: Occurs when demands overwhelm resources; excessive stress
(Amirkhan, 2012; Lunney, 2006).
Stressors: Causes of stress.
Student teacher: A teacher candidate in their later phase of blocks or first/second
semester of student teaching.
Teacher or in-service teacher: An educator who is currently instructing students between
grade levels P-12.
Teacher Candidate (TC): “A student admitted into the teacher preparation program at
Texas Tech University. Teacher Candidates may be in an “early phase” consisting of
blocks or semesters that take place prior to the student teaching year; or in a “later phase”
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
15
consisting of blocks or semesters when they are completing the student-teaching year”
(Texas Tech University Tech Teach, 2015, p. iv).
Teacher self-efficacy: “The teacher’s belief in his or her capability to execute courses of
action required to successfully accomplish a specific teaching task in a particular context”
(Tschannen-Moran, Hoy & Hoy, 1998).
Teacher stress: “A physical, emotional, or mental reaction resulting from one’s response
to certain pressures in the environment and how well one can manage those pressures”
(Borg, Riding, & Falzon, 1991, p. 60).
Wellness: “An active process through which people become aware of, and make choices
toward, a more successful existence” (Hettler, 1976).
Basic Assumptions
For the purposes of this dissertation, the following assumptions were made:
1. Student teachers had experience in the classroom setting.
2. Student teachers passed their TExES General or Content exam.
3. Student teachers were under current supervision by university staff, a site
supervisor, and a mentor teacher.
4. Student teachers accurately filled out instrumentation.
Organization of the Study
The following study is organized beginning with an overview of the study in
chapter one and then a review of the literature in chapter two. Chapter three provides
information on the research methodology, following with the findings from this study in
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
16
chapter four. Chapter five closes the study with conclusions, discussions, and suggestions
for future research.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
17
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
Chapter II provides a general overview of teacher attrition and its effect on the
teaching profession. Specific terms are addressed concerning teacher attrition, including
stress, strain (chronic stress), and burnout (due to strain). Next, each term is explained
with regard to the teaching profession. The terms self-efficacy and teacher self-efficacy
are also discussed. School counselors and mental health counselors know teachers face
stressful situations on a daily basis. Unless stress is dealt with appropriately, stress can
lead to low self-efficacy and teacher burnout (Aloe, Amo, & Shanahan, 2014). This
review highlights the history of stress and counselors, history of stress as a problem for
teachers, and the ways society have tried to solve the issues that stress on teachers causes.
Several members in the community have the resources to help teacher’s stress levels.
Counselors are an integral part of helping teachers decrease stress levels, increase stress
awareness and self-care coping skills, and in turn see teachers have higher levels of self-
efficacy.
History of Stress and Counselors
Teachers on all levels (primary, middle, and secondary) experience stress
symptoms at some point during their time as educators (Curry & O'Brien, 2012; Fisher,
2011). The severity of symptoms might differ, meaning one may feel temporarily stressed
while another experiences chronic stress symptoms, also known as strain. Research has
been collected on teacher stress and burnout for decades, leading to where they are
now—new teachers are leaving the profession early in their career at an alarming rate.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
18
Research confirms school counselors, other faculty, and administrators are aware of this
issue, but may not know an effective way to change it (Pelsma, 2000; Stauffer & Mason,
2013). This dissertation is directly related to licensed professional counselors (LPCs) and
certified school counselors (CSCs) by offering or referring an alternative training or
program for professionals to use in order to help retain teachers and decrease teacher
stress and strain. In order to help this population with their overall wellness, community
leaders, such as Licensed Professional Counselors and Certified School Counselors, can
step up and become a helpful resource or referral agent to teachers.
Two valued sources urge LPCs and CSCs to make a priority to advocate not only
for their clients and students, but also for the good of society. According to the American
Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics (2014), LPCs should work to benefit
individuals and the community. It is a LPC’s responsibility to advocate for people if it
will improve their quality of life (American Counseling Association, 2014). This ethical
standard holds true for school counselors as well. School counselors have a responsibility
to develop professional relationships with faculty and staff if it is going to benefit their
students (American School Counselor Association, 2010). These ethical codes also
include school counselors working with community agencies, organizations, and
individuals; being competent in advocacy, collaborating, teamwork, program
coordination, and referring teachers for counseling (American School Counselor
Association, 2010). These sources are respected by both LPCs and CSCs as standards
that should be upheld by all members of the counseling profession.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
19
Counselors play a vital role in the community by advocating and collaborating
with one another to positively change society. Teachers have always been essential
members of society and will continue to be for decades to come. But, over the years
research has shown a problem with teachers leaving the profession. Various interventions
from LPCs and CSCs attempted to improve these attrition rates (Clemens, 2007;
Froeschle & Crews, 2010; Tatar, 2009). The role of these community leaders, LPCs and
CSCs, can drastically help this profession in a positive way if given the right tools and
opportunities.
Community Leaders: LPCs and CSCs
Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs) and Certified School Counselors
(CSCs) will play an important role with helping or referring teachers now and in the
future. LPCs and CSCs are two support groups that are able to help or refer this
population so they can manage stress and promote healthy decision making at work and
home. Counselors can work with teachers to design professional development
opportunities to help teachers meet their needs. Teachers can also talk with a LPC or get
a referral from a CSC about an issue before it escalates in the classroom or their personal
life. If teachers discuss issues with counselors early on, the problem may not escalate and
cause the teacher even more stress and increase their anxiety levels. Counselors can also
provide opportunities for teachers to support one another, whether inside or outside of the
classroom.
LPCs are able to see what a community needs inside and outside of a school
district. These professionals care about the community and are ethically required to
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
20
“work for the good of the individual and society by promoting mental health and well-
being” (American Counseling Association, 2014). CSCs understand what teachers are
experiencing inside the school and how those experiences can affect student outcomes.
CSCs are able to help teachers with student misbehavior, class scheduling, and multiple
other areas. School counselors can schedule professional development opportunities for
teachers to learn stress management and self-care strategies or contract out with a LPC to
lead trainings. CSCs must collaborate and advocate for the good of their teachers and
students (American School Counselor Association National Model, 2008). LPCs and
CSCs can help reduce stress and strain for student teachers and in-service teachers by
educating and teaching them stress management and self-care techniques. They can play
a role in decreasing burnout and teacher attrition rates on a community, state, and
national level.
CSCs and LPCs have been known to help teachers cope with stress throughout the
literature (Clemens, 2007; Froeschle & Crews, 2010; Tatar, 2009). Froeschle and Crews
(2010) describe a relaxation training conducted with teachers. They discovered teachers’
stress levels decreased after the intervention; teachers felt peace, restfulness, and control
afterwards (Froeschle & Crews, 2010). Tatar wrote an article on three ways teachers cope
with work: individual coping strategies, group-mediated coping strategies, and turning for
help (Tatar, 2009). Teachers were inclined to turn to school counselors, teacher
colleagues, psychologists, or principals for help, which in turn decreased their stress
levels and increased their support systems. Clemens recognized why teachers were
stressed out and used a model to help when consulting with teachers (Clemens, 2007).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
21
The use of this model supported teacher’s needs and provided a framework for school
counselors to help alleviate teacher stress. CSCs and LPCs are important pieces to the
puzzle when decreasing teacher’s stress levels. They can both be very useful to the
profession and provide immeasurable support to teachers.
Balancing Work and Stress
Stress is found in a multitude of areas, but for a teacher it can be found inside the
school. Teachers do a lot of behind-the-scenes work to prepare for their classes in order
to provide a healthy learning environment for students. Sometimes this preparation
includes taking assignments home to be graded or creating worksheets to help students
learn material better. Teachers also deal with confrontation on a daily basis, whether it is
with other faculty and staff members or students. They have to be ready to make choices
in the midst of chaos, even if they feel overwhelmed. Teachers also wear multiple hats
during the school day. For example, roles such as educator, disciplinarian, counselor, or
academic advisor are common. Clearly, teachers have many responsibilities and are
asked to multi-task every single day. It would be easy to slip into a lifestyle of unhealthy
habits with this kind of pressure. Teachers would likely benefit from the help a counselor
might offer for establishing a professional and personal balance.
University students also have a difficult time finding balance between being a
student and working. Some schools require students who want to become a teacher to
take basic coursework before applying to a teacher preparation program. After being
accepted, students are seen as teacher candidates and begin their block schedules. A
teacher candidate is a student admitted into a teacher preparation program at a university.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
22
Candidates can be in an early phase, which consists of blocks or semesters that take place
the year before student teaching. Then candidates move into the later phase that consists
of blocks or semesters when they are completing the student-teaching year (Texas Tech
University Tech Teach, 2015). Teacher candidates in the later phase must be present at a
school to help and learn from a mentor teacher. Mentor teachers are “P-12 classroom
teachers in the partner school district who have agreed to have a Teacher Candidate in
their classroom” (Texas Tech University Tech Teach, 2015, p. iii). Teacher Candidates
are also taking coursework throughout student teaching and are not able to hold jobs
during this time.
Student Teacher Background
Teacher candidates are students attending a university teacher preparation
program. During this program, students are required to take multiple courses geared
toward proficient teaching and the culmination of a successful future in the teaching
profession. Students must complete basic level coursework and then apply to get into a
teacher preparation program. After being accepted into the program, students start their
block program schedule. For this study, the university requires students to take a Pre
Admission exam, the TExES Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities TExES Content
or General grade level exam before they start student teaching. The General exam was
faded out in August 2015 and teacher candidates must now pass the TExES Content
exam. Finally, teacher candidates (in the later phase) spend an academic year co-teaching
with a mentor teacher (Texas Tech University Tech Teach, 2015). The literature also
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
23
refers to teacher candidates as pre-service teachers, or student teachers, learning from
mentor teachers during student teaching (Bates & Burbank, 2008; Jenkins, 2014).
Teacher preparation programs have a unique opportunity to educate students
accepted into their program on stress management, self-care, and self-efficacy. Programs
can take a preventative stance by instilling positive coping behaviors into students before
they step foot in a classroom or before they graduate from a program. Students can be
well equipped to handle stressors found in the teaching profession long before starting
their teaching career. In-service teachers find themselves too busy and overwhelmed to
focus on stress management skills, their personal self-care, and sense of self-efficacy.
Many experience stress overload or excessive stress with having to manage student
behavior; district, state, and national requirements; demanding schedules, etc. that they
are too exhausted to even comprehend new learning techniques taught through
professional development opportunities (Lunney, 2006). Learning and implementing
techniques becomes more of a stressor than an opportunity to gain coping skills.
Teaching these techniques and strategies to students accepted into a teacher preparation
program and continuing it throughout their career may become a beneficial option.
These techniques can be taught during undergraduate courses for basic
requirements and coursework for the teacher preparation program. Professors can also
integrate these skills into their curriculum instead of developing a course primarily for
wellness. It is important for teacher candidates to implement these skills during student
teaching so they can get an idea of how to apply them. School districts can then integrate
wellness into their new teacher programs and professional development opportunities to
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
24
promote long-term benefits. Stress training for this population has to start at the
beginning and continue throughout a teacher’s career in order to increase retention rates
(Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014, July).
Stress and Strain
Stress occurs when bodily tension is felt mentally and/or physically. Stressors are
causes of stress; they can occur for a variety of reasons ranging from a parent trying to
find a babysitter for their children to dealing with a loved one who was in a tragic
accident. If these stressors are not managed, then stress overload can occur, which will
lead to strain from the ongoing stress. Strain keeps an individual from living a normal life
(American Psychological Association, 2013) and can lead to multiple illnesses and
diseases. One’s job or occupation can be the cause of multiple stressors or strain.
According to Osipow (1998), occupational stress is “stress originating or caused by one’s
work environment.” The Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition has been used to
measure occupational adjustment for several occupations. Among those occupations are
retail workers, military, office workers, supervisors, firefighters, and teachers (Alkhadher
& Al-Naser, 2006; Osipow, 1998).
Teachers experience varying levels of occupational stress and it can affect a
school district’s faculty, staff, and, most importantly, students. Teachers across the nation
may feel high levels of occupational stress because of district, state, and national
demands. This causes teachers to minimize their stressors and slip into unhealthy coping
habits. Some stressors for teachers include student misbehavior, inadequate
administrative support, heavy workloads, demanding schedules, lack of training, and low
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
25
salaries (Curtis, 2012; Dagli, 2012; Sass, Flores, Claeys, & Perez, 2012; Hartwick &
Kang, 2013; Ingersoll et al., 2014). Professionally, these stressors can lead to strain,
strain can lead to burnout, and burnout can lead to higher teacher attrition rates when
teachers leave the profession (Maslach et al., 1996). Personally, stressors can negatively
affect a teacher socially, emotionally, physically, mentally/intellectually, financially and
spiritually (Hettler, 1976)
History of Stress and Teachers
Teacher attrition has been recognized as a problem in the United States since the
1970’s (Sass, Flores et al., 2012). An immense amount of research has been done since
then, between 1988-2012. A Consortium for Policy Research in Education report
evaluated data over a 25-year period using the Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) with
available teachers between 1988-1989, 1991-1992, 1994-1995, 2000-2001, 2004-2005,
and 2008-2009 (Ingersoll et al., 2014). Information from 2011-2012 was also included in
the updated report. The report provided evidence stating first-year teacher attrition has
steadily increased since 1988-1989 and the trend is still continuing. Figure 1 shows a
graph of first-year teacher attrition annual percentages between particular years.
According to Figure I, in the 2000-2001 school year teacher attrition had the highest
percentage for 1st-year teachers when compared to five other school years. It decreased in
the 2004-2005 school year by 2.7 percent, but increased by 1.2 percent in the 2008-2009
school year. Teacher attrition has been fluctuating since 1988, but seems to be rising
significantly according to Figure I. Attrition has been an issue with teachers for decades
and the turnover rate doesn’t seem to be slowing down anytime soon.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
26
Figure 1: Percent Annual 1st-Year Teacher Attrition, 1988-98 and 2008-09
Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force (RR-80).
The Alliance for Excellent Education states, “Since the mid-1980’s the significant
expansion of the teaching workforce has been accompanied by increased turnover among
beginning teachers” (2014, July). The report also claims attrition rates have only
increased over the past two decades for first-year teachers and experience levels from
model teachers have gone from around 15 years of experience in 1987-1988 to 5 years of
experience in 2011-2012 (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014, July). Figure 2 shows a
graph with the number of teachers and ages for 1987-1988, 2007-2008, and 2011-2012.
According to Figure 2, there are a higher number of younger teachers than older ones in
2011-2012, which may not be a good sign because almost half of new teachers leave the
profession within five years. According to Curtis (2012), young, new teachers have a
higher attrition rate than older, more experienced ones. Whatever the case, old and new
teachers are continuing to leave or move each year and stress may be one of the main
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
27
sources for these actions. Kipps-Vaughan’s study found that teacher stress is linked to
absenteeism, turnover, and early retirement (2013). It is important for researchers to
understand the causes of teacher stress before fully comprehending the teacher attrition
problem.
Figure 2: Age of School Teachers, 1987, 2007, and 2011
Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force (RR-80).
Causes of the Stress Problem
There are multiple reasons teachers are leaving the profession in the United
States. The most common reason is pressure from testing (Pas, Bradshaw, Hershfeldt, &
Leaf, 2010; Tye & O’Brien, 2002). Since the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act,
which required students to be tested in reading and math every year from third to eighth
grade then once again in high school (Edwards, 2015), teachers have felt stressed about
students’ scores and job security (Hartwick & Kang, 2013). Teachers at higher-risk
schools feel this stress and are even more likely to leave due to testing, lack of resources,
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
28
workload stressors, and issues regarding student populations (Dagli, 2012; Sass et al.,
2012). The profession faces numerous reasons for teachers leaving; several include job
satisfaction, administration, environment, and problems with students.
Teachers who leave have reported feeling dissatisfied with their job (Hartwick &
Kang, 2013) and the lack of administrative support (Curtis, 2012). Others felt unease
about the work environment (Dagli, 2012) and lack of student motivation (Curtis, 2012).
The CPRE report cites the most frequent reasons for leaving: school and working
conditions (isolation), low salaries, classroom resources, student misbehavior,
accountability, development opportunities, input into decision making, and school
leadership (Ingersoll et al., 2014). Many of these causes have been mentioned in literature
on an international level.
Teachers are leaving the profession in the United States and multiple other
countries around the world due to stress-related causes. Countries such as Australia
(Buchanan, 2012), Belgium (Struyven & Vanthournout, 2014), Canada (Vesely,
Saklofske, & Nordstokke, 2014), China (Leung, Chiang, Chui, & Wong, 2011), Italy
(Zurlo, Pes, & Cooper, 2007) and numerous others are facing similar challenges, which
could lead to teacher burnout or more severe issues, such as anxiety or depression. The
gravity of this problem is apparent and is affecting several people in other countries, but
for this study we are focusing primarily on the United States.
A recent press release stated, “Roughly half a million U.S. teachers either move or
leave the profession each year—attrition that costs the United States up to $2.2 billion
annually” (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014). Perda (2013) found between 1993-
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
29
2003 more than 41% of new teachers left the profession within five years of entry.
Ingersoll, Merrill, and Stuckey created a graph (see Figure 3) based off information from
Perda. Figure 3 shows the graph displaying cumulative percent attrition of beginning
teachers by years of experience (Ingersoll et al., 2014; Perda, 2013). Perda’s data,
displayed in Figure 3, was based off teaching spells; spells can include multiple teaching
jobs as long as the time between jobs does not exceed three months. Between 1993-2003,
11.9 percent of beginning teachers had a teaching spell less than a year; 23 percent had a
teaching spell less than two years, 28.4 percent less than 3 years, 36.8 percent less than 4
years, and 41.3 percent less than 5 years. This suggests the more experience a beginning
teacher has, the higher the attrition rates are going to be. This issue hurts the economy on
a financial level and threatens the educational quality of teaching for students. The
teaching profession, counselors, communities, individual states, and nation suffer
significantly on a financial, personal, and professional level.
Figure 3: Cumulative Percent Attrition of Beginning Teachers by Years of Experience, 1993-2003
Perda, D. (2013). Transitions into and out of teaching: A longitudinal analysis of early career teacher turnover (doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
30
Teacher attrition causes a concern in the teaching profession, because if teachers
are not willing to stay then schools may not be staffed with quality educators (Allen,
2005). This can keep students from receiving an equal education opportunity and
possibly leave them learning from teachers who are uncertified and on emergency
waivers (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014). For example, math, science and special
education teachers leave the field more frequently compared to other teachers (Brown &
Wynn, 2007), which may cause schools to quickly hire teachers uncertified in these
subject areas.
In addition to the teaching profession, CSCs and LPCs are also being impacted by
teacher attrition. School counselors work with students, staff, and administrators to make
schools run efficiently. School counselors wear a variety of different hats in order to
benefit the overall school environment. A few ways counselors help the school
environment are by supporting students academically and emotionally; assisting teachers
and other staff members; and working with administrators on standardized testing
(American School Counselor Association, 2010). School counselors are constantly
juggling multiple roles throughout the day. If teacher attrition is high, school counselors’
workload increases due to teachers leaving and new teachers being hired. This means
school counselors may have less time to work with students on academics and developing
life skills. Students may graduate without learning critical life skills and healthy coping
mechanisms. This may lead to LPCs getting an influx of adolescents and adults that have
higher levels of depression, anxiety, unemployment, and relationship issues.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
31
Communities, individual states, and the nation feel effects from adolescents, with
or without a high school degree, who are unprepared to face world problems. This may
be evidenced by an increase in crime rates and health costs due to inadequate education
(Rebell, 2012). Clearly, teacher attrition is a significant issue that impacts not only the
individual but the nation as well. In order to address this problem, we must look at what
kind of professional development training, stress management programs, and self-care
skills have been available for teachers. Teachers should be given opportunities
throughout the year to help with symptoms of stress so they can be well equipped to cope
with the stress related to teaching. The district and school administrators should support
teachers and want them to seek continuing education related to teaching.
Society, Teachers, and Stress
District officials or a school’s administration often caters professional
development training depending on each district or school’s needs. The state of Texas
offers professional development online through a website called Project Share
(http://projectsharetexas.org/). Teachers can visit this website and search for a specific
subject and age/course. Subjects include: English Language Arts and Reading,
Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies. Select grades range from kindergarten to eight
grade; courses vary depending upon the subject chosen. Most districts only require
teachers to attend professional development trainings a few times throughout the year.
Some of those days are used for standardized test training. Usually, teachers must sign up
for additional training programs in order to further their education. The only other
opportunity they have during school is to consult with teachers and faculty during their
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
32
planning period. Training regarding self-efficacy, self-care, and stress awareness is not
taught during professional development days unless the district decides to include it into
professional development or teacher in-service times.
Outside of professional development, teachers can learn during teacher in-service,
continuing education opportunities, taking their own initiative to be educated or by going
back to school. Teachers are required to attend in-service times throughout the year, but
they do not get to choose what topics will be covered during training. They do get to
choose how to earn their continuing education hours. Each state requires teachers to earn
a specific number of continuing education hours. This study focuses on the state of Texas
for this information. According to the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website,
classroom teachers are required to earn 150 Continuing Professional Education (CPE)
hours and those who hold a professional certificate must earn 200 CPE hours in order to
renew their standard certificate. This certificate must be renewed in Texas every five
years. The Texas Administration Code has a set rule (232.11) about the number and
content required for these hours. This website includes a list of topics for professional
development; CPE hours; professional ethics and standards of conduct; and content area
knowledge and skill (Texas Administration Code, 2012).
In Texas, the only mention of health-related education for teachers is listed at the
bottom of this website. According to the Texas Administration Code, “(g) An educator
may fulfill up to 12 clock-hours of required CPE activities by participating in a mental
health first aid training program offered by a local mental health authority under the
Texas Health and Safety Code, 1001.203” (Texas Administration Code, 2014). There was
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
33
no mention in the rule of self-care, stress awareness/management, or self-efficacy.
Teachers are not required to seek out education for themselves regarding these topics
unless they choose them for CPE hours.
Teachers can choose to educate themselves about specific topics outside of school
by attending trainings, workshops, seminars, or going back to school to earn a post-
bachelor/graduate degree. These outside educational opportunities can include an array of
topics addressing areas that would benefit someone in the profession. Content taught
during a teaching preparation program might also include topics not listed in the Texas
Administration Code rule 232.11, which is dependent upon each school and program.
Teacher Preparation Programs
After searching for teacher preparation programs and ways they are addressing
self-care and stress awareness, the researcher found only two studies. In 2000, a study
was published on teacher preparation programs changing their curriculum to better
prepare candidates on what to expect in the classroom (Wilkins-Canter, Edwards, &
Young, 2000). The authors discussed changes that were being made to decrease attrition
rates and meet the psychological and personal needs of novice teachers at this particular
university. Professional development workshops for novice teachers were developed
during this study to address self-care, stress awareness and stress management. Yacapsin
(2010), a pre-service teacher supervisor, wrote an article about including self-care
practices within the school’s teacher preparation program. Their program was changed to
include reflective practice and bi-monthly group counseling sessions (Yacapsin, 2010).
This part of the program focused on alleviating stress for pre-service teachers and
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
34
promoting self-care practices. An additional author mentioned in Yacapsin’s article
discussed the importance of including stress management and self-care techniques into
teacher preparation programs, but did not provide a study or data for how they
implemented such practices.
Brown and Nagel (2004) wrote an article about the need to prepare future teachers
on how to handle stress. The authors included a definition of stress, sources and
predictors of stress, mediators of stress, and teacher preparation program responses
(Brown & Nagel, 2004). Within these responses, suggestions were made as to how stress
management could be taught to future teachers. Benefits of creating a course dedicated to
this health issue or integrating techniques into current curriculum were encouraged.
Outside of the United States, Canada has discussed the need for developing these courses
into teacher preparation programs, too (Harris, 2011).
A research study was conducted in Canada to see which universities and colleges
offered teacher preparation programs; then each university and college was examined to
discover which programs included a course on individual stress management (Harris,
2011). Few courses were found through course descriptions related to stress management.
The author developed potential course topics and assignments for future use, but only
provided suggestions and no actual training. According to research, few colleges or
universities have included a stress awareness, stress management, or self-care component
into their teacher preparation programs. There are some studies in the literature that
focus primarily on teaching pre-service teachers about stress, self-care and overall
wellness rather than only stress awareness and stress management.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
35
Role of Counseling
Relevant Theories to the Field of Counseling
Literature has shown for decades how essential it is for people to acquire healthy
coping skills in order to decrease stress levels, increase self-efficacy, and attain holistic
wellness. Studies focused on educating in-service teachers on stress management or relief
through the use of cognitive behavioral therapy, rational emotive behavior therapy,
mindfulness, and relaxation therapy (Forman, 1990; Gold et al., 2010; Kaspereen, 2012;
Leung., 2011; Shimazu, Okada, Sakamoto, & Miura, 2003). Solution Focused Brief
Therapy has been used as a framework for programs to help teachers manage their
classroom by improving student behavior and relationships (Brown, Powell, & Clark,
2012; Metcalf, 2008), which can decrease teacher’s stress levels in the classroom.
However, few research studies have looked at preparing student teachers on managing
stress and personal wellness through a training.
Harris (2011) created an individual stress management coursework for teacher
preparation programs after researching universities to see if they offered some type of
stress management education courses (Harris, 2011). She was unable to find universities
that emphasized stress management fifty percent or more of the class time. Some
professors have incorporated stress alleviating activities into their curriculum through
journaling, modeling, talking with second-year teacher candidates, collaborative teaching,
classroom management techniques, simulation lessons, debriefing, and non-threatening
evaluation procedures (Wadlington, 1998). But overall, literature related to student
teachers coping with stress is limited. Studies exist that focus on emotional intelligence
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
36
and pre-service teacher well-being (Vesely, Saklofske, & Nordstokke, 2014), but few
programs are known dealing specifically with stress and holistic wellness. The training
created and used in this study is developed from Maslach’s Model of Burnout, Osipow’s
theory of occupational stress, Hettler’s Six Dimensions of Wellness, and the self
construct: self-efficacy. The stress training incorporates techniques from Solution
Focused Brief Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and Relaxation Therapy.
Maslach’s Model of Burnout is a main part of the theoretical framework for this study.
Maslach’s Model of Burnout
Christina Maslach created the proposed model and it is seen as the “most widely
used and accepted theoretical model of burnout” (Gates & Wolverton, 2002). It is
composed of three key constructs: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP),
and personal accomplishment (PA); it also includes three phases: stress, strain, and
burnout (Gil-Monte et al., 1998; Maslach et al., 1996). These three constructs outline how
the model connects to the instrument used for this study and treatment modality. The
model focuses on the phases a person goes through because of job stress; stress to strain
to burnout (Gil-Monte et al., 1998). Other studies on burnout found that lack of PA and
EE are a type of strain and DP is a coping strategy (Cox, Kuk, & Leiter, 1993; Gil-Monte
et al., 1998; Lee & Ashforth, 1990). In Maslach’s model, a connection is made between
the three phases and three constructs (Gil-Monte, Peiró, & Valcárcel, 1998; Leiter &
Maslach, 1988). Lack of PA is seen as a stress and strain and it takes place before
depersonalization; stress occurs before depersonalization when other coping strategies do
not work (Gil-Monte et al., 1998). When a tense situation arises, a person may start to
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
37
feel stress, he or she may try to use coping skills to decrease stress levels. When these
coping skills fail (lack of PA), it can lead to strain, which leads to depersonalization.
Depersonalization is a type of coping strategy when a person cannot cope in a healthy
way. Lack of PA can lead to emotional exhaustion, which is seen as a strain. Emotional
exhaustion also occurs when an individual is unable to cope effectively, and this
exhaustion connects to DP as a coping mechanism (Gil-Monte et al., 1998). One theory
that agrees with Maslach’s research on stress, strain, and burnout is Osipow’s
Occupational Stress theory.
Osipow’s Theory of Occupational Stress
This theory was developed in 1981 with the Occupational Stress Inventory (OSI)
and the inventory was revised in 1998, and then renamed the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised (OSI-R) (Osipow & Spokane, 1981, 1998). This inventory measures
three dimensions: occupational stress, psychological strain, and coping resources. It
scores 14 different scales total; six in occupational stress, four in psychological strain,
and four in coping resources.
The Occupational Role Questionnaire (ORQ) measures occupational stress with the
following sub-scales: role overload (RO), role insufficiency (RI), role ambiguity (RA),
role boundary (RB), responsibility (R), and physical environment (PE). This scale will
not be used as a measure during this study because it focuses on people who are currently
in a working role. These student teachers are preparing to become teachers; therefore this
questionnaire would not be pertinent for them to take at this point. The following
domains/scales will be used to measure pre-service teachers psychological strain and
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
38
coping resources in this study.
The Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) measures psychological strain with the
subscales vocational strain (VS), psychological strain (PSY), interpersonal strain (IS),
and physical strain (PS). Vocational strain measures the attitude and problems individuals
experience through their work quality or output (Osipow, 1998). Psychological strain
measures the psychological and/or emotional problems; interpersonal strain measures
disruption in personal relationships; physical strain measures complaints about physical
illness and/or self-care habits (Osipow, 1998). The last domain/scale looks at coping
resources by using four subscales.
The Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ) measures coping resources through
the following subscales: recreation (RE), self-care (SC), social support (SS) and
rational/cognitive coping (RC). Recreation measures how a person gets pleasure and
relaxation from routine recreational activities (Osipow, 1998). The OSI-R subscale self-
care provides the definition used within this study and measures how an individual
reduces or alleviates stress through personal activities (Osipow, 1998). According to the
OSI-R manual, social support measures if the individual feels support through
relationships; rational/cognitive coping looks to see if an individual possesses and uses
cognitive skills to cope with stress at work (Osipow, 1998). The two OSI-R domains and
eight subscales are connected to this study’s treatment model by categorizing them into
one of the six dimensions of wellness.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
39
Wellness Training: The Experimental Group
Bill Hettler created an interdependent wellness model in 1976 called the Six
Dimensions of Wellness. Dr. Hettler is the co-founder of the National Wellness Institute
(NWI), which helps provide a definition of the term wellness used throughout this study.
According to Hettler and the NWI, wellness is defined as “an active process through
which people become aware of, and make choices toward, a more successful existence”
(Hettler, 1976). There are six dimensions to this model: spiritual, intellectual/mental,
emotional, social, physical, and occupational. It is also a holistic model that focuses on
helping an individual see the interconnectedness of each dimension. Hettler’s model
(1976) explains the following:
1. How a person contributes to his or her environment and community, and
how to build better living spaces and social networks.
2. The enrichment of life through work, and its interconnectedness to living
and playing.
3. The development of belief systems, values, and creating a world-view.
4. The benefits of regular physical activity, healthy eating habits, strength and
vitality as well as personal responsibility, self-care and when to seek
medical attention.
5. Self-esteem, self-control, and determination as a sense of direction.
6. Creative and stimulating mental activities, and sharing your gifts with
others.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
40
Each dimension is important and helps create and develop a person’s overall
wellness. The six dimensions provide a framework and examine how wellness may
contribute to proper self-care and stress prevention. The six dimensions and their
definitions are provided in Table 1.
Table 1: Six Dimensions of Wellness
Dimension Definition Spiritual Search for meaning and purpose in human existence Intellectual/Mental One’s creative, stimulating mental activities Emotional Awareness and acceptance of one’s feelings Social Awareness of ways one contributes to their environment and community Physical The need for regular physical activity Occupational Personal satisfaction and enrichment in one’s life through work
Hettler, B. (1976). The Six Dimensions of Wellness Model handout. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nationalwellness.org/resource/resmgr/docs/ sixdimensionsfactsheet.pdf
Hettler’s dimensions are used to categorize Osipow’s personal strain and personal
resources domains/scales and their individual subscales with the OSI-R. Many of these
subscales can be categorized in multiple dimensions. For example within the PSQ, VS
can fit into Hettler’s occupational and emotional dimensions. There will be many
overlaps between each subscale and dimension, which provides a strong theoretical
framework for this study’s treatment. PSY is connected with the emotional,
intellectual/mental, and spiritual domains; IS to the social and intellectual/mental
domains; PHY to Hettler’s physical domain. The PRQ’s subscales are RE, SC, SS, and
RC; they will also overlap into multiple dimensions. RE connects to the physical and
social domains; SC to the social, intellectual/mental, emotional and spiritual; SS to the
social and occupational; RC to the intellectual/mental, emotional, and spiritual domains
located in the handout (Hettler, 1976). The wellness model developed by Hettler
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
41
provides a framework for this study’s training and connects Osipow’s Occupational
Stress theory to wellness. Techniques were chosen from various theories supported by
research, which were previously used in other studies to help individuals manage stress.
Wellness: Theories and Techniques
Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) has been used to help teachers manage
classroom activities and student behavior (Brown, Powell, & Clark, 2012; Metcalf,
2008). SFBT focuses on solutions rather than problem solving (Molnar & De Shazer,
1987; Corey, 2009). This therapy allows clients to create and choose their own goals; it
does not look at the history of a problem or a diagnosis. The SFBT technique used in this
study is based off the Six Dimensions of Wellness. Participants will write down what
actions they are taking in each dimension that contributes to their overall wellness. Then
participants will write down what goals they want to accomplish in the future and create a
specific plan to accomplish those goals. Other therapies are used within the treatment to
help participants manage stress, including Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy.
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) is a form of Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT) and both have been used in multiple research studies (Forman, 1990;
Leung et al., 2011). Aaron Beck’s CBT combines cognitive and behavioral standards and
methods in a brief treatment approach (Corey, 2009). It focuses on the client being aware
of thoughts and emotions by recognizing how circumstances, thoughts, and behaviors
influence emotions. REBT was created by Albert Ellis and is one of the initial cognitive
behavior therapies (Corey, 2009; Ellis, 2001). This therapy uses the ABC model shown in
Figure 4 to determine whether a person has rational or irrational beliefs.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
42
Figure 4: ABC Model
Corey, G. (2009). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (eighth edition). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
This study uses the R technique as a tool to help participants handle difficult
situations inside and outside of the classroom. It focuses on steps to take when a conflict
arises by using the three r’s: retreat, rethink, and react/respond. Participants are able to
slow down by retreating/relaxing away from the situation then rethinking about what
occurred before taking any action. The last techniques used in the treatment are from
Relaxation Therapy.
Relaxation Therapy (RT) or relaxation training is used to decrease participant’s
stress response by releasing muscle tension and providing mental relaxation (Corey,
2009). Relaxation techniques have been used in many research studies (Kaspereen, 2012;
Shimazu et al., 2003). Some techniques included in this therapy are mindfulness (Gold et
al., 2010), breathing exercises, progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, systematic
desensitization, assertion training, biofeedback-induced relaxation, hypnosis, and
autogenic training (Corey, 2009). This treatment will use the following relaxation
techniques: breathing, progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), and guided imagery (GI).
Breathing techniques allow a person to control the flow of oxygen that enters and
leaves his or her body. Participants learn how to take deep breaths and equalize their
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
43
breathing through two simple techniques (Varvogli & Darviri, 2011). The second
relaxation therapy technique is called Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR). It reduces
stress and anxiety by alternately tensing and relaxing the muscles (Varvogli & Darviri,
2011). PMR teaches a person how to become aware of muscle tension and provides a
method to relax each muscle group. The final technique, Guided Imagery, is explained by
a counselor or professional through the use of an audio or written script. It uses stress
reduction and breathing techniques to relax an individual through his or her senses. By
incorporating each therapy and their associated techniques into a person’s daily routine,
an individual may notice a positive change in how he or she handles conflict, deals with
stress, and an increase in his or her overall wellness. Another outcome of applying these
techniques into a person’s life is an increase in a person’s sense of self-efficacy.
Self-Construct: Self-Efficacy
Albert Bandura included the term self-efficacy in his Social Learning Theory,
which is now called the Social Cognitive Theory. Self-efficacy is defined as “an
individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce
specific performance attainments” (Bandura, 1977, 1986, 1997; Carey & Forsyth, 2015).
An increase in a person’s self-efficacy levels may be one natural outcome from using this
study’s stress training. The training may cause an increase in teacher retention rates and
address issues related to pre-service teacher’s confidence levels.
Components and Rationale of Treatment
The proposed models and construct regarding stress, wellness, and self-efficacy
are supported in theory. Several theories are integrated within each model and construct
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
44
in order to form a balanced foundation for this study’s treatment design. Two models and
one construct are used for this theoretical approach, including Maslach’s alternative
model of burnout, Six Dimensions of Wellness Model, and the self-construct: self-
efficacy. Maslach’s Model of Burnout focuses on three key parts, which outlines how the
model connects to the OSI-R and treatment modality.
Solution Focused Brief Therapy, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, and
Relaxation Therapy techniques were used during the stress training. The delivery of these
techniques was influenced by Kolb’s cycle of experiential learning (2015). Research
stated this learning theory was beneficial for teaching students in higher education
(Healey & Jenkins, 2000). The cycle included the following elements: concrete
experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active
experimentation. Experiential learning was known to help participants increase
knowledge, understanding, and his or her ability to apply what was learned (Kolb, 2015).
During the stress training, participants were taught the material, walked through an
activity for each technique, asked to process what was learned, and then shown how to
apply it in a real life situation. The goal was to follow the framework Kohl provided
through his experiential learning theory.
Ethical Issues
According to the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics (2014),
counselors are to “plan, design, conduct, and report research in a manner that is
consistent with pertinent ethical principles, federal and state laws, host institutional
regulations, and scientific standards regarding research” (p. 15). This includes
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
45
confidentiality, precautions to avoid injury, explaining a research participants rights, and
managing and maintaining boundaries with participants. Researchers must explain the
purpose of the study and provide participants with a clear understanding of the study’s
process. Participants must know how the researcher plans to keep participants’ personal
information and instrument data confidential. The researcher must also take precautions
to keep all participants from experiencing any type of harm. Participants will be aware of
their rights by reading the informed consent. Because students are involved in this study,
an explanation will be provided that their participation in this research will not affect
their academic standing in any way. Lastly, it is the researcher’s responsibility to manage
and maintain appropriate boundaries with research participants by creating and
implementing preventative measures prior to the study. University faculty and staff have
approved this research study before it was sent to the Institutional Review Board for
further approval. IRB approval was granted on October 11, 2015 and the project number
is 505419.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
46
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Overview
The study investigated student teachers’ overall wellness, the independent
variable, by examining the effectiveness of a stress training on the following four
dependent variables for student teachers: overall score of psychological strain, coping
resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload. This chapter describes the methods used to
investigate hypotheses in this study. The study design as outlined below includes the null
hypotheses, setting, participants, materials, instrumentation, design, data collection
procedure and analysis.
The researcher used two domains/scales from the OSI-R: PSQ and PRQ, the TSES
(short form), and SOS. IBM SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis (IBM Corp, 2013).
Descriptive statistics were reported for the following demographic variables: age, gender,
ethnicity, education, relationship status, number of children, teaching certification level,
GPA, block, and type of school the student is placed at for student teaching. An
experimental design of pretest, treatment, and posttest was conducted within the setting
of Texas Tech University’s College of Education. Teacher candidates student-teach for a
full academic year within Texas Tech’s teacher preparation program. They also attended
regular professional development on campus with their site supervisor, which was where
the training was conducted.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
47
Hypotheses
1. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group with regards to psychological strain as measured by the Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire.
2. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group in regard to coping resources as measured by the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ).
3. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in teacher self-efficacy as
measured by the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form).
4. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in stress overload as
measured by the Stress Overload Scale (SOS).
Setting
The study took place in the College of Education at Texas Tech University in
Lubbock, Texas (see Figure 5). The student Co-PI or a researcher assistant visited 4-6 site
supervisors’ classrooms for recruitment in the College of Education (see Figure 6).
During recruitment student teachers who volunteered to be a part of the study signed the
informed consent then wrote their name and email address on a pre-numbered notecard.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
48
They were instructed to place the informed consent and notecard back into their envelope
until the student Co-PI or research assistant collected the materials.
For the experiment, student teachers in the experimental group met in the large
lecture hall room-001 or classroom in the College of Education. Participants in the
experimental group and control group were given directions from the Student Co-PI
through a general information email and a reminder email to where the training or pretest
and posttest were located. Student teachers were informed of what room the training was
held. They went to this designated room on the day of training. Control group participants
attended their cluster meeting with their site supervisor. The large lecture hall room-001
had 10 round tables with 6 chairs at each table; the classroom had multiple tables and
chairs for a smaller group of students. Student teachers who did not want to participate in
the study or training went to their site supervisor’s classroom for their cluster meeting.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
49
Figure 5: Map Big- Lubbock, Texas
Seal-Nyman, K. (2015). Strong Regional Recruitment Strategy Key to Competing for Texas Students (map big). Retrieved from http://www.depts.ttu.edu/ communications/newsletter/images/07Mar/map_big.jpg
Figure 6: Tech is Best in West- College of Education
Post, S. (2009). Texas Tech Named A Best in the West College by the Princeton Review (Tech is the Best in West). Retrieved from http://today.ttu.edu/ posts/2009/08/princeton-review-tech-is-best-in-west
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
50
Participants
Each year universities accept new students into teacher preparation programs.
Students go through coursework, which prepared them for teaching, taking state exams,
and gaining experience in the classroom with Mentor Teachers (MT). Their last year of
school consisted of student teaching for a full academic year as student teachers. Student
teachers were required to assist Mentor Teachers for a certain amount of hours each week
and continued their program coursework (Block requirements). All teacher
candidates/student teachers at Texas Tech University attended professional development
during the 2015-2016 academic year. The researcher went to multiple classrooms to tell
students about this opportunity. The training took place in room 001 or a small meeting
room in the Education building at Texas Tech University from 3:00-4:30 PM on
November 4th and November 11th; an additional training was held from 4-5:30 PM on
November 19th.
Teacher candidates/student teachers who were willing to be a part of the study
were the sample. The computed sample (N=70) for this experimental study consisted of
two groups of student teachers, one control group (n=35) and one experimental group
(n=35). Three training days were available to the participants on November 4th,
November 11th, and November 19th. Demographically, the student teachers varied in age,
gender, ethnicity, education, relationship status, number of children, teaching certification
level, GPA, block, and type of school he/she was placed at for student teaching. Random
sampling was used to select subjects in order to ensure “each member of the population
from which the sample is drawn has an equal and known probability of being selected”
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
51
(Slavin, 2007). An ethical consideration for this study was data protection. All necessary
precautions were made in order to protect individual’s information. Records were stored
in a secure area with limited access. If it was feasible, all identifiable information was
changed. Informed consents were kept in a separate file from instrument data in a locked
filing cabinet. Data entered online was kept in password protected files on the
researcher’s personal computer. Identification codes were used instead of participant’s
names on each assessment and demographic survey. The notecards were permanently
discarded after the drawing for a $50.00 gift card.
Materials
During recruitment an envelope that contained a flyer, participant instructions,
gift-card information, a letter to participants, an informed consent form, and a notecard
were provided to student teachers. Student teachers who were willing to participate in the
study signed the informed consent then wrote their name and email address on the
notecard. A number was placed on each notecard prior to disseminating to student
teachers. Participants placed the informed consent and notecard back into the envelope.
The Student Co-PI or research assistant picked up their envelope from potential
participants.
A packet was provided to participants before the stress training began for the
pretest materials. Inside the packet was a copy of the instructions, a demographic survey,
Stress Overload Scale, Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form), Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised item booklet, Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised rating
sheet, and a loose copy of the OSI-R directions. The word “omit” was placed on a sticker
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
52
or written on the questionnaire participants did not fill out on the OSI-R rating sheet.
Participants were advised not to write on the OSI-R item booklet. The same packet was
provided after the training to participants for the posttest.
During training, the researcher used a PowerPoint presentation to guide
participants (See Appendix H). This stress training required a writing utensil, piece of
plain paper, and a Self-Care Survey document, which was provided for each participant
by the Student Co-PI. A piece of 2x2 butcher paper for each group and a pencil for each
participant were also provided for the training.
Instrumentation
The stress training utilized a pre-post control group experimental design.
Instruments were administered to all participants one time before and two times after
implementation of the stress training. The OSI-R-Personal Strain Questionnaire and
Personal Resources Questionnaire were used to measure participants’ pre and post
psychological strain and coping resources (Osipow, 1998). The Teachers’ Sense of
Efficacy Scale 1 was used to measure student teacher self-efficacy (Tschannen-Moran &
Hoy, 2001). The Stress Overload Scale was used to measure stress overload (Amirkhan,
2012). All data was hand-scored by the Student Co-PI and IBM SPSS 22.0 was used for
data analysis. Scores were examined to measure if a preventative-based stress training
affected these variables. Assessment instruments given to the participants were placed in
an envelope in the following order for both pre and posttests:
1. Demographic Survey
2. Stress Overload Scale (SOS)
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
53
3. Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form)
4. Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R): Personal Strain Questionnaire
(PSQ) and Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ)
Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R)
The OSI-R was created by Samuel H. Osipow and Arnold R. Spokane. This
instrument was revised in 1998 and its purpose is to measure three dimensions of
occupational adjustment: occupational stress, psychological strain, and coping resources
(Osipow, 1998). The OSI-R has been utilized with a number of occupations; including the
following occupational groups: executive, professional, technical, marketing,
administrative support, public service/Safety, and agricultural/production/laborer
(Osipow, 1998). More studies have used this inventory with different occupations since
its revision. It has provided quality data to researchers for decades and continues to do so.
The OSI-R included three questionnaires: Occupational Roles Questionnaire
(ORQ), Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ), and Personal Resources Questionnaire
(PRQ). Each domain/scale included different sub-scales in order to best identify where
someone experiences stress or strain, and if they were participating in activities (coping
resources) to help with it. For this study, only two domains/scales were used: Personal
Strain Questionnaire and Personal Resources Questionnaire.
The OSI-R was normalized with a sample of 983 participants in 130 different
occupations. The following information was from the Occupational Stress Inventory-
Revised Professional Manual by Samuel Osipow (1998). The total questionnaire had a
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
54
coefficient alpha of .88 for Occupational Roles Questionnaire, .93 for Personal Strain
Questionnaire, and .89 for Personal Resources Questionnaire. Individual scales were also
tested and their coefficients ranged from .70 to .89. One study sample showed a test-
retest correlation of .74 for the Personal Strain Questionnaire and .68 for the Personal
Resources Questionnaire. The Personal Strain Questionnaire subscales correlations were
.59 for Vocational Strain, .65 for Psychological Strain, .55 for Interpersonal Strain, and
.67 for Physical Strain. The Personal Resources Questionnaire subscales correlations
were .64 for Recreation, .39 for Self-Care, .52 for Social Support, and .71 for
Rational/Cognitive. Multiple sources were used to gather validity data for the OSI-R.
Data from the original OSI and revised OSI-R were compared. Osipow and Spokane
found that the two versions were similar enough to generalize validity from the original
inventory to the revised one. The OSI-R can be administered in an individual or group
setting, and it is a pencil and paper assessment. Instructions were included in the booklet
and it can be completed in less than 20 minutes.
Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form)
Megan Tschannen-Moran and Anita Woolfolk Hoy developed the Teachers’
Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) at Ohio State University. It was called the Ohio State
Teacher Efficacy Scale (OSTES), but was changed to the TSES. It was designed to help
researchers recognize what causes teachers the most difficulty during school day
activities. This scale measures efficacy in student engagement, instructional practices,
and classroom management skills. There was a long version (24 items) and short version
(12 items) available. Pre-service and in-service teachers’ responses were used in separate
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
55
factor analyses (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001). This scale was both reliable and valid
for both the long and short versions. The alpha level overall for the long form was .94,
and each subscale scale was as follows: engagement .87, instruction .91, and management
.90. The short scale had an overall alpha of .90, and each subscale score was as follows:
engagement .81, instruction .86, and management .86. Researchers suggested focusing on
the total score when using this instrument with pre-service teachers. Each item is
measured on a 9 point Likert scale ranging from “nothing”, “very little”, “some
influence”, “quite a bit”, to “a great deal”. Directions are written at the top of the TSES
and participants used a paper-and-pencil format.
Past studies using the TSES with pre-service teachers suggest they respond to each
item based off their current ability (Duffin, French & Patrick, 2012) rather than thinking
how an experienced teacher would answer each one. Duffin, French, and Patrick’s study
used the TSES once with pre-service teachers during the beginning of an introductory
psychological course between fall 2007 and spring 2008; fall 2009 to spring 2011. They
suggest for future research using pre-service teachers’ scores at a different period of time
(2012). This study furthers research regarding student teachers and the use of TSES at a
new point in time. Student teachers will take the scale two times during their first
semester of student teaching. The population will be asked to take the TSES before
training and immediately afterward. The short scale (12 items) can be completed in less
than 10 minutes.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
56
Stress Overload Scale (SOS)
The Stress Overload Scale was developed by James Amirkhan to measure two
factors related to overload: personal vulnerability and event load (Amirkhan, 2012). It has
excellent internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha level >.94 for both subscales and
the measure as a whole. It has good test-retest reliability; coefficients average .75 over
one week. Amirkhan found the SOS’ construct validity has been demonstrated in
significant correlations with other measures of stress and illness (Amirkhan, 2012). Also,
the instrument’s criterion validity has the ability to predict illness after a stressful event.
The scale includes 30 items and uses a 5-point Likert scale to specify feelings and
thoughts experienced over the previous week. It can be completed in less than 10
minutes.
Demographic Survey
The Demographic Survey consisted of background questions about the study’s
participants. These questions included age, gender, ethnicity, education, relationship
status, number of children, teaching certification level (secondary, middle, primary),
GPA, block, and type of school the student is placed at for student teaching. This survey
was included in the assessment packet. Directions were listed above the set of questions
and a paper-and-pencil format was utilized.
Design
This study used a randomized experimental design including a pretest, posttest
control group with random assignment (Slavin, 2007). The study focused on student
teachers overall wellness; it investigated how a stress training effects the overall scores of
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
57
student teachers’ psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress
overload. The experimental group received the stress training and control group
curriculum on a completely different topic from their site coordinator. Both groups
completed a pretest and posttest. Overall scores of psychological strain, coping resources,
self-efficacy, and stress overload were measured with three instruments. The OSI-R
included three different questionnaires: Occupational Roles Questionnaire (ORQ),
Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ), and Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ)
(Osipow, 1998). Only the PSQ and PRQ were used for this study. The PSQ measured
pre-service teachers’ psychological strain and PRQ measured coping resources. The
TSES 1 (short scale) was used to measure self-efficacy and SOS for stress overload
(Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001; Amirkhan, 2012).
Threats to Validity
Researchers aspire to add knowledge to the literature and must do so by satisfying
two principles, internal and external validity. Internal validity is the “degree to which the
results of a study can be attributed to the treatments or other independent variables
identified in the hypothesis” (Slavin, 2007). External validity ensures the study is
generalizable and can be used in other settings or samples. There are many threats to
validity including different types of internal and external threats (Slavin, 2007). Internal
threats include: history, maturation, testing effects, ceiling effects, floor effects,
instrumentation effects, selection bias, statistical regression, mortality (attrition), teacher
effects, school effects, and class effects. External threats to validity include: lack of
internal validity, nonrepresentativeness, artificiality, reactivity, the Hawthorne effect, and
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
58
John Henry effect. Below is a list and description of the internal and external threats to
validity related to this study.
Internal Validity
History and maturation. The control group and experimental group experienced
the same current events and developmental processes. Three training times were available
for the student teachers, but no event occurred between each training time. Maturation
was not a concern, because the trainings were conducted within the same month for the
experimental group participants.
Testing. The control group and experimental group received a pretest and
posttest. Testing was conducted before training or class began and immediately after
training or class was finished for the experimental group and control group. The pretest
for the experimental group may have made the participants more sensitive to the
treatment, and may affect scores on the posttests. The pretest for the control group may
have affected scores on the posttest, because there was little time between testing, and the
curriculum taught to participants between testing was unknown. There were three
opportunities for participants to attend the training. There was an opportunity for
participants to discuss the training with other participants who had previously partaken in
the stress training. Some of the material may have been discussed between trainings.
Instrumentation. All of the measures, methods, and instruments were the same
for each group. Experimental group participants were tested under different conditions
than control group participants. Participants were in different rooms when taking the
pretest and posttest.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
59
Selection bias and mortality (attrition). The subjects were assigned by random
selection and all had equal chance of getting the treatment or control condition. Groups
were initially equal but participants may have shown up late or left early between the
pretest and posttest.
External Validity
Lack of internal validity. Research has been established in regards to teachers
and stress for decades.
Nonrepresentativeness- The population (teachers) has been used in experimental
research for years, but pre-service teachers have not. Few studies have been found
regarding student teachers’ coping skills when it comes to feeling stressed.
Reactivity- Student teachers may behave differently in front of their Mentor
Teacher and program staff members. They interacted with their Mentor Teacher and
program staff members between the pretest and delayed posttest.
Hawthorne effect- Student teachers in the experimental group may alter their
answers on the posttest because they know they are in an experiment.
John Henry effect- Student teachers in the control group may alter their answers
on the posttest because they do not want their scores to come out worse than the
experimental group’s scores.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
60
Procedure
The Experimental and Control Groups
Recruitment. The Student Co-PI or research assistant visited 4-6 classrooms for
recruitment at the College of Education. The Student Co-PI or a research assistant
provided a verbal explanation to pre-service teachers about confidentiality, the informed
consent, and purpose of the study. An envelope with the following documents was given
to prospective participants: a flyer, participant instructions, gift card information, a letter
to participants, informed consent and a notecard. Afterwards, participants were asked to
sign the informed consent and then write their name and email address on a notecard if
they would like to participate. The Student Co-PI or research assistant asked participants
to place the signed informed consent and notecard inside the envelope. The Student Co-
PI or research assistant walked around the room to collect all informed consents and
notecards. The Student Co-PI or research assistant thanked participants and left the room.
All signed informed consents were taken to the Student Co-PI’s private office and put
away in a locked filing cabinet.
Sampling. Each notecard had a number written on it before recruitment. The
Student Co-PI used a random number generator to divide participants into the
experimental and control groups. Participants were divided based off the numbers given
by the random number generator. Two documents were created, one for the experimental
group and one for the control group. Each document had the participant’s name and email
address on it. The control group participants went to their site supervisor’s classroom for
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
61
their cluster meeting and the experimental group participants went to the large lecture
hall room 001 or a small classroom for the stress training.
Training day. Participants were sent an email with information regarding where
to go on training day. Control group participants went to room 253-LRC reading room or
a classroom to complete the pretest then were dismissed to their cluster group. After their
site supervisor dismissed them, participants returned to room 253-LRC reading room or
the classroom for the posttest. Experimental group participants went to the large lecture
hall room 001 or a small classroom for the stress training. Participants took the pretest,
and then participated in the stress training. After the stress training they took the posttest.
The Experimental Group
Pretest. Participants sat in a chair at one of the tables in the large lecture hall-
room 001 or in a small classroom. If a participant did not want to participate in the study
or training, the researcher assistant provided an opportunity for the individual to step out.
They were asked to walk to their site coordinator’s classroom. If student teachers did not
want to participate in data collection, but wanted to attend the training they were asked
not to fill out materials in the packet. The researcher assistant disseminated packets to
each participant and a writing utensil if needed. The researcher used an Administrator’s
Guide to explain what to do during the pretest. Participants filled out each instrument in
the order it was placed inside the packet. They were asked to place all materials back
inside the envelope after they were finished. The pretest packet took 20 minutes to
complete. The research assistant asked participants to place their packet in a container
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
62
located near the front of the room and pencil beside the container. Training began once
all packets were placed in the container and the research assistant left the room.
Stress training. For the experimental group, a PowerPoint presentation was used
to guide participants through the training (see Appendix H). The Student Co-PI led a
stress training for 60 minutes. Participants were asked to partake in multiple activities
throughout the training. The first few minutes of the training was used for an
individual/group activity, followed by definitions and statistics. Participants then
discussed how to know when a person is stressed and physical, emotional, and mental
symptoms a person may display. Afterwards, participants discussed how ongoing stress
affects certain areas of a person’s life. Next, a definition of strain, wellness, and self-care
was explained. Participants were asked questions regarding self-care and their knowledge
about it. A scenario was read aloud, and participants were asked questions about ways a
teacher might display stress symptoms. A brief learning opportunity on teachers and
stress followed with a short discussion.
After participants had an understanding of stress, strain, wellness, and self-care
they were asked to participate in a Solution Focused Brief Therapy technique. Following
this activity, participants walked through techniques from different therapies, including
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Relaxation Therapy. The training outline and
PowerPoint presentation (see Appendix H), followed by a posttest schedule and data
collection directions, was included.
Posttest. Immediately after the training, participants were given a packet by the
research assistant. The research assistant referred back to the Administrator’s Guide to
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
63
direct participants through the posttest. Participants were reminded of the identification
code and asked to write it on the designated area on each document in the packet. Then
participants completed each instrument. After all participants were finished, they were
asked to put all of their forms back into the envelope and place their packet into a
designated container located near the front of the room. Participants were welcome to
leave after turning in his or her packet. The posttest packet took less than 20 minutes to
complete.
The Control Group
Pretest. Participants were asked to meet in room 253-LRC reading room or a
classroom in the College of Education at Texas Tech University to take the pretest. A
research assistant used an Administrator’s Guide to direct participants through the pretest.
If a participant did not want to participate in data collection, the research assistant asked
the pre-service teacher not to fill out materials in the packet. The research assistant
disseminated packets to each participant and a writing utensil if needed. The research
assistant explained what is in each packet and gave directions to participants. Participants
filled out each instrument in the order it was placed inside the packet. They were asked to
place all materials back inside the envelope after they were finished. The pretest packet
took less than 20 minutes to complete. After completing the packet, participants brought
their envelope and writing utensil to a designated container near the front of the room.
After everyone was finished, participants were dismissed to their cluster group meetings.
Alternative curriculum. The control group received curriculum from their site
supervisor during their cluster meeting for 60 minutes.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
64
Posttest. After participants cluster meetings were dismissed by their site
coordinator, participants returned to room 253-LRC reading room or a classroom for the
posttest. The research assistant used the Administrator’s Guide to direct participants
through the posttest. Participants were reminded of the identification code and asked to
write it on the designated area on each document in the packet. Then participants began
completing each instrument. After all participants were finished, they were asked to put
all of their forms back into the envelope and place their packet into a designated
container located near the front of the room. The posttest packet took less than 20
minutes to complete. Participants were dismissed after they completed the posttest.
Risk Factors of Study
There was a recognized risk factor in this study. Personal wellness may be a
difficult topic for some people to discuss in a large group setting. On the one hand, they
may feel a range of emotions when participating in activities that could cause shame or
guilt. On the other hand, participating in activities could make someone feel encouraged
because their personal wellness is healthy. Nonetheless, if participants needed to take a
break from the topic, they were able to step out of the training at any time. There was
TTU staff in the area if a participant needed to consult with someone. Participants were
welcome to exit the study if they felt it necessary.
Data Analysis
This study required 58 pre-service teachers, 18 years of age or older, in the Texas
Tech University Tech Teach program. An analysis using G*Power software and fixing
the effect size f=0.3, α err prob = 0.05, power= 0.8, number of groups= 2, number of
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
65
measurements= 4, and correlations among repeated measures= 0.5 provided a result
stating that the total sample size equals 58. In order to help with attrition, an extra 6
participants were needed in each group, which made the desired total number of
participants equal 70 (Dumville, J., Torgerson, D., & Hewitt, C., 2006). Participants
varied in demographic characteristics (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity, education, relationship
status, number of children, teaching certification level, GPA, block, and type of school
the student is placed at for student teaching). A multivariate analysis of covariance and
the appropriate follow up statistics were run to test the four hypotheses. The experimental
and control group was compared to see if there was statistical significance of the mean
differences between each group. The four hypotheses were tested to determine if
significant mean differences existed.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
66
CHAPTER IV RESULTS
This chapter includes a report for statistical analyses for the current study. The
results are reported in the following sections: research design, demographic data,
descriptive statistics from the Stress Overload Scale (SOS), Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy
Scale 1(short form), two scales from the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R)-
Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) and Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ),
results of hypothesis testing, and a summary of the statistical analyses.
Research Design
The purpose of this study was to investigate student teachers’ knowledge on
stress, self-care, and self-efficacy; to educate them through a stress training; and to assess
the effects of the stress training on student teachers’ psychological strain, coping
resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload. To measure this effect, the research design
utilized a pretest-posttest control group design in which participants were randomly
selected to be in a control group or experimental group. Four instruments and one survey
were utilized before and after the stress management and self-care training. All
assessments were used to measure participant’s pretest and posttest scores. The
assessments were the OSI-R-Personal Strain Questionnaire and Personal Resources
Questionnaire, which were used to measure participant’s psychological strain and coping
resources (Osipow, 1998). The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1(short form) was used
to measure student teacher self-efficacy (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001) and the Stress
Overload Scale was used to measure stress overload (Amirkhan, 2012). One
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
67
demographic survey was utilized to acquire data on participant’s age, gender, ethnicity,
education, relationship status, number of children, teaching certification level, GPA,
block, and type of school the student is placed at for student teaching. All four
instruments and the survey were included in both the pretest and posttest research
packets.
In this study, the researcher investigated student teachers’ overall wellness, the
independent variable, by examining the effectiveness of a stress training on the following
four dependent variables for student teachers: overall score of psychological strain,
coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload. The participants in the experimental
group received a 60-minute stress training in which they were given techniques based off
Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT),
Relaxation Therapy (RT), and the self construct: self-efficacy. The control group did not
receive an alternative training. All data analyses presented was conducted by a computer
analysis using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22.0.
Demographic Data
There were a total of sixty-five (65) participants in this study. A pretest and
posttest research packet was collected from each participant for a total of 130 packets.
Before the statistical analyses were performed, all of the packets were examined by the
researcher for completeness. There was one participant who did not fill out the posttest
packet. Therefore, only sixty-four (64) participants and their data were included. There
were 28 participants in the control group and 36 participants in the experimental group.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
68
The researcher and methodologist cleaned up the raw data after it was entered into SPSS
by the researcher. After data was inspected, statistical analyses were performed.
Demographic variables included age, gender, ethnicity, teaching certification
level, relationship status, education, number of children, GPA, block, and type of school.
Below is a brief summary about each demographic variable and a table description.
Age, Gender, and Ethnicity
Information about participant age, gender, and ethnicity is presented in Table 2, 3,
and 4. Participants were between the ages 20-39. The majority of participants were 21-22
years old (73.4%). By group (see Table 2), the control group participants were between
the ages 20-39 with a mean of 22.96 (SD=4.21). Participants in the experimental group
were between the ages of 21-28 with a mean of 22.22 (SD=1.46). For the variable gender,
overall, 4.7% of participants were male (3) and 95.3% were female (61). By group (see
Table 3), the control group participants included 3.6% male (1) and 96.4% female (27);
the experimental group participants included 5.6% male (2) and 94.4% female (34).
Table 3 shows data for the variable ethnicity. American Indian or Alaskan Native
comprised of 0% of the sample (0), Asian comprised of 0% of the sample (0), Black or
African American comprised of 4.7% of the sample (3), Hispanic/Latino comprised of
18.8% of the sample (12), and Caucasian comprised of 76.6% of the sample (49). By
group (see Table 4), the control group included 7.1% Black or African American (2),
14.3% Hispanic/Latino (4), and 78.6% Caucasian (22) participants. The experimental
group included 2.8% Black or African American (1), 22.2% Hispanic/Latino (8), and
75.0% Caucasian (27) participants.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
69
Table 2: Age and GPA by Group
Group Variable N Mean SD Control Group Age 28 22.96 4.21
GPA 27 3.67 0.28
Stress Training-Experimental Group
Age 36 22.22 1.46 GPA 33 3.60 0.31
Note. Missing data from one participant for the variable GPA in the Control Group. Missing data from three participants for the variable GPA in the Stress-Training Experimental Group. Table 3: Gender by Group
Group Gender Frequency % Control Group Male 1 3.6
Female 27 96.4 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training-Experimental Group
Male 2 5.6 Female 34 94.4
Total 36 100.0
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
70
Table 4: Ethnicity by Group
Group Ethnicity Frequency % Control Group American Indian or
Alaskan Native Asian Black or African American
0 0 2
0 0
7.1
Hispanic/Latino 4 14.3 Caucasian 22 78.6 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training-Experimental Group
American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian Black or African American
0 0 1
0 0
2.8
Hispanic/Latino 8 22.2 Caucasian 27 75.0 Total 36 100.0
Teaching Certification Level, Relationship Status, Education, and Number of
Children
Table 5, 6, 7, and 8 show the results for participant teaching certification level,
relationship status, education, and number of children. There were 73.4% participants
getting their teaching certification on the primary level (47), 26.6% on the middle level
(17) and 0% on the secondary level (0). By group (see Table 5), for control group
participants 71.4% were earning their teaching certification at the primary level (20) and
28.6% were earning their teaching certification at the middle level (8). For the
experimental group participants, 75.0% were earning their certification at the primary
level (27) and 25.0% were earning it at the middle level (9). Table 6 provides information
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
71
about the variable relationship status. Overall, 43.8% of participants were single (28),
7.8% married (5), 42.2% dating (27), 0% widowed (0), 1.6% divorced/separated (1), and
4.7% living with a partner (3). By group (see Table 5), of participants in the control
group 42.9% were single (12), 7.1% married (2), 39.3% dating (11), 3.6%
divorced/separated (1), and 7.1% living with a partner (2). For participants in the
experimental group, 44.4% were single (16), 8.3% married (3), 44.4% dating (16), and
2.8% living with a partner (1). Next, participants provided information on the highest
level of education they have received thus far. Overall, high school graduate comprised
of 1.6% (1), 56.3% some college (36), 23.4% associates degree (15), 18.8% bachelor’s
degree (12), and 0% graduate degree (0). By group (see Table 7), participants assigned to
the control group included 71.4% some college (20), 25.0% associates degree (7), and
3.6% bachelor’s degree (1). Experimental group participants included 2.8% high school
graduate (1), 44.4% some college (16), 22.2% associates degree (8), and 30.6%
bachelor’s degree (11). Data about the number of children each participant had was also
provided. Overall, 93.8% reported having 0 children (60), 1.6% had one child (1), 3.1%
had two children (2) and 1.6% had three children (1). By group (see Table 8), of
participants in the control group 85.7% reported having zero children (24), 3.6% had one
child (1), 7.1% had two children (2), and 3.6% had three children (1). All the participants
in the control group (36) reported having zero children.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
72
Table 5: Teaching Certification Level by Groups
Group Teaching Certification Level Frequency % Control Group Primary 20 71.4
Middle Secondary
8 0
28.6 0
Total 28 100.0 Stress Training-Experimental Group
Primary 27 75.0 Middle Secondary
9 0
25.0 0
Total 36 100.0
Table 6: Relationship Status by Groups
Group Relationship Status Frequency % Control Group Single 12 42.9
Married 2 7.1 Dating Widowed
11 0
39.3 0
Divorced/Separated 1 3.6 Living with a partner 2 7.1 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training-Experimental Group
Single 16 44.4 Married 3 8.3 Dating Widowed Divorced/Separated
16 0 0
44.4 0 0
Living with a partner 1 2.8 Total 36 100.0
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
73
Table 7: Education by Groups
Group Education Frequency % Control Group High School Graduate
Some college 0
20 0
71.4 Associates Degree 7 25.0 Bachelors Degree Graduate Degree
1 0
3.6 0
Total 28 100.0 Stress Training-Experimental Group
High School Graduate 1 2.8 Some college 16 44.4 Associates Degree 8 22.2 Bachelors Degree Graduate Degree
11 0
30.6 0
Total 36 100.0 Table 8: Number of Children by Groups
Group Number of Children Frequency Percent Control Group 0 24 85.7
1 1 3.6 2 2 7.1 3 1 3.6 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training- Experimental Group
0 36 100.0
Total
36 100.0
GPA, Block, and Type of School
Participant information on GPA, block, and type of school for this sample was
included in Table 1, 9, and 10. GPA for participants ranged between 2.7 to 4.0. By group
(see Table 1), the control group participants GPA was between 2.7-4.0 with a mean of
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
74
3.67 (SD=0.28). One participant’s information for GPA was missing from the control
group. Participant GPA in the experimental group was between 2.8-4.0 with a mean of
3.60 (SD=0.31). Three participants information for GPA was missing from the
experimental group. Participants provided information on what block of student teaching
they were in within their teacher certification program at Texas Tech University. Overall,
84.0% of participants were in their third block of the teaching certification program (54)
and 15.6% were in their fourth block (10). By group (see Table 9), of the participants
assigned to the control group 82.1% were in Block 3 (23) and 17.9% were in Block 4 (5).
Of participants in the experimental group, 86.1% were in Block 3 (31) and 13.9% were in
Block 4 (5). Lastly, the type of school participants worked at during their student
teaching year was included. If a school is considered to be Title I, then it is receiving
federal grants to improve the academic achievement of students from low-income
families (U.S. Department of Education, 2015). Table 9 shows 92.2% of participants
were at a Title I school during student teaching (59) and 7.8% were not at a Title I school
(5). By group (see Table 10), 89.3% of participants selected to be in the control group
were placed in a Title I school during student teaching (25) and 10.7% were not placed in
a Title I school (3). For participants selected to be in the experimental group, 94.4% were
placed in a Title I school (34) and 5.6% were not placed in a Title I school (2).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
75
Table 9: Block by Groups
Group Block Frequency Percent Control Group 3 23 82.1
4 5 17.9 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training-Experimental Group
3 31 86.1 4 5 13.9 Total 36 100.0
Table 10: Type of School by Groups
Group Type of School Frequency Percent Control Group Title I 25 89.3
Not Title I 3 10.7 Total 28 100.0
Stress Training-Experimental Group
Title I 34 94.4 Not Title I 2 5.6 Total 36 100.0
Descriptive Statistics
Scoring Scales
The Stress Overload Scale (SOS) was scored based on participant answers to a
30-question inventory. Participants responded to the scale by rating their feelings during
the past week. Participants answered using a Likert Scale of 1-5 (1=Not At All to 5=A
Lot). The instrument was given to participants by paper and pencil. The SOS instrument
was hand-scored by the researcher. There are two subscales on the SOS: personal
vulnerability scale and event load scale. The odd numbered items were totaled for the
personal vulnerability scale score. The even numbered items were totaled for the event
load scale score. For this study, only the overall score was used. Responses to questions
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
76
1, 6, 11, 16, 21, and 26 were ignored because these are filler items. Question number 5
was reverse coded. Higher overall scores indicate higher levels of stress. This study used
the overall mean score to measure differences between the pretest and posttest.
The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form) was scored based on
participant answers to a 12-question inventory. Participants responded to the scale by
rating their opinion about the 12 questions on the inventory. The purpose of this
inventory is to help researchers gain a better understanding of what creates difficulties for
teachers during school. Participants answered using a Likert Scale of 1-9 (1= Nothing to
9= A Great Deal). The instrument was given to participants by paper and pencil. The
TSES was hand-scored by the researcher and checked for accuracy by the methodologist.
There are three subscales on the TSES (short form): student engagement, instructional
practices, and classroom management. Items 2, 4, 7, and 11 are totaled for the efficacy in
student engagement score. Items 5, 9, 10, and 12 are totaled for the efficacy in
instructional practices score. Items 1,3, 6, 8 are totaled for the efficacy in classroom
management score. A higher score indicates student teachers are experiencing many daily
difficulties during school activities within the three subscales measured within the TSES
Scale 1 (short form). For this study, the overall mean score was used to measure
differences between the pretest and posttest.
The Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) was scored based on participant
answers to a 40-question inventory. Participants responded to the scale by rating the
number that fits them best regarding their vocational, psychological, interpersonal, and
physical strain. Participants answered using a Likert Scale of 1-5 (1= rarely or never true
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
77
to 5= true most of the time). The instrument was given to participants by paper and
pencil. The PSQ was hand-scored by the researcher. There are four subscales on the PSQ:
vocational strain, psychological strain, interpersonal strain, and physical strain. Items 1-
10 are totaled for vocational strain and item 6, 8, and 9 are reverse coded. Items 11-20 are
totaled for psychological strain and item 14, 19, and 20 are reverse coded. Items 21-30
are totaled for interpersonal strain and item 24 and 27 are reverse coded. Items 31-40 are
totaled for physical strain and item 40 is reverse coded. Higher scores suggest
participants are experiencing significant levels of psychological strain. The overall raw
scores were the scores used to measure differences between the pretest and posttest.
The Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ) was scored based on participant
answers to a 40-question inventory. Participants responded to the scale by rating the
number that fits them best regarding recreation, self-care, social support, and
rational/cognitive coping resources. Participants answered using a Likert Scale of 1-5 (1=
rarely or never true to 5= true most of the time). The instrument was given to participants
by paper and pencil. The PRQ was hand-scored by the researcher. There are four
subscales on the PRQ: recreation, self-care, social support, and rational/cognitive coping.
Items 1-10 are totaled for recreation resources and item 8 was reverse coded. Items 11-20
are totaled for self-care resources. Items 21-30 are totaled for social support resources
and items 31-40 are totaled for rational/cognitive coping resources. Higher scores suggest
participants have highly developed coping resources. The overall raw scores were the
scores used to measure differences between the pretest and posttest.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
78
Hypothesis Testing
In the following section, the results for each of the four hypotheses are offered.
This study examined whether a stress training influenced scores on four dependent
variables. This section contains the results of a multivariate analysis of covariance
(MANCOVA). A list including each hypothesis is provided and followed by results of
the tests for the independent and dependent variables.
Prior to analysis, the researcher and methodologist screened the data for accuracy,
missing data, outliers, and to assess the fit between data and assumptions (Mertler &
Vannatta, 2005). First, data was assessed for accuracy by using the SPSS frequencies
procedure. After determining the data set was accurate, the researcher began screening
for missing data. One participant did not fill out the posttest; therefore, their data was not
used during the analysis. Other missing variables were not a concern, because there were
very few and they were missing at random. SPSS 22.0 diagnostics were run to detect
potential outliers. The data was not adjusted for outliers since data was normal and few
outliers were found. Finally, the researcher assessed the fit between data and assumptions
(Mertler & Vannatta, 2005, p. 142,).
Participants were randomly sampled into their groups and independent of each
other. An interquartile range, variances, and standard deviations were calculated as
measures of variability; boxplots were run by the IV to check for normality (see
Appendix T). T-tests were run to see if all IV groups were equivalent; groups were not
significant on the pretests; therefore, all groups were equivalent from the start of the
study. The assumption of homoscedasticity was assessed with Box’s Test of Equality of
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
79
Covariance Matrices. It was not significant F(10, 13.627.217)= 0.887, p>.001. Equal
variances were assumed and Wilks’ Lambda was used as the multivariate test statistic.
A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was run originally to analyze the
data. The results proved insignificant, but showed possible significance may be there.
The data was ran with t-scores, raw scores, and finally with a multivariate analysis of
covariance (MANCOVA), because it showed the most accurate results. The MANCOVA
was run with the only continuous variable GPA. Below are the results after running a
MANCOVA with GPA as the covariate.
Results
Hypotheses. The following hypotheses were tested during this study:
1. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group with regards to psychological strain as measured by the Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire.
2. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest and mean
posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and control
group in regard to coping resources as measured by the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ).
3. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in teacher self-efficacy as
measured by the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
80
4. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores of student
teachers in the experimental group and control group in stress overload as
measured by the Stress Overload Scale (SOS).
Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was computed with an alpha
level of .05 to test the four hypotheses by determining the effect of a stress training on
student teachers psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload
as measured by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal
Strain Questionnaire, Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal
Resources Questionnaire (PRQ), Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form), and
Stress Overload Scale (SOS) while controlling for GPA (see Table 11) . Prior to the test,
data was transformed and a MANOVA was run with t-scores and raw scores. The results
revealed insignificant differences among the stress training-experimental group on the
combined dependent variables psychological strain measured by the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire, coping resources
measured by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal
Resources Questionnaire (PRQ), self-efficacy measured by the Teacher’s Sense of
Efficacy Scale 1 (short form), and stress overload measured by the Stress Overload Scale
(SOS) within the posttest data, Wilks’ Λ= .886, F=(4,58)=1.874, p>.05, multivariate η2=
.114. Because the results were close to being significant for the dependent variable
coping resources, F(1,63)=1.771 p=.188, the researcher ran a MANCOVA using only
raw scores with the covariate GPA. Variables were transformed to eliminate outliers.
Two outliers from the control group and three from the experimental group were
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
81
eliminated. One subject was responsible for multiple outliers. Because there were only a
few other outliers, their values were simply deleted from the data set. MANCOVA results
revealed significant differences overall among the stress training-experimental group on
the combined posttest dependent variables psychological strain measured by the
Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire
(PSQ), coping resources measured by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition
(OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ), self-efficacy measured by the
Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form), and stress overload measured by the
Stress Overload Scale (SOS). The covariate (GPA) significantly influenced the combined
dependent variables, Wilks’ Λ= .825, F=(4,53)=2.814, p< .05, multivariate η2= .175.
Significant results were revealed on one dependent variable, coping resources, measured
by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources
Questionnaire (PRQ) for the stress training-experimental group’s posttest data,
F(1,59)=4.616, p<.05. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was
conducted on each dependent variable as a follow-up test to MANCOVA. Stress training-
experimental group category differences revealed significant results for dependent
variables coping resources measured by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised
Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ), F(1,63)= 8.59, p<.05, stress
overload measured by the Stress Overload Scale (SOS), F(1,62)= 4.05, p=.05, and self-
efficacy measured by the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form), F(1,63)=
21.05, p=.000. No significant results were found for the dependent variable personal
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
82
strain measured by the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal
Strain Questionnaire, F(1,63)= .034, p>.05.
Table 11: Summary of Results
Independent Variable
Mean Std. Deviation
N F Sig.
Post SOS Total
Control Group
Stress-Training Experimental
Group
Total
94.12
92.73
93.34
25.88
20.46
22.81
26
33
59
.022
.883
Post TSES Mean
Control Group
Stress-Training Experimental
Group
Total
7.17
6.8
6.96
1.1
0.85
0.98
26
33
59
2.096
.153
Post PRQ Raw Means
Control Group
Stress-Training Experimental
Group
Total
2.91
3.1
3.02
0.35
0.34
0.35
26
33
59
4.616
.036*
POST Raw PSQ Means
Control Group
Stress-Training Experimental
Group
Total
2.56
2.66
2.62
0.54
0.51
0.52
26
33
59
.580
.449
*p<.05
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
83
Summary of the Statistical Analyses
The purpose of this study was to discover if a stress training intervention would
affect student teachers psychological strain, coping resources, self- efficacy, and stress
overload. This chapter displayed the research design, demographic data, descriptive
statistics, results of a multivariate analysis of covariance, and follow-up tests. The control
group and experimental group were not significantly different consequent to the pretest.
The multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) test of the dependent
variables with covariate GPA was the statistic focused on by the researcher. This analysis
produced a significant result for hypothesis 2, “There will be no significant difference
between the mean pretest and mean posttest overall scores of student teachers in the
experimental group and control group in regard to coping resources as measured by the
Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources
Questionnaire (PRQ).” The MANCOVA indicated after a 60-minute stress training, the
experimental group reported significantly different scores on the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ), which
tested for participant’s developed personal resources, than the control group. Follow-up
tests also reported significant differences with participant coping resources, self-efficacy,
and stress overload scores between the experimental and control group.
Chapter V includes a summary of the findings, implications, limitations,
recommendations for future research, and conclusions. Following this chapter is a list
references and the appendices.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
84
CHAPTER V FINDINGS
The following section includes a summary of the findings and a discussion of the
findings. Implications for practice, limitations, and recommendations for future research
will follow. Lastly, conclusions are discussed about the importance of this area in
research and the gains from future research.
Summary of the Findings
The purpose of this study was to determine if a 60-minute stress training would
affect student teachers psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress
overload. The four variables were chosen because research indicated that teachers are
leaving the profession at a rapid rate and these variables may provide an explanation as to
why (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014; Coronado, 2011; Lunney, 2006; Maslach et
al., 1996; McCarthy et al., 2009; Sass, Flores, Claeys, & Perez, 2012). Four instruments
and one demographic survey were used to assess whether the stress training affected the
four dependent variables through a pretest-posttest control group design study. The
experimental group received the stress training, while the control group received
curriculum unrelated to the training topic. The researcher facilitated the stress training,
but research suggests that a LPC or CSC facilitate this training to student teachers or
current teachers in the future, with additional training, because the researcher was an
LPC-Intern. According to the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics and
American School Counselor Association (2014; 2010), LPCs and CSCs have a
responsibility to benefit the community and collaborate. Through their years of
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
85
experience, additional training, and collaboration the study might be done more
effectively with a LPC or CSC leading it in the future instead of an LPC-Intern. The
community benefits of a LPC or CSC leading the training could be significant due to
their professional experience. LPCs and CSCs can also collaborate to create a better
training to do again in the future (American Counseling Association, 2014; American
School Counselor Association, 2010).
Whether through school or community counselors, this study could contribute to
the counseling profession by providing a pathway for counselors to become an asset to
the teaching profession. This study seeks to do so by creating stress-prevention
curriculum and providing opportunities for teachers to learn healthy coping skills. It is
also important to mention this study may empower college professors and instructors in
Counselor Education or Teacher programs. This can be done through the provision of a
stress-prevention curriculum for teacher preparation programs to include within their
degree program in order to decrease attrition rates for new teachers.
Occupational stress is a very real issue within the teaching profession. Teachers
continue to leave the profession for a multitude of reasons (Sass et al., 2012), whether
they have been teaching for five or twenty years (Ingersoll et al., 2014). If teachers leave
the profession early, it can negatively affect the students, faculty, school, community,
state, and nation, who will then have to deal with the consequences. There is a deep need
to understand why teachers are leaving the profession and then to figure out ways to
retain them. Research indicates stress has been a major issue in the teaching profession
for decades (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014, July; Ingersoll et al., 2014; Sass et
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
86
al., 2012). To sum, it is evident teachers need support, and community leaders, such
LPCs and CSCs, can step up to meet this need. Literature reveals LPCs helped teachers
cope with stress and witnessed significant effects from the program or training utilized
(Clemens, 2007; Froeschle & Crews, 2010; Tatar, 2009). Most of the studies listed above
were done in a short period of time, but the effects of a long-term training or stress
prevention curriculum implemented throughout a teacher preparation program could save
teachers’ careers.
The results of this study may have been affected due to the content covered during
the stress training. Participants were made more aware of the stress teachers face on a
daily basis and ways to cope with stress. This could have affected their answers on the
posttest through realizing the teaching profession is difficult and the need for healthy
coping skills is vital to a teacher’s career. The training may have accomplished making
them more aware and open about the future struggles they will face and the need to start
implementing self-care.
Discussion of the Findings
The following section includes a discussion of the hypotheses and results of this
study. A review of each hypothesis, the result, and a discussion will follow. Lastly, a
discussion of the study’s overall results will be covered.
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest
and mean posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
87
control group with regards to psychological strain as measured by the Occupational
Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Strain Questionnaire.
This hypothesis was sustained. The results of this hypothesis indicated no
significant difference between the experimental and control group when analyzed with
the MANCOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA.
Participants were in their later phase of the teacher certification program during
this study, and had little experience in the teaching profession outside of student teaching.
Their personal strain scores were not very high based on the pretest and posttest results
and it was unlikely their strain would increase between the pretest and posttest. Posttest
results indicated on average the control group scored a 2.56 and experimental group a
2.66 on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores suggest significant levels of psychological
strain (Osipow, 1998). During this study, it is possible participants had not been in the
field long enough to experience on-going stress related to student misbehavior,
inadequate administrative support, heavy workload, demanding schedules, lack of
training, and low salaries (Curtis, 2012; Dagli, 2012; Hartwick & Kang, 2013; Ingersoll
et al., 2014; Sass et al., 2012). According to Hinkle, Wiersma, and Jurs (2003), effect
sizes range from small (.25), to medium (.50), to large (1.00). This instrument’s effect
size was found to be small and positive (d = .19). Cohen’s D converts the effect size to a
z-score of .075, which means there is a 7.5% difference under the normal curve between
the control group and experimental group. If the training was given to the control group
on average 7.5% should show improvement. Follow-up tests indicated significant
differences on average between the experimental and control group.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
88
Hypothesis 2. There will be no significant difference between the mean pretest
and mean posttest overall scores of student teachers in the experimental group and
control group in regard to coping resources as measured by the Occupational Stress
Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R)-Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ).
This hypothesis was rejected. The results of this hypothesis indicated a significant
difference between the experimental and control group when analyzed with the
MANCOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA.
This training focused on teaching participants different ways to cope with stress
professionally and personally. Participants in the experimental group learned various
techniques to improve their coping resources throughout the stress training. This
questionnaire focused on how participants were coping through recreation, self-care,
social support, and rational/cognitive coping. Techniques were chosen related to the
subscales; participants were given a demonstration for each technique and how to apply
each one. On average, the posttest overall mean score for the experimental group was
2.91 and experimental group 3.1 out of a 5-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates
highly developed coping resources (Osipow, 1998). According to Hinkle et al.’s (2003)
scale, this instruments effect size was found to be positive and medium (d =.55). Cohen’s
D converts the effect size to a z-score of .209, which means there is a 20.9% difference
under the normal curve between the control group and experimental group. If the training
was given to the control group on average 20.9% should show improvement. Follow-up
tests indicated significant differences on average between the experimental and control
group.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
89
Hypothesis 3. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores
of student teachers in the control group and experimental group in teacher self-efficacy as
measured by the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form).
This hypothesis was sustained. The results of this hypothesis indicated no
significant difference between the experimental and control group when analyzed with
the MANCOVA. Follow-up testing found a significant difference when analyzed with the
repeated-measures ANOVA.
Although results for this instrument were not significant, student teachers were
not given time to put the techniques into practice; therefore, self-efficacy levels did not
have time to improve within the duration of this study. The definition of self-efficacy is
“an individual's belief in his or her capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce
specific performance attainments” (Carey & Forsyth, 2015). If students had the
opportunity to practice each stress management technique over a period of time, a natural
outcome of this study would be an increase in self-efficacy based off the definition used
for this study. The average means for the posttest results for the control group were 7.17
and 6.8 for the experimental group on a 9-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicated the
group of student teachers was experiencing many daily difficulties during school
activities within the three subscales measured within the TSES Scale 1 (short form). The
effect size for this instrument was found to be small and negative (d = -.38). Meaning on
average there would be no significant change in self-efficacy levels if the control group
were given the stress training according to results from the MANCOVA. Follow-up tests
indicated significant differences on average between the experimental and control group.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
90
Hypothesis 4. There will be no significant difference between the overall scores
of student teachers in the control group and experimental group in stress overload as
measured by the Stress Overload Scale (SOS).
This hypothesis was sustained. The results of this hypothesis indicated no
significant difference between the experimental and control group when analyzed with
the MANCOVA. Follow- up testing found significant difference when analyzed with the
repeated-measures ANOVA.
The control group and experimental group on average experienced high levels of
stress according to their overall mean scores. The Stress Overload Scale had a maximum
score of 120 (Amirkhan, 2012). The control group overall mean score on the posttest was
94.12 and 92.73 for the experimental group. Higher scores indicated higher levels of
stress for each group. On average, there was a 1.39 difference between the experimental
group and control group. It is possible that the stress training influenced the experimental
groups stress levels based off these scores. The effect size for this instrument was small
and negative (d = -.06). Meaning on average, if the control group was given the stress
training no significant change would be found according to results from the MANCOVA.
Follow-up tests indicated significant differences on average between the experimental
and control group.
Overall, the study achieved what it set out to do: provide more coping skills for
student teachers that they can apply throughout their teaching career. The Personal
Resource Questionnaire (PRQ) posttest scores indicated the experimental group obtained
more coping resources, which could suggest the stress training fulfilled its purpose.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
91
Levels of stress, personal strain, and self-efficacy were not significantly different during
the duration of the study. It was not expected for stress levels to change during the pretest
and posttest. It is likely participants were not experiencing personal strain before this
study; stress develops into strain over a period of time. Participants were tested within a
90-minute period on their personal strain levels. Self-efficacy usually develops overtime
as a skill is being practiced; therefore, it was unlikely the groups would show any
significance with this variable. Results from the MANOVA indicated there was potential
for significance to be found. After running a MANCOVA with the covariate GPA,
significance was found on the PRQ. GPA and means for each group were similar and
normal. The distributions were slightly different; the control group demonstrated a
leptokurtic distribution, while the experimental group was more platykurtic (Field, 2009).
The results indicated multiple participants in the control group had the same GPA;
participants in the experimental group were spread out.
Significance of the Results
The following section covers the implications this study has on counselors, the
counseling profession, teachers, the teaching profession, counselor education and teacher
preparation programs, and covers limitations of the study.
Implications for Practice and Research
Implications for practice. This study examined the effect of a 60-minute stress
training on student teacher’s psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and
stress overload. Teachers have been experiencing stress since the 1970’s (Sass et al.,
2012). The number of stressors teachers have attempted to cope with on a daily basis has
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
92
only increased over the last four decades (Curtis, 2012; Dagli, 2012; Hartwick & Kang,
2013; Ingersoll et al., 2014; Sass et al., 2012). Maslach et al. (1996) stated professionals
dealing with ongoing stress might be vulnerable to experiencing even higher levels of
stress, or constant stress (strain), which can lead to burnout. Burnout can lead to higher
attrition rates when teachers leave the profession (Curtis, 2012; Kipps-Vaughan, 2013).
LPCs and CSCs have an opportunity to assist the teaching profession by taking a
preventative stance on teacher attrition and by creating a stress training to use during their
teacher certification program. Many of the techniques used during this study can be
utilized for student teachers and current teachers to prevent burnout. Student teachers
have the time, willingness, drive, and support to learn these concepts during this period of
their education. They can begin to utilize the techniques before starting their career as a
teacher. Current teachers can start using these techniques to prevent on-going stress
(strain) and burnout.
Four instruments and one survey were used during this study. Two questionnaires
from the Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised (OSI-R) were utilized during this study:
Persona Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) and Personal Resources Questionnaire (PRQ). The
PSQ measured psychological strain with the use of four subscales: Vocational Strain
(VS), Psychological Strain (PSY), Interpersonal Strain (IS) and Physical Strain (PHS).
The PRQ measured coping resources with the use of four subscales: Recreation (RE),
Self-Care (SC), Social Support (SS) and Rational/Cognitive Coping (RC). The PSQ can
be used to inform LPCs and CSCs of what type of stress and the severity of stress
teachers are trying to manage. The PRQ can be used to inform counselors of what
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
93
resources teachers are lacking to help them cope with stress. Both questionnaires can be
utilized to create a curriculum for student teachers or current teachers on stress
management and self-care.
The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy short form (Scale 1) can be used to help
counselors know what type of situations cause teachers the most difficulty during daily
activities. This scale used the following subscales to measure self-efficacy: student
engagement, instructional practices, and classroom management skills. Increased self-
efficacy can be a natural outcome when a teacher feels confident in his or her skills. By
using this scale, counselors know if the stress training is really taking an effect to teachers
on a professional and personal level.
The Stress Overload Scale (SOS) used two factors to measure stress overload:
personal vulnerability and event load. This scale can provide counselors on the level of
stress a student teacher or current teacher is feeling. The SOS looked at how a person has
felt during the past week. This scale can easily be used to see if a curriculum is working
over a short-term or long-term period. It can also provide a solid foundation for
counselors to work from when developing stress preventative curriculum.
Implications for research. Student teachers experience various levels of stress
throughout their teacher preparation program as a student and teacher-in-training. Results
for this population regarding psychological strain measured by the PSQ and stress
overload measured be the SOS may not have been found because student teachers were
not experiencing those levels of stress yet. Current teachers work under difficult
circumstances while having pressure placed on them from students, staff, and
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
94
administration (Curtis, 2012; Dagli, 2012). Student teachers are not experiencing the
same kind of stressors during their student teaching. The training was taught to student
teachers before they hit the level of stress or strain current teachers are experiencing. The
results for psychological strain and stress overload were not significant or very different
between the pretest and posttest. There are very few studies focused on stress training
programs and student teachers (Brown & Nagel, 2004; Harris, 2011; Wilkins-Canter,
Edwards, & Young, 2000; Yacapsin, 2010), but the topic of teachers and stress has been
in the literature for decades (Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014, July; Ingersoll et al.,
2014; Sass et al., 2012). Student teachers experience stress throughout their training, but
current teachers are constantly coping with stressors, which leads to strain from ongoing
stress. Student teachers are not on that level at this point in their training.
The study found on posttest scores that self-efficacy by group average was equal
to or higher than mean scores from another study completed with student teachers, also
called pre-service teachers (Duffin, French, & Patrick, 2012). For this study, participants
had low levels of self-efficacy because they marked higher scores on the 9-point Likert
scale. Self-efficacy develops overtime as a person matures and practices skills. Student
teachers during this study did not have time to practice the techniques taught within the
stress training between the pretest and posttest. A slight difference was found between
participants within the experimental group (overall posttest group mean 6.8) and control
group (overall posttest group mean 7.17). The MANCOVA did not find significant
results on the TSES, but it is important to note that student teachers in this 2015 study are
experiencing lower levels of self-efficacy than those in the 2012 study by Duffin, French,
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
95
and Patrick. If student teachers are feeling this level of stress or low sense of self-efficacy
now, how will they handle it as a full-time teacher? More research on this population is
suggested.
The MANCOVA found significant results on the PRQ for student teachers coping
resources. This study accomplished what it set out to do, provide student teachers with
stress management and self-care techniques. It was expected that student teachers would
leave the training knowing more about stress, strain, self-care, and new ways to cope with
stress.
Limitations of the Study
Limitations. The design of this study was experimental to assess if a stress
training would effect student teachers psychological strain, coping resources, stress
overload, and self-efficacy. One limitation of this study was time. Student teachers at this
university were on a strict schedule and there was only time to train them in one sixty-
minute session. A second limitation was the low-response rate. Although the sample size
was met in order to reach the recommended power, results indicated at the end of the
study uneven groups and it appears this could have caused a restriction in the power
analysis. Outliers were not removed from the study due to the small sample, which may
have resulted in skewed scores on the MANCOVA. Third, this study was done in one
university setting and may not be generalizable to other universities.
The researcher was not present while participants were completing the survey and
instruments. The research assistants were trained before proctoring the pretest and
posttest, but may not have been familiar enough with each one to answer questions from
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
96
participants adequately. The researcher cannot be confident that participants fully
understood each question and took the time to contemplate each one before answering it.
Another limitation is the three trainings were scheduled on three different dates. There
was time between each training session for participants to communicate with one another
about their experience. Participants who had taken the training at an earlier date could
have influenced students who participated in the later trainings.
Delimitations. This study was completed only with student teachers, because
there was not a lot of literature found on stress related to this population. It also included
only one group of student teachers from one university setting, because this university
had a large number of student teachers within its teacher preparation program that would
allow the researcher time and access to conduct the study. Nonetheless, results may not
be generalizable to populations outside this setting.
Recommendations for Future Research
Recommendations
There are many recommendations for future research using the concepts covered
during this study.
1. This study focused on a sample from one university setting. Future research
may look and compare samples from multiples universities.
2. The training was taught in one sixty-minute session to student teachers. In
the future, the training could be taught over a longer period of time.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
97
3. The study was a pretest-posttest control group design. The pretest and
posttest were given to participants on the same day. In the future, a delayed
posttest is recommended to give participants time to use the techniques
taught during the training. This will help the researcher know if the
techniques were beneficial and how they affect the dependent variables.
During this study, participant’s level of stress, strain, and self-efficacy did
not change because the training techniques were not applied between the
pretest and posttest.
4. In the future, the study could include a competency-based protocol to see
whether or not the techniques were practiced and beneficial to participants.
5. If this training was done again with current teachers, it is recommended that
an extra training piece be included for school principals so they are aware
of what teachers are going through. This will make principals aware of the
extra stress they might be placing on teachers, leading them to change some
of the tasks they give to teachers.
6. Future studies can include knowledge counselors have on the amount of
stress teachers are under. An additional study could focus on parents and if
they are aware of the amount of stress teachers manage on a daily basis.
7. Future studies can look at the difference between special education teachers
and regular teachers stress levels.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
98
8. The next recommendation is for this study to be done with different
ethnicities and genders. The majority of participants in this study were
Caucasian and female.
9. Lastly, it is recommended that researchers compare public versus private
schoolteachers’ stress levels. The majority of participants in this study
student taught at a public school, and most of the research included in this
study focused on public school teachers’ stress levels.
Conclusion
Research indicates teachers are still experiencing high levels of stress and strain,
which could cause them to leave the profession. New teachers are leaving within the first
five years and experienced teachers are retiring before their time. For many, this study
may provide more evidence that teacher attrition is becoming a bigger issue each year.
For others, it may provide a solution on ways to prevent teachers from burning out, while
providing ways for them to take care of themselves professionally and personally.
This study fulfilled its purpose by equipping student teachers with new techniques
to help them cope with stress on a professional and personal level. The results of this
study were mixed, because three of the four hypotheses were retained while one was
rejected. A MANCOVA was run and participant’s scores for the PSQ, TSES, and SOS
were not significant; the PRQ found significant results for coping resources. Practically,
school administrators, counselors, district or state officials, and the education board may
wonder if teaching concepts like the ones mentioned in this study are worth it. By taking
a look at the significant results found in this study and seeing a group difference after
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
99
participants completed one sixty-minute training session, it is possible teaching stress
management and self-care skills could positively impact the profession and, hopefully,
retain more teachers. Implications for the study suggest more research is needed for this
population and the use of stress preventative trainings. It is recommended the stress
management techniques be taught to current teachers as well. The implications also
suggest that the study be replicated with student teachers from other universities, as well
as current teachers in a public or private school setting.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
100
REFERENCES
Allen, M. B. (2005). Eight questions on teacher recruitment and retention: What does the research say? Retrieved from Education Commission of the States website: http://www.ecs.org/html/educationissues/teachingquality/trrreport/home/teacherrecruitmentretention.pdf
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2014). On the path to equity: Improving the effectiveness of beginning teachers. Washington, DC.
Alkhadher, O., & Al-Naser, H. (2006). Assessing occupational stress, strain, and coping for North American teachers in Kuwait. Psychological Reports, 99, 681-690.
Aloe, A., Amo, L., & Shanahan, M. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101-126.
American Counseling Association (2014). ACA Code of Ethics. Alexandria, VA: ACA Governing Council. Retrieved from http://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
American Psychological Association (2013). How stress affects your health. Washington, DC: APA. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/stress-facts.pdf
American Psychological Association (2015). Stress in America: Paying with our health. Washington, DC: APA.
American School Counselor Association (2010). Ethical standards for school counselors. Alexandria, VA: ASCA.
Amirkhan, J. (2012). Stress overload: A new approach to the assessment of stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 55-71.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Bates, A. J., & Burbank, M. D. (2008). Effective student teacher supervision in the era of no child left behind. Professional Educator, 32(2), 1-11.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
101
Borg, M., Riding, R., & Falzon, J. (1991). Stress in teaching: A study of occupational stress and its determinants, job satisfaction, and career commitment among primary schoolteachers. Educational Psychology, 11(1), 59-75.
Brown, S., & Nagel, L. (2004). Preparing future teachers to respond to stress: Sources and solutions. Actions in Teacher Education, 26(1), 34-42.
Brown, K.M. & Wynn, S.R. (2007). Teacher retention issues: How some principals are supporting and keeping new teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 17(6), 664-698.
Brown, E., Powell, E., & Clark, A. (2012). Working on what works: working with teachers to improve classroom behaviour and relationships. Educational Psychology In Practice, 28(1), 19-30.
Buchanan, J. (2012). Telling tales out of school: Exploring why former teachers are not returning to the classroom. Australian Journal of Education (ACER Press), 56(2), 205-217.
Carey, M., & Forsyth, A. (2015). Teaching tip sheet: Self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/education/self-efficacy.aspx
Clemens, E. (2007). Developmental counseling and therapy as a model for school counselor consultation with teachers. Professional School Counseling, 10(4), 352-359.
Crews, C. R. (2006). The relationship between personal strain and special education teacher perceptions of collective teacher self-efficacy: Implications for counselors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Texas A&M University-Commerce.
Corey, G. (2009). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (eighth edition). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Coronado, J. M. (2011). Stressors that beginning teachers encounter. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(4), 43-45.
Cox, T., Kuk, G., Leiter, M., (1993). Burnout, health, work stress, and organizational healthiness. In W.B. Schaufeli, W., Maslach, C., Marek, T. (Eds.). Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research. Series in applied psychology: Social issues and questions, (pp. 177-193). Philadelphia, PA, US: Taylor & Francis.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
102
Curry, J. R., & O'Brien, E. R. (2012). Shifting to a wellness paradigm in teacher education: A promising practice for fostering teacher stress reduction, burnout resilience, and promoting retention. Ethical Human Psychology & Psychiatry, 14(3), 178-191.
Curtis, C. (2012). Why do they choose to teach – and why do they leave? A study of middle school and high school mathematics teachers. Education, 132(4), 779-788.
Dagli, U.Y., (2012). America’s public school kindergarten teachers’ job turnover and associated factors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 3121-3134.
Duffin, L. C., French, B. F., & Patrick, H. (2012). The teachers' sense of efficacy scale: Confirming the factor structure with beginning pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28(6), 827-834.
Dumville, J., Torgerson, D., & Hewitt, C. (2006). Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 332(7547), 969–971.
Edwards, H. S. (2015). Leaving tests behind. Time, 185(5), 28-31.
Ellis, A. (2001). Stress counselling: A rational emotive behaviour approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Los Angeles i.e. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fisher, M. H. (2011). Factors influencing stress, burnout, and retention of secondary teachers. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/
Froeschle, J. G., & Crews, C. R. (2010). Examining teacher perspectives of creative relaxation. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(3), 290-304.
Forman, S. G. (1990). Rational-emotive therapy: Contributions to teacher stress management. School Psychology Review, 19(3), 315-321.
Gates, G. S., & Wolverton, M. (2002). Toward wellness: prevention, coping, and stress. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Pub., [2002].
Gil-Monte, P. R., Peiró, J. M., & Valcárcel, P. (1998). A model of burnout process development: An alternative from appraisal models of stress. Comportamento Organizacional E Gestão, 4(1), 165.
Gold, E., Smith, A., Hopper, I., Herne, D., Tansey, G., & Hulland, C. (2010). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for primary school teachers. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 19(2), 184-189.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
103
Gold, T., & Roth, R. (1993). Teachers managing stress and preventing burnout: The professional health solution. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Harris, G. E. (2011). Individual stress management coursework in Canadian teacher preparation programs. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(4), 104-117.
Hartwick, J. M., & Kang, S. J. (2013). Spiritual practices as a means of coping with and ameliorating stress to reduce teacher attrition. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 22(2), 165-188.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb's experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185-95.
Hettler, B. (1976). The six dimensions of wellness model. Retrieved from http://www.nationalwellness.org/?page=Six_Dimensions
Hettler, B. (1976). The six dimensions of wellness model handout. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nationalwellness.org/resource/resmgr/docs/ sixdimensionsfactsheet.pdf
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2014). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force (#RR-80). Retrieved from Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report website: http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/workingpapers/ 1506_7trendsapril2014.pdf
Jenkins, J. M. (2014). Pre-service teachers' observations of experienced teachers. Physical Educator, 71(2), 303-319.
Kaspereen, D. (2012). Relaxation intervention for stress reduction among teachers and staff. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 238-250.
Kipps-Vaughan, D. (2013). Supporting teachers through stress management. Education Digest, 79(1), 43-46.
Kolb, D.A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Lee, R., & Ashforth, B. (1990). On the meaning of Maslach's three dimensions of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 743-747. Retrieved from PsycINFO Database Record.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
104
Leiter, M., & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(4), 297-308.
Leung, S., Chiang, V., Chui, Y., Mak, Y., & Wong, D. (2011). A brief cognitive-behavioral stress management program for secondary school teachers. Journal of Occupational Health, 53(1), 23-35.
Lunney, M. (2006). Stress Overload: A new diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies & Classifications, 17(4), 165-175.
Maslach, C. Jackson, S. E. & Leiter, M. P. (1996). MBI: The Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
McGrath, J. E. (1970). A conceptual formulation for research on stress. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), Social and psychological factors in stress (pp. 10-21). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Miller, L. H., Smith, A. D., & Rothstein, L. (1993). The stress solution: An action plan to manage the stress in your life. New York: Pocket Books.
Mertler, C., & Vannatta, R. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (3rd ed.). Glendale, California: Pyrczak Publishing.
Metcalf, L. (2008). Counseling toward solutions: a practical solution-focused program for working with students, teachers, and parents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, [2008].
McCarthy, C. J., Lambert, R. G., O'Donnell, M., & Melendres, L. T. (2009). The relation of elementary teachers' experience, stress, and coping resources to burnout symptoms. Elementary School Journal, 109(3), 282-300.
Molnar, A., & De Shazer, S. (1987). Solution-focused therapy: Toward the identification of therapeutic tasks. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 13(4), 349-358.
Osipow, S.H. (1998) Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised edition (OSI-R) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Osipow, S., & Spokane, A., (1981, 1998). Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised. Retrieved from http://www4.parinc.com/Products/Product.aspx?ProductID=OSI-R#Items
Pas, E.T., Bradshaw, C.P., Hershfeldt, P.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2010). A multilevel exploration of the influence of teacher efficacy and burnout on a response to student problem
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
105
behavior and school-based service use. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(1), 13-27.
Pelsma, D. M. (2000). School counselors' use of solution-focused questioning to improve teacher work life. Professional School Counseling, 4(1), 1.
Perda, D. (2013). Transitions into and out of teaching: A longitudinal analysis of early career teacher turnover (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Post, S. (2009). Texas Tech Named a Best in the West College by the Princeton Review (Tech is the Best in West). Retrieved from http://today.ttu.edu/posts/ 2009/08/princeton-review-tech-is-best-in-west
Project Share (2015). Retrieved from http://projectsharetexas.org/search-standards
Rebell, M. A. (2012). The right to comprehensive educational opportunity. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 47(1), 47.
Sass, D. A., Flores, B. B., Claeys, L., & Perez, B. (2012). Identifying personal and contextual factors that contribute to attrition rates for Texas public school teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(15), 1-30.
Seal-Nyman, K. (2015). Strong Regional Recruitment Strategy Key to Competing for Texas Students (map big). Retrieved from http://www.depts.ttu.edu/ communications/newsletter/images/07Mar/map_big.jpg
Sharit, J. & Salvendy, G. (1982). Occupational Stress: Review and reappraisal. Human Factors, 24(2), 129-162.
Shimazu, A., Okada, Y., Sakamoto, M., & Miura, M. (2003). Effects of Stress Management Program for Teachers in Japan: A pilot study. Journal of Occupational Health, 45(4), 202-208.
Slavin, R. (2007). Educational research in an age of accountability. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson.
Statistic Brain Research Institute (2015). Stress Statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.statisticbrain.com/stress-statistics/
Stauffer, S. & Mason, E. (2013). Addressing elementary school teachers’ professional stressors: Practical suggestions for schools and administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 809-837.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
106
Struyven, K., & Vanthournout, G. (2014). Teachers' exit decisions: An investigation into the reasons why newly qualified teachers fail to enter the teaching profession or why those who do enter do not continue teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 37-45.
Tatar, M. (2009). Teachers turning for help to school counsellors and colleagues: Toward a mapping of relevant predictors. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(2), 107-127.
Texas Tech University Tech Teach. (Spring 2015). Teacher candidate handbook: Hill country districts: Lubbock districts.
Texas Administration Code, 37 TexReg 5764 & 39 TexReg 3709. §§ 232.11 (2012 & 2014).
Texas Education Agency (2007-2015). Renewing my standard certificate. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/Texas_Educators/Certification/ Certification_Renewals/Renewing_My_Standard_Certificate/
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A.W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. Retrieved from http://u.osu.edu/hoy.17/files/2014/09/TSES-+-scoring-zted8m.pdf
Tye, B. B., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession? The Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 24-32.
U.S. Department of Education (2015, October 05). Programs: Improving basic programs operated by local educational agencies (Title I, Part A). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/index.html
Wadlington, E. E. (1998). Alleviating stress in pre-service teachers during field experiences. Education, 119(2), 335.
Wilkins-Canter, E. A., Edwards, A. T., Young, A. L., Ramanathan, H., McDougle, K.O. (2000). Preparing novice teachers to handle stress. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 36(3), 128-130.
Varvogli, L., & Darviri, C. (2011). Stress management techniques: Evidence-based procedures that reduce stress and promote health. Health Science Journal, 5(2), 74-89.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
107
Vesely, A. K., Saklofske, D. H., & Nordstokke, D. W. (2014). EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 81.
Yacapsin, M. (2010). Self care helps student teachers to deal with stress. Women in Higher Education, 19(10). 29.
Zurlo, M. C., Pes, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2007). Stress in teaching: A study of occupational stress and its determinants among Italian schoolteachers. Stress and Health, 23(4), 231-241.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
108
APPENDICES
Appendix A Recruitment Envelope Materials-Flyer
Stress Management and Self-Care Research Study
Be part of a stress-free research study! ▪ Are 18 years or older? ▪ Do you want to get relief from stress and learn new ways to take care of yourself? ▪ Do you want to help advocate for your profession? If you answered YES to these questions, you may be eligible to participate in an educational research study. The purpose of this hour and forty-five minute voluntary research project is to examine student teachers’ stress levels and teach you different stress management and self-care skills. Adults (18 years or older) are eligible to participate. This study is being conducted at Texas Tech University’s College of Education in a specified room and time.
Please go to a specified room after you are dismissed from class TODAY for more details! Don’t forget to bring the packet that was handed to you before class!
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Macy.waltz@ttu.edu janet.froeschle@ttu.edu
Rememberthisguy?(Dr.Crews)
⏎ Hespoketoyouatyourin-servicebackin
August.Hetoldyouaboutanopportunity
cominguptobeinvolvedinaresearch
studyaboutstress!Wellthetimehas
come!Belowyouwillseeafewdetails
aboutthestudy.Ihopetoseeyouafter
classisdismissedtosharemore
information!
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
109
Appendix B Recruitment Envelope Materials-Participant Instructions
o Please read the gift card information.
o Next, read the Letter to Participants and Informed Consent form
following the gift card information. If you agree to it sign it and
continue to read through the instructions.
o Please PRINT your name and email address on the notecard
stapled to your informed consent. Place ONLY the signed
informed consent and notecard back in the envelope. The Student
Co-PI or research assistant will ask for it later.
o Once you have completed all of the instructions please hand your
envelope to the research or research assistant.
o The Student Co-PI, Macy Waltz, will give you more information
via email about when training will take place and other details
about this research project.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
110
Appendix C Recruitment Envelopment Materials-Gift Card Information
Gift Card!!!!
If you choose to participate in this study you will be entered into a drawing for a $50.00 Target gift card funded by the Student Co-PI. After signing the informed consent, the notecard you write your name on will be added into the drawing. A
name will be drawn on a specified date! The winner will receive an email on how to access their Target gift card.
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University Macy.waltz@ttu.edu janet.froeschle@ttu.edu
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
111
Appendix D Recruitment Envelope Materials- Letter to Participants
Date College of Education Texas Tech University Box Lubbock, Texas 79409 Dear Student Teacher, I am asking you to be a participant in a research study to help me with my dissertation work. If you consent to participate in the study, I will ask you to complete three assessments and a demographic survey at three different times. The wellness training with the pretest and posttest will take 90 minutes. The delayed posttest will take 15 minutes of your time. By completing the following documents you are helping me meet the requirements for my PhD at Texas Tech University. You will also be advocating for new teachers and experienced teachers to get the support necessary to cope with stress. School counselors and community counselors will be able to devise a specific program for teachers regarding stress management and self-care skills through your participation in this study. If you would like to participate, please read the next document for further instructions. Thank you for taking the time to read the following materials! I sincerely hope you will be a participant in my study. Sincerely, Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
112
Appendix E Recruitment Envelope Materials- Informed Consent Form
Counselor Education and Supervision
Texas Tech University Informed Consent Form
Title: The Efficacy of a Stress Management and Self-Care Training on Student Teachers’ Stress Levels Student Co-PI: Macy Waltz, M.Ed., LPC-Intern What is this project studying? The study is called “The Efficacy of a Stress Management and Self-Care Training on Student Teachers’ Stress Levels.” The purpose of this hour and forty-five minute voluntary research project is to examine student teachers’ stress levels and teach you different stress management and self-care skills. The Student Co-PI will be examining psychological strain, coping resources, self-efficacy, and stress overload through the use of three instruments. Others in the teaching and counseling profession may learn how to help new teachers cope with similar past issues through this research project. The Student Co-PI hopes to publish this study widely to make it as beneficial as possible for teachers and counselors. What would I do if I participate? You will be asked to share answers about your experiences with stress as a student teacher. Each question will be about you, how you feel, and what you experienced. First, you will give consent to participate in the study. Then you will provide the Student Co-PI with your name and email address on a notecard. Next, you will receive an email from the Student Co-PI for more details about the research project. The Student Co-PI will tell you the time, date, and location of the research project. During the project you will (1) answer questions about demographics, (2) answer questions regarding psychological strain, personal resources, stress overload, and self-efficacy. You will take a pretest and then participate in a wellness training. Immediately after the training you will take a posttest. A delayed posttest will be offered four weeks later with the same questions on a specified date. Participants can volunteer to take this posttest and will be asked to give consent again before filling out information in the research packet. How will I benefit from participating? Besides providing the study with valuable information, you will learn different ways to cope with stress and improve your self-care skills. This training will also benefit you throughout your student teaching and teaching career. In addition to learning new skills, you will have an opportunity to win a $50.00 Target gift card. Student teachers who give written consent and write their name and email address on the notecard will be entered into a drawing for a $50.00 Target gift card. The Student Co-PI will draw one name on a specified date. Can I quit if I become uncomfortable? Yes, your participation is completely voluntary. Dr. Hicks-the study’s primary investigator, the Institutional Review Board, and I have reviewed the questions and think you can answer them
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
113
comfortably. However, you may skip any question(s) you do not feel comfortable answering and/or you can stop answering the questions at any time. You can also leave any time you wish. Participating is your choice. However, we do appreciate any help you are able to provide. How long will participation take? The wellness training with the pretest and posttest will take 90 minutes. The delayed posttest will take 15 minutes of your time. How are you protecting privacy? Your name will not be linked to any documentation and any use of this material in reports, publications or presentations will never be associated with participants in this study without permission. No one other than the Student Co-PI and her methodologist associated with this project will have access to the raw data. All related documentation will be stored either in a locked file cabinet in the Student Co-PI’s office or on a password protected computer. Your notecard and informed consent forms will be protected and kept confidential. Your notecard will only be used for the purpose of contacting you about the research project, assigning you to a treatment group and drawing the winner for the $50 gift card. All notecards will be permanently discarded after the winner of the drawing has been contacted about the gift card. The Student Co-PI and the dissertation committee’s methodologist of this study can only access the data. Data analysis will be completely anonymous. Raw data from this research project may be used for future publications outside of this project for my dissertation, but your name will not be linked to any documentation without permission. I have some questions about this study. Who can I ask?
o The study is being conducted under the supervision of Dr. Janet Froeschle Hicks
from the Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership at Texas Tech
University. If you have questions, you can reach her at janet.froeschle@ttu.edu or
Macy Waltz at macy.waltz@ttu.edu.
o Texas Tech University also has a Board that protects the rights of people who
participate in research. You can reach the board for further questions at 806-742-
2064. You can also mail your questions to the Human Research Protection
Program, Office of the Vice President for Research, Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, Texas 79409 or email them to hrpp@ttu.edu.
Please sign and print your name below if you would like to participate in my study and agree with the information provided in this informed consent form.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
114
________________________________________ ____________________ Signature Date ________________________________________ Printed Name
This consent form is not valid after a specified date.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
115
Appendix F Research Packet Materials- Packet Instructions
Packet Instructions
By completing the following documents you are helping me to complete my Ph.D. at Texas Tech University. Thank you for participating and helping me not only graduate, but also be able to provide materials that may help future teachers cope with stress in healthier ways.
1. Please fill out the enclosed research items completely:
a. Demographic Survey
b. Stress Overload Scale
c. Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form)
d. Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Personal Strain Questionnaire
and Personal Resources Questionnaire
2. Once you have fully completed all of the documents please put them back in the
envelope provided and place it in the container located in the front of the room.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
116
Appendix G Research Packet Materials- Demographic Survey
ID: ____________________
(Print clearly)
Demographic Survey
Do not write your name on this survey. Instructions: Please write your answer in the blank provided or place an X by your answer choice. Age: Gender: ______ ___ Male ___ Female ___ I prefer not to answer
Ethnicity: (Mark more than one if needed) ___ American Indian or Alaskan Native Teaching Certification Level: ___ Asian ___ Primary ___ Black or African American ___ Middle ___ Hispanic/ Latino ___ Secondary ___ Caucasian ___ All Levels (i.e. Physical Education) ___ I prefer not to answer Education: Relationship Status: (Please mark the highest level achieved) ___ Single ___ High School Graduate ___ Married ___ Some college ___ Dating ___ Associates Degree ___ Widowed ___ Bachelors Degree ___ Divorced/ Separated ___ Graduate Degree ___ Living with a partner Number of Children: GPA: ______ ______ Block: Type of school you are placed at for student teaching: ______ ___ Title I ___Not Title I
Macy Waltz Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
117
Appendix H Training Materials-PowerPoint Presentation and Commentary
Stress Management and Self-Care Training for Student Teachers
PowerPoint Presentation with Commentary
Slide 1: Title Slide
ì
StressManagementandSelf-CareTrainingforStudentTeachers
MacyWaltz,M.Ed.,LPC-Intern,Doctoral
CandidateMacyWaltz,LPC-Intern,PhDCandidate
Slide 2: Activity: Think, Write, Pair, Share
ì Prompt:Whatcausesyoustress?
ì 30secondstothink
ì 1minutetowrite
ì 1.5minutestopair
ì 1minutetoshare
Activity:Think,Write,Pair,Share
Eachtablewillhavepens/pencils/markers,smallsheetsofpaper,andonelargepieceofpaper.Pre-serviceteacherswillbeaskedtositatonlytableswiththesematerialsonthem.
1. Before diving into the topic, do a short activity. Ask the pre-service teachers to
get into a group of 5-6 people (or work with the people at your table).
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
118
2. Have each person do this part individually. Ask them to grab a pen/pencil and
piece of paper and write down what causes them stress.
3. Now pair up with one other person, if one group needs three people that is fine.
Now share with one another some of the causes of your stress.
4. Combine your answers and make a top 10 list.
5. Now ask each group to come together with their smaller group top 10 lists.
6. As a whole group (or table), combine the small group answers and come up with a
top 10 group list.
7. Discuss what type of answers each group wrote down. Some might have said
family, friends, work, or finances. From their answers, you can see many things
can cause stress.
8. Next, you will explain to students what stress means.
Whydothisactivity?Itrequiresastudenttothinkforhimorherself,thenshowfurtherunderstandingofthetopicbywritingit.Studentsarethenaskedtopairwithothergroupmemberstoranktheiranswers.Studentsareworkingtogethertosharetheirknowledgeandcompleteatasksimultaneously.Thisgoesbacktotheoldsaying:“Thestudenthasnowbecometheteacher.”
Everyteacherwantstheirstudentstohaveadeepunderstandingofwhatinformationisbeingtaughtduringclass.Itstudentsareabletothinkforthemselves,writedownwhattheyknow(classassignments,applyingknowledge),sharewithotherstudentsthisknowledge,andfinallyshare(teach)otherstudentshowtobetterunderstanditforhimorherself,thenteachersknowtheyhavesuccessfullytaughttheconceptwell.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
119
Slide 3: Goals and Expectations
GoalsandExpectations
ì Goalsofthetrainingsessionì Teachstudentteachers:
ì Effectivestrategiestocopewithstressì Waystopromoteself-careintotheirdailylives
ì Expectationsbytheendofthetrainingì Studentteacherswillhaveabetterunderstandingof
stress,strain,wellness,andself-careì Studentteacherswillbeabletointegratewellness
techniquesintotheirprofessionalandpersonallives
Reviewexpectationswithpre-serviceteachersbeforestartingthetraining.Makesureyourepeattheexpectationsthroughoutthetrainingifyouseepre-serviceteachersnotactingaccordingly.
Slide 4: Expectations: Training
Expectations:Training
ì Participateinactivities.
ì Beactiveandtakenotes.
ì Pleaseputawayalldistractions:cellphones,Ipads,laptops,etc.duringtraining.
ì Berespectfulandpayattention.
Readtheslidetoparticipants.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
120
Slide 5: Overview
Overview
ì Objective1:ì Toeducateyouonstressandhowprevalentitisinsociety.
ì Objective2:ì Tounderstandthetermsstrain,wellness,andself-care.
ì Objective3:ì Toseehowstress,strain,wellness,andself-careconnectwiththe
teachingprofession.
ì Objective4:ì Tolearnafewtechniquesthatcanbeappliedtoyoupersonally
andprofessionally.
Readtheslidetoparticipants.
Slide 6: Stress
Stress
“Aperceived,substantialimbalancebetweendemandandresponsecapability,under
conditionswherefailuretomeetthedemandhasimportant,perceivedconsequences.”
ì Threetypes:Acute,EpisodicAcute,andChronicStress
Gothroughthefollowing:
10. Three types: Acute stress, episodic acute stress and chronic stress
• Acute Stress: most common form, short term.
o Comes from the pressures and demands of life.
o Example: child’s problems at school, upcoming school tests or deadlines
from work.
• Episodic Acute Stress: those who suffer acute stress frequently
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
121
o Feeling you are always in a rush, but always late; those who have a lot of
“nervous energy”, ceaseless worry
o These people may experience persistent tension headaches, migraines,
chest pains, and other symptoms
• Chronic Stress: known as the never ending stress
o It can be caused by dysfunctional families, an unhappy job or career, or
poverty among other reasons.
o This type of stress can have adverse symptoms, which could lead to
suicide, disease, heart attack, stroke, or possibly cancer.
o Treating chronic stress may require medical and behavioral treatment, as
well as stress management
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stress
Slide 7: Stress and Statistics 2015
StressandStatistics2015
ì 77% ofpeopleregularlyexperiencephysicalsymptomscausedbystress
ì 73%regularlyexperiencepsychologicalsymptomscausedbystress
ì 33%feeltheyarelivingwithextremestress
ì 48%feeltheirstresshasincreasedoverthepastfiveyears
ì 48%saystresshasanegativeimpactontheirpersonalandprofessionallife
ì Employersspend300billiondollarsannuallyinstressrelatedhealthcarecostsandmissedwork
Reviewstatisticswithpre-serviceteachers.AllstatisticslistedaredatafromtheUnitedStates.
http://www.statisticbrain.com/stress-statistics/
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
122
Slide 8: Stress Awareness
StressAwareness
Howdoyouknowwhenyouarestressed?ì Physicallyì Emotionallyì Mentally
Whatsymptomsmightyoubeshowing?ì Areyouawareoftheseverityofeachone?ì Symptomexamples:sleepdisturbance,fatigue,
irritability,muscletension,headaches,difficultyconcentrating,isolation,increasedordecreasedappetite
Thinkaboutthefollowingquestions…
• How do you know when you are stressed?
• What is your body telling you on a physical, emotional, and mental level?
• Are you aware of the symptoms and the severity of each one?
Hereareafewstresssymptomspeoplecanexhibit…
Ifthesesymptomscontinue,theimpactonaperson’soverallwellnesscouldbedetrimental.
Slide 9: What happens if you continue this stress cycle?
Whathappensifyoucontinuethisstresscycle?
ì Ongoingstresscaneffect:ì Academicworkì Studentteaching(on-site)ì Relationships
ì PsychiatricProblemsì Anxietydisordersì Mooddisorders
ì PsychologicalDistress
ì Burnout
Discussion:
Askpre-serviceteachershowstresscanimpact…
• School? Grades, motivation
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
123
• Work? Effectiveness, motivation, co-workers or relationship with other students,
environment
• Relationships? Family, friends, significant others
Slide 10: Strain
Strain
“Whenstressstartsinterferingwithyourabilitytoliveanormallifeforan
extendedperiod.”
“Theresultofchronicstress”
Readthedefinitions.
(APA,2013;Gold&Roth,1993)
Slide 11: What can you do NOW to help you in the FUTURE?
WhatcanyoudoNOWtohelpyouintheFUTURE?
Readthisquestiontoparticipants.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
124
Slide 12: What is Wellness?
WhatisWellness?
“Wellnessisanactiveprocessthroughwhichpeoplebecomeawareof,and
makechoicestoward,amoresuccessfulexistence.”
Itisanactiveprocesstobeawareofinordertohaveamoresuccessfulexistence.
Itistheoverallideaofgoodhealth.
http://www.nationalwellness.org/?page=Six_Dimensions
Slide 13: What is Self-Care?
WhatisSelf-care?
“Regularactivitiesanindividualengagesinwhichreduceoralleviatechronic
stress.”
Self-careishowyouactuallygetthere.
Thestepsyoutakeyouachievewellness.
Theactivitiesyoupracticedailyinordertohelpyourselfasanindividual.
"self-care."ADictionaryofNursing.2008.RetrievedFebruary20,2015fromEncyclopedia.com:http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O62-selfcare.html
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
125
Slide 14: What do you know about self-care?
Whatdoyouknowaboutself-care?
Thingstothinkabout…
ì Doyoupracticeself-carenow?
ì Howdoyoupracticeit?
ì Whyisthisimportant?
ì Doyoubelieveallcurrentpeople/teachers/collegestudentsarepracticingitasmuchastheyshould?
Gothrougheachquestionandsayitoutloudtoparticipants.Thisslideisnotusedforadiscussion,onlytoguideparticipants’thoughtsonself-care.
Slide 15: Help!
Help!
Scenario:
Asecondaryschoolteacherhas30studentsinhishighschoolalgebraclass.Itisthedaybeforea6weektestandallofthestudentsarecomplainingaboutnotfeelingprepared.Theteacherhastoturningradessoon,butfeelspressurebecauseitisadistrictbenchmarktest.Someofthestudentshavemissedinstructionaltimeandhavebeenabsentthroughoutthe6weeks,andothershavenotbeenturningintheirhomework.Theteacherhasadaytoprepareforthetestandaweektocorrectgrades,gradelate/busywork,helpstudentswhowereabsent,andprepareforthenext6weeks.
Askstudentstogetintoagroupof3-4people.Tellthemtowritedownafewwaysthisteachermightexpressstresssymptoms.After2-3minutesaskforafewvolunteerstosharetheiranswers.Next,gooverafewpointsfromthisexample.
• A teacher may show the following signs if found in this situation…
• Physically, your heart might race, your hands become clammy or sweaty, you
shake, your breathing becomes rapid and shallow, your jaw tightens, and you
might become light-headed.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
126
• Behaviorally, you might stutter, look down, or avoid eye contact with the
audience.
• Cognitively or mentally, your mind may go blank, or alternatively your thoughts
might race wildly. You might have thoughts about making a mistake or looking
ridiculous in front of your peers.
• Emotionally, you might feel very anxious or fearful.
Slide 16: Teachers and Stress
TeachersandStress
ì Behindthesceneswork
ì Dealingwithconfrontation
ì Negotiatingchaos
ì Wearingmanyhats
ì Professionalandpersonalbalance
Gothroughthisdiscussionquickly.Onlyaskfor1-2volunteer’sanswersperquestion.
• What kind of behind the scenes work do teachers experience?
• How often do teachers deal with confrontation each day?
• The workload can feel overwhelming, but teachers have to make choices in the
midst of chaos
• What hats do teachers wear? educator, babysitter, parent, disciplinarian,
counselor, academic advisor
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
127
• What kind of responsibilities do teachers have to balance? They are constantly
multi-tasking.
Slide 17: Let’s see how you are doing now!
Let’sseehowyouaredoingnow!
Readthisslidetoparticipants.
Slide 18: Six Dimensions of Wellness
SixDimensionsofWellness
ì Physical
ì Intellectual/Mental
ì Emotional
ì Spiritual
ì Social
ì Occupational
Activity:SolutionFocusedBriefTherapytechnique(SFBT)
Gothroughthebackground:
• -Developed by Dr. Bill Hettler, co-founder of the National Wellness Institute
(NWI).
• -Wellness can help people reach their full potential.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
128
• -This is a holistic wellness model. Notice it looks at six dimensions of a person’s
life through the categories listed above.
• -Wellness is positive and affirming.
• -This model is going to lead us through our next self-care activity.
Slide 19: Self-Care Survey: Step 1
Self-CareSurvey:Step1
ì Browsethrougheachcategoryì Thinkaboutwhattypeofactionscanfitintoeach
category
ì Writedownwhatactionsyouhavetakeninthelastweekforeachone.
AskstudentstotakeouttheSelf-CareSurveyworksheet.MakesurethepageisonStep1.Gothroughthedirections.ExplaintostudentsthatwewillgothrougheachdimensiontogetherforStep1.Makesuretheyrememberthisstepisfocusingonactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweek.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
129
Slide 20: Physical
Physical
ì Exerciseì Running,liftingweights,yoga,crossfit,zumba,fitness
classes
ì Dietì Water,mealplans,eating3-6mealsaday,caffeine
intake
ì Sleepì 7-10hoursofsleeppernight
ThefirstdimensionwewilllookatisPhysical.Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.(Thesedirectionswillberepeatedforeachdimension)
Slide 21: Intellectual/Mental
Intellectual/Mental
ì Completingcrosswordpuzzles
ì Learninganewskill
ì CompletingProfessionalDevelopmentactivities
ì Painting/drawing
TheseconddimensionwewilllookatisIntellectual/Mental.Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
130
Slide 22: Emotional
Emotional
ì Writinginajournal
ì Receivingcounseling
ì Relyingonsupportiverelationships
ì Usingpositiveself-talk
ì Receivingmentoring
ì Learningandusingcopingskills
ThethirddimensionwewilllookatisEmotional.Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.
Slide 23: Spiritual
Spiritual
ì Meditating
ì Praying
ì Attendingchurch
ì Attendingasmallgroup
ì Practicingquiettime
ThefourthdimensionwewilllookatisSpiritual.Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
131
Slide 24: Social
Social
ì Goingonvacationwithfamilyandfriends
ì Participatinginbookclubs
ì Playingonanintramuralsportsteam
ì Volunteering
ThefifthdimensionwewilllookatisSocial.Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.
Slide 25: Occupational
Occupational
ì Arrivingtostudentteaching(on-site)ontime,leavingstudentteaching(on-site)ontime
ì Avoidingprocrastinating
ì Askingforhelp
ì ProfessionalDevelopmentopportunities
ì Leavingworkatworkandprotectingyourhomespace
ì Respectingpeopleandenvironment
ì Demonstratingastrongworkethic
ThesixthandfinaldimensionwewilllookatisOccupational.Explaintoparticipantsthatthisdimensionwillfocusonpre-serviceteachers’timeinstudentteaching.Forexample,asastudentteacherareyouarrivingtoschoolontime?Areyouaskingyourprofessors,in-serviceteachers,andfellowpre-serviceteachersforhelp?Askparticipantswhatactionstheyhavetakeninthelastweekthatwouldfitintothisdimension.Sharewiththemafewexamplesfromtheslidetogiveparticipantsideasofwhatdowritedown.Explaintothemthesearejustexamplesandtherearemultipleotherwaystofulfillthisdimension.Onlyprovide1-2minutesperdimension.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
132
Slide 26: Self-Care Survey: Step 2
Self-CareSurvey:Step2
ì Flipoveryourworksheetandbrowsethrougheachcategoryì Takeamomentandthinkaboutwhatactionsyouwrotein
eachcategoryforStep1
ì Whatwouldyouliketochange/addtoeachcategorytoaccomplishforthenextfourweeks?
*Remember- makethegoalsrealistic. Youcanalwaysmakechangeslater
Explainthatmanyofthesecategoriesoverlap.Forinstance,somepeoplefindthatrunningafewmilesaweekhelpsthememotionallyandmentally.AskparticipantstolookoverStep1oncemore.Theywillthenbeaskedtoturntheworksheetover.OnthebackisStep2ofthisactivity,whichwillfocusonwhatstudentswanttochangeoraddtoeachdimension.Askstudentstosetsomegoalsforeachcategorytomeetoverthenextfourweeks.Forexample,forthePhysicaldimensiononegoalmightbetoworkout2-3timesperweekforatleast30minutes.Aparticipantcanwritedownwhatdaysoftheweekheorsheplanstoworkoutandthetime.Remindparticipantstomakerealisticgoalsandtotrytheirbesttoaccomplisheachoneoverthenextfourweeks.Thepurposeofthistechniqueisforparticipantstounderstandwhatareaoftheirlifetheymightnotbetakingcareofverywell.Participantscanseewhattheyaredoingnowandthenmakeappropriatechangesbysettinggoalstoincreasetheiroverallwellness.Nextwewillwalkthroughfourtechniquestohelpparticipantsmanagestress.
Slide 27: Coping with Stress
CopingwithStress
ì ProgressiveMuscleRelaxation
ì RationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapy
ì Breathing
ì GuidedImagery
Explaintostudentshoweachoneofthesetechniquescanhelpthemmanagestresslevels.Itisimportanttotakethetimetopracticeeachtechniqueinordertogetthebenefits.ThefirstonetechniqueiscalledProgressiveMuscleRelaxation.ForthesakeofthistrainingitwillbecalledPMR.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
133
Slide 28: Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR)
ProgressiveMuscleRelaxation(PMR)
ì Atechniqueusedforreducingstressandanxietybyalternatelytensingandrelaxingthemuscles
ì Activity:PMRtechnique
Onewaytoreduceanxietyisbylearninghowtorelaxanymusculartension.Explaintostudentsthatsometimesapersonisunawareofhowstressedoutheorshereallyis.Mostofthetimeourbodycangiveanideaofhowstressedoutapersonfeels.Forexample,imaginesittingatacomputerforhoursatatime.Apersonmaystarttoexperiencesometightnessinhisorherbackmuscles,shoulders,orevengetaheadache.Thistechniquehelpsapersonbecomeawareoftheirbody’stension.Itfocusesontensingandrelaxingspecificmuscles;wewillgothrougheachmusclegrouponeatatime.Iaskthatyoufullyparticipateintheactivityanddonotdistractothersduringit.
Explaintoparticipantsthatiftheyfullyparticipatenow,itwillbemucheasierwhentheydoitalonebecausetheywillknowexactlywhattodo.
• Let’s begin. Please close your eyes. Keep them closed throughout the entire
activity. We are going to start with the feet and move up to the head and neck.
• I am going to ask you to tighten and relax each muscle group for 10 seconds each
(make sure the facilitator has a stop watch for this activity). I want you to focus
on the distinction between the feelings of tension and relaxation. Let’s start with
your feet.
• Continue to keep your eyes closed. I want you to tighten your feet as tight as you
can for 10 seconds. Now relax your feet for 10 seconds. Notice the difference
between when your feet were tightened and relaxed.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
134
• Now I want you to tighten your calves as tight as you can (10 seconds). Relax (10
seconds).
• Tighten your thighs as tight as you can (10 seconds). Relax (10 seconds).
• Tighten your Gluteus Maximus and abdomen as tight as you can (10 seconds).
Relax (10 seconds).
• Tighten your shoulders as tight as you can for 10 seconds. Relax for 10 seconds.
• Next tighten your arms and hands (similar to how the Hulk may look) for a few
seconds (10 seconds). Relax (10 seconds).
• Lastly, I want you to tighten your head and neck. Relax for 10 seconds.
Somepeopleusethistechniquetohelpthemfallasleepatnight.Justlikewedidafewminutesago,theystartwiththeirfeetandmovethrougheachmusclegroup.Ithelpsapersonfullyrelaxtheirbodysothattheycanfallasleep.Itcanbedoneanywhereandrequiresnospecialequipment.Itcanbeadaptedtofitthetimeframethatworksbestforyou.
Iusethistechniquewhilesittingonthecomputer.SometimesIwilltakeashortbreakandtightenmyshoulderslikewedidearlier,thenIwouldrelaxthem.IthelpsmegaugejusthowtensemymusclesarewhenIsitatthecomputer.ItalsoremindsmethatIneedtokeepmyshouldersrelaxedandtositupstraight.Everyonelovesgettingremindedabouthisorherposture!
Nextwewilllearnanactivitythatcanhelpyouwithcommunicationandconflictresolution.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
135
Slide 29: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT)
RationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapy(REBT)
ì REBTisaformofCognitiveBehaviorTherapy(CBT)
ì CBTbuildsasetofskillsthatenablesanindividualto:ì beawareofthoughtsandemotionsì identifyhowsituations,thoughts,andbehaviors
influenceemotionsì improvefeelingsbychangingdysfunctionalthoughtsand
behaviors
ì Activity:RationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapytechnique
WalkparticipantsthroughREBTandCBTbyusingtheslide’scontent.Explainthepurposeofthistypeoftherapy.Provideanexampleofhowaperson’sthoughtsandemotionscouldcausethemtomakeunhealthydecisions.Continuetothenextactivity.
Giveanexample:
• You receive a text in the middle of the night from a friend or family member
stating “Call me ASAP”. You call and no one answers. Your mind quickly jumps
from “I wonder what happened. What if they are hurt? What if someone got into
trouble? Should I book a flight home tonight?”
• Then you start to notice your emotions feeling more intense. You may feel
frightened, upset, mad they didn’t answer the phone. You notice your rapid
thoughts have quickly stirred up some intense emotions.
Weallhavethesemoments.Wherewejumpfromonethoughttothenext.Werealizelaterhowirrationalourthoughtpatternswereatthetime,andquicklywefeelreliefafterfindingouteverythingisokay.Nooneishurt.
Doyouseehowquicklythingscanescalatewithouremotionsoncethoserapid,irrationalthoughtsstart?Oftentimesthishappensmoreintenselyandfrequentlywhenonefeelsoverwhelmedorstressedout.REBTisjustonewaytoslowdownthosethoughtsandintenseemotions.Youwillseelaterinthispresentationhowtoapplyitintheclassroom.Thiscanalsobeusedinyourpersonalliveswithfriends,family,andinotherrelationships.
http://albertellis.org/rebt-cbt-therapy/
http://www.mirecc.va.gov/visn16/docs/Therapists_Guide_to_Brief_CBTManual.pdf
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
136
Slide 30: Scenario
Scenario
Astudentisusingfoullanguageinclassandtheteacheraskshimtocomeupwithanewwordtouseinstead.Thestudentcontinuestousefoullanguageafterbeingredirected.Thestudentisaskedtoleaveandbecomesdefiantbynotdoingwhattheteacheraskedofhim.Hedoesnotleavetheroomandhisbehaviorremainsthesame.
Askparticipantstoreadthescenario.After1-2minutesreaditaloudtothegroup.Tellparticipantstotakealookatthisscenario.Somemightfinditfamiliar.Thistypeofscenariocancauseteacherstofeelstressedoutbecausethestudentrefusestoleavetheclassroomandcontinuestodisruptinstructiontime.Whenfoundinstressfulsituations,teacherscanusetheRtechniquetohelpthemmanagetheiremotionsandrespondappropriately.Continuetothenextslide.
Slide 31: The R Technique
TheRtechnique
ì A:Rethink,Relax/Retreat,React
VS
ì B:Rethink,Relax/Retreat,Respond
Walkstudentsthroughthefollowingbullets.ExplainthattheRtechniqueiscomposedofthreeactions:Rethink,Relax/Retreat,React/Respond.TheR’sarenotinanyparticularorder.
• Which “R” in line “A” do you think is typically done first when a person deals
with conflict?
• Which one do you think would be the best to do first?
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
137
• Let’s go back to the situation you read earlier. If the teacher decided to yell back
at the student or REACTING to the situation, the teacher is not practicing healthy
communication and appropriate emotion management, because her feelings may
be running high.
• As a teacher, it is not beneficial to react out of a place of intense emotion.
• Every person is different when dealing with conflict. A person might need to
retreat/relax first and then rethink or vice versa.
• (Relax/Retreat or Rethink can happen first; the main idea is not to react first)
• Notice in line “B” the word REACT has been changed to respond.
• This is to signify that a healthy response is being made instead of an unhealthy
reaction.
• Allow the logical and rational side of yourself to be integrated into the emotional
side.
Thistechniquegivesteacherstheabilitytoslowdownsituationsandnottakethempersonally,butinsteadasaprofessionaldisagreementthatneedstobetakencareof.
Rememberthesituationfromearlier,howcanweapplytheRtechniquetohelptheteacherknowhowtorespondinahealthyway?Askfortwovolunteerstoanswer.
Thenexttechniqueissimpleandcanbepracticedanywhereatanytime.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
138
Slide 32: Breathing
Breathing
ì Abdominalordeepbreathingiswhenoneexpandstheabdomenratherthanthechestwhenbreathing.ì Learninghowtoinhaleandexhaledeeper
andslower
ì Activity:Breathingtechnique
Sometimeswhenapersonfeelsstressedoroverwhelmeditiseasytostopbreathingcorrectly.Apersonmayfindhimorherselfbreathingmorequicklythanusual,whichcanmakeemotionsseemmoreintense.Itcanalsocausethoughtstobecomemoreirrationalwithheightenedemotions.Whenfoundinastressfulsituation,onequickandeasythingtodoiscontrolyourbreathing.Let’swalkthroughashortbreathingexercisetogether.Makesuretofullyparticipateandnotdistractthosearoundyou.
Thefirstexerciseissimpleandrequiresyoutotakeslow,countedbreaths.
(1)DeepBreath.
• Slowly take a deep breath.
• Hold it for a count of four. Then, gently let it all out, letting tensions go as you
exhale.
• Sometimes our breathing becomes shallow as we become tense.
• A deep breath can help more oxygen enter our system, literally breathing more
life into ourselves.
Thesecondexerciserequiresyoutoequalizeyourbreathing.Wewillbreatheintoacountoffourandouttoacountoffour.
(2)EqualizedBreathing.
• Breathe in to a count of four and out to a count of four ("thousand 1, thousand 2,
thousand 3, thousand 4").
• Do that four or five times.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
139
• With tenseness, our breathing can become irregular.
• Slowing down and equalizing our inhalations and exhalations is calming.
Thelasttechniqueyouwilllearntodayiscalledguidedimagery.Iwilltalkyouthroughtheentiretechnique,butbesuretofollowthedirectionsIgiveyou.
Slide 33: Guided Imagery: (GI)
GuidedImagery(GI)
ì GIrelievespsychologicalstress,reducesbodytensionandrestoresenergytoanindividual.Itisguidedbyatherapist,trainerorrecording.
ì Activity:GuidedImagerytechnique
Readtheslidetoparticipants.GuidedImageryisusedtorelaxindividualsbyslowingdownthoughtsandfocusingonyou-mentally,physically,andemotionally.
• This activity may be new to some of you. It may seem a little weird, but I promise
if you focus on the words I say and do what actions I tell you to do it will be
worth it. You will feel very relaxed at the end. I only ask that you participate and
try your best to focus throughout the entire activity. If you find yourself
distracted, stop your thoughts and get focused back into the activity.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
140
• I am going to ask you to remove anything that may distract you during this time.
Point your chair towards the front of the room and sit up straight. Place both feet
on the floor and your hands in your lap. I will be playing some music in the
background. Focus on my words.
GuidedImageryscriptislocatedinAppendixJ.
Afterfinishingthescript,continuetothenextslide.
Kaspereen,D.(2012).Relaxationinterventionforstressreductionamongteachersandstaff.InternationalJournalofStressManagement,19(3),238-250.
Slide 34: Take-Away!
Take-Away!
ì SolutionFocusedBriefTherapy:SetgoalsforyourselfeachmonthbasedofftheSixDimensionsofWellness.Remembertowritedownwhatyouarecurrentlydoing(Step1)andwhatyouwouldliketoadd/changeforthefuture(Step2).ThemostimportantpartistoDOwhatyouwrotedowninStep2!
ì ProgressiveMuscleRelaxation:Checkyourselfdaily!Takeafewsecondsoutofyourdaytotenseandrelaxyourmusclesinordertogagehowstressedyoufeel.Thiscanbedoneanywhere!
ì RationalEmotiveBehaviorTherapy:REBThelpsyoubecomemoreproactivethanreactivebyencouragingyoutostopandprocessasituationbeforeresponding.ì Quicktip!:Retreat,Rethink,Respond(don’treact!).
Welearnedalotoftechniquestodaythatcanhelpyoudevelopandpracticeself-careandstressmanagement.Hereareafewtake-awaysfromeachtechnique.Writedowntheseideasandusethemwheneveryou’dlike!
Continuetonextslide.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
141
Slide 35: Take-Away!
Take-Away!
ì Breathing:Take5minutes3xsperdayandslowdownyourbreathing.Onlyfocusontakingadeepbreathinandlettingitout.Thiscanbedonebeforeschool,duringlunch,andafterschool.
ì GuidedImagery:BreathingandGuidedImagerycanbedonesimultaneously.YoucanevenaskyourstudentstoparticipateinGuidedImageryonceaweek.Thetimecanbeadjustedtofityouandyourstudents’needs.Thisactivityhasbeendoneinteacher’sclassroomsduringtheirhomeroomorfreeperiod.Teachersstartoffbyaskingtheirstudentstoparticipateforfiveminutesthefirsttime,andthengraduallyaddmoretimeoveraperiodofweeks.Teachershaveseenanimmediatedifferenceinclassroomswithstudent’senergylevelsandrespecttowardsoneanother.
Readthelasttwotake-aways.Encouragestudentstousethesetechniquestherestofthissemester.Continuetothelastslide.
Slide 36: Questions
Askparticipantsiftheyhaveanyquestions.Ifnot,proceedtotheposttestinstructionsfortheexperimentalgroup.
Slide 37: References 1
References
AmericanPsychologicalAssociation(2013).Howstressaffectsyourhealth.Washington,DC.Retrievedfrom:http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/stress-facts.pdf
AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.Stress:Thedifferentkindsofstress.Retrievedfrom:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stress
Cully,J.A.,&Teten,A.L.(2008).ATherapist’sGuidetoBriefCognitive BehavioralTherapy.Houston,TX: DepartmentofVeteransAffairsSouthCentralMIRECC.
Gold,T.,&Roth,R.(1993).Teachersmanagingstressandpreventingburnout:Theprofessionalhealthsolution.Washington,DC:TheFalmer Press.
Hettler,B.(1976).Thesixdimensionsofwellnessmodel.Retrievedfromhttp://www.nationalwellness.org/?page=Six_Dimensions
Kaspereen,D.(2012).Relaxationinterventionforstressreductionamongteachersandstaff.InternationalJournalofStressManagement,19(3),238-250.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
142
Slide 38: References 2
References
McGrath,J.E.(1970).Aconceptualformulationforresearchonstress.InJ.E.McGrath(Ed.),Socialandpsychologicalfactorsinstress (pp.10-21).NewYork:Holt,Rinehart,&Winston.
Miller,L.H.,Smith,A.D.,&Rothstein,L.(1993).Thestresssolution:Anactionplantomanagethestressinyourlife.NewYork:PocketBooks.
Osipow,S.H.(1998) OccupationalStressInventory-Revisededition(OSI-R)professionalmanual.Odessa,FL:PsychologicalAssessmentResources.
StatisticBrainResearchInstitute(2015).StressStatistics.Retrievedfrom:http://www.statisticbrain.com/stress-statistics/
TheAlbertEllisInstitute(2014).RationalEmotive&Cognitive-BehaviorTherapy. Retrievedfrom:http://albertellis.org/rebt-cbt-therapy/
Varvogli,L.,&Darviri,C.(2011).Stressmanagementtechniques:Evidence-basedproceduresthatreducestressandpromotehealth.HealthScienceJournal,5(2),74-89.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
143
Appendix I Training Materials-Solution Focused Brief Therapy Technique
Self-Care Survey: Step 1
Physical: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Intellectual/Mental: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Emotional: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Spiritual: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Social: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Occupational: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
144
Self-Care Survey: Step 2
Physical: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Intellectual/Mental: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Emotional: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Spiritual: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Social: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Occupational: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
145
Appendix J Training Materials- Relaxation Therapy Technique
Relaxation Therapy Technique Guided Imagery Script Location: Quiet room
Needed: Chairs CD player & CD
Please get comfortable in your seat. Get as comfortable as you possibly can. Keep your head straight and gently lift just your eyes to look up as high as you can and focus on a spot on the ceiling. It may feel difficult, but hold your eyes and stare at the spot. And as you stare at the spot, take in a nice deep breath, holding it as long as you can; and when you are ready, exhale slowly . . . very slowly. Take another deep breath in, holding it as long as you can; and again when you are ready, exhale slowly. You start to notice your eyes getting tired and watery. Your eyes feel heavy and watery and want to close down. Go ahead and allow your eyes to close down. Close your eyes. Imagine yourself at the top of a staircase or a mountain top somewhere out in nature. Whichever you feel most comfortable. You are at the very top. When you reach the bottom you will be at the bottom of deep relaxation. You are on Level 10 and move down to Level 9. As you imagine and visualize yourself moving down, you feel more relaxed. Let go of all your thoughts and all your cares. Moving down to Level 8; more and more relaxed; deeper and deeper into relaxation. You feel calm and relaxed. If any conscious thoughts come into your mind, just use the words calm and relaxed. Calm and relaxed. Moving down now to Level 7, imagining yourself moving down and feeling a sense of overwhelming peace and clarity, moving closer and closer to deep relaxation. Moving down now to Level 6; feeling more and more relaxed; deeper and deeper into relaxation. Continue letting go of all your thoughts and all your cares. Any sounds that you hear are just every day sounds of living; they only make you go deeper into relaxation. Moving down now to Level 5; you can see yourself moving down deeper and deeper into relaxation. Calm and relaxed. Calm and relaxed. Feeling more and more peaceful. Moving on down to Level 4, closer and closer, deeper and deeper into relaxation. Calm and relaxed, calm and relaxed. Moving on down to Level 3. Calm and relaxed. Deeper and deeper into relaxation. Moving down to Level 2, about to reach the bottom of deep relaxation. Step down now to Level 1. To the very bottom of relaxation feeling calm and relaxed. Imagine yourself at your most comfortable place. A place where you feel most comfortable and at peace. It can be at an ocean, a lake, a mountain, maybe your home. Imagine yourself sitting there or laying there taking in all the beauty. Using all of your senses, notice all the vibrant colors. Notice all the familiar smells. Hear all the familiar sounds at your most comfortable and peaceful place. Take in every aspect of this place that you may have missed and appreciate everything about it. (LONG PAUSE.) Now, just touch the tips of your thumb and forefinger together . . . just hold the tips of your fingers together. This is creating your anchor. You may use your anchor any time you need it; it will bring you
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
146
right back to this place, your most comfortable place and experience the same feelings of peace and clarity. This place is for you. A place to escape from reality, and take time to clear your mind and gain new peaceful insight. (LONG PAUSE.) You can let go of your anchor now. Imagine yourself in your office or your classroom. Picture yourself with a student or a classroom full of students or even a colleague or your supervisor and notice how peaceful you feel. Notice that your patience has increased. Notice how easily it is to handle stressors that occur. Notice that your stress level has decreased, feeling like it is not even there. Imagine a situation in which you would normally feel most angry or upset. . . . yet you feel calm and relaxed. Calm and relaxed. All negative thoughts have left you, and you feel only positive energy. Positive and peaceful energy. Calm and relaxed. Notice that you are able to handle situations in a calm and relaxed way. You feel like your spirit has been lifted and filled with positive energy and peaceful feelings. You are and have become more and more aware of your positive feelings and the energy that will stay with you. Take the next few moments to allow yourself to feel this warm, relaxed, calm, peaceful, positive energy flow throughout your body. In a few moments, I am going to count to five. Bringing you back to the room feeling relaxed, calm, peaceful, and patient. One, feeling calm and relaxed. Two, becoming more aware of your surroundings. Three, feeling more awake. Four, feeling vibrant and aware. Five, open your eyes and come back to the room feeling refreshed and renewed.
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
147
Appendix K Instrument Permission Letters-Stress Overload Scale
Dear Macy Waltz: Thank you for your interest in the Stress Overload Scale. I am the copyright holder as well as the author of the scale. I give you permission to use the SOS free of charge in your research, and to make as many copies you need for the participants in your studies. However, I do ask (1) that you use the instrument for non-profit purposes only, and (2) that you do not reprint the instrument in its entirety in your dissertation or any publications (including sample items is fine). I have had some problems with people using my scales for profit without my knowledge or consent. Best of luck with your dissertation project! Sincerely, James H. Amirkhan, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology California State University Long Beach james.amirkhan@csulb.edu
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
148
Appendix L Instrument Permission Letters-Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale 1 (short form)
Anita Woolfolk Hoy, Ph.D. Professor Psychological Studies in Education Dear Macy Waltz, You have my permission to use the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale in your research. A copy the scoring instructions can be found at: http://u.osu.edu/hoy.17/research/instruments/ Best wishes in your work,
Anita Woolfolk Hoy, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus College of Education Phone 614-292-3774 29 West Woodruff Avenue www.coe.ohio-state.edu/ahoy FAX 614-292-7900 Columbus, Ohio 43210-1177 Hoy.17@osu.edu
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
149
Appendix M Instrument Permission Letters-Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
150
Appendix N Reminder Emails and Flyers- Email Reminder for Experimental Group: Group A
Dear Student Teacher (Teacher Candidate in the later phase),
Thank you for volunteering to participate in my research study! I cannot thank you enough for volunteering your time to help me. You were assigned to Group A. Your instructions for the training are listed below. My name is Macy Waltz and I am a doctoral student in the Counselor Education and Supervision program at Texas Tech University. I am writing to provide more details about my research study and remind you about my project on stress management and self-care training. You're eligible to be in this study because you are 18 years or older and a student teacher/teacher candidate in the Tech Teach program at TTU. I obtained your contact information from your notecard during recruitment. Below you will see the time, date, and location of my study. By volunteering to participate in this study, you will partake in a wellness training on a specified date, time, and location. Remember, this is completely voluntary. You can choose to be in the study or not. If you'd like to participate or have any questions about the study, please email or contact me at macy.waltz@ttu.edu. We look forward to seeing you on:
Date: Specified Date Room #: Specified Room
Location: Specified Location Time: Specified Time!!!
Thank you very much! Sincerely,
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
151
Appendix O Reminder Emails and Flyers- Email Reminder for Control Group: Group B
Dear Student Teacher (Teacher Candidate in the later phase),
Thank you for volunteering to participate in my research study! I cannot thank you enough for volunteering your time to help me. You were assigned to Group A. Your instructions for the training are listed below. My name is Macy Waltz and I am a doctoral student in the Counselor Education and Supervision program at Texas Tech University. I am writing to provide more details about my research study and remind you about my project on stress management and self-care training. You're eligible to be in this study because you are 18 years or older and a student teacher/teacher candidate in the Tech Teach program at TTU. I obtained your contact information from your notecard during recruitment. Below you will see more instructions for what to do on a specified date. By volunteering to participate in this study, you will take a pretest and posttest on a specified date in a specified room and location. Please come to the specified room at the specified time for the pretest. You will be dismissed after completing the research packet. After class you will come back to the specified room at the specified time for the posttest. Both the pretest and posttest will take 15 minutes each to complete. You will be dismissed after completing the posttest. Remember, this is completely voluntary. You can choose to be in the study or not. If you'd like to participate or have any questions about the study, please email or contact me at macy.waltz@ttu.edu. We look forward to seeing you on:
Date: Specified Date Room #: Specified Room
Location: Specified Location Time: Specified Time!!!
Thank you very much! Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
152
Appendix P Reminder Emails and Flyers-Flyer Reminder for Research Project
Student Teachers/Teacher Candidates! This is a reminder about my research project that
is happening at a specified time on stress management and self-care in the College of
Education building at TTU! Group A- Please come to the specified room at the
specified time! Group B- Please come to the specified room at the
specified time!
Thank you and we will see you soon! (If you forget what group you were assigned check your email or Macy
Waltz will be in the lobby by the stairs with a list.)
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
153
Appendix Q Reminder Emails and Flyers-Email Reminder for Delayed Posttest
Dear Student Teacher (Teacher Candidate in the later phase),
Thank you for volunteering to participate in my research study! I cannot thank you enough for volunteering your time to help me. This is an email reminder about taking a delayed posttest for my research project. Your instructions for the delayed posttest are listed below. This posttest is completely voluntary. You will be asked to sign an informed consent again before filling out the research packet. The research pcket will take 15 minutes to complete and includes the same instruments and survey from the pretest and first posttest that was given to you on a specified date. By taking this delayed posttest you will be helping me add to the research on ways to help future teachers cope with stress. It will be greatly appreciated if you volunteer to take this posttest. It will help me understand how to help future student teachers and teachers! Please come to a specified room at a specified time for the delayed posttest. The Student Co-PI will draw one name for the $50 dollar Target gift card on specified date. The winner will receive an email on how to access their Target gift card. Remember, this is completely voluntary. You can choose to participate in the delayed posttest or not. If you'd like to participate or have any questions about the delayed posttest or research project, please email or contact me at macy.waltz@ttu.edu. We look forward to seeing you on:
Date: Specified Date Room #: Specified Room
Location: Specified Location Time: Specified Time
Thank you very much! Sincerely,
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
154
Appendix R Reminder Emails and Flyers-Flyer Reminder for Delayed Posttest
Student Teachers/Teacher Candidates! This is a reminder about the delayed posttest that
is happening today, a specified date, for my research project on stress management and self-
care in the College of Education at TTU! Please come to a specified at a specified time for
the delayed posttest. Thank you and we will see you soon!
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
155
Appendix S Reminder Emails and Flyers-Email Reminder for Control Group Spring 2016
Training
Dear Student Teacher (Teacher Candidate in the later phase),
Thank you for volunteering to participate in my research study! I cannot thank you enough for volunteering your time. This is an email reminder about an opportunity to participate in my stress management and self-care training. Your instructions for the training are listed below. This training is completely voluntary. You will be asked to participate in multiple activities throughout this 60-minute training. You will learn more information on stress management and ways to take care of yourself in a healthy manner. You will also learn new coping skills that can be applied to every day life situations. Please come to a specified room at a specified time for the training. Remember, this is completely voluntary. You can choose to participate in the training. If you'd like to participate or have any questions about the training or research project, please email or contact me at macy.waltz@ttu.edu. We look forward to seeing you on:
Date: Specified Date Room #: Specified Room
Location: Specified Location Time: Specified Time
Thank you very much! Sincerely,
Macy Waltz Janet Froeschle Hicks Student Co-PI Primary Investigator Texas Tech University Texas Tech University
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
156
Appendix T Pretest Box Plots
Figure 7: Stress Overload Scale (SOS) Total
Texas Tech University, Macy Waltz, May 2016
157
Figure 8: Personal Strain Questionnaire (PSQ) Mean
Figure 9: Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) Mean