Post on 20-Jan-2016
description
transcript
SCHOOL CONTEXT
Heights College is a co-ed, independent K-12 College of approximately 450 students in Rockhampton.
College structure consists of approximately 230 primary students and 220 middle and senior school students.
SCHOOL CONTEXT
The College is founded upon Christian ideals and philosophy.
Most families expect their children to abstain from the use of illegal drugs and in many instances those of a socially accepted nature.
IDENTIFIED NEED
Need originally seen at staff in-service regarding drug education and associated resources.
It was identified that staff lacked knowledge of how to respond to drug scenarios.
IDENTIFIED NEED
Staff also lacked knowledge of how to teach students strategies to respond to situations encouraging drug use.
Current College policies only refer to the use of prescribed and over the counter medications.
Case Study - Aim
Initial application prepared by Mrs Kaye Head and Mr Kevin O’Callaghan (Co-Ordinator of Student Studies and Welfare).
AIM – to develop the professional learning needs of staff in the area of drug education.
Case Study - Focii
Specifically the following areas were focused upon:
1) Developing a whole school approach toward drug education.
2) Becoming familiar with local relevant human resources.
Case Study - Focii
3) Enhancing communication to parents regarding policies and implementation
4) Developing staff awareness and identification of drug related behaviours.
On advice from Senior Project Officer, focus point 4 was given top priority.
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 1
All 15 middle and senior school staff. Initial teacher knowledge ascertained
through completion of questionnaire. These results provided our baseline
data.
Some key findings were:
Baseline Data – Key Findings
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
YES NO
Q1 - Awareness ofthe NationalApproach to SchoolDrug Education
Q2 - Have youimplemented any ofthese approaches ?
Baseline Data – Key Findings
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
YES NO
Q5 - Should alcohol/ tobacco beaddressed in a drugeducation program
Baseline Data – Key Findings
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
YES NO
Q8 - Awareness ofresources in Collegelibrary
Q9 - Use of theseresources
Baseline Data – Key Findings
Q 14 – What skills can be taught to students to minimise drug use?
Say no (4) Information (6) Talks by addicts (2) Consequences (5)
Peer responses Self – esteem Self-control
Baseline Data – Key Findings
Q 15 – Major signs of use or affect of drugs. Red / glassy eyes (5) Behaviour problems (5) Aggressive behaviour (4) Change in behaviour (4) Inattentive (3) Lack of interest (3)
Anti – social (3) Depressed or
withdrawn (3) Mood change (2) Dilated pupils (2) Drop in results (2) Tiredness (2)
Baseline Data – Key Findings
Q 19 - What in-service would be of greatest benefit to you ?
Any assistance (4) Signs and symptoms (7) Health Professional (2) Facts (2) Consequences
Student coping mechanisms DVD’s Legal responsibilities
of teacher Extent of discussion
with students
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
Who - Community Health Clinical nurse, Jason Harrison (A.T.O.D. – Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs)
Aim – inform staff of drug related facts familiarity with educational material and
local relevant human resources Provide an opportunity for staff
questions
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
HIGHLIGHTS
Staff failed to identify caffeine as most frequently used drug.
Alcohol and nicotine source of most problems and deaths.
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
HIGHLIGHTS
Drug use affects 4 L’s
Liver, Law, Livelihood and Lover.
Cannabis and amphetamines most commonly used illegal drugs by school age students.
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
HIGHLIGHTS
Signs of drug use – different behaviour, mood changes, aggressive behaviour.
Approach – harm minimisation, not abstinence.
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
WHAT WAS LEARNT
Facts, as previously outlined. Have students list 4 L’s (personalised) Have students identify triggers for drug
use eg stress, boredom Develop goals and strategies with the
student not FOR the student (student must have ownership)
Case Study – Prof. Dvt. Stage 2
WHAT WAS LEARNT
One off sessions don’t work
Whole lifestyle approach
Cross roads program available (Scott Green)
Case Study Measure of Improvement
FOLLOW UP SURVEY REVEALS:
Teachers now feel better equipped (9 out of 12) Most benefit was derived from increase in knowledge of:
– Behavioural changes (5)– Effects of drug use (4)
Case Study Measure of Improvement
FOLLOW UP SURVEY REVEALS:
All teachers were able to identify strategies to initiate assistance for ‘at risk’ or drug using students.
Case Study Measure of Improvement
FOLLOW UP SURVEY REVEALS:
Increased awareness of the local network of professionals.
(11 out of 12)
Contact names, organisations.
Case Study Measure of Improvement
FOLLOW UP SURVEY REVEALS:
Teachers now feel more confident in dealing with drug related issues with their students.
(9 out of 12)
Case Study Measure of Improvement
FOLLOW UP SURVEY REVEALS:
9 out of 12 teachers are currently integrating or are considering integrating drug education into their curriculum.
WHERE TO NOW ?
ASSESSED VIA SURVEY
Q6. What additional resources / in-services would be of benefit to assist you in addressing drug related issues ?
WHERE TO NOW ?
RESPONSE: Signs and effects of drug use.
ADDRESSED THROUGH: Further in-service from Community Health or former drug users.
WHERE TO NOW ?
RESPONSE: Audiovisual resources.
ADDRESSED THROUGH: Obtaining lists of current titles with view to purchase.
WHERE TO NOW ?
RESPONSE: Implement School Policy.
ADDRESSED THROUGH: Staff review of current policy. Staff forum.
THANK YOU