Delivering Safety and Health Training During the COVID-19 ......Delivering Safety and Health...

Post on 28-Feb-2021

3 views 0 download

transcript

Delivering Safety and Health Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sue Ann Corell Sarpy, Ph.D.

Sarpy and Associates, LLC

RAPID TRANSITION TO DISTANCE

LEARNING

March 2020 COVID-19 was Declared a Pandemic

Immediate Need for Worker Training on COVID-19

Designing and Delivering Training in REAL TIME

Transition to Health and Safety Training using Distance Learning

Evaluating Effectiveness of Worker Health and Safety Training

• Comparisons of Face-to-face versus Distance Learning Format on Training Outcomes

• Effectiveness of Health and Safety Training Designed During Pandemic to Meet Emerging Safety Needs

• Best Practices/Lessons Learned

• Tips and Tools for Trainers

• Next Steps for Distance Learning in Health and Safety Training

Courses Selected for Comparisons

CPWR Infection Control Risk

Assessment (ICRA) Trainings

Provided Face-to-Face Pre-Pandemic

Modified to Distance during

Pandemic

Instructional Team (same for both

formats)

Dates: April 2016 to July 2020

Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) Awareness Courses

• ICRA Awareness course prepares workers to perform construction, renovation, maintenance and demolition activities in healthcare facilities

• Involves active learner participation: case studies, lectures with discussion, demonstrations and hands-on activities to engage learners

• Pre-pandemic: 8-hour (Face-to-face)

• During pandemic: Revised to 6-hour that includes 1-hour COVID-19 and the Construction Industry Awareness Training (On-line)

Face-to-Face vs Distance Learning for Health and Safety Training

Study 1

Evaluation of ICRA Awareness Courses

CPWR Training Course Evaluation (26 items)

Immediately following training

Effectiveness• Instructor(s) • Teaching Methods/Materials• Overall

Learning• Training-related Knowledge/Skills

Comparisons of • ICRA Awareness 8-hr (Face-to-Face)• ICRA/COVID-19 Awareness 6-hour

(Distance)

Were There Differences in Effectiveness and Learning?

Face-to-Face ICRA (8hr) with Distance ICRA-COVID-19 (6hr)

4.804.65 4.76 4.724.71

4.434.64 4.62

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Instructor* Method** Overall* Learning

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Face-to-Face Distance

Face-to-Face ICRA Awareness (8-hr) with Distance ICRA/COVID-19 Awareness (6-hr)

Face-to-Face reported significantly higher ratings of EFFECTIVENESS:

• Instructors

• Teaching Methods and Materials

• Overall

• BUT no significant differences in LEARNING (Knowledge/Skills)

Effectiveness of Distance Learning for Occupational Health and Safety Training

Study 2

Effectiveness of Occupational Health and Safety Training Delivered During the Pandemic

• Designing and Delivered in Real Time to meet Worker Needs

• Trainings:

• COVID-19 and the Construction Industry Awareness Training (1-hour)

• ICRA/COVID-19 and the Construction Industry Awareness Training (6-hour)

• Delivery: Distance (Synchronous, On-line Format)

• Participants:

• Trainees (Members, Trainers, Union Representatives)

• CPWR Instructors

• Evaluation: On-line, September 2020

CPWR Distance Learning

Evaluation

Effectiveness (CPWR Instructors, Trainees)• Instructor•Content• Format

Learning/Performance (Trainees)• Learning (CPWR Training-

related Knowledge/Skills)•Performance on-the-job• Support on-the-job

Training Background Information

Training Attended

56%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

COVID-19 ICRA/COVID-19

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Date Attended Training

36%

27%

37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

March to April May to June July to August

Per

cen

tage

Trainee Background Information

Demographic Information

Race/Ethnicity Gender

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

White

Black/African American

Hispanic/Latino

Middle Eastern

Multiracial

Other

Prefer Not to Answer

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Male Female Prefer Not toAnswer

Work-Related CharacteristicsUnion Membership

24%

50%

26%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Member Trainer UnionRepresentative

Perc

ente

age

Professional Tenure

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Pre-Apprentice Apprentice Journeyworker

Perc

enta

ge

Painters and Allied Trades

38%

Electrical Workers3%

Elevator Constructors25%

Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied

Workers1%

Operative Plasterers’ and Cement Masons

15%

Plumbers, Fitters, Welders and Service Techs

11%

Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers

5%

Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers

2%

Training Effectiveness

Ratings of Training Effectiveness

6.49 6.65 6.33 6.435.89 5.78 5.67 5.671.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Content Instructor Format Overall

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Trainees CPWR Instructors

Learning Outcomes

Participants’ Learning

6.55 6.59 6.60 6.58 6.54 6.69 6.31 6.65

KSA1 KSA2 KSA3 KSA4 KSA5 KSA6 KSA7 KSA8

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Training-related Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities

Safety at the Workplace

Impact on Working Safety

6.32 6.17 6.34 6.44

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Prepared to worksafely

Used on the job Supervisory Support OrganizationalSupport

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Trainers Prepared to Train Using Distance Learning

23%

51%

20%

6%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Very Prepared Prepared SomewhatPrepared

A Little Prepared

Perc

enta

ge

Did the Participants’ Work Expertise Affect the Training Outcomes?

Did Participants’ Work Expertise Affect Outcomes?

Union Membership

• Member, Trainer, Union Representative

• NO significant differences on Effectiveness Ratings and Learning/Performance

Trade Affiliation

• Eight Trades Represented

• NO significant differences on Effectiveness Ratings and Learning/Performance

Did Training Length or Date Affect the Outcomes?

Did Training Characteristics Affect Outcomes?

Type/Length of Training

• Compared COVID-19 (1-hr) with ICRA/COVID-19 (6-hr)

• NO significant differences on Effectiveness Ratings and Learning/Performance

Month Training Presented

• Compared Months Presented (March/April, May/June, July/August)

• NO significant differences on Effectiveness Ratings and Learning/Performance

Did Participant’s Technological

Competence Affect the Outcomes?

Skill in Using Distance Learning Format

25%

39% 35%

1%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Very Skilled Skilled Somewhat Skilled Minimally Skilled

Perc

enta

ge

Effect of Trainee Skill in Using the

Technology on Training Outcomes

Instructor Effectiveness: Very Skilled and Skilled HIGHER ratings than Somewhat Skilled

Learning and Overall Effectiveness: Very Skilled HIGHER ratings than Somewhat Skilled

InstructorEffectiveness*

OverallEffectiveness*

Learning*

Somewhat Skilled 6.41 6.23 6.41

Skilled 6.40 6.48 6.56

Very Skilled 6.84 6.79 6.80

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Somewhat Skilled Skilled Very Skilled

Comfortable Taking Distance Learning

64%

24%

9%3%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Very Comfortable Comfortable SomewhatComfortable

SomewhatUncomfortable

Perc

enta

ge

Effect of Level of Trainee Comfort with

the Technology on Training Outcomes

Instructor, Content, and Format Effectiveness: Very Comfortable and Comfortable HIGHER ratings than Somewhat Comfortable

Learning, Performance on the job: Very Comfortable HIGHER ratings than Somewhat Comfortable

InstructorEffectiveness**

ContentEffectiveness**

FormatEffectiveness**

OverallInstructor

Effectiveness*

Overall FormatEffectiveness*

Learning** Performance** Support*

Somewhat Comfortable 5.44 5.56 5.24 6.00 5.89 6.25 5.33 5.78

Comfortable 6.35 6.49 6.00 6.67 6.00 6.40 5.97 6.14

Very Comfortable 6.67 6.64 6.35 6.71 6.52 6.68 6.50 6.64

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

Ave

rage

Rat

ing

Why did these results occur?

Comments from Trainees and CPWR Instructors

Instructor expertiseUse of synchronous on-line platform (Zoom)Content/Application to the workplaceInteraction/discussions/breakouts/pollsShift to distance learning (Safety/Flexibility)Use of distance learning (flexibility/safety)

MOST Valuable

Face-to-face more effective (Gold Standard)Limited interactionChallenges in using hands-onTechnical issuesLimited ability to read non-verbal cues

LEAST Valuable

Tools and Tips for Trainers

Before TrainingKnow the audience in advance of the session to gain information about learner (technological proficiency; accessibility) and workplace needs (occupational; trade)

Provide orientation training for participants and trainers that clarifies technology, course expectations, and resources prior to the training session

Provide access to all course-related information to participants in advance of the training session

Convene instructor planning and coordinating meetings with the other instructors to review roles and responsibilities

Rehearse presentations using the technology (including camera) preferably with performance feedback

During TrainingEncourage trainee engagement using specific regular interaction/discussions and diverse methods

Use co-instructor(s) to assist with technology

Create an open and flexible learning environment

Following TrainingEvaluate training to ensure continuous quality improvement

Provide up-to-date, relevant, on-line resources for participants and trainers

Before Training

➢ Know the audience in advance of the session to gain information about learner (technological proficiency; accessibility) and workplace needs (occupational; trade)

➢ Provide orientation training for participants and trainers that clarifies technology, course expectations, and resources prior to the training session

➢ Provide access to all course-related information to participants in advance of the training session

➢ Convene instructor planning and coordinating meetings with the other instructors to review roles and responsibilities

➢ Rehearse presentations using the technology (including camera) preferably with performance feedback

On-line Etiquette for

Trainees

Download training information ahead of time, including all handouts and PPTs.

Complete all pre-training assignments and assessments.

Test your computer compatibility with the platform. Log-in to the session at least 5 -10 minutes ahead of time.

Present a professional on-line presence (attire, background).

Limit distractions and do not multitask during training (turn off other devices).

Mute your microphone when not speaking.

Leave video/camera on at all times during class (do not revert to blank screen).

Share comments and questions in text chat and raise hand to ask questions.

During Training

➢ Encourage trainee engagement using specific regular interaction/discussions and diverse methods

➢ Use co-instructor(s) to assist with technology

➢ Create an open and flexible learning environment

Best Practices for Using Breakout Rooms

Provide clear instructions and a general framework for the breakout activity

Include a mix of participants to leverage expertise and experiences

Prepare trainees for breakout room expectations before you send them into their sessions

Depending on the activity, assign a facilitator for each room

Indicate the expected duration of the breakouts

Provide a way for trainees to get assistance, if needed, during the breakouts

Following Training

➢ Evaluate training to ensure continuous quality improvement

➢ Provide up-to-date, relevant, on-line resources for participants and trainers

“I believe 100% in face-to-face training but if we cannot it is a responsibility for us to train them on how to be safe.

We sometimes forget about the art of safety. We are forced in this time not to do face-to-face training, but we have members working today. We had to

look at the art side and find the next best avenue. Safety can never stop - no matter what obstacles are put in front of us.

Great job for CPWR staff and instructors to adapt and overcome to reach the members.”

Quote from Participant in the ICRA/COVID-19 Training (April 13, 2020)

Balancing the use of distance learning for health and safety training moving forward

How do you use what we have learned into future health and safety trainings?

Distance Learning for Health and

Safety Training

➢ Preliminary evidence of using the distance learning format to successfully deliver health and safety training designed in real time in response to a pandemic

➢ Research is needed to identify key trainee characteristics and training features using various formats and content in integrating into face-to-face offerings (blended learning, flipped classrooms)

➢ Consider expanding training outcomes to include measures of relationships (trust, cohesion, peer support)

➢ Strategic decision-making regarding use of distance technology to improve health and safety training systems

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Alicia Stachowski, Dr. Nancy Goldstein

• Gary Gustafson and Steve Surtees

• Rick Reinhart

• CPWR Instructors: Mike Finn, Ron Mahs, Jerry Marsden, George Newman, Tom Sundly, Jim Young

• Supported by NIEHS cooperative agreements ES006185 and ES009764

QUESTIONS?

SUE ANN SARPY, PH.D.

www.sarpyassociates.com