Diapositiva 1 - ENCePP · Title: Diapositiva 1 Author: Joan-Ramon Created Date: 11/30/2015 10:56:45...

Post on 25-Aug-2020

6 views 0 download

transcript

2012 – EMA Safety Alerts

• QT Prolongation with citalopram >40 mg daily, October 2011

• QT Prolongation with escitalopram >20 mg daily in the

elderly, December 2011

• Aliskiren, February 2012

• Maximum recommended dose :

< 65 years-old – 40 mg per day

≥ 65 years-old – 20 mg per day

• Contraindicated if concomitant use of other drugs

prolonging the QT interval

• Maximum recommended dose in ≥ 65 years-old:

20 mg per day

• Contraindicated if concomitant use of other drugs

prolonging the QT interval

(Based on a study in healthy volunteers)

Catalan Institute of Health (CIH)

Catalan Institute of Health (CIH)

• > 5.9 million citizens covered (85% of PHC)

• 288 PHC teams

• 8 hospitals

• 132 × 106 prescriptions

• 1,585 M€ (PHC, 1,325 M€, hospitals: 260 M€)

Dispensed prescriptions, Spain, 1990-2015

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Polymedication, May 2015

2014:

> 99% PHC and

60% hospitals

Electronic prescribing

ICS Strategy – Healthy medicines prescribing

Principles:

• Healthy, safe, and efficient prescribing

• Prescribers participation and co-responsibility

Tools

• Institutional support to clinicians

• MBO and management agreements

• Use of communication systems and ICTs

• Clinical management of the introduction of new

medicines

Tools

• Institutional support to clinicians

• MBO and management agreements

• Use of communication systems and ICTs

• Clinical management of the introduction of new

medicines

Institutional support to clinicians

• ICS’ Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Support tools for electronic prescribing

• Bulletin of the Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Safety Alerts

• Formulary

• Medicines selection

• Guidelines and recommendations

• Information & communication

• Safe prescribing

• Proactive pharmacovigilance priorities

• Forum for debate and clinicians’ participation

18

ICS Pharmacotherapy Committee

Institutional support to clinicians

• ICS’ Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Support tools for electronic prescribing

• Bulletin of the Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Safety Alerts

Support tools for electronic prescribing

Recommendations for chronic conditions @Clinical guidelines

Recommendations for acute conditions @Formulary

Automatic warnings to prevent ADRs and medication errors

PREFASEG

Tool to review medicines prescribed to selected patients with recommendations to manage changes

Self Audit

Support tools for electronic prescribing

Recommendations for chronic conditions @Clinical guidelines

Recommendations for acute conditions @Formulary

Automatic warnings to prevent ADRs and medication errors

PREFASEG

Tool to review medicines prescribed to selected patients with recommendations to manage changes

Self Audit

Therapeutic recommendations tailored to the patients’

clinical characteristics

N of patients

Initial Reviewed

Self Audit

Changed

Self Audit Remaining

Bisphosphonates > 5 years 22,087 6,094 4,288 16,256

Antialzheimer > 2 years 13,580 6,003 1,051 10,108

Double antiplatelet > 12 mo 6,552 5,070 1,464 5,199

Not recommended drugs 33,379 29,634 3,263 28,310

Summary Self-Audit activity, 2012

Institutional support to clinicians

• ICS’ Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Support tools for electronic prescribing

• Bulletin of the Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Safety Alerts

Institutional support to clinicians

• ICS’ Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Support tools for electronic prescribing

• Bulletin of the Pharmacotherapy Committee

• Safety Alerts

Tools

• Institutional support to clinicians

• MBO and management agreements

• Use of communication systems and ICTs

• Clinical management of the introduction of new

medicines

Contract with CHS Indicators 5%

Sustainbility

Economic balance 15%

Maximal Authorised Expenditure 10%

Results of Health Care

activity and Quality

Health Care Quality Standard (HCQS) 25%

Prescribing Quality Standard (PQS) 15%

Safe drug prescribing 10%

PHC Team Organization 2,5%

Diagnosis Quality Standard 7,5%

Quality Management Patient safety 10%

>75% of PHC physicians reach more than 50% of the target in

Management by Objectives related to this indicator

Tools

• Institutional support to clinicians

• MBO and management agreements

• Use of communication systems and ICTs

• Clinical management of the introduction of new

medicines

Tools

• Institutional support to clinicians

• MBO and management agreements

• Use of communication systems and ICTs

• Clinical management of the introduction of new

medicines

EMA/AEMPS alerts in the e-CAP:

citalopram & escitalopram

Març '12

Abril Maig Juny Julio

l Agost

Sete Octu

b Novem

Desem

Gener '13

Febrer

Març Abril Maig Juny Julio

l Agost

Setem

Octub

Novem

Desem

CITALOPRAM 5848 5836 5141 4854 4637 4526 4216 4134 3403 2634 2607 2542 2385 2356 2204 2076 1965 1900 1765 1529 1329 1006

ESCITALOPRAM 7799 7791 6920 6635 6328 6167 5820 5518 4620 3529 3486 3467 3251 3130 2952 2798 2701 2567 2423 2071 1740 1350

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000 13,647

2,656

Març '12

Abril Maig Juny Juliol Agos

t Sete

Octub

Novem

Desem

Gener '13

Febrer

Març Abril Maig Juny Juliol Agos

t Sete

m Octu

b Nove

m Dese

m

ALISKIREN 1023 1019 377 298 236 223 202 181 143 102 100 91 81 68 58 48 46 41 38 34 29 24

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

EMA/AEMPS alerts in the e-CAP:

aliskiren

How many prescribers know that safety alerts for

these (and other) medicines have been issued?

How many prescribers know that safety alerts exist?

How many prescribers know about pharmacovigilance

systems?

How many prescribers know about EMA and national

agencies regulatory activities?

Conclusions

• Safety Alerts are frequently relevant to patients’

safety in PHC

• Pharmacovigilance National and Regional Centres

should closely collaborate with health care

organizations

• Health care provider organizations should promote

a healthy use of medicines – they are responsible

for patients’ safety

Conclusions

• In our experience dissemination of three Safety

Alerts was followed by a deep decrease of the

alerted practices

• Dissemination of Safety Alerts should be tailored

to local conditions: prevalence of use, opportunity,

etc.

Conclusions

• In our experience dissemination of Safety Alerts

was part of a general strategy for patients’ safety

promotion, including financial incentives

• Which role for Regional Pharmacovigilance

Centres?

Patients’ safety Medicines safety

Thank you for your attention

jrl@icf.uab.cat

www.icf.uab.es