Post on 09-Mar-2019
transcript
Research Collection
Doctoral Thesis
Dirty water and diseasepesticide mediated interactions between Daphnia and theirparasites
Author(s): Buser, Claudia Carolina
Publication Date: 2011
Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006713645
Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For moreinformation please consult the Terms of use.
ETH Library
DISS. ETH NO. 19964
Dirty water and disease: Pesticide mediated interactions between Daphnia
and their parasites
A dissertation submitted to
ETH ZURICH
for the degree of
Doctor of Sciences
presented by
CLAUDIA CAROLINA BUSER Master of Science in Biology, University of Zürich
born 05.05.1982
citizen of Basel (BS)
accepted on the recommendation of
PD Dr. Piet Spaak
Prof. Dr. Paul Schmid-Hempel
Dr. Christoph Haag
2011
Contents
Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 1 .................................................................................................................................... 5
Introduction and outline of the thesis ..................................................................................... 5
Chapter 2 .................................................................................................................................. 19
Variation within and between species cannot be ignored in toxicity tests ........................... 19
Chapter 3 .................................................................................................................................. 31
Combined exposure to parasites and pesticides causes increased mortality in the water
flea Daphnia ......................................................................................................................... 31
Chapter 4 .................................................................................................................................. 43
Disease and pollution alter Daphnia community structure .................................................. 43
Chapter 5 .................................................................................................................................. 63
Evolutionary and environmental effects of pesticide exposure on parasite fitness and
virulence ................................................................................................................................ 63
Chapter 6 .................................................................................................................................. 77
Environment-dependent virulence affects disease spread in host populations ..................... 77
Chapter 7 .................................................................................................................................. 87
Concluding remarks and recommendations for future research ........................................... 87
Curriculum vitae ....................................................................................................................... 97
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. 103
1
Summary
Communities in the wild are subject to a multitude of abiotic and biotic stressors. In turn,
environmental stressors acting on the individual level can further influence population and
community structure. In my doctoral research, I studied the effect of parasites and pesticides
on host individuals as well as on hosts in experimental communities. I used several Daphnia
(water flea) taxa and their endoparasites, as well as the pesticide diazinon. Chapter 1
introduces these animals and the pesticide, and additionally includes a short review about
host-parasite-environment interactions.
Pesticides are one of the most ubiquitous pollutants in water bodies. Although the effects of
chemical contamination can permeate whole ecosystems, many toxicological studies are
conducted using a single clone of one species. Chapter 2 shows variation in mortality rates
towards the exposure of the common pesticide diazinon within and between three different
Daphnia species (D. magna, D. pulicaria and D. galeata). Not taking that variation into
account by using only one clone for assessing the hazardous potential of a chemical might
lead to an underestimation of risk towards other, more sensitive clones in the community.
In Chapter 3, I investigated the combined influence of disease and chemical pollution on host
fitness. I exposed D. magna clones to the parasite Pasteuria ramosa and the pesticide
diazinon. The clones were hatched from different sediment layers from a pond in Belgium
where they co-occur with different densities of this parasite. Although I did not observe
visible signs of infection, D. magna clones had reduced survival when simultaneously
exposed to both parasites and chemical pollution. I did not find that host clones were adapted
to pesticides or parasites over time.
Effects of parasites and/or pesticides on single individuals may shape the structure and
dynamic of the whole community. However, extrapolation of experimental results from tests
on single individuals to a community level may not always be accurate given that, for
example, competition between individuals is not considered. In Chapter 4, I followed
changes in experimental Daphnia communities after exposure to the fungal parasite
Metschnikowia sp. and/or the pesticide diazinon. On a community level, including
competition within and among taxa, dynamics were altered by parasite and pesticide
exposure. One taxon went extinct under parasite and combined stress treatments, and I also
show clonal/taxon sensitivity towards the pesticide. Furthermore, the density of all adult
Summary
2
females was significantly reduced in the parasite treatment, but not in the pesticide treatment.
In general, the parasite exposure inserted stronger selection pressure than the pesticides.
Not only hosts are affected by pollutants. Parasites can be affected as well. Parasite virulence
can be strongly dependent on host condition and can be mediated by environmental variation.
In Chapter 5 the environmental and evolutionary effects of diazinon on parasite fitness and
virulence were tested. Parasites exposed for several generations to the pesticide evolved
towards higher fitness and lower virulence, a finding that could have a significant impact on
disease dynamics.
Using epidemiological models, I examined the impact of environment-dependent virulence on
parasite virulence and disease spread in Chapter 6. The results suggest that the underlying
relationship between virulence and host environment can drastically affect whether disease
spreads as well as the intensity of the epidemic.
In summary, the studies I conducted for my doctoral thesis show that two forms of
environmental stress, parasites and pesticides, can mediate the fitness of single individuals,
affect the structure and evolution of communities, and determine whether disease can spread.
Parasites act together with ecologically-relevant levels of pesticide pollution to impact host
individuals and communities, but the strength of the combine effects highly depends on host
genotype and the organismal level (i.e., individual, community) considered. Moreover,
pesticides not only reduce host fitness and alter community structure, but also shape the
evolution of parasites towards higher fitness and lower virulence. These outcomes may affect
the theoretical spread of disease in environments of varying quality. I discuss the implications
of these findings, as well as future research directions in Chapter 7.
3
Zusammenfassung
Populationen in natürlichen Habitaten sind häufig einer Vielzahl von abiotischen und
biotischen Stressoren ausgesetzt. Diese Umweltstressoren, agierend auf einzelne Individuen,
können Auswirkungen auf die Struktur und Dynamik von Populationen und Gemeinschaften
haben. Während meinem Doktorat habe ich den Effekt solcher Umweltstressoren, in Form
von Parasiten und Pestiziden, auf einzelne Wirte als auch auf experimentelle
Wirtsgemeinschaften untersucht. Als Modelsystem habe ich verschiedene Daphnien Arten
und ihren Endoparasiten sowie das Pestizid Diazinon benutzt. Dieses Modelsystem wird
zusammen mit Grundlagentheorie zum Thema Wirt-Parasiten Interaktion und deren Effekt
auf die Umwelt in Kapitel 1 beleuchtet.
Pestizide sind häufig vorkommende Chemikalien, welche unsere Gewässer verschmutzen.
Auch wenn Giftstoffe ganze Ökosysteme verändern können, werden toxikologische Studien
häufig nur mit einem Klon einer Art durchgeführt. Kapitel 2 zeigt, dass Variation in der
durch das Pestizid Diazinon verursachten Mortalität zwischen und innerhalb verschiedener
Daphnien Arten vorhanden ist. Wird diese Variation nicht berücksichtigt, kann dies zu einer
Fehleinschätzung der Gefährlichkeit des Schadstoffes für natürliche Gemeinschaften führen.
Kapitel 3 beschreibt meine Studie über den kombinierten Effekt von Parasiten und Pestizid
auf die Fitness des Wirtes. Dafür habe ich D. magna Klone dem Parasit Pasteuria ramosa und
dem Pestizid Diazinon ausgesetzt. Die D. magna Klone stammen aus verschiedenen
Sedimentschichten eines Weihers in Belgien. Diese Schichten weisen eine unterschiedliche
Dichte der Parasitensporen auf. Eine visuelle Infektion konnte anhand des Experimentes nicht
festgestellt werden. D. magna Klone zeigten aber bei simultaner Exponiertheit von Krankheit
und Umweltstressor eine Reduktion der Überlebensrate. Keine Adaption, weder an den
Parasit noch an das Pestizid, konnte über die Zeit festgestellt werden.
Parasitäre Effekte und/oder solche von Pestiziden auf einzelne Individuen können die Struktur
und Dynamik einer ganzen Gemeinschaft formen. Eine Hochrechnung von Resultaten, welche
auf Tests mit einzelnen Individuen basieren, auf Populationsebene reflektiert die reale
Situation in einer Gemeinschaft nicht ganzheitlich. Unter anderem wird zum Beispiel die
Konkurrenz innerhalb und zwischen den Individuen nicht in Betracht gezogen. In dem im
Kapitel 4 beschriebenen Experiment habe ich die Änderung von experimentellen Daphnien-
Gemeinschaften verfolgt, nachdem sie dem Pilzparasit Metschnikowia sp. und/oder dem
Zusammenfassung
4
Pestizid Diazinon exponiert worden waren. In einer Gemeinschaft und somit unter Einbezug
von inner- und zwischenartlicher Konkurrenz wurde die Dynamik durch den Parasit sowie
durch das Pestizid geändert. Dabei verschwand eine Art bei Behandlung mit Parasiten sowie
auch mit Parasiten/Pestizid komplett. Ebenfalls konnte ich bei einer Art eine erhöhte
Sensitivität gegenüber dem Pestizid feststellen. Ausserdem reduzierte der Parasit, jedoch nicht
das Pestizid, die Dichte von allen erwachsenen Weibchen signifikant. Unter diesen
experimentellen Bedingungen hatte der Parasit einen stärkeren Selektionsdruck auf die
Daphnien-Gemeinschaft ausgeübt als das Pestizid.
Nicht nur die Wirte, auch deren Parasiten können von chemischen Verschmutzungen
beeinträchtigt sein. Die Virulenz des Parasiten ist von der Wirtkondition abhängig, kann aber
auch von Umweltveränderungen beeinflusst werden. In Kapitel 5 wurden die evolutionären
und ökologischen Effekte von Diazinon auf die Fitness und Virulenz des Parasiten getestet.
Parasiten, welche für einige Generationen dem Pestizid ausgesetzt waren, entwickelten eine
höhere Fitness und eine niedrigere Virulenz. Eine Entdeckung, welche eine signifikante
Auswirkung auf die Krankheitsdynamik haben kann.
Mit Hilfe eines epidemiologischen Modells habe ich in Kapitel 6 die Auswirkung von
verschiedenen Umwelt-Virulenz Beziehungen auf die Krankheitsverbreitung untersucht. Die
Resultate deuten darauf hin, dass die Verbreitung der Krankheit in unterschiedlichen
Umweltqualitäten drastisch von der zugrunde liegenden Umwelt-Virulenz-Beziehung
beeinflusst wird.
Zusammenfassend zeigen die Studien in meiner Dissertation, dass zwei Formen von
Umweltstressoren - Parasiten und Pestizid - die Fitness von einzelnen Individuen sowie die
Struktur und Evolution von Gemeinschaften beeinflussen und auch bestimmen, ob sich die
Krankheit verbreiten kann. Die Kombination von Parasiten und ökologisch-relevanten
Pestizidkonzentrationen haben einen Einfluss auf Wirt-Individuen und -Gemeinschaften. Die
Stärke des kombinierten Effektes hängt stark vom Wirtsgenotyp und dem Organismuslevel
(einzelne Individuen oder Gemeinschaften) ab. Desweiteres hat das Pestizid nicht nur die
Wirtfitness und die Gemeinschaftsstrukturen verändert, sondern formt auch die Evolution von
Parasiten in Richtung höhere Fitness und schwächere Virulenz. Diese Ergebnisse können die
potentielle Verbreitung von Krankheiten in verschiedenen Umweltqualitäten beeinflussen. Ich
diskutiere die Auswirkungen dieser Resultate sowie auch mögliche zukünftige
Forschungsprojekte in Kapitel 7.
5
Chapter 1
Introduction and outline of the thesis
Claudia C. Buser
Introduction Chapter 1
6
Parasites in ecosystems
Parasites are ubiquitous and play an important role in host ecology and evolution. For
example, parasites are a driving factor for the maintenance of sexual reproduction (Jaenike
1978; Hamilton 1980; Bell 1982; Hamilton et al. 1990), and they can alter the genetic
structure of their host populations (Sasaki 2000) and structure of host communities (Anderson
& May 1979, 1982; Hudson & Greenman 1998; Boots & Sasaki 2003). Host-parasite
interactions may result in continuous coevolutionary changes (Hamilton 1980), in which
parasites evolve new adaptations to infect and hosts evolve new adaptations to resist parasites,
also known as the Red Queen hypothesis (van Valen 1977; Jaenike 1978; Bell 1982). This
type of coevolution can result in host and parasite genotypes oscillating in frequency over
time (Jaenike 1978; Hamilton 1980). Such oscillatory dynamics were observed in for example
snails or Daphnia (Dybdahl & Lively 1998; Decaestecker et al. 2007; Jokela et al. 2009;
Koskella & Lively 2009). Although host and parasites genotypes are major determinants of
infection success (Lambrechts et al. 2006), these host-parasite interactions can be influenced
by environmental conditions (Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009), having impact
on populations and even whole ecosystems (Fig. 1).
Environment and host-parasite interactions
As most parasites cannot live outside their host for extended periods, parasite success is
strongly linked with host ecology and evolution. Consequently, if environmental factors affect
host fitness, they likely also highly impact on parasite fitness. Host × parasite × environment
interactions can mediate parasite prevalence, disease dynamics and, ultimately affect
populations and whole ecosystems (Fig. 1).
Environmental stress can make hosts more susceptible to parasites. Abiotic and biotic factors
can affect immune defence. In general, the immune system is energetically costly to maintain
and therefore, environmental stress, such as poor feeding conditions (Schmid-Hempel 2005)
or pollution (McDowell et al. 1999), can lead to a weaker immune system. This enables
parasites to infect more easily. Increased infectivity when hosts experience environmental
stress has been observed in several host-parasite systems: pesticide exposures increases
infectivity in oysters (Chu & Hale 1994) and amphibians (Rohr et al. 2008) predation
increases infectivity in crustaceans (Yin et al. 2011).
Chapter 1 Introduction
7
Fig. 1: Schematic representation of host-parasite interactions (black arrows), its influence (thinner black arrows)
on disease dynamic and consequently the effects on populations and whole ecosystems (wide grey arrows). The
black dashed arrows denote the feedback of the different levels on host and/or parasite fitness. The environment
can have an influence on everything.
Thus, parasite fitness can increase in a poor host environment due to reduced host immune
function (Sheldon & Verhulst 1996; Moret & Schmid-Hempel 2000). Conversely, not only
hosts, but also parasites can be negatively affected when the host is exposed to environmental
stress, for example, due to reduced resources available for the parasite growth (Pulkkinen &
Ebert 2004; Tschirren et al. 2007; Seppälä et al. 2008; Hall et al. 2009b). Furthermore,
parasites themselves can be killed by the environmental stressor itself due to higher sensitivity
to the stressor (Pietrock & Marcogliese 2003). Also, parasite virulence has been repeatedly
shown to be influenced by environmental variation in a variety of animal-parasite systems
(empirical examples in Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009). The relationship
between virulence and environmental quality can take many forms (see examples in Thomas
& Blanford 2003). Often, mortality of infected hosts is increased in bad environments, for
example by starvation (Jokela et al. 1999; Ferguson & Read 2002; Brown et al. 2003; Tseng
2004; Jokela et al. 2005) or exposure to pesticides (Coors et al. 2008; Coors & De Meester
2011), microorganism-enriched water (Cornet & Sorci 2010) and high temperatures (Mitchell
Introduction Chapter 1
8
& Read 2005). Less frequently reported, parasites can induce higher host mortality when
environmental conditions are good (e.g., Vale et al. 2011).
Parasite transmission can be affected by environmental stressors too. Environmental stress
can increase (e.g., Murray et al. 1998) or reduce (e.g., Coors & De Meester 2011) the
production of parasite transmission stages, or transmission stages could be sensitive towards
direct exposure (Pietrock & Marcogliese 2003). Furthermore, transmission rate is linked with
host density (e.g., Ebert 1995; Bittner et al. 2002), and therefore environmental stressors
reducing host density could affect parasite transmission.
Transmission rate, host and parasite fitness, host immunocompetence and parasite virulence
all can influence disease occurrence, the timing of epidemics and epidemic intensity (Fig. 1).
Environmental parameters can also spark epidemics (Johnson et al. 2006; Johnson et al.
2009). Temperature and predators, for example, can jointly drive the timing of epidemics
(Hall et al. 2006).
The emergence of disease in fresh water can be imputed to anthropogenic changes (Daszak et
al. 2001). Epidemiological models are increasingly integrating the environment to determine
how local conditions affect spread of diseases (Lafferty & Holt 2003; Hall et al. 2007; Hall et
al. 2009a). As infection disease models suggest that the likelihood and impact of an epidemic
increases with host density (Anderson & May 1978), stressors depressing population density
should reduce the chance of an epidemic. Lafferty and Holt (2003) suggest that stress reduces
density and/or host quality, and therefore transmission rate is lowered. On the other hand, the
spread of disease can be enhanced by improved environmental conditions (Hall et al. 2007).
Over the last few years, studies including the effect of environmental factor on host × parasite
interactions have become more frequent (e.g., Wolinska & King 2009). Nevertheless, there is
still a general need for more empirical studies testing predictions of how environmental stress
influence the different steps in Fig. 1. The study system (host-parasite-environmental stress)
used to answer the aims (see below) of this thesis is presented below.
Host-parasite system and pesticides as environmental stressors
The host Daphnia
The genus Daphnia comprises planktonic crustaceans belonging to the Cladocera (crustacean)
which inhabit freshwater habitats (water bodies from small temporary pools to huge lakes)
throughout the world. Over 100 species are included in the genus. Some species can form
hybrid complexes which co-exist with the parental species in Daphnia communities (e.g.,
Schwenk & Spaak 1995; Keller et al. 2008; Petrusek et al. 2008; Yin et al. 2010).
Chapter 1 Introduction
9
Many Daphnia species have a cyclic parthenogenetic reproduction mode (Fig. 2). Under good
conditions, Daphnia produce clones inside their brood pouch which are released as fully-
developed juveniles. When conditions are deteriorating, most Daphnia clones are able to
switch to sexual reproduction. The sexual eggs must be fertilized by asexually-produced
males. These sexual eggs are encapsulated and protected by an ephippium. They enter into
diapause until environmental clues (e.g., light, warmer temperature) induce hatching.
Otherwise, dormant eggs can accumulate in the sediment. A new field of resurrection ecology
is using dormant eggs as a tool to address ecological, evolutionary and toxicological based
questions.
Fig. 2: Life cycle of a cyclic parthenogenic Daphnia. Drawing by Dita B. Vizoso, Fribourg University (Ebert
2005)
Daphnia is a model organism in ecology, evolutionary biology, and toxicological and
biomedical research. The animal has a cyclic parthenogenic reproduction mode, short
generation time, central role in ecosystems, worldwide distribution, small size, and quickly
responds to environmental changes.
Introduction Chapter 1
10
Daphnia and their parasites used in this thesis
Daphnia species are host of different parasites, carrying a large number of epi- and
endobionts (Green 1974). Most parasites of Daphnia are microparasites, belonging to
bacteria, fungi and microsporidians (Ebert 2005). In my thesis, I worked with two different
Daphnia taxa-parasite systems: a) Daphnia magna and Pasteuria ramosa, b) Daphnia of the
D. longispina hybrid complex (specifically, D. galeata and its hybids
D. galeata × longispina) and Metschnikowia sp..
a) D. magna and P. ramosa
D. magna is found in temporary and permanent ponds. P. ramosa is a bacteria parasitizing
Daphnia (Ebert 2005) and co-occurring with D. magna in the field (e.g., Little & Ebert 2000;
Jansen et al. 2010). This Gram-positive bacterium, belonging to the family of the
Alicyclobacillaceae (e.g., Ebert et al. 1996), is an extracellular parasite infecting the
hemolymph (Metchnikoff 1888). Infected hosts grow large, the body becomes darkish and
non-transparent (Fig. 3), and infected hosts become infertile. P. ramosa is transmitted
horizontally through spores released from dead infected hosts. P. ramosa spores are found in
pond sediments and remain infective for decades (Decaestecker et al. 2004).
Fig. 3: D. magna uninfected (left) and infected (right) with P. ramosa (photo and copyright by Ebert (2005)).
b) D. galeata, the hybrid D. galeata × longispina and Metschnikowia sp.
D. galeata is one of the three parental species (D. cucullata G. O. Sars, 1862, D. galeata
G. O. Sars, 1863 and D. longispina O. F. Müller, 1776) belonging to the D. longispina hybrid
complex (Petrusek et al. 2008). D. galeata × longispina hybrids can co-occur with parental
Chapter 1 Introduction
11
species and dominate Daphnia communities of European lakes (e.g., Keller et al. 2008;
Petrusek et al. 2008; Yin et al. 2010). The yeast parasite Metchnikowia sp. (family
Hemiascomycetes, Wolinska et al. 2009) commonly infects Daphnia populations in Europe
and the United States (Hall 2005; Caceres et al. 2006; Yin et al. 2010; Wolinska et al. 2011).
Needle-like ascospores accumulate in the body cavity and are released and horizontally
transmitted after host death (Green 1974)(Fig. 4). Infected Daphnia have fewer offspring and
a reduced lifespan (Duffy & Hall 2008; Lohr et al. 2010).
Fig. 4: D. galeata uninfected (left) and infected (right) with Metschnikowia sp. (photo and copyright by Yin et
al. (2011)).
The pesticide diazinon and the interaction with Daphnia
Many chemicals find their way into the water (e.g., through surface run-offs from agricultural
fields and urban areas after rain events). Among anthropogenic chemicals, pesticides are
harmful because they were originally designed to kill a variety of target species. Pesticides are
known to affect fitness of individual organisms, as well as to change community and
ecosystem structure from non-target individuals (reviewed in Hanazato 2001; Rohr &
Crumrine 2005). Organophosphosphate pesticides can be regularly detected in the aquatic
environment (Giddings et al. 2000; Strom et al. 2003; Pedersen et al. 2006; Gaworecki et al.
2009; Wittmer et al. 2010). They were introduced as replacements for the persistent
organochlorine pesticides (e.g., DDT), which caused adverse health effects in non-target
species (Woodwell et al. 1967). Organophosphosphate pesticides can have toxic effects on the
immune systems and immune functions of invertebrates, fish and higher vertebrate wildlife
(reviewed in Galloway & Handy 2003). Because of its wide use in agriculture and
Introduction Chapter 1
12
households, the organophosphate diazinon (O,O-diethyl O-[2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-
pyrimidinyl] phosphothionate; Fig. 5; initially produced in 1952 by Ciba-Geigy, later
Novarits and then Syngenta) is among the most used pesticides and is still frequently
measured in aquatic environments. For example, diazinon is found in Switzerland around
Lake Greifensee (e.g., Singer et al. 2010; http://www.umweltschutz.zh.ch; Wittmer et al.
2010) or Greece (Konstantinou et al. 2006). It can be detected in surface waters mainly in the
ng/L range, but also acute concentrations (μg/L range) in short pulses have been recorded
(Wittmer et al. 2010). Exposure to a sub-lethal diazinon concentration causes a delay in
reproduction, a decrease in fecundity and offspring size and higher adult mortality in
Daphnia magna (Sanchez et al. 1998).
Fig. 5: Chemical structure of Diazinon (Structure retrieved from toxipedia.org/display/ toxipedia/Diazinon)
Daphnia, their parasites and pesticide interactions
Pesticides and biotic stressors, like parasites, can interact in the wild. Coors found increased
parasite virulence and/or increased host susceptibility to infections, when exposing D. magna
to the pesticide carbaryl (Coors & De Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Coors et al. 2009;
Coors & De Meester 2011). Moreover, Jansen found that natural Daphnia populations are
able to rapidly evolve resistance towards the pesticide carbaryl, but at the cost of a greater
susceptibility towards the parasite (Jansen et al. 2011a; Jansen et al. 2011b).
Aim of the thesis
This thesis aimed to examine the influence of pesticide pollution on host and parasite fitness,
as well as parasite virulence. It additionally focuses on the effect of multiple stressors on host-
parasite interactions and the consequences on population dynamics and disease spread.
Chapter 1 Introduction
13
Specifically, aims of the chapters are:
Chapter 2: to highlight the importance of testing a wide variety of genotypes in
toxicity tests, and to show that there is Daphnia genetic and species variation in
sensitivity to the pesticide diazinon.
Chapter 3: to test whether the combined exposure to parasites and pesticides affect
the fitness of Daphnia magna and whether these fitness consequences change through
time as a population evolves.
Chapter 4: to follow the taxa and clonal dynamics in experimental Daphnia
communities after parasite and pesticide exposure.
Chapter 5: to investigate the environmental and evolutionary effects of pesticide
exposure on parasite fitness and virulence.
Chapter 6: to explore how eight relationships between parasite virulence and
environmental quality alter the ability of parasites to spread across an environmental
gradient using epidemiological models.
Chapter 7: to summarize the above findings and discuss the importance of multiple
stressors, as well as G×E×E interactions, in an ecological and evolutionary context,
and to highlight future research questions.
Outline of the thesis
There are many studies showing the harmful effects of the pesticide diazinon on Daphnia.
Although it is common to conduct toxicology studies experiments on single clones,
Chapter 2 highlights the importance of considering the genetic diversity of test organisms. I
further show that acute toxicity of diazinon affects Daphnia species and conspecific clones
differently. In ecosystems, organisms are exposed to natural stressors, in addition to
anthropogenic inputs. Therefore, in Chapter 3 I tested the combined influence of disease, a
natural stressor, and chemical pollution on host fitness by exposing Daphnia magna clones
hatched from different sediment layers to the parasite Pasteuria ramosa and the pesticide
diazinon. Effects observed in life-history experiments on single individuals are useful to test
the effect on changes in susceptibility and life history traits for the specific combination of
abiotic and biotic stressors. However, extrapolating these results to predict the effect on
communities is difficult given that interactions between and within taxon are not taken into
account. In Chapter 4 I followed changes in experimental Daphnia communities (consisting
of two taxa and three clones per taxon), after exposure to the fungal parasite
Metschnikowia sp. and/or the pesticide diazinon. I tracked changes in density, prevalence,
genetic composition, fecundity and size of Daphnia over more than a 3 month period. In
addition to the hosts, parasites exposed to pesticide could also be affected, yet the
evolutionary consequences of long-lasting exposure to pesticides on parasites have not been
studied in great detail. In Chapter 5, I tested whether there were environmental and
Introduction Chapter 1
14
evolutionary effects of diazinon on parasite fitness and virulence. If an environmental stress
factor has high impact on parasite virulence, this might significantly impact disease dynamics
in aquatic systems. Although theoretical studies have found that the environment can affect
host-parasite population dynamics in nature, little is known of the influence of the interaction
between environment and virulence on the spread of disease through a host population.
Assuming different virulence relationships with the environment, I used an epidemiological
model in Chapter 6 to explore how condition-dependent virulence and environmental quality
alter disease dynamics.
Final discussion, overall conclusions and future perspectives are presented in Chapter 7.
References
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1978. Regulation and stability of host-parasite population
interactions .Regulatory processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 47:219-247.
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1979. Population biology of infectious-diseases. Nature
280:361-367.
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1982. Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology
85:411-426.
Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: The evolution and genetics of sexuality. University
of California Press, Berkely, California, USA.
Bittner, K., K. O. Rothhaupt, and D. Ebert. 2002. Ecological interactions of the microparasite
Caullerya mesnili and its host Daphnia galeata. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47:300-305.
Boots, M., and A. Sasaki. 2003. Parasite evolution and extinctions. Ecol. Lett. 6:176-182.
Brown, M. J. F., R. Schmid-Hempel, and P. Schmid-Hempel. 2003. Strong context-dependent
virulence in a host-parasite system: Reconciling genetic evidence with theory. J.
Anim. Ecol. 72:994-1002.
Caceres, C. E., S. R. Hall, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, C. Helmle, and S. MacIntyre. 2006.
Physical structure of lakes constrains epidemics in Daphnia populations. Ecology
87:1438-1444.
Chu, F. L. E., and R. C. Hale. 1994. Relationship between pollution and susceptibility to
infectious-disease in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Environ. Res.
38:243-256.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple
stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. J.
Appl. Ecol. 45:1820-1828.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2011. Fitness and virulence of a bacterial endoparasite in an
environmentally stressed crustacean host. Parasitology 138:122-131.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Coors, A., J. Vanoverbeke, T. De Bie, and L. De Meester. 2009. Land use, genetic diversity
and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol.
95:71-79.
Cornet, S., and G. Sorci. 2010. Parasite virulence when the infection reduces the host immune
response. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 277:1929-1935.
Chapter 1 Introduction
15
Daszak, P., A. A. Cunningham, and A. D. Hyatt. 2001. Anthropogenic environmental change
and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Trop. 78:103-116.
Decaestecker, E., S. Gaba, J. A. M. Raeymaekers, R. Stoks, L. Van Kerckhoven, D. Ebert,
and L. & De Meester. 2007. Host–parasite „Red Queen‟ dynamics archived in pond
sediment. Nature 450:870-873.
Decaestecker, E., C. Lefever, L. De Meester, and D. Ebert. 2004. Haunted by the past:
Evidence for dormant stage banks of microparasites and epibionts of Daphnia.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:1355-1364.
Duffy, M. A., and S. R. Hall. 2008. Selective predation and rapid evolution can jointly
dampen effects of virulent parasites on Daphnia populations. Am. Nat. 171:499-510.
Dybdahl, M. F., and C. M. Lively. 1998. Host-parasite coevolution: Evidence for rare
advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52:1057-1066.
Ebert, D. 1995. The ecological interactions between a microsporidian parasite and its host
Daphnia magna. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:361-369.
Ebert, D. 2005. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. Bethesda
(MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology
Information.
Ebert, D., P. Rainey, T. M. Embley, and D. Scholz. 1996. Development, life cycle,
ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Pasteuria ramosa (Metchnikoff 1888):
Rediscovery of an obligate endoparasite of Daphnia magna Straus. Philos. trans. R.
Soc. 351:1689-1701.
Ferguson, H. M., and A. F. Read. 2002. Genetic and environmental determinants of malaria
parasite virulence in mosquitoes. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 269:1217-1224.
Galloway, T., and R. Handy. 2003. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides.
Ecotoxicology 12:345-363.
Gaworecki, K. M., A. P. Roberts, N. Ellis, A. D. Sowers, and S. J. Klaine. 2009. Biochemical
and behavioral effects of diazinon exposure in hybrid striped bass. Environ. Toxicol.
Chem. 28:105-112.
Giddings, J. M., L. W. Hall, and K. R. Solomon. 2000. Ecological risks of diazinon from
agricultural use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins, California. Risk. Anal.
20:545-572.
Green, J. 1974. Parasites and epibionts of Cladoceran. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 32:417-515.
Hall, S. R., C. R. Becker, J. L. Simonis, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caaceres.
2009a. Friendly competition: Evidence for a dilution effect among competitors in a
planktonic host-parasite system. Ecology 90:791-801.
Hall, S. R., Duffy, M. A., Tessier, A. J. & Caceres, C. E. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity of
daphniid parasitism within lakes. Oecologia 143:635-644.
Hall, S. R., J. L. Simonis, R. M. Nisbet, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2009b. Resource
ecology of virulence in a planktonic host-parasite system: An explanation using
dynamic energy budgets. Am. Nat. 174:149-162.
Hall, S. R., L. Sivars-Becker, C. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2007.
Eating yourself sick: Transmission of disease as a function of foraging ecology. Ecol.
Lett. 10:207-218.
Hall, S. R., A. J. Tessier, M. A. Duffy, M. Huebner, and C. E. Cáceres. 2006. Warmer does
not have to mean sicker: Temperature and predators can jointly drive timing of
epidemics. Ecology 87:1684-1695.
Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282-290.
Hamilton, W. D., R. Axelrod, and R. Tanese. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to
resist parasites (a review). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:3566-3573.
Introduction Chapter 1
16
Hanazato, T. 2001. Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: An ecological perspective.
Environ. Pollut. 112:1-10.
Hudson, P., and J. Greenman. 1998. Competition mediated by parasites: Biological and
theoretical progress. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:387-390.
Jaenike, J. 1978. A hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol.
Theor. 3:191-194.
Jansen, M., A. Coors, R. Stoks, and L. De Meester. 2011a. Evolutionary ecotoxicology of
pesticide resistance: A case study in Daphnia. Ecotoxicology 20:543-551.
Jansen, M., L. De Meester, A. Cielen, C. C. Buser, and R. Stoks. 2011b. The interplay of past
and current stress exposure on the water flea Daphnia. Funct. Ecol. 25: 974-982.
Jansen, M., R. Stoks, E. Decaestecker, A. Coors, F. Van de Meutter, and L. De Meester. 2010.
Local exposure shapes spatial patterns in infectivity and community structure of
Daphnia parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:1023-1033.
Johnson, P. T. J., A. R. Ives, R. C. Lathrop, and S. R. Carpenter. 2009. Long-term disease
dynamics in lakes: Causes and consequences of chytrid infections in Daphnia
populations. Ecology 90:132-144.
Johnson, P. T. J., D. E. Stanton, E. R. Preu, K. J. Forshay, and S. R. Carpenter. 2006. Dining
on disease: How interactions between infection and environment affect predation risk.
Ecology 87:1973-1980.
Jokela, J., M. Dybdahl, F. &, and C. Lively. 2009. The maintenance of sex, clonal dynamics,
and host-parasite coevolution in a mixed population of sexual and asexual snails. Am.
Nat. 209:S43-S53.
Jokela, J., C. M. Lively, J. Taskinen, and A. D. Peters. 1999. Effect of starvation on parasite-
induced mortality in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia
119:320-325.
Jokela, J., J. Taskinen, P. Mutikainen, and K. Kopp. 2005. Virulence of parasites in hosts
under environmental stress: Experiments with anoxia and starvation. Oikos 108:156-
164.
Keller, B., J. Wolinska, M. Manca, and P. Spaak. 2008. Spatial, environmental and
anthropogenic effects on the taxa composition of hybridizing Daphnia. Philos. trans.
R. Soc.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Koskella, B., and C. M. Lively. 2009. Evidence for negative frequency-dependent selection
during experimental coevolution of a freshwater snail and sterilizing trematode.
Evolution 63:2213-2221.
Lafferty, K. D., and R. D. Holt. 2003. How should environmental stress affect the population
dynamics of disease? Ecol. Lett. 6:654-664.
Lambrechts, L., S. Fellous, and J. Koella. 2006. Coevolutionary interactions between host and
parasite genotypes. Trends Parasitol. 22:12-16.
Lazzaro, B. P., and T. J. Little. 2009. Immunity in a variable world. Philos. trans. R. Soc.
364:15-26.
Little, T. J., and D. Ebert. 2000. The cause of parasitic infection in natural populations of
Daphnia (Crustacea : Cladocera): The role of host genetics. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci.
267:2037-2042.
Lohr, J. N., M. B. Yin, and J. Wolinska. 2010. Prior residency does not always pay off - Co-
infections in Daphnia. Parasitology 137:1493-1500.
Chapter 1 Introduction
17
McDowell, J. E., B. A. Lancaster, D. F. Leavitt, P. Rantamaki, and B. Ripley. 1999. The
effects of lipophilic organic contaminants on reproductive physiology and disease
processes in marine bivalve molluscs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44:903-909.
Metchnikoff, E. 1888. Pasteuria ramosa un representant des bacteries à division
longitudinale. Ann. I. Pasteur. Paris. 4:165-170.
Mitchell, S. E., and A. F. Read. 2005. Poor maternal environment enhances offspring disease
resistance in an invertebrate. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 272:2601-2607.
Moret, Y., and P. Schmid-Hempel. 2000. Survival for immunity: The price of immune system
activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290:1166-1168.
Murray, D. L., L. B. Keith, and J. R. Cary. 1998. Do parasitism and nutritional status interact
to affect production in snowshoe hares? Ecology 79:1209-1222.
Pedersen, J. A., M. A. Yeager, and I. H. Suffet. 2006. Organophosphorus insecticides in
agricultural and residential runoff: Field observations and implications for total
maximum daily load development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:2120-2127.
Petrusek, A., J. Seda, J. Machácek, Ruthová, and P. Smilauer. 2008. Daphnia hybridization
along ecological gradients in pelagic environments: The potential for the presence of
hybrid zones in plankton. Philos. trans. R. Soc. 363:2931-2941.
Pietrock, M., and D. J. Marcogliese. 2003. Free-living endohelminth stages: At the mercy of
environmental conditions. Trends Parasitol. 19:293-299.
Pulkkinen, K., and D. Ebert. 2004. Host starvation decreases parasite load and mean host size
in experimental populations. Ecology 85:823-833.
Rohr, J. R., and P. W. Crumrine. 2005. Effects of an herbicide and an insecticide on pond
community structure and processes. Ecol. Appl. 15:1135-1147.
Rohr, J. R., T. R. Raffel, S. K. Sessions, and P. J. Hudson. 2008. Understanding the net
effects of pesticides on amphibian trematode infections. Ecol. Appl. 18:1743-1753.
Sanchez, M., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, and E. Andreu-Molinar. 1998. Evaluation of a
Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ. Sci. Health
Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 33:785-797.
Sasaki, A. 2000. Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system. Proc. R.
Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 267:2183-2188.
Schmid-Hempel, P. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of insect immune defenses. Pp. 529-551.
Annu. Rev. Entomol.
Schwenk, K., and P. Spaak. 1995. Evolutionary and ecological consequences of interspecific
hybridization in cladocerans. Experientia 51:465-481.
Seppälä, O., K. Liljeroos, A. Karvonen, and J. Jokela. 2008. Host condition as a constraint for
parasite reproduction. Oikos 117:749-753.
Sheldon, B. C., and S. Verhulst. 1996. Ecological immunology: Costly parasite defences and
trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:317-321.
Singer, H., S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Luck, J. Hollender, and A. C. Alder. 2010. Determination of
biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass
spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water. Environ. Pollut.
158:3054-3064.
Strom, S., G. Wolfe, J. Holmes, H. Stecher, C. Shimeneck, S. Lambert, and E. Moreno. 2003.
Chemical defense in the microplankton I: Feeding and growth rates of heterotrophic
protists on the DMS-producing phytoplankter Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr.
48:217-229.
Thomas, M. B., and S. Blanford. 2003. Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactions. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 18:344-350.
Introduction Chapter 1
18
Tschirren, B., L. L. Bischoff, V. Saladin, and H. Richner. 2007. Host condition and host
immunity affect parasite fitness in a bird-ectoparasite system. Funct. Ecol. 21:372-
378.
Tseng, M. 2004. Sex-specific response of a mosquito to parasites and crowding. Proc. R. Soc.
B. Biol. Sci. 271:S186-S188.
Vale, P. F., A. J. Wilson, A. Best, M. Boots, and T. J. Little. 2011. Epidemiological,
evolutionary, and coevolutionary implications of context-eependent parasitism. Am.
Nat. 177:510-521.
van Valen, L. 1977. The Red Queen. Am. Nat. 111:809-810.
Wittmer, I. K., H. P. Bader, R. Scheidegger, H. Singer, A. Luck, I. Hanke, C. Carlsson, and C.
Stamm. 2010. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide
dynamics in surface waters. Water Res. 44:2850-2862.
Wolinska, J., S. Giessler, and H. Koerner. 2009. Molecular identification and hidden diversity
of novel Daphnia parasites from European lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7051-
7059.
Wolinska, J., and K. C. King. 2009. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite
interactions. Trends Parasitol. 25:236-244.
Wolinska, J., J. Seda, H. Koerner, P. Smilauer, and A. Petrusek. 2011. Spatial variation of
Daphnia parasite load within individual water bodies. J. Plankton Res. 33:1284-1294.
Woodwell, G. M., C. F. Wurster, and P. A. Isaacson. 1967. DDT residues in an east coast
estuary-A case of biological concentration of a persistent insecticide. Science 156:821-
&.
Yin, M., C. Laforsch, J. N. Lohr, and J. Wolinska. 2011. Predator-induced defence makes
Daphnia more vulnerable to parasites. Evolution 65:1482-1488.
Yin, M. B., J. Wolinska, and S. Gieler. 2010. Clonal diversity, clonal persistence and rapid
taxon replacement in natural populations of species and hybrids of the Daphnia
longispina complex. Mol. Ecol. 19:4168-4178.
19
Chapter 2
Variation within and between species cannot be ignored in toxicity
tests
Claudia C. Buser, Jennifer Fox, Andreas Kretschmann & Piet Spaak
(In preparation, target journal Aquatic Toxicology)
Abstract
Although chemical contamination can affect whole ecosystems, many toxicological studies of
aquatic pollutants are still conducted on only a single clone of a single Daphnia species.
Variation in sensitivity towards a toxicant within and between species is not taken into
account, which could lead to inaccurate estimates of the harm of the toxicant. In this study we
show that there is substantial variation within and between three different Daphnia species in
their responses to the common pesticide. To estimate the effect on a population or even on
ecosystems level we therefore suggest conducting toxicological experiments with more than
one clone.
Keywords
Acute toxicity test, Daphnia clonal variation, diazinon, ecology, fitness
LC50 and species variation Chapter 2
20
Introduction
Chemical contaminants are very widespread in the environment. Aquatic ecosystems in
particular encounter many chemical stressors because runoff into rivers and lakes concentrates
chemicals from across a watershed. Watersheds are important and for humans widely used as
drinking water and food sources, though we are also affected (directly or indirectly) by
pollutants in ponds and lakes.
Although scientists from different fields try to assess the toxic effect of chemical
contaminants on individual organisms in order to predict potential impacts of chemicals in the
environment, the fields of toxicology and ecology are still quite separate (Chapman 2002).
While in ecology genetic variation is taken into account when testing for effects of stressors,
in toxicology it is still common to test the toxic potential of a potential toxicant on only one
clone of a single species. For example, many toxicology studies on aquatic organisms focus
on a single Daphnia magna reference clone (Adema 1978). This provides toxicologists with a
good estimate of the toxic potency of a chemical and leads, for example, to fast decisions
about whether and in which concentrations a pesticide can be used in agriculture. But natural
populations normally harbour a genetically diverse set of individuals, all potentially adapted
to quite different environments, and thus the harm of a chemical compound can vary between
and also within different taxa. This variation in response can be due to variation in traits, such
as size, mode of respiration, feeding type and habit and life-cycle duration (Baird & Van den
Brink 2007; Rubach et al. 2010), variation in biotransformation processes and in sensitivity of
the target site (e.g., a certain enzyme) inside an organism (Keizer et al. 1995; Barata et al.
2001; Damasio et al. 2007), or because of adaptation of a species towards the chemical
compound (Klerks & Weis 1987).
Acute toxicity tests are one common method for assessing the hazardous potential of
chemicals (OECD/OCDE 2004). They focus on acute toxic effects like immobilization and
mortality of organisms after short-term exposure. Therefore they are appropriate for the
estimation of effects of chemicals present in the environment in rather high concentrations
and short pulses e.g., due to an accidental spill or a fast degradation. These acute effects
observed on an individual level (e.g., mortality after exposure to short pulses of acutely toxic
concentrations) might have a long-term effect at the population level.
Organophosphorous insecticides are regularly detected in aquatic environments, e.g., in
surface waters due to surface run-off from agricultural fields after rain events (Strom et al.
2003; Pedersen et al. 2006; Wittmer et al. 2010). The organophosphate diazinon (O,O-diethyl
O-[2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl] phosphothionate) is an insecticide widely applied in
Chapter 2 LC50 and species variation
21
agricultural systems (e.g., Konstantinou et al. 2006; Wittmer et al. 2010) and has been shown
to affect and to be highly toxic to aquatic animals (Ankley et al. 1991; Ceron et al. 1996; van
der Geest et al. 2000; Marcial et al. 2005; Gaworecki et al. 2009). Acute toxic effects
(immobilization, mortality) of diazinon are related to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase
(AChE), an enzyme essential for proper functioning of the nervous system (Chambers 1992;
Maxwell et al. 2006). Diazinon is often found in aquatic environments (Miles & Harris 1978;
Konstantinou et al. 2006; Singer et al. 2010). It can be detected in surface waters mainly in
the ng/L range, but also acute concentrations (μg/L range) in short pulses have been recorded
(Wittmer et al. 2010).
Plankton crustaceans are very abundant and sensitive to environmental conditions, for
example to organophosphorous insecticides (Vaal et al. 1997). They are near the bottom of
aquatic food webs and are ecologically important as both grazers of algae and food sources
for fish and other invertebrates. Daphnia, belonging to the Cladocera, are one genus of
planktonic crustaceans often used as model organism in fields like ecology and toxicology.
There are a dozens of Daphnia species differing in size and life history traits (Koivisto 1995),
distributed all over the world. For example Daphnia pulicaria is found in permanent, usually
clear-water, ponds and lakes. Daphnia galeata Sars., 1863 is found in small to very large
permanent lakes, and Daphnia magna is typically found in temporary and permanent ponds
(Hebert 1978). Since D. magna is easy to culture in the lab (Adema 1978; Baudo 1988), this
species is commonly used for toxicity tests (Baudo 1988; ISO_10706 2000).
Many studies have shown the negative effects of diazinon on Daphnia (Fernandez-
Casalderrey et al. 1994; Sanchez et al. 1998; Jemec et al. 2007). Most of these studies test
acute toxicity using only one clone and do not consider the variation within and between taxa.
In nature we rarely find Daphnia populations consisting of only a single clone, so it makes
sense to investigate how results obtained from “one clone studies” relate to the variation that
can be obtained by doing experiments with several clones. Ideally the “one clone” would be
somewhere in the middle of the distribution of the many clones, and would not be an extreme
genotype that shows a behaviour quite different from clones chosen from natural
environments.
In this study, we highlight the importance of taking the genetic diversity of organisms into
account when performing toxicity tests. We show that the toxic response to acutely toxic
diazinon concentrations affect Daphnia species and even clones within a species differently.
LC50 and species variation Chapter 2
22
Material and Methods
Acute toxicity test
Acute toxicity tests were performed according to the OECD Guideline 202 (OECD/OCDE
2004). Diazinon (CAS 333-41-5, 99.5 % purity) was obtained from Ultra Scientific Analytical
Solutions (N. Kingstown RI, USA). For exposure experiments diazinon was dissolved in
acetone and spiked into filtered lake water. We tested 6 different concentrations of diazinon
(0.00, 0.13, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 µg/L), with lake water containing the same amount of
acetone as in the treatments as a control. Nominal exposure concentrations of diazinon were
verified with LC-MS/MS as described in (Kretschmann et al. 2011b). As measured diazinon
concentrations were within ± 20 % of the nominal concentrations, for data analysis nominal
concentrations were used.
Six clones of Daphnia magna, four clones of Daphnia pulicaria, and four clones of
Daphnia galeata were used. The clones were selected from different lakes from several
countries as listed in Table 1, to increase genetic variation. All clones had been cultured in the
laboratory for at least 1 year. Prior to the experiment, clones were raised in multiple source
jars for two generations under standard laboratory conditions. From the second or later clutch
of the third generation we put 5 juveniles (<24 h old) in 10 mL of medium in 50-mL jars, with
3 replicates for each clone in each of the 7 treatments (6 diazinon concentrations and acetone
control). Animals were assessed for survival after 48 h. Daphnia were not fed during the
experiment. Experiments were performed at a temperature of 20 ± 1 °C and a photoperiod of
16 h light and 8 h dark.
Data analysis
Acute toxicity data were evaluated with the program SigmaPlot version 10.0. LC50 values
(concentration at which 50 % of the tested organisms died) and the hill slope (steepness of the
dose-response curve) were obtained by fitting a sigmoidal dose-response curve (four-
parameter logistic equation) to the plot of the fraction of surviving animals (%) vs. log-
transformed diazinon concentrations.
To test if mortality differed within and among taxa according to diazinon concentrations we
used a generalized linear model in SPSS 15.0 with proportion of animals surviving after 48h
as the dependent variable, the concentrations and taxa as fixed factors, and the clones nested
within taxa as a random factor.
Chapter 2 LC50 and species variation
23
Table 1: Overview and distribution of the clones used in the acute toxicity test
Taxa Clone Origin
D. galeata ENDI Lago di Endine, Italy
SEGR Lago del Segrino, Italy
ZUG Lake Zug, Switzerland
ZURI Lake Zurich, Switzerland
D. magna CN2-4 Czech Republic
EK1-1 United Kingdom
HO-1 Hungary
Klon 5 Germany
M10 Belgium
M12 Germany
D. pulicaria A16 Czech Republic
PU3 Netherlands
PUL-ARE Oregon, USA
REZ Czech Republic
Results
Acute toxicity test on three Daphnia species
A comparison of the LC50 values reveals that D. pulicaria and D. galeata had a lower LC50
than D. magna (Table 2, Fig. 1). The LC50 of D. pulicaria was almost 50 % lower than that of
D. magna (0.878 µg/L versus 1.512 µg/L).
Table 2: Summary of LC50 values and hill slope for D. galeata, D. magna and D. pulicaria.
Species R Best fit hill slope value ± SE Best fit LC50 (µg/L) value ± SE
D. galeata 0.9960 -0.099 ± 0.025 1.112 ± 0.022
D. magna 0.9997 -0.122 ± 0.005 1.512 ± 0.006
D. pulicaria 0.9995 -0.070 ± 0.014 0.878 ± 0.013
The generalized linear model revealed highly significant main effects of diazinon
concentration (χ2= 1955.187, df= 6 , p< 0.001), species (χ
2= 81.264, df= 2, p< 0.001, Fig. 1),
and clone (χ2= 146.691, df= 12, p< 0.001, Fig. 2) on survival. The higher the diazinon
concentration, the lower the proportion of animals that survived (Fig. 1 & Fig. 2). The three
species differed in their response, with D. magna showing higher survival than the other two
species.
LC50 and species variation Chapter 2
24
Fig. 1: Fitted dose-response curves show the variation in survival (mean ± SE) after 48 h of diazinon exposure
among the three Daphnia species. The LC50 values for each species are back transformed.
There was also a significant interaction for species × diazinon concentration (χ2= 121.448,
df= 12 , p< 0.001). For example, in the absence of diazinon or at low diazinon concentrations
fewer animals of D. pulicaria died compared to D. galeata, but at higher diazinon
concentrations D. pulicaria was the most sensitive species (Fig. 1). We also observed similar
interactions within the species on a clonal level (clone × diazinon concentration: χ2= 428.965,
df= 66 , p< 0.001, Fig. 2). Within different clones of the species D. magna, the clones CN2-4
and M10 were found to be the most resistant ones (see Fig. 2B). Survival of the CN2-4 clone
was not affected by any diazinon concentration (in all concentrations 100% survival).
Survival of the M10 clone was affected only at the highest diazinon concentration applied
(proportion of M10 clones surviving at 2 µg/L: 0.65 ± 0.236 (mean ± SE); proportion of CN2-
4 clones surviving at 2 µg/L: 1.0 ± 0).
Chapter 2 LC50 and species variation
25
Fig. 2: Proportion (mean ± SE) of clones
surviving after 48 hours at different
concentrations of diazinon within the (A)
D. galeata, (B) D. magna, (C) D. pulicaria.
Discussion
The species and even clones within a single species reacted significantly differently from each
other when exposed to diazinon for 48 h. In our acute test D. magna was the species least
sensitive to diazinon, whereas D. galeata and D. pulicaria have a higher mortality rate when
exposed to the pesticide. The difference in sensitivity could be due to several (not mutually
exclusive) reasons. First, larger animals often have a lower sensitivity towards toxicants. For
example, a positive relationship between EC50 (concentration at which 50 % of the tested
organism show an effect) values and body size was found by Vesela and Vijverberg (2007)
when four different Daphnia species were exposed to zinc. In other interspecies comparisons
large-sized Daphnia tended to be more tolerant to toxic substances than smaller ones (Winner
LC50 and species variation Chapter 2
26
& Farrell 1976; Koivisto et al. 1992). A correlation between sensitivity and size would
explain why the larger D. magna is less sensitive than the two smaller species in our
experiments. This hypothesis does not hold true for the finding that D. pulicaria is more
sensitive than D. galeata in our study; however the size difference between these two species
is not as great as with D. magna. Also this size-hypothesis does not explain the high variation
within taxa, as the size differences within a taxa are small. Second, the difference in
sensitivity could be due to differences in the habitats the species live in. D. magna lives more
in shallow ponds, which are unpredictable habitats with large temporal and spatial variability
in abiotic factors; whereas the other two species live in a larger water habitats that are more
stable. Adaptation to natural abiotic stress may increase pollution tolerance (Fisher 1977;
Leblanc 1985). For example, Koivisto et al. (1992) show that Daphnia species living in ponds
were less sensitive to copper than lake-living cladocerans. Finally, the observed difference in
sensitivity towards diazinon might also be due to different intrinsic properties, like different
reactivities/sensitivities of biotransforming enzymes as well as of the target site AChE. Keizer
et al. (1995) explained differences in the toxicity of diazinon towards different fish species by
an observed variation in AChE sensitivity toward inhibition by diazoxon, the active
metabolite of diazinon, in combination with the ability to biotransform diazinon. A correlation
between the sensitivity towards diazinon and the sensitivity of AChE has also been shown for
D. magna (Kretschmann et al. 2011a).
In our study we not only showed variation between species; we also demonstrated that clones
within a species show very different levels of sensitivity to the pesticide. An ideal model
clone should be in the middle of the distribution to provide a good mean estimate for the harm
within the species. In our example, if only the CN2-4 or M10 clone of the species D. magna
was used for assessing the hazardous potential of a chemical this might lead to an
underestimation of risk towards other, more sensitive clones.
When assessing the effects of chemicals on aquatic organisms, it makes sense to choose an
ecologically significant species, such as Daphnia, that may be near the base of the food web.
Concentrations affecting this species could have an impact on species higher up in the food
chain. Therefore we recommend the use of more than one clone in toxicology studies in order
to take into account the variation within and between species and to minimize the risk of
underestimating the effects of a chemical (Cairns 1984; Chapman 2000). If (for whatever
reason) it is possible to perform an experiment with only a single clone, we recommend using
a clone known to be in the middle of the sensitivity distribution.
Chapter 2 LC50 and species variation
27
Acknowledgment
We thank Nora Brede for her help setting up the experiment and Christoph Haag for
comments on the manuscript. The study was financially supported by the Swiss National
Science Foundation (SNF) and the ETH Board (CCES-GEDIHAP).
References
Adema, D. M. M. 1978. Daphnia magna as a test animal in acute and chronic toxicity tests.
Hydrobiologia 59:125-134.
Ankley, G. T., J. R. Dierkes, D. A. Jensen, and G. S. Peterson. 1991. Piperonyl butoxide as a
tool in aquatic toxiccological research with organophophate insecticides. Ecotoxicol.
Environ. Saf. 21:266-274.
Baird, D. J., and P. J. Van den Brink. 2007. Using biological traits to predict species
sensitivity to toxic substances. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 67:296-301.
Barata, C., D. J. Baird, A. Soares, and L. Guilhermino. 2001. Biochemical factors
contributing to response variation among resistant and sensitive clones of Daphnia
magna Straus exposed to ethyl parathion. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 49:155-163.
Baudo, R. 1988. Ecotoxicological testing with Daphnia. Pp. 461-482 in R. H. Peters, and R.
De Bernardi, eds. Daphnia. Memorie dell'instituto di idrobiologia.
Cairns, J. 1984. Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental-
hazard. Environ. Monit. Assess. 4:259-273.
Ceron, J. J., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, C. GutierrezPanizo, and E. AndreuMoliner. 1996.
Effects of diazinon exposure on cholinesterase activity in different tissues of European
eel (Anguilla anguilla). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 35:222-225.
Chambers, H. W. 1992. Organophosphorus compounds: An overview in J. E. Chambers, and
P. E. Levi, eds. Organophosphates. Chemistry, fate, and effects. Academic Press, San
Diego, California.
Chapman, P. M. 2000. Whole effluent toxicity testing - Usefulness, level of protection, and
risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:3-13.
Chapman, P. M. 2002. Integrating toxicology and ecology: Putting the "eco" into
ecotoxicology. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44:7-15.
Damasio, J., L. Guilhermino, A. Soares, M. C. Riva, and C. Barata. 2007. Biochemical
mechanisms of resistance in Daphnia magna exposed to the insecticide fenitrothion.
Chemosphere 70:74-82.
Fernandez-Casalderrey, A., M. D. Ferrando, and E. Andreumoliner. 1994. Effect of sublethal
concentrations of pesticides on the feeding-behavior of Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol.
Environ. Saf. 27:82-89.
Fisher, N. S. 1977. Differential sensitivity of estuarine and open-ocean diatoms to exotic
chemical stress. Am. Nat. 111:871-895.
Gaworecki, K. M., A. P. Roberts, N. Ellis, A. D. Sowers, and S. J. Klaine. 2009. Biochemical
and behavioral effects of diazinon exposure in hybrid striped bass. Environ. Toxicol.
Chem. 28:105-112.
Hebert, P. D. N. 1978. The population biology of Daphnia (Crustacea, Daphniidae). Biol.
Rev. 53:387-426.
ISO_10706. 2000. Water quality - determination of long term toxicity of substances to
Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea). ISO International Standards ISO
10706:2000(E):1-17.
LC50 and species variation Chapter 2
28
Jemec, A., T. Tisler, D. Drobne, K. Sepcic, D. Fournier, and P. Trebse. 2007. Comparative
toxicity of imidacloprid, of its commercial liquid formulation and of diazinon to a
non-target arthropod, the microcrustacean Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 68:1408-
1418.
Keizer, J., G. Dagostino, R. Nagel, T. Volpe, P. Gnemi, and L. Vittozzi. 1995. Enzymological
differences of ache and diazinon hepatic-metabolism - correlation of in-vitro data with
selective toxicity of diazinon to fish species. Sci. Total Environ. 171:213-220.
Klerks, P. L., and J. S. Weis. 1987. Genetic adaptation to heavy-metals in aquatic organisms -
A review. Environ. Pollut. 45:173-205.
Koivisto, S. 1995. Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in
toxicity tests. Environ. Pollut. 90:263-267.
Koivisto, S., M. Ketola, and M. Walls. 1992. Comparison of 5 Cladoceran species in short-
term and long-term copper exposure. Hydrobiologia 248:125-136.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Kretschmann, A., R. Ashauer, K. Hitzfeld, P. Spaak, J. Hollender, and B. I. Escher. 2011a.
Mechanistic toxicodynamic model for receptor-mediated toxicity of diazoxon, the
active metabolite of diazinon, in Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:4980-
4987.
Kretschmann, A., R. Ashauer, T. G. Preuss, P. Spaak, B. I. Escher, and J. Hollender. 2011b.
Toxicokinetic model describing bioconcentration and biotransformation of diazinon in
Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:4995-5002.
Leblanc, G. A. 1985. Effects of copper on the competitive interactions of 2 species of
Cladocera. Environ. Pollut. 37:13-25.
Marcial, H. S., A. Hagiwara, and T. W. Snell. 2005. Effect of some pesticides on reproduction
of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Muller. Hydrobiologia 546:569-575.
Maxwell, D. M., K. M. Brecht, I. Koplovitz, and R. E. Sweeney. 2006. Acetylcholinesterase
inhibition: Does it explain the toxicity of organophosphorus compounds? Arch.
Toxicol. 80:756-760.
Miles, J. R. W., and C. R. Harris. 1978. Insecticide residues in water, sediment, and fish of
drainage system of Holland marsh, Ontario, Canada, 1972-75. J. Econ. Entomol.
71:125-131.
OECD/OCDE. 2004. OECD Guidlines for testing of chemicals, Daphnia sp., acute
immobilisation test.12.
Pedersen, J. A., M. A. Yeager, and I. H. Suffet. 2006. Organophosphorus insecticides in
agricultural and residential runoff: Field observations and implications for total
maximum daily load development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:2120-2127.
Rubach, M. N., D. J. Baird, and P. J. Van den Brink. 2010. A new method for ranking mode-
specific sensitivity of freshwater arthropods to insecticides and its relationship to
biological traits. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 29:476-487.
Sanchez, M., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, and E. Andreu-Molinar. 1998. Evaluation of a
Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ. Sci. Health
Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 33:785-797.
Singer, H., S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Luck, J. Hollender, and A. C. Alder. 2010. Determination of
biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass
spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water. Environ. Pollut.
158:3054-3064.
Strom, S., G. Wolfe, J. Holmes, H. Stecher, C. Shimeneck, S. Lambert, and E. Moreno. 2003.
Chemical defense in the microplankton I: Feeding and growth rates of heterotrophic
Chapter 2 LC50 and species variation
29
protists on the DMS-producing phytoplankter Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr.
48:217-229.
Vaal, M., J. T. vanderWal, J. Hoekstra, and J. Hermens. 1997. Variation in the sensitivity of
aquatic species in relation to the classification of environmental pollutants.
Chemosphere 35:1311-1327.
van der Geest, H. G., G. D. Greve, M. E. Boivin, M. H. S. Kraak, and C. A. M. van Gestel.
2000. Mixture toxicity of copper and diazinon to larvae of the mayfly (Ephoron virgo)
judging additivity at different effect levels. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:2900-2905.
Vesela, S., and J. Vijverberg. 2007. Effect of body size on toxicity of zinc in neonates of four
differently sized Daphnia species. Aquat. Ecol. 41:67-73.
Winner, R. W., and M. P. Farrell. 1976. Acute and chronic toxicity of copper to 4 species of
Daphnia. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33:1685-1691.
Wittmer, I. K., H. P. Bader, R. Scheidegger, H. Singer, A. Luck, I. Hanke, C. Carlsson, and C.
Stamm. 2010. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide
dynamics in surface waters. Water Res. 44:2850-2862.
30
31
Chapter 3
Combined exposure to parasites and pesticides causes increased
mortality in the water flea Daphnia
Claudia C. Buser, Mieke Jansen, Kevin Pauwels, Luc De Meester & Piet Spaak
(In preparation, target journal Freshwater Biology)
Abstract
Organisms are exposed to multiple biotic and abiotic environmental stressors, which can
influence dynamics of individual populations and communities. Species may also genetically
adapt to both natural (e.g., disease) and anthropogenic (e.g., chemical pollution) stress. We set
out to study fitness consequences of exposure to both parasites and pesticides in the water flea
Daphnia and to quantify whether these fitness consequences change through time as a
population evolves. We exposed Daphnia magna clones hatched from dormant eggs isolated
from different time layers of a natural dormant egg bank to the parasite Pasteuria ramosa and
the insecticide diazinon. While our experimental treatments for unknown reasons failed to
induce disease in the Daphnia we did observe a reduced survival of D. magna when exposed
to both parasites and pesticides. No increased mortality upon exposure to individual stressors
was observed. As also no induction of phenoloxidase activity was found, we cannot confirm if
the difference in survival was related to immune suppression. We did not observe an
evolutionary change in fitness response of the Daphnia clones hatched from different time
horizons upon exposure to stressors.
Keywords
Daphnia magna, diazinon, fitness, multiple stressors, Pasteuria ramosa, parasites,
resurrection ecology, dormant eggs
Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings Chapter 3
32
Introduction
In recent years, the importance of multiple stressors on the health of organisms has received
increased attention (e.g., Marcogliese & Pietrock 2011). It is well known that responding to
additional disturbances leads to higher costs, which can result in a reduction of fitness of
exposed individuals (reviewed in Relyea 2003; Sih et al. 2004). Anthropogenic stress is
expected to increase diseases in natural populations (e.g., Daszak 2000). Pesticides, for
example, are used worldwide in agriculture, and have been shown to increase susceptibility to
parasite infections (e.g., Chu & Hale 1994; Gendron et al. 2003; Coors & De Meester 2008;
Rohr et al. 2008; King et al. 2010; Kreutz et al. 2010).
Studies considering abiotic and biotic stressors are often conducted with genotypes sampled
over a spatial gradient (King et al. 2010; Schoebel et al. 2010; Bryner & Rigling 2011; Jansen
et al. 2011). Although this approach does not directly track changes over time (De Meester et
al. 2007), it provides valuable information patterns of genetic adaption to local environmental
conditions (Kawecki & Ebert 2004). In organisms that produce dormant eggs, however,
“resurrection ecology” can be a powerful tool for studying microevolutionary responses to
environmental change (Hairston et al. 1999; Jeppesen et al. 2001; Kerfoot & Weider 2004). In
lake and pond sediments, dormant stages of different organisms can remain viable for decades
or longer (Hairston 1996). Thus it is possible to hatch dormant eggs from a dated sediment
core in the laboratory and compare these “old” genotypes in experiments with current
genotypes from the same pond or lake (Kerfoot et al. 1999). Dormant eggs from different time
periods can therefore be used to examine evolutionary responses to environmental changes.
Several resurrection ecology studies have provided evidence for microevolutionary responses
over only a few generations (e.g., Hairston et al. 1999; Cousyn et al. 2001; Hairston et al.
2001). For example, Hairston et al. (1999) showed that Daphnia hatched from a period when
toxic cyanobacteria were present in Lake Constance were more resistant to a diet with
cyanobacteria. Cousyn et al. (2001) documented microevolutionary changes in phototactic
behaviour in a natural Daphnia population in response to changes in fish predation pressure
and Pauwels et al. (2010) showed that the same population also evolved with respect to
phenoloxidase activity, a component of the invertebrate innate immunity. Decaestecker et al.
(2007) using both Daphnia and its microparasites hatched from different sediment layers,
showed very strong parasite-host co-adaptive responses.
To our knowledge, there are no studies observing the effect of multiple stressors over a
timescale of several decades. In the present study we set out to test whether the combined
exposure to a parasite and a pesticide affected the fitness of Daphnia magna (Straus, 1820)
hatched from different sediment layers.
Chapter 3 Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings
33
Material and Methods
Origin and culture conditions of the host-parasite system and the pesticide
Daphnia magna host clones were used from a previous study (Decaestecker et al. 2007). The
hatched Daphnia came from seven different sediment layers of the Belgian pond OM 2
situated in Heverlee (50°50‟22‟‟N, 4°39‟18‟‟E), covering a time period from about 17 - 28
years (Decaestecker et al. 2007). This pond is characterized by epidemics of Pasteuria
ramosa (Metchnikoff, 1888), a parasite of Daphnia magna (Decaestecker et al. 2007), as well
as intense agricultural activity in the catchment (Coors et al. 2009). In total, we used 13
genetically different clones, two from each sediment layer, except from the oldest, where only
one clone could be used.
P. ramosa spores used for infection were obtained by exposing different individuals of a
single D. magna clone (M10, see Cousyn et al. 2001) originating from the pond Oud Heverlee
to the first few centimetres of the sediment core from the pond Knokke Nat (Belgium
51°21‟25‟‟N, 3°19‟50‟‟E), as described in Jansen et al. (2010). The parasites were collected
from a different pond than the host clones used in the experiment to avoid possible effects of
co-adaption of hosts and parasites (Decaestecker et al. 2007). P. ramosa from Knokke Nat
have been shown to heavily infect D. magna clones from OM 2 (Jansen et al. 2010). To
increase the amount of P. ramosa spores, infected M10 clones were grown for 21 days and
used to infect Daphnia juveniles of the same clone for another generation, before using them
in the experiment as described in Coors et al. (2008). Infected Daphnia become sterilized, are
darkish-red and become larger in body size (Ebert 2005) and are therefore easily recognizable
by eyes. Grounded up, non-infected Daphnia from the M10 clones were used as placebo in
the treatments without parasites.
The organophosphate diazinon (O,O-diethyl O-[2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl]
phosphothionate, CAS 333-41-5, 99.5 % purity, Ultra Scientific Analytical Solutions, N.
Kingstwon RI, USA) is a pesticide developed in 1952 that was heavily used between 1970
and the early 1980s in many parts of the world. Nowadays, it is still frequently used in
agriculture and households, and can thus be detected in aquatic environments (Konstantinou
et al. 2006; Singer et al. 2010). Acute toxic effects of diazinon (e.g., immobilization and
death) are related to the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme essential for proper
function of the nervous system (Chambers 1992; Maxwell et al. 2006). Exposure of D. magna
to sub-lethal concentrations of diazinon leads to a delay in reproduction, a decrease in the
number and size of offspring, and higher adult mortality (Sanchez et al. 1998).
Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings Chapter 3
34
Experimental set-up and procedures
Thirteen clones (from seven sediment layers) were exposed to P. ramosa and diazinon in a
full factorial design, and replicated six times, resulting in 312 experimental units. To
minimize maternal effects at the start of the experiment, the clones were kept under standard
experimental laboratory conditions [1:5 diluted Aachener Daphnien Medium (ADaM,
Klüttgen et al. 1994), 20 ± 2 °C, 16 h:8 h light/dark photoperiod, fed daily with 2 * 105
Scenedesmus obliquus cells/mL] for at least two generations. To start the experiment ten
third-clutch juveniles (less than 24 h old) were put together in 250 mL glasses containing 20
mL medium. The pesticide treatment consisted of a concentration of diazinon (0.25 μg/L),
which is sub-lethal for Daphnia, whereas the pesticide-free control treatment included the
addition of the same amount of the solvent (acetone 0.008 %). Concentrations of diazinon
were verified with spot test with LC-MS/MS as described in Kretschmann et al. (2011b) and
were all within ± 20 % of the nominal concentrations. Individuals belonging to the parasite
treatment were exposed on day 0 and day 2 to 375 × 102
mature spores of P. ramosa per mL
(Jansen et al. 2011). All glasses belonging to the control treatment were treated with ground
up, non-infected, Daphnia of the M10 clone. On day five all Daphnia were transferred into
new glasses (500 mL) containing 400 mL diluted ADaM medium, which was renewed every
third day thereafter. Animals were checked for infections, the number of offspring was
counted and the survival rate was checked daily (and the dead individuals removed) till the
end of the experiment. On day 21, 1 μL haemolymph was taken from two animals per glass
and frozen at -21 °C in 100 μL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer. Phenoloxidase (one
component of the invertebrate innate immune reponse, Söderhäll & Cerenius 1998) was
activated with chymotrypsin (Sigma aldrichchemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland) and
quantified on a spectrophotometer (absorbance 475 nm) following Mucklow et al. (2004). All
traits were quantified as a mean or proportion per set of 10.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. In total, seven experimental units were
lost due to handling errors and excluded from the analysis. Differences in survival rate,
reproductive output as well as phenoloxidase activity were analysed using linear mixed
effects models, with exposure to parasites (yes/no), exposure to diazinon (yes/no) and
sediment layer as fixed factors and clone nested in sediment layer as random factor. We did
not include the interactions between the fixed factors and the random factor clone, as our aims
were not related to clonal variation. The individual reproductive output was calculated (total
amount of offspring born on day x divided by the total amount of living females on day x, for
x going from day 4 to 21, Van Doorslaer et al. 2009). All residuals were distributed normally.
Chapter 3 Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings
35
Results
In this experiment no visible signs of infections could be observed at day 21. Nevertheless,
significant differences in survival rate were observed when Daphnia were exposed to both
stressors: The proportion of surviving individuals was significantly reduced when Daphnia
were exposed to parasite spores and pesticides simultaneously, but not when they were
exposed to a single stressors (Table 1; Fig. 1). There was neither a significant effect of these
factors or their interactions on the individual reproductive output nor on phenoloxidase
activity (see Table 1). Furthermore, there were no interaction effects with sediment layer, nor
a main effect of sediment layer (all p> 0.1, see Table 1). All variables were highly variable
among clones (Table S1).
Table 1: Results of linear mixed effects models describing the influence of exposure to parasite spores, exposure
to diazinon, sediment layer and interactions among these factors on survival, reproduction and phenoloxidase
activity (PO).
Dependent variable Source Numerator df Denominator df F p
Survival rate parasite (P) 1 271.034 3.008 0.084
diazinon (DZ) 1 271.034 2.876 0.091
sediment layer (S) 6 6.036 1.936 0.220
P × DZ 1 271.087 5.099 0.025
P × S 6 271.037 0.689 0.659
DZ × S 6 271.037 1.601 0.147
P × DZ × S 6 271.093 0.982 0.438
reproductive output parasite (P) 1 267.060 0.873 0.351
diazinon (DZ) 1 267.139 0.280 0.597
sediment layer (S) 6 6.034 2.192 0.180
P × DZ 1 267.147 0.234 0.629
P × S 6 267.067 1.042 0.398
DZ × S 6 267.154 1.642 0.136
P × DZ × S 6 267.162 1.321 0.248
PO parasite (P) 1 227.054 0.339 0.561
diazinon (DZ) 1 227.527 0.526 0.469
sediment layer (S) 6 5.898 1.521 0.313
P × DZ 1 227.576 0.341 0.560
P × S 6 227.071 1.225 0.294
DZ × S 6 227.597 1.603 0.147
P × DZ × S 6 227.608 0.803 0.569
Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings Chapter 3
36
Fig. 1: Reaction norms of mean proportion of surviving individuals per glass (± SE) as a function of exposure to
the pesticide diazinon(no/yes) and parasite spores (no= open circles/yes= closed circles).
Discussion
Our key result is an increased mortality upon exposure to both parasites and a pesticide, even
though no parasite infections could be detected visually (see further). Many studies showed
hosts in poor condition have higher parasite-induced mortality than hosts in good condition
(e.g., Braune & Rolff 2001; Krist et al. 2004; Jokela et al. 2005). The negative effect of two
stressors on survival is much stronger compared to individual effects. Immune suppression
under direct exposure to pollutants is a well-known phenomenon (e.g., McDowell et al. 1999;
Aggarwal et al. 2008) and also diazinon is known to have immunomodulatory effects
(Galloway & Handy 2003; Oostingh et al. 2009; Holmstrup et al. 2010). In this study we did
not observe a decrease in phenoloxidase activity in animals exposed to the pesticide diazinon.
This could either be because phenoloxidase activity is not affected by diazinon, which stays in
contrast to other pesticides (Campero et al. 2008), or due to the fact that phenoloxidase was
measured 17 days after pesticide exposure of the Daphnia. The Daphnia which did not die
might have recovered from pesticide stress over the day 21 period, resulting in identical
phenoloxidase activity between pesticide treatments. Kretschmann et al. (2011a) observed a
slow recovery from diazinon exposure after transferring D. magna from media containing
diazinon into clean water. According to their model, a recovery from diazinon exposure
would take place within approximately 17 days. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the
defence against parasite spores, even if they do not cause a visible infection, is associated with
costs for D. magna. Yin et al. (2011) showed that defence against predators induced stronger
infectivity of parasites, while Coors et al. (2008) showed that exposure to pesticides increased
disease progression in Daphnia. Here, we show the reverse, that the enhanced costs of
Chapter 3 Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings
37
defending against parasites spores, even if they do not cause visible infections, increases
mortality upon exposure to a pesticide.
There are several potential reasons why D. magna clones in our study did not get infected by
P. ramosa. First of all, it is possible that either during parasite isolation from the sediment or
during enrichment of parasite spores, M10 clones were infected by parasite spores that were
not infective for OM2 clones, even though P. ramosa from Knokke Nat have been shown to
heavily infect D. magna clones from OM 2 (Jansen et al. 2010). It is possible that our
additional round of infection of clone M10 resulted in a bottleneck with respect to the number
of parasite lineages, and that a strain was selected which by chance did not infect OM2
clones. Alternatively, it may be that, for unknown reasons, the number of viable P. ramosa
spores decreased to below threshold levels in the time between estimating their density and
using them in the experiment. Low spore concentrations result in failure to induce disease
(Ben-Ami et al. 2008). The observed increased mortality in our combined parasites ×
pesticides exposure treatment may thus be associated with either exposure to a below-
threshold concentration of parasite spores or exposure to spores that were not infective.
We did not find any effect of sediment layer on any measured trait, which is in contrast to
Decaestecker et al. (2007), who found a correlation between parasite density and years as well
as with the study of Pauwels et al. (2010), who found differences in levels of Daphnia
phenoloxidase activity over time. The fact that our spore solution did not cause visible
infections in this study as well as having few clones per sediment layer could be the reason
why we do not find any sediment layer effect. In case of the diazinon treatment alone, we
never expected to find a sediment layer effect. First of all, OM 2 is surrounded by farm land,
but the historical use of diazinon is not well documented. Therefore we do not know if
diazinon was ever present in this lake. Additionally, it might be diazinon degraded too fast not
allowing enough time for the hosts to adapt. Nevertheless, we encourage scientist to study
evolutionary responses to environmental changes using dormant eggs, as this approach is
straightforward to document microevolutionary changes in natural populations. Also
multiples stressors should be included, since this is a more realistic representation of natural
situations.
Acknowledgment
We thank several members of the Luc De Meester‟s group for their help during the
experiment and Andreas Kretschmann for helping verifying the diazinon concentration. The
manuscript improved by comments from Andreas Bruder, Christoph Tellenbach and Mat
Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings Chapter 3
38
Seymour. This research was funded by the ETH Board (CCES-GEDIHAP), the Mobility
Support from Eawag and the IWT, Flanders.
References
Aggarwal, M., S. B. Naraharisetti, S. Dandapat, G. H. Degen, and J. K. Malik. 2008.
Perturbations in immune responses induced by concurrent subchronic exposure to
arsenic and endosulfan. Toxicology 251:51-60.
Ben-Ami, F., R. R. Regoes, and D. Ebert. 2008. A quantitative test of the relationship
between parasite dose and infection probability across different host-parasite
combinations. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 275:853-859.
Braune, P., and J. Rolff. 2001. Parasitism and survival in a damselfly: Does host sex matter?
Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 268:1133-1137.
Bryner, S. F., and D. Rigling. 2011. Temperature-dependent genotype-by-genotype
interaction between a pathogenic fungus and its hyperparasitic virus. Am. Nat. 177:65-
74.
Campero, M., M. De Block, F. Ollevier, and R. Stoks. 2008. Correcting the short-term effect
of food deprivation in a damselfly: Mechanisms and costs. J. Anim. Ecol. 77:66-73.
Chambers, H. W. 1992. Organophosphorus compounds: An overview in J. E. Chambers, and
P. E. Levi, eds. Organophosphates. Chemistry, fate, and effects. Academic Press, San
Diego, California.
Chu, F. L. E., and R. C. Hale. 1994. Relationship between pollution and susceptibility to
infectious-disease in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Environ. Res.
38:243-256.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple
stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. J.
Appl. Ecol. 45:1820-1828.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Coors, A., J. Vanoverbeke, T. De Bie, and L. De Meester. 2009. Land use, genetic diversity
and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol.
95:71-79.
Cousyn, C., L. De Meester, J. K. Colbourne, L. Brendonck, D. Verschuren, and F. Volckaert.
2001. Rapid local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure
in absence of neutral genetic changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:6256-6260.
Daszak, P. 2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife - Threats to biodiversity and human
health. Science 287:1756-1756.
De Meester, L., J. Mergeay, H. Michels, and E. Decaestecker. 2007. Reconstructing
microevolutionary dynamics from layered egg banks. Pp. 159-166. Diapause in
Aquatic Invertebrates Theory and Human Use.
Decaestecker, E., S. Gaba, J. A. M. Raeymaekers, R. Stoks, L. Van Kerckhoven, D. Ebert,
and L. & De Meester. 2007. Host–parasite „Red Queen‟ dynamics archived in pond
sediment. Nature 450:870-873.
Ebert, D. 2005. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. Bethesda
(MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology
Information.
Galloway, T., and R. Handy. 2003. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides.
Ecotoxicology 12:345-363.
Chapter 3 Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings
39
Gendron, A. D., D. J. Marcogliese, S. Barbeau, M. S. Christin, P. Brousseau, S. Ruby, D. Cyr,
and M. Fournier. 2003. Exposure of leopard frogs to a pesticide mixture affects life
history characteristics of the lungworm Rhabdias ranae. Oecologia 135:469-476.
Hairston, N. G. 1996. Zooplankton egg banks as biotic reservoirs in changing environments.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 41:1087-1092.
Hairston, N. G., C. L. Holtmeier, W. Lampert, L. J. Weider, D. M. Post, J. M. Fischer, C. E.
Caceres, J. A. Fox, and U. Gaedke. 2001. Natural selection for grazer resistance to
toxic cyanobacteria: Evolution of phenotypic plasticity? Evolution 55:2203-2214.
Hairston, N. G., Jr., W. Lampert, C. E. Caceres, C. L. Holtmeier, L. J. Weider, U. Gaedke, J.
M. Fischer, J. A. Fox, and D. M. Post. 1999. Lake ecosystems: Rapid evolution
revealed by dormant eggs. Nature 401:446-446.
Holmstrup, M., A. M. Bindesbol, G. J. Oostingh, A. Duschl, V. Scheil, H. R. Kohler, S.
Loureiro, A. Soares, A. L. G. Ferreira, C. Kienle, A. Gerhardt, R. Laskowski, P. E.
Kramarz, M. Bayley, C. Svendsen, and D. J. Spurgeon. 2010. Interactions between
effects of environmental chemicals and natural stressors: A review. Sci. Total Environ.
408:3746-3762.
Jansen, M., R. Stoks, A. Coors, W. van Doorslaer, and L. de Meester. 2011. Collateral
damage: Rapid exposure-induced evolution of pesticide resistance leads to increased
susceptibiltiy to parasites. Evolution.
Jansen, M., R. Stoks, E. Decaestecker, A. Coors, F. Van de Meutter, and L. De Meester. 2010.
Local exposure shapes spatial patterns in infectivity and community structure of
Daphnia parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:1023-1033.
Jeppesen, E., P. Leavitt, L. De Meester, and J. P. Jensen. 2001. Functional ecology and
palaeolimnology: Using cladoceran remains to reconstruct anthropogenic impact.
Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:191-198.
Jokela, J., J. Taskinen, P. Mutikainen, and K. Kopp. 2005. Virulence of parasites in hosts
under environmental stress: Experiments with anoxia and starvation. Oikos 108:156-
164.
Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1225–
1241.
Kerfoot, W. C., J. A. Robbins, and L. J. Weider. 1999. A new approach to historical
reconstruction: Combining descriptive and experimental paleolimnology. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 44:1232-1247.
Kerfoot, W. C., and L. J. Weider. 2004. Experimental paleoecology (resurrection ecology):
Chasing Van Valen's Red Queen hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:1300-1316.
King, K. C., J. D. McLaughlin, M. Boily, and D. J. Marcogliese. 2010. Effects of agricultural
landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biol. Conserv. 143:302-
310.
Klüttgen, B., U. Dulmer, M. Engels, and H. T. Ratte. 1994. ADaM, an artificial freshwater for
the culture of zooplankton. Water Res. 28:743-746.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Kretschmann, A., R. Ashauer, K. Hitzfeld, P. Spaak, J. Hollender, and B. I. Escher. 2011a.
Mechanistic toxicodynamic model for receptor-mediated toxicity of diazoxon, the
active metabolite of diazinon, in Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:4980-
4987.
Kretschmann, A., R. Ashauer, T. G. Preuss, P. Spaak, B. I. Escher, and J. Hollender. 2011b.
Toxicokinetic model describing bioconcentration and biotransformation of diazinon in
Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:4995-5002.
Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings Chapter 3
40
Kreutz, L. C., L. J. G. Barcellos, A. Marteninghe, E. D. dos Santos, and R. Zanatta. 2010.
Exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate or atrazine-based herbicides alters
the phagocytic function and increases the susceptibility of silver catfish fingerlings
(Rhamdia quelen) to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol.
29:694-697.
Krist, A. C., J. Jokela, J. Wiehn, and C. M. Lively. 2004. Effects of host condition on
susceptibility to infection, parasite developmental rate, and parasite transmission in a
snail-trematode interaction. J. Evol. Biol. 17:33-40.
Marcogliese, D. J., and M. Pietrock. 2011. Combined effects of parasites and contaminants on
animal health: Parasites do matter. Trends Parasitol. 27:123-130.
Maxwell, D. M., K. M. Brecht, I. Koplovitz, and R. E. Sweeney. 2006. Acetylcholinesterase
inhibition: Does it explain the toxicity of organophosphorus compounds? Arch.
Toxicol. 80:756-760.
McDowell, J. E., B. A. Lancaster, D. F. Leavitt, P. Rantamaki, and B. Ripley. 1999. The
effects of lipophilic organic contaminants on reproductive physiology and disease
processes in marine bivalve molluscs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44:903-909.
Mucklow, P. T., D. B. Vizoso, K. H. Jensen, D. Refardt, and D. Ebert. 2004. Variation in
phenoloxidase activity and its relation to parasite resistance within and between
populations of Daphnia magna. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 271:1175-1183.
Oostingh, G. J., G. Wichmann, M. Schmittner, I. Lehmann, and A. Duschl. 2009. The
cytotoxic effects of the organophosphates chlorpyrifos and diazinon differ from their
immunomodulating effects. J. Immunotoxicol. 6:136-145.
Pauwels, K., L. De Meester, S. Put, E. Decaestecker, and R. Stoks. 2010. Rapid evolution of
phenoloxidase expression, a component of innate immune function, in a natural
population of Daphnia magna. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55:1408-1413.
Relyea, R. A. 2003. Predator cues and pesticides: A double dose of danger for amphibians.
Ecol. Appl. 13:1515-1521.
Rohr, J. R., A. M. Schotthoefer, T. R. Raffel, H. J. Carrick, N. Halstead, J. T. Hoverman, C.
M. Johnson, L. B. Johnson, C. Lieske, M. D. Piwoni, P. K. Schoff, and V. R. Beasley.
2008. Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species.
Nature 455:1235-1240.
Sanchez, M., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, and E. Andreu-Molinar. 1998. Evaluation of a
Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ. Sci. Health
Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 33:785-797.
Schoebel, C. N., J. Wolinska, and P. Spaak. 2010. Higher parasite resistance in Daphnia
populations with recent epidemics. J. Evol. Biol. 23:2370-2376.
Sih, A., A. M. Bell, and J. L. Kerby. 2004. Two stressors are far deadlier than one. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 19:274-276.
Singer, H., S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Luck, J. Hollender, and A. C. Alder. 2010. Determination of
biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass
spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water. Environ. Pollut.
158:3054-3064.
Söderhäll, K., and L. Cerenius. 1998. Role of the prophenoloxidase-activating system in
invertebrate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10:23-28.
Van Doorslaer, W., R. Stoks, C. Duvivier, A. Bednarska, L. De Meester, and M. Travisano.
2009. Population dynamics determine genetic adaptation to temperature in Daphnia.
Evolution 63:1867-1878.
Yin, M., C. Laforsch, J. N. Lohr, and J. Wolinska. 2011. Predator-induced defence makes
Daphnia more vulnerable to parasites. Evolution 65:1482-1488.
Chapter 3 Multiple stress on Daphnia hatchlings
41
Web appendix
Table S1: Descriptive statistic (mean, standard deviation (SD), number of vials (N)) for survival, reproductive
output and phenoloxidase activity for each clone exposed to the four treatments.
Survival Reproductive output Phenoloxidase activity Clone Sediment layer Treatment mean SD N mean SD N mean SD N
D2-2 1 Control 0.24 0.18 5 6.39 2.03 5 63.97 28.63 3
Diazinon (D) 0.35 0.27 6 4.32 2.87 6 86.52 65.65 5
Parasite (P) 0.30 0.30 6 2.95 1.96 6 132.10 23.21 4
P & D 0.18 0.21 6 3.28 2.76 6 25.85 21.81 3
D2-3 1 Control 0.47 0.32 6 3.52 0.57 6 19.83 27.18 6
Diazinon (D) 0.38 0.35 6 2.60 1.64 6 4.52 7.02 4
Parasite (P) 0.38 0.12 6 4.51 0.60 6 8.57 10.06 6
P & D 0.30 0.32 6 3.12 1.09 6 59.31 41.63 4
D3-1 2 Control 0.56 0.46 6 3.41 1.35 6 47.32 91.88 4
Diazinon (D) 0.83 0.19 4 3.92 2.22 4 85.39 148.79 4
Parasite (P) 0.65 0.34 5 3.08 1.92 5 43.60 24.28 3
P & D 0.75 0.42 6 3.62 1.59 6 69.69 35.49 5
D3-2 2 Control 0.64 0.25 6 4.03 1.54 6 8.46 10.65 5
Diazinon (D) 0.63 0.33 6 4.02 1.11 6 30.52 51.71 5
Parasite (P) 0.65 0.25 6 4.58 1.51 6 9.35 13.65 6
P & D 0.66 0.11 6 4.85 1.27 6 60.74 126.64 6
D4-1 3 Control 0.43 0.22 6 2.73 1.72 6 104.07 116.95 6
Diazinon (D) 0.41 0.36 6 4.30 2.15 5 154.63 149.09 3
Parasite (P) 0.43 0.30 6 3.40 1.61 6 49.01 46.13 4
P & D 0.27 0.12 6 3.52 0.83 6 39.16 62.68 6
D4-2 3 Control 0.90 0.20 6 1.77 0.37 6 35.83 27.22 6
Diazinon (D) 0.68 0.29 6 2.16 0.61 6 150.15 62.94 6
Parasite (P) 0.70 0.31 6 2.47 0.42 6 73.04 45.78 5
P & D 0.30 0.31 6 3.13 1.85 6 92.18 77.72 5
D5-1 4 Control 0.83 0.26 6 2.96 0.63 6 177.30 135.14 5
Diazinon (D) 0.85 0.17 6 3.09 0.29 6 66.83 48.92 3
Parasite (P) 0.52 0.30 6 4.22 1.24 6 62.75 42.63 5
P & D 0.63 0.22 6 4.25 1.21 6 100.93 78.69 5
D5-2 4 Control 0.39 0.14 6 3.11 0.87 6 16.31 19.13 6
Diazinon (D) 0.55 0.25 6 3.31 0.49 6 38.03 49.39 6
Parasite (P) 0.63 0.22 6 3.40 0.79 6 60.49 45.41 6
P & D 0.59 0.11 6 2.71 0.98 6 33.76 28.40 6
D6-1 5 Control 0.58 0.20 6 3.58 0.79 6 54.73 81.01 6
Diazinon (D) 0.28 0.30 6 4.91 2.37 5 13.03 16.18 4
Parasite (P) 0.53 0.19 6 5.56 1.62 6 57.87 52.30 6
P & D 0.23 0.17 6 4.81 1.74 6 26.69 31.50 5
D6-2 5 Control 0.22 0.13 6 3.92 1.01 5 32.45 18.87 5
Diazinon (D) 0.43 0.14 6 5.06 1.11 6 34.50 36.75 6
Parasite (P) 0.33 0.36 6 4.20 0.51 5 58.93 72.87 5
P & D 0.40 0.20 6 4.61 0.87 6 58.29 70.43 6
D7-1 6 Control 0.91 0.12 6 3.23 0.61 6 13.81 15.59 6
Diazinon (D) 0.77 0.14 6 3.89 0.71 6 24.82 16.68 6
Parasite (P) 0.75 0.08 6 3.00 1.10 6 7.48 9.01 6
P & D 0.76 0.25 6 3.44 0.72 6 27.18 40.70 6
D7-2 6 Control 0.52 0.28 6 3.38 1.44 6 15.21 30.71 6
Diazinon (D) 0.50 0.29 6 4.35 1.45 6 30.24 45.06 6
Parasite (P) 0.50 0.25 6 5.40 2.09 6 7.92 8.97 5
P & D 0.41 0.30 5 4.18 1.32 5 5.63 5.33 5
D8-1 7 Control 0.39 0.22 6 3.19 1.06 6 27.11 27.87 6
Diazinon (D) 0.56 0.32 6 2.42 0.48 6 30.59 34.24 5
Parasite (P) 0.66 0.33 5 2.28 0.47 5 53.94 39.48 5
P & D 0.25 0.24 5 3.06 1.42 5 20.54 10.26 4
42
43
Chapter 4
Disease and pollution alter Daphnia community structure
Claudia C. Buser, Piet Spaak & Justyna Wolinska
(submitted to Freshwater Biology)
Abstract
Environmental stressors can influence population and community structure. But a majority of
experimental work on multiple environmental stressors have been tested on an individual
level only. In the present work we followed changes in experimental Daphnia (waterflea)
communities (consisting of two taxa and three clones per taxon) after exposure to the fungal
parasite Metschnikowia sp. and/or the pesticide diazinon. We found a significant shift in taxon
and clonal composition under both stressors. Strikingly, one taxon went extinct in the parasite
and parasite + pesticide treatments. While the pesticide had no effect on total parasite
prevalence, one taxon was more infected when additionally exposed to the pesticide.
Furthermore, the density of all adult females was significantly reduced in the parasite
treatment, but not in the pesticide treatment. Our results demonstrate that dynamics in
Daphnia communities are altered by parasites and pesticide exposure. Given Daphnia‟s key-
role in aquatic food webs, converting primary production to fish food, this may lead to a
higher stress on aquatic ecosystems.
Key words
Competition, Daphnia galeata, frequency-dependent selection, hybrids, Metschnikowia sp.,
parasite, pesticide
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
44
Introduction
Communities are subject to a multitude of abiotic and biotic stressors. One approach to
understand the effect of these multiple stressors on communities is to study the effect of
stressors on single individuals and extrapolate these findings to the higher community level.
The effect of multiple stressors on the individual level has been investigated for several taxa
across the plant and animal kingdom. It has been shown that a combination of abiotic and
biotic stressors is often more harmful than either stressor alone (e.g., Hanazato & Dodson
1995; Folt et al. 1999; Relyea 2003; Sih et al. 2004).
Abiotic stressors (e.g., temperature change, eutrophication, acidification) are very abundant
and can affect the functioning and structure of ecosystems (e.g., Bronmark & Hansson 2002;
Brede et al. 2009). Pesticide pollution is one frequently occurring stressor in aquatic habitats
as pesticides are washed out from agricultural fields after rain events (Pedersen et al. 2006;
Wittmer et al. 2010). For example, zooplankton exposed to a chronic concentration of
pesticides often have fewer and smaller offspring and suffer increased mortality (reviewed in
Hanazato 2001). Among biotic stressors, parasites seem to play an especially important role.
They affect the fitness of host individuals and thus can alter the structure and the diversity of
host populations as well as competition among species (e.g., Combes 1996; Hudson &
Greenman 1998; Jokela et al. 2003; Duncan & Little 2007; Wolinska & Spaak 2009).
Parasite-mediated selection can be increased or decreased by additional biotic or abiotic
stressors in the host environment, like extreme temperature or food shortage (reviewed in
Wolinska & King 2009).
Parasites and pollution may interact to enhance the damage to and selection on host
populations. For example, exposure to pesticides can increase host susceptibility to infection,
as well as enhance parasite virulence, as shown for amphibians (Gendron et al. 2003; Rohr et
al. 2008; King et al. 2010), fish (Kreutz et al. 2010), oysters (Chu & Hale 1994) and
planktonic crustaceans (Coors & De Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Coors et al. 2009;
Coors & De Meester 2011). Many of these studies have been conducted on the individual and
population level. But, the effects of pesticide exposure on the relative genotypes frequencies
is rarely investigated. Hanazato & Yasuno (1987) observed changes in zooplankton species
composition after exposure to insecticides, and Relyea & Hovernan (2008) demonstrated that
pesticide exposure lowered zooplankton diversity and abundance. However, the extent to
which the combined effect of parasites and pesticides alter host composition on a community
or population level remains largely unexplored.
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
45
In this study, we examined how Daphnia (waterflea) communities are affected by exposure to
the parasite Metschnikowia sp. and pesticide diazinon. More specifically, we followed taxa
and genotype dynamics in experimental communities when exposed to both stressors in a full
factorial design. As Daphnia reproduce by cyclical parthenogenesis, we could easily follow
the frequencies of the two taxa and three genotypes (clones) per taxon. We predicted that
parasite and pesticide exposure would additively decrease host density and increase parasite
prevalence because effects of stressors are worse in combination than alone (Hanazato &
Dodson 1995; Folt et al. 1999). However, predictions for the effects of stressors on clonal and
taxa composition are difficult to form given the conflicting results on whether
Metschnikowia sp. infects different taxa and clones to the same extent (Stirnadel & Ebert
1997; Wolinska et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2011) or not (Duffy & Sivars-Becker 2007; Duffy et al.
2011). If the latter is true, the parasite would infect various taxa and clones to different
extents, possible altering the competition among taxa and clones.
Materials and Methods
Host-parasite system
As a model host, we used Daphnia (waterflea) belonging to the D. longispina hybrid
complex. This complex consists of three parental species (D. cucullata G. O. Sars, 1862,
D. galeata G. O. Sars, 1863 and D. longispina O. F. Müller, 1776, as revised in Petrusek et al.
2008) and their interspecific hybrids, and dominates Daphnia communities of European lakes
(e.g., Keller et al. 2008; Petrusek et al. 2008; Yin et al. 2010). The yeast parasite
Metchnikowia sp. (family Hemiascomycetes, Wolinska et al. 2009) commonly infects
Daphnia populations in Europe and the United States (Hall et al. 2005; Caceres et al. 2006;
Wolinska et al. 2011). Needle-like ascospores accumulate in the body cavity and are released
only after host death (Green 1974). Infected Daphnia have fewer offspring and a reduced
lifespan (e.g., Duffy & Hall 2008; Lohr et al. 2010).
Pesticide exposure
The organophosphate diazinon (O,O-diethyl O-[2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl]
phosphothionate) is one of the most used and applied pesticide in agriculture and households,
and is thus detected in several aquatic environments (Miles & Harris 1978; Singer et al.
2010). Acute toxic effects of diazinon (like immobilization, mortality) are related to the
inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme essential for proper function of the nervous
system. Exposure of Daphnia magna to a sub-lethal concentration leads to a delay in
reproduction, a decrease in the number of offspring and offspring size and higher adult
mortality (see Sanchez et al. 1998). Based on the results of sub-lethal concentrations of
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
46
diazinon (CAS: 333-41-5, 99.5 % purity, Ultra Scientific Analytical Solution, N. Kingstown
RI, USA) on D. galeata (see supplementary material, S1) we set our pesticide concentration
to 0.1 μg/L. Similar diazinon concentrations as used in this study have been measured in
natural systems (e.g., Konstantinou et al. 2006; Wittmer et al. 2010).
Origin and care of host and parasite
Both host and parasite were isolated from Ammersee, a natural lake in Germany (surface area:
46.6 km2; coordinates: 48°00‟34‟‟N, 11°07‟02‟‟E), two years prior to the experiment (in
autumn 2008). The Daphnia community of this lake is dominated by D. galeata and
D. galeata × D. longispina hybrids (Yin et al. 2010). Three D. galeata and three
D. galeata × longispina hybrid clones were selected from a larger collection of sampled
clones (taxon and multilocus genotype assignment based on 15 microsatellite loci, for
methods see Yin et al. 2010). Metschnikowia was maintained on a single
D. galeata × longispina clone (AMM_12) by adding uninfected juveniles into the infected
culture every second week (Lohr et al. 2010). Uninfected and infected Daphnia cultures were
kept under standardized conditions (20 °C, 16:8 light-dark photoperiod, fed three times a
week with 1.0 mg C/L green algae, Scenedesmus obliquus). Before the experiment, the
uninfected Daphnia clones were raised in 10 L buckets filled with lake water (Greifensee,
Switzerland; 0.45-μl-filtered and UV-light sterilized), to obtain enough individuals.
Experimental set-up and procedures
We tested whether the presence of parasite and/or pesticide alters the competition between
Daphnia taxa (hereafter we use the term "taxon" for each of the two Daphnia forms tested:
parental D. galeata and D. galeata × longispina hybrids) and within taxa (three clones per
taxon tested). Experimental communities were exposed to four treatments: control (lake water
only), parasite, pesticide and parasite + pesticide. Each treatment was replicated five times.
The diazinon, dissolved in acetone, was added at a final concentration 0.1 μg/L; the respective
amount of acetone was also added to non-pesticide treatments. To obtain parasite spores for
experimental infection, 24 juveniles (four per clone; 3-6 days old) were placed together in a
200 mL jar (one-hundred jars were prepared). Then, 300 heavily infected/uninfected Daphnia
of clone AMM_12 were crushed and equally distributed to the corresponding jars (i.e., fifty
infected and fifty uninfected jars were prepared). The water was stirred daily to re-suspend the
spores and maximise Daphnia/spore contact. Daphnia were daily fed with S. obliquus at an
amount of 1.0 mg C/L. Four days later (i.e., on experimental day 1), the contents of the jars
were added into the respective aquarium (see below).
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
47
On day 1, twenty aquaria (4 treatments × 5 replicates) were prepared, containing 4 L of lake
water. Each aquarium was set up with three D. galeata and three D. galeata × longispina
clones (40 adult females of each clone). In addition, the contents of five spore/control jars was
added into each aquarium, resulting in a total of 360 Daphnia in each aquarium. Every day
200 mL water was added (with or without diazinon), reaching a final volume of 8 L after 22
days. Daphnia were daily fed with 0.3 mg C L-1
S. obliquus. Magnetic stirrers were turned
one minute per day to provide a uniform distribution of parasite spores, pesticide and algae.
Under same experimental conditions, the diazinon degrades at a rate of 2.8 % per day
(supplemental information S2). To compensate for that loss, a corresponding amount of
diazinon/acetone was added to the aquaria every 2nd
week. The experiment lasted 99 days. On
day 57, all animals of one control aquarium died because of a handling error.
Data collection
Daphnia were first sampled on day 29 and then again every second week (i.e., day 43, 57, 71,
85 and 99). From each aquarium three replicate samples were collected after stirring the water
using a Plexiglas tube (diameter: 3 cm) and Daphnia were preserved in 100 % EtOH
(infection estimates from the ethanol preserved samples are similar to those estimated from
live samples; J.W. pers. observation, see also Wolinska et al. 2011). The water level of each
aquarium was refilled to 8 L. The number of infected and uninfected adult females was
counted under a stereomicroscope at a magnification of ×16.0 (Leica M 205 C) to assess
Daphnia density and parasite prevalence. In addition, from the samples collected at day 29
and 99, from each aquarium one subsample of 24 randomly selected adult females were
individually assessed for their body size (from top of the eye to the base of the spine),
fecundity (presence/absence of eggs in the brood pouch), infection status (presence/absence of
parasite spores in the body cavity) and taxon/clonal identity. Scoring presence/absence of
eggs in the brood pouch of Daphnia preserved in EtOH can lead to underestimation of
fecundity, but since all samples were treated the same, a possible underestimation is unlikely
to be treatment-biased.
Daphnia were genotyped at three diagnostic microsatellite loci (SWID 12, SWID 14 and
SWID 10, Brede et al. 2006). The DNA was extracted using HotSHOT DNA extraction
method (Montero-Pau et al. 2008). PCR was carried out using the following cycle profile: an
initial step of 15 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1.5 min at 54 °C and
1 min at 72 °C; with a final extension step of 30 min at 60 °C. The total reaction volume was
12 μl, containing 6 μl Qiagen multiplex PCR mix, 3.4 μl water, 0.6 μl primer mix and 2 μl
DNA template. PCR products were analysed on a sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3730xl
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
48
DNA Analyzer). The microsatellite peaks were scored using Applied Biosystems
GeneMapper® software version 4.0.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using linear models in R 2.10.1 for Windows (R
Development Core Team, 2008). Our model simplification proceeded as follows: from each
initial model we removed higher order terms in order, starting with the least significant term.
We tested whether the exclusion of a term resulted in a significantly poorer model using
likelihood ratio tests as recommended by Crawley (2007). All relevant factors belonging to
the minimum adequate model for each analysis are summarized in Table 1. For the linear
mixed effects models, the highest posterior density (HPD) intervals and associated p-values
for fixed effect parameters were derived using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
sampling methods with the pvals.fnc command of the LANGUAGER library (Baayen et al.
2008). All data satisfied the assumptions of parametric tests (inspected with q-q plots and
plots of residual against fitted values). In the analyses of parasite prevalence and host
susceptibility, only data from aquaria exposed to parasite treatment were included. To correct
for repeated measures we included sampling date as random factor in all the performed
analysis (Pinheiro & Bates 2000; Crawley 2007).
Host density, parasite prevalence and host susceptibility. To examine treatment effects on
host density (measured as the number of adult females/L) or parasite prevalence (proportion
of infected adult females), two separate linear mixed effects models (with the lmer function)
were employed, using either host density or parasite prevalence as dependent variable,
exposure to parasite (yes/no; only in the host density model) and to pesticide (yes/no) as fixed
effects and sampling date as well as aquarium as random effects. To test for the influence of
pesticide addition on the susceptibility of certain taxa, a generalized linear mixed effects
model (glmer function) was used, with an individual being infected (yes/no) as binomial
dependent variable, exposure to pesticide (yes/no) and taxon identity as fixed effects and
sampling date as well as clone (nested within taxon) as random effects.
Host taxon and clonal composition. To test for treatment effects on taxon or clonal
composition (Agresti 2002), two separate log-linear models were used (with the glmer
function, family= poisson distribution). The counts of individuals were treated as dependent
variable, exposure to parasite (yes/no) and to pesticide (yes/no) and taxon/clonal identity as
fixed effects and sampling date and aquarium as random effects. For these and the following
tests, only data collected at day 29 and 99 were analysed.
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
49
Host fecundity and body size. A generalized linear effects model (with the glmer function)
was conducted with the presence of eggs (yes/no) as dependent variable to test for treatment
effects on host fecundity. Differences in the body size of adult Daphnia were examined using
a linear mixed effects model, with size of adult females as dependent variable. In both
models, exposure to parasite (yes/no) and to pesticide (yes/no) and taxon identity were treated
as fixed effects, whereas the sampling date and aquarium were random effects.
Results
Host density, parasite prevalence and host susceptibility. The density of adult females was
significantly reduced by exposure to parasites, but not to pesticides (Table 1; Fig. 1).
Although pesticide exposure had no effect on total parasite prevalence (Table 1; Fig. 2),
susceptibility of the different taxa was affected (see significant pesticide-by-taxon interaction;
Table 1). At day 29, D. galeata × longispina hybrids exposed to pesticides were more
infected than non-exposed hybrids, but this effect was not visible in D. galeata (Fig. 2).
Host taxon and clonal composition. Taxa and clonal composition changed when parasites or
pesticides were added to the aquaria (see the significant parasite-by-taxon/clone and pesticide-
by-taxon/clone interactions; Table 1). At day 29, hybrids were more abundant than D. galeata
across all treatments (Fig. 3). At day 99, however, the no hybrid taxon could be detected in all
the parasite and parasite + pesticide treatments (Fig. 3). At this same time point, six clones
Fig. 1: Changes in mean density (number of
adult females per litre ± SE) across the
different treatments: control (white circles),
pesticide (white squares), parasite (black
circles), and parasite + pesticide (black
squares).
Fig. 2: Changes in mean parasite prevalence
(proportion of infected adult females ± SE)
across the different treatments: parasite (black
circles), and parasite + pesticide (black squares).
Parasite prevalence per taxa at day 29 is shown
(empty symbols). Samples from day 99 were
also genotyped, but the community consisted of
D. galeata only (see Fig. 3).
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
50
were still present in the control treatment, five clones remained in the pesticide treatment, and
the same two D. galeata clones (AMM_47 & 66) remained in the parasite and
parasite + pesticide treatments (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3: Changes in mean taxon frequency (± SE) across the different treatments: (A) control, (B) pesticide, (C)
parasite, and (D) parasite + pesticide (grey: D. galeata; white: D. galeata × longispina hybrids).
Fig. 4: Changes in mean clonal frequency (± SE) across the different treatments: (A) control, (B) pesticide, (C)
parasite, and (D) parasite + pesticide. D. galeata clones are shown in grey (AMM_10, 47, 66), and D. galeata ×
longispina hybrid clones are shown in white (AMM_30, 39, 45).
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
51
Host fecundity and body size. In the parasite and parasite + pesticide treatments, females
were more fecund than in those treatments not exposed to parasites (Table 1; Fig. 5).
D. galeata were more fecund when additionally exposed to pesticide whereas hybrids were
more fecund when not exposed to pesticides (see significant pesticide-by-taxon interaction;
Table 1). Daphnia exposed to parasites were generally smaller than unexposed Daphnia
(Fig. 6). In addition, hybrids were smaller than D. galeata, but only in those treatments not
exposed to parasites (see significant parasite-by-taxon interaction; Table 1, Fig. 6).
Discussion
Parasite exposure had a high impact on the experimental Daphnia communities. As expected,
parasites reduced Daphnia host density, a finding consistent with other Daphnia-
microparasite experimental systems (Ebert et al. 2000; Decaestecker et al. 2005). It was
previously shown that Metschnikowia-infected Daphnia had fewer offspring and a higher
mortality rate than uninfected ones (e.g., Duffy & Hall 2008; Lohr et al. 2010). Conversely, in
our experiment, treatments involving parasite exposure resulted in a higher proportion of
fecund females. Given that fecundity of Daphnia is strongly dependent on resource
availability (Lampert 1978), this result could be due to parasites lowering Daphnia density
and consequently freeing up more resources per host individual.
Fig. 5: Changes in mean proportion of fecund
females (± SE) across the different treatments:
control (white circles), pesticide (white squares),
parasite (black circles) and parasite + pesticide
(black squares).
Fig. 6: Changes in mean body size (± SE) of
adult females across the different treatments:
control (white circles), pesticide (white
squares), parasite (black circles) and
parasite + pesticide (black squares).
21 99 21 99
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
52
Table 1: Statistical models and test statistics for the effect of parasites and pesticides on Daphnia host individual
traits and community composition. We used three kinds of linear models: linear mixed effect model (lmer),
generalized linear mixed effect model (glmer) and log-linear model. Details concerning the model construction
and simplification are provided in the text.
Dependent variable
(variable type) Model Relevant factors Estimate SE t
a/z
b MCMCp
a/p
bc,
Host density lmer parasite -66.670 14.430 -4.662 0.001
(continuous)
Parasite prevalence lmer pesticide 0.043 0.103 0.418 0.676
(continuous)
Host susceptibility glmer pesticide -0.640 0.262 -2.441 0.015
(binomial) taxon 1.708 0.446 3.834 < 0.001
pesticide × taxon 1.117 0.435 0.435 0.007
Taxon frequency log-linearc parasite × taxon -1.714 0.143 -11.979 < 0.001
(counts of individuals) pesticide × taxon -0.281 0.131 -2.143 0.032
Clonal frequency log-linearc parasite × clone
d χ
2:190.83 < 0.001
(counts of individuals) pesticide × cloned χ
2:25.617 < 0.001
Host fecundity glmer parasite 0.693 0.340 2.039 0.041
(binomial) pesticide 0.388 0.356 1.089 0.276
taxon -0.257 0.477 -0.539 0.590
pesticide × taxon -0.719 0.357 -2.017 0.044
Host size lmer parasite -0.223 0.033 -6.729 0.006
(continuous) pesticide -0.058 0.029 -1.995 0.001
taxon -0.092 0.035 -2.619 0.046
parasite × pesticide 0.106 0.040 2.674 0.590
parasite × taxon 0.126 0.030 4.246 0.004 a for lmer b for glmer and log-linear model (except for the clonal frequency model, where χ2 are presented) c single effects not included in the table because they are not meaningful in log-linear models d the overall effect of parasite/pesticide on clonal composition was tested by removing the corresponding interaction term and
comparing this new model with the model including all two-way interactions. ΔDf= 5
Parasites directly altered Daphnia species composition. Although two taxa coexisted in a
parasite-free environment, D. galeata × longispina hybrids went extinct under parasite
pressure. Differences in the susceptibility of the studied taxa may be the cause. At day 29,
D. galeata were less infected than hybrids, despite previous findings that Metschnikowia
infected different taxa and clones to the same extent (Stirnadel & Ebert 1997; Wolinska et al.
2009; Yin et al. 2011). Our result that hybrids had higher parasite prevalence may support the
„hybrid susceptibility‟ hypothesis (Fritz et al. 1994) or be explained by parasite-driven,
negative frequency-dependent selection (Hamilton 1980). At day 29, the more frequent taxon
(hybrids) were the most infected, and at the end of the experiment, hybrids had disappeared
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
53
and D. galeata were common. At this point, D. galeata had higher prevalence of infection.
Such a mechanism has been shown to be responsible for the promotion of genetic diversity in
Daphnia and other invertebrate host populations (Duffy 2008; Wolinska & Spaak 2009;
Berenos et al. 2011; King et al. 2011). As we did not look at the parasite genetic variation, we
cannot confirm, that the observed pattern is due to coevolution. Alternatively, the parasite
strain used in the experiment may have adapted to the hybrid taxon, as the parasite was
maintained for two years on a hybrid clone. This is unlikely, however. Yin et al. (2011) did
not find a different infection rate among D. galeata and hybrid clones, when exposed to a
parasite strain raised on a hybrid Daphnia clone. Also, Duffy & Sivars-Becker (2007) found
no evidence for Metschnikowia adaptation towards different host clones after five host
generations.
Contrary to our expectations that pesticide exposure would decrease Daphnia density due to
delay in reproduction, decrease in number of offspring or reduced survival (Sanchez et al.
1998), density did not differ from the control treatment. This could be the result of pesticide-
tolerant clones replacing sensitive clones, a mechanism described as pollution-induced
community-tolerance hypothesis (Blanck & Wangberg 1988). This mechanism should not
affect density, but only taxon and clonal composition. Indeed, in our experiment both taxon
and clonal composition were influenced by pesticide exposure. The observed increase in
D. galeata frequency in the aquaria containing pesticides, is plausible with respect to the
finding that D. galeata had higher fecundity in the pesticide treatments whereas the hybrid
fecundity was marginally lower when exposed to the pesticide. In contrast to our expectations,
the pesticide did not affect the number of the total infected adult females. However, we
observed that the hybrids (but not D. galeata) were more infected when exposed to the
pesticide compared to unexposed hybrids. Although there are examples that hybrids can be
more susceptible to parasites (i.e., „hybrid susceptibility‟ hypothesis of Fritz et al., 1994), the
sensitivity of hybrids and parental taxa towards pesticides has not previously been compared.
Our observations of reduced hybrid fecundity under pesticide exposure, as well as the higher
susceptibility of hybrids, indicate that hybrids are more affected by both environmental
stressors, parasites and pesticides. This combination of negative responses to both stressors
could lead to the observed higher infection rate under pesticide exposure.
Studies tracking genetic changes of a community exposed to a pesticide as well as studies
examining multiple stressors, especially those taking competition within and among taxa into
account are very rare. The here employed experimental design is a potentially promising tool
for a verification if effects on individual levels are also observed in communities as well as
help to interpret more complex observations of field studies (Marcogliese & Pietrock 2011).
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
54
Although previous studies did observe synergistic effect of the pesticide and parasite stressors
on individual level (e.g., Coors & De Meester 2008), this is a first study using a mixture of
taxa and several clones to investigate the relationship between the two stressors. Under the
tested experimental conditions (using pesticide concentration found in natural habitats)
parasite exposure was a stronger selection factor than pesticide exposure. However, since
there are often concentration effects of stressors (e.g., Little & Killick 2007; Ben-Ami et al.
2008; Oda et al. 2011), a larger experiment using several pesticide concentrations and spore
loads would better verify whether interaction effects were present. Nevertheless, our study
revealed that parasites, as well as pesticide exposure, alter the structure of Daphnia host
communities.
The observed changes in a Daphnia community are most likely due to varying sensitivity of
the taxa/clones to the biotic and abiotic stressors. Communities exposed to stress lose less-
tolerant taxa and clones, resulting in a decrease of diversity (Altizer et al. 2003; Relyea &
Hoverman 2008). Such a loss in diversity may make the community more vulnerable to
additional stress. Given that parasites are ubiquitous and anthropogenic stressors are
becoming increasingly pervasive, our study shows that the genetic diversity of Daphnia
populations might be at higher risk. Given Daphnia‟s key-role in aquatic food webs,
converting primary production to fish food, this may lead to a higher stress on aquatic
ecosystems.
Acknowledgment
We thank Esther Keller and Markus Möst for helping sampling the aquaria and Christine
Dambone for providing the Daphnia food. The Genetic Diversity Centre at ETH Zurich
allowed us to use their genotyping facility. Further we thank Christoph Tellenbach and Blake
Matthews for intense statistical discussions. The manuscript was substantially improved by
comments from Kayla C. King. This research was funded by the ETH Board (CCES-
GEDIHAP).
References
Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Altizer, S., D. Harvell, and E. Friedle. 2003. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats
to biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:589-596.
Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed
random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59:390-412.
Ben-Ami, F., R. R. Regoes, and D. Ebert. 2008. A quantitative test of the relationship
between parasite dose and infection probability across different host-parasite
combinations. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 275:853-859.
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
55
Berenos, C., K. M. Wegner, and P. Schmid-Hempel. 2011. Antagonistic coevolution with
parasites maintains host genetic diversity: An experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol.
Sci. 278:218-224.
Blanck, H., and S. A. Wangberg. 1988. Induced community tolerance in marine periphyton
established under arsenate stress. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:1816-1819.
Brede, N., C. Sandrock, D. Straile, T. Jankowski, P. Spaak, B. Streit, and K. Schwenk. 2009.
The impact of human-made ecological changes on the genetic architecture of Daphnia
species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:4758-4763.
Brede, N., A. Thielsch, C. Sandrock, P. Spaak, B. Keller, B. Streit, and K. Schwenk. 2006.
Microsatellite markers for European Daphnia. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6:536-539.
Bronmark, C., and L. A. Hansson. 2002. Environmental issues in lakes and ponds: Current
state and perspectives. Environ. Conserv. 29:290-307.
Caceres, C. E., S. R. Hall, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, C. Helmle, and S. MacIntyre. 2006.
Physical structure of lakes constrains epidemics in Daphnia populations. Ecology
87:1438-1444.
Chu, F. L. E., and R. C. Hale. 1994. Relationship between pollution and susceptibility to
infectious-disease in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Environ. Res.
38:243-256.
Combes, C. 1996. Parasites, biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Biodivers. Conserv. 5:953-
962.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple
stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. J.
Appl. Ecol. 45:1820-1828.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2011. Fitness and virulence of a bacterial endoparasite in an
environmentally stressed crustacean host. Parasitology 138:122-131.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Coors, A., J. Vanoverbeke, T. De Bie, and L. De Meester. 2009. Land use, genetic diversity
and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol.
95:71-79.
Crawley, M. J. 2007. The R Book. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Decaestecker, E., S. Declerck, L. De Meester, and D. Ebert. 2005. Ecological implications of
parasites in natural Daphnia populations. Oecologia 144:382-390.
Duffy, M. A., Brassil, C. E., Hall, S. R., Tessier, A. J., Cáceres, C. E. & Conner, J. K. 2008.
Parasite-mediated disruptive selection in a natural Daphnia population. BMC Evol.
Biol. 8:1-9.
Duffy, M. A., and S. R. Hall. 2008. Selective predation and rapid evolution can jointly
dampen effects of virulent parasites on Daphnia populations. Am. Nat. 171:499-510.
Duffy, M. A., J. M. Housley, R. M. Penczykowski, C. E. Caceres, and S. R. Hall. 2011.
Unhealthy herds: Indirect effects of predators enhance two drivers of disease spread.
Funct. Ecol.
Duffy, M. A., and L. Sivars-Becker. 2007. Rapid evolution and ecological host-parasite
dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 10:44-53.
Duncan, A. B., and T. J. Little. 2007. Parasite-driven genetic change in a natural population of
Daphnia. Evolution 61:796-803.
Ebert, D., M. Lipsitch, and K. L. Mangin. 2000. The effect of parasites on host population
density and extinction: Experimental epidemiology with Daphnia and six
microparasites. Am. Nat. 156:459-477.
Folt, C. L., C. Y. Chen, M. V. Moore, and J. Burnaford. 1999. Synergism and antagonism
among multiple stressors. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44:864-877.
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
56
Fritz, R. S., C. M. Nicholsorians, and S. J. Brunsfeld. 1994. Interspecific hybridization of
plants and resistance to herbivores - Hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a
diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106-117.
Gendron, A. D., D. J. Marcogliese, S. Barbeau, M. S. Christin, P. Brousseau, S. Ruby, D. Cyr,
and M. Fournier. 2003. Exposure of leopard frogs to a pesticide mixture affects life
history characteristics of the lungworm Rhabdias ranae. Oecologia 135:469-476.
Green, J. 1974. Parasites and epibionts of Cladoceran. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 32:417-515.
Hall, S. R., M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity of
daphniid parasitism within lakes. Oecologia 143:635-644.
Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282-290.
Hanazato, T. 2001. Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: An ecological perspective.
Environ. Pollut. 112:1-10.
Hanazato, T., and S. I. Dodson. 1995. Synergistic, effects of low oxygen concentration,
predator kairomone, and a pesticide on the cladoceran Daphnia pulex. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 40:700-709.
Hanazato, T., and M. Yasuno. 1987. Effects of a carbamate insecticide, carbaryl, on the
summer phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in ponds. Environ. Pollut.
48:145-159.
Hudson, P., and J. Greenman. 1998. Competition mediated by parasites: Biological and
theoretical progress. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:387-390.
Jokela, J., C. M. Lively, M. F. Dybdahl, and J. A. Fox. 2003. Genetic variation in sexual and
clonal lineages of a freshwater snail. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79:165-181.
Keller, B., J. Wolinska, M. Manca, and P. Spaak. 2008. Spatial, environmental and
anthropogenic effects on the taxa composition of hybridizing Daphnia. Philos. trans.
R. Soc.
King, K. C., J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively. 2011. Trematode parasites infect or die in snail
hosts. Biol. Lett. 7:265-268.
King, K. C., J. D. McLaughlin, M. Boily, and D. J. Marcogliese. 2010. Effects of agricultural
landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biol. Conserv. 143:302-
310.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Kreutz, L. C., L. J. G. Barcellos, A. Marteninghe, E. D. dos Santos, and R. Zanatta. 2010.
Exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate or atrazine-based herbicides alters
the phagocytic function and increases the susceptibility of silver catfish fingerlings
(Rhamdia quelen) to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol.
29:694-697.
Lampert, W. 1978. A field study on the dependence of the fecundity of Daphnia spec. on food
concentration. Oecologia 36:363-369.
Little, T., and S. C. Killick. 2007. Evidence for a cost of immunity when the crustacean
Daphnia magna is exposed to the bacterial pathogen Pasteuria ramosa. Ecology
76:1202-1207.
Lohr, J. N., M. B. Yin, and J. Wolinska. 2010. Prior residency does not always pay off - Co-
infections in Daphnia. Parasitology 137:1493-1500.
Marcogliese, D. J., and M. Pietrock. 2011. Combined effects of parasites and contaminants on
animal health: Parasites do matter. Trends Parasitol. 27:123-130.
Miles, J. R. W., and C. R. Harris. 1978. Insecticide residues in water, sediment, and fish of
drainage system of Holland marsh, Ontario, Canada, 1972-75. J. Econ. Entomol.
71:125-131.
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
57
Montero-Pau, J., A. Gomez, and J. Munoz. 2008. Application of an inexpensive and high-
throughput genomic DNA extraction method for the molecular ecology of
zooplanktonic diapausing eggs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 6:218-222.
Oda, S., Y. Kato, H. Watanabe, N. Tatarazako, and T. Iguchi. 2011. Morphological changes
in Daphnia galeata induced by a crustacean terpenoid hormone and its analogs.
Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 30:232-238.
Pedersen, J. A., M. A. Yeager, and I. H. Suffet. 2006. Organophosphorus insecticides in
agricultural and residential runoff: Field observations and implications for total
maximum daily load development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:2120-2127.
Petrusek, A., J. Seda, J. Machácek, Ruthová, and P. Smilauer. 2008. Daphnia hybridization
along ecological gradients in pelagic environments: The potential for the presence of
hybrid zones in plankton. Philos. trans. R. Soc. 363:2931-2941.
Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer.
Relyea, R. A. 2003. Predator cues and pesticides: A double dose of danger for amphibians.
Ecol. Appl. 13:1515-1521.
Relyea, R. A., and J. T. Hoverman. 2008. Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on
aquatic communities. Oikos 117:1647-1658.
Rohr, J. R., A. M. Schotthoefer, T. R. Raffel, H. J. Carrick, N. Halstead, J. T. Hoverman, C.
M. Johnson, L. B. Johnson, C. Lieske, M. D. Piwoni, P. K. Schoff, and V. R. Beasley.
2008. Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species.
Nature 455:1235-1240.
Sanchez, M., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, and E. Andreu-Molinar. 1998. Evaluation of a
Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ. Sci. Health
Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 33:785-797.
Sih, A., A. M. Bell, and J. L. Kerby. 2004. Two stressors are far deadlier than one. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 19:274-276.
Singer, H., S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Luck, J. Hollender, and A. C. Alder. 2010. Determination of
biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass
spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water. Environ. Pollut.
158:3054-3064.
Stirnadel, H. A., and D. Ebert. 1997. Prevalence, host specificity and impact on host fecundity
of microparasites and epibionts in three sympatric Daphnia species. J. Anim. Ecol.
66:212-222.
Wittmer, I. K., H. P. Bader, R. Scheidegger, H. Singer, A. Luck, I. Hanke, C. Carlsson, and C.
Stamm. 2010. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide
dynamics in surface waters. Water Res. 44:2850-2862.
Wolinska, J., S. Giessler, and H. Koerner. 2009. Molecular identification and hidden diversity
of novel Daphnia parasites from European lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7051-
7059.
Wolinska, J., and K. C. King. 2009. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite
interactions. Trends Parasitol. 25:236-244.
Wolinska, J., J. Seda, H. Koerner, P. Smilauer, and A. Petrusek. 2011. Spatial variation of
Daphnia parasite load within individual water bodies. J. Plankton Res. 33:1284-1294.
Wolinska, J., and P. Spaak. 2009. The cost of being common: Evidence from natural Daphnia
populations. Evolution 63:1893-1901.
Yin, M., C. Laforsch, J. N. Lohr, and J. Wolinska. 2011. Predator-induced defence makes
Daphnia more vulnerable to parasites. Evolution 65:1482-1488.
Yin, M. B., J. Wolinska, and S. Gieler. 2010. Clonal diversity, clonal persistence and rapid
taxon replacement in natural populations of species and hybrids of the Daphnia
longispina complex. Mol. Ecol. 19:4168-4178.
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
58
Web appendix
S1: Sub-lethal effects of diazinon on Daphnia galeata
Material & Methods
We explored sub-lethal effects of diazinon on two Daphnia galeata clones following the
OECD guidelines for reproductive test (OECD/OCDE 1998). We tested five different
concentrations of diazinon (0.00256, 0.0064, 0.016, 0.04 and 0.1 µg/L). As controls, we used
1) lake water without diazinon and 2) lake water without diazinon but containing the same
amount of the solvent acetone as in the treatments. Nominal exposure concentrations of
diazinon were verified with LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/ mass
spectrometry) as described in Kretschmann et al. (2011). As measured diazinon
concentrations were within ± 20 % of the nominal concentrations, for data analysis nominal
concentrations were used. We distributed the offspring (<24 h old) of the third clutch singly in
50 mL jars with five different diazinon concentrations and two controls. Each treatment was
replicated 10 times, resulting in 140 experimental units (7 concentrations × 2 clones × 10
replicates). Under experimental conditions (20 °C, 16:8 light-dark photoperiod) the medium
was changed every third day and the Daphnia were fed with 1 mg C/L of the algae
Scenedesmus. The following parameters were recorded: survival after 21 days (experiment
was terminated then), time of first offspring released and number and body size of the
offspring of the first clutch.
To test for differences in the life history traits we conducted a univariate ANOVA using SPSS
19.0 with the life history trait (number of survived individuals, time of first offspring released
and number and body size of the released offspring as dependent factor, the different diazinon
concentrations as a fixed factor and clones as a random factor. All data were tested for the
assumptions of parametric tests (inspected with q-q plots and plots of residual against fitted
values) and, if necessary, transformed. The two sided Dunnett t-test treats one group as a
control and compares all other groups against it. From that we were able to figure out which
concentrations are different from the control and, consequently, determine the threshold
concentration.
Results
Different diazinon concentrations significantly affected survival rate (F= 13.35, df= 6,
p= 0.003), the number of offspring (F= 6.68, df= 6, p= 0.018), the size of offspring (F =4.66,
df =6, p =0.042) and the time of first offspring released (F= 5.79, df= 6, p= 0.025). We found
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
59
a clone effect on the average offspring size (F= 45.19, df= 1, p< 0.001) and the number of
offspring of the first clutch (F= 7.386, df= 1, p= 0.030).
Survival was only affected at the concentrations 0.016µg/L and 0.1µg/L. The time to release
the first juveniles was delayed and the number of offspring in the first clutch decreased when
the concentration was equal to or higher than 0.04µg/L (first juveniles released: 0.04 µg/L
(p= 0.024), 0.1 µg/L (p<0.001); number of offspring in first clutch: 0.04 µg/L (p= 0.003),
0.1 µg/L (p= 0.015)).
Fig. S1: The effect of different diazinon concentrations on survival rate (A), the number (B) and the time of
offspring of the first clutch released (C) and the size of offspring of the first clutch (D).
Conclusions
For further experiments the diazinon concentration of 0.1 µg/L was chosen. This
concentrations was above the threshold and showed significant differences compared to the
control for all measured traits.
Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors Chapter 4
60
S2: Degradation of diazinon under experimental conditions
Material & Methods
Measurements of diazinon degradation was carried out with 14C labelled diazinon
([Pyrimidinyl-6-14C]-Diazinon, 99.21 % radiochemical purity, supplied by American
Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, USA) under the same experimental conditions (20 °C,
16:8 light-dark photoperiod) and in the same room as the main experiment itself. Eight litre of
lake water (filtered through a membrane of 0.45µl) were filled into a 20 litre aquaria and
5 µg/L 14C labelled diazinon was added (concentration high enough to be measured with the
method described and below the limit of the permitted maximum dose 20 kBq). During
14 days, water samples (1 mL) were taken every 1 to 2 days and 10 mL of Ecosicint A
cintillation cocktail (National Diagnostics, Hessle, UK) immediately added to a water
subsample. Following the protocol of Ashauer et al. (2006), radioactivity was quantified with
liquid scintillation counting (Beckman LS6000 TA Liquid Scintillation Counter, Beckman
Instruments Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) and blank controls were used to correct for background
activity.
Results
Measured diazinon concentrations over 14 days as well as the best fit function is shown in
Fig. S2. Diazinon is degrading 2.8 % per day.
Fig. S2: Degradation rate of 14C labelled diazinon during 14 days. Best fitted regression line and it‟s equation
are included in the graph.
Chapter 4 Competing taxa exposed to multiple stressors
61
Conclusions
To compensate for that loss, a corresponding amount of diazinon/acetone was added to the
aquaria every 2nd
week.
Acknowledgments
We thank Roman Ashauer and Andreas Kretschmann for helpful advices and measuring the
diazinon concentrations.
Reference supplementary material
Ashauer, R., A. Boxall, and C. Brown. 2006. Uptake and elimination of chlorpyrifos and
pentachlorophenol into the freshwater amphipod Gammarus pulex. Arch. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 51:542-548.
Kretschmann, A., R. Ashauer, T. G. Preuss, P. Spaak, B. I. Escher, and J. Hollender. 2011.
Toxicokinetic model describing bioconcentration and biotransformation of diazinon in
Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:4995-5002.
OECD/OCDE. 1998. OECD Guidlines for testing of chemicals, Daphnia magna, reproduction
test.21.
62
63
Chapter 5
Evolutionary and environmental effects of pesticide exposure on
parasite fitness and virulence
Claudia C. Buser, Justyna Wolinska & Piet Spaak
(Journal of Evolutionary Biology, in review)
Abstract
Parasite fitness and virulence can be altered by the environment, especially if conditions
persist for several parasite generations. In this study, we compared the evolutionary and
environmental effects of pesticide exposure to parasite fitness and virulence using the
planktonic crustacean Daphnia galeata and the yeast Metschnikowia sp. Environmental
effects of pesticide exposure resulted in host genotype specific interactions concerning
parasite spore load. Additionally, host fecundity was reduced. Under evolutionary pressure of
pesticide exposure, parasites evolved towards higher spore loads and lower virulence. Since
the concentration of pesticides reflected natural concentrations, our results indicate that
pesticide pollution might have an important impact on disease dynamics in aquatic systems.
Key words
Daphnia, experimental evolution, Metschnikowia sp., parasite, pesticide
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
64
Introduction
The effect of the environment on host-parasite interactions depends on the sensitivity of hosts
to particular environmental conditions. Consequently, parasite fitness (measured, for example,
as infection rate and/or spore load: Ebert 1998; Jensen et al. 2006; Vale & Little 2009) and
virulence (measured as mortality of infected hosts and/or host sterilisation: Garnick 1992;
Poulin & Combes 1999; Alizon et al. 2009) depend on the environment in which the host is
living.
Parasite fitness can increase in stressful host environments due to reduced host immune
function (Sheldon & Verhulst 1996; Moret & Schmid-Hempel 2000). Empirical studies have
shown that stressed hosts are more frequently infected (Chu & Hale 1994; Oppliger et al.
1998; Rohr et al. 2008a) and parasites have higher spore production (Bedhomme et al. 2004;
Yin et al. 2011). Conversely, other studies have shown that parasites experience a fitness loss
when hosts are stressed, due to reduced resources available for parasite growth (Pulkkinen &
Ebert 2004; Tschirren et al. 2007; Hall et al. 2009). Parasite virulence can also be further
influenced by all variety of environmental conditions (reviewed in Thomas & Blanford 2003;
Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009). Generally, in environments which are
stressful for hosts, parasite virulence increases, as observed under higher host mortality rates
(Jokela et al. 1999; Coors & De Meester 2011).
The impact of environmental changes on parasite evolution could be especially important if
the altered conditions persist for several parasite generations. Aquatic habitats in particular are
extensively impacted by human activity, in ways that may affect the evolution of parasites.
For example, pesticide runoff from agriculture into water bodies is likely to select for fast-
growing, early-transmitted parasites (Mennerat et al. 2010) to overcome a short host life span
(Nidelet et al. 2009). Indeed, for obligate killers, parasite virulence can evolve to increase
when extrinsic host mortality is high (Ebert & Weisser 1997). Pesticides have been shown to
affect parasite fitness and virulence across many host-parasite systems; for example, in
parasites of amphibians (Gendron et al. 2003; Rohr et al. 2008b; King et al. 2010), fish
(Kreutz et al. 2010), oysters (Chu & Hale 1994) or planktonic crustaceans (Coors & De
Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Coors et al. 2009; Coors & De Meester 2011). However, the
evolutionary consequences of long-lasting host exposure to pesticides on parasite fitness and
virulence have not been studied in great detail.
In the present study, we investigated environmental and evolutionary effects of host exposure
to pesticides on parasite fitness and virulence. We used the planktonic crustacean
Daphnia galeata (G. O. Sars, 1863) and the yeast Metschnikowia sp. (family:
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
65
Hemiascomycetes; Wolinska et al. 2009) as a host-parasite model system. Needle-like
ascospores accumulate in the body cavity and are released only after host death (Green 1974).
As a stressor, we applied diazinon, which is a commonly used pesticide (Konstantinou et al.
2006; Singer et al. 2010). Standard toxicological tests on D. magna showed that
environmental effects of diazinon exposure cause a delay in reproduction and earlier death, as
well as a decrease in offspring number and body size (Sanchez et al. 1998). D. magna is a
pond species whereas D. galeata inhabits large, permanent lakes (e.g., Keller et al. 2008;
Petrusek et al. 2008; Yin et al. 2010). Such habitats are frequently affected by pesticide
pollution (e.g., Konstantinou et al. 2006; Relyea & Hoverman 2006). Moreover, lake Daphnia
population are commonly infected by a variety of parasite species; with the parasites used in
the present study, Metschnikowia sp., being particularly common (Caceres et al. 2006; Duffy
et al. 2010; Wolinska et al. 2011). Metschnikowia sp. reduces D. galeata reproduction and life
span (Lohr et al. 2010). In addition, parasite fitness (i.e. infectivity and spore production) is
higher in D. galeata exposed to a natural stressor (a predator signal, Yin et al. 2011).
However, the effect of diazinon or any other pollutant on Metschnikowia sp. is not known.
Pesticide exposure has been already shown to increase parasite infectivity (Coors & De
Meester 2008, 2011), but to conversely decrease parasite spore load (Coors & De Meester
2011) in the D. magna-Pasteuria ramosa bacteria system. However, the above mentioned
studies investigated only the environmental effect of pesticide exposure over a maximum of
21 days. Here, we studied both the environmental and the evolutionary effects of pesticide
exposure on parasite fitness and virulence. We expected that parasites raised on hosts exposed
to the pesticide for several generations would evolve adaptations to that stressor, showing
higher infectivity and spore production than the parasites which has been raised in a control
treatment, when environmental effect of the pesticide was tested.
Material and Methods
Origin and care of the host-parasite system and the pesticide
Two different Daphnia galeata clones were selected from a larger collection of clones
isolated in 2008 from the lake Ammersee in Germany (clone_10 and clone_66; taxon and
multilocus genotype assignment were based on 15 microsatellite loci, for methods see Yin et
al. 2010) and used as the experimental hosts. The clones were kept under standard laboratory
conditions (20 °C, 16:8 light-dark photoperiod, fed with 1.0 mg CL-1
of the green algae
Scenedesmus obliquus) for two years. The horizontally-transmitted yeast Metschnikowia sp.
was isolated from the same lake, also in 2008 (Yin et al. 2011) and used as model parasite.
Before the experiment, Metschnikowia sp. isolate was raised for 99 days in independent ten
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
66
experimental Daphnia communities (starting with a mixture of three D. galeata and three
D. galeata × longispina clones isolated from Ammersee, including clone_10 and clone_66).
The Daphnia communities were set up in ten 20L aquaria containing lake water filtered
through a membrane of 0.45µL. In five of those aquaria, Daphnia were exposed to the sub-
lethal dose of diazinon (CAS 333 41 5, 99.5 % purity, Ultra Scientific Analytical Solution N.,
Kingstown RI, USA), 0.1μg/L (similar diazinon concentrations have been measured in natural
systems; e.g. Konstantinou et al. 2006; Wittmer et al. 2010). In the other five aquaria, which
served as a control, Daphnia were exposed to the corresponding amount of the solvent
acetone. After day 99, only two D. galeata clones (clone_47 and clone_66) remained whereas
clone_10 disappeared in both treatments (Claudia C. Buser, Piet Spaak & Justyna Wolinska,
unpublished data). For the two experimental spore solutions, a mixture of heavily-infected
Daphnia collected from each aquaria of the corresponding treatment (i.e., with or without
diazinon) were ground up.
Experimental set-up and procedures
We conducted a life-history experiment with a fully crossed design, in which parasites
(Metschnikowia sp.) were raised for 99 days either on a host community exposed to diazinon
(hereafter referred to as PD: parasite-diazinon), or on a host community exposed to control
conditions (PC: parasite-control). In addition to using these two different parasite sources (PD
or PC), experimental Daphnia were either exposed to diazinon or to the solvent acetone
(control). This resulted in twelve experimental treatments: 2 (host clone) × 3 (parasite history:
PD, PC and no parasites: noP) × 2 (diazinon and no diazinon). The four treatments not
exposed to parasite spores were replicated 10 times, whilst the other eight treatments were
replicated 20 times, for a total of 200 experimental units.
Experimental Daphnia (younger than 24h, third brood of second generation) were kept
individually in 5 mL lake water with or without diazinon. On day 5, 80 individuals (40 from
each clone) were exposed to the parasites raised with diazinon (PD), and 80 to parasites raised
without diazinon (PC), while the remaining 40 animals were inoculated with the appropriate
amount of uninfected crushed Daphnia (noP), to avoid possible bacteria or alarm cue effects.
The concentration of spores in the parasite treatments was 450 spores/mL (similar as in Duffy
& Sivars-Becker 2007). Daphnia were fed daily with 1.0 mg CL-1
S. obliquus except on day 7
and 9, when no food was added to promote spore uptake (Hall et al. 2007). On day 8, 5 mL of
fresh diazinon or control medium was added, and on day 10, the Daphnia were transferred to
30 mL of the corresponding medium. From then on, the media was changed every third day
throughout the experiment. Juveniles were counted and removed daily. The body length (from
top of the eye to beginning of the spine) of three juveniles was measured from the first clutch
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
67
of each female. Dead Daphnia were ground up and the number of spores was determined
under a stereo microscope as described in Lohr et al. (2010), using a Bürker counting
chamber. The experiment lasted 44 days until all animals had died.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0. Twenty-eight individuals died
before day 10 (i.e., when infections first became visible) and were excluded from the
analyses. Differences in parasite infectivity were analysed using a generalized linear model,
and parasite spore load per lifetime was analysed using ANOVA; with diazinon (no/yes),
parasite history (PD/PC) and clonal identity as fixed factors. In the ANOVA analyses of host
life-history traits (survival, total number of juveniles, age at reproduction and 1st clutch
juvenile size), the same fixed factors were used with the exception that parasite treatment
included the third level (i.e. noP: no parasites, in addition to PD/PC), and only infected
animals were included in the parasite-exposure treatments. A Tukey HSD test was used to
determine if PD and PC treatments differed. All data were tested for the assumptions of
normality and, if necessary, transformed using the Rankit function (Conover & Iman 1982).
Results
Parasite fitness traits. Neither parasite history (PD, PC; i.e. evolutionary effects), nor
diazinon presence in the Daphnia medium (i.e. environmental effects), had a significant
influence on parasite infectivity (Fig. 1a). However, there was a main effect of clone, with
clone_66 being more frequently infected than clone_10 (Table 1; Fig. 1). Parasite spore load
was affected by evolutionary effects of diazinon exposure: spore load was higher when
Daphnia was exposed to parasites raised with diazinon (PD) than in Daphnia exposed to
parasites raised in control media (PC; Fig. 1b). Although there was no direct environmental
effect of diazinon exposure, parasite spore load was higher under diazinon exposure for
clone_66, whereas for clone_10 parasite spore load was higher without diazinon exposure
(see significant diazinon × clone interaction; Table 1).
Host traits to determine parasite virulence. Infection generally reduced Daphnia survival
(Fig. 2a, Table 1). However, Daphnia exposed to parasites evolved under diazinon exposure
(PD) died later than Daphnia exposed to parasites evolved under control conditions (PC);
Tukey test: p= 0.001. Environmental diazinon exposure did not affect Daphnia survival, but
the uninfected clone_66 died earlier in the diazinon treatment (parasite exposure × diazinon ×
clone interaction; Table 1).
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
68
Similarly, the production of juveniles was also reduced in the parasite-exposed Daphnia (Fig.
2b, Table 1). The evolutionary effect was important here as well: Daphnia exposed to
parasites evolved under diazinon exposure (PD) produced more offspring than those exposed
to parasites evolved under control conditions (PC); Tukey test: p= 0.02. Environmental
diazinon exposure resulted in lower production of offspring by the uninfected clone_66,
whereas uninfected clone_10 produced more offspring then (parasite exposure × diazinon ×
clone interaction; Table 1). This result reflects the clonal differences concerning survival (see
above).
Other host traits. Neither the reproductive age of Daphnia, nor the size of juveniles was
dependent on evolutionary or environmental effects of diazinon exposure (Table 1). However,
Fig. 1: Reaction norms (mean ±
SE) of parasite fitness traits (A:
proportion infected, B: spore
load) when exposed to parasite
raised with diazinon (PD) or
parasite raised in control media
(PC) for clone_10 (black circles)
and clone_66 (grey triangles).
Fig. 2: Reaction norms (mean
± SE) of host traits (A:
survival, B: total number of
juveniles, C: age at first
reproduction, D: juvenile size)
when exposed to parasite
raised with diazinon (PD),
parasite raised in control
media (PC) or no parasite
(noP) for clone_10 (black
circles) and clone_66 (grey
triangles).
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
69
there were clonal differences for both traits: clone_10 reproduced earlier (Fig. 2c) and
produced smaller juveniles (Fig. 2d), but the difference in size disappeared in juveniles from
infected mothers (parasite exposure × clone interaction; Table 1).
Table 1: Results of a generalized linear modela and several ANOVA‟s
b describing the influence of parasite,
medium and clone identity on the different dependent variables.
Dependent variable Source df X2a/F
b p
Parasite infectivity parasite history (PH) 1 0.358 0.550
diazinon (D) 1 0.124 0.725
clone (C) 1 3.981 0.046
PH × D 1 0.246 0.620
PH × C 1 0.033 0.856
D × C 1 0.056 0.813
PH × D × C 1 0.273 0.601
Parasite spore load parasite history (PH) 1 13.212 <0.001
diazinon (D) 1 1.136 0.289
clone (C) 1 0.105 0.747
PH × D 1 0.371 0.544
PH × C 1 2.470 0.119
D × C 1 7.592 0.007
PH × D × C 1 0.030 0.864
Survival parasite exposure (PE) 2 56.093 <0.001c
diazinon (D) 1 0.490 0.485
clone (C) 1 2.728 0.101
PE × D 2 0.704 0.496
PE × C 2 2.600 0.077
D × C 1 0.010 0.920
PE × D × C 2 3.328 0.038
Total no. of juveniles parasite exposure (PE) 2 51.282 <0.001c
diazinon (D) 1 5.325 0.022
clone (C) 1 41.014 <0.001
PE × D 2 0.199 0.820
PE × C 2 0.589 0.556
D × C 1 0.011 0.915
PE × D × C 2 4.424 0.014
Age at reproduction parasite exposure (PE) 2 0.432 0.650
diazinon (D) 1 0.873 0.352
clone (C) 1 19.164 <0.001
PE × D 2 0.003 0.997
PE × C 2 0.339 0.713
D × C 1 0.131 0.718
PE × D × C 2 2.324 0.102
1st clutch juvenile size parasite exposure (PE) 2 0.088 0.916
diazinon (D) 1 2.782 0.098
clone (C) 1 4.942 0.028
PE × D 2 0.216 0.806
PE × C 2 3.883 0.023
D × C 1 2.376 0.126
PE × D × C 2 0.461 0.632 c PC and PD differ (Tukey test: for exact p-values see the main text)
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
70
Discussion
The parasite strains that were confronted with long-lasting diazinon exposure (PD) produced
significantly more spores than those raised on a host community exposed to control
conditions (PC). In contrast, such an effect was not observed under environmental (short-
lasting) exposure to pesticides. Apparently, the parasites had evolved during the long-lasting,
pre-culturing conditions. Although in our study the parasites were evolving on host
communities originally consisting of six different clones, by the end of the 99 days only two
clones (clone 66 and 47) were left. However, as the clonal composition of experimental host
communities did not differ between the communities exposed and unexposed to pesticides
(Claudia C. Buser, Piet Spaak & Justyna Wolinska, unpublished data), we are confident that
the observed evolutionary effects are due to the pesticide treatment and not due to clonal
differences. Therefore, diazinon might have selected for parasite genotypes with high spore
production in the pre-culturing conditions. Indeed, the parasite selection experiment for either
pesticide or control conditions was likely to be started with a mixture of parasite strains. This
is because a parasite was originally isolated from a field-infected Daphnia. Co-infections with
multiple strains and species are a rule and not an exception in nature (e.g., Read & Taylor
2001), and Daphnia are often co-infected by several strains of a given parasite taxon (Ben-
Ami 2008). Similarly to our results, an increase in parasite reproductive success was
commonly observed in the field of parasite control. For example, it was suggested that drug
therapy should eventually lead to more fertile nematodes (i.e., higher parasite fitness), and
therefore can act as a selection pressure on parasite evolution (Leignel & Cabaret 2001). In
contrast, malaria protozoan parasites adopted reproductive restraint when stressed by drugs
(Reece et al. 2010).
Although there was no main effect of environmental (i.e. short-lasting) diazinon exposure on
parasite spore production, there was a difference between the two tested clones: one clone
produced more spores without pesticide stress, whereas the other clone produced more spores
under diazinon exposure. A similar effect of host genotype-by-environment interaction on
parasite fitness has been detected across other host-parasite systems (reviewed in Wolinska &
King 2009). The other studied parasite fitness trait, infectivity, also differed among the clones,
but was neither affected by evolutionary nor by environmental pesticide exposure. This
suggests that genetics are more important than host physiology, as potentially influenced by
environment (Vale & Little 2009).
Overall, host fitness was reduced due to parasite exposure; infected Daphnia had lower
reproductive output and shorter lifespan (as in Lohr et al. 2010; Yin et al. 2011). However,
parasite virulence differed according to the parasite evolutionary history: parasites that
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
71
evolved with diazinon (PD) were less virulent than parasites raised on a host community not
exposed to diazinon (PC). Hosts infected with PD produced more offspring and had higher
survival. Such long-lasting pesticide exposure leading to evolution of lower virulence
contrasts with most studies testing for environmental effects of pesticide exposure, which
have observed an increased parasite virulence, particularly in Daphnia-microparasite systems
(e.g., Coors et al. 2008; Coors & De Meester 2011). Moreover, an increase in parasite
virulence under conditions stressful for hosts is commonly observed in other systems, also as
a consequence of evolutionary treatment. For example, Mennerat et al. (2010) suggested in
their review that intensive fish farming is likely to select for more virulent parasites.
However, repeatedly used imperfect vaccines do not affect parasite virulence at all (Gandon et
al. 2001; Alizon & van Baalen 2005). Thus, most studies testing for environmental or
evolutionary effects on parasite virulence are contrary to our findings. It could be that the
environmental stressor applied here, diazinon, suppresses the transmission of parasites which
consequently leads to lower virulence (e.g., Frank 1996). Indeed, transmission-blocking
vaccines can select for lower virulence if there is competition among the parasite strains
(Gandon et al. 2001).
Parasite fitness and virulence seem to be interconnected; the later the host dies the longer the
duration of spore production. Also in our experiment, parasites showing an elevated spore
load (the PD parasites) caused less host mortality. Diazinon somehow causes a decoupling of
parasite growth and virulence. The conventional wisdom (avirulence hypothesis) suggests that
lower parasite virulence, and therefore increasing parasite fitness, should be favoured by
natural selection as there is more time to exploit hosts (discussed for example in Anderson &
May 1979; Alizon et al. 2009). Alternatively, the “virulence-transmission trade-off”
hypothesis, in which an increased transmission rate increases virulence is now commonly
accepted (Anderson & May 1982; Ewald 1983). Although our pattern of virulence evolution
is more in line with the avirulence hypothesis, it is still possible that virulence decreases and
transmission rate increases assuming a trade-off between those two traits. Alizon & van
Baalen (2005) modelled that an additional activation of the hosts immune response leads to a
decrease in parasite virulence and increase of transmission rate. It is possible that diazinon
could have activated hosts immune response. Organophosphosphate pesticides have been
shown to affect the immune function of invertebrates, fish, and higher vertebrate wildlife
(reviewed in Galloway & Handy 2003).
Previous work has focused on acute effects of pollution on host and parasite fitness, as well as
on parasite virulence (e.g., Coors & De Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Kreutz et al. 2010).
Here, we additionally considered the evolutionary implications of parasite exposure to
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
72
diazinon (host community exposed for 99 days) by using a mixture of parasite spores from
parasites evolved in five independent experimental lines. We therefore tested for a mean
evolutionary response in the presence/absence of the pesticide. The evolutionary effects of
pesticide exposure (resembling natural concentrations) increased parasite fitness, but
decreased parasite virulence, and might therefore have an important impact on disease
dynamics in aquatic systems. More empirical studies testing the effect of a persistent
environmental stress on parasites would improve our understanding of the evolution of
virulence in nature.
Acknowledgment
We thank Esther Keller and Christine Dambone for assistance in the lab and providing food
for the Daphnia as well as Christoph Tellenbach and Otto Seppälä for statistical advice. The
manuscript was substantially improved by comments from Hanna Hartikainen, Kayla C.
King, Tom Little and Samuel Alizon. This research was funded by the ETH Board (CCES-
GEDIHAP).
References
Alizon, S., A. Hurford, N. Mideo, and M. Van Baalen. 2009. Virulence evolution and the
trade-off hypothesis: History, current state of affairs and the future. J. Evol. Biol.
22:245-259.
Alizon, S., and M. van Baalen. 2005. Emergence of a convex trade-off between transmission
and virulence. Am. Nat. 165:E155-E167.
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1979. Population biology of infectious-diseases. Nature
280:361-367.
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1982. Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology
85:411-426.
Bedhomme, S., P. Agnew, C. Sidobre, and Y. Michalakis. 2004. Virulence reaction norms
across a food gradient. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 271:739-744.
Ben-Ami, F., Mouton, M. and Ebert, D. 2008. The effects of multiple infections on the
expression and evolution of virulence in a Daphnia-endoparasite system. Evolution
62:1700-1711.
Caceres, C. E., S. R. Hall, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, C. Helmle, and S. MacIntyre. 2006.
Physical structure of lakes constrains epidemics in Daphnia populations. Ecology
87:1438-1444.
Chu, F. L. E., and R. C. Hale. 1994. Relationship between pollution and susceptibility to
infectious-disease in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Environ. Res.
38:243-256.
Conover, W. J., and R. L. Iman. 1982. Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation.
Biometrics 38:715-724.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple
stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. J.
Appl. Ecol. 45:1820-1828.
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
73
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2011. Fitness and virulence of a bacterial endoparasite in an
environmentally stressed crustacean host. Parasitology 138:122-131.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Coors, A., J. Vanoverbeke, T. De Bie, and L. De Meester. 2009. Land use, genetic diversity
and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol.
95:71-79.
Duffy, M. A., C. E. Caceres, S. R. Hall, A. J. Tessier, and A. R. Ives. 2010. Temporal, spatial,
and between-host comparisons of patterns of parasitism in lake zooplankton. Ecology
91:3322-3331.
Duffy, M. A., and L. Sivars-Becker. 2007. Rapid evolution and ecological host-parasite
dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 10:44-53.
Ebert, D. 1998. Experimental evolution of parasites. Science 282:1432-1435.
Ebert, D., and W. W. Weisser. 1997. Optimal killing for obligate killers: The evolution of life
histories and virulence of semelparous parasites. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 264:985-
991.
Ewald, P. W. 1983. Host-parasite relations, vectors, and the evolution of disease severity.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14:465-485.
Frank, S. A. 1996. Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71:37-78.
Galloway, T., and R. Handy. 2003. Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides.
Ecotoxicology 12:345-363.
Gandon, S., M. J. Mackinnon, S. Nee, and A. F. Read. 2001. Imperfect vaccines and the
evolution of pathogen virulence. Nature 414:751-756.
Garnick, E. 1992. Parasite virulence and parasite-host coevolution - A reappraisal. J.
Parasitol. 78:381-386.
Gendron, A. D., D. J. Marcogliese, S. Barbeau, M. S. Christin, P. Brousseau, S. Ruby, D. Cyr,
and M. Fournier. 2003. Exposure of leopard frogs to a pesticide mixture affects life
history characteristics of the lungworm Rhabdias ranae. Oecologia 135:469-476.
Green, J. 1974. Parasites and epibionts of Cladoceran. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 32:417-515.
Hall, S. R., J. L. Simonis, R. M. Nisbet, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2009. Resource
ecology of virulence in a planktonic host-parasite system: An explanation using
dynamic energy budgets. Am. Nat. 174:149-162.
Hall, S. R., L. Sivars-Becker, C. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2007.
Eating yourself sick: Transmission of disease as a function of foraging ecology. Ecol.
Lett. 10:207-218.
Jensen, K. H., T. Little, A. Skorping, and D. Ebert. 2006. Empirical support for optimal
virulence in a castrating parasite. PLoS Biology 4:1265-1269.
Jokela, J., C. M. Lively, J. Taskinen, and A. D. Peters. 1999. Effect of starvation on parasite-
induced mortality in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia
119:320-325.
Keller, B., J. Wolinska, M. Manca, and P. Spaak. 2008. Spatial, environmental and
anthropogenic effects on the taxa composition of hybridizing Daphnia. Philos. trans.
R. Soc.
King, K. C., J. D. McLaughlin, M. Boily, and D. J. Marcogliese. 2010. Effects of agricultural
landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biol. Conserv. 143:302-
310.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Environmental-dependent parasite evolution Chapter 5
74
Kreutz, L. C., L. J. G. Barcellos, A. Marteninghe, E. D. dos Santos, and R. Zanatta. 2010.
Exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate or atrazine-based herbicides alters
the phagocytic function and increases the susceptibility of silver catfish fingerlings
(Rhamdia quelen) to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol.
29:694-697.
Lazzaro, B. P., and T. J. Little. 2009. Immunity in a variable world. Philos. trans. R. Soc.
364:15-26.
Leignel, V., and J. Cabaret. 2001. Massive use of chemotherapy influences life traits of
parasitic nematodes in domestic ruminants. Funct. Ecol. 15:569-574.
Lohr, J. N., M. B. Yin, and J. Wolinska. 2010. Prior residency does not always pay off - Co-
infections in Daphnia. Parasitology 137:1493-1500.
Mennerat, A., F. Nilsen, D. Ebert, and A. Skorping. 2010. Intensive farming: Evolutionary
implications for parasites and pathogens. Evol. Biol. 37:59-67.
Moret, Y., and P. Schmid-Hempel. 2000. Survival for immunity: The price of immune system
activation for bumblebee workers. Science 290:1166-1168.
Nidelet, T., J. C. Koella, and O. Kaltz. 2009. Effects of shortened host life span on the
evolution of parasite life history and virulence in a microbial host-parasite system.
BMC Evol. Biol. 9.
Oppliger, A., J. Clobert, J. Lecomte, P. Lorenzon, K. Boudjemadi, and H. B. John-Alder.
1998. Environmental stress increases the prevalence and intensity of blood parasite
infection in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Ecol. Lett. 1:129-138.
Petrusek, A., J. Seda, J. Machácek, Ruthová, and P. Smilauer. 2008. Daphnia hybridization
along ecological gradients in pelagic environments: The potential for the presence of
hybrid zones in plankton. Philos. trans. R. Soc. 363:2931-2941.
Poulin, R., and C. Combes. 1999. The concept of virulence: Interpretations and implications -
Comment. Parasitol. Today 15:474-475.
Pulkkinen, K., and D. Ebert. 2004. Host starvation decreases parasite load and mean host size
in experimental populations. Ecology 85:823-833.
Read, A. F., and L. H. Taylor. 2001. The ecology of genetically diverse infections. Science
292:1099-1102.
Reece, S. E., E. Ali, P. Schneider, and H. A. Babiker. 2010. Stress, drugs and the evolution of
reproductive restraint in malaria parasites. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 277:3123-3129.
Relyea, R., and J. Hoverman. 2006. Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: A review and
synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecol. Lett. 9:1157-1171.
Rohr, J. R., T. R. Raffel, S. K. Sessions, and P. J. Hudson. 2008a. Understanding the net
effects of pesticides on amphibian trematode infections. Ecol. Appl. 18:1743-1753.
Rohr, J. R., A. M. Schotthoefer, T. R. Raffel, H. J. Carrick, N. Halstead, J. T. Hoverman, C.
M. Johnson, L. B. Johnson, C. Lieske, M. D. Piwoni, P. K. Schoff, and V. R. Beasley.
2008b. Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species.
Nature 455:1235-1240.
Sanchez, M., M. D. Ferrando, E. Sancho, and E. Andreu-Molinar. 1998. Evaluation of a
Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J. Environ. Sci. Health
Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes 33:785-797.
Sheldon, B. C., and S. Verhulst. 1996. Ecological immunology: Costly parasite defences and
trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:317-321.
Singer, H., S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Luck, J. Hollender, and A. C. Alder. 2010. Determination of
biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass
spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water. Environ. Pollut.
158:3054-3064.
Chapter 5 Environmental-dependent parasite evolution
75
Thomas, M. B., and S. Blanford. 2003. Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactions. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 18:344-350.
Tschirren, B., L. L. Bischoff, V. Saladin, and H. Richner. 2007. Host condition and host
immunity affect parasite fitness in a bird-ectoparasite system. Funct. Ecol. 21:372-
378.
Vale, P. F., and T. J. Little. 2009. Measuring parasite fitness under genetic and thermal
variation. Heredity 103:102-109.
Wittmer, I. K., H. P. Bader, R. Scheidegger, H. Singer, A. Luck, I. Hanke, C. Carlsson, and C.
Stamm. 2010. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide
dynamics in surface waters. Water Res. 44:2850-2862.
Wolinska, J., S. Giessler, and H. Koerner. 2009. Molecular identification and hidden diversity
of novel Daphnia parasites from European lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7051-
7059.
Wolinska, J., and K. C. King. 2009. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite
interactions. Trends Parasitol. 25:236-244.
Wolinska, J., J. Seda, H. Koerner, P. Smilauer, and A. Petrusek. 2011. Spatial variation of
Daphnia parasite load within individual water bodies. J. Plankton Res. 33:1284-1294.
Yin, M., C. Laforsch, J. N. Lohr, and J. Wolinska. 2011. Predator-induced defence makes
Daphnia more vulnerable to parasites. Evolution 65:1482-1488.
Yin, M. B., J. Wolinska, and S. Gieler. 2010. Clonal diversity, clonal persistence and rapid
taxon replacement in natural populations of species and hybrids of the Daphnia
longispina complex. Mol. Ecol. 19:4168-4178.
76
77
Chapter 6
Environment-dependent virulence affects disease spread in host
populations
Claudia C. Buser & Kayla C. King
(In preparation)
Abstract
Parasite virulence can be mediated by variation in the host environment. Empirical work has
documented the environmental conditions under which virulence is expected to increase or
decrease. However, less attention is given to how condition-dependent virulence affects the
epidemic spread of disease in a host population. Here, we examine epidemiological models in
which parasite virulence (i.e., infected host mortality rate) is environment-dependent. We
explicitly explore how eight qualitatively different relationships between parasite virulence
and environmental quality alter the ability of a parasite to invade in “poor” and “good” host
environments. Our results suggest that these relationships can drastically affect whether
highly virulent parasites can spread in the population. The study highlights the consequences
of environmental quality for epidemics. We further discuss how variation in the shape of the
virulence-environment relationships may also affect the strength of selection on natural host
populations across time and space.
Keywords
Condition-dependent virulence, environment, host-parasite interactions
Environment and disease spread Chapter 6
78
Introduction
The spread of disease epidemics is highly dependent on certain host and parasite traits, such
as reproduction, transmission and virulence (e.g., Anderson & May 1981; Anderson & May
1986). Parasite virulence, which can refer to parasite-induced mortality rate or reduction in
host fitness, may play an especially important role (Frank 1996). Disease dynamics can be
affected by changes in virulence caused by relatedness among infecting strains (Frank 1992,
1996), host population structure (Boots et al. 2004) and parasite transmission mode (Day
2001), for example.
Parasite virulence has also been repeatedly shown to be influenced by environmental variation
in a variety of host-parasite systems (Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009).
However, the effects on virulence differ depending on the environmental factor of interest.
Most empirical data to date show that infected hosts die more in environments where hosts are
stressed in poor conditions: mortality of infected hosts increase because of exposure to near-
starvation conditions (Jokela et al. 1999; Ferguson & Read 2002; Brown et al. 2003; Tseng
2004; Jokela et al. 2005), pesticides (Coors et al. 2008; Coors & De Meester 2011) and high
temperatures (Mitchell & Read 2005). Virulent effects may also be reduced if hosts are better
able to tolerate infection in improved environmental conditions (Vale et al. 2011).
Conversely, when conditions are good, parasites might also induce a higher host mortality
(see "high food" example in Vale et al. 2011). Overall, the relationship between virulence and
environmental quality can take many directions (see additional examples in Thomas &
Blanford 2003) and likely varies among host-parasite interactions. The exact shape of the
relationship, however, over a range of conditions remains largely speculative and untested for
most systems.
Epidemiological models are increasingly integrating the environment to determine how local
conditions affect epidemiology (e.g., Lafferty & Holt 2003; Hall et al. 2007; Hall et al. 2009),
as well as host-parasite coevolution (Mostowy & Engelstaedter 2011). Indeed, theoretical
studies have found that abiotic conditions can accurately describe some host-parasite
population dynamics in nature (e.g., Hall et al. 2006; Hall et al. 2009). However, little is
known of the influence of condition-dependent virulence on the spread of disease in a host
population. Here, we explored how eight different relationships between virulence and
environmental quality alter the ability of a parasite to invade across a gradient of host
conditions.
Chapter 6 Environment and disease spread
79
Model and Results
We use a „classic‟ differential SI model (Anderson & May 1981), with disease-induced
mortality and mass-action transmission, to follow how different functional relationships
between virulence and environmental quality affect the spread of disease across an
environmental gradient (ranging from bad to good). We are interested in virulence from an
ecological perspective, as the immediate effect of parasite infection on host mortality, not as a
parasite trait.
The change in susceptible host (S) and infected host densities (I) was tracked as follows:
(1A)
(1B)
The rate of change in the densities of susceptible hosts (equation 1A) is dependent on the
number of susceptible and infected hosts, the strength of density dependence on birth rate (c),
the birth rate of uninfected and infected hosts (our parasite does not affect birth rate of the
infected animals) (b), the transmission rate (β) and the natural background mortality (d). The
rate of change in densities of infected hosts (equation 1B) depends on transmission rate (β) as
well as host death, as a result of natural background mortality (d) or mortality due to
infection, otherwise known as virulence (α).
We calculate all possible equilibria: dS/dt=dI/dt=0, the equilibrial density of susceptible hosts
with no infected hosts (disease-free or boundary equilibrium, S*bnd) and persisting with
parasites (the endemic or interior equilibrium, S*int):
(2)
To examine the conditions under which disease can spread in a host population, we calculate
R0, the parasite reproductive ratio. This is the expected number of secondary infections
generated from a single infected host individual. Calculating R0 is a standard approach to
analysing similar epidemiological models (Anderson & May 1986).
(3)
dSSIIScISbdt
dS ))(1)((
IdISIdt
dI
bc
dbSbnd
*
dS
*
int
*
int
*
0S
SR bnd
Environment and disease spread Chapter 6
80
Parasites can spread in a population when R0 > 1. As R0 increases, so does disease spread. By
substituting S*bnd and S
*int from equation 2 into equation 3, we see that R0 increases when β
and b are high and c, α and d are low. It is never the case that d > b, which excludes the
possibility of R0 < 0.
(4)
We assume our environment (E) varies between 0 (“bad”) and 1 (“good”) and affects birth
rate (equation 5) in a positive linear fashion. As the quality of environment improves (as E
approaches 1), more resources are available for reproduction. Therefore, br is the innate birth
rate in an ideal, good environment.
(5)
We set environmental conditions to alter virulence/the mortality rates of infected hosts (α) in
eight mutually exclusive functional relationships (see also Fig. 1):
(6)
We set the following parameters: β= 0.001, c= 0.01 and d= 0.01. The reference birth rate of
hosts (br) is 0.9. Five levels of peak reference parasite virulence are examined to explore
parameter space between 0.01 and 0.2 (1-20 % of infected animals die at peak virulence).
Values of α vary from 0 to αr. As a reminder, the influence of the environment on R0 depends
dbc
dbR
)0
Ebb r
Er 1
32 Er
)816(31
E
r
e
Er 14
35 Err
81661 E
rr
e
)-(14 r7 EE
rr8 +1)-(4 EE
Chapter 6 Environment and disease spread
81
on how the environment affects the ability of the parasite to harm the host or on the ability of
the host to resist the parasite. Virulence may increase as the availability of more host
resources can boost parasite exploitation rates (α1: positive linear, α2: positive cube root,
α3: positive sigmoidal). In contrast, virulence may decrease in a good environment from
higher host resistance/tolerance and less conflict over shared resources (α4: negative linear, α5:
negative cube root, α6: negative sigmoidal). Some parasites may have a fitness optimum in an
intermediate environment (α7: negative quadratic). However, others may be successful in a
bad environment because of weakened host resistance (Coors et al. 2008; Rohr et al. 2008)
and also in a good environment as hosts may have higher resource levels to exploit (Seppälä
et al. 2008; α8: positive quadratic).
Fig. 1: Relationships between virulence and host environmental quality, from “bad” to “good”. Environmental
conditions can have a (a) linear, (b) cube root, (c) sigmoidal, or (d) quadratic relationship with virulence.
Environment and disease spread Chapter 6
82
We delineate changes in the reproductive ratio (R0) with environment (E) by calculating the
partial derivative. Changes in R0 with environmental quality depend on two components:
(7)
Component A encompassed the dependence of birth rate on environmental quality and
component B, the dependence of virulence. With increasing birth rate and virulence,
component A and B become smaller, respectively. As component B increases relative to A
disease spread decreases. To examine the specific changes in R0 with improved environmental
quality, we consider the different functional relationships between virulence and
environmental quality: positive relationship (α1, α2, α3), negative relationship (α4, α5, α6),
intermediate optimum (α7) and intermediate minimum (α8). For α1, α2 and α3, parasite spread
reduces as a consequence of improved environmental conditions (Fig. 2a, b, c). The reduction
in R0 is less pronounced in the positive cube root relationship (α2) (Fig. 2b), but more so in the
positive sigmoidal relationship (α3; Fig. 2c). For the negative virulence-environment
functional relationships (α4, α5 and α6), R0 increases with environmental quality (Fig. 2d, e, f).
Virulence with an intermediate optimum (α7), allows for those parasites to spread in either
poor or pristine environments only (Fig. 2g). Conversely, parasites with minimal virulence in
intermediate environments (α8) are inhibited from spreading in environments of either bad or
good quality (Fig. 2h).
Less virulent parasites were found to spread in all conditions (Fig. 2). However, the ability of
highly virulent parasites (i.e., αr= 0.2) to spread strongly depended on the environmental
conditions and the virulence-environment relationship. Under the positive cube root (α2)
relationship, virulent parasites are barely able to reproduce and transmit in poor environments
and not at all as conditions improved. In poor environments, virulent parasites with a positive
linear (α1), a positive sigmoidal (α3), and a negative quadratic relationship (α7) could spread,
and the positive sigmoidal relationship (α3) resulted in the best conditions for virulent
epidemics. In good environments, however, virulent parasites were successful given negative
relationships (α4, α5, α6) and the negative quadratic relationship (α7). Virulent parasites were
able to spread across the largest range of environments under the positive quadratic
relationship α8, but not under extremely poor or good conditions.
B
Ed
A
E
b
bdb
dR
E
R
110
0
Chapter 6 Environment and disease spread
83
Fig 2.: Spread of parasites (R0) of low to high virulence (five lines from lightest grey to black represent αr =
0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) in “bad” (0) to “good” (1) environmental conditions. Eight relationships between
virulence and environmental quality are shown. Virulence increases with quality – (a) linear, (b) cube root, (c)
sigmoidal – or decreases with quality (d) linear, (e) cube root, (f) sigmoidal. Parasite virulence may also be
highest in intermediate environments (g) negative quadratic, or lowest in intermediate environments (h) positive
quadratic.
Discussion
There is mounting empirical evidence that environmental conditions can play an important
role in mediating host-parasite interactions (Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009).
Our results suggest that while less virulent parasites easily spread over a range of
environments, as virulence increases, parasites depend more on environmental quality and the
conditions under which they can optimally exploit hosts (i.e., virulence-environment
functional relationship). In addition, it is when their virulence is reduced by environmental
conditions that otherwise highly virulent parasites are able to spread. For example, a larger
intensity of disease spread requires low virulence caused by condition-dependence: among
functional relationships α1-α3 (positive relationship), R0 is highest in α3 (positive sigmoidal,
Fig. 2c) because poor environments maintain the lowest levels of virulence. Virulence limits
Environment and disease spread Chapter 6
84
disease spread in the present model, a finding in agreement with other epidemiological
models without a trade-off between virulence and transmission (see Keeling & Rohani 2007),
albeit in a constant environment. However, we show how virulence interacts with the
environment and plays out across a range of environmental conditions.
The best conditions for disease spread may not always be optimal for parasite fitness over the
long term. If parasite virulence has a positive functional relationship with environmental
quality (Fig. 2a-c), epidemics are more likely to occur in a poor environment. The
combination of poor conditions and parasite spread could be devastating for a host population
and suboptimal for parasite fitness, given that bad environmental conditions may additionally
impair other aspects of host health (e.g., growth, maintenance; Strong & James 1993;
Boersma & Vijverberg 1994). Therefore, negative relationships with environment quality
(Fig. 2d-f) may be the most optimal for parasite epidemics in the long term. Indeed, the
majority of studies examining condition-dependent virulence show parasite virulence at its
peak under stressed host conditions (e.g., Jokela et al. 1999; Ferguson & Read 2002; Tseng
2004). As a result, compared to conditions in a laboratory setting which are ideal, parasites
may do more damage to hosts, and thus have greater impact on host populations, in the wild
where hosts experience stressful, natural environmental conditions (Jaenike 1992; Jaenike et
al. 1995).
By mediating the impact of infection on hosts, environmental factors can alter the strength of
parasite-mediated selection (see examples in Lazzaro & Little 2009; Wolinska & King 2009).
Our results suggest a mechanism by which the environment may do this: favour the spread of
virulent parasites in some environments and not others. Environments conferring an
advantage to epidemics of highly virulent parasites may impose stronger selection than those
in which they cannot spread. Under relationship α3 (increasing sigmoidal), for example,
epidemics of virulent parasites can occur in a poor host environment, but are inhibited in a
good host environment (Fig. 2c). In addition, while some relationships yield little change in
R0 across the range of environmental conditions (Fig. 2b, 2g), parasite reproduction can
greatly vary in others (Fig. 2c, 2f, 2h). Rapid changes in the strength of selection may result
from environmental fluctuations or geographic clines depending upon the environment-
virulence relationship. Thus, variation in environmental conditions across populations or
within populations over time may contribute to host-parasite coevolutionary dynamics
(Mostowy & Engelstaedter 2011) or the geographic mosaic of coevolution (Thompson 2005).
Our model makes important predictions of how the interaction between parasite virulence and
environmental condition affects disease spread. It emphasizes the need for studies that
Chapter 6 Environment and disease spread
85
examine the relationship between environmental factors and virulence in natural systems
vulnerable to environmental variation over space or time. Ideal candidates would be
organisms and parasites which interact across seasons or a range of habitats, perhaps even
those that are anthropogenically-degraded.
Acknowledgments
We thank J. Engelstädter, J. Jokela, C. Lively, P. Spaak and especially S. Hall and M.
Kwiatkowski for their advice and support. We acknowledge funding from the ETH Board
(CCES-GEDIHAP to C. Buser), ThinkSwiss (to K. King) and NSERC Canada (to K. King).
Reference
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1981. The population dynamics of microparasites and their
invertebrate hosts. Philos. trans. R. Soc. 291:451-524.
Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1986. The invasion, persistence and spread of infectious-
diseases within animal and plant-communities. Philos. trans. R. Soc. 314:533-570.
Boersma, M., and J. Vijverberg. 1994. Resource depression in Daphnia galeata, Daphnia
cucullata and their interspecific hybrid: Life history consequences. J. Plankton Res.
16:1741-1758.
Boots, M., P. J. Hudson, and A. Sasaki. 2004. Large shifts in pathogen virulence relate to host
population structure. Science 303:842-844.
Brown, M. J. F., R. Schmid-Hempel, and P. Schmid-Hempel. 2003. Strong context-dependent
virulence in a host-parasite system: Reconciling genetic evidence with theory. J.
Anim. Ecol. 72:994-1002.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2011. Fitness and virulence of a bacterial endoparasite in an
environmentally stressed crustacean host. Parasitology 138:122-131.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Day, T. 2001. Parasite transmission modes and the evolution of virulence. Evolution 55:2389-
2400.
Ferguson, H. M., and A. F. Read. 2002. Genetic and environmental determinants of malaria
parasite virulence in mosquitoes. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 269:1217-1224.
Frank, S. A. 1992. A kin selection model for the evolution of virulence. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 250:195-197.
Frank, S. A. 1996. Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71:37-78.
Hall, S. R., C. J. Knight, C. R. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2009.
Qualtity matters: resurce quality for hosts and the timing of epidemics. Ecol. Lett.
12:118-128.
Hall, S. R., L. Sivars-Becker, C. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2007.
Eating yourself sick: Transmission of disease as a function of foraging ecology. Ecol.
Lett. 10:207-218.
Hall, S. R., A. J. Tessier, M. A. Duffy, M. Huebner, and C. E. Cáceres. 2006. Warmer does
not have to mean sicker: Temperature and predators can jointly drive timing of
epidemics. Ecology 87:1684-1695.
Environment and disease spread Chapter 6
86
Jaenike, J. 1992. Mycophagous Drosophila and their nematode parasites. Am. Nat. 139:893-
906.
Jaenike, J., H. Benway, and G. Stevens. 1995. Parasite-induced mortality in mycophagous
Drosophila. Ecology 76:383-391.
Jokela, J., C. M. Lively, J. Taskinen, and A. D. Peters. 1999. Effect of starvation on parasite-
induced mortality in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Oecologia
119:320-325.
Jokela, J., J. Taskinen, P. Mutikainen, and K. Kopp. 2005. Virulence of parasites in hosts
under environmental stress: Experiments with anoxia and starvation. Oikos 108:156-
164.
Keeling, M. J., and P. Rohani. 2007. Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals.
University Press, Princeton.
Lafferty, K. D., and R. D. Holt. 2003. How should environmental stress affect the population
dynamics of disease? Ecol. Lett. 6:654-664.
Lazzaro, B. P., and T. J. Little. 2009. Immunity in a variable world. Philos. trans. R. Soc.
364:15-26.
Mitchell, S. E., and A. F. Read. 2005. Poor maternal environment enhances offspring disease
resistance in an invertebrate. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 272:2601-2607.
Mostowy, R., and J. Engelstaedter. 2011. The impact of environmental change on host-
parasite coevolutionary dynamics Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences B
- Biological Science 278:2283-2292.
Rohr, J. R., T. R. Raffel, S. K. Sessions, and P. J. Hudson. 2008. Understanding the net
effects of pesticides on amphibian trematode infections. Ecol. Appl. 18:1743-1753.
Seppälä, O., K. Liljeroos, A. Karvonen, and J. Jokela. 2008. Host condition as a constraint for
parasite reproduction. Oikos 117:749-753.
Strong, L., and S. James. 1993. Some effects of ivermectin on the yellow dung fly,
Scatophaga-stercoraria. Vet. Parasitol. 48:181-191.
Thomas, M. B., and S. Blanford. 2003. Thermal biology in insect-parasite interactions. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 18:344-350.
Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
Tseng, M. 2004. Sex-specific response of a mosquito to parasites and crowding. Proc. R. Soc.
B. Biol. Sci. 271:S186-S188.
Vale, P. F., A. J. Wilson, A. Best, M. Boots, and T. J. Little. 2011. Epidemiological,
evolutionary, and coevolutionary implications of context-eependent parasitism. Am.
Nat. 177:510-521.
Wolinska, J., and K. C. King. 2009. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite
interactions. Trends Parasitol. 25:236-244.
87
Chapter 7
Concluding remarks and recommendations for future research
Claudia C. Buser
Discussion & Conclusion Chapter 7
88
With this thesis, I aimed to detect pesticide-mediated effects on host-parasite interactions.
Specifically, I examined the influence of pesticide pollution on host and parasite fitness, as
well as virulence, and tested the effect of multiple stressors on host population dynamics and
disease spread.
Firstly, I would like to discuss the effect of pesticide on host fitness and host community
structure without taking parasites into account. I showed that both acute and chronic exposure
to the pesticide diazinon reduced host fitness. By exposing Daphnia to acute effect diazinon
concentrations (Chapter 2), test species and clones varied in survival, and therefore in
sensitivity, towards the toxicant. Also, the exposure to chronic and sub-lethal diazinon
concentrations reduced the number of offspring (Chapter 5), but for only one of the two
clones, pesticides caused higher mortality and lower fecundity. In Chapter 4, I found that the
fecundity of the competing taxa depended on the pesticide: D. galeata was more fecund when
additionally exposed to pesticide whereas the hybrids were more fecund when not exposed.
Pesticides have been previously shown to affect host life-history traits (see for example
Hanazato 2001), but pesticide concentrations used in most experimental tests are often higher
than concentrations found in aquatic systems (Relyea & Hoverman 2006). Thus, I aimed to
use ecologically-relevant diazinon concentrations (e.g., Konstantinou et al. 2006; Wittmer et
al. 2010), and I found that such sub-lethal concentrations drastically reduce host fitness. In
general, variation in response to pesticide exposure can be due to variation in traits, such as
size, mode of respiration, feeding type, habit, and life-cycle duration (Baird & Van den Brink
2007; Rubach et al. 2010), as well as variation in biotransformation processes and in
sensitivity of the target site (e.g., a certain enzyme) inside an organism (Barata et al. 2001).
Additionally, it can be because of adaptation towards the chemical compound (Klerks & Weis
1987). Consistently observing this genetic variation in sensitivity towards the pesticide
diazinon suggests that more than one genotype should be used in toxicology studies. This is
necessary to take into account the variation within and between species and to minimize the
risk of underestimating the effects of a chemical in the wild (Cairns 1984; Chapman 2000).
Differences in the sensitivity of single genotypes to anthropogenic effects can be manifested
at the community level. Pesticides did not reduce host community density, but changed the
genetic structure (Chapter 4), indicating that pesticide-tolerant clones replace sensitive
clones. In the Chapter 4 experiment, pesticide concentrations measured in natural habitats
were able to change the genetic structure of a mesocosm experimental community. Similarly,
Hanazato & Yasuno (1987) observed changes in zooplankton species composition after
Chapter 7 Discussion & Conclusion
89
ecologically-relevant exposure to insecticides, and Relyea & Hovernan (2008) demonstrated
that pesticide exposure lowered zooplankton diversity and abundance in mesocosms. A loss in
diversity, through exposure to a single stressor can highly impact communities making them
more prone to future stressors (Spielman et al. 2004; Reusch et al. 2005). For example,
reductions in genetic diversity may influence host or parasite evolutionary rates (Altizer et al.
2003). A reduction in host population diversity can also increase the risk of getting infected
(Elton 1958; Sherman et al. 1988; Schmid-Hempel 1998; Altermatt & Ebert 2008) or lead to
increased severity in the effects of epidemics on host populations (Duffy & Sivars-Becker
2007; Duffy & Hall 2008; Lively 2010). Furthermore, in a population exposed to pesticides,
resistance towards this chemical compound may evolve. Evolving resistance can be
associated with evolutionary costs and can lead to further synergistic interactions between a
pesticide, and for example, parasite exposure (Jansen et al. 2011).
In this thesis, I further examined whether pesticide exposure affected parasite fitness and
virulence upon single (environmental) or several (evolutionary) host generation exposures to
the pesticide diazinon. In Chapter 3, exposure to the pesticide for one generation increased
virulence. Pesticides has been shown to increase parasite fitness and virulence in several host-
parasite systems; parasites of amphibians (Gendron et al. 2003; Rohr et al. 2008; King et al.
2010), fish (Kreutz et al. 2010), and oysters (Chu & Hale 1994). Also virulence of a bacterial
parasite, Pasteuria ramosa, was demonstrated to increase when it‟s host, Daphnia magna,
was exposed to the pesticide carbaryl (Coors & De Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Coors et
al. 2009; Coors & De Meester 2011). Interestingly, in Chapter 5, whether diazinon exposure
caused lower or higher parasite virulence (i.e., production of host offspring) and/or parasite
fitness (i.e., spore load) was highly dependent on the Daphnia clone infected by the parasite.
In Chapter 5, the evolutionary consequences of long-lasting pesticide exposure on parasite
fitness and virulence were more obvious than the environmental effects due to parasite
evolution. Persistent pesticide exposure over several host generations resulted in higher
parasite fitness (i.e., spore load) and lower virulence (i.e., host mortality rate and host
reproduction). It would be very interesting to test, if the observed decreases in virulence is
stable over time.
In general, parasite virulence is increased when hosts are exposed to pesticides in the short-
term. From our virulence-environment relationships built into the epidemiological model in
Chapter 6, this would correspond with a negative (decreasing) relationship (see Fig. 1d, e or f
in Chapter 6). Following the assumptions of the model, I would expect that disease would be
Discussion & Conclusion Chapter 7
90
less likely to spread in a host population inhabiting an environment of bad quality than in a
population in good condition. Higher background mortality, as well as reduced transmission,
select for parasites to adapt and reduce their virulence (Garnick 1992; Bull 1994; Ebert &
Herre 1996; Frank 1996; Ebert & Weisser 1997; Day 2001). This was observed in Chapter 5,
in which parasites under pesticide stress evolved towards lower virulence, and consequently
higher fitness. Changes in parasite fitness and virulence can have consequences on disease
dynamics, as well as host population dynamics. In Chapter 4, we were not able to detect such
effects likely because the chosen timescale of 3 months was too short. Nevertheless, the
results of Chapter 5, in addition to the simulations of Chapter 6, improve our understanding
of external factors that may affect the evolution of virulence and the spread of disease.
A major goal of thesis was to determine the effect of multiple stressors on host fitness and
community structure and the consequences of pesticide-meditated effects on host-parasite
interactions, as well as the spread of disease. In our studies, a first clear effect of simultaneous
exposure to parasite spores and pesticide was found in Chapter 3: Whereas each stressor
alone did not affected host survival and parasite spores itself were not infectious, I found a
reduced survival of Daphnia by exposure to parasite spores which did not cause infection in
combination with pesticides. It has been shown that a combination of abiotic and biotic
stressors is often more harmful than either stressor alone (e.g., Hanazato & Dodson 1995; Folt
et al. 1999; Relyea 2003; Sih et al. 2004; Marcogliese & Pietrock 2011). The effect of
multiple stressors can be synergistic, antagonistic or additive, varying by response level
(Crain et al. 2008). Mostly synergistic or no effect of simultaneous exposure has been
observed (Holmstrup et al. 2010). In the Daphnia-endoparasite system clear interactions
between pesticide and parasites were found, namely increased host mortality and host
castration (Coors & De Meester 2008; Coors et al. 2008; Coors & De Meester 2011).
Pesticides, including diazinon have been shown to have immunomodulatory effects (Oostingh
et al. 2009; Holmstrup et al. 2010). The immune system seems to be condition- and genotype-
dependent (Carius et al. 2001; Mucklow & Ebert 2003; Rolff & Siva-Jothy 2003) which can
lead to genetic variation in resistance (e.g., Dybdahl & Lively 1998; Baer & Schmid-Hempel
1999) and infection (e.g., Lively 1989; Ebert 1994). I repeatedly found that if the host is
susceptible, and if pesticides enhance parasite virulence depends on the host genotype. For
example, in Chapter 5, I observed interactions between host genotype, parasite and pesticide:
in one clone, parasite spore load was higher when the clone was exposed to diazinon, whereas
for the other clone, parasite spore load was higher when the clone was not exposed to
Chapter 7 Discussion & Conclusion
91
diazinon. G×E×E interactions were also observed when looking at taxon susceptibility in
Chapter 4. I observed that the Daphnia hybrids (but not D. galeata) were more infected
when exposed to the pesticide compared to unexposed hybrids. In this experiment, reduced
hybrid fecundity under pesticide exposure, as well as the higher susceptibility of hybrids,
indicates that hybrid Daphnia species are more adversely affected by the environmental
stressors, parasites and pesticides. Interactions between host-parasites and environment are
increasingly being considered, particularly at the genotype level, to affect host-parasite
interactions and coevolution (Lazzaro et al. 2008; Wolinska & King 2009).
In the studies conducted in this thesis I found effects of multiple stressors on an individual
level, but host density and community composition was not affected by simultaneous
exposure (Chapter 4). At that level, parasite stress was the stronger selection factor. This
could be due to the low pesticide concentrations used in that experiment. In general, a dose
effect is very important. For example, depending on the amount of parasite dose (e.g., Ebert et
al. 1998) or chemical concentrations (see Chapter 2) used in the experiment, the harm of a
single stressor on host fitness can vary, and this could also affect the interplay between those
stressors.
In summary, the effects of anthropogenic activities can be manifested at the genotype,
population, and community levels of host-parasite interactions. Both parasite and pesticide
stress can mediate host fitness and community structure. Pesticides can affect key parasite
traits: fitness and virulence, and parasites can act together with ecologically-relevant levels of
pesticide pollution to enhance harm to host health. However, the strength of the combined
exposure to pesticides and parasites are highly variable, and must not be generalized. Effects
depend on host genotype, as well as the pesticide type, parasite dose, and the target host level
(individual, community). Nevertheless, given that parasites are ubiquitous, and anthropogenic
stress is a major cause of disease emergence in wildlife populations (Daszak et al. 2001),
predicting joint effects of stressors are important. In fact, combined effects of multiple
stressors must be considered for risk assessment of environmental pollution or conservation
biology, to make predictions more ecologically realistic and useful. Moreover, the genetic
diversity of exposed populations might be at higher risk, resulting in changes in the genetic
structure and opportunity for selection in whole ecosystems.
Discussion & Conclusion Chapter 7
92
Recommendations for future research direction
Resurrection ecology
Using hatchlings from dormant eggs is a strong tool to study environmental effects on a
decade-long evolutionary scale. In Chapter 3 I failed to show evolutionary responses to
multiple stressors over time, as I did not have a visible sign of infection and therefor I could
not quantify infection success (spore density) over time. Nevertheless, from this study I
learned that for investigating multiple stressors over several decades it would be an advantage
to use several stressors which are all historically well documented or measureable in the
sediment. For example, using an approach as in Chapter 3, the anthropogenic stressor could
be a heavy metal (e.g., lead) which is accumulating in the sediment. In general, resurrection
ecology creates great opportunities to answer questions related to disturbance ecology and can
be applied to questions concerning disturbance effects on natural populations on a multi-
decade scale. Having knowledge of the distribution of environmental stressors in the past
provides a mechanism to follow changes in community structure, for example, by linking
genetic variation through time to environmental changes along extended time axes.
Combining field studies with mesocosm and laboratory studies
Another approach is to do field studies to examine the influence of abiotic stressors on host-
parasite interactions (e.g., Minguez et al. 2009; King et al. 2010; Marcogliese et al. 2010;
Wenger et al. 2010). Such field studies reflect realistic conditions, but are sometimes difficult
to interpret; it is difficult to control for confounding factors. The combination of field studies
and controlled mesocosms or laboratory studies helps to better interpret effects of multiple
stressors. Furthermore, potential confounding factors (e.g., trait-mediated effects or density-
mediated effects) can be disentangled and accounted for. Moreover, genes involved in host-
parasite interactions can be identified from laboratory experiments and reconciled with studies
in natural populations in stressed versus non-stressed habitats. For example, one can examine
the difference in expression of the candidate genes in more or less polluted habitats.
Interaction of disease and anthropogenic stress factor
When testing the effect of multiple stressors on host fitness in Chapter 3 we observed that
combined exposure of parasite spores and pesticide-reduced host survival significantly
compared to when exposed to a single stressor. This suggests that under certain conditions the
immune system can cope with one stress, but is compromised with multiple stressors.
Moreover, I demonstrated that host clones vary in susceptibility to parasites based on their
Chapter 7 Discussion & Conclusion
93
ecological habitat. The next step is to test on a range of clones varying in susceptibility to one
parasite strain (genetic diversity of susceptibility to parasites) if an anthropogenic stress factor
can influence the development of the disease. Are less susceptible clones fitter when exposed
to combined stress factors than highly susceptible clones? The expectation would be that less
susceptible individuals may have a stronger immune system, one that is less affected by a
second stressor, like diazinon, than those with high parasite susceptibility. Such a study could
be further expanded by using several parasite strains instead of one strain and exposing them
in a matrix (e.g., Carius et al. 2001), but under varying concentrations of pesticide. Revealing
G×G×E effects, the results would show if anthropogenic stress affects host-parasite
specificity.
Epidemiological models including environment
Epidemiological models are increasingly integrating the environment to determine how local
conditions affect disease spread (e.g., Lafferty & Holt 2003; Hall et al. 2007; Hall et al. 2009),
as well as host-parasite coevolution (Mostowy & Engelstaedter 2011). Our model from
Chapter 6 could be expanded to ask: (1) What is the optimal level of virulence in a
fluctuating environment (when virulence is environment-dependent), and (2) How does the
optimal level change with different functional relationships between virulence and
environmental quality? In my opinion, models have to be tested with empirical data.
Therefore, the relationships between environmental factors and virulence should be quantified
in natural systems vulnerable to environmental variation over space and time. Ideal candidates
would be organisms and parasites which interact across seasons or a range of habitats, perhaps
those that are anthropogenically-degraded.
References
Altermatt, F., and D. Ebert. 2008. Genetic diversity of Daphnia magna populations enhances
resistance to parasites. Ecol. Lett. 11:918-928.
Altizer, S., D. Harvell, and E. Friedle. 2003. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats
to biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:589-596.
Baer, B., and P. Schmid-Hempel. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite
loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397:151-154.
Baird, D. J., and P. J. Van den Brink. 2007. Using biological traits to predict species
sensitivity to toxic substances. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 67:296-301.
Barata, C., D. J. Baird, A. Soares, and L. Guilhermino. 2001. Biochemical factors
contributing to response variation among resistant and sensitive clones of Daphnia
magna Straus exposed to ethyl parathion. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 49:155-163.
Bull, J. J. 1994. Perspective: Virulence. Evolution 48:1423-1437.
Discussion & Conclusion Chapter 7
94
Cairns, J. 1984. Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental-
hazard. Environ. Monit. Assess. 4:259-273.
Carius, H. J., T. J. Little, and D. Ebert. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association:
Potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1136-1145.
Chapman, P. M. 2000. Whole effluent toxicity testing - Usefulness, level of protection, and
risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:3-13.
Chu, F. L. E., and R. C. Hale. 1994. Relationship between pollution and susceptibility to
infectious-disease in the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Environ. Res.
38:243-256.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2008. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple
stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in Daphnia magna. J.
Appl. Ecol. 45:1820-1828.
Coors, A., and L. De Meester. 2011. Fitness and virulence of a bacterial endoparasite in an
environmentally stressed crustacean host. Parasitology 138:122-131.
Coors, A., E. Decaestecker, M. Jansen, and L. De Meester. 2008. Pesticide exposure strongly
enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host model. Oikos 117:1840-1846.
Coors, A., J. Vanoverbeke, T. De Bie, and L. De Meester. 2009. Land use, genetic diversity
and toxicant tolerance in natural populations of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Toxicol.
95:71-79.
Crain, C. M., K. Kroeker, and B. S. Halpern. 2008. Interactive and cumulative effects of
multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 11:1304-1315.
Daszak, P., A. A. Cunningham, and A. D. Hyatt. 2001. Anthropogenic environmental change
and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Trop. 78:103-116.
Day, T. 2001. Parasite transmission modes and the evolution of virulence. Evolution 55:2389-
2400.
Duffy, M. A., and S. R. Hall. 2008. Selective predation and rapid evolution can jointly
dampen effects of virulent parasites on Daphnia populations. Am. Nat. 171:499-510.
Duffy, M. A., and L. Sivars-Becker. 2007. Rapid evolution and ecological host-parasite
dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 10:44-53.
Dybdahl, M. F., and C. M. Lively. 1998. Host-parasite coevolution: Evidence for rare
advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52:1057-1066.
Ebert, D. 1994. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science
265:1084-1086.
Ebert, D., and E. A. Herre. 1996. The evolution of parasitic diseases. Parasitol. Today 12:96-
101.
Ebert, D., and W. W. Weisser. 1997. Optimal killing for obligate killers: The evolution of life
histories and virulence of semelparous parasites. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 264:985-
991.
Ebert, D., C. D. Zschokke-Rohringer, and H. J. Carius. 1998. Within- and between-population
variation for resistance of Daphnia magna to the bacterial endoparasite Pasteuria
ramosa. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 265:2127-2134.
Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecolgoy of invasions by animals and plants. John Wiley, New York,
New York.
Folt, C. L., C. Y. Chen, M. V. Moore, and J. Burnaford. 1999. Synergism and antagonism
among multiple stressors. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44:864-877.
Frank, S. A. 1996. Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71:37-78.
Garnick, E. 1992. Parasite virulence and parasite-host coevolution - A reappraisal. J.
Parasitol. 78:381-386.
Chapter 7 Discussion & Conclusion
95
Gendron, A. D., D. J. Marcogliese, S. Barbeau, M. S. Christin, P. Brousseau, S. Ruby, D. Cyr,
and M. Fournier. 2003. Exposure of leopard frogs to a pesticide mixture affects life
history characteristics of the lungworm Rhabdias ranae. Oecologia 135:469-476.
Hall, S. R., C. J. Knight, C. R. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2009.
Qualtity matters: resurce quality for hosts and the timing of epidemics. Ecol. Lett.
12:118-128.
Hall, S. R., L. Sivars-Becker, C. Becker, M. A. Duffy, A. J. Tessier, and C. E. Caceres. 2007.
Eating yourself sick: Transmission of disease as a function of foraging ecology. Ecol.
Lett. 10:207-218.
Hanazato, T. 2001. Pesticide effects on freshwater zooplankton: An ecological perspective.
Environ. Pollut. 112:1-10.
Hanazato, T., and S. I. Dodson. 1995. Synergistic, effects of low oxygen concentration,
predator kairomone, and a pesticide on the cladoceran Daphnia pulex. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 40:700-709.
Hanazato, T., and M. Yasuno. 1987. Effects of a carbamate insecticide, carbaryl, on the
summer phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in ponds. Environ. Pollut.
48:145-159.
Holmstrup, M., A. M. Bindesbol, G. J. Oostingh, A. Duschl, V. Scheil, H. R. Kohler, S.
Loureiro, A. Soares, A. L. G. Ferreira, C. Kienle, A. Gerhardt, R. Laskowski, P. E.
Kramarz, M. Bayley, C. Svendsen, and D. J. Spurgeon. 2010. Interactions between
effects of environmental chemicals and natural stressors: A review. Sci. Total Environ.
408:3746-3762.
Jansen, M., A. Coors, R. Stoks, and L. De Meester. 2011. Evolutionary ecotoxicology of
pesticide resistance: A case study in Daphnia. Ecotoxicology 20:543-551.
King, K. C., J. D. McLaughlin, M. Boily, and D. J. Marcogliese. 2010. Effects of agricultural
landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biol. Conserv. 143:302-
310.
Klerks, P. L., and J. S. Weis. 1987. Genetic adaptation to heavy-metals in aquatic organisms -
A review. Environ. Pollut. 45:173-205.
Konstantinou, I. K., D. G. Hela, and T. A. Albanis. 2006. The status of pesticide pollution in
surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.
Environ. Pollut. 141:555-570.
Kreutz, L. C., L. J. G. Barcellos, A. Marteninghe, E. D. dos Santos, and R. Zanatta. 2010.
Exposure to sublethal concentration of glyphosate or atrazine-based herbicides alters
the phagocytic function and increases the susceptibility of silver catfish fingerlings
(Rhamdia quelen) to Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol.
29:694-697.
Lafferty, K. D., and R. D. Holt. 2003. How should environmental stress affect the population
dynamics of disease? Ecol. Lett. 6:654-664.
Lazzaro, B. P., H. A. Flores, J. G. Lorigan, and C. P. Yourth. 2008. Genotype-by-environment
interactions and adaptation to local temperature affect immunity and fecundity in
Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathogens 4.
Lively, C. M. 1989. Adaptation by a parasitic trematode to local populations of its snail host.
Evolution 43:1663-1671.
Lively, C. M. 2010. The effect of host genetic diversity on disease spread. Am. Nat.
175:E149-E152.
Marcogliese, D. J., C. Dautremepuits, A. D. Gendron, and M. Fournier. 2010. Interactions
between parasites and pollutants in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in the St.
Lawrence River, Canada: Implications for resistance and tolerance to parasites. Can. J.
Zool. 88:247-258.
Discussion & Conclusion Chapter 7
96
Marcogliese, D. J., and M. Pietrock. 2011. Combined effects of parasites and contaminants on
animal health: Parasites do matter. Trends Parasitol. 27:123-130.
Minguez, L., A. Meyer, D. P. Molloy, and L. Giamberini. 2009. Interactions between
parasitism and biological responses in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha):
Importance in ecotoxicological studies. Environ. Res. 109:843-850.
Mostowy, R., and J. Engelstaedter. 2011. The impact of environmental change on host-
parasite coevolutionary dynamics Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences B
- Biological Science 278:2283-2292.
Mucklow, P. T., and D. Ebert. 2003. Physiology of immunity in the water flea Daphnia
magna: Environmental and genetic aspects of phenoloxidase activity. Physiol.
Biochem. Zool. 76:836-842.
Oostingh, G. J., G. Wichmann, M. Schmittner, I. Lehmann, and A. Duschl. 2009. The
cytotoxic effects of the organophosphates chlorpyrifos and diazinon differ from their
immunomodulating effects. J. Immunotoxicol. 6:136-145.
Relyea, R., and J. Hoverman. 2006. Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: A review and
synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecol. Lett. 9:1157-1171.
Relyea, R. A. 2003. Predator cues and pesticides: A double dose of danger for amphibians.
Ecol. Appl. 13:1515-1521.
Relyea, R. A., and J. T. Hoverman. 2008. Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on
aquatic communities. Oikos 117:1647-1658.
Reusch, T. B. H., A. Ehlers, A. Hammerli, and B. Worm. 2005. Ecosystem recovery after
climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
102:2826-2831.
Rohr, J. R., A. M. Schotthoefer, T. R. Raffel, H. J. Carrick, N. Halstead, J. T. Hoverman, C.
M. Johnson, L. B. Johnson, C. Lieske, M. D. Piwoni, P. K. Schoff, and V. R. Beasley.
2008. Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species.
Nature 455:1235-1240.
Rolff, J., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 2003. Invertebrate ecological immunology. Science 301:472-
475.
Rubach, M. N., D. J. Baird, and P. J. Van den Brink. 2010. A new method for ranking mode-
specific sensitivity of freshwater arthropods to insecticides and its relationship to
biological traits. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 29:476-487.
Schmid-Hempel, P. 1998. Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton,
New Jersey.
Sherman, P. W., T. D. Seeley, and H. K. Reeve. 1988. Parasites, pathoghens, and polyandry
in social Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 131:602-610.
Sih, A., A. M. Bell, and J. L. Kerby. 2004. Two stressors are far deadlier than one. Trends
Ecol. Evol. 19:274-276.
Spielman, D., B. W. Brook, D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham. 2004. Does inbreeding and loss
of genetic diversity decrease disease resistance? Conserv. Genet. 5:439-448.
Wenger, M., M. Ondrackova, M. Machala, J. Neca, P. Hyrsl, A. Simkova, P. Jurajda, P. von
der Ohe, and H. Segner. 2010. Assessing relationships between chemical exposure,
parasite infection, fish health, and fish ecological status: A case study using chub
(Leuciscus cephalus) in the Bilina river, Csech Republic. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
29:453-466.
Wittmer, I. K., H. P. Bader, R. Scheidegger, H. Singer, A. Luck, I. Hanke, C. Carlsson, and C.
Stamm. 2010. Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide
dynamics in surface waters. Water Res. 44:2850-2862.
Wolinska, J., and K. C. King. 2009. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite
interactions. Trends Parasitol. 25:236-244.
97
Curriculum vitae
Hubring 42 • 8303 Bassersdorf • Switzerland
Phone : +41 (0)78 840 02 01 • E-mail: claudia.buser@eawag; claudiabuser@hotmail.com
CLAUDIA CAROLINA BUSER
EDUCATION
2008 – present Ph.D. position, Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, Dübendorf,
and Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
2007 – 2008 Master of Science in Biology, Systematics and Evolution, Zoological
Museum, University of Zürich, Switzerland
2003 – 2007 Bachelor of Science in Biology, University of Zürich, Switzerland
LANGUAGES
German First language
Spanish Fluent in spoken and written
English Fluent in spoken and written
French Fluent in spoken and written
PUBLICATIONS
Demont, M., Buser, C.C., Oliver, M.Y., Bussière, L.F. Polyandry in the wild: Differential
sperm storage and temporal changes in sperm competition intensity in yellow dung flies.
Functional Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01861.x, in press.
Jansen, M., De Meester, L., Cielen, A., Buser, C.C., Stocks, R. The interplay of past and
current stress exposure on the water flea Daphnia. Functional Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2435.2011.01869.x, in press.
CV Claudia C. Buser
98
MANUSCRIPTS IN REVISION
Buser, C.C., King, K.C. Environment-dependent virulence and transmission affect disease
spread in host populations.
Buser, C.C., Ward, P.I., Bussière, L.F. How maternal perception of larval environments
influences clutch size, larval performance, and paternity in yellow dung flies.
SUBMITTED MANUSCRIPTS
Buser, C.C., Spaak, P., Wolinska, J. Disease and pollution alter Daphnia community
structure. Submitted to Freshwater Biology.
Buser, C.C., Wolinska, J, Spaak, P. Evolutionary and environmental effects of pesticide
exposure on parasite fitness and virulence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, in review.
Kashian, D., Buser C.C. The role of diapausing eggs in disturbance ecology. Book chapter in
Resurrection ecology, C. W. Kerfoot, ed.
MANUSCRIPTS IN PREPARATION
Buser, C.C., Fox, J.A., Kretschmann, A., Brede, N., Spaak, P. Variation within and between
taxa cannot be ignored in toxicity test.
Buser, C.C., Jansen, M. Pauwels, K., De Meester, L. Spaak, P. Combined exposure to
parasites and pesticides causes increased mortality in the water flea Daphnia.
Wüst, C., Demont, M., Buser, C.C., Bussière, L.F. How female reproductive tract
morphology affects sperm movement in yellow dung flies.
Dupont, L., Viard, F., Pérez Portela, R., Buser, C.C., El Nagar, A., and Bishop, J.D.D.
Paradox revisited: severe cyto-nuclear founder effects in rapidly expanding Corella eumyota
(Urochordata: Ascidiacea) populations in NW Europe.
INTERNSHIP
02/2009 - 06/2009 Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Claudia C. Buser CV
99
WORK EXPERIENCES
10/2006 – 04/2007 Research assistant, Zoological Museum, University of Zürich,
Switzerland
07/2006 – 10/2006 Research assistant, Marine Biological Association of the United
Kingdom, Plymouth, United Kingdom
07/2003 – 09/2003 Voluntary service, Foundation for information and research on marine
mammals (firmm), Pedro Cortés, 11380 Tarifa, Spain
TEACHING EXPERIENCES
2008 Supervising undergraduate student, Department of Aquatic Ecology,
Eawag, Switzerland
2007 Tutor in the reproduction course, Zoological Museum, University of
Zürich, Switzerland
2007 Tutor in the systematic zoology course, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
2007 and 2005 Tutor in systematic zoology course, University of Zürich, Switzerland
2004 Tutor in chemistry course, University of Zürich, Switzerland
INVITED PRESENTATION
10/2010 Bloomington, USA: Buser C.C., Wolinska J., Spaak P. “The
influence of a pesticide on host-parasite interactions”
CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS
08/2011 ESEB meeting, Tübingen, Germany: Buser C.C., Ward P.I., Bussière
L.I. “Maternal perception of the larval environment affects offspring
performance but not paternity” (poster)
03/2011 GEDIHAP- annual meeting, Zürich, Switzerland: Buser C.C.,
Wolinska J., Spaak P. “Disease and pollution alter Daphnia
community structure” (talk)
CV Claudia C. Buser
100
02/2011 Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics, Leuven, Belgium: Spaak P, Buser C.C,
Schöbel C, Wolinska J “The coexistence of hybrid and parental
Daphnia – the role of parasites” (talk)
11/2010 SETAC, Portland, USA; Buser C.C., Wolinska J., Spaak P. “The
influence of an insecticide on Daphnia individuals and populations
exposed to parasites” (poster)
06/2010 ASLO Summer Meeting, Santa Fe, USA: Buser C.C., Wolinska J.,
Jansen M., Spaak P. “The influence of a pesticide (Diazinon) on
Daphnia-parasite interactions” (talk)
09/2009 Resurrection ecology, Hertzberg, Switzerland: Buser C.C., Jansen M.,
Pauwels K., De Meester L., Spaak P. “Effect of two stress factor on
host fitness” (talk)
08/2009 ESEB meeting, Turin, Italy: Buser C.C., Jansen M., Pauwels K., De
Meester L., Spaak P. “Effect of two stress factor on host fitness”
(poster)
10/2008 Symposium on Sexual Selection, Sperm Competition & Cryptic
Female Choice in Honour of Paul Ward, Zürich, Switzerland: Buser
C.C., Bussière L.I. “Do female yellow dung flies adjust oviposition
and paternity according to perceived levels of larval competition?”
(talk)
04/2008 BEES, Zürich, Switzerland: Buser, C.C. “Do female dung flies adjust
paternity according to the level of larval competition?” (talk)
09/2007 Fortgeschrittenenseminar in Evolutionsbiologie, Kilchberg,
Switzerland: Buser C.C. “Oviposition behaviour of the yellow dung
fly“ (talk)
WORKSHOP
09/2009 Host-Parasite Coevolution Workshop, Frauenchiemsee, Germany
Claudia C. Buser CV
101
GRANTS
2010 ETH travel fund (CHF 725)
SETAC-Portland travel award (USD 265)
2009 Eawag Mobility support for the realization of experiments in a foreign
institute (CHF 5600)
SKILLS
Molecular techniques DNA and RNA extraction (different methods), PCR (touch down
PCR, semi-quantitative PCR), genotyping (with different sequencers
and gels), gel electrophoresis (polyacrylamide, agarose), microarrays
Software experience Statistical analysis software (R, SPSS, Statistica), graphing software
(SigmaPlot), genotyping software package (GeneMapper®),
population genetics software packages (Genepop, FSTAT) and
modelling software (Mathematica)
Relevant techniques Microdissection, microscopy and image analysis, laboratory culture of
sessile invertebrates, insects and crustacean
Field work Insect and crustacean sampling, marine invertebrate sampling on
rocky shores, marina and an offshore breakwater, sediment core
sampling
Licences Driving licences (car, motor bike, motor boat, sailing boat),
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), rescue swimming (Brevet 1,
ABC 1), diving (Paddy advanced, nitrox diving)
102
103
Acknowledgments
For sure, this PhD would not have been possible nor would have been so much fun without all
the people around me! I would like to thank the following people for the great support during
my doctorate:
Piet Spaak for giving me the opportunity to do my PhD at Eawag, for supervising me
during the whole period, for always having his door open to discuss new
ideas/projects/problems, for being open to all my nice collaborations and for the support
to go for some months to the University of Leuven. I really appreciated that he always
trusted me and gave me the freedom to work independently.
Justyna Wolinska for being my co-supervisor, for discussing and improving ideas, for
giving hints for practical work and for her patience in reading, commenting and polishing
my manuscripts.
Christoph Vorburger, Jukka Jokela , Justyna Wolinska and Piet Spaak for being part of
my PhD committee, for many fruitful scientific discussions, for excellent advises and for
always having an open door for questions.
Christoph Haag and Paul Schmid-Hempel for being my examiners.
Andreas Kretschmann, Christoph Tellenbach, Donna Kashian, Jennifer Fox, Joost
Vanoverbecke, Kayla King, Kewin Pauwels, Luc De Meester, Luisa Orsini, Mieke Jansen,
Nora Brede, Piet Spaak and Justyna Wolinska for all the lovely collaborations in the past,
present and near future. It has been very inspiring to work with you. I am looking forward
to continue working with you.
Blake Matthews, Christoph Vorburger, Jukka Jokela and especially Christoph Tellenbach
and Otto Seppälä, for taking the time to discuss and check my statistical analyses.
Andi Bruder, Chris Robinson, Christian Moser, Christoph Tellenbach, Hanna
Hartikainen, Jennifer Fox, Justyna Wolinska, Kayla King, Katja Räsänen, Marek
Kwiatkowski, Markus Möst, Mat Seymour, Piet Spaak, Silke Van den Wyngaert, Spencer
Hall and the co-authors for reading earlier versions of my manuscripts and other texts to
polish the style and content.
Esther Keller for always answering my nasty questions, for introducing me to the practical
world of Daphnia, for helping me to set up experiments, for measuring animals, for
helping with molecular work and for nice non-scientific chats.
Christine Dambone and Nadja Tschopp for preparing the algae and taking care of my
clones.
Nadja Tschopp and Kirsten Klappert for organizing the laboratory and ordering materials
and chemicals.
Esther Keller, Markus Möst and Silke Van den Wyngaert for helping setting up big
experiments.
Andreas Kretschmann and Roman Ashauer for being my experts of the pesticide diazinon.
Acknowledgments Thank you!
104
The Genetic Diversity Center of ETH, the Werkstatt and the Aua-Labor of Eawag.
The inhabitants of G17 for being great office mates, for the good mood and for having
great discussions.
Chris Robinson, Markus Möst, Remo Freimann and Silke Van den Wyngaert for keeping
me healthy with all the fruit breaks.
Andi, Anja, Aline, Christoph, Diego, Dorota, Katja, Katri, Maria, Markus, Mat, Nora,
Olivier, Otto, Remo, Sandra, Silke, Vicenç and the rest of the Eco department for funny
and unforgettable moments in and outside Eawag.
Eawag for providing the money of the Mobility Support to go to Luc De Meester‟s Lab
for 4 month.
Luc De Meester and his group, especially Evelyne, Luisa, Kevin, Mieke, Nelly, Joachim,
the two Joosts, Sarah, Silvia, Steven and Wendy, for discussing and helping with
experiments and for contributing to a great time in Leuven.
Luc Bussière for introducing me to the nice world of science and for great discussions,
inputs and motivation.
My mother Olivia Buser for her support, for being concerned about my welfare, for
providing me with excellent food, for occasionally giving me a lift to Eawag and for
listening to and supporting my moods.
My father Ruedi Buser for supporting me during the whole studies, for interesting
discussions and for the beautiful weekends in Saanen.
Christian Moser for the extraordinary support during the whole PhD, for listening to my
concerns, impressions and experiences, for being patient when I had difficulties to turn off
thinking about science, for all the helpful advises and for facilitating decisions. I am
looking forward to our shared future!
Thank you all!