Creating quality standards for scientific content in digital environments through the development...

transcript

DEVELOPMENT OF A UTILITY MODEL FOR CREATING QUALITY

STANDARDS IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ALGORITHMS FOR THE METRIC, SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC CONTENT

Almudena Mangas-Vega, Spain, University of Salamanca, almumvega@usal.es José Antonio Cordón García, University of Salamanca, jcordon@usal.esRaquel Gómez Díaz, University of Salamanca, rgomez@usal.es

TEEM’16

E-lectra: Grupo de Investigación sobre Edición Electrónica y Lecto-escritura Digital. Universidad de Salamanca (España). electra.usal.es

TEEM’16

Introduction

Scientific production

Qualifications Possibilities of

Teaching

Rankings of universities

Resources

Funding

Prestige

TEEM’16

E-lectra: Grupo de Investigación sobre Edición Electrónica y Lecto-escritura Digital. Universidad de Salamanca (España). electra.usal.esE-lectra: Grupo de Investigación sobre Edición Electrónica y Lecto-escritura Digital. Universidad de Salamanca (España). electra.usal.es

Introduction3

Scientific production

Qualifications Possibilities of

Teaching

Rankings of universities

Resources

Funding

Prestige

JournalsProceedings

Monographs

TEEM’16

4Introduction (II)

Electronic publishing Growth Facilitates the assessment

Lack of a system for quality assessment Systemized Easy to apply

TEEM’16

5Working hypothesis and principal objectives sought

• Quality guideline (KDP)

Amazon

• The Digital Book Awards

Digital Book World

• Book Citation Index

Thomson Reuters

• Book Titles Expansion

Elsevier

• DOI chapters of scientific monographs

CrossRef

• Scholarly Publishers Indicators in Humanities & Social Sciences

• UNESCO• E-LECTRA• UNE• REBIUN• FECYT• ANECAOthers

TEEM’16

6Working hypothesis and principal objectives sought (II)Objectives:

Quality indicators in the current tools current landscape

Automatized Indicators

Prototype

Review / study

Define

Design

TEEM’16

7Metodology

Literature review (monographs, journals and conference proceedings). Analysis of the current landscape of scientific publication Definition of a set of indicators for the assessment of scientific

monographs. Development of a prototype for automated analysis procedures and

assessment to apply them in different contexts. Study of the possibilities of inclusion of the prototype in any of the

current tools. Or design a new tool or an executable app

TEEM’16

8Metodology (II)

• Articles• Manuals• Standards• … Bibliographic

Review

• Publishers• Reposities• Libraries

Interviews with experts Bibliometric studies

Network analysisComparison of platforms

Current landscape (self-publishing,…)

Defining a framework to test the system of indicators defined

TEEM’16

9Results to date and discussion

A system of quality assessment for monographs (>30 indicators) A broader view of the world of publishing:

necessary to study of the surrounding scientific monographs before tackling the development of a model

variety of agents involved = various approaches & consensus self-publishing influence Little static environment = limit is necessary The time is now

TEEM’16

10Current and expected contributions

Tests results Automation of the indicators defined

Study the possibilities of implementation in current tools

Prototype design

UTILITY MODEL FOR CREATING QUALITY STANDARDS IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS

Thank You DEVELOPMENT OF A UTILITY MODEL FOR CREATING QUALITY

STANDARDS IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ALGORITHMS FOR THE METRIC, SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC CONTENT

Almudena Mangas-Vega, Spain, University of Salamanca, almumvega@usal.es José Antonio Cordón García, University of Salamanca, jcordon@usal.esRaquel Gómez Díaz, University of Salamanca, rgomez@usal.es

TEEM’16

Creating quality standards for scientific content in digital environments through the development...

Education