Post on 22-May-2020
transcript
Determinants of Female Labour Force Participation in Jordan
Alma Boustati
UNU‐WIDER
SOAS
Objective• To place the question in its historic, economic, and cultural context
• To survey competing theories and methodologies.
• To present an integrated approach to answering the question.
Content• Overview of Jordan & the Paradox of Female Labour Force Participation
• Economic Theory• Methodology
• Qualitative• Descriptive• Multivariate
• Conclusion and moving forward
Jordan: an Overview
• Small lower middle income country with an open economy.
• Vulnerable to oil price fluctuations but NOT resource rich.
• Agriculture is 4.2% of GDP. Urban population is 84% of the country.
• The services is 66.2% of GDP and manufacturing is apparel and pharmaceuticals.
• The majority are Muslims and half the population is of Palestinian origins.
• Syrian refugees make up 20% of the Jordanian population (recent).
Female labour force participation in Jordan is the second lowest in the world…
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+)
Jordan Lower middle income Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)
Source: World Development Indicators
Closer inspection shows declining female labour force participation rate and low male labour force participation rates(age 15+)
12.8%16.2% 16.0% 16.7% 16.6% 16.5% 15.8% 14.4% 13.1%
63.8%66.0% 65.6% 66.3% 65.1% 64.7% 63.4% 62.0% 60.7%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Female Male Source: Employment and Unemployment Survey, DoS2006‐2014
Women are doing better than men when it comes to education…
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
School enrollment, tertiary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)
Jordan
Lower middle income
Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
School enrollment, primary and secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)
Jordan
Lower middle income
Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)
Gender equality
Source: World Development Indicators
…and there has been important gains in women’s health and a decline in fertility rates
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Fertility Rates (Births per Woman)
Jordan
Lower middle income
Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births)
Jordan
Lower middle income
Middle East & North Africa (excluding high income)
Source: World Development Indicators
Economic theory predicts the following:
Long (1958) – Mincer (1962) – Becker (1965):
• Gains in productivity and increase in wages means the opportunity cost of “household production” increases.
• Fertility rates decline &“human capital investment” increases for women
Female labour force participation rate increase
…so what happened in Jordan?
The most invoked reason is “conservative social norms” stemming form Islam or Arab culture:
• Identity Economics (Akerlof and Kranton 2000) is used by incorporating an identity term in the utility function of a woman. (For MENA: Chamlou et al. 2011; Hayo and Caris 2013…)
• Empirically, identity is captured by subjective questions on religiosity, “traditional identity” & gender roles.
• Policy recommendations keep calling back to more education for women.
BUT it’s a rather simplistic, one‐dimensional approach• Endogeneity: Conservative social norms –> female labour force participation
But also female labour force participation –> Conservative social norms
• Mechanism: FLFP = f(education, conservative social norms)But alsoConservative social norms= f(education)And…Education= f(conservative social norms)
• Coefficient: Explains only 2%‐5% of variation and dwarfed by other, more mainstream factors.
• Identification: Biases in subjective questions.
Of course conservative social norms matter … but a more nuanced approach is required.• The transformation of the “one breadwinner family” is a recent phenomenon• What economic factors allow it to persist? • What economic factors allow it to changes?
• Demand‐side factors & supply‐side factors matter• the initial conditions prior to structural change matters (Bosserup 1970)• So does the path taken to industrialization (Goldin 1995)
=> Socio‐cultural factors are endogenous to the process of development. Examples for MENA:
• Breadwinner Family: Oil revenues => high wages => "one‐breadwinner family” remains sustainable. (Karshenas 1997)
• Dutch Disease: Oil revenues => exchange rate too high => export/labour‐intensive industries that “typically employ women” stopped growing. (Assaad 2005 – on Egypt)
MethodologyFollowing Ilkkaracan’s (2012) in Turkey
• Descriptive• Economic structure, evolution & FLFPR• The cultural context
• Bivariate• Cross‐sectional data to look at the ”stoke” (EUS)• Retrospective data to look at the ”flow” (JLMPS)
• Multivariate• Using EUS: ”Classic” logit regression of female labour force participation• Independent variables include personal and household characteristics
1960s – 1970s: Import Substitution Industrialization StrategyOil revenue => maintenance of high family wageExpansion of public sector => employment opportunities for educated women Foreign female labour ‐ low demand for less‐educated Jordanian women. (Moghadam 2005)
1980s – 1990s: “Economic Reform”Oil price crash and Gulf War Curtailment of public sector => negative impact on job opportunities for educated female labour. (Assaad
2014)
“Implicit policy of discouraging female employment” (Moghadem 1998; Amawi 2000)
Increase demand for foreign female labour–but why?(Frantz 2008).
2000s: Export Oriented Industrialization Strategy Structural adjustment period => high economic growth BUT high unemployment rates.
(to be continued)
Economic Structure and Evolution in Jordan
The cultural context: “patriarchal social contract”• Men’s economic responsibility is explicitly stated in the law.
• “Rights of men to support their families” during ISI (Olmsted 2005)
• Social security/safety nets is contingent on employment => most women are excluded (except through their male next‐of‐kin) (Olmsted 2005).
• Jordan ratified CEDAW (World Bank 2013) but there are still some discriminatory articles in the labour: • Wife to get permission from husband to work.• Women excluded from some industries/time shifts.
• In 2010, 1 in 3 women in Jordan has ever worked• Low FLFPR is as much a retention issue as it is a participation issue. • It also means that “rejection of women in the public sphere” isn’t necessarily a problem.
Quantitative Analysis: Scope and Limitations
• EUS (2006‐2014) & JLMPS (2010) • Representative household surveys• EUS is a pooled cross‐section data.• JLMPS is unique because of retrospective questions.
• FLFPR does NOT change in Jordan even after accounting for informality and agriculture (Flynn 1999; Assaad 2012).
• Underestimation of the number of non‐Jordanians because these are household‐based surveys.
The low female labour force participation is a problem only for lower‐educated women.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
None Primary Secondary Post‐secondary University Postgrad
Female Labour Force Participation Rate by Educational Attainment
2007
2010
2014
Source: Employment and Unemployment Survey, DoS2006‐2014
The “retention issue” is the result of women dropping out upon marriage and not coming back
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
‐10 ‐8 ‐6 ‐4 ‐2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Percen
tage of W
omen
Who
Ever W
orked
Year Since Marriage
Change in Labour Force Status of Women by Year Since Marriage
in LF ‐> not in LF Not in LF ‐> in LF in LF ‐> in LF
women who drop out of the labour force the year they get married
Very small return to the workforce after marriage.
Source: Jordan Labour Market Panel Survey 2010
The unemployment rate of women is twice that of men and the problem of discouraged workers predominantly affect women
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Rate of U
nemployment
Men Discouraged Men Women Discouraged Women
Source: Employment and Unemployment Survey, DoS2006‐2014
Unemployment is highest among university graduates and the situation is especially bad for women with university degrees.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
None Primary Secondary Post‐secondary University Postgrad Total
Unemployment rate in 2014
Men Women Source: Employment and Unemployment Survey, DoS2006‐2014
Average hours worked per week are extremely high for non‐Jordanian women, exceeding the maximum amount of HpW of work allowed by the law.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
None Primary Secondary Post‐Secondary University Postgraduate
Average Working Hours per Week for Women by Education and Nationality
non‐Jordanians Jordanians
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
None Primary Secondary Post‐Secondary University Postgraduate
Average Working Hours per Week for Men by Education and Nationality
non‐Jordanian Jordanian
Maximum hours of work per week (48)
Source: Employment and Unemployment Survey, DoS2006‐2014
Lessons to apply to the Multivariate Analysis• Disaggregating the analysis by educational attainment. • Accounting for family structure beyond married and single.• Analyzing the situation of female foreign workers in Jordan.• Acknowledging the role of demand‐side factors and opportunity structures.
Determinant of women’s labour force participation: EUS logit regression results (marginal effects)
Controls include: age, age squared, urban/rural, whether the woman is the head of her household, and the educational attainment of the household head
VARIABLES 2011 2014
Married ‐0.0793*** ‐0.0725***(0.00309) (0.00304)
No education ‐0.00138 0.00504(0.00505) (0.00535)
Secondary 0.0173*** 0.00709*(0.00358) (0.00405)
Post‐secondary 0.168*** 0.162***(0.00295) (0.00302)
University or higher 0.255*** 0.233***(0.00238) (0.00233)
Presence of Children under 4 years old ‐0.0299*** ‐0.0235***
(0.00271) (0.00268)
Presence of Children between 5 & 11 ‐0.0233*** ‐0.0187***
(0.00229) (0.00225)
Household head is unemployed 0.0159** ‐0.00328(0.00625) (0.00721)
Non‐ Jordanian 0.133*** 0.0779***(0.00452) (0.00415)
Education is the most important determinant of participation
Marriage is a more important deterrent than the presence of children
None Primary Secondary UniversityVARIABLES 2011 2014 2011 2014 2011 2014 2011 2014
Married ‐0.00210 ‐0.00181 ‐0.0509*** ‐0.0277*** ‐0.0540*** ‐0.0434*** ‐0.189*** ‐0.272***(0.00368) (0.00338) (0.00329) (0.00283) (0.00667) (0.00634) (0.0148) (0.0148)
Presence of Children under 4 years old ‐0.0195*** ‐0.0167*** ‐0.0238*** ‐0.0257*** ‐0.0190*** 0.00537 ‐0.0478*** ‐0.0262*
(0.00392) (0.00403) (0.00305) (0.00290) (0.00591) (0.00517) (0.0132) (0.0134)
Presence of Children between 5 & 11 ‐0.00404 ‐0.0130*** ‐0.0220*** ‐0.0301*** ‐0.0407*** ‐0.0102** 0.0203* 0.0376***
(0.00334) (0.00321) (0.00262) (0.00242) (0.00505) (0.00457) (0.0112) (0.0112)Household head is unemployed 0.0159** ‐0.00335 0.00770 ‐0.00805 0.0276** ‐0.0146 0.0390 0.133***
(0.00799) (0.00862) (0.00630) (0.00661) (0.0116) (0.0159) (0.0349) (0.0423)Non‐ Jordanian 0.0582*** 0.0385*** 0.105*** 0.0552*** 0.0474*** 0.00142 ‐0.318*** ‐0.340***
(0.00335) (0.00312) (0.00352) (0.00276) (0.0103) (0.0104) (0.0348) (0.0364)
Determinant of women’s labour force participation: EUS logit regression results (marginal effects)
Marriage has a stronger negative effect for educated women and its increasing
low‐paid foreign female workers are still present
There is an added‐worker effect for educated women
Controls include: age, age squared, urban/rural, whether the woman is the head of her household, and the educational attainment of the household head
Conclusions• Education is the most important determinant of whether a woman will participate. Possible mechanisms include
• Substitution effect.• Access to work opportunities.• “Reservation working conditions”. (Assaad 2015)
• Marriage is a much more important deterrent of labour force participation than children • “Patriarchal contract” matters more than “burden of care”.• Educated women do NOT necessarily change conservative perception towards gender roles.
• Being non‐Jordanian positively affects participation at the lower educational levels • The presence of low‐paid foreign female workers is still an important factor (though not completely captured by the survey) • Foreign female workers may be working under conditions that are not accepted by Jordanian women.• Or they are preferred by the employer (lower minimum wage and no max hours)
• The “added worker effect” is much larger for educated women either because • They’re more likely to find employment opportunities • Or they earn a higher wage.