Dr. Andrej Horvat Intelligent Fluid Solutions Ltd. Ljubljana, Slovenia 17 January, 2008...

transcript

Dr. Andrej HorvatIntelligent Fluid Solutions Ltd.

Ljubljana, Slovenia

17 January, 2008

Computational Models for

Prediction of Fire Behaviour Computational Models for

Prediction of Fire Behaviour

IFSIFS Andrej Horvat

Intelligent Fluid Solution Ltd.

127 Crookston Road, London, SE9 1YF, United Kingdom

Tel./Fax: +44 (0)1235 819 729

Mobile: +44 (0)78 33 55 63 73

E-mail: andrej.horvat@intelligentfluidsolutions.co.uk

Web: www.intelligentfluidsolutions.co.uk

Contact information

IFSIFS 1995, Dipl. -Ing. Mech. Eng. (Process Tech.)

University of Maribor

1998, M.Sc. Nuclear Eng.

University of Ljubljana

2001, Ph.D. Nuclear Eng. University of Ljubljana

2002, M.Sc. Mech. Eng. (Fluid Mechanics & Heat Transfer) University of California, Los Angeles

Personal information

IFSIFSMore than 10 years of intensive CFD related experience:

R&D of numerical methods and their implementation (convection schemes, LES methods, semi-analytical methods,

Reynolds Stress models)

Design analysis (large heat exchangers, small heat sinks, burners, drilling equip.,

flash furnaces, submersibles)

Fire prediction and suppression (backdraft, flashover, marine environment, gas releases,

determination of evacuation criteria)

Safety calculations for nuclear and oil industry (water hammer, PSA methods, severe accidents scenarios, pollution

dispersion)

IFSIFSAs well as CFD, experiences also in:

Experimental methods

QA procedures

Standardisation and technical regulations

Commercialisation of technical expertise and software products

IFSIFS Overview of fluid dynamics transport equations

- transport of mass, momentum, energy and composition

- influence of convection, diffusion, volumetric (buoyancy) force

- transport equation for thermal radiation

Averaging and simplification of transport equations

- spatial averaging

- time averaging

- influence of averaging on zone and field models

Zone models

- basics of zone models (1 and 2 zone models)

- advantages and disadvantages

Contents

IFSIFS Field models - numerical mesh and discretisation of transport equations

- turbulence models (k-epsilon, k-omega, Reynolds stress, LES)

- combustion models (mixture fraction, eddy dissipation, flamelet)

- thermal radiation models (discrete transfer, Monte Carlo)

- examples of use

Conclusions - software packages

Examples - diffusion flame

- fire in an enclosure

- fire in a tunnel

Contents

IFSIFS Today, CFD methods are well established tools that help in design,

prototyping, testing and analysis

The motivation for development of modelling methods (not only CFD) is to reduce cost and time of product development, and to improve efficiency and safety of existing products and installations

Verification and validation of modelling approaches by comparing computed results with experimental data are necessary

Nevertheless, in some cases CFD is the only viable research and design tool (e.g. hypersonic flows in rarefied atmosphere)

Some basic thoughts …

IFSIFS

Overview of fluid dynamics

transport equations

IFSIFS Transport equations

The continuum assumption

- A control volume has to contain a large number of particles (atoms or molecules): Knudsen number << 1.0

- At equal distribution of particles (atoms or molecules) flow quantities remain unchanged despite of changes in location and size of a control volume

Eulerian and Lagrangian description

Eulerian description – transport equations for mass, momentum and energy are written for a (stationary) control volume

Lagrangian description – transport equations for mass, momentum and energy are written for a moving material particle

IFSIFS Transport of mass and composition

Transport of momentum

Transport of energy

Transport equations

Majority of the numerical modelling in fluid mechanics is based on Eulerian formulation of transport equations

Using the Eulerian formulation, each physical quantity is described as a mathematical field. Therefore, these models are also named field models

Lagrangian formulation is basis for modelling of particle dynamics: bubbles, droplets (sprinklers), solid particles (dust) etc.

Droplets trajectories from sprinklers (left), gas temperature field during fire suppression (right)

Eulerian formulation of mass transport equation

integral form differential (weak) form

The equation also appears in the following forms

non-conservative form

change of mass in a control vol.

flux difference(convection)

in incompressible fluid flow

IFSIFS Eulerian formulation of mass fraction transport equation

(general form)

Transport equations

change of mass of a component in a control vol.

flux difference

(convection)

diffusive mass flow

Eulerian formulation of momentum equation

change of momentum in a control vol. flux difference

(convection)

volumetric force

pressure force

viscous force

(diffusion)

IFSIFSTransport equations

Eulerian formulation of energy transport equation

change of internal energy in a control vol.

flux difference

(convection)

deformation work

diffusive heat flow

IFSIFS The following physical laws and terms also need to be

included

- Newton's viscosity law - Fourier's law of heat conduction- Fick's law of mass transfer

- Sources and sinks due to thermal radiation, chemical reactions etc.

Transport equations

diffusive terms -flux is a linear function of a gradient

IFSIFS Transport of mass and composition

Transport of momentum

Transport of energy

Transport equations

Lagrangian formulation is simpler

- equation of the particle location

- mass conservation eq. for a particle

- momentum conservation eq. for a particle

volumetric forces

drag lift

- thermal energy conservation eq. for a particle

Conservation equations of Lagrangian model need to be solved for each representative particle

thermal radiation

convection latent heat

IFSIFSThermal radiation

I(s) I(s+ds)

Transport equations

in-scatteringchange of radiationintensity

absorption and

out-scattering

emission

IFSIFS Thermal radiation

Equations describing thermal radiation are much more complicated

- spectral dependency of material properties - angular (directional) dependence of the radiation transport

Transport equations

in-scatteringchange of radiationintensity

absorption and

out-scattering

emission

IFSIFS

Averaging and simplification

of transport equations

IFSIFSAveraging and simplification of transport equations

The presented set of transport equations is analytically unsolvable for the majority of cases

Success of a numerical solving procedure is based on density of the numerical grid, and in transient cases, also on the size of the integration time-step

Averaging and simplification of transport equations help (and improve) solving the system of equations:

- derivation of averaged transport equations for turbulent flow simulation

- derivation of integral (zone) models

IFSIFSAveraging and simplification of transport equations

Averaging and filtering

The largest flow structures can occupy the whole flow field, whereas the smallest vortices have the size of Kolmogorov scale

, vi , p, h

IFSIFS

Kolmogorov scale is (for most cases) too small to be captured with a numerical grid

Therefore, the transport equations have to be filtered (averaged) over:

- spatial interval Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methods

- time interval k-epsilon model, SST model, Reynolds stress models

t,xht,xht,xhd,xhtGt,xh

t,x'h t,xht,xh d t,h xGt,xh

IFSIFS

Transport equation variables can be decomposed onto a filtered (averaged) part and a residual (fluctuation)

Filtered (averaged) transport equations

sources and sinks represent a separate problem and require additional models

- turbulent stresses- Reynolds stresses- subgrid stressesturbulent heat fluxes

turbulent mass fluxes

IFSIFS

Turbulent stresses

Transport equation

- the equation is not solvable due to the higher order product

- all turbulence models include at least some of the terms of this equation (at least the generation and the dissipation term)

turbulence generation

turbulence dissipation

higher order product

IFSIFS

Turbulent heat and mass fluxes

Transport equation

- the equation is not solvable due to the higher order product

- most of the turbulence models do not take into account the equation

generation

dissipation

higher order product

IFSIFS

Turbulent heat fluxes due to thermal radiation

- little is known and published on the subject

- majority of models do not include this contribution

- radiation heat flow due to turbulence

IFSIFS

Buoyancy induced flow over a heat source (Gr=10e10); inert model of a fire

IFSIFS

LES model; instantaneous temperature field

IFSIFS

(a) a) b)

Temperature field comparison: a) steady-state RANS model, b) averaged LES model results

IFSIFS

(a) a) b)

Comparison of instantaneous mass fraction in a gravity current : a) transient RANS model, b) LES model

IFSIFS

Additional simplifications

- flow can be modelled as a steady-state case the solution is a result of force, energy and mass flow balance taking into consideration sources and sinks

- fire can be modelled as a simple heat source inert models; do not need to solve transport equations for composition

- thermal radiation heat transfer is modelled as a simple sink of thermal energy FDS takes 35% of thermal energy

- control volumes can be so large that continuity of flow properties is not preserved zone models

IFSIFS

Zone models

IFSIFS Basics

- theoretical base of zone model is conservation of mass and energy in a space separated onto zones

- thermodynamic conditions in a zone are constant; in fields models the conditions are constant in a control volume

- zone models take into account released heat due to combustion of flammable materials, buoyant flows as a consequence of fire, mass flow, smoke dynamics and gas temperature

- zone models are based on certain empirical assumptions

- in general, they can be divided onto one- and two-zone models

Zone models

IFSIFS One-zone and two-zone models

- one-zone models can be used only for assessment of a fully developed fire after flashover

- in such conditions, a valid approximation is that the gas temperature, density, internal energy and pressure are (more or less) constant across the room

Zone models

Qw (konv+rad)

Qin (konv)Qout (konv+rad)

mout minmf , Hf

pg , Tg , mg , vg

IFSIFS One-zone and two-zone models

- two-zone models can be used for evaluation of a localised fire before flashover

- a room is separated onto different zone, most often onto an upper and lower zone, a fire and buoyant flow of gases above the fire

- conditions are uniform and constant in each zone

Zone models

Qw (konv+rad)

Qin (konv)

QU,out (konv+rad)

mU,out

mL,out

mf , Hf

spodnja conapL,g , TL,g , mL,g , vL,g

zgornja conapU,g , TU,g , mU,g , vU,g

QL,out (konv+rad)

IFSIFS Advantages and disadvantages of zone models

- in zone models, ordinary differential equations describe the conditions more easily solvable equations

- because of small number of zones, the models are fast

- simple setup of different arrangement of spaces as well as of size and location of openings

- these models can be used only in the frame of theoretical assumptions that they are based on

- they cannot be used to obtain a detailed picture of flow and thermal conditions

- these models are limited to the geometrical arrangements that they can describe

Zone models

IFSIFS

Field models

IFSIFS Numerical grid and discretisation of transport equations

- analytical solutions of transport equations are known only for few very simple cases

- for most real world cases, one needs to use numerical methods and algorithms, which transform partial differential equations to a series of algebraic equations

- each discrete point in time and space corresponds to an equation, which connects a grid point with its neighbours

- The process is called discretisation. The following methods are used: finite difference method, finite volume method, finite element method and boundary element method (and different hybrid methods)

Field models

IFSIFSNumerical grid and discretisation of transport equations

- simple example of discretisation

- many different discretisation schemes exist; they can be divided onto conservative and non-conservative schemes (linked to the discrete form of the convection term)

Field models

- non-conservative schemes represent a linear form and therefore they are more stable and numerically better manageable

- non-conservative schemes do not conserve transported quantities, which can lead to time-shift of a numerical solution

Field models

time-shift due to a non-conservative scheme

- quality of numerical discretisation is defined with discrepancy between a numerical approximation and an analytical solution

- error is closely link to the order of discretisation

Field models

1st order truncation (~x)

- higher order methods lead to lower truncation errors, but more neighbouring nodes are needed to define a derivative for a discretised transport equation

- two types of numerical error: dissipation and dispersion

Field models

- during the discretisation process most of the attention goes to the convection terms

- the 1st order methods have dissipative truncation error, whereas the 2nd order methods introduce numerical dispersion

- today's hybrid methods are a combination of 1st and 2nd order accurate schemes. These methods switch automatically from a 2nd order to a 1st order scheme near discontinuities to damp oscillations (TVD schemes)

- there are also higher order schemes (ENO, WENO etc.) but their use is limited on structured numerical meshes

Field models

- connection matrix and location of neighbouring grid nodes defines two types of numerical grid: structured and unstructured numerical grid

structured grid unstructured grid

Field models

k k+3 k+9

k+1k+2

k+7 k+5

i+1, j i-1, j

i, j+1 i-1, j+1

i-1, j-1 i, j-1 i+1, j-1

i+1, j+1

- unstructured grids raise a possibility of arbitrary orientation and form of control volumes and therefore offer larger geometrical flexibility

- all modern simulation packages (CFX, Fluent, Star-CD) are based on the unstructured grid arrangement

Field models

- flame above a burner

- automatic refinement of unstructured numerical grid

- start with 44,800 control volumes; 3 stages of refinement which leads to 150,000 cont. volumes

- refinement criteria - velocity and temperature gradients

IFSIFS

Turbulence

models

IFSIFS

Turbulence models

laminar flow

transitional flow

turbulent flow

van Dyke, 1965

IFSIFSTurbulence models introduce additional (physically related)

diffusion to a numerical simulation

This enables :

- RANS models to use a larger time step (Δt >> Kolmogorov time scale) or even steady-state simulation

- LES models to use less dense (smaller) numerical grid (Δx > Kolmogorov length scale)

The selection of the turbulence model influences the distribution of the simulated flow fundamentally and hence that of the flow variables (velocity, temperature, heat flow, composition etc)

Turbulence models

IFSIFS In general 2 kinds of averaging (filtering) exist, which

leads to 2 families of turbulence models:

- filtering over a spatial interval Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models

- filtering over a time interval Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models: k-epsilon model, SST model, Reynolds Stress models etc

For RANS models, size of the averaging time interval is not known or given (statistical average of experimental data)

For LES models, size of the filter or the spatial averaging interval is a basic input parameter (in most case it is equal to grid spacing)

Turbulence models

IFSIFSTurbulence models

Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models

For two-equation models (e.g. k-epsilon, k-omega or SST), 2 additional transport equations need to be solved:

- for kinetic energy of turbulent fluctuations

- for dissipation of turbulent fluctuations

- for frequency of turbulent fluctuations

IFSIFS Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models

k-epsilon model

production (source) term

Turbulence models

convection production (source) term diffusion destruction (sink) term

- model parameters are usually defined from experimental data e.g. dissipation of grid generated turbulence or flow in a channel

- from the calculated values of k in , eddy viscosity is defined as

- from eddy viscosity, Reynolds stresses, turbulent heat and mass fluxes are obtained

Turbulence models

C C1 C2 C3 k Prt

0.09 1.44 1.92 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.9

- transport equation for k is derived directly from the transport equations for Reynolds stresses

- transport equation for is empirical

- these equations have a common form: source and sink term, convection and diffusion term

- the rest of the terms are model specific and they can be numerically and computationally very demanding

- definition and implementation of boundary conditions is different even for the same turbulence model between different software vendors

For Reynolds Stress (RS) model, 7 additional transport equations need to be solved:

- for 6 components of Reynolds stress tensor

- for dissipation of turbulent fluctuations

- for frequency of turbulent fluctuations

Reynolds stress model

generation (source) term

Turbulence models

convection generation (source) term

diffusion term destruction (sink) term

pressure-velocity fluctuation term

- Reynolds stress models calculate turbulent stresses directly introduction of eddy viscosity is not needed

- includes the pressure-velocity fluctuation term

- describes anisotropic turbulent behaviour

- computationally more demanding than the two-equation models

- due to higher order terms (linear and non-linear), RS models are numerically more complex (convergence)

Turbulence models

IFSIFS Turbulence models

Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models

- Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models are based on spatial filtering (averaging)

- many different forms of the filter exist, but most common is "top hat" filter (simple geometrical averaging)

- the size of the filter is based on grid node spacing

Basic assumption of LES methodology:

Size of the used filter is so small that the averaged flow structures do no influence large structures, which contain most of the energy.

These small structures are being deformed, disintegrated onto even smaller structures until they do not dissipate due to viscosity (kinetic energy thermal energy).

- required size of flow structures for LES modelling

- these structures are in the turbulence inertial subrange and they are isotropic

- on this level, turbulence production is of the same size as turbulence dissipation

- eddy (turbulent) viscosity is defined as

- using the definition of turbulent (subgrid) stresses

and turbulent fluxes

the expression for turbulent viscosity can be written as

where the contribution due to buoyancy is

grid spacing

- presented Smagorinsky model is the simplest from LES models

- it requires knowledge of empirical parameter Cs, which is not constant for all flow conditions

- newer, dynamic LES models calculates Cs locally - the procedure demands introduction of the secondary filter

- LES models demand much denser (larger) numerical grid

- they are used for transient simulations

- to obtain average flow characteristics, we need to perform statistical averaging over the simulated time interval

Comparison of turbulence models

25 50 75 100

k-e (Gr = 10 10)k-e N&B (Gr = 10 10)RNG k-e (Gr = 10 10)S S T (Gr = 10 10)S S G (Gr = 10 10)LES (Gr = 10 10)Rous e e t al. (1952)S habbir and Ge orge (1994)

25 50 75 100

k-e (Gr = 10 10)k-e N&B (Gr = 10 10)RNG k-e (Gr = 10 10)S S T (Gr = 10 10)S S G (Gr = 10 10)LES (Gr = 10 10)Rous e e t al. (1952)S habbir and Ge orge (1994)

Buoyant flow over a heat source: a) velocity, b) temperature*

IFSIFS

Combustion

models

IFSIFSCombustion models

Chen et al., 1988

Grinstein,Kailasanath, 1992

IFSIFS Combustion can be modelled with heat sources - information on chemical composition is lost - thermal loading is usually under-estimated

Combustion modelling contains

- solving transport equations for composition

- chemical balance equation

- reaction rate model

Modelling approach dictates the number of additional transport equations required

Combustion models

IFSIFS Modelling of composition requires solving n-1 transport

equations for mixture components – mass or molar (volume) fractions

Chemical balance equation can be written as

Combustion models

IFSIFS Reaction source term is defined as

or for multiple reactions

where R or Rk is a reaction rate

Reaction rate is determined using different models

- Constant burning (reaction) velocity - Eddy break-up model and Eddy dissipation model - Finite rate chemistry model - Flamelet model - Burning velocity model

Combustion models

IFSIFS Constant burning velocity sL

speed of flame front propagation is larger due to expansion

- values are experimentally determined for ideal conditions - limits due reaction kinetics and fluid mechanics are not

taken into account

- source/sink in mass fraction transport equation

- source/sink in energy transport equation - expressions for sL usually include additional models

Combustion models

IFSIFS Eddy break-up model and Eddy dissipation model

- is a well established model - based on the assumption that the reaction is much faster

than the transport processes in flow - reaction rate depends on mixing rate of reactants in

turbulent flow

- Eddy break-up model reaction rate

- Eddy dissipation model reaction rate

Combustion models

IFSIFS Eddy break-up model and Eddy dissipation model

- typical values of model coefficients CA = 4 in CB = 0.5

- the model can be used for simple reactions (one- and two-step combustion)

- in general, it cannot be used for prediction of products of complex chemical processes (NO, CO, SOx, etc)

- the use can be extended by adding different reaction rate limiters → extinction due to turbulence, low temperature, chemical time scale etc.

Combustion models

IFSIFS Backdraft simulation

Combustion models

IFSIFS Finite rate chemistry model

- it is applicable when a chemical reaction rate is slow or comparable with turbulent mixing

- reaction kinetics must be known

- for each additional component, the component molar concentration I needs to be multiplied with the product

- for each additional reaction the same expression is added

Combustion models

IFSIFS Finite rate chemistry model

- the model is numerically demanding due to exponential terms

- often the model is used in combination with the Eddy dissipation model

Combustion models

IFSIFS Flamelet model

- describes interaction of reaction kinetics with turbulent structures for a fast reaction (high Damköhler number)

- basic assumption is that combustion is taking place in thin sheets - flamelets

- turbulent flame is an ensemble of laminar flamelets

- the model gives a detailed picture of chemical composition - resolution of small length and time scales of the flow is not needed

- the model is also known as "Mixed-is-burnt" - large difference between various implementations of the model

Combustion models

- the model is only applicable for two-feed systems (fuel and oxidiser)

- it is based on definition of a mixture fraction

Combustion models

Z kg/s fuel

mešalni proces

1 kg/s mixture

1-Z kg/s oxidiser

Z is 1 in a fuel stream, 0 in an oxidiser stream

IFSIFS

- conserved property often used in the mixture fraction definition

- for a simple chemical reaction

the stoihiometric ratio is

Combustion models

Flamelet model

- Shvab-Zel'dovich variable

- the conditions in vicinity of flamelets are described with the respect to Z; Z=Zst is a surface with the stoihiometric conditions

- transport equations are rewritten with Z dependencies; conditions are one-dimensional ξ(Z) , T(Z) etc. - for limited cases, the simplified equations can be solve

analytically

Combustion models

- numerical implementations of the model differ significantly

- for turbulent flow, we need to solve an additional transport equation for mixture fraction Z

- and a transport equation for variation of mixture fraction Z"

Combustion models

- composition is calculated from preloaded libraries

- is the scalar dissipation rate - it increases with stresses (stretching of a flame front) and decreases with diffusion. - at critical value of flame extinguishes

Combustion models

dZZPDFZ~jj

ddZPDFZPDF,Z~jj

these PDFs are tabulated for different fuel, oxidiser, pressure and temperature

IFSIFSCombustion models

Ferreira, Schlatter, 1995

Flamelet model

IFSIFS Burning velocity model

- it is used for pre-mixed or partially pre-mixed combustion

- contains: a) model of the reaction progress: Burning Velocity Model (BVM) or Turbulent Flame Closure (TFC)

b) model for composition of the reacting mixture: Flamelet model

- definition of the reaction progress variable c, where c = 0 corresponds to the fresh mixture, and c = 1 to combustion products

Combustion models

IFSIFSBurning velocity model

Combustion models

Oxidiser

Products

Temperature

Flame location

Preheating Oxidation layer

Reaction layer O()

mm5010 .....lF mm01.0l

- additional transport equation for the reaction progress variable

- source/sink due to combustion is defined as

- better results by solving the transport equation for weighted reaction progress variable

Combustion models

source term

modelling of the turbulent burning velocity

- it is suitable for a single step reaction

- applicable for fast chemistry conditions (Da >> 1)

- a thin reaction zone assumption

- fresh gases and products need to be separated

Combustion models

IFSIFS

Thermal radiation

models

IFSIFS It is a very important heat transfer mechanism during

fire In fire simulations, thermal radiation should not be

neglectedThe simplest approach is to reduce the heat release

rate of a fire (35% reduction in FDS)Modelling of thermal radiation - solving transport

equation for radiation intensity

Thermal radiation

in-scatteringchange of intensity

absorption and scattering

emission

IFSIFSRadiation intensity is used for definition of a source/sink

in the energy transport equation and radiation wall heat fluxes

Energy spectrum of blackbody radiation

- frequency c - speed of light n - refraction index h - Planck's constant kB - Boltzmann's constant

integration over the whole spectrum

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS Models

- Rosseland (primitive model, for optical thick systems, additional

diffusion term in the energy transport equation)

- P1 (strongly simplified radiation transport equation - solution of an additional Laplace equation is required)

- Discrete Transfer (modern deterministic model, assumes isotropic scattering, reasonably homogeneous properties)

- Monte Carlo (modern statistical model, computationally

demanding)

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS Discrete Transfer

- modern deterministic model - assumes isotropic scattering, homogeneous gas properties - each wall cell works as a radiating surface that emits rays through the surrounding space (separated onto multiple solid

angles)- radiation intensity is integrated along each ray between the walls of the simulation domain

- source/sink in the energy transport equation

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS Monte Carlo

- it assumes that the radiation intensity is proportional to (differential angular) flux of photons

- radiation field can be modelled as a "photon gas"

- absorption constant Ka is the probability per unit length of photon absorption at a given frequency

- average radiation intensity I is proportional to the photon travelling distance in a unit volume and time

- radiation heat flux qrad is proportional to the number of photon incidents on the surface in a unit time

- accuracy of the numerical simulation depends on the number of used "photons"

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS These radiation methods can be used:

- for averaged radiation spectrum - grey gas

- for gas mixture, which can be separated onto multiple grey gases (such grey gas is just a modelling concept)

- for individual frequency bands; physical parameters are very different for each band

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS Flashover simulation

Thermal radiation

IFSIFS

Conclusions

IFSIFS The seminar gave a short (but demanding) overview of

fluid mechanics and heat transfer theory that is relevant for fire simulations

All current commercial CFD software packages (ANSYS-CFX, ANSYS-Fluent, Star-CD, Flow3D, CFDRC, AVL Fire) contain most of the shown models and methods:

- they are based on the finite volume or the finite element method and they use transport equations in their conservative form

- numerical grid is unstructured for greater geometrical flexibility

- open-source computational packages exist and are freely accessible (FDS, OpenFoam, SmartFire, Sophie)

Conclusions

IFSIFS I would like to remind you to the project "Methodology for

selection and use of fire models in preparation of fire safety studies, and for intervention groups", sponsored by Ministry of Defence, R. of Slovenia, which contains an overview of functionalities that are offered in commercial software products

Conclusions

IFSIFSAcknowledgement

I would like to thank to our hosts and especially to Aleš Jug

I would like to thank to ANSYS Europe Ltd. (UK) who permitted access to some of the graphical material

Dr. Andrej Horvat Intelligent Fluid Solutions Ltd. Ljubljana, Slovenia 17 January, 2008...

Documents