Digital Rhetoric Critical Race Theory and Cyberspace J. Santoy Spring 2008.

Post on 14-Jan-2016

215 views 0 download

transcript

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Critical Race Theory andCyberspace

J. SantoySpring 2008

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 2

D

igit

al R

heto

ric Theoretical

Frameworks Critical Race TheoryTheories of Online

Space

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 3

6 tenets of CRT• Racism is endemic • Questions objectivity and

neutrality• Insists on contextual and

historical analysis • Acknowledges experience of POC • Interdisciplinary • Seeks to change physical

conditions

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 4

Saco’s Theories

of space created via

the use of digital technologies

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 5

Perceived

Conceived

Lived

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 6

PerceivedRealm of physical

experience produced and reproduced

through spatial practices and

movement

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 7

ConceivedRealm of mental

experience constructed as

representations of spaceSeek to order

movement

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 8

LivedPassively experienced; realm

of dominated spaces of

representationPossibility for Resistance and Rearticulation

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 9

Critical Race Theory

Theories of Online Space

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 10

D

igit

al R

heto

ric Mainstream

Scholarship

Race Digital

Technologies

Digital DivideAccess

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 11

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Digital Divide

No participation by POC in

Digital Rhetoricwithout access

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 12

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

EBSCO

1477

Digital Divide

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 13

D

igit

al R

heto

ric Academic Search

PremierDD 1477 Economics 252 Gender

60Race 50 Culture 48

430428176

U. S.

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 14

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Who has access?

What type?

What factors influence access?

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 15

D

igit

al R

heto

ric What are useful

strategies and programs

toprovide more

access?

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 16

D

igit

al R

heto

ric Concentrate

on Power dynamics

Computer Tech = Power

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 17

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Computer Tech = Power

Who has power?Who is being left out of the power

structure?How? What can we

do about it?

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 18

Power Dynamics

Race

Online Spaces

will work to keep

out of

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 19

Useful frame

Saco’s Theories

PerceivedConceived

Lived

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 20

Perceived spaces created via spatial

practices

Conceived spaces constructed as representations

Lived spaces dominated spaces of

representation

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 21

CRT #1Racism is endemic. Racism is occurring

onlineWhat does

examination of space(s) reveal?

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 22

Perceivedwhat interaction is

happening

understudiedRhetoric of DD

focuses on access not examining those who are

interacting

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 23

ConceivedAccess affects how digital technologies are conceived; the

perspective and experiences of POC not included during

design

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 24

LivedThe ongoing cost of

technological access makes it out

of reach for POC

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 25

lived

perceived

conceived

People of

color

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 26

CRT #2

No objectivity or neutrality.

How is design of space(s) not objective?

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 27

Conceivedrepresentation

constructed does not help POC when they

do get accessthe perspective and experiences of POC not included during

design

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 28

D

igit

al R

heto

ric Use of Digital

Technologies by POC

Already restricted

Design limits the possibilities for

racial representation

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 29

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Design limitations

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 30

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Only acknowledges certain identity

constructions.

Design functions to demonstrate

what is privileged

and what is not deemed important.

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 31

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

Check off the box

blackplanet.commigente.com

asian.com

which doesn’t acknowledge the

complex racial and ethnic identities

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 32

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

lived

conceived

conceived

People of

color

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 33

LivedHow are lived

spaces affected?Despite inroads in

access no significant progress

has been made

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 34

CRT #4

Acknowledge experience of POC. How can the

perceived and conceived spaces

do this?

S

pace in

C

yb

ers

pace

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 35

lived

Resistance

POC

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 36

a. Education / language / literacyb. Social

i. Networksii. Connections

c. Economici. money ii. material possessionsiii. Property

Digital Divide & rhetoric of deficiency

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 37

perceived

Have

Education

LiteracyConnecti

onsMoney

Deficient

NO EducationLiteracy

NetworksMoney

Digital Divide & Cultural Capital

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 38

Deficiency modelTeach them

functional literacy skills derived from

dominant definitions of

digital literacy.

C

riti

cal R

ace

Th

eory

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 39

CRT #6Seek improvement

of material conditions. How can our

research not support hegemony

and resist deficiency model ?

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 40

D

igit

al R

heto

ric

As POC gain accessand

Use digital technologies

Study rhetorical strategies used and to what ends they

are used

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 41

New Framework for Cultural Capital

•Aspirational

•Linguistic•Familial

•Navigational

•Social•Resistant

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 42

New Framework• Aspirational maintains hopes

and dreams for the future; despite low outcomes; high expectations

• Linguistic• Familial• Navigational• Social• Resistant

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 43

• Aspirational• Linguistic intellectual and social

skills attained through communication, experience in more than one language or style

• Familial• Navigational• Social• Resistant

New Framework

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 44

• Aspirational• Linguistic• Familial cultural knowledge nurtured

among family carry sense of common history; commitment to community well being, concept of family more broad

• Navigational• Social• Resistant

New Framework

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 45

New Framework• Aspirational• Linguistic• Familial• Navigational skill of maneuvering

through social institutions not created with people of color in mind; social and phychological; critical navigational skills to maneuver though structure of inequity; acknowledges individual agency within institutional constraints and connects to social networks

• Social• Resistant

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 46

New Framework• Aspirational• Linguistic• Familial• Navigational• Social: Networks of people and

community resources; provide emotional and instrumental support to navigate through society’s institutions

• Resistant

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 47

New Framework• Aspirational• Linguistic• Familial• Navigational• Social• Resistant--Knowledges and skills

fostered through oppositional behavior that challenge inequity; legacy of resistance to subordination

C

ult

ura

l W

ealt

h

Spring 2008 J. Santoy 48

Further Study

• Education– Language, literacy

• Social – Networks

• Economicmoney material possessionsProperty

• Aspirational• Linguistic• Familial• Navigational• Social• Resistant