Post on 20-Feb-2022
transcript
© Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited 2013 Disclaimer:
This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC.
ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or
misrepresentation in this document.
This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s intranet or extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document.
CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
End Stage Report
18/12/14 3.0
Template Status
Discipline: Engineering Category: Procedure - Template Related Procedure: EGP-20-01 Project Management Template number: EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report Date Reviewed: 03 Sep 13 Version: 1.0
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 2 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
Contents
1 Purpose ................................................................................................. 4
2 Stage Objectives .................................................................................... 5
2.1 Product(s) Developed ........................................................................ 5
2.2 Time Performance (Milestones) ........................................................... 5
2.2.1 Incorrect Schedule Related Assumptions ..................................... 6
2.2.2 Common Schedule Factors ........................................................ 6
2.3 Costs Performance ............................................................................ 6
2.3.1 Incorrect Costing Assumptions .................................................. 6
2.3.2 Common Costing Factors .......................................................... 6
2.4 Quality Performance .......................................................................... 6
2.4.1 Incorrect Quality Assumptions ................................................... 7
2.4.2 Common Quality Factors .......................................................... 7
3 Approved Changes ................................................................................. 7
3.1 Statistics on Changes Received ........................................................... 7
3.2 Change Impact ................................................................................. 7
3.3 Statistics on Issues Received .............................................................. 8
3.4 Issues Impact................................................................................... 8
4 Lessons Learned .................................................................................... 8
5 Recommendations ................................................................................. 9
6 Appendix A .......................................................................................... 10
6.1 Stage 1 Coonamia to Stirling North Single Line Diagram ....................... 10
7 Appendix B .......................................................................................... 11
7.1 Stage 2 Spencer Junction to Tarcoola Single Line Diagram .................... 11
8 Appendix C .......................................................................................... 12
8.1 Financial Report .............................................................................. 12
9 Appendix D .......................................................................................... 13
9.1 Radio Link Configuration .................................................................. 13
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 3 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
Document Control
Client: Australian Rail Track Corporation
Project: CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola
Document Title: End Stage Report
Date Issued: 18/12/14
Revision: 2.0
Prepared by:
Purpose: To close out the CTC Project
Endorsed by:
Approved by: Budget Investment Committee
Date Approved: 18/12/14
Issued to: BIC
Revision History
Revision Date Issued To Description
1.0 26/11/14 Initial review
2.0 27/11/14 Operational and client review
3.0 18/12/14 BIC For Approval
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 4 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
1 Purpose Prior to this project Coonamia to Stirling North and Spencer Junction to Tarcoola were areas that operated on Manual Train Orders, a paper based system of safe working delivered via a voice radio handshake process between the Network Controller and the Train Driver or Track Worker.
Mineral traffic growth was driving the requirement for new train paths on the East West Corridor between Port Augusta and Tarcoola. This new demand was in addition to the growth experienced in intermodal traffic over recent years on this section. The IMX ore, and intermodal traffic growth and the Arrium Minerals (Western Plains) ore traffic had consumed the capacity available from the timetable in the corridor. Whilst this was positive for revenue it impacted on our ability to continue to deliver reliable operations with the existing system and hence would constrain our ability to grow the business.
Alternative means of delivering capacity had been evaluated and initially a restricted capability version of ATMS was chosen. Unfortunately the timeframe to deliver this form of ATMS was outside the required timeframe for a solution. As a result, to deliver extra capacity, simultaneously reduce pressure on network control; and improve safety, Centralised Traffic Control with mid-section or intermediate signals was installed from Coonamia to Stirling North and Spencer Junction to Tarcoola. The CTC Island at Port Augusta was interfaced to the two projects in order to provide a continuous CTC system from Adelaide to Tarcoola.
The original budget was fixed and the scope of works was amended to fit the budget which necessitated that intermediate signals at 8 locations between crossing loops could not be installed. This had the effect of reducing train capacity between Port Augusta and Tarcoola but this only had a minor impact given the overall improvement that CTC has provided as an outcome to the project.
The ability of the Infrastructure Services team in delivering the CTC system at 16 crossing loops and 12 intermediate locations between Coonamia and Tarcoola within a 17 month period is a testament to their professionalism, dedication and work ethics to get this significant project across the line.
The benefits of this project to our customers have been significant and have alleviated congestion on this section of the Interstate Network. The benefits include:
The existing headway of approximately 16 minutes between Dry Creek and Coonamia now extends to Spencer Junction from the previous 25 minute headway between Coonamia and Spencer Junction.
Flexibility of pathing enhanced between Port Germein and Spencer Junction.
Improved management of PN driver only operations.
Reduction in headway allocation between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola to approximately 20 minutes from the previous 25 minutes.
Flexibility in pathing between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola.
Security of the network by locking all sidings and network interface points requiring intervention by the Network Controller.
Visual notification of active level crossing operations.
The project was carried out in 2 stages, stage 1 was between Coonamia and Stirling North with an agreed budget of $2.6M, stage 2 was between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola with an agreed budget of $16.950M. Added to the overall budget was the expenditure incurred against the initial ATMS Voice Operating system ($500K) and the sunk costs for ATMS ($1.5M). Total budget for the project was $21,550,000.00.
The project received additional funds to cover the cost of increased scope of works under stage 2 and encountering sub surface rock at sites from Wirrappa to Tarcoola. A reasonable amount of money was allocated to the project under risk to cover encountering rock however unexpectedly a significant amount of sub surface rock was encountered that proved to be more extensive and harder than envisaged.
The decision to use the Telstra Next G network to control intermediate signal locations and the Coondambo crossing loop was taken early in the project as this was seen as the most cost
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 5 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
effective methodology to fit within the agreed budget. The issue of latency (time delay in milliseconds) causing drop out within the Next G network was discussed and evaluated with the decision to accept the risk and proceed with using the Telstra Next G Network. An identified risk mitigation was to incorporate time delays into the signal design to manage the latency of the Next G Network.
While the Next G Network is within specification for voice transmission it has since been proven that with data package transmission the incidence of drop out causing axle counter failure in a fail safe mode has increased, the axle counter failures; subject to confirmation of certain conditions; requires a reset from Network Control which is an encumbrance operationally.
A 5.8 GHz radio link was installed and tested at the intermediate signal location (Renton) between Kingoonya and Ferguson to determine the reliability of the link.
The testing of the radio link has been successful. The latency of the radio network is negligible and should significantly reduce the incidence of axle counter resets and a project has been set up and funded ($410,000) to install the radio link at all sites that are using the Next G Network to minimise the incidence of axle counter failure and Network Control intervention.
The project for installation of CTC between Coonamia and Tarcoola has been completed with the agreed scope of works delivered.
2 Stage Objectives
2.1 Product(s) Developed
Product Name Product Description Status
Stage 1 Installation of CTC between Coonamia and Stirling North
Complete
Stage 2 Installation of CTC between Spencer Junction and Tarcoola
Complete
2.2 Time Performance (Milestones) Tasks that were achieved within time estimates:
Stage 1, Coonamia to Port Augusta, commissioning of three crossing loops and intermediate locations were achieved.
Tasks delivered under time estimates:
Nil
Tasks that exceeded time estimates:
Long lead items - material delivery exceeded the supplier given timeframes.
The commissioning of Stage 2, (Port Augusta to Tarcoola) crossing Loops and intermediate locations exceeded the initial delivery timeframe by 12 months.
This was due to the following factors:-
o signal design changes and material procurement to accommodate additional starter signals, signal locations for starter signals, relocation of signal 54; extra point detection and roll out protection for goods sidings,
o relocation of Signal 54 at Spencer Junction to accommodate operational overlap requirements,
o extension of McLeay Goods Siding,
o weather (extreme heat),
o sub surface rock at nine crossing loop locations.
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 6 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
2.2.1 Incorrect Schedule Related Assumptions The schedule was implemented with the ‘best case’ scenario relating to staff, plant, contractors, weather and local conditions given an expected initial completion date of the 30th June 2013.
Contractors were engaged with the intention to reduce the project timeline. This assumption provided less timeframe reduction than envisaged.
Additional works to accommodate operational requirements (relocation of #54 signal at Spencer Junction and advance starter signals at all crossing loops with intermediate signal locations).
Discovery of significant areas of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops dramatically increased the construction time at each of those loops.
2.2.2 Common Schedule Factors Common schedule changes through the project were due to signalling scope and design changes as the project progressed and the discovery of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops all contributed to increase the overall project timeframe.
2.3 Costs Performance Costs that met or bettered agreed budgets:
Stage 1, $2.6M (Coonamia to Stirling North) was under budget by $175,669.00.
Costs that exceeded agreed budgets:
Stage 2, $16.950M (Port Augusta to Tarcoola) exceeded budget by $168,003.00.
2.3.1 Incorrect Costing Assumptions Stage 2 (Spencer Junction to Tarcoola) exceeded initial estimates due to:
Site construction work at nine crossing loops was significantly more than anticipated due to the extent and hardness of sub surface rock.
The number of axle counters was more than the initial concept signal design as it did not cover all scenarios for operational requirements.
Additional works to meet operational requirements, relocation of #54 signal at Spencer Junction to provide safety overlap and advance starter signals at all crossing loops with intermediate signal locations. Starter signals were required to comply with Network Operating Rules.
Extension of the McLeay Goods Loop, this was requested by the East West corridor to provide a ballast loading location north of Port Augusta.
2.3.2 Common Costing Factors A common costing factor for this project was the discovery of sub surface rock at nine crossing loops.
2.4 Quality Performance Outputs that met or exceeded quality requirements:
The processes to ensure quality outcomes of the train management system as detailed in ARTC standard ESC-21-02 Inspection and Testing of Signalling, Plans, Programs, Documentation and Packages met the Project Management Plan (PMP) objectives. Signalling Inspection and Test Plans along with Installation and Commissioning Work Plans were also produced to meet the quality requirements of the project.
Outputs that failed to meet quality requirements:
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 7 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
The Telstra Next G network did not meet the reliability requirements expected of the system due to latency issues with the network. The latency in the network caused ‘drop outs’ which affected the reliability of the CTC train management system. While the Next G Network is within specification for voice transmission it has since been proven that with data package transmission the incidence of drop out causing axle counter failure in a fail safe mode has increased.
2.4.1 Incorrect Quality Assumptions The Telstra Next G Network did not perform as expected with data package transmissions even though time delays were built into the signal design to compensate for the latency.
2.4.2 Common Quality Factors A common quality factor was the Telstra Next G Network.
3 Approved Changes
3.1 Statistics on Changes Received Approved Changes:
Signalling Design
o Increase in the number of Axle Counters from original estimate
o Relocation of signal 54 at Spencer junction to meet the overlap requirements for the Spencer Junction to Tent Hill block section.
o Advance Starter signals at crossing loops with intermediate signal locations to comply with Network Operating Rules.
o Goods siding extended at McLeay Crossing Loop
Scope
o Advance starter signals at crossing loops with intermediate locations
o Extension of the McLeay Crossing Loop goods siding
o Reduction in the number of intermediate locations
Timeframe
o Material delivery delays
o Project commissioning delays
o Sub surface rock at nine crossing loops
o Additional signal installations
Cost
o Sub surface rock increased construction costs of plant, labour and ancillary costs.
o Project delivery timeframe impacted the overall cost.
3.2 Change Impact Scope change extended the delivery timeframe and cost. (NcOP) (Starter Signals)
Scope change meant signal design changes that extended the delivery timeframe
Cost increase due to nine locations having sub surface rock. ($1,920,630.00)
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 8 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
3.3 Statistics on Issues Received Twenty issues were identified by the Project Manager for the project and were recorded in the CTC Project Issues register.
The majority of issues were concerned with scope changes and request for information from the Signalling Contractor.
All identified Project issues were closed out.
3.4 Issues Impact Stage 1 – Coonamia to Port Augusta
Material delivery delays – Delayed site work such that construction staff had to relocate to other loops while waiting for materials to arrive.
Rail Insulation – Delays to the installation of insulated spacers due to frozen rail clips.
Stage 2- Port Augusta to Tarcoola
Material Delivery Delays – Delayed site work such that construction staff had to relocate to other loops while waiting for materials to arrive.
Signal Configuration Change – the requirement for a 300 metre safety overlap between # 53 and #54 signals at Spencer Junction to allow shunting operations to continue while a train is travelling from Tent Hill to Spencer Junction.
Signal Configuration Change- the requirement for Advance Starter Signals to be installed at crossing loops for line sections that had Intermediate Signals.
Signalling Contractor – delays for the delivery of designs for construction works, communication and design principle issues.
Sub Surface Rock – Affected trenching at nine crossing loops – significant impact on cost and delivery timeframe (The extent and hardness of the rock was not anticipated at the time of original scope and cost estimate).
4 Lessons Learned
Project Area Lesson Learned Required Action
Project Process Improve the transition from a concept proposal to allow for a detailed scope and cost to be produced prior to project initiation and budget approval.
Follow EGP 20-01.
Project Process Review the project proposal against the Operational Specification for compliance with the train safe working system applicable to the location of the project.
Review prior to project commitment.
Project Process Use of a common estimating tool (database v spreadsheet) to improve project estimating.
Investigate.
Signalling Design Ensure the contracted signal design organisation agree to and comply with the ARTC directives relating to signal design principles for the required project.
Review prior to contract engagement.
Technical Processes Provision of dedicated safe worker/s for all commissioning’s.
Actioned
Contract Management Scope of works to be clear and concise as possible with no anomalies and responsibilities and accountabilities defined.
Review scope of works prior to contract engagement.
Quality Management Interface works between Signalling Infrastructure and Track and Civil Infrastructure required better coordination.
Review prior to project commencement.
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 9 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
5 Recommendations That the Budget Investment Committee approves this End of Stage Report and the CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola is closed out.
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 10 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
6 Appendix A
6.1 Stage 1 Coonamia to Stirling North Single Line Diagram
Rev Date Revision Description
Sheet No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
B
C
D
E
F
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
B
C
D
E
F
AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION LTD
Designed
Checked Ind. Rev.
Approv.
© [2010] Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd.
Scale:
NA
Used on / Next higher assembly:
Alternate DMS number:
Filename:
ASSEMBLY
ARTCW3090128.DWG
Drawing standard in accordance with PP-117.4.3
TO
S
TIR
LIN
G N
OR
TH
ARTCW3090128
1 of 1
ARTC APPROVAL
Designing By:
Drawn
Checked
Review
Signature
Ind.Rev. Company Ind.Rev. Name
Approved By
Approval Date
Signed:
R.G.
T.O.
ARTC (SC)
SIRI HATTOTUWA
03/02/2010
TO
T
EN
T H
IL
L
PT. AUGUSTA PASSENGER LOOP
SALT LAKE
OV
ER
PA
SS
HIG
HW
AY
89.968km
ST
IR
LIN
G
90.266km
RD
HO
SP
IT
AL
90.767km
RD
CA
RLT
ON
91.580km
PA
RA
DE
91.561km
23
17
27
MAINLINE
CROSSING LOOP (1108m)
24
24
E
A
18
18
A
19
19
91.647km
91.692km
91.882km
92.100km
OV
ER
PA
SS
FLIN
DE
RS
T
CE
92.149km
OV
ER
PA
SS
JE
RV
OIS
S
T
92.360km
OV
ER
PA
SS
HIG
HW
AY
92.410km
33
33
E
92.742km
92.823km
92.867km
ST
TA
SS
IE
28
A
37
29
MAINLINE
29
93.020km
92.940km
34
34
34
H
E
93.135km
(DWARF)
43
43
E
38
38
40
A
46
95km
41
95.086km
95.145km
95.170km
39
39
A
95.228km95.294km
44
42
95.320km
52
51
96
54
53
98
9
5
.
8
3
7
k
m
9
7
.
9
8
0
k
m
9
5
.
7
2
0
k
m
9
7
.
8
2
0
k
m
TO
W
HY
ALL
A
PT. AUGUSTA CROSSING LOOP
SPENCER JUNCTION
YARD
B
R
I
D
G
E
CROSSING LOOP (1865m)
ARTC MAINLINE
PICHI RICHI MAINLINE
TO
C
OO
NA
MIA
TO
P
T A
UG
US
TA
PT. GERMEIN
7
A
16
20
MAINLINE
GOODS SIDING
CROSSING LOOP (1906m)
3
16
26.900km
24.738km
13.41km
24.84km
26.841km
25.06km
MAMBRAY CREEK
29.394km
23.918km
SO
UT
HE
RN
A
CC
ES
S
PT
G
ER
ME
IN
OV
ER
PA
SS
HIG
HW
AY
1
OLD
81.915km
RD
WILM
IN
GT
ON
83.082km
RD
QU
OR
N
83.058km
84.705km
TC
E
NO
RT
H
3
84.687km
85.360km
13
8
9
8
13
E
A
TO WILKATANA
TO
P
OW
ER
S
TA
TIO
N
HA
RR
IS
85.526km
ST
FO
OT
NE
R
87.150km
RD
14E
14
85.850km
88.495km
STIRLING NORTH
88
89
ARTC MAINLINE
PICHI RICHI MAINLINE
A
9
(A1_SHEET)
14
13
21
22.531km
4
4
E
24.74km
26.746km
23
23
E
26.901km
24
30
34.7km
34
33
720
MAINLINE
CROSSING LOOP (1821m)
3
43.927km
44.02km
45.938km
47.550km
41
42.300km
4
4
E
43.929km
23
23
E
45.954km
24
48
45.841km
60.1km
60
59
7
20
MAINLINE
CROSSING LOOP (1844m)
3
70.446km
70.534km
72.473km
74.976km
68.919km
RD
MA
IN
N
OR
TH
67
68.022km
4
4
E
70.448km
72.378km
23
23
E
72.476km
24
74
WINNINOWIE
83
TO
S
TIR
LIN
G N
OR
TH
TO
W
IN
NIN
OW
IE
A 29/7/13 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta (I.S. 19/6/13)
T.O. M.F. S.H. D.B.
A
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 11 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
7 Appendix B
7.1 Stage 2 Spencer Junction to Tarcoola Single Line Diagram
ARTC APPROVAL
Sheet No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
B
C
D
E
F
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
B
C
D
E
F
SJC-S0043
AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION LTD
© [2014] Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd.
Scale:
NA
Used on / Next higher assembly:
Alternate DMS number:Filename:
SJC-S0043.DWG
Designed
Checked
Review
Signature
Ind.Rev. Company Ind.Rev. Name
Approved By
Approval Date
Signed:
SPENCER JUNCTION TO TARCOOLA
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
Rev Date Revision Description
Designed
Checked Ind. Rev.
Approv.
Drawing standard in accordance with EGP-04-01 & EGP-04-02
ARTC
MAINLINE
120.622km118.644km
TENTHILL
CROSSING LOOP (1845m)
MAINLINE
274.609km
PIMBA
CROSSING LOOP (1846m)
272.464km
WO
OM
ER
AR
D
148.910km
ST
UA
RT
HW
Y
115.860km
MAINLINE
311.983km
309.791km
BURANDO
CROSSING LOOP (2046m)
118.428km
118.728km
7
120.573km120.880km
123.439km
20
MAINLINE
HESSO
CROSSING LOOP (1841m)
143
3
7
4E
150.006km
20
MAINLINE
BOOKALOO
CROSSING LOOP (1838m)
172.600km
173
3
7
23
23E
24
182
20
MAINLINE
211.147km
209.060km
McLEAY
CROSSING LOOP (1932m)
206.347km
207
209.126km
3
7
4
4E
211.069km
211.368km
23
23E
24
214.018km
214
20
208.829km
MAINLINE
242.900km
240.918km
WIRRAPPA
CROSSING LOOP (1850m)
238.050km
237
240.687km
240.990km
3
7
242.829km
243.200km
23
23E
24
245.765km
246
20
269.780km
267
272.280km
272.692km
13
14
14E
274.538km274.838km
23
23E
24
277.338km
278
20
306.995km
307
309.860km
13
7
14
14E
309.558km
311.915km
312.215km
23
23E
24
314.696km
314
20
MAINLINE
343.001km
341.018km
WIRRAMINNA
CROSSING LOOP (1835m)
337.995km
337
340.816km
341.121km
13
7
14
14E
342.955km343.252km
23
23E
24
345.712km
344
20
MAINLINE
366.541km
364.500km
COONDAMBO
CROSSING LOOP (1845m)
361.778km
361
364.596km
3
7
4
4E
364.296km
366.451km
366.751km
24
369.269km
370
20
MAINLINE
394.671km
392.703km
KULTANABY
CROSSING LOOP (1820m)
389.800km
391
392.501km
392.801km
3
7
4
4E
394.573km394.873km
23
23E
24
397.570km
396
20
MAINLINE
426.860km
424.870km
KINGOONYA
CROSSING LOOP (1822m)
422.020km
423
424.640km
424.940km
3
7
4
4E
426.762km427.062km
23
23E
24
430.312km
430
20
MAINLINE
469.690km
467.634km
FERGUSON
CROSSING LOOP (1904m)
464.774km
465
467.713km
13
7
14
14E
467.457km
469.617km
469.917km
24
472.391km
472
20
SPENCER JUNCTION
TO
M
cLE
AY
TO
B
OO
KA
LO
O
TO
B
UR
AN
DO
TO
P
IM
BA
TO
K
ULT
AN
AB
Y
TO
C
OO
ND
AM
BO
TO
T
AR
CO
OLA
374.968km
ST
UA
RT
HW
Y
OV
ER
BR
ID
GE
23E
23
23
23E
255.350km
255
256
283.650km
283
284
295
296
326.000km
325
326
448.150km
447
448
97.820km
447.850km
325.700km
255.050km 283.350km
296.900km
296.600km
MASON CREEK
PALPINNA
RENTON
7
Q1
Q4 Q6
Q7
Q8Q9
Q10 Q11 Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16 Q17
Q18 Q19 Q20
Q21
Q22
Q24
Q23
Q25
Q26
Q28Q27
Q29Q30
Q31
Q32 Q33
Q34
Q35
Q36
Q38 Q40
Q39 Q41 Q42
Q43 Q44 Q45
Q47
Q48
Q49
Q51
Q50
Q52 Q53
Q54
Q55
Q56 Q57Q58
Q60
Q61
Q62
Q63
Q64
Q66
Q68
Q69Q70
Q71
4
33
Q72
Q73
Q74 Q75
4
Q76
Q77
Q78
Q80Q82
Q81 Q83
33
Q84
Q85
Q86
Q87 Q88 Q89
Q90
Q91
Q92
Q93
Q94
Q95
Q96 Q974
Q100 Q101
Q102
Q103 Q104
Q105
Q106
Q108
Q107 Q109 Q110
Q111 Q112 Q113
Q114
Q115
Q116
Q117
Q118
Q119
Q120Q121
Q124 Q125 Q126
Q127
Q128
Q129
Q130
Q132
Q131
Q133 Q134
33
Q135
Q136
Q137Q138
Q1394
Q140 Q141
Q142 Q144
Q145
Q146Q148
Q147Q149 Q150
33
18
A
18
2021
A
21
TARCOOLA
TO KALGOORLIE
CROSSING LOOP (1850m)
CAR MAINLINE
TAR MAINLINE
TO ALICE SPRINGS
503.379km
501
487.050km
487.350km
500.61km
13
503.110km
9
7
14E
503.472km
14
14H
503.420km
508.5km
508
506
34
24
505.624km
505.506km
23E
23
TO
F
ER
GU
SO
N
5
1
0
.
8
5
0
k
m
NORTHGATE BLOCK POINT
487
488
WILGENA
4
33
503.868km 504.229km
504.360km
505.44km
505.435km
505.39km
505.312km
505.310km
503.327km
11
12
15
Q151
Q152
Q153 Q154
Q156
Q155
Q157
Q158
Q159 Q161
Q160
Q162
Q163
Q164Q165
Q166
Q168
Q167
Q169
Q171
Q172
Q173
Q174
177.704km
177.63km
177.93km
180.43km
272.703km
272.631km
175.720km
175.508km
175.808km
176.465km
147.031km145.056km142.330km
144.823km
145.124km
146.965km147.269km
33
EUCOLO
LAKE HART
Q175 Q170
54
53
95.720km
END CTC
START TOW
END TOW
START CTC
END GW
TOW
273.122km
210.206km
210.928km
242.646km
311.083km
342.650km
393.495km
426.55km
468.072km
468.582km
START GW
TOW
Q65
Q67
1211
12
11
12
12
11
11
12
12
11
12
11
98
Q2 Q3
117
3
4
4E 23E
23
24
124
4
23E
23
24
150
4E
4
Q5
4
4E
Q46
Q79
Q143
Q37
Q
1
7
6
Q177
511.0km
364.826km
176.521km
272.758km
273.070km
210.240km
210.931km
242.780km
311.043km
311.086km
342.638km
342.688km
468.135km
468.524km
503.910km
504.186km
505.322km
96.020km
04/08/14
05/08/14
05/08/14
T.OH
504.441km
M.FORBES
ARTCS.HATTUTOWA
05/08/14
ORIGINAL_SIGNED
D.BUTTON
ORIGINAL_SIGNED
11
A
11
A
12
A
12
A
11
A
12
A
12
A
11
A
11
A
12
A
12
A
11
A
12
A
11
A
12
A
15
A
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 12 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
8 Appendix C
8.1 Financial Report
1
2012 - 2013 Financial Year
ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR YTD ACT/FOR BUD VAR
MAJOR WORKS
860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta 258,879 - (258,879) 337,607 311,230 (26,377) 705,907 788,000 82,093 591,259 700,000 108,741 222,507 100,000 (122,507) 245,272 160,000 (85,272) 2,361,430 2,361,430 2,600,000 238,570
860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 606,642 - (606,642) 330,611 586,500 255,889 595,477 906,663 311,186 1,700,128 750,000 (950,128) 1,463,607 500,000 (963,607) 947,452 500,000 (447,452) 5,643,917 5,643,917 14,200,000 8,556,083
860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - 80,000 80,000 40,971 40,000 (971) 35,000 40,000 5,000 45,000 40,000 (5,000) 43,779 40,000 (3,779) 42,245 40,000 (2,245) 206,995 206,995 500,000 293,005
TOTAL: 865,521 80,000 (785,521) 709,189 937,730 228,541 1,336,384 1,734,663 398,279 2,336,386 1,490,000 (846,386) 1,729,893 640,000 (1,089,893) 1,234,969 700,000 (534,969) 8,212,342 8,212,342 17,300,000 9,087,658
Actual / Forecast Variance %
Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 8% 10% 16% 123% 53% Port Augusta to Tarcoola 0% 44% 34% 127% 193% 89%
Voice ATMS Operating 100% 2% 13% 13% 9% 6%
2013 - 2014 Financial Year
ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR
MAJOR WORKS
860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta 12,823 - (12,823) 6,266 - (6,266) - - - 43,812 - (43,812) - - - - - -
860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 1,351,004 780,681 (570,323) 1,390,095 1,300,000 (90,095) 1,525,241 1,350,000 (175,241) 1,542,034 1,300,000 (242,034) 1,030,645 1,200,000 169,355 917,670 884,339 (33,331)
860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating 82,175 50,000 (32,175) 41,618 50,000 8,382 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,000 40,000 48,859 8,859
TOTAL: 1,446,001 830,681 (615,320) 1,437,980 1,350,000 (87,980) 1,565,241 1,400,000 (165,241) 1,625,846 1,350,000 (275,846) 1,070,645 1,250,000 179,355 957,670 933,198 (24,472)
Actual / Forecast Variance %
Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Port Augusta to Tarcoola 73% 7% 13% 19% 14% 4%
Voice ATMS Operating 64% 17% 20% 20% 20% 18%
ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR PROJ TD ACT/FOR BUD VAR
MAJOR WORKS
860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,424,331 2,424,331 2,600,000 175,669
860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 1,344,640 398,788 (945,852) 807,222 433,991 (373,231) 440,131 200,000 (240,131) 351,824 350,000 (1,824) 472,017 357,401 (114,616) 287,347 220,000 (67,347) 17,103,787 17,103,787 16,950,000 (153,787)
860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 490,788 490,788 500,000 9,212
ATMS Sunk Costs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,490,589 1,500,000 9,411
TOTAL: 1,344,640 398,788 (945,852) 807,222 433,991 (373,231) 440,131 200,000 (240,131) 351,824 350,000 (1,824) 472,017 357,401 (114,616) 287,347 220,000 (67,347) 20,018,906 21,509,494 21,550,000 40,506
Actual / Forecast Variance %
Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Port Augusta to Tarcoola 237% 86% 120% 1% 32% 31%
Voice ATMS Operating 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
2014 - 2015 Financial Year
ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR ACT FOR VAR PROJ TD ACT/FOR BUD VAR
MAJOR WORKS
860901 772 CTC Installation - Coonamia to Pt Augusta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,424,331 2,424,331 2,600,000 175,669
860902 772 CTC Installation - Spencer Jct to Tarcoola 14,216 50,000 35,784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17,118,003 17,118,003 16,950,000 (168,003)
860900 995 Voice ATMS Operating - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 490,788 490,788 500,000 9,212
ATMS Sunk Costs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,490,589 1,500,000 9,411
TOTAL: 14,216 50,000 35,784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20,033,122 21,523,710 21,550,000 26,290
Actual / Forecast Variance %
Coonamia to Port Augusta 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Port Augusta to Tarcoola 72% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Voice ATMS Operating 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Infrastructure Services - CTC Project - Coonamia to Tarcoola31st July 2014
APR-13 MAY-13 JUN-13 12/13 TOTAL
JOB No.
ACT DESCRIPTIONJUL-13 AUG-13 SEP-13
JOB No.
ACT DESCRIPTIONJAN-13 FEB-13 MAR-13
JOB No.
ACT DESCRIPTIONJAN-14 FEB-14
SEP-14 OCT-14
OCT-13 NOV-13 DEC-13
MAR-14 APR-14
JOB No.
ACT DESCRIPTIONJUL-14 AUG-14 NOV-14 DEC-14 PROJECT TOTAL
MAY-14 Jun-14 PROJECT TOTAL
End Stage Report 18/12/14 3.0 CTC Project Coonamia to Tarcoola>
Engineering Procedure - Template Page 13 of 13 EGW2001T-16 End Stage Report EGP-20-01 Project Management Date of last revision: 03 Sep 13 This document is uncontrolled when printed. See ARTC Intranet for latest version. Version 1.0
9 Appendix D
9.1 Radio Link Configuration
LAN
Other Devices being Monitored
LAN
Distant Signal Location (Site A)
Microlok
RS232/422LAN
RS90
0 Sw
itch EDW-100
I/O Link
FAdC via Fibre and Nokia System
Site A
FAdC
RS900 Switch
Site B
Nokia System Nokia System
RS900 Switch
Ethernet over 2 Mb Trib of 34 Mb PDH System
LAN
LAN
LAN
Sing
le M
ode
Fibr
e
LAN
Other Devices being Monitored
LAN
Distant Signal Location (Site B)
Microlok
RS232/422LAN
RS90
0 Sw
itch EDW-100
I/O Link
FAdC
Single Mode Fibre
TITLE:Sheet 6 of 10
20/ REV DESCRIPTION DESIGN CHECK APPRDATE
PROJECT:
Vital Axle Counter Communication Link
Spencer Juntion to Tarcoola CTC
20/1/13 Draft PH
Serial Server
Microlok
Pimba Distant West
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
LAN
LAN
Eucolo
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
Next GVPN Client
LAN
LAN
Phoenix Serial
LAN
Lake Hart
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
Next GVPN Server
LAN
LAN
Microlok
Burando Distant East
Switch
Solar Reg
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
LAN
LAN
Telstra Network
NextG Network
Pt Augusta
Telstra Network
BDSL
Railway Communications Network - E1
Fibre Optic CableFibre Optic
Cable
Microlok Microlok
A/D Monitor
LAN LAN
IPsec VPN IPsec VPN IPsec VPN
Serial Server
Microlok
Pimba Distant West
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
LAN
LAN
Eucolo
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
Next GVPN Client
LAN
LAN
Phoenix Serial
LAN
Lake Hart
Switch
Solar Reg
A/D Monitor
LAN
FAdC
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
Next GVPN Server
LAN
LAN
Microlok
Burando Distant East
Switch
Solar Reg
LAN
FAdC
Serial Server
LAN
LAN
Diag Serial
LAN
LAN
Railway Communications Network - E1
Fibre Optic Cable
Fibre Optic Cable
Microlok Microlok
A/D Monitor
LAN LAN
AES 128
Pimba Comms HutBurando Comms Hut
AES 128AES 128
860900 ARTC Overheads 500860901 CTC Coonamia Pt Augusta 2500860902 CTC Spc Jct - Tar 15750860905 Contingency 1300860903 ATMS Authority 1000860904 ATMS Authority Sunk Costs 500860905860906860907
BIC SubmissionAugust September October November December January ebruar
860901 CTC Coonamia Pt Augusta 12,858 171 37 250 350860902 CTC Spc Jct - Tar 2,600 42 400 400
Total 20,000 64 105 100 204 -110 866 938
-$500
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$ '0
00
CTC Coonamia to Tarcoola Project Phasing
BIC Submission
Varied Budget
Actuals
Varied budget tracks BIC submission until Jan 2014
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$'00
0
CTC Coonamia to Tarcoola Cumulative Project
BIC Submission
Varied Budget
Actuals
Varied budget tracks BIC submission until Jan 2014