DESCRIPTION: A HISTORIAN’S...

transcript

HHIISSTTOORRYY 11 99 99 :: FFRREESSHHMMAANN SSEEMMIINNAARR WWIINNTTEERR 22001155

UU nn cc oo vv ee rr ii nn gg tt hh ee PP aa ss tt oo ff tt hh ee ““ RR ee aa ll ”” WW ii ll dd WW ee ss tt

Instructor: Kevin D. Hatfield Classroom: 122 McKenzie Hall Office: 120 Living Learning Center Meeting Time: UH 2:00‐3:50 Phone: 541‐346‐1977 Class Website: blackboard.uoregon.edu E‐Mail: kevhat@uoregon.edu CRN: 27059 Office Hours: Tuesdays, 4:00‐5:00pm Final Exam: 12:30pm, Monday, 3/ 16 Recurring Visiting Scholar: Jennifer O’Neal, University Historian and Archivist

I COURSE DESCRIPTION: A HISTORIAN’S APPRENTICESHIP

Areyoutiredoflearninghistoryfromatextbookandfill‐in‐the‐blanktests?Wouldyoupreferauniquechancetoinvestigateoriginalprimarysources,suchasletters,diaries,photographs,maps,

artifacts,campaignliterature,editorialcartoons,courttranscripts,oralinterviews,andgovernmentpropagandafilmstonameafew?Doesmostofyourknowledgeofthe“OldWest”comefromClintEastwoodfilms,televisionseriessuchasDeadwoodorHellonWheels,orvideogameslikeTheOregonTrailandRedDeadRedemption?Wouldyouenjoytheopportunitytorecovertheforgottenanddis‐rememberedvoicesandexperiencesofrealhistoricalactors,wholivedintheAmericanWest,fromthearchives,fieldtrips,anddynamicguestspeakers?Ifso,thisFreshman

Seminaroffersyoua“hands‐on”apprenticeshipinthehistorian’scraft.

Fornearly150yearstheAmericanWesthasfunctionedasthesynecdoche—thepartthatrepresentsthewhole—fortheUnitedStates.ThepopularcultureconstructionoftheAmericanWesthascometodefineAmericanidentity,character,andexceptionalism—whatisuniquelyandquintessentially“American”isoftenplacedinthecontextoftheWest.WilliamF.CodyarguablybecamethefirstmoderncelebrityduringtheAmericanandEuropeantoursofBuffaloBills“WildWest”fromthe1870sthroughtheearly20thCentury.BuffaloBillperformancesestablishedthetraditionofpopularcultureclaimingandexertingtheprimaryinfluenceofcreatingourcollective“knowledge”oftheAmericanWest.BuffaloBillfamouslycast“real”historicalactorsfromtheWest—SittingBull,KickingBear,RedShirt,AnnieOakley,cowboys—andrighteouslyassertedthathisperformancesrepresented“authentic”and“realistic”historicalre‐enactmentsofeventsfromtheWildWest.BuffaloBillbristledattheuseoftheword“show”forhisacts,believingitfalselydiminishedhisworkastawdry“entertainment”or“recreation”fortheaudience,whenincontrast,hebelievedhedeliveredhisperformancesas“historylessons”andhistroupeasan“educationalinstitution”forgenerationswhowouldnotgrowuponthefrontier.BuffaloBillbecamea“culturalauthority”inhisownrightthroughhisre‐enactmentsofmomentsof“conquest”and“colonization,”suchasthe“Custer’sLastStand”andthe“StageCoachAttack,”andultimatelysetapatternofcredentialingpopularcultureportrayalsoftheAmericanWestthroughthe“incorporation”ofindigenouspeoples—apracticethatwouldseamlesslytransitionfromthefieldandstagetothesilverscreenofsilentfilmandlatertalkiesandtelevision.Consequently,adominantcultureethnocentricandcolonialvisionandrememberingoftheAmericanWesthasmaintainedatenaciousholdonourcollectivememoryandknowledge.ThisportrayaloftheAmericanWesthasconventionally,obscuredthedevelopmentofamulti‐culturalregionthatbecamethecrossroadsforimmigrantsandpeoplesdescendingfromEurope,Asia,CentralAmerica,andAfrica—allofwhomenteredaculturallandscapealreadyoccupiedbydiverseindigenouspeoples.

ThiscoursewillengagestudentsinaseriesofscaffoldedanalyticalexercisescomparingthispopularcultureportrayaloftheAmericanWestbystage,film,televisionandvoiceactorswiththeactualhistoryoftheAmericanWestasrecountedthroughthefirst‐handexperiencesof“historicalactors”wholivedintheAmericanWest.Theclassdiscussions,small‐groupprimarysourceexercises,andtake‐homemidtermwillpreparestudentsfortheircapstone“Reelv.RealHistory”InquiryProjects,whichwillprobeourcollectivememoryorimaginationofthe“OldWest,”andinterrogatehow20th(and21st)centurynovels,film,television,videogames,duderanches,themeparks,re‐enactments,andotherpopularculturerepresentationshaveconstructedperceptionsoftheAmericanWestthatoftendivergeradicallyfromtherealityofthepast.Thestudents’originalresearchprojectswillbegintounpackthisquestionbyteasingoutfactfromfictioninour“memories”or“knowledge”ofthistimeandplace,andclarifyingtheblurredlinesbetweenhistory,myth,andfolklore.StudentswillcontributetoagrowingbodyofscholarshipandcreativeworkbyNativeandnon‐Nativehistorians,anthropologists,novelists,filmmakers,andartistsactivelydecolonizingthe“BuffaloBill”tradition.Intermsofhowstudentswill“learn”historyinthiscourse,theapprenticeshipwillreorientstudentsfroma"factsfirst"approachor"contentcoverage"modeloflearninghistoryemphasizingthepassiveconsumptionofexpertknowledge,toaninquiry‐based"historicalthinking"modelthatpositionsstudentsasactiveproducersofhistory.Theapprenticeshipwillframehistoryasa“wayofknowing”anda“wayofthinking”ratherthananaccumulationofpastevents.Studentswill“do”history,andbegintopracticetheprocessandmethodologyofthediscipline.Asapprenticehistorians,studentswillperformoriginalresearchintheUniversityofOregonSpecialCollectionsandUniversityArchives(SCUA)andthroughdigitizedprimarysourcescollectedbytheinstructorfromvariouslocal,stateandnationalarchivesandrepositories.Studentswillalsoexperiencethechancetointerpretandauthortheirownnarrativesandexplanationsofthepast.Finally,theapprenticeshipwillintroducestudentstothemethodologyanddisciplinaryexpertiseofacademichistoriansthroughtheanalysisofsecondaryliterature(e.g.scholarlyarticlesandbooks).

II COURSE LEARNING OBJECTIVES Studentscompletingthishistorian'sapprenticeshipwill:

Improvehistoricalthinkingandinquiryskills(See“ANoteonPresentism&thePastastheIrreducibleOther”onpage15ofthissyllabus)

Becomeaccustomedtoreadingandinterpretingprimarysourcematerials,drawingtheirownconclusionsaboutthem,andusingthemtoconstructarguments

Applyhistoriographyandmethodologytohistoricalresearchandanalysisofprimaryandsecondarysources

Performscholarlywritingasaprocessofdisciplinarythinking

Applyhistoricalconcepts(e.g.,causation,agency,contingency,continuity/change)toprimarysourceresearchandanalysis

Strengthenevidence‐basedargumentationandreasoning(e.g.,empirical,inferential,inductive)

Developandstrengthentheirmetacognition—theirconsciousandcriticalself‐reflectiononhowtheyarelearningandbeingtaught

CriticallyengageessentialquestionsandimprovecontentknowledgeofAmericanWesthistory

III SUCCEEDING IN THE COURSE

Itisthestudent'sresponsibilitytoreadallsyllabuscontentcarefully,andconsultwiththeinstructoriftheyhaveanyquestionsorconcernsabouttherequirements,policiesormaterialcoveredintheclass.Thissyllabusisacriticalreferenceguideandresourcefortheentirecourse.Studentsshouldreviewthesyllabusbeforeeveryclasssessionandcontinuallyastheyperformcourserequirements.Successfulstudentshaveregularattendance,completereadingsbeforeattendingclasses,participateactivelyindiscussions,andmakeuseofofficehoursasnecessary.Overallparticipation,effortandanyimprovementsdemonstratedthroughoutthecoursewillbeconsideredwhendecidingfinalcoursegrades.

IV BOOK AND BOOK CHAPTER READINGS ScottZesch TheCaptured:ATrueStoryofAbductionbytheIndiansontheTexasFrontier

NewYork,St.Martin’sPress,2004 PhilipJ.Deloria IndiansinUnexpectedPlaces

Lawrence:UniversityPressofKansas,2004 PPRROOVVIIDDEEDDOONNBBLLAACCKKBBOOAARRDD

Excerpt:Introduction&Chapter2“REPRESENTATION:IndianWars,theMovie”

V EVALUATION A) Primary Source Interpretation Exercises & Reports: (2 @ 20 points each)

Studentswillbegintheirhistorian’sapprenticeshipsandhoningtheirhistoricalcraftskillsandknowledgefortheculminatinghistoricalinquiryprojectbyperformingtwopracticeprimarysourceanalysisexercisesbasedonsmallcollectionsofmaterials.Thesesmallgroupexerciseswillofferworkshopsforstudentstoengageinthinkingcritically,framinghistoricalquestions,interpretingprimarysources,assessingevidence,andwritingexplanatorynarratives.StudentswillperformthefirstexerciseinSpecialCollectionswithoriginalmanuscriptsandartifacts,andenjoytheopportunitytosurveyarangeofpotentialtopicsandsourcesfortheirhistoricalinquiryprojects.Thesecondexerciseembodiesarole‐playing“game”inspiredbytheReactingtothePast(RTTP)curriculum,andstudentswill“enact”aChineseExclusionActTrialbaseduponfirst‐personrecordsofaChineseExclusionActCaseFile.Fullinstructionsforeachexercisewillbeprovidedseparately.Bothprimarysourceexerciseswillbeprefacedwithintroductorylecturescontextualizingthetopics.Theinstructorwilldistributespecificinstructionsandbibliographiesforeachprimarysourceexercise.Studentswillcomposeindividualtwo‐tothree‐pagereports(500to750words)thatpresenttheirnarrativeinterpretationoftheessentialquestionsinvestigatedforeachexercise.Thetwoprimarysourcesetsincludematerialscreatedbymultipleauthors,bearingconflicting,contradictory,andincompleteevidence,aswellasfragmentaryanddiscretenarrativesthatposeacreativechallengetohistorians.Thesecollaborativeexerciseswillallowstudentstoexplorepointsofconsensusanddivergenceregarding:1)thethematicinterpretationofspecificsources—theirauthorship,perspective,language,bias,

ImportantNote:Studentsmustreturnalloptionalmaterials(e.g.,books,DVDs,VHSTapes)borrowedfromtheinstructorBYTHEENDOFTHETERMTORECEIVEAFINALGRADE.

veracity/authenticity,completeness,andreliability;and2)thebroaderinterpretationoftheoverallsubject—howrepresentativearetheexperiencesofthesehistoricalactors?Theexercisesintroducestudentstotheconceptandprocessof“historiography”—howdohistoriansassignmeaningtopastandreachcontrastinginterpretationsandexplanationswhenanalyzingthesameempiricalevidence?Finally,theexercisescapturetheuncertainty,contingency,andfluidityofthepast.Thesetwoin‐classinquiry‐basedgroupexerciseswillpreparestudentstoperformoriginalon‐sitearchivalresearchforthe“Reelv.RealHistory”inquiryprojects.Consulttheguide,“AdviceonHowtoApproachthePrimarySourceInterpretationExercises”onpage14ofthissyllabus,andpostedinBlackboard.1. EXERCISE1:DiscoveringDisrememberedVoices:ReconstructingthePastofRace,Gender,Class

intheAmericanWest

GroupA:"PioneerMothers:"ReflectionsofWomanhoodandFemininityinOregonTrailDiaries GroupB:SettlerColonialism&ResettlementofIndigenousPeoples:TreatieswiththeUmpquaandKalapuya1854,1855/SiletzReservationMaps GroupC:OregonFreeSoilIdeology,BlackExclusionandAnti‐Slavery:BlackExclusionLaws&CaseFilesofTheophilusMagruderv.JacobVanderpool(1851);RobinHolmesv.NathanielFord(1852–53);andAbnerandO.B.Francis(1851) GroupD:ThePedagogyofEthnocideandAssimilation:ChemawaIndianBoardingSchoolandWarmSpringsReservationSchoolRecords

GroupE:Rodeosandthe"VanishingRace":Romanticizingthe"OldWest"throughtheEyeoftheCamera:WalterS.BowmanPhotographs,1890–1925andLeeMorehousePhotographs,1888–1925

2. EXERCISE2:GamSaan&theUnassimilables:ChineseImmigration,Exclusion&Sinophobia:

ChineseExclusionActTrialofChanChowMow

B) Group Discussion Facilitators & Written Questions (10 points possible: 5 points for posting; 5 points for discussion facilitation)

NOTE:Allstudentsmustcompleteallthereadingforeverybookdiscussion,however,thefacilitationgroupwillhelpframethediscussionfortheday. Toexploremajorcoursethemesthroughthesingleassignedbook—ScottZesch’sTheCaptured—theclasswillbearrangedinto“DiscussionFacilitationGroups”comprisingtwotofivestudentstoengagestudentsinreadingdiscussions.Eachgroupwillbeassignedtwochaptersthebook(usuallyabout40‐50pages).Foreachscheduleddiscussion,the“DiscussionFacilitationGroups”forthatdaywilldeliverbriefintroductionsthatframethemajorthemes,arguments,andmethodologyoftheirparticularsection.EachmemberofthefacilitatinggroupwillpreparetwohistoricalquestionstoposetotheclassthroughtherespectiveBlackboardDiscussionForumsavailableforeachbook,nolaterthanthedaypriortotheirdiscussion.Studentswillframebroadlyanalyticalquestionsthatcontemplateprimaryarguments,interpretations,themes,sources,andmethodology,insteadofcontent‐specific,narrowlyfactualquestions.

C) Take‐Home Midterm: Comparative Source Analysis: The Captured and The Searchers (30 points possible) Asinhabitantsofthe21stCentury,ourcollectivememoryofthe“OldWest”oftenreflectsthe20th‐Century“Reel”historyofHollywoodwesterncinemamorethanthe19th‐Century“Real”historyoftheAmericanWest.Thistake‐homemidtermprovidesstudentsanopportunitytocomparethehistoricalreconstructionofinter‐culturalrelationshipsandacculturationasportrayedbydirectorJohnFordinhisfilm,TheSearchers(1956),andhistorianScottZeschinhisaward‐winningbook,TheCatpured.Thetake‐homemidtermalsofunctionsasanotherprogressive“practice”exercisepreparingstudentsfortheirculminatinghistoricalinquiryprojects.Studentswillanswerfouroutofeightquestionsina“short‐answer”format.Eachanswershouldbeapproximatelythreetofourparagraphsinlengthandprovidedabriefanalyticalresponsetothequestionsupportedbyevidencedrawnfromthebook,film,andclassdiscussion.Answersdonotneedtobecomprehensiveintheiranalyticalscopeorfactualcontent.Besuccinctandsubstantive,andpresentthemostillustrativeexampleyouhave.Althoughasuccinctdiscussionofhistoricalaccuracy(actualtruth)orverisimilitude(appearanceoftruth)maycompriseacomponentofyourcommentary,studentsshouldavoidpreparinganexhaustivecatalogofanachronismsanddeviationsfromliteralreality.Instead,yourshortanswersshouldapproachthefilmasadramaticvehicleorartform—grantingthatitisnotanon‐fictionaldocumentary—andfocusonthe“vision,”“imagination,”“perception”or“myth”oftheAmericanWestfashionedbyplotdevelopment,narrativestructure,characterformation,dialoguepresentation,performances,direction,andothercinematictechniques.

D) Historical Inquiry Project: “Reel versus Real History” (120 points possible) The“ReelversusRealHistory”historicalinquiryprojectrepresentstheculminatingintellectualexerciseof

thecourse,andintentionallybuildsupontheknowledgeandskillsstudentshavecultivatedas“apprenticehistorians”inpreviousclassdiscussions,theVisitingScholarssession,thetwoPrimarySourceInterpretationExercises,andtheTake‐HomeMidtermcomparativeanalysisofdirectorJohnFord’sfilmTheSearchersandhistorianScottZesch’sTheCaptured.

CinemahasprofoundlyshapedourhistoricalmemoryandcollectiveimaginationoftheAmericanWest.

Hollywoodhasconstructedamodernmythologyofindigeneity,race,class,gender,violence,nationalidentity,Americancharacter,democracy,immigration,landscape,region,frontier,andgeneralprofilesofindividualsandcommunitiesintheWest.Despitethefolkloricpatinaofthemedium,manyfilmsreflectkernelsoftruthregardingboththeerastheydepictandthetimesinwhichtheywerecreated.Forexample,toapresentaudience,JohnFord’sSergeantRutledge(1960)mayrevealmoreaboutColdWarracialtensionsthantheexperiencesofAfrican‐American“buffalosoldiers”servinginthepost‐CivilWarcavalryinthe1870s.

Thisexercisewillalloweachstudenttoselectahistoricaltopicoftheirpassionandcraftauniquehistoricalquestiontoinvestigateaparticularaspectofthistopic.Withtheinstructor’sguidance,studentswillidentifyapopularcultureartifact—typicallyafeaturefilm,televisionseriesepisode(s),orvideogame—andasmallcollectionoforiginalprimarysourcematerialsthatbothengagethestudents’selectedtopic.SimilartotheTake‐HomeMidterm,the“ReelversusReal”historicalinquiryprojectenablesstudentstocriticallyanalyzehowapopularculturedepictionoftheirtopiccompareswithoriginalprimarysourceevidence.Whereas,theTake‐HomeMidtermaskedstudentstocomparethetopicsof“captivity,acculturation,race,andinterculturalcontact/conflict”betweenafilmandthepublishedscholarshipofahistorian,the“ReelversusRealHistory”projectpositionsstudentstocompareapopularcultureartifactwithoriginalprimarysources(ratherthanasimplyabook).Whenpossibletheinstructorwillencouragestudentstopulldifferenttopics

outofthesamefilm,televisionepisode,orvideogame.Theinstructorwillsharealistoffilmsandtelevisionepisodes,aswellaslistsofpotentialtopics,primarysourcecollections/resources,andpaststudentprojects.TheclasswillalsoperformresearchintheUOLibrariesonseveralfieldresearchtripsunderthementorshipoftheinstructorandassistancefromlibrarians,archivists,andspecialcollectionsstaff.Thisprojectisnotintendedtorepresentafull‐scaleresearchpaper,butratherafocusedcomparativeanalysisofaspecificfilmwithspecificprimarysources/sourcecollection.

Theinstructorhasorganizedthe“ReelVersusRealHistory”projectintosevensteps.Eachstepfunctionsasa

milestoneorcheck‐inpointduringtheresearchandwritingprocess,andfostersacriticalfeedbackloopbetweenthestudentandinstructorthroughsubstantivewrittencommentaryandone‐on‐onetutorialadvising.Despitetheconsecutiveorderofthesteps,studentsareencouragedtoapproachhistoricalresearchandwritingasareciprocal,ratherthanstrictlylinear,exercise.Thestepsrepresentthebuildingblocksor“work‐in‐progress”iterationsoftheoverallresearchproject,andnotdiscrete“finalproducts.”Muchofthewritingperformedforthesestepswillultimatelybeincorporatedinthefinaloralpresentationsandpapers.Forexample,itisexpectedthatfurtherprimarysourceresearchwillinformandre‐fashiontheinitialhistoricalquestion,whereasprogressivewritingwillidentifygapsinprimarysourceanalysisandnecessitateadditionalresearchandthediscoveryofnewsources.Ultimately,thestepsintendtoreinforcea“metacognitiveconsciousness”amongstudentsaslearners,practitioners,andproducersofhistory,andremainreflectiveandself‐awareoftheirthinkingandreasoning.

Step One: Selecting the Topic & Film [10 Points]

DUE:One‐page(250words)proposalexplainingselectionoftopicandfilmInstructions:Studentsconferringwiththeinstructor,andpreferablycollaboratinginsmallgroupsofthreetofivememberswillidentifyaneffectivefilm(s)/televisionepisode(s)/videogamefortheirinquiryproject,andwillhaveanopportunitytoperformaninitialviewingoftheirpopularcultureartifactinclass.Ultimately,eachstudent/groupmemberwillexamineaunique,yetcomplementarythemebycomparingacomponentofthefilmwithspecificprimarysourcematerialsandevidence.Eachstudentwillsubmitaone‐page(250words)proposalidentifyingtheirfilmandtopic.

Studentsandgroupsmaybegintheirresearchbyperusingfilmreviewscomposedbycontemporaryfilmcritics,andhistoricalessayscritiquingthefilmwrittenbyacademichistorians.Theinstructorwilldistributealistoffilms/televisionepisodesavailableinhisprivatecollectionforuseintheclass.Theinstructorwillalsopurchasefilms/televisionseriesasneededfortheclass.Theinstructordoesnothaveavideogamecollection.Studentsshouldbeawareofthefollowingresources:

InternetMovieDatabase(imdb.com) JournalofAmericanHistory(availableinfull‐texton‐line)[filmreviewsection] Kilpatrick,CelluloidIndians:NativeAmericansandFilm Marubbio,KillingtheIndianMaiden:ImagesofNativeAmericanWomeninFilm Slotkin,GunfighterNation Carnes,ed.PastImperfect:HistoryAccordingtotheMovies Collins&O’Connor,eds.Hollywood’sWest:TheAmericanFrontierinFilm,Television,&History Cowie,JohnFordandtheAmericanWest Coyne,TheCrowdedPrairie:AmericanNationalIdentityintheHollywoodWestern Roquemore,HistoryGoestotheMovies

Step Two: Framing Historical Questions & Identifying Primary Sources [20 Points]

DUE:One‐page(250words)narrativeofhistoricalquestion(s)[10points];ANDone‐page(nowordcount)annotatedbibliography(minimumoffivesources)[10points]Instructions:

i. HistoricalQuestions

BasedonthetopicchoseninStepOne,studentswillbegincraftinganeffectivehistoricalquestiontoguidetheirprimarysourceresearchandfilm/televisionepisode/videogameanalysis.Studentswillcomposeatwo‐tothree‐paragraph(approximately250words)historicalquestion.First,beginthisprocessbyfocusingthetopicintoamorerefinedhistoricalinquirybytighteningthegeographic,chronological,and/orthematic/theoreticalscope.Avoidquestionsthatareeithertoonarrowortoobroadtoanswereffectively.Studentmayalsobegintoarticulatetheirworkinghypothesis,argument,orinterpretationinresponsetoyourquestion.Ultimately,questionsshouldlinktheoriginalprimarysourceresearchtothefilm/televisionepisode/videogame.Seeexamplesbelow:

WhatfactorscausedvigilanteviolenceintheAmericanWest? Whatwasthedifferencebetweena“lynching”anda“hanging?” Whywerelynchingsandhangingspublicspectacles? Whatroledidrace,class,andgenderplayinviolence? Whywerevictimsoflynchingsoftentorturedbeforedeathandtheircorpsesmutilated

postmortem? Howwasmasculinityconstructedthroughsuchviolence? HowdospecificincidentsofvigilantejusticeintheAmericanWestcomparetothedepiction

ofunjustexecutioninWilliamWellman’s1943film,TheOx‐BowIncident? Whyareraceandviolence/torturedownplayedbyWellman?

ii. AnnotatedBibliography

Eachstudent/groupmemberwillfindsufficientprimarysourcestoconducttheircomparativeanalysis(consultyourclasshandoutforexplanationofprimary/secondarysources).Sourcesmayincludegovernmentdocuments,personalletters/diaries,memoirs/autobiographies,courtrecords,historicalnewspapers/magazines,photographs,maps,oralinterviews,sheetmusic,soundrecordings,andnumerousotherprimarysources.Studentswillprepareaannotatedbibliographywithaminimumoffivesourcecitations.Anannotatedbibliographyoffersyourreaderthesourcecitationandadditionalinformationandcommentaryaboutthesourcesyoucite(e.g.sourcetype,creator/author),andclarifieshowthecontentofthesourcematerialisrelevanttoyourresearch.Researchersshouldcreatetheirannotatedbibliographiesconcurrentwiththeperformanceoftheirprimarysourceresearch,andusethebibliographyasaworkingresourcetodocumentandtracktheirexaminationofprimaryandsecondarysources.Theinstructorwilldistributeacitationguidetoassiststudentswithformattingtheannotatedbibliography.

ThedisciplineofhistoryfollowstheChicagoManualofStyle(CMS)(nowinits16thedition)citationandeditorialsystem.MosthistoryundergraduateandgraduatestudentsconsultanabbreviatedversionoftheCMSauthoredbyKateL.Turabiantitled,AManualforWritersofResearchPapers,Theses,andDissertations8thEd.(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,2013).ForthoseofyoupursuingadegreeinhistoryIwouldencourageyoutopurchaseacopyofthisinvaluablereference.

Step Three: Paper Outline/Concept Map [5 points] DUE:One‐page(nowordcount)outlineofpaperInstructions:Studentswillprepareaone‐page(nowordcount)schematicoutlineoftheirpaper.Thecognitiveprocessof“outlining”assistsresearcherswithorganizingtheirthinkingandreasoning,andthetranslationofprimaryandsecondarysourceevidenceintoacoherentnarrative.Outlinesmayrevealdeficienciesinempiricaldataorincompleteanalysis.Althoughsomestudentsmaychoosetoperformtheiroutlineinaconventionalhierarchicalstructureofheadingsandsubheadingstodemonstraterelationshipsandorderingofideas,studentsarewelcometouseanyformatthatbestmatchestheircreativeprocess.ConceptMaps,IdeaMapsorothervisualthinkingtoolsthatdiagramthestructureofcontentandanalysisarewelcome.

Step Four: Peer Evaluation [10 points] DUE:FirstDraftofFinalPaper(fourtofivepages/1,000to1,250words)[SubmittoPeerEvaluator); ANDPeerCritiqueofPartnersPaperIncludingeditorialmarksanda150‐to200‐wordCritiqueInstructions:

i. PaperDraftsToensurestudentsreceivethemosteffectiveevaluationsfromtheirpeers,paperdraftsshouldaspiretoincludethefollowingelements:

1. Introduction

Theintroductionofthepaperiscriticaltoitsoverallcoherenceandclarity.Theintroductionfunctionsastheinitialhookanddirectoryforthereader—itsimultaneouslydrawstheminandbeginstoguidethemthroughyourresearchandanalysis.Studentsareencouragedtoperformtwoself‐teststodetermineiftheintroductioniswellorganizedandclearlyarticulated.First,readtheintroductionoutloudandconsiderwhetherthefourelementshavebeenaddressed.Second,afterthecompletionofthefirstdraftofthepaper,readthefirstsentenceofeachsubsequentparagraphoutloudandconsiderwhetherthepaperstillmakessense—hasthepaperfollowedthenarrative/analyticalpathsetoutbytheintroduction?

2. SubheadingsandTopicSentences

Theelementsincorporatedthroughouttheessaywillserveassignpoststhatcontinuetonavigatethereadertowardtheconclusion.Theauthor’soverridingresponsibilityistopilotthereaderthroughthenarrative.Afterreadingtheintroduction,thereadershouldfirmlygraspthefollowing:1)thegeneraltopic;2)thehistoricalquestion;3)thethesis,oranswerto/interpretationofthequestion;and4)principalcomparativepoints.

3. Quotations

Incorporatingquotationsfromyourprimarysourcematerialsanddialoguefromfilms,televisionepisodes,orvideogameswillprovideanopportunityforyourpeerevaluatortoassessthecontentandeffectivenessofthisimportantcomponentofyourpaper.Quotationscanconveythevoiceofhistoricalactorfromyourprimarysourcesandtheatrical/voiceactorsformyourfilm,televisionepisode,videogamethatcapturesamood,tone,oridiosyncrasiesthatwouldbemutedorlostthroughparaphrasing.Theycanalsopresentevidenceinasuccinctmanner.

4. Footnotes

Thepeerevaluatorwillneedtoknowthesourceofyourevidenceanddirectquotations.Theinclusionoffootnotesinthedraftwillalsoprovideanopportunityforthepeerevaluator(andinstructor)toofferfeedbackonformattingandmissingcitationdata.

ii. PeerEvaluation

Studentswillformpairsandexchangethefirstdraftsoftheirpaperswiththeirpeerevaluator.StudentswillemailtheirfirstdraftstotheirpartnerandtheinstructorinMSWordformattoenablethepeerevaluatortoperformeditsin“TrackChanges”modeandincludetheirnarrativecritiqueatthebottomofthepaper.Peerevaluatorswillreadtheirpartner’spapercarefullyandprovideajudiciousbalanceofdirectiveandfacilitativefeedbackthroughcopyeditingmarks,marginalcomments,andaformalone‐pagecritique(150–200words).Directivefeedbackwillofferprescriptiveinstructionsforspecificchangesandimprovements,suchascorrectionstospelling,punctuation,grammar,andformatting.Facilitativefeedbackwillsharesuggestivequestionsandcommentarythatengagebroaderanalyticalpointsregardingorganization,arguments,sources,analysis,clarity,andstructure.Peerevaluatorsshouldapplyparticularattentiontotheintroduction,thesis,andtopicsentences.Additionally,peerevaluatorsshouldscrutinizetheuseofevidencefromthefilmandprimarysources.Howeffectivelyhasthewriterparaphrasedorquotedprimarysources?Howconsistentlyandfullyhasthewritercitedprimarysourcedataintheirfootnotes/endnotes?Finally,doestheconclusionreassertandstrengthenthethesisstatement?Everystudentmustcompleteapeercritique.ThisexerciseassignspointstothePeerEvaluatorNOTtheevaluatee.Peerevaluatorswillreturntheeditedpapersandnarrativecritiqueviaemailtotheirpartnersandcopytheinstructor.

Step Five: Presentation Outline (Group or Individual) [5 points] DUE:PresentationOutline(100–200words)Instructions:Studentswilldraftascriptoroutlineforafinaloralpresentation(fivetosixminutesinduration)oftheirhistoricalinquiryprojectstotheclass.Presentationswillscreenaselectedsceneorscenecompilation,sharetheirprimarysources,andexplaintheirfindings/analysis.StudentsareencouragedtoprepareaPowerPoint,Keynote,Preziorothermultimediapresentationwithembeddedfilmscenesanddigitalimagesofprimarysources.Presentationswillalsoallowtimeforquestionsfromtheclass.Studentselectingtopresentwithpeerssharingacommonfilm/televisionseries/videogamewillcoordinatetheorderoftheirpresentationsandareencouragedtocompiletheirindividualpresentationsintoonePowerPointfileifpossible.PresentationoutlineswillincludeALLthefollowingelements:

1. Statementofgroup’s/individual’stopic(s)orhistoricalquestion(s)

2. Descriptionofeachgroupmember’sfilmsceneandfilmicelementanalyzed

3. Descriptionandcitationofeachgroupmember’sprimarysources

4. Summaryofeachgroupmember’scomparativeanalysisbetweenthefilmandprimarysources

5. Cues(startandstoptimes)forscreeningfilmscenes(ifnotembeddedinPowerPointpresentationorcompiledinseparatemovingimagefile)

Step Six: Final Oral Presentation [10 points] DUE:OralPresentation(5–6minutesmaximum)Instructions:Studentswillshowcasethefindingsoftheirhistoricalinquiryprojectsduring5–6minuteindividualpresentations.Everystudentwilldeliveranoralpresentationnolongerthan6minutes.Somestudentsmaychoosetopresentwithpeerssharingacommonfilm/televisionseries/videogame,however,eachstudentisstillrequiredtopresentindividuallyfor5to6minutes.ThepresentationswillbescheduledforDeadWeekandFinalsWeek.Theinstructorwilldistributeanoralpresentationevaluationrubrictostudents.

Step Seven: Individual Analysis Paper [50 points]

DUE:IndividualAnalysisPaper(seespecificrequirementsbelow)Instructions:Studentswillcomposeafour‐to‐fivepageresearchpaperthatoffersacomparativeanalysisoftheirhistoricaltopicandhistoricalquestionbetweentheirselectedfilm/televisionepisode/videogameandprimarysourcematerials.Essayswillpresentacriticalanalysisofaparticularquestionortheme,andnotsimplysummarizeordescribecontent.Essayswillalsoincorporatequotesfromthefilmandprimarysourcestocapturethevoicesoffictionalandhistoricalactors.Studentswillalsoprovidefullcitationsforallsourcesandcitealldirectquotes.PleasefindbelowastructuraloutlineforyourfinalIndividualAnalysisEssay.Thisisasuggestedoutline,andyouarewelcometoadoptanalternateformat:

1. Introduction.Clarifytopic,thesis,andprincipalpointsofcomparison.2. Briefsummaryoffilm/televisionseries/videogame.Focusonkeyelementsrelevanttoyour

question.3. Briefsummaryofprimarysourceresearch.Whatwasthestructureoftheresearch—casestudy;

historicalactor;historicalevent—andwhattypesofsourceswereresearched?4. Comparativeanalysis.Thisisthebody/coreoftheessay.Analyzethespecificprimarysources

youexaminedandthespecificscenes/filmicelementfocusedupon.Assertyourkeyarguments,interpretations,findings.

5. Conclusion.Reassertyourthesisandunderscoreyouranalysisofthemainthemeoftheproject.

Allfinalversionsofpaperswillconformtothefollowingformatrequirements:

EditorialStyle: ChicagoManualofStyle(CMS)/Turabian

Length: 4to5pages(1,000to1,250words)

Margins: 1”left,right,topandbottomFontSize: 11or12pointLineSpacing: double‐spacePagination: pagenumbersrequired;placementisauthor’schoiceCitations: footnotesorendnotes(parentheticalreferencesnotaccepted)TitlePage: includepapertitle/subtitle,authorname,date,course,instructornameDeliveryFormat: electronicMSWordfileformat

Quotes: quotationslongerthanfourlinesoftextwillbeblockformatted;seeTurabianfor

blockquoteformattinginstructions E) Participation & Tutorial Meeting with Professor (10 points possible)

Thesuccessofthisseminardependsontheregularattendanceandactiveparticipationofallstudentstofosterpeercommunity,stimulateintellectualcuriosity,sustaindialogue,andengageincollaborativeresearch.Anyunacceptable,non‐documentedabsences(seesection“VIPolicyonMissedDeadlines,Absences&Incompletes”below)ofthreesessionsandabovewillresultinthereductionofyourfinalcoursegradebyonecompletegrade.Eachstudentwillalsoscheduleaone‐on‐onetutorialappointmentwiththeinstructorbytheendofweekfivetodiscusstheinquiryproject.

TToottaall PPoossssiibbllee PPooiinnttss ffoorr EEnnttiirree CCoouurrssee == 220000 ppooiinnttss

FFiinnaall CCoouurrssee GGrraaddee BBrreeaakkddoowwnn PPooiinnttss:: 117777 aanndd aabboovvee == AA PPooiinnttss:: 115522 –– 115566 == BB-- PPooiinnttss:: 112277 –– 113322 == DD++ 117711 –– 117766 == AA-- 114466 –– 115511 == CC++ 111199 –– 112266 == DD 116655 –– 117700 == BB++ 113399 –– 114455 == CC 111144 –– 111188 == DD-- 115577 –– 116644 == BB 113333 –– 113388 == CC-- 111133 aanndd bbeellooww == FF

VI COURSE BLACKBOARD SITE TheBlackboardSiteforHistory199offersseveralvaluableinstructionalfunctions.First,theinstructorwillpostallcoursematerials,includingthesyllabus,lectureoutlines,powerpointslideshows,andotherhandoutsinthe“CourseDocuments”sectionofBlackboard.TheBlackboardsitewillalsohosttheforumsfortheZeschDiscussion,aswellasthegradebookforthecourse.

VII UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT POLICY Allworksubmittedinthiscoursemustbeyourownandproducedexclusivelyforthiscourse.Youmustacknowledgeanddocumenttheideasandwordsofothers.Thepresentationofun‐citedorun‐acknowledgematerialacquiredfromanysource—written,verbal,online—isdefinedasplagiarism.Violationsaretakenseriouslyandarenotedonstudentdisciplinaryrecords.Pleaseconsulttheinstructorifyouhavemorespecificquestionsaboutthedefinitionofplagiarism.TheStudentConductCodefor“AcademicMisconduct”isavailableforreview:http://uodos.uoregon.edu/StudentConductandCommunityStandards/AcademicMisconduct/tabid/248/Default.aspxVIII POLICY ON MISSED DEADLINES, ABSENCES & INCOMPLETES Toensureequitabilityintheevaluationofallstudents,allwrittenassignmentsaredueinclass,ormustbepostedinBlackboardatthestateddeadlinesinthissyllabus,unlessstudentshaveadocumentedacceptableexcuse(seebelow).Studentsmaynotmake‐upthefollowingassignments:bookdiscussionfacilitation&Blackboarddiscussionforumquestions,primarysourceanalysisexercises&reports,researchprojectpresentationassignment.Anywrittenassignmentnotsubmittedinhardcopyformatbythespecifieddeadlinewillresultinthepenaltyofanautomaticdeductionofhalfofthetotalpossiblepoints(i.e.,20pointpaperisworthonly10points)thatmaybeearned.Writtenassignmentssubmittedmorethan24hourslatewillnotbeaccepted.Writtenassignmentsturnedinbye‐mailwillreceivenopoints.Itisthestudent’sresponsibilitytoinitiatecontactwiththeinstructor.Thefinalgradereportedtotheregistrarwillbebasedupontheworkthestudenthascompletedbytheendoftheterm,whichmaywellresultinafailinggrade.A) ExceptionalEmergencySituations

Thefollowingareunforeseen/incontrollableexceptionalemergencysituationsthatareacceptableexcusesformisseddeadlinesorabsenceswithoutpenalty,andissuanceofincomplete(I)finalgradesattheendofthecourse:1)documentedseriousillness/injury;2)documentedimmediatefamilyemergency.Studentsshouldplantheirschedulesaccordinglyasabsencesand/orinabilitytomeetassignmentdeadlinesduetopersonal(e.g.,familyreunions/visits,weddings,work‐schoolconflicts)ortechnological(e.g.,savedpaperis"missing"orwillnotopen,printerranoutofink)reasonswillnotbeexcused.

B) IssuanceofanIncompleteGrade

InaccordancewiththepolicyoftheUniversityofOregon,amarkofI(incomplete)maybereportedonlywhenthequalityofworkissatisfactorybutaminoryetessentialrequirementofthecoursehasnotbeencompleted.An“incomplete”willbegrantedin‐lieuoflettergradesonlyinexceptionalemergencysituationsasstipulatedabove,tostudentswhohavecompletedatleast85%ofallcourserequirementswithagradeofC+andabove,aswellas100%attendance(exceptionswillbegrantedforacceptableabsencesduetodocumentedexcusesasstipulatedabove).Studentsmustinformtheinstructorandalsosubmitdocumentedproofbeforetheendofthetermtoobtainanincompleteforthecourse.Theinstructorwillthennegotiatewiththestudenttodraftacontractontherequirementsanddeadlineforcompletionofcourserequirementsnecessarytocleartheincompletegrade.

IX ACCESSIBLE EDUCATION POLICY Theinstructoriscommittedtocreatinganinclusive,respectful,andaccommodatinglearningenvironmentforallstudentsinthecourse.Pleasenotifytheinstructorifthereareaspectsoftheinstructionordesignofthiscoursethatresultindisability‐relatedbarrierstoyourparticipation.StudentsarealsoencouragedtocontacttheAccessibleEducationCenter(formerlyDisabilityServices)in164OregonHallat346‐1155oruoaec@uoregon.edu,orvisittheirwebsiteataec.uoregon.edu/index.html.

** GUIDANCE ON SUCCEEDING IN THIS COURSE **

Guide:HowtoApproachtheSecondarySourceReadingsWhenyouengagethesecondarytextsforthiscourse,KilpatrickandZeschyoumayneedtoreorientyourapproachto"learning"history.Thiscoursedoesnotmeasurecognitiveandskillsdevelopmentwithinthedisciplineofhistoryby"testing"students'masteryofcontentknowledge—inotherwordshowmuchfactualinformationstudentscantemporarilymemorizeandreciteonamultiplechoice,matching,fill‐in‐the‐blank,orshort‐answerexamination.

Instead,thecourseassessesstudents'progressandfluencywiththe"process"ofproducinghistory—suchastheframinghistoricalquestions;formulatinghypothesisandarguments;composinganddefendingevidence‐basedinterpretations;examiningprimarysourcematerials;critiquingsecondarysources/scholarship;performingacademicwritingasaprocessofdisciplinarythinking(thinkinglikeahistorian).

WhenreadingthesecondarysourcesIwouldrecommendthefollowingstrategies:

1) Readthebookwithahistoriographical/methodologicallensratherthanacontentmemorizationlens.

2) Focusparticularattentionontheprologueand/orintroductionwheretheauthorarticulateshis/heressentialquestion,thesis,themes,methodology,andhistoriographicalapproach.

3) Skimmingcanbeausefultechniqueforsomelearningstyles.Scrutinizetheopeningandclosingparagraphsofeachchapter,andthefirstsentencesofeachparagraph.

4) Annotate!Ifyoudon'tplanonsellingyourbooksback,Iwouldhighlyencourageyoutowritemarginalcommentsthatdon'tsimplyrepeatthetext,butengageit!Posequestions,challengeconclusions,inspectsources.Writingortypingyourideas,orevenshortquotes,demonstratesamorecomplexcognitive

5) Donotreadthebookpassively—interactwiththebookasifitwereaconversationwiththeauthor.Also,ifyouemployahighlighter,dosowithgreatdiscretionandrestraint.Ifthepagesappearasifaflorescentyellowslugtrailhascoveredmostorallofthetext,thisisaclearindicationthatasareaderyoustillhaveonthe"contentmemorization"lens,andyouneedtochangecognitivespectacles.Highlightonlykeyanalyticalorinterpretivepoints,oraspecificquoteyouintendtowriteaboutinadiscussionforumoryourpaper.

6) Remember,secondarysourcesarereferencetoolsforthehistorian,andyoucanalwaysreturntothebookifyouneedtoretrievespecificdata/facts.Possessinganeideticorphotographicmemoryandtheabilitytorecallencyclopediclevelsoffactualdataisnotaprerequisiteskillsforhistorians.Infact,thisnotionisthestereotypicaldefinitionofhistoryandhistoriansthatemergesfromthepassiveand

reductionistmodelofhistoryassimplythememorizationandrecitationoffacts.Unfortunately,manyofuswereconditionedtolearnhistoryinthismodelandhavedevelopedpassivereading,writing,andlearninghabits.

7) Donotignorethefootnotesorendnotes.Thedocumentationsystem(citingspecificsourcestosupporttheprimarythesis/interpretation)isthefoundationtoallsecondaryliteratureandacademicscholarship.Italsorevealstheauthor's"process"ofreconstructingthepast.Asthereader,youneedtoscrutinizethesesourcessoyoucandeterminehowpersuasiveortenabletheauthor'sargumentorinterpretationmaybe.

8) Finally,whenyoucompetereadingasecondarysourceyoushouldhavenoproblemacutelydistillingandtellinganotherprospectivereaderpreciselywhattheauthor'sprincipalquestionandthesiswas,thestrengthsandweaknessesoftheirprincipalquestionandthesis,whatsourcestheyreliedupon,andwhetheryourwereconvincedbytheirthesis/interpretation.Thisisaneasiertasktoaccomplishifyoudonthose"historiographical"lensesandreorientyourapproachtoreadingthebook.

Itwilltakepracticetobreakoutof"contentcoverage"habits,andeachofthehistorianswewillreadthistermembracedifferentmethodologiesandphilosophyofhistory.Goodluck!

Guide:HowtoApproachthePrimarySourceInterpretationExercisesTheprimarysourceexercisesintendtoassiststudentswithframingacademicwritingasaprocessofdisciplinarythinking,andhelpstudentsbegintodeveloptheirvoicesashistoriansthroughtheprocessofinterpretingthe“voices”ofhistoricalactorsinthepast.Studentsalsobegintolearnthepracticalstepsofcriticallyengagingtextualandvisualprimarysources.Ratherthanreadingonlytomemorizecontent,thisexercisechallengesstudentstobeginthescholarlyworkofsharedorcollaborativeannotation.

Iamsureyouhaveallpurchasedusedbooksthathaveexcessivehighlightingofpassages,insomecaseschangingentirepagestoneonyellowororange.Thesepreviousreadersattemptedtoannotatethetextasamemoryaidormnemonicdevice,however,thepervasivehighlightingdemonstratestheyhadnotlearnedhowtoengageatextcritically.

Incontrast,youhaveprobablyalsopurchasedusedbooksthathaveselectivehighlights—identifyingkeypointsandarguments.Moreimportantly,youmayhavealsofoundinsightfulcommentarywritteninthemarginsthatraisequestions,ideas,theories,andcriticismthatenrichthebook,begintocreatenewknowledge,andactuallyenhanceyouranalysisofthebookasadownstreamreader.

Theseannotatorshavegonefarbeyondmemoryaids,toengagethetextandcritiquetheauthor’sarguments,sources,methodology,andevenwritingstyle.Theannotationsormarginaliaarethewrittenexpressionofthecognitiveprocessofcriticalreadingandanalysis—analogoustoshowingyourworkinmathleadingtothesolutionofaproblem.

Theannotatorhasbeguntoreorganize,interpret,andassignmeaningtothetext—especiallywhenthisprocessisappliedtoprimarysources.Annotationbecomesaformofscholarshiporscholarlypracticeinandofitself.

Iencourageallofyoutoengageinthissharedannotationandknowledgecreation.Thiswillbeessentialifyouhopetopresentthemostpersuasiveargument.Engagetheevidence.Reworkthedata.Constructatimelineofevents.Assembleaglossaryoftermsandnames.Craftaspreadsheetcomparingcontradictoryevidence.Ultimately,youwillneedtodevelopyourownthesisbyorganizingthehistoricaldataintothemostconvincingandcrediblenarrativeexplanationofevents.

X COURSE SCHEDULE AND ASSIGNMENTS

Note: It is imperative that students complete weekly assigned readings before in‐class discussions

DATE DUE AGENDAWEEK1 DeconstructingtheAmericanWest:AnImaginedPlace&ProcessU1/6

ThoughtExperiment:Whatdoyouknow?Howdoyouknowit?Howdidyoulearnit?

FilmSession/DiscussionI:TheColonialLens:ImaginingandRe‐EnactingtheOldWestThroughStage&Film1872–1950s

R1/8 FilmSession/DiscussionII:TheDecolonizingLens:Indigeneity&Re‐ImaginingtheOldWestThroughIndianandSettlerSocietyAllyVoices,1960s‐2014

Discussion:RoadmaptoYour11Apprenticeship(Syllabus&CourseStructureReview)

WEEK2U1/13

ReadingDiscussionA:Deloria,"Introduction"andChapter2:"REPRESENTATION:IndianWars:TheMovie”Presentation:TheClosingFrontier?TheWorld’sColumbianExposition,FrederickJacksonTurner’s“FrontierThesis”andAntimodernismDUE:DiscussionAQuestionsPostedinDiscussionForum

R1/15 FieldTrip:ClassMeetsatSpecialCollections&UniversityArchives(SCUA)

Presentation:DiscoveringDisrememberedVoices:ReconstructingthePastofRace,Gender,andClassintheAmericanWest(ContextforPrimarySourceExercise)

PrimarySourceExercise1,Day1:IntroductiontoSCUAbyJenniferO'Neal,UniversityHistorianandArchivistandLindaLong,ManuscriptsLibrarian;MeetinSpecialCollectionsandUniversityArchivesGroupA:"PioneerMothers:"ReflectionsofWomanhoodandFemininityinOregonTrailDiaries

GroupB:SettlerColonialism&ResettlementofIndigenousPeoples:TreatieswiththeUmpquaandKalapuya1854,1855/SiletzReservationMaps

GroupC:OregonFreeSoilIdeology,BlackExclusionandAnti‐Slavery:BlackExclusionLaws&CaseFilesofTheophilusMagruderv.JacobVanderpool(1851);RobinHolmesv.NathanielFord(1852–53);andAbnerandO.B.Francis(1851)

GroupD:ThePedagogyofEthnocideandAssimilation:ChemawaIndianBoardingSchoolandWarmSpringsReservationSchoolRecords

GroupE:Rodeosandthe"VanishingRace":Romanticizingthe"OldWest"throughtheEyeoftheCamera:WalterS.BowmanPhotographs,1890–1925;andLeeMorehousePhotographs,1888–1925

R1/22 M1/26

PrimarySourceExercise1,Day2;MeetinSpecialCollectionsandUniversityArchives

Day2:GroupPresentationsandDiscussion

DUE:PrimarySourceExercise1Reports

DATE DUE AGENDAWEEK4 U1/27 ReadingDiscussionB:Zesch,TheCaptured

GroupA:Prologue&Chapter1GroupB:Chapters2–3GroupC:Chapter4–5GroupD:Chapters6–7

[distributeTake‐HomeMidterm]

R1/29F1/30

FilmScreening:TheSearchers (1956)Introduction&first90minutes

DUE:ResearchProjectStepOne:ResearchTopicStatement(IncludingFilmSelection)

U2/3 FilmScreening:TheSearchers (1956)final30minutes

Discussion:CritiquingTheSearchersasaPrimaryandSecondarySource

M2/2–F2/6

DiscussionC:Zesch,TheCapturedGroupE:Chapters8–9GroupF:Chapters10–11GroupG:Chapters12–13

TutorialMeetingstoDiscussResearchProjectinLLC120(throughoutWeek5)

U2/10 U2/11

PrimarySourceExercise2,Day1:TheTrialofChanChowMow(RoleAssignment)

Presentation:GamSaan&theUnassimilables:ChineseImmigration,Exclusion&Sinophobia

TrialPreparation&TeamMeetings,Day1

DUE:Take‐HomeMidterm

R2/12 M2/9–F2/13

PrimarySourceExercise2,Day2:TheTrialofChanChowMow

TheTrial&Debrief,Day2

TutorialMeetingstoDiscussResearchProjectinLLC120(throughoutWeek6)

WEEK7 FieldTrip:The“HiddenHistory” TourofUOCampus:TheColonialandDecolonialLandscapenarratedbyKevinandJennifer

U2/17 U2/17 DUE:PrimarySourceExercise2Reports

R2/19 ResearchProject:Independent FieldResearchSession1:SpecialGuest:JenniferO'Neal;MeetinSpecialCollections&UniversityArchives

DATE DUE AGENDAWEEK7

F2/20 F2/20 DUE:ResearchProjectStepTwo:HistoricalQuestion&AnnotatedBibliography

U2/24 ResearchProject: IndependentFieldResearchSession2inKnightLibrary;MeetinKnightLibrary122

R2/26 ResearchProject: IndependentFieldResearchSession3inKnightLibrary;MeetinKnightLibrary122

F2/27 F2/27 DUE:ResearchProjectStepThree:PaperOutline/ConceptMap

WEEK9U3/3

ResearchProject:IndependentFieldResearchSession4inKnightLibrary;MeetinKnightLibrary122

R3/5 ResearchProject:IndependentFieldResearchSession5inKnightLibrary;Meetin

KnightLibrary122

F3/6 F3/6 DUE:ResearchProjectStepFour:AnalysisPaperFirstDraftSubmittedtoPeerEvaluator&Instructor

WEEK10

U3/10 U3/10

ResearchProject:ClassWorkshop &PresentationRehearsalsDUE:ResearchProjectStepFive:PresentationOutline

R3/12 R3/12

ResearchProject:OralPresentations(PARTONE)

DUE:ResearchProjectStepFour:PeerEvaluatorsReturnEditedDraftstoPartners

WEEK11 FINALS

M3/16 12:30PMFINALTIME:ResearchProject:OralPresentations(PARTTWO)

R3/19 R3/19 DUE:ResearchProjectStepSeven:FinalPapers